25.07.2013 Views

long-term care - Legislative Reference Bureau

long-term care - Legislative Reference Bureau

long-term care - Legislative Reference Bureau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONCEPT OF A SINGLE ENTRY POINT<br />

and community-based (HCB) <strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong> services. In addition, 32 states use the personal<br />

<strong>care</strong> or case management option to provide at least one type of HCB <strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong>; 30<br />

states have opted to use both programs. 34<br />

For 1993, Medicaid expenditures for nursing homes accounted for 62 percent of its<br />

<strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong> spending. In<strong>term</strong>ediate <strong>care</strong> facilities for the mentally retarded (ICF-MR)<br />

spending accounted for 22 percent. The Home and Community Based waiver accounted for 7<br />

percent, closely followed by 6 percent for personal <strong>care</strong> services. Home health services<br />

accounted for the remaining 3 percent of Medicaid expenditures. 35 In 1990, the federal<br />

government spent about $4.5 billion for all state Medicaid programs in Region 9 comprising<br />

the four states of Hawaii, California, Arizona, and Nevada. About seven-eighths of this<br />

amount was spent in California. Federal Medicaid expenditures for Hawaii in 1990 amounted<br />

to $121,441,000 while California received $3,869,906,000. 36 Per capita federal expenditures<br />

for Medicaid for the United States in 1990 was $161.94, but only $109.58 for Hawaii.<br />

Corresponding per capita figures for the other three states in Region 9 amounted to: $130.04<br />

for California, $111.40 for Arizona, and $61.24 for Nevada. 37<br />

Almost one-third of the $450 billion spent annually on health <strong>care</strong> in the United States<br />

goes towards treatment of the elderly aged 65 and older, who represent just 12% of the<br />

population. The elderly represent two-thirds of the 8 million Americans who require <strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong><br />

<strong>care</strong>. Three-fourths of the disabled elderly live at home and rely on family members or other<br />

unpaid <strong>care</strong>givers. Some 1.6 million persons or 5% of the over-65 population lived in nursing<br />

homes in 1985 at a cost of more than $35 billion. Half of the elderly who enter homes<br />

eventually wind up on Medicaid. Private insurance covered only 1% of nursing home costs in<br />

1985. 38<br />

However, even though the subject is Medi<strong>care</strong> expenditures, according to a 1989<br />

article in State Government News: 39<br />

[I]t is not the elderly per se who are the heavy users of health <strong>care</strong> fmancing. It is<br />

the very sick and <strong>term</strong>inally ill, many of whom are also very old. In fact, analysis<br />

reveals that a very small percentage of the elderly are responsible for the high<br />

Medi<strong>care</strong> bills. According to the Health Care Financing Administration, in 1983<br />

.. , 2.3 percent of the 65 and older Medi<strong>care</strong> beneficiaries accounted for 33.9<br />

percent of program expenditures. Less than 10 percent of the beneficiaries<br />

accounted for more than 72 percent of the costs. A large portion of these<br />

expenditures is laid out for the <strong>term</strong>inally ill: 28 percent of the Medi<strong>care</strong> budget -approaching<br />

$25 billion -- is spent on patients who are in the final year of life.<br />

Screening and Functional Eligibility: In addition to financial eligibility, preadmission<br />

screening also involves functional eligibility de<strong>term</strong>ination. However, in addition to medical<br />

need, many state programs also look at a person's functional, psychological, and social<br />

status. In many states, one becomes eligible for community <strong>care</strong> programs only if one is<br />

already nursing home-eligible and, in most cases, the community <strong>care</strong> costs no more or less<br />

than nursing home <strong>care</strong>. The aim is to de<strong>term</strong>ine if a person can remain in the community<br />

and function successfully with the benefit of formal and informal community support services.<br />

Thus, community <strong>care</strong> programs -- of which screening is a part -- aim to integrate client<br />

access to both community and institutional <strong>care</strong>. Preadmission screening de<strong>term</strong>ines<br />

eligibility for nursing homes and informs of community alternatives. "Locating these<br />

screening programs in the same local agency that serves as the entry point for community<br />

<strong>care</strong> services increases the potential that clients will receive advice on a range of possible<br />

alternatives. "40<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!