New ticketing system tender
New ticketing system tender
New ticketing system tender
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Executive summary<br />
1.4 Consider points<br />
8 <strong>New</strong> Ticketing System Tender<br />
Part 4: Management of the NTS <strong>tender</strong><br />
4.2(a) For major and complex <strong>tender</strong>s with a significant risk component (ie. where<br />
the procurement contract would assign significant risk to the government, in<br />
the form of guarantees, indemnities, residual obligations and other risks), DTF<br />
should consider developing a framework for determining and articulating, in a<br />
common language and on a project-by-project basis, the maximum acceptable<br />
risk level to be borne by government.<br />
4.2(b) In concert with the development of such a framework, DTF should consider<br />
whether there is a need for training in risk allocation principles for practitioners<br />
involved in major <strong>tender</strong>s conducted outside the Partnerships Victoria<br />
framework.<br />
4.3 For each major and complex <strong>tender</strong>, the <strong>tender</strong>ing authority should consider<br />
publishing, at the commencement of the procurement process, a value for<br />
money statement, about how the procurement process has been designed<br />
and how it will be managed in order to achieve value for money for the<br />
community.<br />
Part 5: Probity of the NTS <strong>tender</strong><br />
5.3 When a value for money statement is published for a major <strong>tender</strong>, it should<br />
include the key elements of how the <strong>tender</strong> management team will manage<br />
real and perceived conflicts of interest.