26.07.2013 Views

agribusiness development corporation: revisited - Legislative ...

agribusiness development corporation: revisited - Legislative ...

agribusiness development corporation: revisited - Legislative ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND STAKEHOLDERS IN THE AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY<br />

While we earlier noted that this study does not contain a detailed analysis of the annual<br />

legislative appropriations to an annual budget of ADC, in light of the collective call to increase<br />

funding to ADC by many respondents, including the ADC chairperson, it must be noted that over<br />

the four fiscal years ending June 30, 2005, ADC has had relatively substantial carry-over budget<br />

balances, as follows:<br />

2001-2002<br />

2002-2003<br />

2003-2004<br />

2004-2005<br />

$773,118<br />

745,592<br />

827,918<br />

897,924 2<br />

Executive Director Lee noted that he believed that, in fiscal year 2000-2001, ADC<br />

received an appropriation of $200,000 for the Hamakua agricultural subdivision project. That<br />

appropriation was not expended, although half of the appropriation was used in the Hawaii tea<br />

project. The remaining half of the Hamakua appropriation remains in ADC's coffers. Lee<br />

further noted that, for the last year, he has been trying to hire a person to fill a newly created<br />

project administrator position. To date, has been stymied by the state civil service laws and<br />

requirements. However, there still remain questions relating to these carry-over balances.<br />

Performance Standards<br />

One of the criticisms of ADC from its inception was the lack of written plans and<br />

standards for measuring the success or failure of a project or program. Recommendation 3 of the<br />

Bureau's earlier 1997 study was "to require ADC to prepare the kinds of written plans that will<br />

enable the ADC Board of Directors to monitor the status and evaluate the progress of any project<br />

or program, to approve or disapprove any project or program activity, to replicate any project or<br />

program at another place or time, and to advance any ongoing project or program to the next<br />

step, in the event that key professional staff leave the <strong>corporation</strong>. ,,3<br />

Several respondents indicate that the establishment of written plans and standards should<br />

be extended not just to evaluate projects and programs but also to impose standards and<br />

qualifications for all staff positions for the proper evaluation of personnel. Relating to project or<br />

program measurability, LURF comments:<br />

The reporting mechanism between ADC, ADC Board, and the Legislature needs to be<br />

improved. Defming roles and responsibilities, oversight, and accountability all need to<br />

be done as soon as possible. Progress then can be tracked and reported. To the extent<br />

2. ADC's annual budget summary referred to as the Agribusiness Development Revolving Fund, along with a<br />

summary of the Waiahole Water System Revolving Fund established pursuant to section 1630-15.5, HRS, for<br />

the operations and maintenance of that system, are found in Appendix K.<br />

3. Keith H. Fukumoto, Plan(ning) Is Not a Four-Letter Word: A Formative Evaluation of the Agribusiness<br />

Development Corporation, <strong>Legislative</strong> Reference Bureau, Report No.2 Honolulu: 1997, p. 50.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!