(~~~~~) mffi ~l - Ministry of Women and Child Development

~,~.".~:.; :>-:C~ 

REVA NAYYAR 

SECRETARY 

Tel. : 23383586, Telefax : 23381495 

E-mail: secy.wcd@sb.nic.in 

Tol 

(i. 0 

Dear' - 

D.O.No.1-4/2005-NPAG 

~~ 

~ ~~I~" ~ ..j-;jIc1

To 

No. 13-4/2005-CD-1 

Government of India 

Ministry of Human Resource Development 

Department of Women & Child Development 

Secretary in-charge of ICDS Scheme 

in all the States/UTs 

MOST IMMEDIATE 

Shastri Shawan, New Delhi 

Dated 18.11.2005 

Subject: Meeting with State Secretaries in-charge of ICDS to be 

held on 1" December 2005 at NIPCCD, New Delhi to 

review ICDS Scheme. 

Sir/Madam, 

I am directed to refer to D.O. letter of even number dated 

16.11.2005 from Shri Chaman Kumar, Joint Secretary, on the subject 

mentioned above and to send herewith the Agenda for the meeting of 

the State Secretaries in-charge of ICDS to be held on 1" December 

2005 at NIPCCD, New Delhi for necessary action. 

2. The Agenda is also available on this Department's website 

www.wcd.nic.in . 

Utj fY """"~"(t 6d-~ {, 

~111-~ ~.q 

Yours faithfully, 

~i) 

Deputy Secretary to the Government of India 

23385416 

lJ,...cS, ~, J1 M

AGENDA FOR THE MEETING WITH STATE SECRETARIES IN- 

CHARGE OF ICDS SCHEME TO BE HELD ON 1 st DECEMBER 

2005 AT NIPCCD, NEW DELHI 

ITEM I. Expansion of ICDS and operationalisation of new 

ICDS Projects and Anganwadi Centres 

1. Expansion of ICDS Scheme: Administrative orders sanctioning 

additional Projects and Anganwadi Centres have been issued to all the 

States/UTs. State-wise number of additional Projecst/AWCs sanctioned is at 

Annexure-I. 

1.1 Action Plan for operationalisation of new ICDS Projects & AWCs:- 

Gantt Chart and PERT Chart indicating list of activities required to operationalise 

new ICDS Projects and AWCs within a period of one year have been sent to all 

States. States were requested to plan these activities in advance as per the 

GANTT Chart and PERT Chart so that all the new ICDS Projects and AWCs 

sanctioned can be made operational within one year. A copy each of Gantt Chart 

and PERT Chart is at Annexure II. 

1.2 States/UTs are requested to indicate the stages at which they have 

reached as per the PERT Chart. 

ITEM II. Supplementary Nutrition: 

1.1 For the year 2005-06, the Government of India has released funds to the 

extent of 50% of its share for supplementary nutrition. State-wise details of funds 

released is at Annexure III. 

1.2 It has been observed that States/UTs have not been making adequate 

budgetary provision in their Budget for supplementary nutrition. The expenditure 

is also not as per financial norms. 

1.3 States/UTs are requested to bring along information on 

(i) budget allocation for supplementary nutrition for 2005-06; 

(ii) expenditure on supplementary nutrition upto 

30.09.2005/31.10.2005, and 

(iii) SOE and Unspent balance under ICDS (General) for the second 

quarter ending 30.09.2005 out of funds released in 2005-06. 

1.4 One of the objectives of the ICDS Scheme is to reduce malnutrition level 

among children. However, the analysis of data received from States/UTs in the 

last four years reveal that there has been only a marginal decrease in the 

percentage of undernourished children.

1.4.1 States/UTs have been requested to take up certain measures vide this 

Department’s D.O. letter No. 16-10/2005-ME dated 17.10.2005 (Annexure IV). 

States/UTs are requested to indicate the measures taken by them in this 

regard. 

1.5 Supplementary nutrition has to be provided for 300 days in a year as per 

norms of the Scheme and Supreme Court’s direction. 

1.5.1 The States which are not providing supplementary nutrition as per the 

norms of the Scheme may indicate reasons/constraints. 

ITEM III. Medicine Kits, PSE Kits and IEC: 

1.1 Medicine kits, Pre-school kits and IEC material are very crucial for 

improving the impact of the Scheme. These kits must be procured on regular 

basis. 

1.2 States/UTs are requested to bring along information on Medicine kits, PSE 

kits and IEC material in the following proforma:- 

Year No. of 

operational 

AWCs 

As on 

31.03.2003 

As on 

31.03.2004 

As on 

31.03.2005 

As on 

30.09.2005 

PSE kits 

No. of 

PSE kits 

procurred 

Exp. 

incurred 

ITEM IV. KISHORI SHAKTI YOJANA 

Medicine kits IEC 

No. of 

medicine 

kits 

procurred 

Exp. 

incurred 

Expenditure 

incurred on 

IEC activities 

1.1. Kishori Shakti Yojana has been extended to cover all ICDS projects. 

Administrative sanctions to this effect have been issued to the State 

Governments/ UT Administrations.

1.2. Under KSY, various programmatic options are available to the States /UTs 

to selectively intervene for the development of the adolescent girls, based on 

area specific needs. 

1.3. As per para 12 of the guidelines of KSY, States/UTs have to prepare an 

Action Plan for the implementation of KSY and share the same with this 

Department . States have to ensure that the Action Plan on Kishori Shakti 

Yojana for 2005-06 is sent to DWCD, if not sent earlier. 

1.4. States have to ensure that SOE of the year 2004-05 and the Action Plan 

for 2005-06 is furnished so as to consider release of funds for the blocks 

sanctioned for implementation of scheme in 2005-06. 

1.5. States/UTs are requested to bring along information on:- 

i. status of implementation of the scheme for the blocks sanctioned 

during 2005-06 alongwith old blocks; 

ii. Statement of Expenditure (SOE), in the format (under KSY) 

circulated vide this Departments letter No. 9-16/2005-KSY dated 

18.8.2005 (Annexure-V). 

iii. Action Plan for implementation of KSY in 2005-06 

1.6. States are requested to ensure timely submission of monitoring reports in 

prescribed format (Annexure-VI & VII). 

ITEM V. NUTRITION PROGRAMME FOR ADOLESCENT GIRLS 

1.1 Government of India has approved the implementation of this scheme in 

the year 2005-06, on a pilot basis, through the Department of Women and Child 

Development, Ministry of Human Resource Development. The scheme has to be 

implemented as per the guidelines issued by the Planning Commission earlier, 

with the following two major modifications:- 

i. The scheme has to be restricted only to adolescent girls, as 

pregnant women and lactating mothers are covered under ICDS. 

ii. The list of the beneficiaries has to be approved in the Gram Sabha. 

1.2. The revised guidelines along with formats of the registers prescribed, and 

the periodical reports to be sent have been circulated to States vide this 

Department’s letter No. 1-23/2005-NPAG dated 14.7.2005. 

1.3. First instalment of ACA on a 100% grant basis to the States has already 

been released to States by Ministry of Finance vide order no. F.No. 44(9) PF 

I/2005-25 dated 26 th July, 2005 and the Ministry of Food and Public Distribution 

has allotted foodgrains for 2005-06.

1.4. D/WCD has been receiving requests from States for revalidation of funds 

released in 2002-03 & 2003-04 & food grains allocated in these years. In order to 

arrive at the correct figures of unspent funds and unutilized food-grains, the State 

governments have been requested to furnish information in the format. The 

information is awaited from all the States. 

1.5. States/UTs are requested to bring along information on:- 

i. status of implementation of the scheme during 2005-06; 

ii. State-wise status of financial progress - the amount utilized and 

unspent balance available with them; and 

iii. food grains lifted during 2002-03 & 2003-04 under NPAG as per 

statement enclosed (Annexure-VIII). 

1.6 States are requested to ensure timely submission of monitoring reports in 

the prescribed format.

Annexure - I 

Statewise number of additional ICDS Projects and AWCs sanctioned 

Sl. 

No. 

(1) 

Name of the 

State 

Number of ICDS Projects and Anganwadi Centres 

Projects 

Anganwadi Centres 

Addl. 

AWCs in 

New ICDS 

Projects 

Addl. 

AWCs in 

Existing 

ICDS Projects 

(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 

1 Andhra Pradesh 

2 Arunachal Pradesh 

3 Assam 

4 Bihar 

5 Jharkhand 

6 Goa 

7 Gujarat 

8 Haryana 

9 Himachal Pradesh 

10 Jammu & Kashmir 

11 Karnataka 

12 Kerala 

13 Madhya Pradesh 

14 Chhatishgarh 

15 Maharashtra 

16 Manipur 

13 1468 8094 9562 

21 678 _ 678 

23 

1659 5000 6659 

139 13512 6090 19602 

Nil Nil 6683 6683 

Nil Nil Nil Nil 

33 

12 

4 

19 

259 3264 3523 

534 2279 2813 

Nil 10894 10894 

725 6092 6817 

Nil Nil 11313 11313 


31 4657 4880 9537 

6 

599 8549 9148 

44 2493 10371 12864 


Total No. of 

Anganwadi 

Centres

17 Meghalaya 

18 Mizoram 

19 Nagaland 

20 Orissa 

21 Punjab 

22 Rajasthan 

23 Sikkim 

24 Tamil Nadu 

25 Tripura 

26 Uttar Pradesh 

27 Uttaranchal 

28 West Bengal 

29 A & N Islands 

30 Chandigarh 

31 Delhi 

32 Dadra & N Haveli 

33 Daman & Diu 

34 Lakshadweep 

35 Pondicherry 

TOTAL 

7 307 654 961 

2 13 218 231 

2 35 230 265 

Nil Nil 3279 3279 

6 463 2228 2691 

17 1855 9186 11041 

6 

124 364 488 

Nil Nil 3049 3049 

11 550 1670 2220 

1 99 31399 31498 

Nil Nil 1134 1134 

58 

5123 11977 17100 

Nil Nil 94 94 

Nil Nil 29 29 


1 77 Nil 77 

Nil Nil 10 10 


Nil Nil 11 11 

456 

35230 

149041 1,84,271

A-N"IG"UR~ lL 

GANTT CHART FOR INITIATION OF NEW ICDS PROJECTS AND ANGANWADI CENTRES WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE 

YEAR 

Activity No. 

6 

7" 

:[ 

~ 10 

11 

12 

13 

Note: 

Activity! Months 10 11 12 

l~t~~s~0~:ia conveys sanction of projects to 

Istates! UTs sanction Projects 

Appointment of COPO (addITional chargOi 

deputation! transfer) 

coPas training (in cases of deputation/ transfer) 

Selection of new Supervisors 

recruITment) 

(from AWWs and direct 

Existing Supervisors to supervise new AWC 

Training of new Supervisors 

Selection of AWWs/ Hel ers 

Training of AWWs/ Helpers 

'Procurement of materiaV equlpments 

Selection of AW Building 

Send materiaV equipment to AWCs 

Settln~up(functioning) ofAWCs I I I I I I I I I I I 

The direct recruITment of Supervisors/ 

operational within a period of one year 

coPas may be completed within a period of 10 months so as to make alilCOS Projects/ AWC,

J. Stortprojo". 

2. 

Govt. MIndio ooovoy' 

oumbor of projoets 

&11000tod .to Sto"./UT. 

3. Stot" oend pcojoet 

propo'010. 

ar.. 

4. 

Govt. of Iodio ooovoyo 

opprovol of pcojoet aro... 

5. Stort '"pointooot of COPO,. 

6. SOort appointmoot 

Sovik.. . 

of Mukhy. 

Complo" 

CDPO,. 

appoiotmont of 

G. Complete appoio"'oot of 

Mukhyo Savika.. 

g. "'d COPO.for «oioiog. 

10. Traioio, of CDPO, oomploto. 

PERT CHART 0' INSTALLA..ON OF ICOS PROJECT. 

SOod Mukhyo sovi>.. for troinin,. 

12. Troioiog of Mukhya Sovi>.. oompleeo. 

13 . Solootioo of AWW, by M55/CDFOo. 

14. Sood ADganwadi N"k." for traini". 

15. AogaDwodi Workers traioiog oomplo". 

16. Stort pcooorem", of m"oriel by otot". 

17. proommoot oemplo". 

18. Soleot Aogaowad( Workers' buildi09'. 

19. Sood stm-proo",,' muteriol to Ch, proj,,". 

20. Stort proourem"t of .""ial by CDPO. 

21. CompMo prooo«m"t of mot,riol by CDPO. 

22 . S"d moterial to tho AngaD"d;,. 

23. Iostoll'rion of Aoganwo'i, oomplete. 

~ 8--- 

..,""- 

"",..""",- 

(A

StatementIndicatingStatewise details of 

Budget Provisionfor SNP underICOS 

durin 2005.06(uodatedas on 17.11.2005) 

IRs.,lakhl' 

"'ea," 

".No. """'"' 

1 

2 

1 Andhra Pradesh 4745.42 

2 Arunachal Pradesh 113.41 

3 Assam 1914.88 

4 Bihar 3864.1 

5 Chhatti50arh 

276118 

6 Goa 75.65 

7 Gu'arat 2959.17 

8 Haryana 

1810.62 

9 Himachal Pradesh 602.91 

10 Jammu & Kashmir 343.56 

11 Jharkhand 761.49 

12 Karnataka 4678.99 

13 Kerala 1647.53 

14 Madhva Pradesh 5457.86 

15 Maharashtra 565915 

16 Manipur 

664.58 

17 Moohalava 339.96 

16 Mizoram 21783 

19 NaQaland 

434.81 

20 Orissa 6697.98 

21 Punjab 904.78 

22 Raasthan 5123.12 

23 Sikkim 69.24 

24 Tamil Nadu 3703.69 

25 TOpura 

26071 

26 Uttar Pradesh 11416.65 

27 Uttaranchal 705.n 

28 West Benoal 6346.24 

29 A & N Islands 40.2 


60.74 

e I .41 

32 Dadra & N Haveli 2269 

33 Daman & Diu 13.74 

34 Lakshadweep 

752 

35 Po""icherry 63.59 

TOTAL 

7""7.82 

"1~ 

kNNpUI2.L III

"",",- 

CHAMAN KUMAR 

JOINT SECRETARY 

F.No.16-10/2005-ME A=NN~Jl)i'.$ N 

Fax No. :23381495 

Fax No.: 23381800 

Fax No.: 23381654 

Tele~,"ms: WOMEN CHILD 

'm,r'1wpR 

~I'iq xmlCFr f'i'liH1 >i'lri'PI 

("(%,"1 ~iOT!i1!" ~RT 1'1'11'1) 

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOUr1CE DEVELOPMENr 

(DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN & CHILD DEVELOPMENT) 

17.10.2005 

TeL23386227 >rw.ft 'FA, "~ fi:c~ -- 110001,fu-'Ii'li--------- 

Shast,' Bhawan, New Delhi-110001, Dated 

Dear 

As you are well aware that the large scale prevalence of malnotrition in children, in 

our country is a cause of concern for all 01 us. The NFHS-lI, which was conducted in 1998- 

99, estimated that 47% of the children in our country were malnourished. We have tricd to 

analyse tile data gathered through our ICDS monitoring system in the last four years. 

Statewise statcments indicating the nutritional status of children for tile last four ycars, as 

rcported by the state governments, is eoclosed- As pe' this data, 4468% of the children (0-6 

years) were normal (i.e- they were not underoourishcd) as on 31" Match, 2002. This figure 

stands at 47.85% as on 31" March 2005- While there may be some inaccuracy in the data, but 

what is abundantly clear is tbat there has been only a marginal decrease in the percentage of 

undernourished children. Situation with regard to the cbildren in Grade 1lI and Grade TV of 

malnutrition is particularly bad in case of.Bihar (21.05%), i\runanchal Pradesh (13.08%), 

.1harkhand (5.02%) and Madhya Pradesh (3_56%). It leads one tu infer that the ICaS 

Scheme is not baving its desired impact. 

India is a committed to achieving the Millennium Development Goals. One of the 

goals is "Eradication of extreme poverty and hnnger", and the target stipulated is "Halve, 

between 1990-2015 the proportion of people who suffer from Indicator foc this 

target is "Prevalence of under weight children under 5 of Tbe Tenth Plan also 

stipulates that the percentage of onder nourished children tilan of age woold be 

reduced by 50% of the current levels (for weight for age, below SD) and percentage 

wlder-nourished children below 3 years (with weight for age -2 SO), would be 

reduced tram the current level of 47% to 40%. 

Tbere are a host of tactors that are associated with malnutrition amongst children. 

These are - access to toad, food habits and dietary intakes, ignorance about breast feeding, 

lack of nutrition and bealth education, access to health facilllies, poor health status of 

motbers and hence low birth weights etc. 

that 1CDS is the most important intervention, which can help us in 

eradication of extreme bunger and povcrty. The integrated nature of 

under ICDS is an effective tool to figbt malnutrition amongst children. 

, 1°'

- 2- 

Government of India has recently sanctioned additional angaowadi tenters in the country. 

It has also been decided that tbe Government ofIndia would liear 50% of the cost of 

Supplementary Nutrition (subject to a ceiling of Rs. I per child per d.y). All these measures 

of expansion and enrichment of the quality of services would go a lobg way in meeting the 

goals we set forth. But mnch would depend upon the effective implem~ntation of the scheme. 

I would request you to take immediate steps so that all the services uoder ICDS are properly 

delivered. r wnuld also request you to pay special attention towards improving the nutritional 

status of children. Some ofthe measures that could be taken are: 

a. Giving priority to opening up of new centers in areas where prevalence of 

b. 

malnutrition is high. 

Focus on improving tlle coverage 

- 

of the scheme, so that all eligible children get 

services under rCDS. 

d. 

e. 

f. 

g. 

h. 

Emphasis on Nutrition and Health Education. 

Effective convergence with activities of other departments. 

Involving community in the implementation and monitoring of the scheme. 

Ensure that growth monitoring is being done properly. 

Organising the supply logistics in a manner such that the anganwadis get supply 

of provisions well in time. 

Popularising breast-feeding. 

I would also welcome suggestions from your side regarding measures to combat 

malnutrition amongst children. 

fa 

With regards 

-I\~s.\-R\:o...£:""-"-""~~ 

~ 

c\"-~ vl-.'M '+=

jJ~fitional Status of Children under ICDS Scheme as on 31s~ March 2002 

SI. 

No. 

StatefUT 

All India -> 44,68% 35.47% 18.52% 1.41% 

#ason31.12.2001 $ as on 30.11.2001 NA - Not available 

- t1-r 

Classification of Nutritional Status 

w 

Normal Grade-I Grade-II Gr-III&IV Total 

1 Andhra Pradesh 39.95% 34.94% 24.54% : 0.57% 100.00% 

2 Arunachal Pradesh 64.85% 12.08% 9.99% 13.08% 100.00% 

3 Assam 50.98% 31.87% 14.00'/. 3.14% 100.00% 

4 Bihar# 47.66% 9.65% 21.64'/, 21.05% 100.00% 

5 Chhattisgarh 41.02% 35.94% 21.60% 1.45% 100.00% 

6 Goa 54.26% 36.65% 8.89'/, 0.21% 100.00% 

7 Gujarat 33.93% 39.89% 25.02'/. 1.16% 100.00% 

8 Haryana 45.83% 34.19% 19.79% 0.19% 100.00% 

9 Himachal Pradesh 59.15% 31.14% 9.54'1d 0.18% 100.00% 

10 Jammu & Kashmir 

11 Jharkhand 

58.16% 

42.47% 

29.54% 

33.25% 

10.30% 

19.26'/d 

" 

2.00% 

5.02% 

100.00% 

100.00% 

12 Karnataka 42.63% 38.87% 18.08% 0.42% 100.00% 

13 Kerala 53.49% 37.44% 8.97% 0.09% 100.00% 

1 Madhya Pradesh 46.48% 32.14% 17.82% 3.56% 100.00% 

15 Maharashtra$ 41.12% 39.86% 18.50% 0.52% 100.00% 

16 Manipur 83.89% 2.14% 13.57% 0.40% 100.00% 

17 Meghalaya 51.16% 34.38% 13.85% 0.60% 100.00% 

18 Mizoram# 70.57% 19.99% 9.06% 0.38% 100.00% 

19 Nagaland 90.56% 7.67% 1.59% 0.18% 100.00% 

20 Orissa$ 37.50% 37.10% 24.25% 1.15% 100.00% 

21 Punjab 61.36% 32.42% 5.15% 1.07% 100.00% 

22 Rajasthan# 47.17% 35.19% 20.83% 0.26% 103.45% 

23 Sikkim 64.74% 25.28% 9.35'A' : i 0.63% 100.00% 

24 Tamil Nadu 48.09% 37.79% 13.60'// 0,53% 100.00% 

25 Tripura 74.23% 18.61% 6.04% 1.12% 100.00% 

26 Uttar Pradesh 45.18% 32.36% 20.67% 1.78% 100.00% 

27 Uttaranchal 56.19% 33.61% 9.58'/.' i. 0.63% 100.00% 

28 West Bengal 42.31% 35.80% 20.54% 1.35% 100.00% 

29 A & N Islands 91.66% 7.23% 0.60% 0.51% 100.00% 

30 Chandigarh 66.35% 28.40% 5.24% 0.01% 100.00% 

31 Delhi 44.75% 32,19% 22.70'A" 0.37% 100.00% 

32 Dadra & N Haveli 19.36% 49.87% 26.56'/J 4.21% 100.00% 

33 Daman & Diu NA NA NA NA NA 

34 Lakshadweep NA NA NA " NA NA 

35 Pondicherry 53.41% 36.85% 9.73% .0.00% 100.00%

!.;', &;> 

I'tritional 

IT' 

Status of Children under (CDS Scheme as 0.1 31~t March 2003 

Ii' 

I 

51. 

No. 

State/UT 

Classification of Nutritional'Status 

i 

Normal Grade-I Grade-II IGr-III&IV Total 

1 Andhra Pradesh 42.32% 34.89% 22.49'(, 0.30% 100.00% 

2 Arunachal Pradesh 69.45% 18.55% 8.45% . 3.55% 100.00% 

3 Assam$ 50.98% 31.87% 14.0Q% 3.14% 100.00% 

4 Bihar$ 47.66% 9.65% 21.64"(, 21.05% 100.00% 

5 Chhattisgarh 42.33% 35.15% 21.21% 1.24% 100.00% 

6 Goa 54.89% 35.87% 9.02% 0.23% 100.00% 

7 Gujarat 34.87% 39.82% 24.23% : 1.08% 100.00% 

8 Haryana 49.17% 33.97% 16.49% 0.36% 100.00% 

9 Himachal Pradesh 58.00% 31.63% 10.21% 0.16% 100.00% 

10 Jammu & Kashmir 64.12% 28.91% 6.71% 0.26% 100.00% 

11 Jharkhand 40.65% 31.08% 21,84% , 6.42% 100.00% 

12 Karnataka 43.08% 38.11% 18.43% i 0.38% 100.00% 

13 Kerala 59.39% 32.61% 7.92% 0.08% 100.00% 


15 Maharashtra 45.53% 38.77% 15.39% 0.31% 100.00% 

16 Manipur 83.89% 2.14% 13.51% 0.40% 100.00% 

17 Meghalaya 54.67% 31.85% 13.05% 0.43% 100.00% 

18 Mizoram 70.85% 21.19% 7.40% 0.57% 100.00% 

19 Naaaland 88.60% 8.96% 2.06% 0.38% 100.00% 

20 Orissa 38.50% 37.08% 23.45% 0.98% 100.00% 

21 Punjab 62.51% 32.45% 4.26% 0.78% 100.00% 

22 Rajasthan 49.80% 37.56% 24.88% 0.33% 112.58% 

23 Sikkim 67.89% 24.71% 6.99% 0.42% 100.00% 

24 Tamil Nadu 51.48% 37.66% 10.54% 0.32% 100.00% 

25 Tripura 68.57% 21.97% 8.80% : 0.65% 100.00% 

26 Uttar Pradesh 46.61% 32.31% 19.47% 1.61% 100.00% 

27 Utiaranchal 56.78% 32.55% 10.3:1% 0.34% 100.00% 

28 West Bengal 43.59% 36.35% 19.04% !! 1.01% 100.00% 

29 A & N Islands 91.66% 7.23% 0.60% ,i 0.51% 100.00% 

30 Chandigarh 67.26% 28.18% 4.56% , : 0.00% 100.00% 

31 Delhi 44.75% 32.19% 22.70% :. 0.37% 100.00% 

32 Dadra & N Haveli 22.07% 50.90% 25.14% '1.90% 100.00% 

33 Daman & Diu NA NA Ni'- ,.' NA NA 

34 Lakshadweep NA NA NA NA NA 

35 Pondicherry 57.17% 36.62% 6.21'(, 0.00% 100.00% 

All India -> 46.59% 35.29% 17.52% : 1.04% 100.43% 

- '3- 

)

!i" 

Nutritional Status of Children under ICDS Scheme as bn!1st March 2004 

SI. 

No. 

State/UT 

Classification of Nutritiohal Status 

Normal Grade-! Grade-Ii 'Gr-III&IV Total 

1 Andhra Pradesh 44.80% 34.51% 20.34% ,' 0.36% 100.00% 

2 Arunachal Pradesh 62.72% 30.49% 3.97% 2.82% 100.00% 

3 Assam# NA NA !'IA' NA NA 

4 Bihar 30.92% 27.01% 23.21% \ 18.86% 100.00% 

5 Chhattisgarh 44.89% 33.59% 20.23% 1.29% 100.00% 

6 Goa 55.14% 35.65% 9.0% 0.19% 100.00% 

7 Gujarat 36.27% 39.49% 23.87% 1.21% 100.83% 

8 Haryana 51.27% 34.73% 13.70% 0.30% 100.00% 


10 Jammu & Kashmir 67.82% 24.99% 6.92% j 0.27% 100.00% 

11 Jharkhand 44.85% 32.25% 18.97% 3.93% 100.00% 

12 Karnataka 44.00% 38.20% 17.36% 0.44% 100.00% 

13 Kerala 60.01% 32.28% 7.64% 0.07% 100.00% 


15 Maharashtra 46.48% 38.26% 14.95% 0.30% 100.00% 

16 Manipur 89.52% 1.54% 8.78% 0.16% 100.00% 

17 Meghalaya 58.80% 30.71% 10.13% 0.35% 100.00% 

18 Mizoram 70.30% 21.10% 7.74% 0.85% 100.00% 


20 Orissa 39.17% 36.75% 23.19% 0.89% 100.00% 

21 Punjab 62.58% 32.61% 4.10% 0.70% 100.00% 

22 Rajasthan 45.24% 33.31% 20.31% 1.07% 100.00% 

23 Sikkim 70.08% 23.63% 6.00% ' 0.28% 100.00% 

24 Tamil Nadu 56.48% 37.13% 6.26% . 0.13% 100.00% 

25 Tripura 68.42% 22.84% 7.99% 0.74% 100.00% 

26 Uttar Pradesh 47.30% 32.38% 19.09% 1.23% 100.00% 

27 Uttaranchal 56.23% 32.26% 11.29% 0.22% 100.00% 

28 West Bengal 43.45% 36.70% 18.81% 1.04% 100.00% 

29 A & N Islands 91.93% 6.22% 1.61% i 0.24% 100.00% 

30 Chandigarh 64.78% 29.71% 5.50% i 0.01% 100.00% 

31 Delhi 46.29% 30.25% 21.81% 1.64% 100.00% 

32 Dadra & N Haveli 53.80% 30.30% 15.10% 0.79% 100.00% 


34 Lakshadweep NA NA NA NA NA 

35 Pondicherry 53.65% 37.90% 8.45% 0.00% 100.00% 

All India -> 47.00% 35.00% 16.87% 1.20% 100.08% 

#8'°03011.2003. 

- Iy. 

~

'f 

(f) 

Nutritional Status of Children under ICDS SchemJias on 31st March 

2005 I; 

51. 

No. 

5tate/UT 

Classification of Nutritional ,Status 

Normal Grade-I Grade-i!, 

_"'- 

Grade-III & 

IV 

Total 

1 Andhra Pradesh 47.07% 31.86% 20.91% ,' 0.16%100.00% 

2 Arunachal Pradesh 69.94% 21.20% 8.54% ;,0.33% 100.00% 

3 Assam# 57.00% 30.24% 11.02% 1.74% 100.00% 

4 Bihar NA NA NA. NA 

5 Chhattisgarh 

6 Goa 

43.27% 

56.15% 

35.27% 

35.49% 

20.2% 

8.17'(, 

: 1.24% 

i 0.19% 

100.00% 

100.00% 

7 Gujarat 35.85% 39.34% 23.75% ; 1.05% 100.00% 

8 Haryana 51.87% 34.67% 13.2% 0.24% 100.00% 


10 Jammu & Kashmir 63.07% 29.28% 7.40% 0.25% 100.00% 

11 Jharkhand 43.04% 32.33% 20.62% 4.01% 100.00% 

12 Karnataka 44.45% 37.57% 17.59% 0.40% 100.00% 

13 Kerala 53.06% 37.96% 8.91% 0.07% 100.00% 


15 Maharashtra 44.20% 39.81% 15.68% 0.31% 100.00% 

16 Manipur 89.37% 1.66% 8.81% 0.17% 100.00% 

17 Meghalava 63.88% 31.83% 9.77% 0.26% 100.00% 

18 Mizoram 74.11% 18.12% 7.41% 0.36% 100.00% 


20 Orissa 41.22% 37.31% 20.70% ! 0.77% 100.00% 

21 Punjab 62.02% 33.05% 4.2'10 ,0.65% 100.00% 

22 Rajasthan 45.04% 33.46% 21.05% ",0.45% 100.00% 

23 5ikkim 86.65% 10.77% 2.51% 0.07% 100.00% 

24 Tamil Nadu 57.69% 37.37% 4.84% 0.10% 100.00% 

25 Tripura 

26 Uttar Pradesh 

67.49% 

46.98% 

23.53% 

32.36% 

8.43% 

19.4S'Z, 

,; 

:' 

0.55% 100.00% 

1.21% 100.00% 

27 Ultaranchal 54.15% 33.07% 12.5% i 0.25% 100.00% 

28 West Bengal 45.36% 36.63% 17.32% ,:: 0.68% 100.00% 

29 A & N Islands 91.14% 7.52% 1.09% 0.24% 100.00% 


31 Delhi 

66.43% 

46.55% 

28.78% 

32.32% 

4.79% 

20.9t'i, 

'; 

:' 

0.00% 

0.16% 

100.00% 

100.00% 

32 Dadra & N Haveli 19.62% 52.21% 27.36% 0.79% 100.00% 


34 Lakshadweep NA NA NA -j NA NA 

35 Pondicherry 54.41% 37.79% 7.79% 0.00% 100.00% 

All India -> 47.85% 35.11% 16.3% 1.55% 100.00%

ANNEXURE-V 

STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE FOR THE PURPOSE OF 

RELEASE OF FUNDS UNDER KISHORI SHAKTI YOJANA 

(KSY) 

Name of the State_____________ 

I. Physical 

1. Number of KSY Projects 

(i) Sanctioned_____________________ 

(ii) Operational_____________________ 

II. FINANCIAL 

Financial Year________________ 

Quarter No________________ 

PART A 

PART B 

KSY 

1. Funds released during previous Financial Year by GOI Rs.___________ 

2. Expenditure incurred in previous Financial Year Rs.___________ 

3. Unutilized balance (or excess expenditure) 

of previous Financial Year Rs.___________ 

4. Opening Balance for the current Financial Year Rs.__________ 

PART C 

1. Opening Balance for the Quarter Rs_________ 

2. Funds received from GOI during the quarter Rs_________ 

3. Total funds available during the quarter (1+2) Rs_________ 

4. Funds utilized during the Quarter Rs._________ 

5. Closing Balance at the end of the quarter (3-4) Rs__________ 

6. Cumulative funds utilized during the year Rs__________ 

1 of 2

UTILIZATION CERTIFICATE 

Annexure-V (Continued) 

Certified that out of the total amount of Rs.____, available* 

under Kishori Shakti Yojana (KSY) upto the end of quarter (--------) in 

the financial year 200_ - 200_, a sum of Rs.___________________ 

has been utilized, during the quarter (----------) as per schematic norms 

and for the same purpose for which the amount was released. 

Signature of the Authorized Officer 

* Amount available would include the opening balance for the quarter and the amount 

released received during the quarter. 

2 of 2

Quarterly Progress Report 

Consolidated District-wise Statement indicating Status of Kishori Shakti Yojana for the Quarter ending ______Year_______. 

(Information in respect of ICDS Projects during the entire year where Kishori Shakti Yojana is being implemented may be furnished) 

State : _____________________________ 

Sl. 

No. 

Name of the District where KSY 

block(s) sanctioned 

Number of the ICDS Project(s) where KSY 

Sanctioned 

Operational 

Operational 

Number of AWCs 

implementing KSY 

No. of Adolescent 

Girls identified 

Taken vocational 

training/ NHE/ Non 

Formal Education 

SNP beneficaries [out 

of the beneficiaries 

mentioned in col. (8)] 

ANNEXURE - VI 

No. of beneficiaries (During the quarter under report) 

Received 

IFA/Deworming 

supplementation [out of 

the beneficiaries 

mentioned in col. (8)] 

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) 

District - 1----> 

District - 2 ----> 


STATE TOTAL ---->

Annual Progress Report 

Consolidated District-wise Statement indicating Status of Kishori Shakti Yojana for the Year_______. 

(Information in respect of ICDS Projects during the entire year where Kishori Shakti Yojana is being implemented may be furnished) 

State : _____________________________ 

Sl. 

No. 

Name of the District and Blocks 

where KSY block(s) sanctioned 

Sanctioned operational sanctioned operational 

Taken vocational training/ SNP beneficaries [out of the 

NHE/ Non Formal beneficiaries mentioned in col. 

Education (8)] 

ANNEXURE - VII 

Received IFA/Deworming 

supplementation [out of the 

beneficiaries mentioned in col. 

(8)] 

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) 

District - 1----> 

Block-1 

Block-2 


Block-1 

Block-2 


STATE TOTAL ----> 

FORMAT-III-KSY-CONSOLIDATED-quarterly rep 

Number of the ICDS Project(s) where KSY 

Number of AWCs 

No. of Adolescent 

Girls identified 

No. of beneficiaries (During the year)

Statement showing State-wise funds released and the balance available with the State Government 

during 2002-03 & 2003-04 under Nutrition Programme ffor Adolescent Girls (NPAG) 

S.No. States/UTs 

Amount 

Released (Rs., in 

lakh) 

2002-03 2003-04 

Amount Utilised 

(Rs., in lakh) 

Food grain 

allotted 

(in MTs) 

Foodgrains lifted 

(in MTs) 

Balance available 

with the S/G as 

on 1. 4.2003 

Amount 

Released (Rs., 

in lakh) 

Amount 

Utilised (Rs., in 

lakh) 

Food grain 

allotted (in 

MTs) 

ANNEXURE - VIII 

Balance available 

Foodgrains 

with the S/G as 

lifted (in MTs) 

on 1.4.2004 

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) 

1 Andhra Pradesh 527.78 5533.3 420 22100 

2 Arunachal Pradesh 4.23 33.3 3 100 

3 Assam 124.51 1266.7 100 5000 

4 Bihar 412.24 5733.3 330 23000 

5 Chattisgarh 129.55 1766.7 104 7100 

6 Goa 44.11 433.3 35 1700 

7 Gujarat 309.17 3233.3 247 12900 

8 Haryana 98.44 1266.6 79 5100 

9 Himachal Pradesh 70.63 933.3 57 3700 

10 Jammu & Kashmir 68.41 666.7 55 2700 

11 Jharkhand 140.1 1900 112 7700 

12 Karnataka 504.62 5300 358 21200 

13 Kerala 266.21 2400 213 9600 

14 Madhya Pradesh 219.93 3033.3 176 12200 

15 Maharashtra 600.81 6266.7 481 25100 

16 Manipur 16.78 166.7 13 600 

17 Meghalaya 18.22 166.7 15 700 

18 Mizoram 6.93 66.7 6 300 

19 Nagaland 17.23 166.7 14 600 

20 Orissa 281.32 3033.3 205 12100 

21 Punjab 114.03 1300 91 5100 

22 Rajasthan 184.95 2566.7 148 10200 

23 Sikkim 7.38 66.7 6 200 

24 Tamil Nadu 213.25 2133.3 171 8500 

25 Tripura 90.57 900 72 3600 

26 Uttar Pradesh 248.44 3400.1 199 13700 

27 Uttaranchal 82.67 1100 66 4400 

28 West Bengal 593.23 6300 228 25200 

29 Andaman & Nicobar 200 800 

30 Chandigarh 300 1200 

31 Daman & Diu 100.0 500 

32 D & NH 200 800 

33 Delhi 700 2800 

34 Lakshdweep 33.3 100 

35 Pondicherry 100 400 

Total 5395.74 62766.7 4004 251000

Sub: State's Secretaries Meeting to be held on 1.12.2005 - Agenda note 

pertaining to World Bank assisted ICDS-III Project sans Udisha - reg. 

World Bank assisted ICDS-III Project sans Udisha was approved in March, 

1999 with an outlay of Rs.1011.00 crore for a period of 5 years. States of Kerala, 

Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh were covered. 

2. The Project was restructured in April, 2003. States of Bihar, Chhattisgarh, 

Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Uttaranchal were included w.e.f. 

1.10.2002. 4496 numbers of Model Anganwadi Centre Buildings were also to be 

constructed in non-World Bank, non-NE and Sikkim States. The project outlay got 

increased to Rs.1420.58 crore. 

3. The Project has since been extended by 18 months upto 31.3.2006 with an 

enhanced outlay of Rs.1433.25 crore. 

4. Some time back, an exercise was undertaken in consultation with Project 

States to assess their requirements of funds by the end of the Project. It was 

concluded that total approved outlay of Rs.1433.25 crore would be utilized. It could 

also be deciphered that the provisions made towards payments on account of 

salary/honoraria/contingencies/POL etc, would not last for all the States upto the 

end of the Project i.e. 31.3.2006. 

5. A statement giving a financial overview in respect of ICDS-III Project is 

available at Annexure ____. 

6. There is no problem respecting Orissa, Uttaranchal and Tamil Nadu. 

Salary/honoraria to ICDS functionaries in these States is being paid out of the 

funds released under ICDS (General) Scheme. Position is no different in the cases 

of the states of Gujarat, West Bengal, Karnataka, Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir, 

Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Pondicherry and Andaman & Nicobar Islands which 

have been covered under the Project for the purposes of construction of Model 

Anganwadi Buildings only. 

6. Sufficient funds are available with the State of Kerala for making payments 

towards salaries/honoraria to the ICDS functionaries upto 31.3.2006. However, 

funds available to other States will exhaust at different points of times. In 

Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, funds are expected to last 

uptill 31.1.2006. But such a date in respect of Madhya Pradesh and Bihar will 

respectively be 31 st October, 2005 and 30 th November, 2005. 

7. Above position is as per estimates made in this Department. States are, 

however, requested to work out the component-wise savings without exceeding the 

item-wise allocation in any circumstances. Unspent allocations under the 

components can be used for payments of salaries/honoraria/ POL/contingency etc. 

Based on the exercise so carried out, States may kindly indicate the date upto 

which they would be able to meet expenditure under salaries head without 

exceeding the allocations.

STATE ALLOCA 

TION 

WORKING OUT THE REQUIREMENTS OF FUNDS FOR ICDS-III (EXCLUDING UDISHA){Rs in crores} 

SOEs 

submitted 

till June 

2005 

(EXPEND 

ITURE) 

SOE 

pertainin 

g to 

ICDS-II 

DOUBLE 

CLAIMS 

(TO BE 

REFUND 

ED) 

Exp till 

June 

2005 

State 

Share in 

allocation 

GOI share 

in 

allocation 

Release 

till Sept. 

05 

Exp till 

June 

2005 

Rs in crores 

Requirement of funds from July 05 to 

Mar 06. As arrived at in the review 

meeting 

Salaries/c 

ontingenci 

es/.POL 

Kerala 137.9045 127.48 0 0 127.48 5.12 132.78 133.05 127.48 19.8 12.15 0.97 32.92 5.57 5.12 -0.27 10.42 -2.7 2.20 0 * 

Maharashtra 217.8371 190.75 0 0 190.75 13.91 203.92 192.75 190.75 16 21.48 0 37.48 2 13.91 11.17 27.08 5.6 1.78 3 

Rajasthan 178.3183 154.73 0 0 154.73 10.41 167.9 168.67 154.73 20.97 10.14 0.56 31.67 13.94 10.41 -0.77 23.58 12.88 2.33 6 

Tamil Nadu 57.7806 49.9 0 0 49.9 0.45 57.3306 62.29 49.9 0.45 7.4 0.03 7.88 12.39 0.45 -4.9594 7.8806 0.4506 na 9 

Uttar Pradesh 245.5158 197.78 0 0 197.78 14.21 231.3 227.97 197.78 29.83 24.85 1 55.68 30.19 14.21 3.33 47.73 21.88 3.31 6 

Bihar 132.3988 121.09 0 19.22 101.87 0 132.39 107.72 101.87 49.5 5.15 0 54.65 5.85 0 24.67 30.52 25.37 5.50 5 

Chhattisgarh 86.8941 108.55 39.56 3.56 65.43 0 86.89 74.98 65.43 25.23 2.68 2.88 30.79 9.55 0 11.91 21.46 15.9 2.80 6 

Jharkhand 67.057 74.55 28.6 3.32 42.63 0 67.05 50.8 42.63 25.08 1.1 8.01 34.19 8.17 0 16.25 24.42 15.31 2.79 6 

Madhya Pradesh 217.6715 189.88 0 0 189.88 0 217.67 175.94 189.88 40.21 4.89 4.64 49.74 -13.94 0 41.73 27.79 18.26 4.47 4 

Orissa 30.4767 15.97 0 0 15.97 0 30.47 25.2 15.97 0 3.06 10.27 13.33 9.23 0 5.27 14.5 1.17 0.00 9 

Uttaranchal 14.8848 3.13 0 0 3.13 0 14.88 11 3.13 0 1.18 4.77 5.95 7.87 0 3.88 11.75 5.8 0.00 9 

Gujarat 7.5 1.95 0 0 1.95 0 7.5 6 1.95 0 0 5.55 5.55 4.05 0 1.5 5.55 0 0.00 9 

West Bengal 11.8 7 0 0 7 0 11.8 11.29 7 0 0 4.8 4.8 4.29 0 0.51 4.8 0 0.00 9 

Karnataka 6.42 4.46 0 0 4.46 0 6.42 5.26 4.46 0 0 1.96 1.96 0.8 0 1.16 1.96 0 0.00 9 

Haryana 4.15 3.44 0 0 3.44 0 4.15 4.09 3.44 0 0 0.71 0.71 0.65 0 0.06 0.71 0 0.00 9 

Jammu and Kashmir 3.98 0 0 0 0 0 3.98 3 0 0 0 3.98 3.98 3 0 0.98 3.98 0 0.00 9 

Punjab 4.68 0 0 0 0 0 4.68 4.69 0 0 0 4.68 4.68 4.69 0 -0.01 4.68 0 0.00 9 

Himachal Pradesh 2.37 0 0 0 0 0 2.37 1.9 0 0 0 2.37 2.37 1.9 0 0.47 2.37 0 0.00 9 

Pondicherry 0.18 0 0 0 0 0 0.18 0.17 0 0 0 0.18 0.18 0.17 0 0.01 0.18 0 0.00 9 

A & N Islands 0.65 0 0 0 0 0 0.65 0.15 0 0 0 0.65 0.65 0.15 0 0.5 0.65 0 0.00 9 

CPMU 4.75 3.72 0 0 3.72 0 4.75 3.72 3.72 1.03 0 0 1.03 0 0 1.03 1.03 1.03 0.00 9 

unallocated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

TOTAL 1433.219 1254.38 68.16 26.1 1160.12 44.1 1389.0606 1270.64 1160.1 228.1 94.08 58.01 380.19 110.52 44.1 118.4206 273.0406 120.9506 

* As per Director, Social Welfare, Kerala letter no. WB-A6/5207/05 dated 13.9.2005, expenditure of Rs.9228.93 lakh on salaries, POL and contingencies upto 30.6.2005 

includes the expenditure of Rs. 1809.264 lakh towards additional honoraria @ Rs. 300 p.m. per Anganwadi Worker and Helper sanctioned by State of Kerala w.e.f. 1.4.2001. 

This is a wrong booking and calls for immediate necessary action for rectification. 

Procurem 

ent, QIP 

etc 

Civil 

works 

TOTAL 

Balance 

with the 

States as 

on 1-7-05 

State 

Share in 

allocation 

TO BE 

RELEASE 

D BY GOI 

AVAILABI 

LITY OF 

FUNDS 

AVAILABL 

E FOR 

SALARIES 

salary 

EXP PER 

MONTH 

MONTHS 

AVAILAB 

LE

THE MEETING OF STATE SECRETARIES TO BE HELD ON 1-12-2005 

So far as Udisha Project is concerned, there is a total allocation of 

Rs.409.03 crores upto 31-3-06. Out ofthe allocation ofRs.382.81 crores for 

StatesfUTs an amount of Rs.320.72 crores has been released. Out of the 

released amount SOEs for an amount of Rs.281.33 crores has been received 

till 21-11-2005. 

Some of the StatesfUTs have not been able to send SOEs as per the 

released amount. Besides, some StatesfUTs have not sent their STRAP 

proposals or incomplete proposals. The latest position regarding receipt of 

SOEs, STRAP proposals, QPRs have been sunnnarized in a statement 

attaches. StatesfUTs are requested to bring the papers/documents, which 

have not been submitted indicating the latest position to discuss the same in 

the meeting.

Sl. No. Name of the State Allocation 

(1999-2006) 

Funds 

released till 

date 

SOEs 

received and 

date 

Audit 

Disallowances 

Amount 

approved in 

STRAP 05-06 

QPR received 

upto 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

1 Andhra Pradesh 4,527.65 4,443.90 

2 Arunachal Pradesh 235.04 177.77 

3 Assam 856.80 832.14 

4 Bihar 1,757.92 728.77 

5 Chhatisgarh 1,100.00 1,004.72 

6 Goa 67.92 35.17 

7 Gujarat 1,604.87 1,039.19 

8 Haryana 547.19 536.27 

9 Himachal Pradesh 378.90 282.53 

10 Jammu & Kashmir 756.77 

11 Jharkhand 331.04 

12 Karnataka 1,632.31 

13 Kerala 1,680.04 

World Bank Assisted ICDS Training Programme - Project Udisha 

Status of States/UTs as on 21.11.05 

604.83 

331.04 

1,383.17 

1,579.98 

4889.96 

31.3.05 

148.49 

31.3.05 

730.45 

31.3.05 

594.98 

30.6.05 

940.43 

30.9.05 

34.24 

30.6.05 

848.27 

30.6.05 

513.97 

30.6.05 

274.10 

30.6.05 

286.58 

31.3.05 

209.90 

30.6.05 

1335.45 

30.9.05 

1418.17 

30.6.05 

1,477.45 - 

- - 

336.26 - 

- 1,004.30 

210.37 172.08 

- 6.51 

21.60 192.32 

- - 

40.41 48.17 

- - 

2.27 - 

62.14 349.10 

54.61 - 

30-Jun-05 

30-Jun-04 

30-Sep-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Jun-05 

31-Mar-05 

31-Dec-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Jun-05 

Remarks 

(Rs. Lakh) 

A STRAP proposal of Rs. 652.04 lakh processed. A further 

proposal dated 18.11.05 sought additional Rs. 324.83 lakh, 

making a total of Rs. 976.87 lakh 

STRAP not submitted. Reminder sent from Director on 

3/11/2005. No QPR for the last one-year 

STRAP submitted showing different backlog figures than 

what was given in the Review Meeting 

Rs. 50.00 lakh released against the request of Rs. 95.28 

lakh 

Revised STRAP received. Clear picture of of Allocation and 

Expenditure not given 

Requested to resubmit 

STRAP Not submitted 

Requested to resubmit


(1999-2006) 

Funds 

released till 

date 

SOEs 


date 

Audit 

Disallowances 

Amount 

approved in 

STRAP 05-06 

QPR received 

upto 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

14 Madhya Pradesh 3,970.36 

15 Maharashtra 3,199.17 

3,522.91 

2,930.39 

16 Manipur 371.22 208.35 

17 Meghalaya 169.83 185.53 

18 Mizoram 175.92 159.91 

19 Nagaland 247.57 247.57 

20 Orissa 1,320.19 

21 Punjab 512.11 

22 Rajasthan 2,475.39 

989.62 

358.06 

2,300.19 

23 Sikkim 57.07 49.00 

24 Tamil Nadu 1,587.68 

25 Tripura 371.54 

26 Uttar Pradesh 5,011.65 

27 Uttaranchal 554.62 

28 West Bengal 2,524.49 

29 A & N Islands 32.77 

30 Chandigarh 9.55 

1,568.76 

244.41 

3,624.42 

345.94 

2,144.08 

30.56 

10.20 

1879.14 

30.6.05 

2709.33 

31.3.05 

199.74 

31.3.05 

178.76 

30.6.05 

146.30 

30.6.05 

181.97 

30.6.05 

947.48 

30.9.05 

293.50 

31.3.05 

1837.17 

30.9.05 

41.59 

30.6.05 

1562.38 

30.6.05 

237.57 

31.3.05 

3363.96 

30.9.05 

362.22 

30.6.05 

1808.62 

30.6.05 

8.60 

31.3.05 

130.10 440.20 

760.11 520.17 

- - 

30-Jun-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Sep-05 

1.14 - 30-Sep-05 

- 19.93 

- 29.31 

174.52 207.96 

49.41 87.90 

- 880.51 

8.06 4.05 

72.95 103.46 

1.97 40.80 

134.41 1,603.88 

29.02 41.98 

171.67 458.52 

- - 22.31 

- 0.66 

30-Sep-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Sep-05 

30-Jun-05 

30-Sep-05 

STRAP under process 

Allocation exceeded 

Remarks 

A proposal for Rs. 491.82 lakh was considered which was 

restricted to the balance allocation of Rs. 103.46 lakh 

Additional Proposal for Rs. 151.00 lakh received.


(1999-2006) 

Funds 

released till 

date 

SOEs 


date 

Audit 

Disallowances 

Amount 

approved in 

STRAP 05-06 

QPR received 

upto 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

31 Daman & Diu 5.23 

32 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 5.37 

33 Delhi 184.29 

34 Lakshadweep 5.20 

35 Pondicherry 14.14 

Total 

38,281.80 

0.50 

2.50 

151.21 

4.57 

14.14 

32,072.30 

139.29 

31.3.04 

10.62 

31.3.05 

28,133.23 

- - - 

- - - 

- - 

- - - 

3,738.47 

- 2.00 

6,236.12 

30-Jun-05 

30-Jun-03 

30-Jun-05 

30-Jun-03 

31-Dec-04 

No training proposal 

STRAP Not submitted 

Remarks 

The State was requested to divert the allocation under 

Other Training and IEC, etc. to Regular Training. The 

response has not been received. 

Requested to resubmit

(~~~~~) mffi ~l - Ministry of Women and Child Development

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?