HangarRash_November 2009.wps - Society of Antique Modelers
HangarRash_November 2009.wps - Society of Antique Modelers
HangarRash_November 2009.wps - Society of Antique Modelers
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
On the subject <strong>of</strong> scale modeling, I have a proposal to make to the club. About four years ago I registered with FAC to<br />
form Squadron 70-The Scale Masters. We started <strong>of</strong>f with a small group flying at Fairview Park in Costa Mesa (dog<br />
park) and had some minor successes with conducting monthly contests for about one year <strong>of</strong> activity. At the end <strong>of</strong> this<br />
period several active flyers dropped out- Bill Taylor when he had his stroke and Norm Jacky, John Anderson and a few<br />
others who faded away for various reasons and the organized activity stopped. However, the squadron number is still<br />
listed as active, and my proposal is to make the Scale Masters a sub group to the SCAMPS, much as the Scale Staffel is a<br />
sub group to the Orbiteers. My thoughts are we could add one <strong>of</strong> the FAC scale events to the monthly club contest<br />
agenda, and also get guys used to scale judging in addition to building and flying scale. That was one <strong>of</strong> the things we<br />
were all hesitant about in the dog park contests, and did not encourage building to a higher standard as far as FAC scale<br />
rules were concerned or even exploring the rules very much. This would also fill a hole between the FAC 69 group in<br />
Balboa Park (Grassy Knoll) and the San Diego bunch. We had one contest at Perris in the late spring hosted by the FAC<br />
69, but we could hold dual or tri-club scale events if we wanted. It would all build toward effective hosting <strong>of</strong> the<br />
WESTFAC IV when it returns to Perris. Think about it-it doesn’t cost a dime and I would be happy to champion the<br />
organization for the club. Send me your thoughts at the email address noted at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this column.<br />
Gumbander Info<br />
John Donnelson has gotten hold <strong>of</strong> some early summer Tan Super Sport rubber and done some testing on it. The word is<br />
that the May and June batches <strong>of</strong> Tan Super Sport have the best properties ever seen for this material. What follows is<br />
John’s email to me concerning this.<br />
“I got a call from Don DeLoach a while back telling me that the new Tan Super Sport rubber is the best yet, and that if I<br />
wanted some I had better order it before John Clapp (FAI) ran out. Its only available in 1/8 and 1/16. John said that it was<br />
significantly better than last year's rubber (I have a lot <strong>of</strong> Sept 08) so I decided to run a comparative test. The new rubber<br />
is dated June 09.<br />
Since I have several models powered with Gizmo Geezer 9.5 inch front ends and have been using 36 in motors I decided<br />
to do a back-to-back comparative test. I built two 8 strand x 1/8 x36 in motors and tested them to near destruction. They<br />
were wound 5 times to near breaking torque, the Sept 08 only 4 because it broke on the 4th wind. Each was allowed a<br />
short rest in between. The winder was a Gizmo, so the results are only as good as the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the Gizmo torque<br />
meter. I didn't measure it, but Don said that the 09 rubber is slightly thicker that the older rubber, so one would expect<br />
that it would have higher torque just due to the cross section.<br />
In general, (I can provide data if desired), on the first wind it was 15% higher in torque, the second wind 20%, the third<br />
wind 25% and the forth wind 30%. And, it was pretty even across the envelope. What make this especially impressive, is<br />
that its exactly the characteristic that we need for the FAC mass launches, since you aren't allowed to change the motor<br />
between rounds.<br />
When I get some time I will take a new motor to break torque to see how far I can go and determine the rubber constant.<br />
Don said that he normally winds a 16 strand (1/8in) motor to 40 in-oz and is now winding his Gollywock to 45 in-oz and<br />
hasn't broken a motor yet. I would like to get some data for some good Tan ll to see how this new rubber compares.<br />
Also, I have calibrated my Andriukov winder using Fernando's Morrill winder. I probably need to do the same with my<br />
Gizmo winder. Knowing John, he probably did a good job <strong>of</strong> designing his torque meter to be accurate.”<br />
I’ve been flying with May and June 09 rubber and it is noticeably better-takes the torque and is significantly more<br />
durable. I was happy to get three full power runs on any <strong>of</strong> my large rubber jobs before the motor would break down.<br />
I’ve been getting up to six flights without damage to the motors, flying to my normal torque levels. Now I don’t know if I<br />
should save them or toss them! Of course I just hang onto the good ones as initial test motors for the next event, but all<br />
the same it’s nice to get a little more for your money. Hopefully they have the process dialed in and can repeat this more<br />
than once or twice a season!<br />
News Flash-The SCAMPS board has endorsed Larry Tougas for Vice President <strong>of</strong> District 10 in the upcoming AMA<br />
election. Larry appears to be a go-getter type guy; very interested in all aspects <strong>of</strong> aero modeling and interested in<br />
promoting flying site retention as a priority. He has also moved the VP job into the modern world by establishing a<br />
website where we can all go and communicate with other modelers, clubs etc. within District 10 and beyond. To me<br />
anyway this is a significant step to take by him and a great tool for the future.