01.08.2013 Views

Short Film Export Report - BFI

Short Film Export Report - BFI

Short Film Export Report - BFI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Genre<br />

Fiction 11<br />

Animation 7<br />

Documentary 1<br />

Total 19<br />

4.3 Observations based on this sample<br />

Animation (7)<br />

Documentary (1)<br />

4.3.1 Strong international appetite for UK shorts<br />

UK films received 14 % of the total prizes, comparing favourably with the 16% given to shorts<br />

from the USA and 12% to French-made shorts; particularly impressive given that no domestic<br />

festivals were included in the sample while the US and France picked up many of their awards<br />

in their home countries. British shorts have a proven ability to play well at both European and<br />

North American festivals as well as further afield (although East Asia is not represented in the<br />

sample, in recent years the UK has performed very well at shorts festivals in countries including<br />

Japan, Hong Kong and Singapore). This was confirmed by our consultations with international<br />

programmers, who talked of actively looking forward to the British Council‟s package of new<br />

films each year and of their admiration for the originality and skill of UK filmmakers.<br />

4.3.2 Diversity of films, filmmakers and of funding models<br />

Many filmmakers consulted felt that one of the festival scene‟s strengths was its openness to<br />

new voices, providing an important platform for talent that might not emerge through other<br />

routes like television or advertising. This is borne out by the data, which includes a wide range<br />

of genres and approaches and a strong showing for women and BME filmmakers. More recent<br />

festival successes also back this up, with a number of UK prize-winners emerging from the<br />

world of animation, music video or visual arts. 7 It‟s also important to note the range of funding<br />

sources including broadcasters, film-schools and Arts Council support, with a third benefitting<br />

from some form of UK <strong>Film</strong> Council funding and at least two thirds made with some element of<br />

self-funding.<br />

4.3.3 Significant proportion of self-distribution<br />

As well as funding their own shorts a large proportion of UK filmmakers distribute their work<br />

too. Reasons given for this included: failure to get picked up by an agent; a fear of losing half<br />

the return on the film in the form of sales commissions; or a lack of faith that the agent will<br />

represent their film effectively. However, many short film buyers do not have the time to deal<br />

with individual producers and prefer to pick up packages from agents or distributors. This<br />

predominance of self-distribution represents a missed opportunity for British short film, not just<br />

in terms of sales but also international visibility of the work, although self-distribution can reap<br />

rewards for some. (See Hibernation, below.)<br />

4.3.4 Festivals are hard work<br />

Many filmmakers talked of the time-consuming and expensive process of submitting to festivals<br />

and award schemes, coordinating print transport and representing a film internationally. The<br />

producers of Milk, a Scottish Digital <strong>Short</strong> which won the Golden Bear for Best <strong>Short</strong> at Berlin<br />

in 2005, totalled up the administrative and shipping costs and the human resources involved in<br />

festival promotion of the film. This was close to £5,000, as against the £1,200 which the film<br />

7 Crossovers between the film and art worlds are particularly striking here, with successes in 2008 for artists Ben<br />

Rivers and Desperate Optimists (Rotterdam) and Steve McQueen and Sam Taylor-Wood (Cannes).<br />

Drama (11)<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!