25.07.2013 Views

long-term care - Legislative Reference Bureau

long-term care - Legislative Reference Bureau

long-term care - Legislative Reference Bureau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONCEPT OF A SINGLE ENTRY POINT<br />

eligibility for the elderly <strong>long</strong> <strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong> population. Ultimately, Oregon was<br />

allowed to create a single entry point, but had to agree to a state level paper review<br />

of eligibility decisions conducted retroactively.<br />

However, it is not always easy to combine both financial and functional eligibility<br />

de<strong>term</strong>inationwithin one access system. It was found that: 81<br />

Medicaid financial eligibility de<strong>term</strong>ination seems to be the function which is the<br />

most difficult to integrate with other access activities. . .. In states with mUltiple<br />

entry points, [attempts to maximize the use of state funds by trying to obtain<br />

Medicaid payment when clients appear to be Medicaid-eligible] means that clients<br />

must be referred by the case manager to another agency for Medicaid eligibility<br />

de<strong>term</strong>ination. . . . Depending on the complexity of the eligibility process,<br />

significant amounts of a case manager's time can be expended on this task [of<br />

assisting older people to complete the required paperwork for Medicaid<br />

enrollment]. . .. Older people themselves are the most negatively affected by these<br />

multiple referrals in most of the study states. Elderly <strong>long</strong> <strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong> clients have<br />

... limited capacities to maneuver through the process.<br />

Service Authorization -- Advocacy and Cost Control: The six state community <strong>care</strong><br />

systems reviewed in Justice, et al. place the power to authorize services within the local<br />

agency performing the entry process tasks of screening, assessment, and case<br />

management. 82 Because the assessment process leads to service authorization, the study<br />

states have consciously placed this function in agencies that do not directly provide publicly<br />

financed <strong>long</strong> <strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong> services. In four of the six states, assessments are performed by the<br />

same agency (and sometimes by the same staff) that provide ongoing case management. 83<br />

Being empowered to authorize services, case managers doubling as assessment staff<br />

reduce necessary bureaucracy and also directly affect program costs and service utilization: 84<br />

In managed systems of <strong>care</strong> financed by state resources and state administered<br />

federal funds such as Medicaid. state government can designate case management<br />

agencies to act as agents of the state in authorizing needed services. Without an<br />

explicit delegation of this authority case management agencies can help older<br />

. people locate services but cannot directly allocate public resources to individual <strong>care</strong><br />

plans.<br />

However, service authorization is almost always separated from actual service<br />

delivery. This helps to avoid conflicts of interest where case managers are also capable of<br />

providing direct services for clients they haye assessed. This separation also serves a cost<br />

containment function by requiring case managers to act as gatekeepers to control service<br />

utilization. At the same time, case managers (and assessment staff) can continue to fulfill an<br />

advocacy role by managing and coordinating needed <strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong> services for their clients.<br />

However, it is the former function of cost containment that is in the ascendancy. This<br />

is so because more and more community <strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong> is being offered under Medicaid<br />

waivers .. Medicaid waiver policy specifies that community <strong>care</strong> services for program clientele<br />

can be no more costly than nursing <strong>care</strong>. Besides limiting the average cost per case, some<br />

waiver programs also place a ceiling on expenditures for individual <strong>care</strong> plans. Such limits<br />

have also been adopted for some state-funded <strong>care</strong> programs. 85 In some cases, these<br />

waiver ceilings have been placed at some lower proportion of nursing home <strong>care</strong>. For<br />

example, Maine had at one time limited per case expenditures to 75 percent of nursing home<br />

costs. Arkansas had set the dollar cap at an amount equal to 80 percent of nursing home<br />

<strong>care</strong>. Wisconsin does not impose a ceiling on the cost of services by "requires within each<br />

county that on the average, program expenditures per client not exceed the state share of<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!