agribusiness development corporation: revisited - Legislative ...
agribusiness development corporation: revisited - Legislative ...
agribusiness development corporation: revisited - Legislative ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND STAKEHOLDERS IN THE AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY<br />
While we earlier noted that this study does not contain a detailed analysis of the annual<br />
legislative appropriations to an annual budget of ADC, in light of the collective call to increase<br />
funding to ADC by many respondents, including the ADC chairperson, it must be noted that over<br />
the four fiscal years ending June 30, 2005, ADC has had relatively substantial carry-over budget<br />
balances, as follows:<br />
2001-2002<br />
2002-2003<br />
2003-2004<br />
2004-2005<br />
$773,118<br />
745,592<br />
827,918<br />
897,924 2<br />
Executive Director Lee noted that he believed that, in fiscal year 2000-2001, ADC<br />
received an appropriation of $200,000 for the Hamakua agricultural subdivision project. That<br />
appropriation was not expended, although half of the appropriation was used in the Hawaii tea<br />
project. The remaining half of the Hamakua appropriation remains in ADC's coffers. Lee<br />
further noted that, for the last year, he has been trying to hire a person to fill a newly created<br />
project administrator position. To date, has been stymied by the state civil service laws and<br />
requirements. However, there still remain questions relating to these carry-over balances.<br />
Performance Standards<br />
One of the criticisms of ADC from its inception was the lack of written plans and<br />
standards for measuring the success or failure of a project or program. Recommendation 3 of the<br />
Bureau's earlier 1997 study was "to require ADC to prepare the kinds of written plans that will<br />
enable the ADC Board of Directors to monitor the status and evaluate the progress of any project<br />
or program, to approve or disapprove any project or program activity, to replicate any project or<br />
program at another place or time, and to advance any ongoing project or program to the next<br />
step, in the event that key professional staff leave the <strong>corporation</strong>. ,,3<br />
Several respondents indicate that the establishment of written plans and standards should<br />
be extended not just to evaluate projects and programs but also to impose standards and<br />
qualifications for all staff positions for the proper evaluation of personnel. Relating to project or<br />
program measurability, LURF comments:<br />
The reporting mechanism between ADC, ADC Board, and the Legislature needs to be<br />
improved. Defming roles and responsibilities, oversight, and accountability all need to<br />
be done as soon as possible. Progress then can be tracked and reported. To the extent<br />
2. ADC's annual budget summary referred to as the Agribusiness Development Revolving Fund, along with a<br />
summary of the Waiahole Water System Revolving Fund established pursuant to section 1630-15.5, HRS, for<br />
the operations and maintenance of that system, are found in Appendix K.<br />
3. Keith H. Fukumoto, Plan(ning) Is Not a Four-Letter Word: A Formative Evaluation of the Agribusiness<br />
Development Corporation, <strong>Legislative</strong> Reference Bureau, Report No.2 Honolulu: 1997, p. 50.<br />
25