26.07.2013 Views

Learning Analysis One Basic Components and Questions

Learning Analysis One Basic Components and Questions

Learning Analysis One Basic Components and Questions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>One</strong><br />

A hard copy of LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE is due on or before the end of Week Eight, Friday, March 1st, 3:00 P.M., at<br />

the latest, in AEB 228 or my office (AEB 236). The first complete draft does not receive a grade other than a number for<br />

the percent of the required components that are included in the first draft. Analyses submitted that do not include all of the<br />

required questions <strong>and</strong> components will not receive credit as a first draft. They will be returned without feedback <strong>and</strong> will<br />

receive a ‘0' for credit. They will need to be completed <strong>and</strong> resubmitted to receive credit as a first draft <strong>and</strong> be given<br />

feedback. You are expected to revise <strong>and</strong> rewrite your first complete draft of LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE for grades<br />

sometime before the end of the term. All final revisions are due on or before Friday, April 26th, 3:00 P.M., at the latest, in<br />

AEB 228 or my office (AEB 236). TO RECEIVE A GRADE FOR THE LEARNING ANALYSES PART OF THE<br />

OVERALL COURSE GRADE, YOU MUST SUBMIT A MINIMUM OF TWO VERSIONS OF LEARNING ANALYSIS<br />

ONE — A COMPLETE FIRST DRAFT THAT HAS RECEIVED CREDIT AND FEEDBACK AND A COMPLETE<br />

REVISION OF THE FIRST DRAFT. Generally speaking, you may revise LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE as often as we have<br />

time for you to make revisions, resubmit them, allow time for me to evaluate them, generate feedback for you regarding them, <strong>and</strong><br />

then return them to you. A hard copy of LEARNING ANALYSIS TWO is due by the Friday following finals week, May 3rd,<br />

3:00 P.M., at the latest, in AEB 228 or my office (AEB 236). It can be turned in earlier in AEB 228 or my office (AEB 236).<br />

Typically, your essays are assessed in terms of your use of the intellectual processes of conceptualization, definition, analysis,<br />

synthesis, evaluation, <strong>and</strong> application. As has been discussed in class, your responses should always be well-reasoned (logical),<br />

clear, precise, accurate, deep, significant, relevant, <strong>and</strong> consistent. Be sure you have successfully attended to the “Necessary Details<br />

for all Writing Assignments” discussed in the Course Syllabus.<br />

O Where appropriate, include specific examples <strong>and</strong> connections from your own experience to illustrate the personal relevance<br />

of the ideas <strong>and</strong> to add greater clarity to your explanations. Be sure you articulate how aspects of your example are<br />

specifically relevant to the points you are making in your analysis.<br />

O The audience you are to write for is made up of peers, family members, friends, <strong>and</strong> others who have little, if any, underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of the things you are studying for this assignment. Think of yourself as writing to this audience from the perspective of a budding<br />

behavioral <strong>and</strong> social scientist not just as a student in an upper-division, graduate-level course. Hence, your analytical <strong>and</strong><br />

evaluative reasoning <strong>and</strong> writing is critical. It must be explicit, thorough, <strong>and</strong> “spelled-out”.<br />

O Keep in mind that you are to demonstrate that you have acquired deeper <strong>and</strong> broader underst<strong>and</strong>ing from the materials we have<br />

been studying in our reading assignments <strong>and</strong> class discussions. Particularly, you need to discuss what has been altered in or<br />

added to your initial or prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing — the things you hadn’t seen or considered or understood before you discovered<br />

this insight (in relationship to what you believed, thought, <strong>and</strong> understood before you discovered your insight).<br />

O Carefully select quotations that contain the most specific, essential, <strong>and</strong> critical information (i.e., your “data” <strong>and</strong> “evidence”)<br />

from the readings that help you clearly, precisely, <strong>and</strong> deeply articulate <strong>and</strong> analyze your insight <strong>and</strong> increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />

Some quotes will be far more pertinent than others to the logic <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s of your questions <strong>and</strong> analysis.<br />

O In the body of your writing, any reference you make to a particular phrase, sentence, or quote from an author should include the<br />

last name of the author(s), year of publication, <strong>and</strong> the page number(s) where the quote can be found in parentheses. Include<br />

a complete reference for each phrase, sentence, quote or definition in a footnote, an endnote, or a reference page. See the section<br />

in the syllabus entitled “NECESSARY DETAILS FOR ALL WRITING ASSIGNMENTS” for guidelines on referencing.<br />

<strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Components</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Questions</strong><br />

If you have increased your underst<strong>and</strong>ing about something <strong>and</strong> acquired insight about it, it will have a wholeness to it. Consequently,<br />

you should be able to articulate <strong>and</strong> explain your insight or enlightenment regarding the main idea <strong>and</strong> (1) its essential parts by<br />

themselves, (2) the important relationships between the parts, <strong>and</strong> (3) how your underst<strong>and</strong>ing from 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 helps increase your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the whole (i.e., helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment about your insights).<br />

(Q1) YOUR MOST SIGNIFICANT INSIGHT. From your reading <strong>and</strong> our discussion of relevant content in Newberg <strong>and</strong><br />

Waldman’s book, Born to believe, identify, explain, <strong>and</strong> analyze EITHER [a] the most significant insight you have acquired<br />

so far this term about your underst<strong>and</strong>ing of what it means to be open-minded <strong>and</strong> what you would need to do to become<br />

more open-minded OR [b] the most significant insight you have acquired so far this term about your underst<strong>and</strong>ing of what<br />

it means to be a better believer <strong>and</strong> what you would need to do to become a better believer OR [c] SOME<br />

COMBINATION OF BOTH a <strong>and</strong> b. DEPENDING ON WHICH OPTION YOU SELECT, it will be helpful for you<br />

to also consider, think, <strong>and</strong> write about your answers to the following related questions: What does it mean to be closed-


minded? What is a believer? What is a bad or not-so-good believer? How is being more open-minded related to becoming<br />

a better believer? Etc. It may be useful for you to think of this assignment as a TAKE-HOME EXAM in which you write<br />

about the most important <strong>and</strong> specific things you have learned about the assigned questions from your study of Newberg <strong>and</strong><br />

Waldman’s book. The focus is on what you have learned directly from the authors <strong>and</strong> how it has increased your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing. They have quite a few very clear <strong>and</strong> specific ideas about these questions. Therefore, I will be looking for<br />

them amongst your selection of quotes <strong>and</strong> your analysis. Include the following components in your analysis.<br />

(A) REQUIRED PRELIMINARY DOCUMENTATION. Prepare the following preliminary documents. Use the derived<br />

information in your analysis where it applies, <strong>and</strong> submit the completed documents with your analysis. (It is acceptable<br />

to cut, paste, edit, <strong>and</strong> explain in greater depth the content from these documents into the body of your essay.)<br />

OUTLINE. Include an outline that includes (1) a statement identifying your main insight (in 50 words or less); (2) the<br />

two or three most essential parts of the insight by themselves; <strong>and</strong> (3) the most important relationships between the<br />

parts.<br />

LISTING OF RELEVANT QUOTES, WORDS, AND DEFINITIONS. (1) Identify <strong>and</strong> write down the quotation<br />

you plan to analyze. (2) List the words <strong>and</strong> the corresponding relevant definitional phrases that you will analyze <strong>and</strong><br />

clearly identify which of the words is the synonym you will analyze. (3) Include a list of a minimum of an additional<br />

four phrases, sentences, <strong>and</strong>/or paragraphs from our reading assignments that you will use in completing component<br />

E — to help you identify, explain, <strong>and</strong> support your insight <strong>and</strong> analysis. (4) Include complete references for each quote<br />

(phrase, sentence, <strong>and</strong>/or paragraph) <strong>and</strong> each definitional phrase <strong>and</strong> synonym.<br />

(B) DISCUSSION OF PRIOR UNDERSTANDING. (1) What was your initial or prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the important<br />

ideas <strong>and</strong> terms from the quotations <strong>and</strong> author <strong>and</strong> dictionary definitions that you choose to analyze <strong>and</strong> (2) why did<br />

you think these things? Explain what your prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based on <strong>and</strong> where your thinking came from.<br />

(C) ANALYSIS OF QUOTATION. Integrate into your essay a thorough analysis <strong>and</strong> explanation of how the most<br />

significant words, phrases, <strong>and</strong>/or sentences from at least one quotation from our reading assignments in Newberg <strong>and</strong><br />

Waldman’s book deepened <strong>and</strong> broadened your enlightenment about your insight. To do this, (1) first clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

precisely explain what the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases of the quote or definition mean to the author or source (i.e., what the<br />

author is telling you are the specific ideas behind the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases); (2) second, clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely explain<br />

what you learned from the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases that you didn’t know or underst<strong>and</strong> before your study of them; (3)<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely explain how this meaning is relevant to the particular selected quote <strong>and</strong> your insight; <strong>and</strong> (4) how<br />

it deepened <strong>and</strong> broadened your enlightenment about the quotation <strong>and</strong> your insight.<br />

(D) DEFINE AND ANALYZE CRITICAL TERM. Using relevant phrases <strong>and</strong> synonyms from at least one good<br />

dictionary <strong>and</strong> one good thesaurus, define <strong>and</strong> analyze thoroughly at least one word, term, or concept (<strong>and</strong> three other<br />

related useful words or concepts including one relevant synonym) from the quotation you have selected, <strong>and</strong> integrate<br />

what you learn about the definitions in your discussion. (1) Clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely explain what the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases<br />

of the quote or definition mean to the author or source (i.e., what the author or source is telling you are the specific ideas<br />

behind the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases). (2) Explain how the things you learn from the relevant content selected from the<br />

dictionary <strong>and</strong> thesaurus about the words, terms, or concepts deepened <strong>and</strong> broadened your enlightenment about the<br />

quotation <strong>and</strong> your insight.<br />

(E) EXPLAIN SUPPORTIVE CONTENT FROM RELATED QUOTES. Integrate into your analysis a discussion of<br />

a minimum of an additional four related phrases, sentences, <strong>and</strong>/or paragraphs from our reading assignments in Newberg<br />

<strong>and</strong> Waldman’s book (other than the phrase, sentence, or paragraph you analyze in component C above) that help you<br />

explain <strong>and</strong> support your insight <strong>and</strong> analysis. Explain how the things you learn from the relevant content of these<br />

supportive quotes are relevant to the analysis of your quotation <strong>and</strong> insight <strong>and</strong> how they deepened <strong>and</strong> broadened your<br />

enlightenment about the quotation <strong>and</strong> your insight.<br />

(Q2) As part of the conclusion to your analytical essay, answer the So what? question <strong>and</strong> its related questions: What difference<br />

does your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing make in your current thinking about the things you consider to be most relevant to your<br />

learning? How is your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing relevant to you <strong>and</strong> your life? Compare <strong>and</strong> contrast your prior thinking with your<br />

newly acquired <strong>and</strong> more enlightened thinking. What can you do with what you now know? How does it affect the way you<br />

perceive <strong>and</strong> think about relevant things?


REVISIONS OF LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE<br />

As I hope you already know, you will need to rewrite or revise all of your LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE before or by the end<br />

of the term in order to receive a grade for your analysis. Please remember that the first complete draft does not receive a grade. All<br />

final revisions are due on or before Friday, April 26th, 3:00 P.M., at the latest, in AEB 228 or my office (AEB 236).<br />

Revisions may be turned in earlier in class, AEB 228, or my office (AEB 236). You will also receive a grade for the quality of<br />

your revisions. (See relevant grading rubric below.) Consequently, one of the most important tasks of the revision process is to<br />

correct mistakes, include page numbering <strong>and</strong> prior omissions, be sure all required parts, components, <strong>and</strong> responses to questions<br />

have been included, <strong>and</strong> carefully proofread the text of your analysis, outline, list of quotations, <strong>and</strong> references. Failure to do so will<br />

significantly decrease your grades. Generally speaking, you may revise LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE as often as we have time<br />

for you to make revisions, submit them, allow time for me to evaluate them, generate feedback for you regarding them, <strong>and</strong> then<br />

return them to you. Each time you turn-in your LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE after you have made revisions, please submit the<br />

following:<br />

1. In all of your revisions, PLEASE PRINT IN CAPS (or some other form of emphasis such as underlining or a distinctly<br />

different font or highlight in a different color) ALL OF THE CONTENT YOU ADD IN YOUR REVISING to the previous<br />

version of your responses.<br />

2. THE FEEDBACK/GRADING SHEETS I HANDED BACK TO YOU<br />

3. YOUR PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF YOUR LEARNING ANALYSIS<br />

4. A PRINTED HARD COPY OF THE MOST RECENTLY REVISED VERSION OF YOUR LEARNING ANALYSIS<br />

ESSAY, OUTLINE, AND REFERENCE PAGE.<br />

I need all of these elements to be included with your revisions or I will not be able to grade them completely!! Be sure you<br />

have corrected all of your previous mistakes, included page numbering <strong>and</strong> prior omissions. Be sure all required parts,<br />

components, <strong>and</strong> responses to questions have been included. And carefully proofread the text of your analysis, outline, list<br />

of quotations, <strong>and</strong> references before submitting your revisions. Thanks! Your grades will appreciate your attention,<br />

accuracy, precision, <strong>and</strong> efforts in these regards.<br />

REVISION QUALITY. How effectively did you respond to previous feedback? Did you provide ample evidence of rethinking the assigned<br />

questions, your responses to them, <strong>and</strong> your insight in terms of how they are addressed, explained, analyzed? Does your new content add depth,<br />

breadth, detail, clarity, precision or is it more information at the same level? Is your increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> learning directly identified,<br />

explained, <strong>and</strong> thoroughly analyzed?<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

There is no<br />

evidence of<br />

changes in your<br />

most recent<br />

version of the LA<br />

other than<br />

cosmetic, basic<br />

corrections. Few if<br />

any previously<br />

omitted<br />

components have<br />

been added.<br />

BASICS of<br />

revisions not<br />

included.<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

There is no evidence<br />

of rethinking<br />

questions,<br />

responses, quotes<br />

<strong>and</strong> insight in how<br />

they are addressed,<br />

explained, analyzed<br />

in new content.<br />

Many corrections<br />

ignored. Most<br />

changes are<br />

cosmetic, basic<br />

corrections. Few<br />

previously omitted<br />

components have<br />

been added. BASICS<br />

of revisions not<br />

included.<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

There is some evidence of<br />

rethinking questions,<br />

responses, quotes <strong>and</strong> insight<br />

in how they are addressed,<br />

explained, analyzed in new<br />

content. Some corrections<br />

ignored. Many changes are<br />

cosmetic <strong>and</strong> basic<br />

corrections. Some previously<br />

omitted components have<br />

been added. Added<br />

information stays on the<br />

same level as before. No<br />

increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong><br />

learning is evident. BASICS of<br />

revisions may or may not<br />

have been included.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

There is considerable<br />

evidence of rethinking<br />

questions, responses,<br />

quotes <strong>and</strong> insight in how<br />

they are addressed,<br />

explained, analyzed in<br />

new content. Necessary<br />

corrections have been<br />

made <strong>and</strong> previously<br />

omitted components have<br />

been added. Much of new<br />

content adds depth,<br />

breadth, detail, clarity,<br />

precision. Increased<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong><br />

learning is identified,<br />

discussed, <strong>and</strong> explained.<br />

BASICS of revisions<br />

included.<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

There is a lot of evidence of<br />

rethinking questions,<br />

responses, quotes <strong>and</strong><br />

insight in how they are<br />

addressed, explained,<br />

analyzed in new content.<br />

Necessary corrections have<br />

been made <strong>and</strong> previously<br />

omitted components have<br />

been added. New content<br />

adds much more depth,<br />

breadth, detail, clarity,<br />

precision. Increased<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> learning<br />

is clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

identified, discussed, <strong>and</strong><br />

explained. BASICS of<br />

revisions included.


STATEMENT IDENTIFYING MAIN INSIGHT (in 50 words or less):<br />

We can be more open-minded by (1) learning from others by skeptically studying different points of view, (2) “questioning our own<br />

beliefs” to determine their strengths <strong>and</strong> limitations, <strong>and</strong> (3) discover <strong>and</strong> “override” our “biologically based cognitive biases.” (38<br />

words)<br />

TWO OR THREE MOST ESSENTIAL PARTS BY THEMSELVES<br />

A. learning from others by skeptically studying different points of view<br />

B. “questioning our own beliefs” to determine their strengths <strong>and</strong> limitations<br />

C. discover <strong>and</strong> “override” our “biologically based cognitive biases”<br />

MOST IMPORTANT RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE PARTS<br />

AB. “by questioning our own beliefs <strong>and</strong> recognizing their limits, we open ourselves to exploring different systems of belief”<br />

AC. discovering <strong>and</strong> overriding our “biologically based cognitive biases” helps us to not dismiss, disparage, or reject beliefs<br />

different from our own<br />

MAIN QUOTATION TO BE ANALYZED<br />

Newberg, Andrew, <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman. (2007.) “The power of belief” in Born to believe: God, science, <strong>and</strong> the origin of<br />

ordinary <strong>and</strong> extraordinary beliefs. New York, NY: The Free Press (Simon & Schuster), 10.<br />

<strong>One</strong> thing we can do is train ourselves to become more vigilant <strong>and</strong> cautious. Adopt a skeptical, open-minded attitude.…A skeptic<br />

is simply a person who chooses to examine carefully whether his or her beliefs are actually true. A skeptic keeps an open mind —<br />

a willingness to consider both sides of an argument.<br />

FOUR CRITICAL WORDS TO BE ANALYZED<br />

1. Open-minded<br />

DICTIONARY ONE PHRASE THAT INCREASED MY UNDERSTANDING: Having or showing receptiveness to new <strong>and</strong><br />

different ideas or the opinions of others. [American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Houghton Mifflin, 2009.<br />

Retrieved September 27, 2012, from http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/open-minded]<br />

DICTIONARY TWO PHRASE THAT INCREASED MY UNDERSTANDING: not having preconceptions or prejudgments; receptive;<br />

tolerant; impartial. [Wordsmyth Online English Dictionary - Thesaurus, The Wordsmyth Organization, 2012. Retrieved September 27, 2012,<br />

from http://www.wordsmyth.net/?ent=open-minded]<br />

2. Skeptical<br />

DICTIONARY PHRASE THAT INCREASED MY UNDERSTANDING: Marked by or given to doubt; questioning. [American<br />

Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Houghton Mifflin, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from<br />

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/skeptical]<br />

3. Vigilant<br />

DICTIONARY PHRASE THAT INCREASED MY UNDERSTANDING: On the alert; watchful. See Synonyms at aware. [American<br />

Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Houghton Mifflin, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from<br />

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/vigilant]<br />

4. Aware (synonym of vigilant)<br />

DICTIONARY PHRASE THAT INCREASED MY UNDERSTANDING: 1. Having knowledge or cognizance. 2. Archaic Vigilant; watchful.<br />

[American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Houghton Mifflin, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from<br />

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry?id=A0551800]<br />

SYNONYM THAT INCREASED MY UNDERSTANDING: AWARE. These adjectives [aware, cognizant, conscious, sensible,<br />

awake, alert, watchful, vigilant] mean mindful or heedful: AWARE implies knowledge gained through one's own perceptions or<br />

by means of information. Watchful <strong>and</strong> VIGILANT imply looking out for what is dangerous or potentially so. [American Heritage®<br />

Dictionary of the English Language, Houghton Mifflin, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from<br />

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry?id=A0551800]


FOUR QUOTATIONS TO BE USED FOR SUPPORT<br />

(Plus two extra that you don’t have to include. I found all six useful, so I would include all six in my analysis. You need to include<br />

only four quotes for supportive purposes.)<br />

Newberg, Andrew, <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman. (2007.) “Preface” in Born to believe: God, science, <strong>and</strong> the origin of ordinary <strong>and</strong><br />

extraordinary beliefs. New York, NY: The Free Press (Simon & Schuster), xix.<br />

…Although we are designed to have beliefs, all beliefs have limitations, <strong>and</strong> every one of them contains assumptions <strong>and</strong><br />

inaccuracies concerning the true nature of the world.<br />

Newberg, Andrew, <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman. (2007.) “The power of belief” in Born to believe: God, science, <strong>and</strong> the origin of<br />

ordinary <strong>and</strong> extraordinary beliefs. New York, NY: The Free Press (Simon & Schuster), 5-6.<br />

Once our beliefs are established, we rarely challenge their validity, even when faced with contradictory evidence. Thus, when we<br />

encounter others who appear to hold differing beliefs, we tend to dismiss or disparage them.…Our brains are instinctually prone<br />

to reject information that does not conform to our prior experience <strong>and</strong> knowledge.<br />

Newberg, Andrew, <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman. (2007.) “Santa Claus, lucky numbers, <strong>and</strong> the magician in our brain: The biology<br />

of conceptual beliefs” in Born to believe: God, science, <strong>and</strong> the origin of ordinary <strong>and</strong> extraordinary beliefs. New York, NY: The<br />

Free Press (Simon & Schuster), 90.<br />

When we are faced with any belief that conflicts with our own, it takes additional effort <strong>and</strong> time to override these biologically<br />

based cognitive biases, but by doing so, we can become more open-minded.…History, of course, reminds us how hard it is to<br />

maintain an open mind.<br />

Newberg, Andrew, <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman. (2007.) “Becoming a better believer” in Born to believe: God, science, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

origin of ordinary <strong>and</strong> extraordinary beliefs. New York, NY: The Free Press (Simon & Schuster), 260.<br />

…Be open to modifying your beliefs. Then ask more questions, for questions help exp<strong>and</strong> your perceptions of the world. Approach<br />

your questioning with enthusiasm for finding truth rather than a desire to denigrate <strong>and</strong> tear down other people’s beliefs.<br />

Extra quotes of support for discussion of differences new thinking makes. You do not need to include more than four quotes<br />

for support in addition to the main quote you plan to analyze.<br />

Newberg, Andrew, <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman. (2007.) “The power of belief” in Born to believe: God, science, <strong>and</strong> the origin of<br />

ordinary <strong>and</strong> extraordinary beliefs. New York, NY: The Free Press (Simon & Schuster), 6.<br />

If we underst<strong>and</strong> the neuropsychology of the brain, our beliefs will be able to grow <strong>and</strong> change as we interact with others who have<br />

different views of the world. It is my hope that as we become better believers, we will exercise greater compassion in our search<br />

for meaning <strong>and</strong> truth.<br />

Newberg, Andrew, <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman. (2007.) “Becoming a better believer” in Born to believe: God, science, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

origin of ordinary <strong>and</strong> extraordinary beliefs. New York, NY: The Free Press (Simon & Schuster), 265.<br />

By questioning our own beliefs <strong>and</strong> recognizing their limits, we open ourselves to exploring different systems of belief. And as<br />

we learn from others, the boundaries that normally separate us begin to dissolve.


Related Content From Course Syllabus<br />

GRADING EXPLANATION. Typically, you are encouraged to include three different emphases in all of your writing <strong>and</strong><br />

communicating in our class. These emphases are: (1) demonstrating what you learn <strong>and</strong> come to know, how/why your learning<br />

is important <strong>and</strong> relevant to you, <strong>and</strong> what makes it worth learning; (2) doing something with what you learn <strong>and</strong> come to know<br />

by articulating changes you could consider making to improve things as they are in your thinking <strong>and</strong> in the things that you do,<br />

the implications for you <strong>and</strong> important others of taking your changes seriously if they were implemented, <strong>and</strong> the opposition from<br />

yourself <strong>and</strong> others you could anticipate to your recommendations <strong>and</strong> your response to this opposition; <strong>and</strong> (3) your use of good<br />

reasoning <strong>and</strong> intellectual processes such as explaining, analyzing, synthesizing, evaluating, <strong>and</strong> applying with clarity, precision,<br />

accuracy, consistency, depth, breadth, <strong>and</strong> careful reasoning. These are all things our class is designed to help you learn to do.<br />

GRADING SCALE. Your final course grade is computed using various weights for the different types of class assignments.<br />

Letter grades are assigned to percentages according to the scales listed below.<br />

GRADE “ - ” Range Letter only “ + ” Range<br />

A = EXCELLENT 90 - 93.9 % 94 - 100 %<br />

B = GOOD 80 - 83.9 % 84 - 86.9 % 87 - 89.9 %<br />

C = ADEQUATE 70 - 73.9 % 74 - 76.9 % 77 - 79.9 %<br />

D = INADEQUATE 60 - 63.9 % 64 - 66.9 % 67 - 69.9 %<br />

E = NO GRADE < 60 %<br />

LEARNING ANALYSES are evaluated according to the degree to which particular requirements of the assignment are<br />

included <strong>and</strong> how well they are demonstrated. An ‘A’ means the criteria for the requirement were met thoroughly <strong>and</strong> an ‘E’<br />

means the criteria were not met at all. A letter grade of ‘A’ is given for excellent performance <strong>and</strong> superior achievement; a ‘B’<br />

for good performance <strong>and</strong> substantial achievement; a ‘C’ for st<strong>and</strong>ard performance <strong>and</strong> achievement; a ‘D’ response for<br />

subst<strong>and</strong>ard performance <strong>and</strong> marginal achievement; <strong>and</strong> an ‘E’ response for unsatisfactory performance <strong>and</strong> achievement.<br />

Generally speaking, when evaluating an assignment, if I cannot find evidence that the requested information, explanation, or<br />

analysis was provided or required questions were answered, that particular part of the assignment receives an ‘E’ for a grade.<br />

A ‘D’ or ‘C’ is earned where I find responses to be characterized by any of the following:<br />

1. simply stated the obvious; only described things; summarized, reported, reiterated, repeated, restated, reworded, or rephrased<br />

what the text <strong>and</strong>/or others have already said;<br />

2. discussed something only in terms of whether or not you agreed or disagreed with it; approved or disapproved of it; liked<br />

or disliked it;<br />

3. stated as facts your conclusions, assertions, opinions, viewpoints, beliefs, etc. without qualifications, support, evidence, <strong>and</strong><br />

relevant justifications;<br />

4. treated something problematic or complex as if it were simple, straightforward, self-evident, one-sided.<br />

Responses earn a ‘B’ when they specifically <strong>and</strong> clearly explain <strong>and</strong> analyze major points, conclusions, <strong>and</strong> how they were<br />

determined. An ‘A’ for a response is earned only when explanations <strong>and</strong> analyses include depth <strong>and</strong> personal insights.<br />

NECESSARY DETAILS FOR ALL WRITING ASSIGNMENTS. To help you be thorough <strong>and</strong> careful in your attention<br />

to very basic elements of written communication, please attend to the seven details listed below in your assignments. If they are<br />

omitted your assignment will not receive full credit <strong>and</strong> may be returned to you to be completed <strong>and</strong> resubmitted before it<br />

receives any credit. While attention to such details may seem unimportant to you, I assure you that the inclusion of each item<br />

makes an important contribution to the successful completion of a relevant piece of written communication from you to me or<br />

other members of the class.<br />

1. Please word-process (or type) your work if at all possible. WEEKLY QUOTES AND INSIGHTS can be single-spaced<br />

<strong>and</strong> LEARNING ANALYSES should be double-spaced. Proofread <strong>and</strong> edit all of your work before you turn it in <strong>and</strong> check<br />

for possible errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, wording, <strong>and</strong> sentence structure. Be sure you save or back-up your<br />

work every few minutes as you are word processing.


2. Please put your name, the name <strong>and</strong> number of the course, the name of the assignment, <strong>and</strong> the date of the day you complete<br />

the assignment at the top of your first page.<br />

3. Please number your pages <strong>and</strong> put them in order when you turn in an assignment that is longer than one page.<br />

4. You do not need to submit your assignments in files, folders, binders, or notebooks. A staple or paper-clip on the top lefth<strong>and</strong><br />

corner of your printed pages will be sufficient.<br />

5. Any time a quotation is used in an assignment, the reference to it should include the following elements in an endnote,<br />

footnote, or reference list: Î full name(s) of the author(s); Ï the full or complete title of the article or chapter; Ð the full<br />

or complete title of the book or publication the article or chapter came from <strong>and</strong> the names of the author (s)/editor(s) of the<br />

book if they are not the same as Î above; Ñ the year of publication; Ò the place (e.g., city, state) of publication; Ó the name<br />

of the publisher; <strong>and</strong> Ô the page number(s) where the quote can be found. Two additional elements are necessary if the<br />

reading is on the internet or web: Õ the date that you last retrieved the article or reading on the internet or web; <strong>and</strong> Ö the<br />

URL or address on the web for the article or reading in which the quote is located. In the body of your writing, the reference<br />

for the quote should include the last name of the author(s), year of publication, <strong>and</strong> the page number(s) where the quote can<br />

be found.<br />

If, for example, the quote was from page 11 of Born to believe: God, science, <strong>and</strong> the origin of ordinary <strong>and</strong><br />

extraordinary beliefs by Andrew Newberg <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman, you could write the reference in the body<br />

of your writing as (Newberg <strong>and</strong> Waldman, 2007, 11) <strong>and</strong> the reference in a reference page would look like the<br />

following:<br />

Newberg, Andrew, <strong>and</strong> Mark Robert Waldman. (2007). “The power of belief” in Born to believe: God,<br />

science, <strong>and</strong> the origin of ordinary <strong>and</strong> extraordinary beliefs. New York, NY: The Free Press (Simon<br />

& Schuster), 11.<br />

In the case of a quote from a chapter that is in a book of readings, the reference is a little more complex. If the<br />

quote you have selected is on page 33 of Feuds about families: Conservative, centrist, liberal, <strong>and</strong> feminist<br />

perspectives by Nijole Benokraitis, a useful way to write the reference in the body of your writing is (Fagan, as<br />

quoted in Benokraitis, 2000, 33). The reference in a reference page could appear like so:<br />

Fagan, Patrick F. (2000). “The breakdown of the family” in Nijole V. Benokraitis, Feuds about families:<br />

Conservative, centrist, liberal, <strong>and</strong> feminist perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 33.<br />

If the quote was from page 111 of the article by William Meezan <strong>and</strong> Jonathan Rauch that is available on the web,<br />

you could write the reference in the body of your writing as (Meezan <strong>and</strong> Rauch, 2005, 111). The reference page<br />

entry could be written as follows:<br />

Meezan, William, <strong>and</strong> Jonathan Rauch. (2005). “Gay marriage, same-sex parenting, <strong>and</strong> America’s<br />

children” The Future of Children, Fall 2005, 15(2), 111. Retrieved December 6, 2010 from<br />

http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/future_of_children/v015/15.2meezan.html.<br />

6. Be certain that you respond to <strong>and</strong> complete all assigned questions, components, <strong>and</strong> their subparts. Pieces of work turned-in<br />

that omit important assigned components are likely to be returned without credit until they are completed <strong>and</strong> resubmitted.<br />

These resubmitted assignments will be considered late.<br />

APA Style of Referencing a Dictionary in footnotes, endnotes, or a reference page<br />

In Print<br />

Examples of citing a general dictionary with <strong>and</strong> without an editor:<br />

Weber, C. (Ed.). (2002). Webster's dictionary (4th ed., Vols. 1-4). Chicago: Webster Press.<br />

Oxford dictionary (7th ed.). (2000). Hinsdale, IL: Penguin Press.<br />

Example of citing a specific dictionary entry with <strong>and</strong> without an editor:<br />

Quixotic. (1990). In N. Taparia (Ed.), Oxford dictionary (p. 345, 3rd ed., vol. 5). New York: Oxford Press.<br />

Quixotic. (1990). Oxford dictionary (p. 345, 3rd ed., vol. 5). New York: Oxford Press.<br />

Online<br />

Virulent. (2000). Dictionary.com. Lexico Publishing Group. Retrieved August 30, 2005, from<br />

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=virulent<br />

Tips & Warnings<br />

The date of publication is often not listed. If this is the case, use the abbreviation "n.d." (which st<strong>and</strong>s for "no date").<br />

The date listed in the actual definition is not the date of publication, but the date of earliest use. Do not use this in your citation.


TO BE INFORMED VS. TO BE ENLIGHTENED<br />

Excerpts from Mortimer J. Adler <strong>and</strong> Charles Van Doren (1972), How to read a book, revised <strong>and</strong> updated edition. New York:<br />

Touchstone, 11.<br />

Getting more information is learning, <strong>and</strong> so is coming to underst<strong>and</strong> what you did not underst<strong>and</strong> before. But there is an<br />

important difference between these two kinds of learning. To be informed is to know simply that something is the case. To be<br />

enlightened is to know, in addition, what it is all about: why it is the case, what its connections are with other facts, in what<br />

respects it is the same, in what respects it is different, <strong>and</strong> so forth.<br />

This distinction is familiar in terms of the differences between being able to remember something <strong>and</strong> being able to explain it.<br />

If you remember what an author says, you have learned something from reading him. If what he says is true, you have even<br />

learned something about the world. But whether it is a fact about the book or a fact about the world that you have learned, you<br />

have gained nothing but information if you have exercised only your memory.<br />

You have not been enlightened. Enlightenment is achieved only when, in addition to knowing what an author says, you know<br />

what he means <strong>and</strong> why he says it.…Being informed is prerequisite to being enlightened. The point, however, is not to stop at<br />

being informed.<br />

SELECTION OF CONTENT<br />

QUESTIONS TO ASK YOURSELF<br />

Are you seeking to be informed or enlightened? (see quote above)<br />

Does your selection help you be informed or enlightened?<br />

FROM THE AUTHOR<br />

What does the insight, quote, or definition tell you on its own terms <strong>and</strong> logic?<br />

What do you underst<strong>and</strong> the author to be saying?<br />

What are the important underlying ideas?<br />

YOUR INTERPRETATION<br />

What does this mean to you? What does it add or alter to what you already know?<br />

What did you think about this before? What was the basis for your prior thinking?<br />

How is this similar to your prior thinking?<br />

How is this different from your prior thinking?<br />

What connections does this suggest or make for you?<br />

What do you underst<strong>and</strong> more deeply <strong>and</strong> broadly because of this?<br />

What do you now wonder because of this.


QUOTE OR PHRASE ONE:<br />

— LIST SEPARATELY EACH OF<br />

— THE VARIOUS THINGS<br />

— YOU LEARNED FROM THE<br />

— QUOTE OR PHRASE.<br />

WORD ONE:<br />

— LIST EACH OF<br />

— THE THINGS YOU<br />

— LEARNED ABOUT<br />

— THIS WORD.<br />

WHAT ELSE CAN I DO?<br />

WORD TWO:<br />

— LIST EACH OF<br />

— THE THINGS YOU<br />

— LEARNED ABOUT<br />

— THIS WORD.<br />

QUOTE OR PHRASE TWO:<br />

— LIST SEPARATELY EACH OF<br />

— THE VARIOUS THINGS<br />

— YOU LEARNED FROM THE<br />

— QUOTE OR PHRASE.<br />

WORD THREE:<br />

— LIST EACH OF<br />

— THE THINGS YOU<br />

— LEARNED ABOUT<br />

— THIS WORD.<br />

AFTER YOU HAVE LISTED A BUNCH OF SPECIFIC THINGS YOU HAVE LEARNED FROM YOUR PARTICULAR<br />

SELECTION OF QUOTES, PHRASES, AND WORDS, RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.<br />

WHICH OF ALL THESE THINGS DID YOU KNOW BEFORE?<br />

WHICH OF ALL THESE THINGS DID YOU NOT KNOW BEFORE?<br />

WHICH OF ALL THESE THINGS DO YOU NOW UNDERSTAND DIFFERENTLY? WHAT IS DIFFERENT? WHAT<br />

DIFFERENCE DOES THIS “DIFFERENCE” MAKE?<br />

WHICH OF ALL THESE THINGS DEEPENED YOUR UNDERSTANDING? WHAT DEEPENED?<br />

WHICH OF ALL THESE THINGS BROADENED YOUR UNDERSTANDING? WHAT BROADENED?<br />

WHAT DID YOU THINK BEFORE? WHY DID YOU THINK THAT?<br />

NOW WHAT DO YOU THINK? WHY DO YOU THINK THAT?<br />

SO WHAT CAN YOU DO WITH WHAT YOU NOW KNOW THAT YOU DIDN’T DO BEFORE BECAUSE YOU DIDN’T<br />

KNOW IT UNTIL NOW?


FCS 3240 — LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE FEEDBACK: BASICS<br />

BASICS. You are attentive to correct grammar, punctuation, word-selection, sentence structure, spelling, referencing, proof-reading, etc., or your<br />

writing has problems in the following areas:<br />

F GRAMMAR F PUNCTUATION F WORDING F SENTENCE-STRUCTURE F SPELLING F MISQUOTING F REFERENCING F PROOF-READING<br />

You are attentive to necessary details <strong>and</strong> include all assigned components or you have omitted or not completed necessary details <strong>and</strong>/or assigned<br />

components. LEARNING ANALYSES turned-in that omit too many necessary details <strong>and</strong>/or assigned components are highly likely to be returned<br />

without credit until they are completed <strong>and</strong> resubmitted. These resubmitted assignments will be considered late.<br />

— submitted work is word-processed or typed F ALL PARTS ARE WP/T F SOME PARTS ARE WP/T F FEW OR NO PARTS ARE WP/T<br />

— put pages in order <strong>and</strong> include page numbering F PAGES OUT OF ORDER F PAGE NUMBERS OMITTED<br />

— include outline of insight, parts, important relationship(s) F STATED INSIGHT F PARTS F RELATIONSHIPS F NOT SURE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of four words F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of relevant definitions F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of relevant references F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate dictionary references in text F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of all relevant quotes F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of relevant references F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate references in text F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— use one dictionary for each of four words defined/analyzed F NO DICTIONARY EVIDENT F SYNONYM LISTED/IDENTIFIED F NO SYNONYM<br />

(1 critical word; 3 related words including synonym) F DID SYNONYM F DID 3 WORDS F DID 2 WORDS F DID 1 WORD F ALL OMITTED<br />

— thoroughly analyze one quote F LISTED F IDENTIFIED – NOT LISTED F NOT IDENTIFIED QUOTE ANALYZED: F NOT SURE F OMITTED<br />

— include four quotes for support F DID 4 QUOTES F DID 3 QUOTES F DID 2 QUOTES F DID 1 QUOTE F NOT SURE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include complete <strong>and</strong> accurate references for quotes <strong>and</strong> definitions in a reference page or bibliography<br />

F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

NO CREDIT:<br />

CORRECT AND<br />

RESUBMIT ASAP<br />

0 50 57<br />

You do not convey<br />

an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

this assignment<br />

<strong>and</strong> its<br />

requirements. You<br />

have omitted all of<br />

the required<br />

elements of this<br />

assignment.<br />

MINIMAL CREDIT: MANY<br />

CORRECTIONS NECESSARY<br />

WITH REVISIONS<br />

60 64 67<br />

You have far too many<br />

grammatical, proofreading,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or spelling<br />

errors. It is difficult to<br />

follow your thinking<br />

because of so many run-on<br />

or incomplete sentences.<br />

You have omitted many of<br />

the required elements of<br />

this assignment.<br />

MARGINAL CREDIT: QUITE A<br />

FEW CORRECTIONS<br />

NECESSARY WITH REVISIONS<br />

70 74 77<br />

You have quite a few<br />

grammatical, proof-reading,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or spelling errors. It is<br />

difficult to follow your<br />

thinking in some places<br />

because of run-on or<br />

incomplete sentences. Some<br />

required elements of this<br />

assignment are omitted.<br />

PARTIAL CREDIT: SOME<br />

CORRECTIONS NECESSARY<br />

WITH REVISIONS<br />

80 84 87<br />

You have some<br />

grammatical, proofreading,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or spelling<br />

errors. It is easy to follow<br />

your thinking in most<br />

places because there are<br />

few run-on or incomplete<br />

sentences. Most of the<br />

required elements of this<br />

assignment are included.<br />

FULL CREDIT: FEW OR NO<br />

CORRECTIONS NECESSARY<br />

WITH REVISIONS<br />

90 94 100<br />

You have a few or no<br />

grammatical, proofreading,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or spelling<br />

errors. Your writing<br />

flows very well <strong>and</strong> is<br />

easy to follow. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

assignment are included.<br />

It seems complete.<br />

PLAGIARISM. You need to credit <strong>and</strong> reference the relevant authors for all of their phrases or your paraphrases of the author’s ideas <strong>and</strong> language<br />

that you use as though they were your own; otherwise you are plagiarizing. Put the phrases in quotation marks, cite the page numbers where they can<br />

be found, or acknowledge the author as the source of the ideas <strong>and</strong> the page numbers where the author discusses the ideas you are borrowing,<br />

rephrasing, or paraphrasing.<br />

TOO MUCH<br />

PLAGIARIZING PRESENT:<br />

UNACCEPTABLE; PAPER<br />

RECEIVES A FAILING<br />

GRADE AS IS<br />

0<br />

A LOT OF PLAGIARIZING<br />

PRESENT: UNACCEPTABLE;<br />

MUST BE CORRECTED IN<br />

REVISIONS TO RECEIVE A<br />

PASSING GRADE<br />

50<br />

SOME PLAGIARIZING<br />

PRESENT: MUST BE<br />

CORRECTED IN<br />

REVISIONS TO RECEIVE<br />

A PASSING GRADE<br />

54<br />

A LITTLE PLAGIARIZING<br />

PRESENT: MUST BE<br />

CORRECTED IN<br />

REVISIONS TO RECEIVE<br />

A PASSING GRADE<br />

57<br />

NO PLAGIARIZING PRESENT;<br />

CREDIT FOR AND REFERENCES<br />

TO AUTHORS’ WORK IS<br />

ACCURATELY ACKNOWLEDGED<br />

AND REFERENCED<br />

NO LOSS OF CREDIT


LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE FEEDBACK AND EVALUATION<br />

PERSONAL INPUT. Your ideas, reflections, observations, concerns, <strong>and</strong> questions are useful, compelling, important, <strong>and</strong> discussed in a coherent<br />

<strong>and</strong> well-reasoned manner. All personal claims <strong>and</strong> opinions should be well-supported by relevant evidence <strong>and</strong> reasoning. All of your examples<br />

should be clearly explained <strong>and</strong> connected with relevant content.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION NO DIRECTION DIRECTION UNSURE RIGHT DIRECTION BULLSEYE<br />

I cannot make sense<br />

of your writing or<br />

reasoning. You<br />

discuss things<br />

primarily in terms of<br />

personal preferences<br />

(you agree or<br />

disagree with them,<br />

like or dislike them).<br />

Examples are omitted<br />

or are not explained<br />

<strong>and</strong> connected to<br />

relevant content.<br />

I cannot not make sense<br />

of much of your writing<br />

nor can I follow much of<br />

your reasoning. You<br />

discuss as facts most of<br />

your opinions without<br />

relevant evidence <strong>and</strong><br />

reasoning. Examples are<br />

omitted or many of them<br />

are not explained <strong>and</strong><br />

connected to relevant<br />

content.<br />

I cannot not make sense of<br />

some of your writing nor<br />

can I follow some of your<br />

reasoning. You discuss as<br />

facts some of your opinions<br />

without relevant evidence<br />

<strong>and</strong> reasoning while some<br />

evidence <strong>and</strong> reasoning are<br />

provided for others. Some<br />

examples are not explained<br />

<strong>and</strong> connected to relevant<br />

content <strong>and</strong> some are.<br />

Most of your writing<br />

<strong>and</strong> reasoning is<br />

coherent, sound, <strong>and</strong><br />

easy to follow. Most<br />

of your opinions are<br />

supported by relevant<br />

evidence with<br />

relevant reasoning<br />

explained. Most<br />

examples are<br />

explained <strong>and</strong><br />

connected to relevant<br />

content.<br />

All of your writing <strong>and</strong><br />

reasoning is coherent, sound,<br />

<strong>and</strong> easy to follow. Your<br />

claims <strong>and</strong> opinions are wellsupported<br />

by evidence,<br />

accurately represent the<br />

context from which they are<br />

taken with relevant reasoning<br />

clearly articulated <strong>and</strong><br />

explained. Examples are<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained <strong>and</strong> connected to<br />

relevant content.<br />

Q1 MOST SIGNIFICANT INSIGHT. What is the most significant insight you have acquired so far this term about your underst<strong>and</strong>ing of EITHER<br />

[a] what it means to be open-minded <strong>and</strong> what you would need to do to become more open-minded OR [b] what it means to be a better believer<br />

<strong>and</strong> what you would need to do to become a better believer OR [c] SOME COMBINATION OF BOTH [a] <strong>and</strong> [b] from your reading <strong>and</strong> our<br />

discussion of Newberg <strong>and</strong> Waldman’s book, Born to believe? If you have increased your underst<strong>and</strong>ing about something <strong>and</strong> acquired insight about<br />

it…you should be able to articulate <strong>and</strong> explain your enlightenment regarding the main idea <strong>and</strong> (1) its essential parts by themselves, (2) the important<br />

relationships between the parts, <strong>and</strong> (3) how your underst<strong>and</strong>ing from 1 <strong>and</strong> 2…helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment about your insight.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION NO DIRECTION DIRECTION UNSURE RIGHT DIRECTION BULLSEYE<br />

You do not convey<br />

an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

this assignment<br />

<strong>and</strong> its<br />

requirements. You<br />

have omitted all of<br />

the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

I cannot tell what<br />

your insight <strong>and</strong><br />

its important parts<br />

<strong>and</strong> relationships<br />

are. You have<br />

omitted many or<br />

all of the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

I have a sense of what you want to<br />

write about but your insight is not<br />

clear. Or, your insight is identified<br />

but not explained, developed or<br />

analyzed; its parts <strong>and</strong> important<br />

relationships are not specifically<br />

<strong>and</strong> clearly discussed. You may<br />

have too many insights to work<br />

with here. A few required elements<br />

of this question are omitted.<br />

Your insight, its parts,<br />

<strong>and</strong> important<br />

relationships are<br />

explained, developed, <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed to some degree.<br />

Some discussion of<br />

increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

is included. All required<br />

elements of this question<br />

are included.<br />

Your insight, its parts, <strong>and</strong><br />

important relationships are<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained <strong>and</strong> analyzed. How<br />

the analysis of your insight,<br />

its parts, <strong>and</strong> important<br />

relationships deepened <strong>and</strong><br />

broadened your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly explained .<br />

Q1B DISCUSSION OF INITIAL/PRIOR THINKING. What was your initial or prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the important ideas, terms, <strong>and</strong> definitions<br />

that you choose to analyze <strong>and</strong> why did you think these things? Explain what your prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing based on <strong>and</strong> where your thinking came from?<br />

WRONG DIRECTION NO DIRECTION DIRECTION UNSURE RIGHT DIRECTION BULLSEYE<br />

You do not discuss your<br />

initial or prior<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

relevant ideas or terms<br />

<strong>and</strong> what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based<br />

on. You have omitted all<br />

of the required elements<br />

of this question.<br />

Little discussion of your<br />

initial or prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of the relevant ideas or terms<br />

is included; little if any<br />

discussion of what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based on<br />

<strong>and</strong> where it came from. You<br />

have omitted many or all of<br />

the required elements of this<br />

question.<br />

Some discussion of your<br />

initial or prior<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

relevant ideas or terms<br />

<strong>and</strong> what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based<br />

on <strong>and</strong> where it came<br />

from is included. A few<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are omitted.<br />

Your initial or prior<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

relevant ideas or terms<br />

<strong>and</strong> what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based<br />

on <strong>and</strong> where it came<br />

from are explained to a<br />

considerable degree. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

Your initial or prior<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

relevant ideas or<br />

terms <strong>and</strong> what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was<br />

based on <strong>and</strong> where<br />

it came from are<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly<br />

explained.


Q1C ANALYSIS OF QUOTATION. Integrate into your essay a thorough analysis <strong>and</strong> explanation of how the most significant words, phrases,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or sentences from at least one quotation from our reading assignments helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment about your insight. (1)<br />

Clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely explain what the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases of the quote or definition mean to the author or source. (2) Then clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely<br />

explain how this meaning is relevant to the particular selected quote <strong>and</strong> your insight <strong>and</strong> how it helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment<br />

about the quotation <strong>and</strong> your insight.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION NO DIRECTION DIRECTION UNSURE RIGHT DIRECTION BULLSEYE<br />

You do not include<br />

a quote or do not<br />

use one for the<br />

assigned purposes.<br />

You do not convey<br />

an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors mentioned.<br />

You have omitted<br />

all of the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

I cannot tell what<br />

your main quote is.<br />

Content from quote<br />

is simply inserted or<br />

reworded without<br />

discussion. Much of<br />

your writing does<br />

not convey an<br />

accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors mentioned.<br />

You have omitted<br />

many or all of the<br />

required elements of<br />

this question.<br />

Your main quote is identified<br />

but not explained or<br />

analyzed. Content of quote is<br />

simply inserted, reworded, or<br />

summarized in oversimplified<br />

or overgeneralized<br />

comments. Its key words <strong>and</strong><br />

phrases are not specifically or<br />

clearly identified <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed. Some writing does<br />

not convey an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

mentioned. A few required<br />

elements of this question are<br />

omitted.<br />

The authors’ meaning of<br />

your main quote <strong>and</strong> its key<br />

words <strong>and</strong> phrases are<br />

defined, explained, <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed to some degree.<br />

Some discussion of how this<br />

meaning applies to the<br />

quote <strong>and</strong> your insights <strong>and</strong><br />

increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

included. Most of your<br />

writing conveys an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

cited <strong>and</strong> discussed. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

The authors’ meaning of your<br />

main quote <strong>and</strong> its key words<br />

<strong>and</strong> phrases are clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly explained <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed. How this meaning<br />

applies to the quote <strong>and</strong> your<br />

insights <strong>and</strong> how your<br />

increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

deepened <strong>and</strong> broadened is<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained. All of your<br />

writing conveys an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

cited <strong>and</strong> discussed.<br />

Q1D DEFINE AND ANALYZE CRITICAL TERM. Using relevant phrases <strong>and</strong> synonyms from at least one good dictionary <strong>and</strong> one good<br />

thesaurus, define <strong>and</strong> analyze thoroughly at least one word, term, or concept (<strong>and</strong> three other related useful words or concepts including one relevant<br />

synonym) from the quotation you have selected, <strong>and</strong> integrate what you learn about the definitions in your discussion. (1) Clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely explain<br />

what the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases of the quote or definition mean to the author or source (i.e., what the author or source is telling you are the specific<br />

ideas behind the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases). (2) Explain how the things you learn from the relevant content selected from one dictionary <strong>and</strong> one<br />

thesaurus about the words, terms, or concepts helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> enlightenment about the quotation <strong>and</strong> your<br />

insight.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION NO DIRECTION DIRECTION UNSURE RIGHT DIRECTION BULLSEYE<br />

You do not include<br />

any definitions of<br />

critical terms or<br />

key words. You<br />

have omitted all of<br />

the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

Some definitions of<br />

critical terms <strong>and</strong><br />

words are included.<br />

No explanation of<br />

what definitions<br />

mean or how they<br />

are relevant. You<br />

have omitted many<br />

or all of the<br />

required elements<br />

of this question.<br />

Definitions of critical terms<br />

<strong>and</strong> words are simply<br />

inserted or summarized in<br />

oversimplified or<br />

overgeneralized comments<br />

or included with some<br />

explanation of what the<br />

definitions mean <strong>and</strong> how<br />

they are relevant. A few<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are omitted.<br />

The meaning of the key words<br />

<strong>and</strong> phrases of a quote or<br />

definition as given by authors<br />

or sources are explained <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed to some degree.<br />

Some discussion of how this<br />

meaning applies to the quote<br />

<strong>and</strong> your insight <strong>and</strong> increased<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is included. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

The meaning of the key<br />

words <strong>and</strong> phrases of a quote<br />

or definition as given by<br />

authors or sources are clearly<br />

<strong>and</strong> thoroughly explained<br />

<strong>and</strong> analyzed. How this<br />

meaning applies to the quote<br />

<strong>and</strong> your insight <strong>and</strong> how<br />

your increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

deepened <strong>and</strong> broadened is<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained.


Q1E EXPLAIN SUPPORTIVE CONTENT FROM RELATED QUOTES. Integrate into your analysis a discussion of a minimum of four related<br />

phrases, sentences, <strong>and</strong>/or paragraphs from our reading assignments…that help you explain <strong>and</strong> support your insight <strong>and</strong> analysis. Explain how the<br />

things you learn from the relevant content of these supportive quotes are relevant to the analysis of your quotation <strong>and</strong> insight <strong>and</strong> how they helped<br />

broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment about your insight <strong>and</strong> the quotation.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION NO DIRECTION DIRECTION UNSURE RIGHT DIRECTION BULLSEYE<br />

You do not include<br />

quotes or do not<br />

use them for the<br />

assigned purposes.<br />

You do not convey<br />

an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors mentioned.<br />

You have omitted<br />

all of the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

I cannot tell what<br />

your supportive<br />

quotes are or what<br />

they support. Content<br />

from quotes is simply<br />

inserted or reworded<br />

without discussion.<br />

Much of your writing<br />

does not convey an<br />

accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors mentioned.<br />

You have omitted<br />

many or all of the<br />

required elements of<br />

this question.<br />

Your supportive quotes are<br />

identified but how they support<br />

your main quote <strong>and</strong> insights is<br />

not explained or analyzed.<br />

Content of quotes is simply<br />

inserted, reworded, or<br />

summarized in oversimplified or<br />

overgeneralized comments. The<br />

relevant content <strong>and</strong> relevance<br />

of the quotes are not specifically<br />

or clearly identified <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed. Some writing does<br />

not convey an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

mentioned. A few required<br />

elements of this question are<br />

omitted.<br />

How the content of the<br />

supportive quotes<br />

contributes to your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of your main<br />

quote <strong>and</strong> insights is<br />

explained <strong>and</strong> analyzed to<br />

some degree. Some<br />

discussion of how this<br />

content deepened <strong>and</strong><br />

broadened your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is included.<br />

Most of your writing<br />

conveys an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

cited <strong>and</strong> discussed. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

How the relevant content<br />

of the supportive quotes<br />

contributes to your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of your<br />

main quote <strong>and</strong> insights<br />

are clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly explained <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed. How this<br />

content deepened <strong>and</strong><br />

broadened your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is clearly<br />

<strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained. All of your<br />

writing conveys an<br />

accurate underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors cited <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed.<br />

Q2 THE DIFFERENCE INSIGHTS MAKE. So what? What difference does your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing make in your current thinking about the<br />

things you consider to be most relevant to your learning? In other words, How is your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing relevant to you <strong>and</strong> your life? Compare<br />

<strong>and</strong> contrast your prior thinking with your newly acquired <strong>and</strong> more enlightened thinking. What can you do with what you now know? How does<br />

it affect the way you perceive <strong>and</strong> think about things?<br />

WRONG DIRECTION NO DIRECTION DIRECTION UNSURE RIGHT DIRECTION BULLSEYE<br />

You do not discuss<br />

how your new<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

relevant to you <strong>and</strong><br />

things that you do<br />

<strong>and</strong> how it makes a<br />

difference in the<br />

way you perceive<br />

<strong>and</strong> think about<br />

important <strong>and</strong><br />

relevant things. You<br />

have omitted all of<br />

the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

You discuss little if<br />

anything about how<br />

your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

is relevant to you <strong>and</strong><br />

things that you do <strong>and</strong><br />

how it makes a<br />

difference in the way<br />

you perceive <strong>and</strong> think<br />

about important <strong>and</strong><br />

relevant things. You<br />

have omitted many or all<br />

of the required elements<br />

of this question.<br />

You discuss some<br />

things about how<br />

your new<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

relevant to you <strong>and</strong><br />

things that you do <strong>and</strong><br />

how it makes a<br />

difference in the way<br />

you perceive <strong>and</strong><br />

think about important<br />

<strong>and</strong> relevant things. A<br />

few required elements<br />

of this question are<br />

omitted.<br />

You include some<br />

comparison <strong>and</strong> contrast of<br />

your prior thinking with your<br />

newly acquired <strong>and</strong> more<br />

enlightened thinking. How<br />

your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

relevant to you <strong>and</strong> things<br />

that you do <strong>and</strong> how it makes<br />

a difference in the way you<br />

perceive <strong>and</strong> think about<br />

important <strong>and</strong> relevant things<br />

are explained to a<br />

considerable degree. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

You include a clear <strong>and</strong><br />

thorough comparison <strong>and</strong><br />

contrast of your prior thinking<br />

with your newly acquired <strong>and</strong><br />

more enlightened thinking.<br />

You clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explain how your new<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is relevant to<br />

you <strong>and</strong> things that you do.<br />

The difference your new<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing makes in the<br />

way you now perceive <strong>and</strong><br />

think about important <strong>and</strong><br />

relevant things is clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly explained.


FCS 3240 — LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE FEEDBACK: BASICS<br />

BASICS. You are attentive to correct grammar, punctuation, word-selection, sentence structure, spelling, referencing, proof-reading, etc., or your<br />

writing has problems in the following areas:<br />

F GRAMMAR F PUNCTUATION F WORDING F SENTENCE-STRUCTURE F SPELLING F MISQUOTING F REFERENCING F PROOF-READING<br />

You are attentive to necessary details <strong>and</strong> include all assigned components or you have omitted or not completed necessary details <strong>and</strong>/or assigned<br />

components. LEARNING ANALYSES turned-in that omit too many necessary details <strong>and</strong>/or assigned components are highly likely to be returned<br />

without credit until they are completed <strong>and</strong> resubmitted. These resubmitted assignments will be considered late.<br />

— submitted work is word-processed or typed F ALL PARTS ARE WP/T F SOME PARTS ARE WP/T F FEW OR NO PARTS ARE WP/T<br />

— put pages in order <strong>and</strong> include page numbering F PAGES OUT OF ORDER F PAGE NUMBERS OMITTED<br />

— include outline of insight, parts, important relationship(s) F STATED INSIGHT F PARTS F RELATIONSHIPS F NOT SURE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of four words F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of relevant definitions F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of relevant references F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate dictionary references in text F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of all relevant quotes F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate list of relevant references F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include accurate references in text F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— use one dictionary for each of four words defined/analyzed F NO DICTIONARY EVIDENT F SYNONYM LISTED/IDENTIFIED F NO SYNONYM<br />

(1 critical word; 3 related words including synonym) F DID SYNONYM F DID 3 WORDS F DID 2 WORDS F DID 1 WORD F ALL OMITTED<br />

— thoroughly analyze one quote F LISTED F IDENTIFIED – NOT LISTED F NOT IDENTIFIED QUOTE ANALYZED: F NOT SURE F OMITTED<br />

— include four quotes for support F DID 4 QUOTES F DID 3 QUOTES F DID 2 QUOTES F DID 1 QUOTE F NOT SURE F ALL OMITTED<br />

— include complete <strong>and</strong> accurate references for quotes <strong>and</strong> definitions in a reference page or bibliography<br />

F ALL ACCURATE F SOME ACCURATE F NONE ACCURATE F ALL OMITTED<br />

NO CREDIT:<br />

CORRECT AND<br />

RESUBMIT ASAP<br />

0 50 57<br />

You do not convey<br />

an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

this assignment<br />

<strong>and</strong> its<br />

requirements. You<br />

have omitted all of<br />

the required<br />

elements of this<br />

assignment.<br />

MINIMAL CREDIT: MANY<br />

CORRECTIONS NECESSARY<br />

WITH REVISIONS<br />

60 64 67<br />

You have far too many<br />

grammatical, proofreading,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or spelling<br />

errors. It is difficult to<br />

follow your thinking<br />

because of so many run-on<br />

or incomplete sentences.<br />

You have omitted many of<br />

the required elements of<br />

this assignment.<br />

MARGINAL CREDIT: QUITE A<br />

FEW CORRECTIONS<br />

NECESSARY WITH REVISIONS<br />

70 74 77<br />

You have quite a few<br />

grammatical, proof-reading,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or spelling errors. It is<br />

difficult to follow your<br />

thinking in some places<br />

because of run-on or<br />

incomplete sentences. Some<br />

required elements of this<br />

assignment are omitted.<br />

PARTIAL CREDIT: SOME<br />

CORRECTIONS NECESSARY<br />

WITH REVISIONS<br />

80 84 87<br />

You have some<br />

grammatical, proofreading,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or spelling<br />

errors. It is easy to follow<br />

your thinking in most<br />

places because there are<br />

few run-on or incomplete<br />

sentences. Most of the<br />

required elements of this<br />

assignment are included.<br />

FULL CREDIT: FEW OR NO<br />

CORRECTIONS NECESSARY<br />

WITH REVISIONS<br />

90 94 100<br />

You have a few or no<br />

grammatical, proofreading,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or spelling<br />

errors. Your writing<br />

flows very well <strong>and</strong> is<br />

easy to follow. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

assignment are included.<br />

It seems complete.<br />

PLAGIARISM. You need to credit <strong>and</strong> reference the relevant authors for all of their phrases or your paraphrases of the author’s ideas <strong>and</strong> language<br />

that you use as though they were your own; otherwise you are plagiarizing. Put the phrases in quotation marks, cite the page numbers where they can<br />

be found, or acknowledge the author as the source of the ideas <strong>and</strong> the page numbers where the author discusses the ideas you are borrowing,<br />

rephrasing, or paraphrasing.<br />

TOO MUCH<br />

PLAGIARIZING PRESENT:<br />

UNACCEPTABLE; PAPER<br />

RECEIVES A FAILING<br />

GRADE AS IS<br />

0<br />

A LOT OF PLAGIARIZING<br />

PRESENT: UNACCEPTABLE;<br />

MUST BE CORRECTED IN<br />

REVISIONS TO RECEIVE A<br />

PASSING GRADE<br />

50<br />

SOME PLAGIARIZING<br />

PRESENT: MUST BE<br />

CORRECTED IN<br />

REVISIONS TO RECEIVE<br />

A PASSING GRADE<br />

54<br />

A LITTLE PLAGIARIZING<br />

PRESENT: MUST BE<br />

CORRECTED IN<br />

REVISIONS TO RECEIVE<br />

A PASSING GRADE<br />

57<br />

NO PLAGIARIZING PRESENT;<br />

CREDIT FOR AND REFERENCES<br />

TO AUTHORS’ WORK IS<br />

ACCURATELY ACKNOWLEDGED<br />

AND REFERENCED<br />

NO LOSS OF CREDIT


LEARNING ANALYSIS ONE FEEDBACK AND EVALUATION<br />

PERSONAL INPUT. Your ideas, reflections, observations, concerns, <strong>and</strong> questions are useful, compelling, important, <strong>and</strong> discussed in a coherent<br />

<strong>and</strong> well-reasoned manner. All personal claims <strong>and</strong> opinions should be well-supported by relevant evidence <strong>and</strong> reasoning. All of your examples<br />

should be clearly explained <strong>and</strong> connected with relevant content.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

I cannot make sense<br />

of your writing or<br />

reasoning. You<br />

discuss things<br />

primarily in terms of<br />

personal preferences<br />

(you agree or<br />

disagree with them,<br />

like or dislike them).<br />

Examples are omitted<br />

or are not explained<br />

<strong>and</strong> connected to<br />

relevant content.<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

I cannot not make sense<br />

of much of your writing<br />

nor can I follow much of<br />

your reasoning. You<br />

discuss as facts most of<br />

your opinions without<br />

relevant evidence <strong>and</strong><br />

reasoning. Examples are<br />

omitted or many of them<br />

are not explained <strong>and</strong><br />

connected to relevant<br />

content.<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

I cannot not make sense of<br />

some of your writing nor<br />

can I follow some of your<br />

reasoning. You discuss as<br />

facts some of your opinions<br />

without relevant evidence<br />

<strong>and</strong> reasoning while some<br />

evidence <strong>and</strong> reasoning are<br />

provided for others. Some<br />

examples are not explained<br />

<strong>and</strong> connected to relevant<br />

content <strong>and</strong> some are.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

Most of your writing<br />

<strong>and</strong> reasoning is<br />

coherent, sound, <strong>and</strong><br />

easy to follow. Most<br />

of your opinions are<br />

supported by relevant<br />

evidence with<br />

relevant reasoning<br />

explained. Most<br />

examples are<br />

explained <strong>and</strong><br />

connected to relevant<br />

content.<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

All of your writing <strong>and</strong><br />

reasoning is coherent, sound,<br />

<strong>and</strong> easy to follow. Your<br />

claims <strong>and</strong> opinions are wellsupported<br />

by evidence,<br />

accurately represent the<br />

context from which they are<br />

taken with relevant reasoning<br />

clearly articulated <strong>and</strong><br />

explained. Examples are<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained <strong>and</strong> connected to<br />

relevant content.<br />

Q1 MOST SIGNIFICANT INSIGHT. What is the most significant insight you have acquired so far this term about your underst<strong>and</strong>ing of EITHER<br />

[a] what it means to be open-minded <strong>and</strong> what you would need to do to become more open-minded OR [b] what it means to be a better believer<br />

<strong>and</strong> what you would need to do to become a better believer OR [c] SOME COMBINATION OF BOTH [a] <strong>and</strong> [b] from your reading <strong>and</strong> our<br />

discussion of Newberg <strong>and</strong> Waldman’s book, Born to believe? If you have increased your underst<strong>and</strong>ing about something <strong>and</strong> acquired insight about<br />

it…you should be able to articulate <strong>and</strong> explain your enlightenment regarding the main idea <strong>and</strong> (1) its essential parts by themselves, (2) the important<br />

relationships between the parts, <strong>and</strong> (3) how your underst<strong>and</strong>ing from 1 <strong>and</strong> 2…helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment about your insight.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

You do not convey<br />

an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

this assignment<br />

<strong>and</strong> its<br />

requirements. You<br />

have omitted all of<br />

the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

I cannot tell what<br />

your insight <strong>and</strong><br />

its important parts<br />

<strong>and</strong> relationships<br />

are. You have<br />

omitted many or<br />

all of the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

I have a sense of what you want to<br />

write about but your insight is not<br />

clear. Or, your insight is identified<br />

but not explained, developed or<br />

analyzed; its parts <strong>and</strong> important<br />

relationships are not specifically<br />

<strong>and</strong> clearly discussed. You may<br />

have too many insights to work<br />

with here. A few required elements<br />

of this question are omitted.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

Your insight, its parts,<br />

<strong>and</strong> important<br />

relationships are<br />

explained, developed, <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed to some degree.<br />

Some discussion of<br />

increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

is included. All required<br />

elements of this question<br />

are included.<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

Your insight, its parts, <strong>and</strong><br />

important relationships are<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained <strong>and</strong> analyzed. How<br />

the analysis of your insight,<br />

its parts, <strong>and</strong> important<br />

relationships deepened <strong>and</strong><br />

broadened your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly explained .<br />

Q1B DISCUSSION OF INITIAL/PRIOR THINKING. What was your initial or prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the important ideas, terms, <strong>and</strong> definitions<br />

that you choose to analyze <strong>and</strong> why did you think these things? Explain what your prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing based on <strong>and</strong> where your thinking came from?<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

You do not discuss your<br />

initial or prior<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

relevant ideas or terms<br />

<strong>and</strong> what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based<br />

on. You have omitted all<br />

of the required elements<br />

of this question.<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

Little discussion of your<br />

initial or prior underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of the relevant ideas or terms<br />

is included; little if any<br />

discussion of what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based on<br />

<strong>and</strong> where it came from. You<br />

have omitted many or all of<br />

the required elements of this<br />

question.<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

Some discussion of your<br />

initial or prior<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

relevant ideas or terms<br />

<strong>and</strong> what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based<br />

on <strong>and</strong> where it came<br />

from is included. A few<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are omitted.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

Your initial or prior<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

relevant ideas or terms<br />

<strong>and</strong> what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was based<br />

on <strong>and</strong> where it came<br />

from are explained to a<br />

considerable degree. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

Your initial or prior<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

relevant ideas or<br />

terms <strong>and</strong> what your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing was<br />

based on <strong>and</strong> where<br />

it came from are<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly<br />

explained.


Q1C ANALYSIS OF QUOTATION. Integrate into your essay a thorough analysis <strong>and</strong> explanation of how the most significant words, phrases,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or sentences from at least one quotation from our reading assignments helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment about your insight. (1)<br />

Clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely explain what the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases of the quote or definition mean to the author or source. (2) Then clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely<br />

explain how this meaning is relevant to the particular selected quote <strong>and</strong> your insight <strong>and</strong> how it helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment<br />

about the quotation <strong>and</strong> your insight.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

You do not include<br />

a quote or do not<br />

use one for the<br />

assigned purposes.<br />

You do not convey<br />

an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors mentioned.<br />

You have omitted<br />

all of the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

I cannot tell what<br />

your main quote is.<br />

Content from quote<br />

is simply inserted or<br />

reworded without<br />

discussion. Much of<br />

your writing does<br />

not convey an<br />

accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors mentioned.<br />

You have omitted<br />

many or all of the<br />

required elements of<br />

this question.<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

Your main quote is identified<br />

but not explained or<br />

analyzed. Content of quote is<br />

simply inserted, reworded, or<br />

summarized in oversimplified<br />

or overgeneralized<br />

comments. Its key words <strong>and</strong><br />

phrases are not specifically or<br />

clearly identified <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed. Some writing does<br />

not convey an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

mentioned. A few required<br />

elements of this question are<br />

omitted.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

The authors’ meaning of<br />

your main quote <strong>and</strong> its key<br />

words <strong>and</strong> phrases are<br />

defined, explained, <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed to some degree.<br />

Some discussion of how this<br />

meaning applies to the<br />

quote <strong>and</strong> your insights <strong>and</strong><br />

increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

included. Most of your<br />

writing conveys an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

cited <strong>and</strong> discussed. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

The authors’ meaning of your<br />

main quote <strong>and</strong> its key words<br />

<strong>and</strong> phrases are clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly explained <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed. How this meaning<br />

applies to the quote <strong>and</strong> your<br />

insights <strong>and</strong> how your<br />

increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

deepened <strong>and</strong> broadened is<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained. All of your<br />

writing conveys an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

cited <strong>and</strong> discussed.<br />

Q1D DEFINE AND ANALYZE CRITICAL TERM. Using relevant phrases <strong>and</strong> synonyms from at least one good dictionary <strong>and</strong> one good<br />

thesaurus, define <strong>and</strong> analyze thoroughly at least one word, term, or concept (<strong>and</strong> three other related useful words or concepts including one relevant<br />

synonym) from the quotation you have selected, <strong>and</strong> integrate what you learn about the definitions in your discussion. (1) Clearly <strong>and</strong> precisely explain<br />

what the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases of the quote or definition mean to the author or source (i.e., what the author or source is telling you are the specific<br />

ideas behind the key words <strong>and</strong> phrases). (2) Explain how the things you learn from the relevant content selected from one dictionary <strong>and</strong> one<br />

thesaurus about the words, terms, or concepts helped broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> enlightenment about the quotation <strong>and</strong> your<br />

insight.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

You do not include<br />

any definitions of<br />

critical terms or<br />

key words. You<br />

have omitted all of<br />

the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

Some definitions of<br />

critical terms <strong>and</strong><br />

words are included.<br />

No explanation of<br />

what definitions<br />

mean or how they<br />

are relevant. You<br />

have omitted many<br />

or all of the<br />

required elements<br />

of this question.<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

Definitions of critical terms<br />

<strong>and</strong> words are simply<br />

inserted or summarized in<br />

oversimplified or<br />

overgeneralized comments<br />

or included with some<br />

explanation of what the<br />

definitions mean <strong>and</strong> how<br />

they are relevant. A few<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are omitted.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

The meaning of the key words<br />

<strong>and</strong> phrases of a quote or<br />

definition as given by authors<br />

or sources are explained <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed to some degree.<br />

Some discussion of how this<br />

meaning applies to the quote<br />

<strong>and</strong> your insight <strong>and</strong> increased<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is included. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

The meaning of the key<br />

words <strong>and</strong> phrases of a quote<br />

or definition as given by<br />

authors or sources are clearly<br />

<strong>and</strong> thoroughly explained<br />

<strong>and</strong> analyzed. How this<br />

meaning applies to the quote<br />

<strong>and</strong> your insight <strong>and</strong> how<br />

your increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

deepened <strong>and</strong> broadened is<br />

clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained.


Q1E EXPLAIN SUPPORTIVE CONTENT FROM RELATED QUOTES. Integrate into your analysis a discussion of a minimum of four related<br />

phrases, sentences, <strong>and</strong>/or paragraphs from our reading assignments…that help you explain <strong>and</strong> support your insight <strong>and</strong> analysis. Explain how the<br />

things you learn from the relevant content of these supportive quotes are relevant to the analysis of your quotation <strong>and</strong> insight <strong>and</strong> how they helped<br />

broaden <strong>and</strong> deepen your enlightenment about your insight <strong>and</strong> the quotation.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

You do not include<br />

quotes or do not<br />

use them for the<br />

assigned purposes.<br />

You do not convey<br />

an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors mentioned.<br />

You have omitted<br />

all of the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

I cannot tell what<br />

your supportive<br />

quotes are or what<br />

they support. Content<br />

from quotes is simply<br />

inserted or reworded<br />

without discussion.<br />

Much of your writing<br />

does not convey an<br />

accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors mentioned.<br />

You have omitted<br />

many or all of the<br />

required elements of<br />

this question.<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

Your supportive quotes are<br />

identified but how they support<br />

your main quote <strong>and</strong> insights is<br />

not explained or analyzed.<br />

Content of quotes is simply<br />

inserted, reworded, or<br />

summarized in oversimplified or<br />

overgeneralized comments. The<br />

relevant content <strong>and</strong> relevance<br />

of the quotes are not specifically<br />

or clearly identified <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed. Some writing does<br />

not convey an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

mentioned. A few required<br />

elements of this question are<br />

omitted.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

How the content of the<br />

supportive quotes<br />

contributes to your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of your main<br />

quote <strong>and</strong> insights is<br />

explained <strong>and</strong> analyzed to<br />

some degree. Some<br />

discussion of how this<br />

content deepened <strong>and</strong><br />

broadened your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is included.<br />

Most of your writing<br />

conveys an accurate<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of authors<br />

cited <strong>and</strong> discussed. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

How the relevant content<br />

of the supportive quotes<br />

contributes to your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of your<br />

main quote <strong>and</strong> insights<br />

are clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly explained <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzed. How this<br />

content deepened <strong>and</strong><br />

broadened your<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is clearly<br />

<strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explained. All of your<br />

writing conveys an<br />

accurate underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

authors cited <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed.<br />

Q2 THE DIFFERENCE INSIGHTS MAKE. So what? What difference does your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing make in your current thinking about the<br />

things you consider to be most relevant to your learning? In other words, How is your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing relevant to you <strong>and</strong> your life? Compare<br />

<strong>and</strong> contrast your prior thinking with your newly acquired <strong>and</strong> more enlightened thinking. What can you do with what you now know? How does<br />

it affect the way you perceive <strong>and</strong> think about things?<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

You do not discuss<br />

how your new<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

relevant to you <strong>and</strong><br />

things that you do<br />

<strong>and</strong> how it makes a<br />

difference in the<br />

way you perceive<br />

<strong>and</strong> think about<br />

important <strong>and</strong><br />

relevant things. You<br />

have omitted all of<br />

the required<br />

elements of this<br />

question.<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

You discuss little if<br />

anything about how<br />

your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

is relevant to you <strong>and</strong><br />

things that you do <strong>and</strong><br />

how it makes a<br />

difference in the way<br />

you perceive <strong>and</strong> think<br />

about important <strong>and</strong><br />

relevant things. You<br />

have omitted many or all<br />

of the required elements<br />

of this question.<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

You discuss some<br />

things about how<br />

your new<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

relevant to you <strong>and</strong><br />

things that you do <strong>and</strong><br />

how it makes a<br />

difference in the way<br />

you perceive <strong>and</strong><br />

think about important<br />

<strong>and</strong> relevant things. A<br />

few required elements<br />

of this question are<br />

omitted.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

You include some<br />

comparison <strong>and</strong> contrast of<br />

your prior thinking with your<br />

newly acquired <strong>and</strong> more<br />

enlightened thinking. How<br />

your new underst<strong>and</strong>ing is<br />

relevant to you <strong>and</strong> things<br />

that you do <strong>and</strong> how it makes<br />

a difference in the way you<br />

perceive <strong>and</strong> think about<br />

important <strong>and</strong> relevant things<br />

are explained to a<br />

considerable degree. All<br />

required elements of this<br />

question are included.<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

You include a clear <strong>and</strong><br />

thorough comparison <strong>and</strong><br />

contrast of your prior thinking<br />

with your newly acquired <strong>and</strong><br />

more enlightened thinking.<br />

You clearly <strong>and</strong> thoroughly<br />

explain how your new<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is relevant to<br />

you <strong>and</strong> things that you do.<br />

The difference your new<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing makes in the<br />

way you now perceive <strong>and</strong><br />

think about important <strong>and</strong><br />

relevant things is clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly explained.


REVISION BASICS AND QUALITY. How effectively did you respond to previous feedback? Did you provide ample evidence of rethinking the<br />

assigned questions, your responses to them, <strong>and</strong> your insight in terms of how they are addressed, explained, analyzed? Does your new content add<br />

depth, breadth, detail, clarity, precision or is it more information at the same level? Is your increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> learning directly identified,<br />

explained, <strong>and</strong> thoroughly analyzed?<br />

— include BASICS of revisions F RETURNED PREVIOUS FEEDBACK/GRADING SHEETS F OMITTED<br />

F RETURNED PREVIOUS LEARNING ANALYSIS F OMITTED<br />

F HIGHLIGHTED NEW CONTENT F OMITTED<br />

F REVISED INSIGHT, PARTS, RELATIONSHIPS F SOME COMPONENTS REVISED F SOME COMPONENTS INACCURATE F NONE NEEDED F OMITTED<br />

F REVISED LIST OF WORDS F SOME WORDS REVISED F SOME WORDS INACCURATE F NONE NEEDED F OMITTED<br />

F REVISED LIST OF DEFINITIONS F SOME DEFINITIONS REVISED F SOME DEFINITIONS INACCURATE F NONE NEEDED F OMITTED<br />

F REVISED LIST OF DEFINITION REFERENCES F SOME REFERENCES REVISED F SOME REFERENCES INACCURATE F NONE NEEDED F OMITTED<br />

F REVISED LIST OF QUOTES F SOME QUOTES REVISED F SOME QUOTES INACCURATE F NONE NEEDED F OMITTED<br />

F REVISED LIST OF QUOTE REFERENCES F SOME REFERENCES REVISED F SOME REFERENCES INACCURATE F NONE NEEDED F OMITTED<br />

F REVISED REFERENCES IN TEXT F SOME REFERENCES REVISED F SOME REFERENCES INACCURATE F NONE NEEDED F OMITTED<br />

F REVISED REFERENCE PAGE F SOME REFERENCES REVISED F SOME REFERENCES INACCURATE F NONE NEEDED F OMITTED<br />

WRONG DIRECTION<br />

0 50 57<br />

There is no<br />

evidence of<br />

changes in your<br />

most recent version<br />

of the LA other<br />

than cosmetic,<br />

basic corrections.<br />

Few if any<br />

previously omitted<br />

components have<br />

been added. BASICS<br />

of revisions not<br />

included.<br />

WRONG DIRECTION = E<br />

0 50 57<br />

NO DIRECTION<br />

60 64 67<br />

There is no evidence<br />

of rethinking<br />

questions, responses,<br />

quotes <strong>and</strong> insight in<br />

how they are<br />

addressed, explained,<br />

analyzed in new<br />

content. Many<br />

corrections ignored.<br />

Most changes are<br />

cosmetic, basic<br />

corrections. Few<br />

previously omitted<br />

components have<br />

been added. BASICS<br />

of revisions not<br />

included.<br />

NO DIRECTION = D<br />

60 64 67<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE<br />

70 74 77<br />

There is some evidence of<br />

rethinking questions,<br />

responses, quotes <strong>and</strong> insight<br />

in how they are addressed,<br />

explained, analyzed in new<br />

content. Some corrections<br />

ignored. Many changes are<br />

cosmetic <strong>and</strong> basic<br />

corrections. Some previously<br />

omitted components have<br />

been added. Added<br />

information stays on the same<br />

level as before. No increased<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> learning is<br />

evident. BASICS of revisions<br />

may or may not have been<br />

included.<br />

OVERALL GRADE<br />

DIRECTION UNSURE = C<br />

70 74 77<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION<br />

80 84 87<br />

There is considerable<br />

evidence of rethinking<br />

questions, responses,<br />

quotes <strong>and</strong> insight in how<br />

they are addressed,<br />

explained, analyzed in new<br />

content. Necessary<br />

corrections have been made<br />

<strong>and</strong> previously omitted<br />

components have been<br />

added. Much of new<br />

content adds depth,<br />

breadth, detail, clarity,<br />

precision. Increased<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> learning<br />

is identified, discussed, <strong>and</strong><br />

explained. BASICS of<br />

revisions included.<br />

RIGHT DIRECTION = B<br />

80 84 87<br />

BULLSEYE<br />

90 94 100<br />

There is a lot of evidence of<br />

rethinking questions,<br />

responses, quotes <strong>and</strong> insight<br />

in how they are addressed,<br />

explained, analyzed in new<br />

content. Necessary<br />

corrections have been made<br />

<strong>and</strong> previously omitted<br />

components have been<br />

added. New content adds<br />

much more depth, breadth,<br />

detail, clarity, precision.<br />

Increased underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong><br />

learning is clearly <strong>and</strong><br />

thoroughly identified,<br />

discussed, <strong>and</strong> explained.<br />

BASICS of revisions included.<br />

BULLSEYE = A<br />

90 94 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!