26.07.2013 Views

HangarRash_November 2009.wps - Society of Antique Modelers

HangarRash_November 2009.wps - Society of Antique Modelers

HangarRash_November 2009.wps - Society of Antique Modelers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On the subject <strong>of</strong> scale modeling, I have a proposal to make to the club. About four years ago I registered with FAC to<br />

form Squadron 70-The Scale Masters. We started <strong>of</strong>f with a small group flying at Fairview Park in Costa Mesa (dog<br />

park) and had some minor successes with conducting monthly contests for about one year <strong>of</strong> activity. At the end <strong>of</strong> this<br />

period several active flyers dropped out- Bill Taylor when he had his stroke and Norm Jacky, John Anderson and a few<br />

others who faded away for various reasons and the organized activity stopped. However, the squadron number is still<br />

listed as active, and my proposal is to make the Scale Masters a sub group to the SCAMPS, much as the Scale Staffel is a<br />

sub group to the Orbiteers. My thoughts are we could add one <strong>of</strong> the FAC scale events to the monthly club contest<br />

agenda, and also get guys used to scale judging in addition to building and flying scale. That was one <strong>of</strong> the things we<br />

were all hesitant about in the dog park contests, and did not encourage building to a higher standard as far as FAC scale<br />

rules were concerned or even exploring the rules very much. This would also fill a hole between the FAC 69 group in<br />

Balboa Park (Grassy Knoll) and the San Diego bunch. We had one contest at Perris in the late spring hosted by the FAC<br />

69, but we could hold dual or tri-club scale events if we wanted. It would all build toward effective hosting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

WESTFAC IV when it returns to Perris. Think about it-it doesn’t cost a dime and I would be happy to champion the<br />

organization for the club. Send me your thoughts at the email address noted at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this column.<br />

Gumbander Info<br />

John Donnelson has gotten hold <strong>of</strong> some early summer Tan Super Sport rubber and done some testing on it. The word is<br />

that the May and June batches <strong>of</strong> Tan Super Sport have the best properties ever seen for this material. What follows is<br />

John’s email to me concerning this.<br />

“I got a call from Don DeLoach a while back telling me that the new Tan Super Sport rubber is the best yet, and that if I<br />

wanted some I had better order it before John Clapp (FAI) ran out. Its only available in 1/8 and 1/16. John said that it was<br />

significantly better than last year's rubber (I have a lot <strong>of</strong> Sept 08) so I decided to run a comparative test. The new rubber<br />

is dated June 09.<br />

Since I have several models powered with Gizmo Geezer 9.5 inch front ends and have been using 36 in motors I decided<br />

to do a back-to-back comparative test. I built two 8 strand x 1/8 x36 in motors and tested them to near destruction. They<br />

were wound 5 times to near breaking torque, the Sept 08 only 4 because it broke on the 4th wind. Each was allowed a<br />

short rest in between. The winder was a Gizmo, so the results are only as good as the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the Gizmo torque<br />

meter. I didn't measure it, but Don said that the 09 rubber is slightly thicker that the older rubber, so one would expect<br />

that it would have higher torque just due to the cross section.<br />

In general, (I can provide data if desired), on the first wind it was 15% higher in torque, the second wind 20%, the third<br />

wind 25% and the forth wind 30%. And, it was pretty even across the envelope. What make this especially impressive, is<br />

that its exactly the characteristic that we need for the FAC mass launches, since you aren't allowed to change the motor<br />

between rounds.<br />

When I get some time I will take a new motor to break torque to see how far I can go and determine the rubber constant.<br />

Don said that he normally winds a 16 strand (1/8in) motor to 40 in-oz and is now winding his Gollywock to 45 in-oz and<br />

hasn't broken a motor yet. I would like to get some data for some good Tan ll to see how this new rubber compares.<br />

Also, I have calibrated my Andriukov winder using Fernando's Morrill winder. I probably need to do the same with my<br />

Gizmo winder. Knowing John, he probably did a good job <strong>of</strong> designing his torque meter to be accurate.”<br />

I’ve been flying with May and June 09 rubber and it is noticeably better-takes the torque and is significantly more<br />

durable. I was happy to get three full power runs on any <strong>of</strong> my large rubber jobs before the motor would break down.<br />

I’ve been getting up to six flights without damage to the motors, flying to my normal torque levels. Now I don’t know if I<br />

should save them or toss them! Of course I just hang onto the good ones as initial test motors for the next event, but all<br />

the same it’s nice to get a little more for your money. Hopefully they have the process dialed in and can repeat this more<br />

than once or twice a season!<br />

News Flash-The SCAMPS board has endorsed Larry Tougas for Vice President <strong>of</strong> District 10 in the upcoming AMA<br />

election. Larry appears to be a go-getter type guy; very interested in all aspects <strong>of</strong> aero modeling and interested in<br />

promoting flying site retention as a priority. He has also moved the VP job into the modern world by establishing a<br />

website where we can all go and communicate with other modelers, clubs etc. within District 10 and beyond. To me<br />

anyway this is a significant step to take by him and a great tool for the future.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!