Supply Chain Management in Indian Petroleum Refineries
Supply Chain Management in Indian Petroleum Refineries
Supply Chain Management in Indian Petroleum Refineries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IN<br />
INDIAN PETROLEUM REFINERIES<br />
Thesis submitted to the<br />
COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY<br />
<strong>in</strong> partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the award<br />
of the Degree ofDoctor ofPhilosophy<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
under the Faculty ofSocial Sciences<br />
Under the supervision of<br />
Dr.M. BHASI<br />
Reader, School of<strong>Management</strong> Studies<br />
SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES<br />
COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY<br />
KOCHI - 682 002<br />
OCTOBER - 2003
DR. M. Bhasi M.Tech, Ph.D (IITKGP)<br />
Reader<br />
School of <strong>Management</strong> Studies<br />
Coch<strong>in</strong> university of Science and Technology<br />
Kochi - 682 022, Kerala<br />
Phone: (0484) 2575310 Extn - 241<br />
Email: mbhasi@cusat.ac.<strong>in</strong><br />
CERTIFICATE<br />
Certified that this thesis entitled "SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT<br />
IN INDIAN PETROLEUM REFINERIES", submitted to the Coch<strong>in</strong><br />
University of Science and Technology, Kochifor the award of Ph.D. Degree, is the<br />
record of bonafide research carried out by Mr. Kemthose P. Paul under my<br />
supervision and guidance at the School of <strong>Management</strong> Studies. This work did<br />
not form part of any dissertation submitted for the award of any degree, diploma,<br />
associate ship or other similar title or recognition from this or any other<br />
<strong>in</strong>stitution.<br />
Kochi-22.<br />
15-10-2003<br />
D. .Bhasi,<br />
(Supervis<strong>in</strong>g guide)
Abstract<br />
<strong>Petroleum</strong> oil is the lifeblood of a modern nation. The importance of its<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> is therefore evident. <strong>Petroleum</strong> oil supply cha<strong>in</strong>s are large flow type<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong>s. Sources of crude oil are fixed by natural availability to certa<strong>in</strong><br />
regions. Oil requirement is however more global with developed cold regions<br />
requir<strong>in</strong>g more of it. Economics dictate that ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is to be done nearer to<br />
demand locations. The first problem that is tackled <strong>in</strong> this thesis is that of<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g a model for ref<strong>in</strong>ery location selection. A multistage multi-factor<br />
model us<strong>in</strong>g weighted rank<strong>in</strong>g has been developed for this.<br />
Facility design and its creation lay the playground for operations. The<br />
importance of proper facilities plann<strong>in</strong>g is therefore worth not<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
importance of build<strong>in</strong>g flexibility of different types <strong>in</strong> to facility design is<br />
addressed <strong>in</strong> this thesis. The importance of flexibility is more because of<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> terms of availability and price of crude oil on one side and<br />
products demand on the other side, over the long life time of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Once facilities are ready, proper plann<strong>in</strong>g is necessary for their operations.<br />
For plann<strong>in</strong>g of ref<strong>in</strong>ery, supply cha<strong>in</strong> hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g model to suit the<br />
post Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism scenario <strong>in</strong> India is developed. The<br />
hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g models have annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, quarterly plann<strong>in</strong>g, monthly<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g, and daily plann<strong>in</strong>g modules <strong>in</strong>terconnected with appropriate data<br />
flows.<br />
In order to implement supply cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g and control models, an<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation flow system is essential. A model for such a system is also<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> the thesis.<br />
Lastly no study on operations is complete without look<strong>in</strong>g at the current<br />
operations and problems <strong>in</strong>volved there<strong>in</strong>. The <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound<br />
logistic system of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery (Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited) has been studied <strong>in</strong> detail.<br />
Bottlenecks, excess capacity, and other related problems are discussed <strong>in</strong> detail.<br />
Recommendations for solutions to some of the identified problems are also given<br />
<strong>in</strong> this thesis.<br />
The attempt <strong>in</strong> this thesis is there fore to look at ref<strong>in</strong>ery supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
problem <strong>in</strong> totality from locations plann<strong>in</strong>g to operations and to solve the relative<br />
problems.<br />
Key words: <strong>Petroleum</strong> oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery, <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management, Location,<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Information systems, Operations, and Models.
Table of Contents<br />
List of Figures Hi<br />
Listof Tables v<br />
Abbreviations vii<br />
Chapter I<br />
Introduction to the Study<br />
1.1 Introduction 1<br />
1.2 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> 3<br />
1.3 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Practices 5<br />
1.4 Literature on Importance of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> 9<br />
1.5 Importance of SCM to a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery 10<br />
1.6 This study and its objectives 12<br />
1.7 Scheme of the Study 12<br />
Chapter II<br />
Review of Literature<br />
2.1 Introduction 13<br />
2.2 Concept of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> 13<br />
2.3 Evolution of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>.. 14<br />
2.4 Location for a New Ref<strong>in</strong>ery 16<br />
2.5 Flexibility of Resources 18<br />
2.6 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g 19<br />
2.7 Integration of Operations 23<br />
2.8 Information Technology 24<br />
2.9 Tools Used <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> 27<br />
2.10 Conclusion 30<br />
Chapter III<br />
Model for Selection of New Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Location<br />
3.1 Introduction 32<br />
3.2 Global <strong>Petroleum</strong> <strong>Supply</strong><strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> 33<br />
3.3 <strong>Indian</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> 59<br />
3.4 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Location Selection Model 70<br />
3.5 Identification of Flexibility for Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Configuration 79<br />
3.6 Process Selection for an Oil Ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> India 90<br />
3.7 Conclusion 98<br />
Chapter IV<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g for a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
4.1 Introduction 100<br />
4.2 Problems <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>Supply</strong><strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> 102<br />
4.3 Hierarchical Model for Plann<strong>in</strong>g 109<br />
4.4 Plann<strong>in</strong>g Demand 117<br />
1
4.5 L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g for Selection of Crude Oil 123<br />
4.6 Ship Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Model 126<br />
4.7 Internal Logistics Plann<strong>in</strong>g 135<br />
4.8 Outbound Logistic Plann<strong>in</strong>g 139<br />
4.9 Conclusion 141<br />
Chapter V<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>and Information Technology<br />
5.1 Introduction 143<br />
5.2 Problem and objective 144<br />
5.3 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Components 144<br />
5.4 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Efficiency Improvement Us<strong>in</strong>g Information<br />
Technology 160<br />
5.5 Application of SCM Software <strong>in</strong> a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery 173<br />
5.6 Conclusion 187<br />
Chapter VI<br />
Strategic and Operational SCM Problems and Some Solution for a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
6.1 Introduction 189<br />
6.2 Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>Management</strong> of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> KRL 189<br />
6.3 Logistics Operations <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> of KRL 198<br />
6.4 Conclusion 248<br />
Chapter VII<br />
Summary, Conclusion, and SCope for Further Work<br />
7.1 Introduction 251<br />
7.2 Summary 251<br />
7.3 Limitations of the Work 257<br />
7.4 Conclusions of the Study 258<br />
7.5 Scope for Further Work 259<br />
Reference 260<br />
Listof Publications 278<br />
11
List of Figures<br />
Figure 1.1 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Integration 2<br />
Figure 1.2 Three important flows <strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong> 11<br />
Figure 3.1 World Crude oil <strong>Supply</strong> 41<br />
Figure 3.2 Comparison of capacity & throughput 47<br />
Figure 3.3 Capacity utilization (percentage) 47<br />
Figure 3.4 Comparison of crude and product export 48<br />
Figure 3.5 World Consumption of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products 48<br />
Rgure 3.6 Consumption of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products comparison 50<br />
Figure 3.7 Number of ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the world 54<br />
Figure 3.8 World map on ref<strong>in</strong>eries 54<br />
Figure 3.9 Demand <strong>Supply</strong> Balance 61<br />
Figure 3.10 <strong>Indian</strong> petroleum map 68<br />
Figure 3.11 Internal Logistics costs <strong>in</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>ery 69<br />
Figure 3.12 Logistics Costs Vs capacity 69<br />
Figure 3.13 Model for Location Selection 72<br />
Figure 3.14 Relationship diagram 80<br />
Figure 3.15 Components of logistic flexibility for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery 81<br />
Figure 4.1 Production system (simplified) 101<br />
Figure 4.2 Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g strategy 109<br />
Rgure 4.3 Hierarchical model for plann<strong>in</strong>g 112<br />
Rgure 4.4 Flow chart of plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure 128<br />
Figure 4.5 Number of Crude oil tankers arrival 129<br />
Figure 4.6 Demurrages paid <strong>in</strong> an year 129<br />
Figure 4.8 Flow chart show<strong>in</strong>g logic used <strong>in</strong> ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g optimization model 132<br />
Figure 4.9 Transport<strong>in</strong>g cost 134<br />
Figure 4.10 Storage tank allocation decision 136<br />
Figure 4.12 Blend<strong>in</strong>g decision mak<strong>in</strong>g model 139<br />
Figure 5.1 <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> components 145<br />
Figure 5.2 Effect of sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> logistic on profit compared to output improvement 146<br />
Figure 5.3 The value cha<strong>in</strong> 146<br />
Figure 5.4 Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Competitive advantage through supply cha<strong>in</strong> 148<br />
Figure 5.5 Information flow with<strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery 151<br />
Figure 5.7 Information flow for plann<strong>in</strong>g 155<br />
Figure 5.8 Control system 155<br />
Figure 5.9 Ledger report<strong>in</strong>g system 156<br />
Figure 5.10 Three way bill match<strong>in</strong>g procedure 158<br />
Figure 5.11 Two-way bill match<strong>in</strong>g 159<br />
111
Figure 5.12 Priority of Applications<br />
Figure 5.13 IT Functionality of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Figure 5.14 Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g design of logistics <strong>in</strong>formation system<br />
Figure 5.15 Aggregate Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Figure 5.16 Ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />
Figure 5.17 Ship selection procedure<br />
Figure 5.18 Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Operation Models<br />
Figure 5.19 Information flow model for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Figure 5.10 High level <strong>in</strong>formation model<br />
Figure 6.1 Product portfolio of the market<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />
Figure 6.2 Comparison of quantities of different products sold the OMC<br />
Figure 6.3 <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery limited<br />
Figure 6.4 Monthly crude arrivals<br />
Figure 6.5 Number of tankers received<br />
Figure 6.6 lime for berth<strong>in</strong>g to commence discharge<br />
Figure 6.7 Average Crude Parcel<br />
Figure 6.8 Change <strong>in</strong> cost with number of ships<br />
Figure 6.9 Demurrage paid by KRL<br />
Figure 6.10 Monthly crude arrival<br />
Figure 6.11 Crude consumption<br />
Figure 6.12 Crude stock <strong>in</strong> each month<br />
Figure 6.13 <strong>Supply</strong> consumption gap<br />
Figure 6.14 MS Production and sales<br />
Figure 6.15 Monthly SKO production and sales<br />
Figure 6.16 Monthly production and Sales<br />
Figure 6.17 Naphtha production and sales<br />
Figure 6.18 ATF Production and sales<br />
Figure 6.19 JP-5 Production and sales<br />
Figure 6.20 LDO production and sales<br />
Figure 6.21 LSHS Production and sales<br />
Figure 6.22 Fa Production and Sales<br />
Figure 6.23 BITUMEN production and sales<br />
Rgure 6.24 Tanker transfer of each product<br />
Figure 6.25 Despatch of products us<strong>in</strong>g wagons<br />
Figure 6.26 Despatch of products by road ."<br />
Figure 6.27 Truck Arrivals<br />
Figure 6.28 Truck Departure<br />
Figure 6.29 Inter-arrival time<br />
Figure 6.30 Inter-departure time<br />
IV<br />
161<br />
164<br />
174<br />
175<br />
175<br />
176<br />
178<br />
179<br />
185<br />
195<br />
195<br />
200<br />
207<br />
207<br />
208<br />
217<br />
219<br />
220<br />
222<br />
222<br />
222<br />
223<br />
225<br />
225<br />
225<br />
226<br />
226<br />
227<br />
227<br />
228<br />
228<br />
229<br />
232<br />
235<br />
237<br />
241<br />
241<br />
241<br />
241
Figure 6.31 Time Vs Inter-arrival time<br />
Figure 6.32 Time Vs Inter-departure time<br />
Figure 6.33 Truck load<strong>in</strong>g time<br />
Figure 6.34 Truck load<strong>in</strong>g time<br />
Figure 6.35 Hourlytruck load<strong>in</strong>g time<br />
Figure 6.36 Transferof product through pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Figure 6.37 Total pipel<strong>in</strong>e transfer<br />
Figure 6.38 Quantity transferred through each mode<br />
List of Tables<br />
242<br />
242<br />
242<br />
242<br />
243<br />
246<br />
247<br />
248<br />
Table 1.1 A Classification of Logistics Related Managerial Decision Problems 4<br />
Table 3.1 World proven crude oil reserves by region, 1996-2001 (m. b.) 40<br />
Table 3.2 World output of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products by region, 1996-2001(1000b/d) 41<br />
Table 3.3 World exports of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products by region, 1996-2001(1000b/d) 47<br />
Table 3.4 World Crude oil exports by region, 1996-2001(1000b/d) 48<br />
Table 3.5 OPEC Members crude oil exports by dest<strong>in</strong>ation, 1997-2001(1000b/d) 49<br />
Table 3.6 Largest International traders <strong>in</strong> Crude and <strong>Petroleum</strong> products 49<br />
Table 3.7 World Consumption of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products by region, 1996-2001(1000b/d) 50<br />
Table 3.8 World ref<strong>in</strong>ery capacity by region, 1996 - 2001 (1000 b/d) 53<br />
Table 3.9 Global ref<strong>in</strong>eries 54<br />
Table 3.10 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> Asia Pacific (OOObb/d) 55<br />
Table 3.11 Self Reliance of <strong>Petroleum</strong> Products 60<br />
Table 3.12 Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India 64<br />
Table 3.13 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity utilization <strong>in</strong> India 65<br />
Table 3.14 Private Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India 67<br />
Table 3.15 Cost comparison us<strong>in</strong>g Spreadsheet 73<br />
Table 3.16 Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for factor selection 75<br />
Table 3.17 Selected factors 75<br />
Table 3.18 Relative Scor<strong>in</strong>g Procedure 76<br />
Table 3.19 Preference Matrixes 78<br />
Table 3.20 Weighted Score 79<br />
Table 3.21 Oil and condensate <strong>in</strong> billion barrel 82<br />
Table 3.22 Classification of ships 83<br />
Table 3.23 Crude oil properties at different locations 84<br />
Table 3.24 Flexibility areas and their impacts 89<br />
Table 3.25 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery up gradation options 93<br />
Table 3.26 Optimum processes configuration <strong>in</strong> India. 95<br />
v
Table 4.1 Matrix of logistics problems 104<br />
Table 4.2 Modes of product movement 108<br />
Table 4.3 Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g 115<br />
Table 4.4 Roll<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g 116<br />
Table 4.5 Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g 117<br />
Table 4.6 Consumption of products 120<br />
Table 4.7 Comparison of forecasts us<strong>in</strong>g different tools 120<br />
Table 4.8 Description of events <strong>in</strong> event graph of the simulation model 131<br />
Table 4.9 Relationship between ship hire cost per ton 133<br />
Table 4.10 Calculation cost <strong>in</strong> truck transport 140<br />
Table 4.11 DSS for transport model selection 140<br />
Table 5.1 Data generated at each department along with their ma<strong>in</strong> process. 181<br />
Table 6.1 Project implementation <strong>in</strong> KRL 191<br />
Table 6.2 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Marg<strong>in</strong>s 192<br />
Table 6.3 Details of Berths available at Kochi fort for oil handl<strong>in</strong>g 206<br />
Table 6.4 Analysis show<strong>in</strong>g the crude handl<strong>in</strong>g bottleneck at Kochi port 206<br />
Table 6.5 Ships and their details 215<br />
Table 6.6 Performance of tankers that brought KRL crude <strong>in</strong> 1998-99 216<br />
Table 6.7 Number of ships per month 220<br />
Table 6.8 Gross tankage requirement for controlled products <strong>in</strong> Million Tons 230<br />
Table 6.9 Gross tankage requirement for de-controlled products 230<br />
VI
Abbreviations used <strong>in</strong> this thesis<br />
APM Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism<br />
ATF Aviation Turb<strong>in</strong>e Fuel<br />
BH Bombay high<br />
BPC Bharat <strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Ltd.,<br />
BRPL Bongaigaon Ref<strong>in</strong>eries and Petrochemicals Ltd.,<br />
CAGR Compounded Average Growth Rate<br />
COT Coch<strong>in</strong> Oil Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
CPCL Chennai <strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Limited<br />
CRL Coch<strong>in</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Ltd.,<br />
DMT Dimethyl Terephthalate<br />
DRP Distribution resource plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
DRP Distribution Resources Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
DSS Decision Support System<br />
EDI Electronic data Interchange<br />
ETA Energy Information Adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />
ERP Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ETG Expert Technical Group<br />
GAlL Gas Authority of India Ltd.,<br />
GDP Gross Domestic product<br />
GIS Geographical <strong>in</strong>formation Systems<br />
Gal Government of India<br />
HPC H<strong>in</strong>dustan <strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Ltd.,<br />
IBP Indo Burmah <strong>Petroleum</strong> Company<br />
IOC <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation Ltd.,<br />
IOC <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation Limited<br />
JIT Just - <strong>in</strong> - time<br />
KRL Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited<br />
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas<br />
LPG Liquefied <strong>Petroleum</strong> Gas<br />
vii
LS<br />
MIS<br />
MMT<br />
MMTPA <br />
MoP&NG<br />
MRL<br />
MRP<br />
MRP-II <br />
MRPL<br />
NRL<br />
OCC<br />
OEB<br />
OECD<br />
OIL<br />
ONGC<br />
OPA<br />
OPEC<br />
SPM<br />
TPS<br />
VLCC<br />
wro<br />
Lowsulfur<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Information System<br />
Million Metric Tons<br />
Million tons per annum<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of Oil <strong>Petroleum</strong> and Natural Gas<br />
Madras Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Ltd.,<br />
Elaborate material requirement plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g resources plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Mangalore Ref<strong>in</strong>eries and Petrochemicals Ltd.<br />
Numaligarh Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited<br />
Oil Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Committee<br />
Oil economic budget<br />
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development<br />
Oil India Ltd.,<br />
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.<br />
Oil pool account<br />
Organization of <strong>Petroleum</strong> Export<strong>in</strong>g Countries<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t moor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Transaction Process<strong>in</strong>g System<br />
Very Large Crude Carrier<br />
World Trade Organization<br />
VIII
1.1 Introduction<br />
CHAPTER I<br />
Introduction to the Study<br />
This thesis deals with the study of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> of petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>eries,<br />
more specifically, with the supply cha<strong>in</strong> activities such as sourc<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil, its<br />
shipp<strong>in</strong>g, storage, ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, product storage, blend<strong>in</strong>g, and f<strong>in</strong>ally dispatch of<br />
productsfrom the ref<strong>in</strong>ery for distribution, and sale.<br />
<strong>Petroleum</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is a material flow <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>dustry where supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> cost amounts to 40% of total ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and distribution cost. Un<strong>in</strong>terrupted<br />
flow of <strong>in</strong>puts and outputs <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g byproducts and wastes with m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
facilities are crucial to cost effective and efficient operation of capital <strong>in</strong>tensive,<br />
process oriented, tightly coupled system such as a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Mithcelson [1992] has<br />
discussed the importance of materials management <strong>in</strong> capital <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries. Raw materials and logistics are very important to ref<strong>in</strong>eries as the<br />
former constitutes a significant component of the total manufactur<strong>in</strong>g cost and<br />
the later seriously affects the output, productivity and profitability of the plant.<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management bottlenecks have long term as well as short term<br />
impacts on the economics of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In order to understand the implications<br />
ofsupplycha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> materials and energy <strong>in</strong>tensive ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the chang<strong>in</strong>g global<br />
scenario, it is essential to know the scope, coverage and importance of supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> general and supply cha<strong>in</strong> management <strong>in</strong> particular. <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />
management focuses on the technical organization of the flow of goods and<br />
services <strong>in</strong> the value cha<strong>in</strong>, from the supplier to the customer. Shell global<br />
solution have claimed that supply cha<strong>in</strong> management (SCM) has shown that<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g, feed stock selection and optimization of<br />
distribution, supply, and manufactur<strong>in</strong>g have positively impacted their bottom<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
SCM <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>in</strong> the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g activities of <strong>in</strong>bound logistics,<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal logistics, outbound logistics,service logistics, and reverse logistics of any<br />
1
<strong>in</strong>dustry. In the case of petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry, application of service and reverse<br />
logistics is very limited because these two activities are not that common.<br />
Inbound logistics deals with all the activities start<strong>in</strong>g from selection of crude oil<br />
to receiv<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil <strong>in</strong> the tanks at ref<strong>in</strong>ery tank farm. Internal logistics deals<br />
with all the operations start<strong>in</strong>g from crude oil tank to the pump<strong>in</strong>g of ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
products to the tanks for f<strong>in</strong>al products. Outbound logistics deals with the<br />
operations like selection of transport mode for distribution of products, mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
arrangements for delivery of products, and distribution of products through the<br />
selected mode of transport. Figure 1.1 shows stages of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration.<br />
1.2 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lambert and Stock [1993], logistics, a widely accepted term<br />
by today's professionals, had <strong>in</strong> the past a variety of names <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g physical<br />
distribution, supply cha<strong>in</strong> management and bus<strong>in</strong>ess logistics. The Council of<br />
Logistics <strong>Management</strong> def<strong>in</strong>es logistics as:<br />
"The process of plann<strong>in</strong>g, implement<strong>in</strong>g and controll<strong>in</strong>g the efficient,<br />
cost-effective flow and storage of raw materials, <strong>in</strong>-process <strong>in</strong>ventory, f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />
goods and related <strong>in</strong>formation from the po<strong>in</strong>t of orig<strong>in</strong> to the po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />
consumption for the purpose of conform<strong>in</strong>g to customer requirements"<br />
flows:<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the above def<strong>in</strong>ition logistics consists of the follow<strong>in</strong>g four<br />
Material Flow: Flow of materials from their sources through necessary<br />
processes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gtheir storage, retrieval and the delivery of f<strong>in</strong>ished products.<br />
Merchandise Flow: Flow'of f<strong>in</strong>ished goods from f<strong>in</strong>ished good's stores <strong>in</strong><br />
the distribution channels to the customers.<br />
Money Flow: Flow of money <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g advances from organizations to<br />
suppliers of raw materials, energy, services, etc. and <strong>in</strong>to organizations from the<br />
wholesalers, distributors, customers, etc.<br />
Information Flow: Flow of required <strong>in</strong>formation from and <strong>in</strong>to the<br />
organization through various communication channels <strong>in</strong> the logistics system.<br />
3
Table 1.1 A Classification of Logistics Related Managerial Decision Problems<br />
I<br />
Material Flow<br />
I Infrastructure<br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
Facility Location<br />
Materials<br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
Procurement<br />
Technology<br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
Equipment Selection<br />
People<br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
Organization<br />
Raw Material, Facility Design Transportation Systems and Design<br />
Work-<strong>in</strong>-process,<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ished Goods<br />
Improvement of<br />
Exist<strong>in</strong>g Facility<br />
Inventory Control<br />
Storage<br />
WIP<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ished Goods<br />
dispatch<br />
Procedures based<br />
on Technology<br />
Job Specifications<br />
Incentive Schemes<br />
Selection of Inventory Control Mode ofTransport Organization<br />
Merchandise supply I Distribution and Handl<strong>in</strong>g Design<br />
Flow distribution<br />
channels<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Equipment Selection<br />
Systems and<br />
Job Specifications<br />
Incentive Schemes<br />
Contract terms<br />
with members of<br />
supply I<br />
distribution<br />
channel<br />
Procedures<br />
Money Flow<br />
Selection of<br />
Banks and credit!<br />
payment<br />
arrangements<br />
modes<br />
Budget<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Account<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
cash flow<br />
management<br />
Equipment Selection<br />
Systems and<br />
Procedures based<br />
on Technology and<br />
recutatons<br />
Organization<br />
Design<br />
Job Specifications<br />
Incentive Schemes<br />
Selection of How often who will In this case it acts Organization<br />
Information Flow modes of communicate what through Design<br />
communication <strong>in</strong>formation to <strong>in</strong>frastructure and Job Specifications<br />
Design oflogistic whom for tak<strong>in</strong>g systems Incentive Schemes<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation<br />
system<br />
what decisions?<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>in</strong>terruptions <strong>in</strong> any of the above four flows affect an organization's<br />
raw materials supply (purchas<strong>in</strong>g), manufactur<strong>in</strong>g (operations) and market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(distribution) functions. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Fawcett and Fawcett [1995], there exists a<br />
need to <strong>in</strong>tegrate these flows through effective management of <strong>in</strong>frastructure,<br />
materials, technology and people. The typical managerial decision problem that<br />
one encounters <strong>in</strong> real life while deal<strong>in</strong>g with the management of above four flows<br />
of the logistics system is summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 1.1. In this thesis, the concern is<br />
with the supply cha<strong>in</strong> management of an oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery. More specifically, it is<br />
concerned with the decisions on <strong>in</strong>frastructure facilities and transportation of<br />
crude oil to the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, and the movement of f<strong>in</strong>ished products out of the<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
4
1.3 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Practices<br />
In India approximately 13 percent of the GDP is spent on logistics<br />
(Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission report-zooz), whereas this Figure is only 10 percent for<br />
developed countries. <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management and logistics are still <strong>in</strong> the<br />
embryonic stage <strong>in</strong> India. The current lull <strong>in</strong> the economy is forc<strong>in</strong>g many<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries to exam<strong>in</strong>e their costs, and cut it down <strong>in</strong> size. Today excellent logistics<br />
management has become essential for success of companies. Logistics function<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes the total flow of material, from the acquisition of raw materials to<br />
delivery of f<strong>in</strong>ished products to the ultimate users. As such, it <strong>in</strong>cludes the<br />
activities of sourc<strong>in</strong>g and purchas<strong>in</strong>g, conversion <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g capacity plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
technology selection, operations management, production schedul<strong>in</strong>g, materials<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g, distribution plann<strong>in</strong>g and management of <strong>in</strong>dustry warehouse<br />
operations, <strong>in</strong>ventory management, <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound<br />
transportation; l<strong>in</strong>kage with customer service, sales, reverse logistics, promotion<br />
and market<strong>in</strong>g activities.<br />
Successful supply cha<strong>in</strong> management is extremely complex because of<br />
large number of players with vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest or objectives are <strong>in</strong>volved. Though<br />
the supply cha<strong>in</strong> of each company has its own unique features, the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples help <strong>in</strong> management of supply cha<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
• Beg<strong>in</strong>with the customer<br />
• Manage logistic assets<br />
• Organize customer management<br />
• Integrate sales and operations plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Leverage manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and sourc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Focus on strategic alliances and relationship management<br />
• Developcustomer driven performance measures<br />
A significant new trend has been evolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> logistics management <strong>in</strong> the<br />
last decade - one that <strong>in</strong>volves the collaboration of all participants <strong>in</strong> the supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> order to reduce the cost of total logistics system. It has been referred to<br />
as "<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>", "Logistics Partnership" or "Inter-Corporate<br />
5
Logistics <strong>Management</strong>". In traditional Logistics "total cost concepts" model,<br />
companies worked to manage logistics as an entity and to lower the total logistics<br />
costs to the organization. The model evolved balanc<strong>in</strong>g trade-off among<br />
production run lengths, <strong>in</strong>ventory, transportation, and warehous<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
customer service. Later an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of companies realized that though<br />
the total cost concepts might be useful, it is ta<strong>in</strong>ted because it does not consider<br />
the efficiency of the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong>. The supply cha<strong>in</strong> management on the<br />
other hand <strong>in</strong>volves the active collaboration of two or more participants <strong>in</strong> the<br />
supply channel (Supplier, manufacturer, distributor, and/or customer) to<br />
manage all the logistics resources <strong>in</strong> the most efficient manner possible.<br />
The concept of "quick response" ga<strong>in</strong>ed broad favour as companies <strong>in</strong> all<br />
parts of supply cha<strong>in</strong> developed an appreciation of its potent benefits. Quick<br />
response <strong>in</strong>volves the <strong>in</strong>tegration of the supply cha<strong>in</strong>, effectivelyl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g retailers,<br />
suppliers (manufacturers/ distributors) and carriers <strong>in</strong> close communication and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. Key elements of quick response <strong>in</strong>cludes:<br />
• Po<strong>in</strong>t-of-usage data capture<br />
• Hem - level management<br />
• RapidCommunication<br />
• Partnerships<br />
• Discipl<strong>in</strong>e and commitment<br />
Effective quick - response systems' benefits <strong>in</strong>clude lower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventories<br />
by as much as 40 percent, improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>-stock availability significantly, cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
transaction and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative costs <strong>in</strong> to half, reduc<strong>in</strong>g replenishment lead to a<br />
third or less of their former levels, identify<strong>in</strong>g slow-sell<strong>in</strong>g items sooner, and<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g operat<strong>in</strong>g costs for all players <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management strategy <strong>in</strong>volves determ<strong>in</strong>ation of what<br />
performance criteria the logistics system must ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> - more specifically, the<br />
service levels and cost objectives the logistics system must meet. Because cost<br />
and service normally <strong>in</strong>volve a trade-off, a company must consciously consider<br />
that trade-off and determ<strong>in</strong>e the desired supply cha<strong>in</strong> performance. This process<br />
6
<strong>in</strong>volves consideration of the company's strategic objectives, its specific<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g strategy and customer service requirements and its competitors' cost<br />
service position.<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves the development and management of all<br />
logistics resources <strong>in</strong> order to atta<strong>in</strong> the desired cost-service performance<br />
consideration, it might <strong>in</strong>clude number and location of warehouses, type of<br />
warehouses, mode and carrier selection, <strong>in</strong>ventory position, <strong>in</strong>ventory levels,<br />
orderentry technologies and <strong>in</strong>formation system, and so forth.<br />
Opportunities for differentiation - based on operational, logistics, or<br />
customer services excellence - are more likely to be exploited. <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />
management tends to have a more visible and more important role <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Company. Investments <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> function or <strong>in</strong>frastructure are more<br />
likely to be approved.<br />
Just - <strong>in</strong> - time (JIT) Logistics: It is useful to classify JIT programs <strong>in</strong>to<br />
two categories, JIT production and JIT logistics. These programs typicallyfocus<br />
onthe reduction of set up funds for key operations, the reduction of lot size, and<br />
the enhancement of quality - all lead<strong>in</strong>g to lower work - <strong>in</strong> - progress <strong>in</strong>ventories.<br />
JIT logistics programs, on the other hand, apply JIT pr<strong>in</strong>ciples to the<br />
management of raw materials, <strong>in</strong>ventories and beyond supplies. For JIT logistics<br />
plans to work,four 'Pillars' must be <strong>in</strong> place. They are:<br />
• STable production schedules<br />
• Efficient Communication<br />
• Co-ord<strong>in</strong>atedtransportation<br />
• Quality control<br />
suppliers.<br />
These four pr<strong>in</strong>ciples are critical to the <strong>in</strong>tegrated management of<br />
The 1990S have been called the "decade of customer service". All <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
sectors are plac<strong>in</strong>g a premium on quality, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g quality customer service.<br />
Serv<strong>in</strong>g customers as they want to be served and "mak<strong>in</strong>g company easy to do<br />
7
us<strong>in</strong>ess with" is competitive objective for the next millennium. At the same time<br />
the mean<strong>in</strong>g of effective customer service is chang<strong>in</strong>g, and companies must meet<br />
an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly higher standard. Customer Service Pyramid is an effective<br />
framework for formulat<strong>in</strong>g a customer service strategy <strong>in</strong> a fluid market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environment.<br />
1.3.1 Logistics as a Process<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Prof. Bernard La Londe of Ohio State University[1998],<br />
logistics is not a focused functional activity but one that enables the <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />
activities across functions. An effective way to promote this expanded role for<br />
logistics is to position logistics as a process, not as an activity or function. These<br />
are three important sub-processes as part of the logistic process. They are:<br />
• Integrated Production and distribution strategy development<br />
• The replenishment process<br />
• The order management process<br />
A well-designed forecast<strong>in</strong>g system can contribute significantly to logistic<br />
performance. Many consumer products companies are try<strong>in</strong>g to operate with a<br />
25 to 60 per cent forecast error (on the stock-keep<strong>in</strong>g unit level) <strong>in</strong> their one<br />
month- out forecasts. This error range wreaks havoc with <strong>in</strong>ventory levels and<br />
customer service performance. "Best Practice" companies, on the other hand,<br />
consistentlyare able to achieve 15 to 20 percent forecast error rates. Companies<br />
that perform poorly <strong>in</strong> their forecast<strong>in</strong>g typically commit two or more of the "Six<br />
offorecast<strong>in</strong>g" given below:<br />
• Lett<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ances drive forecasts<br />
• Hav<strong>in</strong>gno forecast "owner"<br />
• Hav<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>sufficient analytical support<br />
• Us<strong>in</strong>ga s<strong>in</strong>gle forecast<strong>in</strong>g approach for every th<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Hav<strong>in</strong>g no sales and operations plann<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Fail<strong>in</strong>gto track forecast error.<br />
8
Many companies are discover<strong>in</strong>g that distribution resource plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(DRP) systems can reduce costs, improve customer service, and better their<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory management. DRP systems provide a full view <strong>in</strong>to the warehouse<br />
network by first exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g demand at the end of the channel and accumulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
requirements back through the warehouse network. This approach allows for full<br />
visibility of needs and better management of <strong>in</strong>ventories. DRP <strong>in</strong>volves both<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory management and distribution plann<strong>in</strong>g. A module of distribution<br />
requirement plann<strong>in</strong>g (DRP) extends the concepts of materials requirements<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> to a multi-echelon-warehouse <strong>in</strong>ventory environment. The results are<br />
time-phased replenishment schedules for mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventories across the<br />
warehous<strong>in</strong>g network. DRP offers an accurate simulation of distribution<br />
operations with extended plann<strong>in</strong>g visibility, allow<strong>in</strong>g logistics departments to<br />
manage all resources better.<br />
1.4 Literature on Importance of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
The last decade of this century has seen many significant changes. The<br />
important ones are: the end of cold war, break<strong>in</strong>g up of the former USSR,<br />
formation of trade blocks (EU, ASEAN, NAFfA, etc.), emergence of World Trade<br />
Organization, and globalization of World Economy. Feasibility of global soure<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and market<strong>in</strong>g of quality products and services at competitive prices <strong>in</strong> the world<br />
market have called for serious re-look <strong>in</strong>to the logistics functions <strong>in</strong> such<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries as steel, cement, fertilizer, chemicals, petroleum, etc., where logistics<br />
cost forms a significant component of the cost of goods sold. Gyula et. al.[1994]<br />
and Scully and Fawcett[1993] givesdetails on global manufactur<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Based on a survey of 1000 major European companies, KearneY[199S]<br />
observes that logistics function is becom<strong>in</strong>g more demand<strong>in</strong>g and complex as the<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment itself is becom<strong>in</strong>g complex and demand<strong>in</strong>g. The critical<br />
factors responsible for demand<strong>in</strong>g logistics management are: (1) Escalat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
customer expectations and demand, (2) Cycle time compression, (3) Global<br />
soure<strong>in</strong>g, (4) Global market, (5) Corporate restructur<strong>in</strong>g, (6) <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />
partnership, (7) Productivity pressures and (8) Environment awareness. In-spite<br />
of the above challenges, revolutions <strong>in</strong> communication and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
9
+- INFORMATION FLOW ....<br />
+- ....::MONEYFLOW<br />
MATERIAL FLOW.... ---+<br />
Raw material<br />
Production<br />
Raw Material<br />
Storage<br />
Figure 1.2 Three important flows <strong>in</strong> asupply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
Production Distribution Customer<br />
Uses<br />
Though supply cha<strong>in</strong>s have existence s<strong>in</strong>ce the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of civilization,<br />
thisname and associated approach to look<strong>in</strong>g at the issue is new. The focus so far<br />
<strong>in</strong> the area has been to look at different aspects of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> such as<br />
procurement, storage, production, distribution etc, separately and there are<br />
different specialists for each. An <strong>in</strong>tegrated view of the l<strong>in</strong>ks as parts of a supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> is of quite recent orig<strong>in</strong>. Therefore, when one changes the focus from<br />
different functional areas to the supply cha<strong>in</strong> concept, some fundamental issues<br />
arise that need to be addressed.<br />
The entities of the cha<strong>in</strong> or the departments of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> become<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant and try to form sub-goals and achieve them at the expense of the total<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> goal. Different entities <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> have different strength.<br />
This leads to a condition that the cha<strong>in</strong> is only as strong as the weakest l<strong>in</strong>k. The<br />
extra money spent <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g some areas of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> very strong is<br />
wasted because this extra strength does not <strong>in</strong> practice contribute to the<br />
operation of the total supply cha<strong>in</strong> significantly. In a cha<strong>in</strong> if two adjacent r<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
arenot connected the cha<strong>in</strong> is not one but two. The same is the case with the case<br />
ofa supplycha<strong>in</strong> where strong connections between adjacent l<strong>in</strong>ks are vital for its<br />
existence and function<strong>in</strong>g. These are called supply cha<strong>in</strong> disconnects. The<br />
presence of a loop or a cross-l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> creates multiple paths to<br />
choose from one end of the cha<strong>in</strong> to another. At each such loop or cross-l<strong>in</strong>k the<br />
conditions under which each path should be taken should be spelt out clearly.<br />
11
Loop<strong>in</strong>g and cross l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of supply cha<strong>in</strong>s create many <strong>in</strong>formation flow<br />
problems, <strong>in</strong>formation about the same th<strong>in</strong>g com<strong>in</strong>g from different l<strong>in</strong>ks might<br />
not be at agreement. It has been found that <strong>in</strong> most supply cha<strong>in</strong>s there are<br />
people to study and look at the <strong>in</strong>dividual departments, because of the<br />
organizational structure followed, but almost no one looks at the supply cha<strong>in</strong> as<br />
such<strong>in</strong> total. Itis the performance of this complete cha<strong>in</strong> that ultimately matters.<br />
1.6 This study and its objectives<br />
This study was started <strong>in</strong> September 1998, at the time of dismantl<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism (APM) <strong>in</strong> India. The objectives of this study are:<br />
1. Model development for selection of location for ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> India and<br />
identification of characteristics to be looked <strong>in</strong> to when configur<strong>in</strong>g it.<br />
2. To develop models for <strong>in</strong>tegrated supply cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
3. Overall design of a logistic <strong>in</strong>formation system for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
4. To make a detailed study of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> management <strong>in</strong> an <strong>Indian</strong><br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eryand make suggestions for improvement.<br />
1.7 Scheme of the Study<br />
This thesis is organized under seven chapters. In the second chapter<br />
presents a survey of literature relevant to the study. The third Chapter discusses<br />
world petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>Indian</strong> petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry along with the model to<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d out the location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery and the importance of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g flexibility<br />
<strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The fourth chapter deals with models for supply cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g for a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The fifth chapter is dedicated to the <strong>in</strong>formation flow <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound<br />
logistics, <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics, and external logistics. Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Ltd. and<br />
strategies for its long-term supply cha<strong>in</strong> improvement form the ground of the<br />
sixth chapter. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from the data collected and recommendations related<br />
to this area are presented <strong>in</strong> this chapter. In the last chapter presents the<br />
summaryof f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and recommendations, and discuss scope for further related<br />
work.<br />
12
2.1 Introduction<br />
CH A PT ER II<br />
Review ofLiterature<br />
In this chapter, a review of literature is carried out. Theoretical concepts <strong>in</strong><br />
the area of SCM are reviewed. SCM be<strong>in</strong>g a practice-dom<strong>in</strong>ated area, SCM<br />
practices <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, reported <strong>in</strong> the literature is reviewed. S<strong>in</strong>ce this work<br />
focuses on petroleum oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery, logisticsliterature <strong>in</strong> this area is also presented.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce supply cha<strong>in</strong> management is broad area, for clarity of presentation, we have<br />
divided the literature <strong>in</strong> to n<strong>in</strong>e section cover<strong>in</strong>g areas such as location, flexibility,<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g, etc. Application of Information Technology and its advantages are<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />
Theoretical literature is reviewed first to get a strong foundation on<br />
concepts. Application of those theories <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial environment is analyzed<br />
next. Industrial applications are divided <strong>in</strong> to service and manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector.<br />
Literature on manufactur<strong>in</strong>g is aga<strong>in</strong> sub-divided <strong>in</strong> to discrete and cont<strong>in</strong>uous.<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of petroleum products literature is reviewed towards the end <strong>in</strong> all the<br />
sections discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />
2.2 Concept of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management literature offers many variations on the same<br />
theme when def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a supply cha<strong>in</strong>. The most common def<strong>in</strong>itions [See for<br />
example, Jones and Riley [1984], Houlihan [1985], Stevens [1989], Scott and<br />
Westbook [1991], Lee and Bill<strong>in</strong>gton [1993], and Lamm<strong>in</strong>g [1996]] are a system<br />
of suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and customers where<br />
materials flow down stream from suppliers to customers and <strong>in</strong>formation flows<br />
to <strong>in</strong> both directions. Ma<strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of a supply cha<strong>in</strong> is from Stevens [1989]<br />
who def<strong>in</strong>es it as:<br />
"A connected series of activities which is concerned with plann<strong>in</strong>g, eo<br />
coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g, and controll<strong>in</strong>g material, parts, and f<strong>in</strong>ished goods from supplier to<br />
13
customer. It is concerned with two dist<strong>in</strong>ct flows (material and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
through the organization)"<br />
Oliverand Webber [1192] state that the supply cha<strong>in</strong> should be viewed as a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle entity that is "guided by strategic decision mak<strong>in</strong>g". Gentry [1996]<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded the carriers <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. O'Brien and Head [1995] <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
governments as part of the cha<strong>in</strong>. Manag<strong>in</strong>g the supply cha<strong>in</strong> would <strong>in</strong>clude all<br />
the issues associated with the government regulations and customs. Towill [1997]<br />
argues that the def<strong>in</strong>ition needs to be flexible. Houlihanliobg] is credited with<br />
co<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the term supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Cooper, Ellram, Gardner, and Hanks [1997]<br />
suggest that the span of management control should be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the added<br />
value of any relationship to the firm. Houlihan [1985] makes it clear that the<br />
differentiat<strong>in</strong>g factor between the <strong>in</strong>tegrated logistics and supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
management is the strategic decision mak<strong>in</strong>g as part of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
management.<br />
2.3 Evolution of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
The literature suggests that SCM has its roots <strong>in</strong> the evolutionary path<br />
followed through materials management and physical distribution after the<br />
Second World War, functional logistics (different managers for each functions)<br />
and <strong>in</strong>tegrated logistics (one manager for all functions). Forrester [1958]justifies<br />
the first step beyond functional logistics by us<strong>in</strong>g a systems analysis approach.<br />
Bowersox [1969] discussed the evolution of <strong>in</strong>tegrated logistics. Theoretically<br />
development of SCM has different stages. Langley [1992] suggests four stages of<br />
development. (1) Cost control, (2) profit centers orientation recogniz<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
positive impact on sales, (3) view of supply cha<strong>in</strong> as key to product<br />
differentiation, and (4) as a pr<strong>in</strong>cipal strategic advantage. Masters and Pohlen<br />
[1994] describe the evolution of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> to three phases. (1) Functional<br />
<strong>Management</strong> [1960-1970]-functions such as purchas<strong>in</strong>g, shipp<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />
distribution, each managed separately. (2) Internal <strong>in</strong>tegration [1980s]- the<br />
management of such supply cha<strong>in</strong> functions of a s<strong>in</strong>gle facility is identified and<br />
becomes the responsibility of a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>dividual, and (3) external <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
[1990s]-the management of supply cha<strong>in</strong> functions throughout the cha<strong>in</strong>. La<br />
14
Londe [1994] describes the evolution of <strong>in</strong>tegrated supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> three phases.<br />
(1) Physicaldistribution - distribution of goods is all that needs to be managed by<br />
a logistics manager. (2) Internal l<strong>in</strong>kages-it is important for the logistics manager<br />
to control both <strong>in</strong>ternal supply functions and physical distribution. (3) External<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kages- logistics management requires co-operation <strong>in</strong> the management with<br />
upstream and down stream entitles <strong>in</strong> order to maximize the benefits of the total<br />
logistic system.<br />
Industrial application of supply cha<strong>in</strong> pioneered the concept of (1)<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated logistics that eventually came to be called SCM (Bowersox [1969],<br />
Slater [1976]), and (2) partnership lend<strong>in</strong>g and management [Slater [1976],<br />
Gentry [1996], and Walton [1996]]. Forrester [1958] predicated that the<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduction of computer and the adoption of many mathematical models and<br />
other optimization tools had a great impact upon the development on supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong>. In 1960'S, Bowersox [1969] notes that computers emerged from their<br />
<strong>in</strong>fancy and formed application <strong>in</strong> physical distribution. Slater [1976] argues that<br />
a total systems approach to the logistics channel will reduce total cost and<br />
considerably improve the overall quality of the operations. Fuller [1993] states<br />
"logistics has the potential to become the next govern<strong>in</strong>g element of strategy as<br />
an<strong>in</strong>ventive way of creat<strong>in</strong>g value for customers, an immediate source of sav<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
a discipl<strong>in</strong>e on market<strong>in</strong>g, and a critical extension of production flexibility".<br />
Materials<br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
[1960s]<br />
Distribution<br />
<strong>Management</strong><br />
[1970s]<br />
Logistics<br />
management<br />
[early 1980s]<br />
Integrated logistic<br />
management<br />
[late 1980s]<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />
management<br />
[1990s]<br />
In the last two decades, logistics slowly evolved <strong>in</strong> to SCM. Houlihan<br />
[1988], Copan<strong>in</strong>o and Rosefield [1992], Lee and Bill<strong>in</strong>gton [1993], Fuller [1993],<br />
Thomas and Griff<strong>in</strong> [1996], Gattorna [1998] and Mitra and chatterjee [2001]<br />
have tried to account for the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g awareness and implementation of SCM.<br />
To have maximum benefit, the supply cha<strong>in</strong> must be managed as a s<strong>in</strong>gle entity.<br />
15
Firms must avoid sub-optimization through self-<strong>in</strong>terest at any l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> the cha<strong>in</strong><br />
bymanag<strong>in</strong>g the entire cha<strong>in</strong> as a s<strong>in</strong>gle entity while simultaneously deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
the power relationship that are <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> the cha<strong>in</strong>s. Baganha and Cohen<br />
[1998] po<strong>in</strong>t out that application of the variability of demand <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
has been recognized and described. Bhaskaran [1996] notes that manufactures<br />
have recognized the need to optimize the performance of the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
connect<strong>in</strong>g raw material to the f<strong>in</strong>ished product. Gavirneni, Kapusc<strong>in</strong>ski, and<br />
Tayur [1998] note that the focus of manag<strong>in</strong>g the supply cha<strong>in</strong> has led to radical<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about supplier/customer relations.<br />
Stevens [1998] suggested that <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the cha<strong>in</strong> elements has to be<br />
done for the improvement <strong>in</strong> SCM performance. Stock and Lambert [1992]<br />
observed that to become a world-class company, a company must focus on<br />
logistic <strong>in</strong>tegration. Bowersox and Daugherty [1995] identified that logistic<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegration will be possible by the development <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation technology<br />
Cooper, et al. [1997] made it clear that SCM is not the <strong>in</strong>tegration of logistics<br />
alone, it is the total <strong>in</strong>tegration from vendor to customer. Kopicki [1999]<br />
identified that develop<strong>in</strong>g countries are <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> to compete <strong>in</strong><br />
the world-class market<strong>in</strong>g. Sahay [2001] suggests that manag<strong>in</strong>g supply cha<strong>in</strong> is<br />
the onlywayto meet the global challenges. Paul, et al. [1998] identify the changes<br />
<strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition, growth and approaches. It is noted that <strong>in</strong>tegration us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation technology and strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g are areas of focus now. Gilmour<br />
[1999] made some efforts to benchmark supply cha<strong>in</strong> operations. Bench mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />
SC operations is useful <strong>in</strong> performance improvement.<br />
From the above literature review it is clear that SCM focus <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery is a<br />
pert<strong>in</strong>ent research problem. It is also clear that an <strong>in</strong>tegrated supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
approach and use of <strong>in</strong>formation technology should be taken <strong>in</strong> SCM studies.<br />
2.4 Location for a New Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g the size and location of facilities are traditional problems. It has<br />
beenestablishedtheoretically the importance of location for <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> the SCM<br />
context. Weber [1922], Beckman [1968], and Drezner [1995] have addressed the<br />
problem by apply<strong>in</strong>g the methods of operations research. Hall [1987], and<br />
16
Daganzo [1996] have tried to solve the location of transportation term<strong>in</strong>als as an<br />
optimization problem. Compbell [1990] developed a cont<strong>in</strong>uous approximation<br />
modelfor relocat<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>als to serve expand<strong>in</strong>g demand. Noritake and Kimura<br />
[1990] developed models to be identified with the optimal size and location of a<br />
seaport us<strong>in</strong>g separable programm<strong>in</strong>g technique. Eichi Taniguehi et al. [1999]<br />
suggestsa mathematical model for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the optimal size and location of a<br />
logistics term<strong>in</strong>al. Ganeshan and Terry [2001] suggest that there are four<br />
decision areas <strong>in</strong> SCM (1) Location (2) Production (3) Inventory (4)<br />
Transportation. Ioannis et al. [2000] make an analysis on support<strong>in</strong>g decision<br />
makers <strong>in</strong> land use plann<strong>in</strong>g around chemical sites. M<strong>in</strong> and Melachr<strong>in</strong>oudis<br />
[1999] analyze the relocation problems of a distribution facility and Papazolon et<br />
al. [1999] discuss the risk <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> land use plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Kuehn, et al. [1963] have used a heuristic programme for locat<strong>in</strong>g a warehouse.<br />
Geoffro<strong>in</strong> & Arthur [1976] predict the scope of computer application <strong>in</strong> selection<br />
of location. Hamel, et al. [1985] po<strong>in</strong>t out the importance of location when a<br />
company is plann<strong>in</strong>g for global market<strong>in</strong>g. Khumawala, et al. [1971] made a<br />
comparison of some warehouse location techniques. Klassen, et al. [1994] have<br />
identified the barriers <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational operations. They have identified location<br />
of the plant as one of the major bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> global market<strong>in</strong>g. Fordows &<br />
Kasra [1997] suggest to f<strong>in</strong>d the location correctly for foreign companies.<br />
Agost<strong>in</strong>o Villa [2001] <strong>in</strong>troduces some SCM problems. Importance of location is<br />
stressed <strong>in</strong> this article. Mac Cormek, et al. [1994] note the new dynamics of<br />
Global manufactur<strong>in</strong>g site location. Porter [1990] suggests the competitive<br />
advantage of nations <strong>in</strong> the location selection especially for cont<strong>in</strong>uos<br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. Nation must be selected on the basis of target market. Lee &<br />
Larry [2002] note that the term globalization describes bus<strong>in</strong>ess deployment of<br />
facilities and operations around the world. Globalization results <strong>in</strong> more exports<br />
and imports. East Asia has become the fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g and foremost trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regions <strong>in</strong> the world. They have identified six groups of factors, which dom<strong>in</strong>ate<br />
location decisionfor a new plant. Location selection is a very vital decision, which<br />
haslong-term implication. This strategic decision is not easy to solve because (1)<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of future (2) complexity and conflict<strong>in</strong>g factors associated with the<br />
17
site selection problem, and (3) constra<strong>in</strong>ts and limitation of resources to produce<br />
site. Pair wise compassion of factors gives fairly good results for site selection.<br />
Literature shows that the location for ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be first selected on a<br />
global basis due to the global competition. When look<strong>in</strong>g on the global basis, it<br />
will come to a country to setup a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The selection of country can be solved<br />
as a non numeric problem. Selection of the country can be followed by state<br />
selection and location selection. This can be solved with composite method.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>al site selection can be made with the help of numerical solution. So the<br />
selection of locations for a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery is possible with the <strong>in</strong>tegration of both<br />
quantitative and qualitative techniques. Selection of site for production setup is<br />
complexwhen compared to the selection of location for a warehouse. Warehouse<br />
problems can be solved with operations research or techniques. But<br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g location selection can not be solved with the help of techniques<br />
alone. Composite techniques are ideal for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out suitable location for a<br />
process<strong>in</strong>dustry like ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
2.5 Flexibility of Resources<br />
Theoretically flexibility is more important for <strong>in</strong>dustry with cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
production. Lee and Larry [2002] say that manufactur<strong>in</strong>g process that can be<br />
changed easily to handle various products is flexibility. The ability to<br />
reprogramme process is useful for high customization. Nemetz and Fry [1998]<br />
describe the characteristics of a flexible manufactur<strong>in</strong>g organization. Eric and<br />
Amitabh [2002] discuss the sources of volume flexibility and their impact on<br />
performance. The <strong>in</strong>ventory will be m<strong>in</strong>imum if the organization can control the<br />
volume at sources itself. Cox Jt. [1989] suggests methods for measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
flexibility <strong>in</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. This method will give an idea how flexible is the<br />
organization. George [1994] and De Toni and Tonchia [1998] discuss the<br />
advantages of flexibility <strong>in</strong> production process and the organizations with<br />
flexibility <strong>in</strong> the competitive market environment. Fiegenbaum & Karnani [1991]<br />
studied the competitive advantage for an organization with flexibility <strong>in</strong> output.<br />
Product range can be maximum so it will satisfy more customers. Savoie [1998]<br />
describes flexibility as the last word on supply cha<strong>in</strong> improvement. He suggests<br />
18
that only flexibility can improve a well perform<strong>in</strong>g organization. Huchzermeier<br />
and Cohen [1998] prove that exchange rate value change risk can be m<strong>in</strong>imized<br />
by operational flexibility. This is more useful for organizations, which are<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the export market<strong>in</strong>g. Eric and Amitabh [2002] establish the drivers<br />
and sources of volume flexibility. They argue that short and long-term sources of<br />
volume flexibility have a positive, albeit differential impact on a firm's<br />
performance. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery has less resources flexibility because it is a process<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry. Identify<strong>in</strong>g flexibility resources will give performance ga<strong>in</strong> for a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery also.<br />
Flexibilityis needed for projects with long life. Short life projects need not<br />
have flexibility because the project will be completed before any significant<br />
change <strong>in</strong> technology occurs <strong>in</strong> market or resources. Projects with longer life are<br />
proneto undergo changes <strong>in</strong> all areas, so there must be provision for adoption of<br />
changes. Flexibility must be <strong>in</strong>corporated at the time of design and<br />
implementation itself. A process <strong>in</strong>dustry like ref<strong>in</strong>ery exists for quite a long<br />
period and a lot of changes will take place <strong>in</strong> the field of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. So a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
must identify the areas where they have to be flexible to rema<strong>in</strong> competitive <strong>in</strong><br />
the market.<br />
2.6 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g for all organizations <strong>in</strong>cludes both long term and short term to<br />
have better performance. Plann<strong>in</strong>g can be divided <strong>in</strong>to strategic and short term.<br />
Literature on both the types is sufficient to have good idea on plann<strong>in</strong>g. Kogut<br />
[1985] gives an idea how to design a global strategy to have a comparative and<br />
competitive value added cha<strong>in</strong>s. Tyndall [2000] discusses the global challenges<br />
<strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Lambert, et al. [1998] have discussed on the issues on<br />
implementation of SCM. Bnges [1998] & Evans, et al. [1995] suggest steps to<br />
avoid failures <strong>in</strong> SCM. Ganeshan & Terry [2001] and Beth [2000] suggest the<br />
importance of strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g. They also observed that if the marg<strong>in</strong>s are<br />
go<strong>in</strong>g down, look at the performance of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Bridleman, et al. [1997]<br />
note that the situation <strong>in</strong> process <strong>in</strong>dustry and make-to order <strong>in</strong>dustry are<br />
different. Scope for SCM is more <strong>in</strong> process <strong>in</strong>dustry such as petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
19
Eliram, et al. [1990] noticed that the relationship with shipper is important <strong>in</strong><br />
process <strong>in</strong>dustry. Partnership is the most efficient method <strong>in</strong> the third party<br />
logistics. Johnson, et al. [1995] observed that SCM is the best method to ga<strong>in</strong> an<br />
edge over the competitors. Inventory reduction and flexibility are the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
reasons. Lee, et al. [1992] discuss the problems and opportunities associated<br />
with supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory. He has developed a mathematical model for the<br />
reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory. Production, plann<strong>in</strong>g and control us<strong>in</strong>g fitter theory is<br />
done by Towill and Del Vecchio [1994] for supply cha<strong>in</strong> dynamics. The<br />
performance measurement procedure is developed by Beaman [1999]. As per<br />
Jones and Riley [1985] <strong>in</strong>ventory must be used for the competitive advantage<br />
through SCM. Lee and Bill<strong>in</strong>gton [1993] suggest that material management will<br />
becomplex <strong>in</strong> decentralized supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Mathematical model is also developed<br />
for the decentralized supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Lee and Bill<strong>in</strong>gton [1995] high lights the<br />
evolution of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management models and practices <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Bowersox [1997] observed that world class leaders <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry have better control<br />
over their supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Cav<strong>in</strong>ato [1999] developed a cost/value model for supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> competitiveness. Cooper and Eliram [1993], and La Londe [1997]<br />
identified characteristics of SCM and its implications on purchas<strong>in</strong>g and supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> strategy.<br />
2.6.1 Strategic Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The importance of long term purchas<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g is emphasized by Carter<br />
[1996]. Chan & Huff [1997] suggest that the strategy for purchas<strong>in</strong>g must be<br />
focused on customer requirement. Zahra and Cov<strong>in</strong> [1993] have suggested that<br />
purchase strategy must be <strong>in</strong> tune with the policy and performance of the<br />
organization. The importance of knowledge management for develop<strong>in</strong>g strategy<br />
for an organization is discussed by Morten [1999]. Procedure for check<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
performance of strategy is developed by Robert, et al. [2000]. Literature shows<br />
the development and importance of strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> process <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />
Peter and Richard [1976] give guidel<strong>in</strong>es for design<strong>in</strong>g strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
importance of control of production on the basis of strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
discussed by Burbidge [1984]. Jones and Riley [1985] suggest the use of raw<br />
material <strong>in</strong>ventory for the competitive advantage through SCM. They suggest<br />
20
that the long term plann<strong>in</strong>g will have a better control on the raw material<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory and they add procedures for systematic plann<strong>in</strong>g. Ball<strong>in</strong>t J<strong>in</strong> [1993]<br />
recommends method for optimiz<strong>in</strong>g the level of <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. A<br />
mathematical model was developed for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the solution. Mac Berth and<br />
Ferguson [1991] have identified the strategic aspects of SCM. They have<br />
suggested that hav<strong>in</strong>g a strategy for the purchase as well production and<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g will improve competitiveness. Porter [1996] clearly def<strong>in</strong>es strategy as<br />
the long term plann<strong>in</strong>g for an organization. The length of plan period must be<br />
divided depend<strong>in</strong>g on the nature of bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Andrew & Alexander [1997]<br />
suggest the precautions to be taken <strong>in</strong> strategy. Ifproper plann<strong>in</strong>g is not there for<br />
short period, then the strategy will fail. Hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g is important for<br />
the best performance of the organization, Pagh and Cooper [1998] discuss the<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> postponement and speculation management. They are suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that the f<strong>in</strong>al decision on the product must be delayed as much as possible to<br />
have better customer satisfaction. Tyndall, et al. [1998] suggest methods for<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the value through global operation. Miller [1998] suggested methods<br />
for mak<strong>in</strong>g strategy and structure. Fredric [1986] suggests methods for strategic<br />
decision for develop<strong>in</strong>g organization structure. He suggests the need for a<br />
designed <strong>in</strong>frastructure for the development of an organization with strategic<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g. Morash, et al. [1996] suggest that long term plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> logistics<br />
capabilities is essential for competitive advantage and success of the<br />
organization. Sahay, et al. [2001] also suggests that to meet global challenges<br />
long term plann<strong>in</strong>g is essential through out the cha<strong>in</strong>. Harwick and Tom [1997]<br />
thought on optimum decision mak<strong>in</strong>g for the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Optimum decision <strong>in</strong><br />
logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g is essential for the global competition. Porter [1980] developed<br />
a competitive strategy for analyz<strong>in</strong>g the performance of an <strong>in</strong>dustry. Oral and<br />
Dom<strong>in</strong>ique [1989] make an analytical approach to competitive strategy<br />
formulation for an <strong>in</strong>dustry. Young [1991] suggested that manufactur<strong>in</strong>g must be<br />
given moreimportance <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g strategy.<br />
Miller [1992] warned about the strategy trap. Keep<strong>in</strong>g the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />
top management is taken as the trap. Pelham& Plarris [1996] see the future for<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries lie <strong>in</strong> the strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g for operation and control. Chow, et al.<br />
21
[1995] developed a framework for logistics frame work. Integration of logistics<br />
with strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g is the objective. Theodure, et al. [1998] suggest that<br />
logistic strategy is at a cross road now. Integration must be considered for<br />
strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g. La Londe and Masters [1994] suggest that strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for logistics is the blue pr<strong>in</strong>t for success <strong>in</strong> the next century. Process <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
like ref<strong>in</strong>ery need long-term plann<strong>in</strong>g for the existence <strong>in</strong> the competitive global<br />
market. Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g is essential to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the correct sequence of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation flow for decision tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
2.6.2 Hierarchical Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Theoretically hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g is required for a process <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Some of the decisions must be strategic where as some other decisions must be<br />
daily. The plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure also must be different. Hans and Wolfgang [1992]<br />
suggest the importance of strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g. They are claim<strong>in</strong>g that to have<br />
competitive advantage an organization must plan for develop<strong>in</strong>g edge over<br />
others. Managers do short term plann<strong>in</strong>g. Importance of supply cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
model development is discussed by Fisher [1997]. He suggests that each <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
must have its own unique model. Raghuram [1999] suggests that there must be<br />
specially designed long term plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure for each organization. Focus<br />
required <strong>in</strong> purchase is discussed by Murray [1998]. Miller [2001] stresses the<br />
importance of hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> management. Hartveld<br />
[1996] discusses the hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g importance for a chemical <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Haulilan [1985] also suggests the importance of hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g importance<br />
for <strong>in</strong>ternational market<strong>in</strong>g. Bechtel [1993] gives the use process <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
model<strong>in</strong>g system for the efficiency improvement of plann<strong>in</strong>g department. P<strong>in</strong>to,<br />
et al. [2000] have developed a plann<strong>in</strong>g and schedul<strong>in</strong>g model for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Firstly, the development of a non-l<strong>in</strong>ear plann<strong>in</strong>g model for ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
production is presented. The model is able to represent a general ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
topology and allows the implementation of non-l<strong>in</strong>ear process models as well as<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g relations. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the market limitations for each oil derivative<br />
usually supplied by the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the optimization model is able to def<strong>in</strong>e new<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts, thus <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the production of more valuable products while<br />
22
satisfy<strong>in</strong>g all specification constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Real-world applications are developed for<br />
the plann<strong>in</strong>g of diesel production <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> Brazil. The second part of the<br />
work addresses schedul<strong>in</strong>g problem <strong>in</strong> oil ref<strong>in</strong>eries with mixed <strong>in</strong>teger<br />
optimization models and rely both cont<strong>in</strong>uous and discrete events<br />
representations. The paper also discusses the development and selection of<br />
optimization models for short-term schedul<strong>in</strong>g of a set of operations that<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes, product receiv<strong>in</strong>g from process units, storage and <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
management <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediate tanks, blend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to atta<strong>in</strong> oil specifications<br />
and demands, and transport sequenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> oil pipel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
2.7 Integration of Operations<br />
Optimization at different levels is common In all <strong>in</strong>dustries. In<br />
production a lot of researches have been tak<strong>in</strong>g place. Some literature is<br />
available on <strong>in</strong>bound logistics and more work has been carried out <strong>in</strong> outbound<br />
logistics. Stevens [1986] presents the importance of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
He suggests that total <strong>in</strong>tegration alone will improve the performance. Lambert,<br />
et al. [1979] notes the appraisal of the <strong>in</strong>tegrated physical distribution. Total<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegration is not covered <strong>in</strong> this paper but importance of physical distribution is<br />
discussed. Towill [1991] discusses the dynamics of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. In his paper the<br />
importance of <strong>in</strong>bound logistics is discussed. Stevens [1989] and Stevens, et al.<br />
[1989] suggest <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g from supplier to the end customer. Use of decision<br />
models are also discussed <strong>in</strong> this paper. Dieasli [1984] discusses the importance<br />
and application of functional <strong>in</strong>tegration. Back, et al. [1996] compared the<br />
performance and procedure of reeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g with SCM. Bell & Stukhast [1986]<br />
studied and identified the attributes of material management.<br />
Ross and David [1996] identify the ma<strong>in</strong> challenge of SCM for<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegration. Wu, et al. [1999] suggests the special issue of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
management <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegration of operations. Gattorana [1998] suggests that<br />
alignment of operations is the key activity for the success of SCM. Gattora, et al.<br />
[1991] observed that reduc<strong>in</strong>g complexity <strong>in</strong> the logistics operation is important<br />
for the effective implementation of SCM. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton [1995] suggested the<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegration procedure for plann<strong>in</strong>g, schedul<strong>in</strong>g, and control. Barney [1991]<br />
23
identified the importance of resource identification to have competitive<br />
advantage <strong>in</strong> the market. Bowersox [1997] states the importance of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the operations of an organization. Integration, to the customer side and supplier<br />
side is discussed. Amundson [1998] suggests the importance of theory driven<br />
researches <strong>in</strong> the field of SCM. In his paper it is noted that the application of<br />
research can be made only by <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the results. Patterson [1999] discusses<br />
decision<strong>in</strong>tegration between manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and market<strong>in</strong>g/sales and Scott, et al.<br />
[2002] compare that with orig<strong>in</strong>al performance to establish the benefits of<br />
decision <strong>in</strong>tegration. Lenz [1981] identified <strong>in</strong>tegration as one of the<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ants of organizational performance for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Stevens [1989] also<br />
suggested that <strong>in</strong>tegration is the only way for improvement of supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Narasimhan and Carter [1998] stress the importance of l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
organization with<strong>in</strong> material sourc<strong>in</strong>g strategies. Wisner and Stanley [1999]<br />
developed an <strong>in</strong>tegration model for <strong>in</strong>ternal relationships and activities<br />
associated with high level of purchas<strong>in</strong>g service quality. Narasimhan & Kim<br />
[2002] studied the effect of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration on the relationship between<br />
diversification and performance. Diversification is easy <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />
organization. The performance will be improved by <strong>in</strong>tegration Mohan, et al.<br />
[2000] suggest that E-commerce can be used for <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the customer and<br />
organization. Sahay, et al. [2001] suggest a framework for develop<strong>in</strong>g customer<br />
relationship. Eliram and Cooper [1990] make the po<strong>in</strong>t that develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
partnership with shipper will make the schedul<strong>in</strong>g and movement of materials<br />
more efficient. Lewis and Talalayevsky [1997] add the application of <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
of logistics operations us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology. Lewis, et al. [1997]<br />
suggested an <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach to reeng<strong>in</strong>eer material and supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
control <strong>in</strong> a process <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
2.8 Information Technology<br />
Operations of SCM are widespread. Supplier may be at one place,<br />
operations <strong>in</strong> another place, and market can be <strong>in</strong> the third place. For a company<br />
which is do<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>ternational market<strong>in</strong>g, the market will be at different cont<strong>in</strong>ents.<br />
So the <strong>in</strong>tegration of operation is really complex. Blois [1980] identified the need<br />
24
of <strong>in</strong>formation for orientation of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. The focus is on <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
from market. Balcer and Lipman [1984] suggest the need for technology<br />
adoption <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation gather<strong>in</strong>g. Bro<strong>in</strong>arezyk & Alba [1994] notice the role of<br />
collection of <strong>in</strong>formation from consumers for process plann<strong>in</strong>g. Deveport and<br />
Short [1990] identify the need for redesign<strong>in</strong>g the bus<strong>in</strong>ess process to make use<br />
of the development <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation technology. Jones and Clarke [1990] made<br />
the po<strong>in</strong>t that effectiveness of SCM can be made only through <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Bowersox and Daugherty [1995] suggest the importance of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
technology <strong>in</strong> logistics. Stress of the paper is <strong>in</strong>bound and outbound logistic<br />
operations. Petri [1996] suggests a life-cycle approach to automation and<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation management <strong>in</strong> a process <strong>in</strong>dustry. Importance of total <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation systems is established <strong>in</strong> the paper. Elizondo [1996]<br />
emphasizes on the importance of network<strong>in</strong>g firm's knowledge. He suggests that,<br />
the decision must be network based rather than <strong>in</strong>dividual based. Zipk<strong>in</strong> [1999]<br />
suggests to have a co-operative <strong>in</strong>ventory policy through the supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Feitz<strong>in</strong>ger & Leed [1997] report that <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> IT has resulted <strong>in</strong> the<br />
availability of more <strong>in</strong>formation on channel activities to decision makers. Stalk,<br />
et al. [1992] discusses how the distribution centers obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
replacement/delivery decisions. In article Forbes [1997] there are reports that<br />
the distributors can re-route shipments us<strong>in</strong>g IT. Fisher [1997] has identified a<br />
method to check the rightness of a company's supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Mo<strong>in</strong>zadeb &<br />
Aggarwal [1997] have developed an <strong>in</strong>formation based multi echelon <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
system with emergency orders. It also emphasizes the need for network<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
suppliers and customers. Whang [1998] shares his experience of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
shar<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage is fast movement of material. Bour<br />
Land, et al. [1996] suggest that timely <strong>in</strong>formation reduces <strong>in</strong>ventories. Chen<br />
[1998] saysthat the reorder po<strong>in</strong>t can be lowered by shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation. Lee &<br />
Whang [2002] notice the importance of <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g among partners.<br />
Aviv and Federgruen [1998] recommend the operational benefits of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
shar<strong>in</strong>g and vendor managed <strong>in</strong>ventory programmes. Evans, et al. [1993]<br />
assessed the impact of <strong>in</strong>formation system on the dynamics of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
25
performance and predicted that it will reduce the <strong>in</strong>ventory. L<strong>in</strong> & Shaw [1998]<br />
suggest methods for re-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g the order fulfillment process <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
network. Sr<strong>in</strong>ivasan, et al. [1995] identify that the <strong>in</strong>creased speed of data flow<br />
can be achieved us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology. Gust<strong>in</strong>, et al. [1995] suggested<br />
that the <strong>in</strong>tegration of logistic is achievable with the development <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
flow. Mason Joues and Towill [1998] note that time compression <strong>in</strong> the supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation management is the vital action required for benefit<strong>in</strong>g SCM<br />
performance.<br />
Many organizations have recently recognized that shar<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
with other members <strong>in</strong> their supply cha<strong>in</strong> can lead to significant reduction <strong>in</strong> the<br />
total cost. Gairneni [2002] suggets that <strong>in</strong>formation flow can be used for<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g fixed order<strong>in</strong>g cost. Cochan & Fisher [2002] note that <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
management will be efficient by <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g. Many recent papers study<br />
the direct effect of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g. This l<strong>in</strong>e of research<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes Cachon & Fisher [2000], Xiande, et al. [2002], Mehmet. et al. [2002].<br />
Decter [1997] identified the importance of data acquisition and team build<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />
that paper the importance of team is discussed for the development of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g. Thouemann [2002] identifies the improvement <strong>in</strong> supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> performance by shar<strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>in</strong>formation from the market. Kefeng, et<br />
al. [2001] suggest that <strong>in</strong>formation technology can better co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate the supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong>activities. Lode-Li [2002] writes on the importance of <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong> with horizontal competition.<br />
Literature shows that <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g use of Information Technology is the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> reason for the success of SCM. Application of <strong>in</strong>formation technology is<br />
<strong>in</strong>eviTable for any <strong>in</strong>dustry to implement SCM. Information shar<strong>in</strong>g is the<br />
essence of speed of material flow. Literature shows that the shar<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation must go up to the supplier. So that they can also plan their<br />
production and delivery of goods. A model for <strong>in</strong>formation flow is essential to<br />
have efficient function<strong>in</strong>g. Efficiency of the <strong>in</strong>formation flow depends on the<br />
selection oftechnologyand the appropriateness of <strong>in</strong>formation flow model used.<br />
26
2.9 Tools Used <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
SCM <strong>in</strong>tegration has to take place after optimiz<strong>in</strong>g all the elements of SCM<br />
operations. Optimization can be achieved only by the use of tools. Many tools<br />
are available <strong>in</strong> literature and a series of studies are tak<strong>in</strong>g place for develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
new tools. Mohauty & Desutch [2001] emphasize the application of Decision<br />
Support Systems (DSS), and L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g for the successful<br />
implementation of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management.<br />
2.9.1 Decision Support Systems (DSS)<br />
Cox and Adam [1980] developed a DSS for manufactur<strong>in</strong>g resource<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g. Important <strong>in</strong>formation required for the top management for plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is discussed. Vanttee & Wilbrands [1988] developed a DSSfor conta<strong>in</strong>er term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g. Suggestions are given for the utilization of term<strong>in</strong>als. Karacapilids and<br />
Pappis [1997] developed a framework for group DSS by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g artificial<br />
<strong>in</strong>telligence and operations research techniques. A general algorithm for<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g batch operations was developed by Koudili, et al. [1993]. Pasqale<br />
Leguto and R<strong>in</strong>a [2001] developed a DSS for berth plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a port for<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>er term<strong>in</strong>al. They have used discrete event simulation for develop<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
DSS. Yuss and Choi [1999] developed a simulation model for conta<strong>in</strong>er term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
operations. This model optimizes the wait<strong>in</strong>g time of conta<strong>in</strong>ers. A discrete<br />
event simulation is used for the development of DSS. Bhasi and Acharya [1997]<br />
developed a DSS for ship lighter<strong>in</strong>g operations. A discrete event simulation<br />
method is used <strong>in</strong> it. Ronex [1986] developed a ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g for short period.<br />
Ronex [1993] analyzed the ship operation <strong>in</strong> the decade.<br />
Simulation <strong>in</strong> earlier stages were done us<strong>in</strong>g programme written us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fortran or other general-purpose computer languages. Develop<strong>in</strong>g logic and<br />
cod<strong>in</strong>g was very complex and time consum<strong>in</strong>g and naturally the quality was also<br />
notvery good. Expertise was essential for do<strong>in</strong>g simulation. Packages like GPSS,<br />
SIMAN, SIMFACTORY, EXTEND, etc. came to help <strong>in</strong> the next stage.<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g simulation with package was much faster and simple. Still it could<br />
not be used as a general-purpose tool. The development of Object Oriented<br />
Languages made the use of simulation more popular. Speed of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
27
simulation programme reduced drastically because of splitt<strong>in</strong>g of operations to<br />
objects. F<strong>in</strong>ally the development of Agent Based Simulation made the use of<br />
simulation simpler. Agents are developed for do<strong>in</strong>g the simulation.<br />
2.9.2 Optimization Tools.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ear programm<strong>in</strong>g problems (LPP) are formulated and solved<br />
extensively for process <strong>in</strong>dustry operation. Garrod & Mikkirs [1985] developed<br />
an LPP for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out the optimal ship size for transportation of bulk materials.<br />
Ship size problem was attacked by many people. Some of them are by Janson<br />
and Shmerson [1982], Pope and Talley [1988] and Ronen [1983] who developed<br />
a ship-schedul<strong>in</strong>g model us<strong>in</strong>g LPP. Rub<strong>in</strong> & Wagner [1990] used LPP for fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the shadow prices as tool for managers. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton [1992] used non-l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
optimization for gasol<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g operation. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton & Shobrys [1996]<br />
suggest the application of optimization <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Lee, et al. [1996] used<br />
mixed <strong>in</strong>teger programm<strong>in</strong>g model for ref<strong>in</strong>ery short term schedul<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g. Mansfield, et al. [1993] used <strong>in</strong>teger programm<strong>in</strong>g for gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g optimization. Mora, et al. [1998] developed an optimization model for<br />
production of diesel us<strong>in</strong>g LP. Moro and P<strong>in</strong>to [1998] used mixed <strong>in</strong>teger model<br />
for short-term crude schedul<strong>in</strong>g. P<strong>in</strong>to and Grossmann [1994] used LP for<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g production for multi product plants. P<strong>in</strong>to and Grossmann [1998]<br />
used assignment and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g models for the schedul<strong>in</strong>g of chemical process<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry. Sal<strong>in</strong>idis and Grossman [1991] used MINLP model for multi product<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g. Rigby, et al. [1995] used LP for blend<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ery products. Slah<br />
[1996] developed LPP for crude oil schedul<strong>in</strong>g. He has listed the assumptions<br />
made for develop<strong>in</strong>g the LP. Symonds [1995] has suggested that LP has the<br />
maximum applications for solv<strong>in</strong>g the ref<strong>in</strong>ery problems. Xueya & Sargent<br />
[1996] developed LPP for optimal operation of mixed production facilities.<br />
Gurmani & Tang [199] developed an LPP for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out optimal order<strong>in</strong>g<br />
decisions with uncerta<strong>in</strong> cost and demand forecast updat<strong>in</strong>g. Ravi & Raddy<br />
[1998] developed an operation plann<strong>in</strong>g model for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery us<strong>in</strong>g fuzzy l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
fractional goal programm<strong>in</strong>g. Mand Gothe, et al. [2002] developed production<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g model us<strong>in</strong>g fuzzyl<strong>in</strong>ear fractional goal programm<strong>in</strong>g. Importance of<br />
security analysis is discussed by ward & Wendell [1990] and Jansen, et al. [1997].<br />
28
Jansen warns about the usage of changes. Ifnot carefully done, the variations <strong>in</strong><br />
results will not have any use. Variable selection must be <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with actual<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> the organization. Vehicle schedul<strong>in</strong>g problem was formulated and<br />
solved by Foster and Ryan [1976]. They have used <strong>in</strong>teger-programm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
approach. Li-Hs<strong>in</strong>g Shih [1997] used mixed <strong>in</strong>teger programm<strong>in</strong>g method for<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g coal imports. Efficiency of supply cha<strong>in</strong> vehicle schedul<strong>in</strong>g problem was<br />
formulated and solved by Foster & Ryan [1976]. They have used <strong>in</strong>teger<br />
programm<strong>in</strong>g approach.<br />
2.9.3 Demand Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Methods<br />
Demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g has history of long stand<strong>in</strong>g. All types of <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
needs demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g for the material flow as well cash flow control.<br />
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g demand for the products of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is a similar problem when<br />
compared with other <strong>in</strong>dustries. Li-Hs<strong>in</strong>g Slil [1997] used mixed <strong>in</strong>teger<br />
programm<strong>in</strong>g method for plann<strong>in</strong>g coal imports that has a bear<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />
correctness of demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Battachargee [1998] noticed the importance<br />
of demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g and claims that it is the major bottleneck <strong>in</strong> world class<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g. Laugly & Halcomb [1992] suggest that the customer value of the<br />
product decides the demand. Masscustomization is discussed <strong>in</strong> the paper.<br />
Mentzer [1993] identified the importance of outbound channel management for<br />
better demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g. M<strong>in</strong> & Mentzer [2000] emphasis the role of<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> performance. Marien [2000] identifies demand<br />
forecast<strong>in</strong>g as one of the major supply cha<strong>in</strong> enablers. Muller [1991] discusses on<br />
competitive advantage through customer satisfaction for SCM. Lee, et al. [1997]<br />
suggests that the distortion <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation as it passes up the supply cha<strong>in</strong> is the<br />
reason for bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> the demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Melters [1997] has<br />
quantified the bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. It is also mentioned that it can be<br />
reduced by proper data collection. Federgruen and Zipk<strong>in</strong> [1989] <strong>in</strong>troduced an<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory model, with limited production capacity. Lee, et al. [1997] studied the<br />
bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> and found that bullwhip effect is the most<br />
important limit<strong>in</strong>g factor <strong>in</strong> the performance of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Clen, et al. [2000]<br />
have quantified the bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong>. The impact on forecast<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
lead-time, and <strong>in</strong>formation are discussed <strong>in</strong> the paper.<br />
29
Models are established with the help of case studies. Case studies provide<br />
data for check<strong>in</strong>g the models developed. Eisenhurt [1989] did <strong>in</strong> the other way<br />
also. He was establish<strong>in</strong>g that theories could be build from case studies. Stuart,<br />
et al. [1998] make po<strong>in</strong>t that case studies leverage the understand<strong>in</strong>g. Meredith<br />
[1998] also suggested that theory with case study makes better understand<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
the theory. Thomas & Yunsook [2002] developed the structure of supply<br />
network. It was established with the case of Honda. They compared these cases<br />
to establish the importance of supply network [outbound logistics]. Lamm<strong>in</strong>g, et<br />
al. [2002] did an <strong>in</strong>itial classification of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> to, <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and<br />
outbound logistics. It was established <strong>in</strong> a case study.<br />
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g is the first major activity <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g. It <strong>in</strong>volves careful<br />
study of past data and present scenario. The ma<strong>in</strong> purpose of forecast<strong>in</strong>g is to<br />
estimate the occurrence, tim<strong>in</strong>g or magnitude of future event. If the required<br />
level of accuracy for the forecast is less, then prediction is on the basis of past<br />
data and experience. It is not based on any analysis. To know the future demand<br />
on the basis of the demand <strong>in</strong> the past, extrapolation method can be used. The<br />
demand is forecast on the basis of data collected <strong>in</strong> the past. Volume of data is<br />
depended on the policy of forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Morphological analysis can be done for<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out the consumption of petrol or diesel per head <strong>in</strong> a state or district.<br />
Literature shows that forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods must be used for demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Trend analysis is one of the commonly used methods for demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />
process <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
2.10 Conclusion<br />
Some of the major contributions to the exist<strong>in</strong>g vast literature <strong>in</strong> SCM are<br />
briefly reviewed. The literature survey was started with review of literature on<br />
concepts, def<strong>in</strong>ition and evolution of SCM. From the above literature survey it<br />
was seen that as time passed, researches have been widen<strong>in</strong>g the scope of SCM to<br />
the present status where it covers plann<strong>in</strong>g, coord<strong>in</strong>ation, controll<strong>in</strong>g, materials,<br />
parts, and f<strong>in</strong>ished goods from orig<strong>in</strong>al supplier to f<strong>in</strong>al customer focuss<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
material and <strong>in</strong>formation flows, guided by strategic decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
literature reviewbrought out the importance of study of <strong>in</strong>tegrated SCM us<strong>in</strong>g IT.<br />
30
The literature review on sub problem related to supply cha<strong>in</strong> such as location<br />
selection, operational flexibility, strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g, hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g has<br />
established their importance <strong>in</strong> the case of petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>ery SCM. The<br />
importance of <strong>in</strong>tegration of operations and use of <strong>in</strong>formation technology to do<br />
the same was also seen <strong>in</strong> literature. SCM <strong>in</strong>tegration has to take place by<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the optimum perform<strong>in</strong>g sub elements. Optimization and decision<br />
support systems tools used were reviewed. It was seen that mathematical<br />
programm<strong>in</strong>g tools are more popular <strong>in</strong> structured small size problems. Fussy<br />
logic methods are also popular; simulation models are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong><br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> systems. Demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods were reviewed and the<br />
problem caused by bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>s was found to be an important<br />
limit<strong>in</strong>g factor for forecast<strong>in</strong>g systems. Morphological analysis was seen to be<br />
another approach that could be used for product demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g for a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eryfor long term.<br />
It was seen that different aspects of SCM <strong>in</strong> general and certa<strong>in</strong> SCM<br />
functions of petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> particular have been studied by researchers. A<br />
vide verity of tools have been used to solve the problems. The studies focussed on<br />
optimiz<strong>in</strong>g sub processes of the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Integration of the complete supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> was not to be found. This presents opportunity for work on develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegratedsupply cha<strong>in</strong> for ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
31
3.1 Introduction<br />
CH APT ER III<br />
Model for Selection of<br />
New Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Location<br />
Crude oil, available <strong>in</strong> a few parts of the world, is be<strong>in</strong>g used all over the<br />
world. Production of crude oil depends on demand. Availability of crude is not<br />
unlimited; so many countries are tapp<strong>in</strong>g it carefully. This chapter discusses<br />
factors relat<strong>in</strong>g to availability of crude oil through out the world, its production,<br />
and consumption. Global petroleum logistics analysis is done us<strong>in</strong>g secondary<br />
data. <strong>Indian</strong> petroleum scenario is also analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g secondary data. India is<br />
still import<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed petroleum products. Hence sett<strong>in</strong>g up ref<strong>in</strong>eries may be an<br />
option <strong>in</strong> the near future to reduce or even to elim<strong>in</strong>ate import of ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
petroleum products and improve the potential for export of the same to<br />
neighbor<strong>in</strong>g countries (lOC corporate presentation 2003). A model is developed<br />
for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery anywhere <strong>in</strong> the world. This model is<br />
adopted to locate a ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> India. Likelocation, flexibility is also important <strong>in</strong><br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery logistics. Need for flexibility and areas of flexibility are also discussed <strong>in</strong><br />
detail here but no attempt is made to quantify the flexibility. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
configuration <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Indian</strong> context is also discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Similar<br />
analysis is done <strong>in</strong> the United States. So the developments <strong>in</strong> the US are taken as<br />
benchmark <strong>in</strong> this section. Initial portion is presented with basic activities <strong>in</strong> oil<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries. This will help <strong>in</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g a basic idea on the formation of crude oil,<br />
availability of crude oil, collection of crude oil, storage, trade practices,<br />
transportation through land and sea, and procedure of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. The ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
product related activities are also discussed <strong>in</strong> this section. Reports from Energy<br />
Information Adm<strong>in</strong>istration (EIA) are taken as the basic material for the oil<br />
market basicdescription presented <strong>in</strong> this section. This <strong>in</strong>formation is not used <strong>in</strong><br />
any of the model developed. Data presented is not taken for any calculations <strong>in</strong><br />
the models developed <strong>in</strong> the research, but is used to set understand<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
background <strong>in</strong> which our models can be appreciated better.<br />
32
3.2 Global <strong>Petroleum</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
Location of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is strongly dependent on the place of drill<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
crude oil, purchase procedure, mode of transport, and place of consumption. So<br />
this section also analyzes <strong>in</strong> detail, these aspects with respect to the world crude<br />
oil <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
3.2.1 Demand for Crude Oil<br />
This section reviews the uses of petroleum and the data sources connected<br />
to that. The energy produced by burn<strong>in</strong>g petroleum products may be used to<br />
propel a vehicle as gasol<strong>in</strong>e, jet fuel, or diesel fuel. The energy produced is also<br />
used to heat a build<strong>in</strong>g as heat<strong>in</strong>g oil or residual fuel oil. Electric energy can<br />
produced by sp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g a turb<strong>in</strong>e directly or by creat<strong>in</strong>g steam to sp<strong>in</strong> a turb<strong>in</strong>e<br />
with help of heat produced from petroleum products. Crude oil products are<br />
used as raw material (feedstock) to produce petrochemicals or products such as<br />
plastics, polyurethane, solvents, and many other <strong>in</strong>termediate and end-user<br />
goods. These products play vital role <strong>in</strong> the present day to day life. So the<br />
dependence on crude oil for energy is steadily <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
3.2.2 Global Oil Consumption<br />
Largest consumers of crude oil are the <strong>in</strong>dustrialized countries. Until 1998<br />
these were not the most important growth markets for some years. The countries<br />
ofthe Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) account<br />
for almost 2/3 of worldwide daily oil consumption. Oil demand <strong>in</strong> the OECD<br />
grew by around 11 percentages over the 1991-97 periods, while demand outside<br />
theOEeD (exclud<strong>in</strong>g the Former Soviet Union) grew by 35 percent. The collapse<br />
of the Russian economy led to a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> oil consumption of more than 50<br />
percent over the 1991-98 periods. This consumption has rega<strong>in</strong>ed almost to the<br />
same level<strong>in</strong> the next five year period.<br />
Economic condition of a country has direct bear<strong>in</strong>g on the consumption of<br />
crude oil. Developed economies use oil much more <strong>in</strong>tensively than the<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g economies. Canada and the United States stand almost alone with<br />
their high per capita consumption of oil. Oil consumption <strong>in</strong> the United States<br />
33
and Canada equals almost 3 gallons per day per capita. The difference <strong>in</strong> these<br />
countries is largely due to their transportation system. People <strong>in</strong> developed<br />
countries ma<strong>in</strong>ly depend on private vehicles to travel relatively long distances. Oil<br />
consumption <strong>in</strong> the rest of the OECD equals 1.4 gallons per day per capita.<br />
Outside the OECD, oil consumption is only 0.2 gallons per day per capita.<br />
Dependence of public transport is the ma<strong>in</strong> reason for lesser consumption of<br />
crudeoil <strong>in</strong> the under developed countries.<br />
In petroleum consumption North America is the first. In North America, it<br />
is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the United States. It is followed by Asia (with Japan the largest<br />
consumer). Europe is hold<strong>in</strong>g the third position (consumption is more evenly<br />
spread among the nations). The other regions followalmost the same pattern.<br />
3.2.3 Measur<strong>in</strong>g Oil Consumption<br />
Crude oil consumption can be measured to know the growth of each<br />
nation, region, and cont<strong>in</strong>ent. Measur<strong>in</strong>g oil consumption presents a dilemma for<br />
public and private analysts. The size and complexity of the market and the<br />
number of consumers and suppliers make data collection a daunt<strong>in</strong>g task. The<br />
EIA, like other governmental agencies and analysts, uses a variety of approaches<br />
to measure oil consumption.<br />
Consumer surveys can provide a good deal of <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to how people use<br />
oil, the characteristics of the fuel-burn<strong>in</strong>g equipment they use, and other factors<br />
that affect consumption. EIA has undertaken a variety of complex surveys to<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>e oil consumption, such as the Residential Energy Consumption Survey<br />
and the Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Energy Consumption Survey. These surveys are costly,<br />
time-consum<strong>in</strong>g, and have a long lag before publication. They are not practical<br />
alternatives for short-term data collection.<br />
Collect<strong>in</strong>g data from suppliers is a better option for estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
consumption on a rout<strong>in</strong>e basis. Here the depth of required <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />
critically affected by the frequency with which it must be reported. On an annual<br />
basis, for <strong>in</strong>stance, EIA collects and publishes detailed sales data such as its Sales<br />
of Fuel oil and Kerosene. It also reports the source for sector-by-sector<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on consumption of these fuels. Available on a State-by-State basis,<br />
34
the report's data also feed EIA's multifuel State Energy Data System (SEDS). On<br />
a monthly basis, EIA collects sales data for major products from ref<strong>in</strong>ers and<br />
from prime suppliers. Such data is published <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Petroleum</strong> Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Monthly (PMM). The prime supplier data, reflect<strong>in</strong>g first sales <strong>in</strong>to a State for<br />
local consumption, are published <strong>in</strong> the PMMon a State-by-State basis.<br />
As for other goods, EIA also rout<strong>in</strong>ely monitors the sources of supply of<br />
petroleum <strong>in</strong> order to estimate the amount of product delivered to the market.<br />
To make data collection manageable, it focuses on the 'primary supply' system.<br />
The primary system <strong>in</strong>volves ref<strong>in</strong>ers, importers, pipel<strong>in</strong>es, and mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
transporters of petroleum, large storage facilities, and storage facilities with<br />
access to waterborne deliveries or pipel<strong>in</strong>es. For most ref<strong>in</strong>ed petroleum<br />
products, the balance is:<br />
• Ref<strong>in</strong>ery production (output)<br />
• plus imports of the product<br />
• plus or m<strong>in</strong>us the change <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
• plus or m<strong>in</strong>us shipments from other domestic regions<br />
• m<strong>in</strong>us exports<br />
• equals Product Supplied<br />
<strong>Petroleum</strong> analysts equate 'Product Supplied' with consumption; there is a<br />
lag between petroleum delivered <strong>in</strong>to the market and petroleum actually<br />
consumed. The product may be stored <strong>in</strong> a tank belong<strong>in</strong>g to a wholesaler, a<br />
retailer, or a consumer before it is used. It is not possible to capture these and<br />
therefore can be surprised by short-term volume fluctuations as these tanks are<br />
unexpectedly filled or emptied. The methodology overstates demand when the<br />
product moves <strong>in</strong>to wholesaler or retailer storage and understates it dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
period when it is actually consumed. So the actual data may not be available for<br />
computation.<br />
3.2.4 <strong>Supply</strong> of Crude Oil<br />
Knowledge on the formation of crude oil, types of crude oil, drill<strong>in</strong>g<br />
procedures, place of availability, present practices <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry, etc will be<br />
added advantage <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g the decision on purchase of crude oil. So this section<br />
provides a detailed discussion on those details relat<strong>in</strong>g to crude oil.<br />
35
3.2.4.1 What is Oil and Where It Comes From?<br />
Formation of oil is a natural time consum<strong>in</strong>g process. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
most widely accepted theory, oil is composed of compressed hydrocarbons, and<br />
was formed millions of years ago <strong>in</strong> a process that began when aquatic plant and<br />
animal rema<strong>in</strong>s were covered by layers of sediment, particles of rock and<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral. Over millions of years of extreme pressure and high temperatures, these<br />
particles became the mix of liquid hydrocarbons that we now know as oil.<br />
Different mixes of plant and animal rema<strong>in</strong>s, as well as pressure, heat, and time,<br />
have caused hydrocarbons to appear today <strong>in</strong> a variety of forms: crude oilfliquid),<br />
natural gas (gas), and coal (solid). Even diamonds are a form of hydrocarbons.<br />
The word 'petroleum' comes from the Lat<strong>in</strong> words petra, or rock, and<br />
oleum, oil. Oil is found <strong>in</strong> reservoirs <strong>in</strong> sedimentary rock. T<strong>in</strong>y pores <strong>in</strong> the rock<br />
allowed the petroleum to seep <strong>in</strong>. These 'reservoir rocks' hold the oil like a<br />
sponge. It is conf<strong>in</strong>ed by other non-porous layers that form a 'trap'. The world<br />
consists of many regions with different geological features formed as the earth's<br />
crust shifted. Some of these regions have more and larger petroleum traps. In<br />
some reservoir rocks, the oil is more concentrated <strong>in</strong> pools, mak<strong>in</strong>g it easier to<br />
extract, while <strong>in</strong> other reservoirs it is diffused throughout the rock.<br />
Bothfavorable characteristics are visible <strong>in</strong> the regions of Middle East, the<br />
petroleum traps are large and numerous, and the reservoir rock holds the oil <strong>in</strong><br />
substantial pools. This region's dom<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong> world oil supply is the clear result.<br />
Other regions also have large oil deposits, even if the oil is more difficult to be<br />
identified and more expensive to produce. Geologists generally agree that crude<br />
oil was formed over millions of years from the rema<strong>in</strong>s of t<strong>in</strong>y aquatic plants and<br />
animals that lived <strong>in</strong> ancient seas. <strong>Petroleum</strong> owes its existence largely to one<br />
celled mar<strong>in</strong>e organisms. As these organisms died, they sank to the sea bed and<br />
buried with sand and mud. They formed an organic-rich layer that eventually<br />
turned to sedimentary rock. The process repeated itself, one layer cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />
another.<br />
36
There are three essentials <strong>in</strong> the creation of a crude oil field:<br />
First, a 'source rock' whose geologichistory allowed the formation of crude<br />
oil. This usually is f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed, rich <strong>in</strong> organic matter.<br />
Second, migration of the oil from the source rocks to a 'reservoir rock',<br />
usually a sandstone or limestone that is thick and porous enough to hold a sizable<br />
accumulation of oil. A reservoir rock that is only a few feet thick may be<br />
commercially producible if it's at a relatively shallow depth and near other fields.<br />
To warrant the cost of produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more challeng<strong>in</strong>g regions (the Arctic North<br />
Slope) the reservoir may have to be several hundred feet thick.<br />
Third, entrapment of these material <strong>in</strong> a region. The earth is constantly<br />
creat<strong>in</strong>g irregular geologic structures through both sudden and gradual<br />
movements - earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and erosion caused by w<strong>in</strong>d and<br />
water. Uplifted rock can result <strong>in</strong> domelike structures or arched folds called<br />
anticl<strong>in</strong>es. These often serve as receptacles for hydrocarbons. The probability of<br />
discover<strong>in</strong>g oil is the greatest when such structures are formed near a source<br />
rock. In addition, an overly<strong>in</strong>g, impermeable rock must be present to seal the<br />
migrat<strong>in</strong>g oil <strong>in</strong> the structure. The oldest oil-bear<strong>in</strong>g rocks date back to more than<br />
600 million years and the youngest is about 1 million. Most oil fields have been<br />
found <strong>in</strong> rocks between 10 million and 270 million years old.<br />
Critical factor <strong>in</strong> the creation of oil is subsurface temperature, which<br />
<strong>in</strong>creases with depth. <strong>Petroleum</strong> hydrocarbons are rarely formed at temperatures<br />
less than 150 degree Fahrenheit and generally are carbonized and destroyed at<br />
temperatures higher than 500 degrees. Most hydrocarbons are found at<br />
temperatures rang<strong>in</strong>g from 225 to 350 degrees. It is the particular crude oil's<br />
geologic history that is most important <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g its characteristics. Some<br />
crude oils from Louisiana and Nigeria are similar because both were formed <strong>in</strong><br />
similar mar<strong>in</strong>e deposits. In parts of the Far East, crude oil generally is waxy,<br />
black or brown,and low <strong>in</strong> sulfur. It is similar to crude oils found <strong>in</strong> central Africa<br />
because both were formed from non-mar<strong>in</strong>e sources. In the Middle East, crude<br />
oil is black but less waxy and higher <strong>in</strong> sulfur. Crude oil from Western Australia<br />
can be a light, honey-colored liquid, while that from the North Sea typically is a<br />
37
waxy, greenish-black liquid. Many k<strong>in</strong>ds of crude oils are found <strong>in</strong> the United<br />
States because there is great variety <strong>in</strong> the geologic history of its different regions.<br />
3.2.4.2 Drill<strong>in</strong>g for Oil<br />
Prospective site identification for crude oil production is a difficult task.<br />
Companies use a variety of techniques, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g core sampl<strong>in</strong>g and Seismic<br />
test<strong>in</strong>g . Core sampl<strong>in</strong>g is physically remov<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g a cross section of the<br />
rock. Seismic test<strong>in</strong>g is the return vibrations from a man-made shockwave are<br />
measured and calibrated. Advances <strong>in</strong> technology have made considerable<br />
improvements <strong>in</strong> seismic test<strong>in</strong>g. After these exploratory tests, companies must<br />
then drill to confirm the presence of oil or gas. A 'dry hole' is an unsuccessful<br />
well, one where the drill<strong>in</strong>g did not f<strong>in</strong>d oil or gas, or not enough to be<br />
economically worth produc<strong>in</strong>g. A successful well may conta<strong>in</strong> either oil or gas,<br />
and often both, because the gas is dissolved <strong>in</strong> the oil. When gas is present <strong>in</strong> oil,<br />
itisextracted from the liquid at the surface <strong>in</strong> a process. Oil production and this<br />
process is not the same.<br />
Search<strong>in</strong>g for oil <strong>in</strong> a field where it had not yet been discovered is called<br />
wild cat well. It has a low chance of success. Only one out of five wildcat wells<br />
found oil or gas. The rest were dry holes. Better <strong>in</strong>formation, especially from<br />
seismic technology, has improved the success rate to one out of three and,<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to latest <strong>in</strong>formation, one <strong>in</strong> two. Reduc<strong>in</strong>g the money wasted on dry<br />
holes is one of the aspects of upstream activity that has allowed the <strong>in</strong>dustry to<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d and produce oil at the prices prevail<strong>in</strong>g over much of the 1990'S. After a<br />
successful well that identifies the presence of oil and gas, additional wells are<br />
drilled to test the production conditions and determ<strong>in</strong>e the boundaries of the<br />
reservoir. F<strong>in</strong>ally, production wells, or development wells are put <strong>in</strong> place, along<br />
with tanks, pipel<strong>in</strong>es and gas process<strong>in</strong>g plants. So the oil can be produced,<br />
moved to markets and sold. Once extracted, the crude oil must be ref<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>to<br />
usable products for market<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
38
3.2.4.3 How Oil is Produced<br />
The most important determ<strong>in</strong>ant of whether the reservoir is economically<br />
viable or not is the naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g pressure <strong>in</strong> the underground reservoir.<br />
The pressure varies with the characteristics of the trap, the reservoir rock and the<br />
production history. Most oil is produced by 'natural lift' production methods.<br />
The pressure <strong>in</strong> the underground is high enough to force the oil to the surface.<br />
Reservoirs <strong>in</strong> the Middle East tend to be long-lived on 'natural lift' that is the<br />
reservoir pressure cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be great enough to force the oil out.<br />
Undergroundpressure <strong>in</strong> older reservoirs eventually dissipates, and oil no longer<br />
flows to the surface naturally. It must be pumped out by means of an 'artificial<br />
lift'. Apump powered by gas or electricity is used to lift crude oil. Majority of the<br />
oil from the reservoirs <strong>in</strong> the United States are produced us<strong>in</strong>g some k<strong>in</strong>d of<br />
artificial lift us<strong>in</strong>g pumps. Itgives better output also.<br />
Primary production methods become <strong>in</strong>effective over a period of time and<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ued production requires the use of additional secondary production<br />
methods. One common method uses water to displace oil, us<strong>in</strong>g a method called<br />
waterflood, which forces the oil to the drilled shaft or wellbore. Producers may<br />
need to for tertiary or enhanced oil recovery methods. These techniques are often<br />
focussed on <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the flow characteristics of oil through the use of steam,<br />
carbon dioxide and other gases or chemicals. In the United States, primary<br />
production methods account for less than 40 percent of the oil produced on a<br />
daily basis, secondary methods account for about half, and tertiary recovery the<br />
rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 10 percent. Both the vary<strong>in</strong>g reservoir characteristics and the physical<br />
characteristics of the crude oil are important components of the cost of produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
oil. The costs can range from $2 per barrel <strong>in</strong> the Middle East to more than $15<br />
per barrel <strong>in</strong> some fields <strong>in</strong> the United States. This cost <strong>in</strong>cludes capital recovery<br />
also.<br />
3.2.4.4 The Impact of Upstream Technology<br />
Revolutioniz<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation available about the features of a geologic<br />
structure has enhanced the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil. A primary benefit is the ability to<br />
elim<strong>in</strong>ate poor prospects. This is considerably reduc<strong>in</strong>g wasted expenditures on<br />
39
dry holes. Drill<strong>in</strong>g and production technologies have made it possible to exploit<br />
reservoirs that would formerly have been too costly to put <strong>in</strong>to production and to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease the recovery from exist<strong>in</strong>g reservoirs. Technology also has contributed to<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g oil exploration and production safer for the <strong>in</strong>dustry and for the<br />
environment. Offshore production can be operated from onshore. The automatic<br />
shutoff systems is used to m<strong>in</strong>imize the pollution risk. The proven crude oil<br />
reserves have <strong>in</strong>creased from about 650 billion barrels <strong>in</strong> 1977 to about 900<br />
billion barrels <strong>in</strong> 1987 and further to about 1074 billion barrels as at the end of<br />
2001. This has been possible due to the susta<strong>in</strong>ed efforts <strong>in</strong> Oil exploration. The<br />
Organization of <strong>Petroleum</strong> Export<strong>in</strong>g Countries, popularly called the OPEC<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ues to dom<strong>in</strong>ate the share of world oil reserves. Its share <strong>in</strong> world oil<br />
reserves has <strong>in</strong>creased from 67 % <strong>in</strong> 1977 (436.2 billion barrels) to 77% <strong>in</strong> 2001<br />
(845 billion barrels). As a country, Saudi Arabia has the highest oil reserves <strong>in</strong> the<br />
world with a share of 25 %, followedby Iraq, UAE, and Iran, each with 10 -11 % of<br />
world oil reserves. The proven crude oil reserves as at end of 2001 are given <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 3.1<br />
Table 3.1 World proven crude oil reserves byregion, 1996·2001 (rn. b.)<br />
Region 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
North America 30722 30652 31272 30147 33066 33346<br />
Lat<strong>in</strong> America 138762 140342 141909 123104 123780 123896<br />
Eastern Europe 67366 67374 67281 67260 67160 66790<br />
Western Europe 18540 18751 18348 18843 18033 18128<br />
Middle East 675996 676755 677806 678737 694754 696261<br />
Africa 74776 75195 76980 83504 90004 92797<br />
Asia and Pacific 43428 43438 44255 44387 44391 44980<br />
Total World 1049590 1052508 1057853 1045381 1070686 1074850<br />
OPEC 802819 806080 810144 818247 840538 845412<br />
OPEC Percentage 76.5 76.6 76.6 78.2 78.5 78.7<br />
Source: OPEC Annual report 2001<br />
Crude oil available at all places does not have the same quality. Specific<br />
Gravity and sulfur content of crude oil ma<strong>in</strong>ly decide quality. Production of crude<br />
oil is gradually<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g because the demand is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. Table 3.1 shows that<br />
availability of crude is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g, rather it is not decreas<strong>in</strong>g when compared to<br />
production. Phenomenon of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g production is cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all other<br />
countries.<br />
40
flows, dictated by economics, logistics, and temporary imbalances <strong>in</strong> supply and<br />
demand, are vital to the efficient operation of the oil market.<br />
3.2.6 Regional Importers and Exporters<br />
North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific are the world's three largest<br />
consum<strong>in</strong>g regions. They are all importers. All the other regions are<br />
exporters. The Middle East still exports more oil than any other region. Despite<br />
the strong growth <strong>in</strong> production <strong>in</strong> other areas <strong>in</strong> recent years they cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be<br />
the largest exporters. This global dependence on Middle East oil makes the geo<br />
political importance of the Middle East. There is less variation among the<br />
import<strong>in</strong>g regions. In the decade preced<strong>in</strong>g its 1997-98 f<strong>in</strong>ancial crisis, Asia<br />
Pacific's economic boom propelled it <strong>in</strong>to the number one spot, with import<br />
growth more than double that of any other region's. The United States is the<br />
largest <strong>in</strong>dividual importer, both net and gross put together. North America as a<br />
region ranks third because Canada and Mexicoare two of the United States' three<br />
top oilsuppliers. Their exports to the United States offset U.S. imports from these<br />
neighbors <strong>in</strong> the regional calculation. Net imports are gross imports m<strong>in</strong>us gross<br />
exports. This has kept North America's import dependency down to around 30<br />
percent, half that of the Asia-Pacific region at its 1997 peak. Asia-Pacific region's<br />
import dependency and even its import volume make it as the world's top<br />
import<strong>in</strong>g region. This is ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the lesser domestic production.<br />
3.2.7 Global Patterns of Oil Trade<br />
Purchas<strong>in</strong>g is an important activity <strong>in</strong> the petroleum supply cha<strong>in</strong>. To<br />
make the purchas<strong>in</strong>g effective, one must be aware of the trade practices<br />
prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry. This section deals with the crude oil trade patterns and<br />
practices prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
3.2.7.1 Oil Trade: Highest Volume, HighestValue<br />
International trade of oil is more than anyth<strong>in</strong>g else. This is true whether<br />
one measures trade by volume or by its value, or by the carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity needed<br />
to move it. All measures are important for different reasons. Volume provides<br />
<strong>in</strong>sights about whether markets are over supplied or under-supplied and whether<br />
42
the <strong>in</strong>frastructure is adequate to accommodate the required flow or not. Value<br />
allows governments and economists to assess patterns of <strong>in</strong>ternational trade and<br />
balance of trade and balance of payments. Carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity allows the shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry to assess how many tankers are required and on what routes.<br />
Transportation and storage play a critical additional role here. They are not just<br />
the physical l<strong>in</strong>k between the importers and the exporters, but between producers<br />
and ref<strong>in</strong>ers, ref<strong>in</strong>ers and marketers, and marketers and consumers; their<br />
associated costs are a primary factor <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the pattern of world trade.<br />
These factors contribute to the smooth flow of crude oil.<br />
3.2.7.2 Distance: The Nearest Market First<br />
Crude oil and petroleum products flow to the markets that provide the<br />
highest value to the supplier. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g else be<strong>in</strong>g equal, oil is traded and<br />
transported to the nearest market first, because that has the lowest<br />
transportation cost. It therefore provides the supplier with the highest net<br />
revenue, <strong>in</strong> oil market term<strong>in</strong>ology, the highest netback. If this market cannot<br />
absorb all the oil, the balance moves to the next closest market and the next and<br />
so on. This will cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong>curr<strong>in</strong>g progressively higher transportation costs, until<br />
all the oil is sold. The recent growth <strong>in</strong> dependence of the United States on its<br />
Western Hemisphere neighbors is an illustration of this 'nearer-is-better'<br />
syndrome. Western Hemisphere sources now supply over half of the United<br />
States import volume, much of it on voyages of less than a week. Another quarter<br />
comes from elsewhere <strong>in</strong> the area called the Atlantic Bas<strong>in</strong>. Those countries are<br />
on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. This oil, especially from the North Sea and<br />
Africa, takes just 2-3 weeks to reach the United States, and boosts the so-called<br />
short-haul share of U.S. imports to over three-quarters. Most North Sea and<br />
North and West African crude oils stay <strong>in</strong> the Atlantic Bas<strong>in</strong>, mov<strong>in</strong>g to Europe or<br />
North America on routes that rarely take over 20 days. In contrast, voyage times<br />
to Asia for the nearest of these, the West African crude oils, would be over 30<br />
days to S<strong>in</strong>gapore, ris<strong>in</strong>g to nearly 40 for Japan. Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, therefore, most<br />
of Asia's oil comes <strong>in</strong>stead from the Middle East, only 20-30 days away. Mexico<br />
and Venezuela have consciously helped the trend toward short-haul shipments.<br />
They pro-actively took the strategic decision to make as large and as profitable<br />
43
market. They make it possible for poor quality crude oil also. Their reserves are<br />
unusually biased toward those hard-to-place grades. Both countries therefore<br />
targeted their nearest markets. They target U.S. Gulf Coast and the Caribbean for<br />
jo<strong>in</strong>t venture ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong>vestments. They began with ref<strong>in</strong>eries that had<br />
traditionally run their crude oil, and then with ref<strong>in</strong>eries that might be upgraded<br />
to do so. This policy has turned poor quality crude oil to be preferred at these<br />
sites. Western Hemisphere has significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the crude oil self<br />
sufficiency with this policy.<br />
Shipp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry will get affected by a change <strong>in</strong> trade flow patern.A<br />
change <strong>in</strong> trade flow patterns can also be of critical importance to the shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry. For example, the Suez crisis of 1957 forced tanker owners back to us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the much longer route around the Cape of Good Hope, and resulted <strong>in</strong> the<br />
development of Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) to reduce that voyage's higher<br />
costs. The shift to short-haul routes <strong>in</strong> the 1990'S was also critical. Us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
growth <strong>in</strong> world trade volumes as a proxy for demand, tanker owners had been<br />
expect<strong>in</strong>g a return to a strong tanker market. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the surge <strong>in</strong><br />
short haul imports <strong>in</strong> the Atlantic Bas<strong>in</strong> and the shift of Middle East exports from<br />
the longer United States to shorter Asian voyages led to a sharp decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />
average voyage length. This decl<strong>in</strong>e was accelerated by the return of Iraqi crude<br />
exports, many of which move on the extremely short route from the Black Sea<br />
end ofthe Iraq-Turkey pipel<strong>in</strong>e to the Mediterranean. The tanker owners' outlook<br />
was thus fad<strong>in</strong>g even before world trade volumes were underm<strong>in</strong>ed by the Asian<br />
crisis. In practice, trade flows do not always follow the simple 'nearest first'<br />
pattern. Three important factors that tie <strong>in</strong>to profitability of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery configurations, product demand mix, product quality specifications, and<br />
politics can all change the rank<strong>in</strong>gs. Different markets frequently place different<br />
values on particular grades of oil. Thus, a low sulfur diesel is worth more <strong>in</strong> the<br />
United States, where the maximum allowable sulfur is 0.05 percent by weight,<br />
than <strong>in</strong> Africa, where the maximum can be 10 to 20 times higher. Similarly,<br />
African crude oils are worth relatively more <strong>in</strong> Asia, where they may allow a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>er to meet tighter sulfur limits <strong>in</strong> the region without <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
upgrades. Such differences <strong>in</strong> valu<strong>in</strong>g quality can be sufficient to overcome<br />
44
transportation cost disadvantages, as the relatively recent establishment of a<br />
significant trade <strong>in</strong> long-distance African crude oils to Asia shows. The cost of<br />
transportation of crude oil will change when the government policies such as<br />
tariff changes. The balance on transportation can be lost due to these types of<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> policies.<br />
3.2.7.3 Crude versus Products<br />
World oil trade is still dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the trade <strong>in</strong> crude oil. Quality changes<br />
<strong>in</strong> product are one of the ma<strong>in</strong> reasons. The risk-weighted economics clearly<br />
support position<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries close to consumers rather than close to the<br />
wellhead. This position<strong>in</strong>g policy takes maximum advantage of the economies of<br />
scale of large ships; especially as local quality specifications are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
fragment<strong>in</strong>g the product market. It maximizes the ref<strong>in</strong>er's ability to tailor the<br />
product output to the market's short-term surges such as those caused by<br />
weather, equipment outages, etc. In addition, this policy also guards aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />
very real risk that governments will impose on selective import restrictions to<br />
protect their domestic ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector. As noted <strong>in</strong> the section on, there are a<br />
limited number of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centers that are at odds with this general rule, hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
been developed to serve particular export markets. These export ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centers<br />
give rise to some regular <strong>in</strong>ter-regional product moves, but they are the<br />
exceptions. Major export ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centres are S<strong>in</strong>gapore, the Caribbean, and the<br />
Middle East. The <strong>in</strong>ter-regional products trade is largely a temporary market<br />
balanc<strong>in</strong>g function. Some <strong>in</strong>ter-regional flows are extremely short lived, as when<br />
extremely cold weather <strong>in</strong> Europe causes the United States to export heat<strong>in</strong>g oil.<br />
Alonger-lived example arose when a large proportion of European drivers opted<br />
for diesel cars, leav<strong>in</strong>g the region <strong>in</strong> the late 1990'S with surplus capacity to<br />
produce gasol<strong>in</strong>e for export to the United States. This gave a new product<br />
demand pattern and transport requirements <strong>in</strong> that scetor.<br />
3.2.7.4 Tankers and Pipel<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Tankers and pipel<strong>in</strong>es are the two modes used for transportation of <strong>in</strong>ter<br />
regional trade. Tankers have made use for <strong>in</strong>tercont<strong>in</strong>ental transport of crude oil.<br />
The major reasons for us<strong>in</strong>g tankers are, they are low cost, efficient, and<br />
45
extremely flexible. Pipel<strong>in</strong>es are the mode preferred for transcont<strong>in</strong>ental crude<br />
oil movements. All tanker trade routes do not use the same size ship. Each route<br />
usually has one size that is clearly work out the economics best. The size is<br />
selected on the basis of voyage length, port and canal constra<strong>in</strong>ts, and volume.<br />
Crude oil exports from the Middle East are moved ma<strong>in</strong>ly by Very Large Crude<br />
Carriers (VLCC's) typically carry<strong>in</strong>g over 2 million barrels of oil on every voyage.<br />
Pipel<strong>in</strong>es are critical for landlocked crude oils and they also complement tankers<br />
at certa<strong>in</strong> key locations by reliev<strong>in</strong>g bottlenecks transport or provid<strong>in</strong>g shortcuts<br />
to certa<strong>in</strong> other places. The only <strong>in</strong>ter-regional trade that currently relies solely<br />
on pipel<strong>in</strong>es is crude from Russia to Europe. Pipel<strong>in</strong>es contribute ma<strong>in</strong> role <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tra-regional trade. They are the primary option for transcont<strong>in</strong>ental<br />
transportation <strong>in</strong> almost all part of the world. They are cheaper to a great extend<br />
than any alternative such as rail, barge, or road. The development <strong>in</strong> technology<br />
<strong>in</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g of large diameter pipel<strong>in</strong>es dur<strong>in</strong>g World War 11 allowed the<br />
development of the vast pipel<strong>in</strong>e network that moves crude oil and product.<br />
Fungibility is an important factor <strong>in</strong> transportation economics of crude oil<br />
and products. Fungibility is the ability to substitute one shipment for another, to<br />
exchange between regions. Because the oil is broadly <strong>in</strong>terchangeable (fungible),<br />
it can be mixed without any significant change <strong>in</strong> value. Environmental<br />
mandates have required different regional and seasonal qualities of gasol<strong>in</strong>e. The<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> mandates <strong>in</strong>creased substantially <strong>in</strong> batch<strong>in</strong>g for transport and<br />
segregation for storage. Thus the logistics flexibility <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> a product's<br />
fungibility has disappeared. This is <strong>in</strong>visible to consumers dur<strong>in</strong>g normal times.<br />
This adversely contributes to market upheavals and price spikes <strong>in</strong> times of<br />
sudden changes<strong>in</strong> demand or supply, as dur<strong>in</strong>g the early driv<strong>in</strong>g season <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />
Table 3.3 World exports of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products by region, 1996·2001(1000b/d)<br />
Region names 1996 1997 1988 1999 2000 2001<br />
North America 1203.6 1251.3 1174.2 1171.2 1360.3 1374.5<br />
Lat<strong>in</strong> America 1848.1 2002.2 2130.5 2079.2 2063.9 2131.7<br />
Eastern Europe 1188.9 1220.7 1112.8 1143.8 1325.8 1512.3<br />
Western Europe 4154.9 4246.3 4263.2 4252.7 4436.1 4454.1<br />
Middle East 3197.3 3335.9 3284.2 3302.1 3140.3 2962.6<br />
Africa 871.0 1049.4 957.6 1162.2 1142.7 1193.6<br />
Asia and Pacific 2697.1 2970.8 2936.4 2852.7 2844.1 2869.8<br />
Total World 15160.9 16076.7 15858.9 15963.9 16313.0 16498.5<br />
OPEC 4411.7 4668.0 4580.2 4745.3 4506.8 4317.8<br />
OPEC % 29.1 29.0 28.9 29.7 27.6 26.2<br />
Source: OPEC Annual report,2001<br />
46
temperatures. Middle distillates (jet fuel, kerosene, distillates such as home<br />
heat<strong>in</strong>g oil and diesel fuel) come next. The heaviest products (residuum or<br />
residual fuel oil) are recovered as the last. The heavier fractions are processed<br />
<strong>in</strong>to lighter products to maximize the output of the most desirable products.<br />
3.2.8.2 Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Downstream process<strong>in</strong>g is grouped together <strong>in</strong> this section. Downstream<br />
process is the process that follows crude oil distillation. This <strong>in</strong>cludes and<br />
requires a very large variety of highly complex units designed for very different<br />
upgrad<strong>in</strong>g processes. Downstream process makes some change <strong>in</strong> the molecular<br />
structure of the <strong>in</strong>put with chemical reactions, and some with thermal reactions.<br />
Chemical reactions <strong>in</strong> crude oil are normally tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> the presence of a<br />
catalyst. These processes are designed to take heavy, low-valued feedstock and<br />
change it <strong>in</strong>to lighter, higher-valued output. A catalytic cracker uses the gas oil,<br />
heavy distillate, output from crude distillation as its feedstock and produces<br />
additional f<strong>in</strong>ished distillates (heat<strong>in</strong>g oil and diesel) and gasol<strong>in</strong>e. Sulfur<br />
removal is accomplished <strong>in</strong> a hydrotreater. A reform<strong>in</strong>g unit produces higher<br />
octane components for gasol<strong>in</strong>e from lower octane feedstock that was recovered<br />
<strong>in</strong> the distillation process. A coker uses the heaviest output of distillation, the<br />
residue, to produce a lighter feedstock for further process<strong>in</strong>g, as well as<br />
petroleum coke. The output from simple distillation of a crude oil like Arab Light<br />
would be about 20 percent of lightest, gasol<strong>in</strong>e-like products, and about 50<br />
percent ofthe heaviest. Further process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the most sophisticated ref<strong>in</strong>ery can<br />
produce the f<strong>in</strong>ished product output <strong>in</strong> to about 60 percent gasol<strong>in</strong>e, and 5<br />
percent heaviest.<br />
3.2.8.3 Crude Oil Quality<br />
Crude oil with a similar mix of physical and chemical characteristics,<br />
usually produced from a given reservoir constitutes a crude oil stream. Crude oils<br />
are classified by their density and sulfur content. Less dense (lighter) crude oils<br />
generally have a higher share of light hydrocarbons. It is a higher value product.<br />
It can be recovered with simple distillation. The denser (heavier) crude oils<br />
produce a greater share of lower-valued products with simple distillation and<br />
51
equire additional process<strong>in</strong>g to produce the desired range of products. Some<br />
crude oils also have higher sulfur content. It is an undesirable characteristic with<br />
respect to both process<strong>in</strong>g and product quality. For pric<strong>in</strong>g purposes crude oils of<br />
similar quality are often compared to a s<strong>in</strong>gle representative crude oil. This is the<br />
benchmark of the quality of crude oil.<br />
Process<strong>in</strong>g and re-process<strong>in</strong>g necessary to achieve the optimal mix of<br />
product output is decided by the quality of the crude oil. Premium crude oil like<br />
West Texas Intermediate has a relatively high natural yield of desirable naphtha<br />
and straight-run gasol<strong>in</strong>e. Nigeria's Bonny Light, has a high natural yield of<br />
middle distillates. Saudi Arabia's Arabian Light is a heavy residue (residuum)<br />
that must be reprocessed or sold at a discount to crude oil. West Texas<br />
Intermediate and Bonny Light have a yield of about one-third residuum after the<br />
simple distillation process.<br />
The type of hydrocarbon molecules and other natural characteristics<br />
affects the cost of process<strong>in</strong>g. The molecular structure of a crude oil also decides<br />
the suitability of a crude oil for the manufacture of special products such as<br />
lubricat<strong>in</strong>g oils. Ref<strong>in</strong>ers therefore try to ref<strong>in</strong>e the optimal mix of crude oils<br />
through their ref<strong>in</strong>eries, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the ref<strong>in</strong>ery's equipment, the desired<br />
output mix, and the relative price of available crude oil.<br />
3.2.8.4 Other Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Inputs<br />
A variety of other specialized <strong>in</strong>puts enhances the ref<strong>in</strong>er's capability to<br />
make the desired mix of products. Among these products might be unf<strong>in</strong>ished<br />
oil, or imported residual fuel oil used as <strong>in</strong>put to a vacuum distillation unit. The<br />
world crude oil reserves are concentrated <strong>in</strong> a few countries, whereas the demand<br />
for petroleum products is almost universal. This leads to the need for distribution<br />
ofcrude and products obta<strong>in</strong>ed after ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to all over the world. International<br />
trade <strong>in</strong> crude oil and petroleum products is a large and active market. In 1997,<br />
about 1544 million tons of crude oil and 435 million tons of petroleum products<br />
were traded worldwide. Table 3.8. shows the world ref<strong>in</strong>ery capacity, region wise.<br />
An important observation made is that though the crude capacity of OPEC is<br />
52
Figure 3.8. World map on ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
Later years the situation improved substantially and world wide capacity<br />
atilization improved to 88% <strong>in</strong> 1994, which has further improved to a level of<br />
90% <strong>in</strong> 2000. Consider<strong>in</strong>g this level of capacity utilization, 43soMMTPA of<br />
ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity must be there to meet the crude oil process<strong>in</strong>g requirement by<br />
the year 2010. This necessitates an <strong>in</strong>crease of 780MMTPA ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity.<br />
Although much of <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> capacity will come from expansion of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries, many new ref<strong>in</strong>eries must be commissioned to meet the forecast<br />
demand of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. In Asia Pacific region, 7S% of the region's ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
capacity is concentrated <strong>in</strong> six countries Le. <strong>in</strong> Japan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, South Korea, India,<br />
Indonesia and S<strong>in</strong>gapore. Asia's <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g Oil demand represents almost 70% of<br />
worldwide growth. To meet <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>in</strong> petroleum products, total<br />
ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> Asia pacific is likely to <strong>in</strong>crease from lS.30 million b/day<br />
(76SMMTPA) <strong>in</strong> 1993 to 20.1 million bid (1000 MMTPA) <strong>in</strong> 200S. It can be<br />
clearly seenfrom fig. 3.8 that ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is done nearer to po<strong>in</strong>t ofconsumption. As<br />
per estimates, 42 grass root ref<strong>in</strong>eries are under construction and plann<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
<strong>in</strong> the region. Total capacity of these projects is about 17SMMTPA. Out of this<br />
6SMMTPA capacity is considered firm and another 6SMMTPA is expected to be<br />
<strong>in</strong>stalled by expansion <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries. However the capacity utilization of<br />
OPEC is above 100 percent. The global ref<strong>in</strong>ed out put is 7298.9 bb/d, Table 3.8<br />
shnws the detailed region wise out put of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products It can also be observed<br />
that the lowest ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity is <strong>in</strong> Africa. Table 3.7 shows the world<br />
consumption of petroleum products by region. North America is the largest<br />
consumer (2036.99bb/d <strong>in</strong> 2001) followed by Asia and Pacific.<br />
54
Table 3.10. Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> Asia Pacific (OOObb/d)<br />
Country 1993 2000 2005<br />
Japan 5005 5500 5500<br />
Korea 1675 2488 2488<br />
Taiwan 600 720 900<br />
S<strong>in</strong>Qapore 1085 1135 1135<br />
Indonesia 856 1011 1131<br />
Malaysia 230 450 450<br />
Thailand 395 780 780<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es 296 399 399<br />
India 1086 1598 2025<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 3200 3900 4400<br />
Australia 732 807 807<br />
New Zealand 92 92 92<br />
Total 15302 18880 20107<br />
Source. OPECAnnual report,2002<br />
3.2.9 Stocks of Crude oil<br />
This section discusses the availability and consumption of crude oil <strong>in</strong> the<br />
global, regional, and local scenario.<br />
3.2.9.1 Why Stocks Are Important<br />
There are 7.8 billion barrels of oil tied up with <strong>in</strong>dustry and government<br />
stocks. The reason for those stocks is to keep the global supply smooth. The oil is<br />
stored <strong>in</strong> pipel<strong>in</strong>es from oil well, crude oil tanks, tankers, the pipel<strong>in</strong>es to the<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries, rail wagons, road tankers, and tank to retail outlets. All these put<br />
together make the oil <strong>in</strong>dustry deliver the right product to the right location at<br />
the right time. Only 10 percentage of this sock is available to the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to the demand of the <strong>in</strong>dustry. When the level of stock reduces <strong>in</strong> a<br />
particular market, the price of crude oil will go up. It will lead to encourage extra<br />
supply and the prices will come down. When the stocks are high, the prices of<br />
crude oil come down <strong>in</strong> that region. Projected stocks are considered as an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicator of prices of crude oil <strong>in</strong> a market. So it is closely monitored. It is difficult<br />
to closely monitor the global stock due to the diversified market locations. The<br />
United States is the only country to publish comprehensive weekly stock data.<br />
They have the largest commercial stock (one billion barrels). Largest part of<br />
crude oil stock is <strong>in</strong> Gulf Coast. East Coast is hav<strong>in</strong>g the greatest f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />
products <strong>in</strong>ventories.<br />
55
World's majority of the storage capacity is owned by the companies that<br />
produce, ref<strong>in</strong>e, or market the oil. Independent operators also store a small<br />
important portion. They are hold<strong>in</strong>g it at the world's ma<strong>in</strong> trad<strong>in</strong>g hubs. This<br />
small portion makes the hubs successful and viable. The <strong>in</strong>dependent storage<br />
volume is a key <strong>in</strong>dicator to what is happen<strong>in</strong>g to discretionary stocks.<br />
3.2.9.2 Stocks are Seasonal<br />
Oil stock <strong>in</strong> the world follows a seasonal pattern. In the middle of w<strong>in</strong>ter it<br />
goes downand goes up <strong>in</strong> the spr<strong>in</strong>g. Itleads to high price <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter and low price<br />
<strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g. Reason for stock change is the demand for products. Heat<strong>in</strong>g oil,<br />
propane, and kerosene demand drive world oil seasonality. Crude oil stocks are<br />
also seasonal. When the ref<strong>in</strong>eries make maximum through put, the stock will<br />
come down and stock will go up when the ref<strong>in</strong>eries go for shutdown<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. Asia's ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g system has its maximum output <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter and<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong> summer due to scheduled ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. Maximum through put <strong>in</strong><br />
US is <strong>in</strong> summer and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance is <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter. So the stock fluctuation <strong>in</strong> crude<br />
oil <strong>in</strong> the global level is m<strong>in</strong>imum. The product stock variation is more than that<br />
of oil stocks.<br />
3.2.9.3 Strategic Stocks<br />
Government controlled stocks are called strategic stocks. It is a buffer<br />
stock aga<strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>terruption <strong>in</strong> supply of crude oil. The largest of the strategic stock<br />
is with US Strategic <strong>Petroleum</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> (SPS). The <strong>in</strong>ternational Energy Agency's<br />
rule says that each participat<strong>in</strong>g nation must hold stocks equal to 90 days of<br />
imports. Most of the nations meet the requirement with <strong>in</strong>dustry owned stocks.<br />
United States, Japan, and a few other nations hold government controlled stocks.<br />
3.2.9.4 Costs and Profits<br />
Money is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g up stocks. Quantum of money depends up<br />
on the type ofoil, quantity stored, ownership of storage facility, price of crude oil,<br />
and the opportunity cost of money. The cost <strong>in</strong>ventory becomes significant to the<br />
56
marg<strong>in</strong> of the stake holders. Every petroleum station, term<strong>in</strong>al, and ref<strong>in</strong>ery must<br />
have some <strong>in</strong>ventory. This <strong>in</strong>creases the quantity of stock <strong>in</strong> different stages.<br />
Through consolidation of <strong>in</strong>dustry this stock can be m<strong>in</strong>imized. Stock need not be<br />
treated as a money spend<strong>in</strong>g area alone. Stocks can be used for mak<strong>in</strong>g profit<br />
also. Stocks can be made when one company expects hike <strong>in</strong> oil price and if they<br />
have money to <strong>in</strong>vest, they can stock oil to make profit through purchase.<br />
3.2.10 Prices of CrudeOil<br />
Demand for one product is also connected with demand for another<br />
product. Demand for each product <strong>in</strong> each region establishes a price level for<br />
crude oil and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. The price fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the products are small<br />
and it is the <strong>in</strong>terest of buyers and sellers with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry. The stability <strong>in</strong><br />
prices can be affected by different reasons. They are sudden <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> demand,<br />
storage <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries, and demand surges. Prices shoot up <strong>in</strong>itially and then<br />
stabilizes when the fluctuation <strong>in</strong> demand stabilize. The crude oil price slashed <strong>in</strong><br />
1998 and price <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> 2000 took longer period to come back. These are<br />
exceptions <strong>in</strong> the oil price consistency pattern.<br />
3.2.10.1 Overview: Costs plus Market Conditions<br />
Like any other goods and services, price of crude oil is affected by<br />
products' underly<strong>in</strong>g cost and market conditions. Price is also affected by the<br />
consumer behaviour.<br />
The pre-tax price of gasol<strong>in</strong>e (or any other ref<strong>in</strong>ed oil product) reflects:<br />
• Its raw material, crude oil<br />
• Transportation from produc<strong>in</strong>g field to ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
• Process<strong>in</strong>g that raw material <strong>in</strong>to ref<strong>in</strong>ed products (ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g)<br />
• Transportation from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery to the consum<strong>in</strong>g market<br />
• Transportation, storage and distribution between the market<br />
distribution center and the retail outlet or consumer.<br />
• Market conditions at each stage along the way, and <strong>in</strong> the local market<br />
Crude oil is the raw material for petroleum products. <strong>Supply</strong> and demand<br />
conditions <strong>in</strong> the global market decide the price of crude oil. Global market is<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly based on the trades <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gapore, Northwest Europe, US, and Gulf Cost.<br />
Price of products is based on the price of crude oil. The ref<strong>in</strong>ed products are<br />
57
marketed through ma<strong>in</strong> distribution centres. Products from the ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> that<br />
area, shipments, and imported products form the product suppliers. These<br />
products are distributed to local retailers us<strong>in</strong>g barges, railways, pipel<strong>in</strong>es, and<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ally trucks. Oil markets are <strong>in</strong>ter-connected by the supply <strong>in</strong> one region from<br />
the other regions. So the products prices are affected by the prices abroad.<br />
Many transactions are tak<strong>in</strong>g place for oil at different parts of the world.<br />
Price of oil based on those transactions. Production of oil is almost constant<br />
through control of OPECcountries. Oil prices are fixed on the basis of bidd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational market. When the demand is more and supply is less, the bidder<br />
will be forced to pay more. This is called strong market. When the demand is less<br />
supply is more, the bidder will be <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> pay<strong>in</strong>g less. This is called weak<br />
market. Bidders need not always compete. Depends on their stock position they<br />
may wait for the price to come down to their desired level. When the prices come<br />
down, they will come for bidd<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Transactions are also different types <strong>in</strong> oil market. The most common type<br />
is contract purchase. The price is fixed <strong>in</strong> advance for the delivery <strong>in</strong> a later<br />
period. Spot transaction is also prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the oil market. When the contract<br />
quantity is not enough for a ref<strong>in</strong>er, may go for spot transaction. Demand for<br />
different crude oil also leads to spot transaction. Oil is also traded <strong>in</strong> future<br />
markets. This is for cover<strong>in</strong>g risk due to price fluctuation. This is based on the<br />
expectation of price of oil <strong>in</strong> the market. In this market physical supply of oil is<br />
not common. Spot market gives a clear idea about the trend <strong>in</strong> demand and<br />
supply. Increase <strong>in</strong> price means more demand for the products and decrease <strong>in</strong><br />
price <strong>in</strong>dicates reduction <strong>in</strong> demand for crude oil. Majority of oil be<strong>in</strong>g traded <strong>in</strong><br />
contract terms, the price changes are based on spot purchase. Futures market<br />
also gives <strong>in</strong>dication on the trend <strong>in</strong> the demand and supply balance. Seasonal<br />
changes are the other important factors that affect the price of oil. In cold seasons<br />
the demand will be more and <strong>in</strong> hot seasons the demand will be less. This also<br />
will affect the price of oil <strong>in</strong> region. Regionaldemand can affect the consistency of<br />
price. Government policies are another factor that can affect the price of crude<br />
oil.<br />
58
3.3 <strong>Indian</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
So far the discussion was on the world scenario of petroleum supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Now the petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> India willbe discussed.<br />
3.3.1 Availability of crude oil <strong>in</strong> India<br />
Despite the existence of other sources of energy like electricity, petroleum,<br />
andnatural gas, sub-sector has witnessed a very rapid rate of growth. The limited<br />
resources of oil and natural gas and stabilization of <strong>in</strong>digenous oil production at<br />
around 33.682 MMT PA, the gap between oil production and consumption has<br />
widened over the years.<br />
The production reached a level of<br />
35.17MMT dur<strong>in</strong>g 1995-96, which is the<br />
highest level reached by the country so<br />
far. However, subsequent years<br />
witnessed shortfall <strong>in</strong> the production of<br />
crude oil. It is clear from Table 3.11 that<br />
the production of crude oil is consistently<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g. The ma<strong>in</strong> reason is that India<br />
Table 3.11 Selfreliance of<br />
<strong>Petroleum</strong> products<br />
Domestic Consump Self<br />
Year Production tionl relianc<br />
(MMT Demand e (%)<br />
1989-90 34.09 54.10 63<br />
1990-91 33.02 55.04 56<br />
1991-92 30.35 56.97 50<br />
1992-93 26.95 58.90 43<br />
1993-94 27.03 61.54 41<br />
1994-95 32.24 67.45 45<br />
1995-96 35.17 74.67 44<br />
1996-97 32.90 79.17 39<br />
1997-98 33.95 85.49 37<br />
1998-99 32.72 90.80 34<br />
1999-00 33.86 96.44 33<br />
could not f<strong>in</strong>d new crude oil sources. The consumption was shoot<strong>in</strong>g up from<br />
54.1MMT <strong>in</strong> 1990 to 96.44 MMT <strong>in</strong>2000. This <strong>in</strong>crease of 78% <strong>in</strong> demand<br />
affected our self-reliance very badly to reduce from63% <strong>in</strong>1990 to 33%<strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />
So 2/3 rd of our crude oil demand is met by import. The major reasons for<br />
comparatively low growth <strong>in</strong> oil production are<br />
• No major discoveries of oil resources<br />
• Most oil fields are enter<strong>in</strong>g the natural decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g phase<br />
• Reservoir management problems <strong>in</strong> Mumbai high, Nedam &<br />
Gandhar etc.<br />
• Constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong> the North eastern region.<br />
59
- 18.$&4 . .;...<br />
.. +<br />
figure 3.9 Demand <strong>Supply</strong> Balance<br />
OverallDemand <strong>Supply</strong>Balance<br />
21.651<br />
It is clear from the figure 3.9 that India is lead<strong>in</strong>g to self-reliance <strong>in</strong> all the<br />
petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. Graph is drawn by deduct<strong>in</strong>g production from<br />
demand of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. The ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity as on 1.4.2002 was<br />
n6.07Million Metric Per Annum (MMTPA). Availability of petroleum products<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g 2002-03 from domestic ref<strong>in</strong>eries was adequate to meet the domestic<br />
demand except for Liquefied <strong>Petroleum</strong> Gas (LPG).The availability of petrol and<br />
diesel is <strong>in</strong> excess ofdomestic requirement and the surplus quantity was exported<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the year. At present, there are 18 ref<strong>in</strong>eries operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the country, (16 <strong>in</strong><br />
Public Sector, one <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t sector, and one <strong>in</strong> private sector). Out ofthe 16 Public<br />
Sector ref<strong>in</strong>eries, 7 are owned by <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), two by<br />
Cbennai <strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Limited (subsidiary of WCL), two by H<strong>in</strong>dustan<br />
<strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Limited (HPCL) and one each by Bharat <strong>Petroleum</strong><br />
Corporation Limited (BPCL), Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited (KRL)(subsidiary of<br />
BPCL), Bongaigaon Ref<strong>in</strong>ery &Petrochemicals Limited (BRPL) (subsidiary of<br />
[OCL), Numaligarh Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited (NRL)(subsidiary of BPCL) and Oil and<br />
Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC). There is one ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t sector<br />
viz. Mangalore Ref<strong>in</strong>ery &Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) and one ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong><br />
11,167<br />
private sectorviz. Reliance Industries Limited (RPL).<br />
Import and Exports: The quantity ofcrude oil imported (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g JVC<br />
I private companies) between April and November 2002 was 55.609 MMT,<br />
valued Rs. 49,680 crore. Besides, 4-494 MMTof other petroleum products valued<br />
at Rs. 5,029 crore were also imported dur<strong>in</strong>g the same period. Exports of<br />
61<br />
.... \
petroleum products was 6.607MMT, valued at Rs. 6,364 crore dur<strong>in</strong>g the same<br />
period. Import of crude oil has been made free with effect from 1 st April, 2001.<br />
Further, Government decided <strong>in</strong> May, 2001 to allow public sector oil companies<br />
toexercise the option to import their crude oil requirement themselves under the<br />
actual user licens<strong>in</strong>g policy or through IOCL. With a view to improve oil security,<br />
the oil companies made efforts towards diversification of crude oil sourc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g 2002-03.<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>eries' Pipel<strong>in</strong>e: Petronet India Limited (PIL) a non-PSD<br />
Company, has so far implemented Vad<strong>in</strong>ar - Kandla pipel<strong>in</strong>e and Kochi - Kurur<br />
pipel<strong>in</strong>e projects. Mangalore - Bangalore pipel<strong>in</strong>e project is at an advanced stage<br />
ofimplementation. To match the post APM scenario, MoP&NG vide notification<br />
F.No. P-20012/S/99-PP dated 20.11.2002 has issued guidel<strong>in</strong>es for lay<strong>in</strong>g<br />
petroleum product pipel<strong>in</strong>es. The new guidel<strong>in</strong>es for grant of right of user (RoD)<br />
<strong>in</strong> land do not contemplate any restrictions or conditions for grant of ROD for<br />
crude oil pipel<strong>in</strong>es. Product pipel<strong>in</strong>es have been categorized as follows:<br />
(i) Pipel<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from ref<strong>in</strong>eries, whether coastal or <strong>in</strong>land, upto a<br />
distance of around 300 kilometers from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery; (ii) Pipel<strong>in</strong>es dedicated for<br />
supply<strong>in</strong>g product to particular consumer, orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g either from a ref<strong>in</strong>ery or<br />
from oil company's term<strong>in</strong>al; and 23 pipel<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from ports and<br />
pipel<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from ref<strong>in</strong>eries exceed<strong>in</strong>g 300 km <strong>in</strong> length, other than<br />
those specified <strong>in</strong> (i) & (ii) above. As per the guidel<strong>in</strong>es, companies and <strong>in</strong>vestors<br />
will have complete freedom <strong>in</strong> respect of the pipel<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
or meant for captive use of companies for which RoD will be unconditional. As<br />
per the notification, the pipel<strong>in</strong>es exceed<strong>in</strong>g 300 km <strong>in</strong> length and those<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from a port location, grant of RoD will be subjected to the fulfillment<br />
ofcerta<strong>in</strong> conditions, like:<br />
• Oil companies/<strong>in</strong>vestors <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> lay<strong>in</strong>g a product pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from a ref<strong>in</strong>ery or a port would be required to publish the<br />
proposal <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g other <strong>in</strong>terested companies to take capacity <strong>in</strong> the<br />
pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
• Any oil company <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g the capacity of the pipel<strong>in</strong>e, will<br />
be able to do so on mutually agreed commercial terms and conditions.<br />
62
3.3.3 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Capacities And Capacity Utilization<br />
To meet the grow<strong>in</strong>g demand of petroleum products, the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity<br />
<strong>in</strong>the country has been gradually <strong>in</strong>creased over the years by sett<strong>in</strong>g up of new<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the country as well as by expand<strong>in</strong>g the capacity of the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
• The ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity, actual crude throughput and capacity utilisation dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
lastfive years are <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Table 3.13<br />
Table 3.13 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity utilization <strong>in</strong> India<br />
3.3.4 Private Ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
-96 96-97 97-98 98-99<br />
62.2 62.2<br />
65.2 68.5<br />
102.9 104.7 8<br />
Government of India has welcomed proposal for private <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g foreign <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector follow<strong>in</strong>g liberalization of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustrial policy. In pursuance of this policy, letters of Intent have been granted<br />
to 14 companies for sett<strong>in</strong>g up of ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the private sector for about 70<br />
MMTPA capacity<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g EOU ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />
3.3.5 Future of <strong>Petroleum</strong> Industry<br />
Production from countries outside OPEC is expected to show a steady<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease, from around 47 million barrels per day <strong>in</strong> 2002 to about 62 million<br />
barrels per day by 2025. Total world demand for oil is expected to reach 112<br />
million barrels per day by 2020 and 133 million by 2025. Develop<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong><br />
Asia show the largest projected growth <strong>in</strong> demand, averag<strong>in</strong>g 3.3 percent per<br />
year, ledby Ch<strong>in</strong>a at 3.9 percent per year.<br />
3.3.6 Persian Gulf Producers Took More Than Half of World Oil Trade<br />
Consider<strong>in</strong>g the world market <strong>in</strong> crude oil exports, the historical peak for<br />
Persian Gulf exports (as a percent of world oil exports) occurred <strong>in</strong> 1974, when<br />
64
they made up more than two-thirds of the crude oil traded <strong>in</strong> world markets. The<br />
most recent historical low for Persian Gulf oil exports came <strong>in</strong> 1984 as a result of<br />
more than a decade of high oil prices, which led to significant reductions <strong>in</strong><br />
worldwide petroleum consumption. Less than 40 percent of the crude oil traded<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1984 came from Persian Gulf suppliers. Follow<strong>in</strong>g the 1985 oil price collapse,<br />
the Persian Gulf export percentage aga<strong>in</strong> began a gradual <strong>in</strong>crease, but it leveled<br />
off <strong>in</strong> the 1990S at 40 to 45 percent when non-OPEC supply proved to be<br />
unexpectedly resilient.<br />
Persian Gulf producers are expected to account for 45 percent of<br />
worldwide trade by 2007-for the first time s<strong>in</strong>ce the early 1980s. After 2007, the<br />
Persian Gulf share of worldwide petroleum exports is projected to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
gradually to 66 percent by 2025. In the low oil price case, the Persian Gulf share<br />
of total exports is projected to reach 76 percent by 2025. All Persian Gulf<br />
producers are expected to <strong>in</strong>crease oil production capacity significantly over the<br />
forecast period, and both Saudi Arabia and Iraq (assum<strong>in</strong>g the lift<strong>in</strong>g of United<br />
Nations export sanctions after 2003) are expected to nearly triple their current<br />
production capacity.<br />
3.3.7 Asia/Pacific Region is Expected to Surpass U.S. Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Capacity<br />
The Asia/Pacific region was the fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g center <strong>in</strong> the<br />
1990s.1t surpassed Western Europe as the world's second largest ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g center<br />
and, <strong>in</strong> terms of distillation capacity, is expected to surpass North America before<br />
2005. While not add<strong>in</strong>g significantly to their distillation capacity, ref<strong>in</strong>ers <strong>in</strong> the<br />
United States and Europe have tended to improve product quality and enhance<br />
the usefulness of heavier oils through <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> downstream capacity.<br />
Future <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery operations of develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />
must <strong>in</strong>clude configurations that are more advanced than those currently <strong>in</strong><br />
operation. Their ref<strong>in</strong>eries will be called upon to meet <strong>in</strong>creased worldwide<br />
demand for lighter products, to upgrade residual fuel, to supply transportation<br />
fuels with reduced lead, and to supply both distillate and residual fuels with<br />
decreased sulfur levels. An additional burden on new ref<strong>in</strong>eries will be the need<br />
65
3.3.9 Logistics for <strong>Petroleum</strong> Products<br />
Transportation by ship and pipel<strong>in</strong>es are the two modes used <strong>in</strong> India for<br />
"<br />
Figure 3.10 <strong>Indian</strong> petroleum map<br />
J:<br />
'0<br />
the crude movement. Ship is the ma<strong>in</strong> mode of crude movement. Ship<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g is not that accurate <strong>in</strong> any part of the country. So the crude availability<br />
at any ref<strong>in</strong>ery, which depends on ship transport, cannot be planned correctly.<br />
This sometimes disturbs production. The demurrages are also high due to<br />
unplanned arrival of ships. Ports are also not hav<strong>in</strong>g most modern facilities. So<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g time is also higher at almost all the ports Rail, road, pipel<strong>in</strong>e and sea<br />
are the modes of conveyance for transport<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. Railway and road<br />
gives maximum service. Pipel<strong>in</strong>e supply is very limited. Pipel<strong>in</strong>e is used for<br />
supply<strong>in</strong>g to major <strong>in</strong>dustrial customers. Retail distribution is through road only.<br />
Rail wagons are used for bulk movement to areas where the direct supply by road<br />
is difficult because of distance. Wagons must be unloaded to tanks <strong>in</strong> the<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g yard and from there it is to be distributed by trucks to the retail<br />
outlets.<br />
67
Operat<strong>in</strong>g Cost<br />
70 10 so 100<br />
", + t-<br />
o 00 I-<br />
--_..<br />
Figure 3.11 Internal LOgIstICS costs InRef<strong>in</strong>ery Figure 3.12 Logistics Costs Vs capacity<br />
Ship can also be used to transport from ref<strong>in</strong>ery to coastal cities. This will<br />
be cheaper than rail and road transport. This facility is not be<strong>in</strong>g largely used <strong>in</strong><br />
India. It may require modification or modernization of exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities.<br />
Reliability of supply is not very good due to the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> rail and road<br />
transport. Movement of small quantities necessitates the need for frequent trips<br />
oftrucks and which <strong>in</strong> turn disturbs the scheduled movement. Operat<strong>in</strong>g cost of a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery is depended on through put of ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Through put is the crude oil<br />
processed by the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. If the through put is less than 60% of its <strong>in</strong>stalled<br />
capacity, operat<strong>in</strong>g cost will almost double at 20% of <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. Internal<br />
logistics costs are calculated by deduct<strong>in</strong>g operat<strong>in</strong>g costs from total production<br />
costs. Internal logistics costs are not available directly from any ref<strong>in</strong>ery data. So<br />
it is calculated as mentioned above and plotted aga<strong>in</strong>st the capacity of ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
As shown <strong>in</strong>figure 3.12 it is decreas<strong>in</strong>g almost l<strong>in</strong>early with <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. A<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery with 1.5 MMTPA has Rs. 60/tonne as logistics where as it is only Rs. 30<br />
for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery with 14MMTPA as <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery with high <strong>in</strong>stalled<br />
capacity willbe enjoy<strong>in</strong>g better <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics costs.<br />
3.3.10 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Objective<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> objective of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is meet<strong>in</strong>g product demand by produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sufficient volume of products. The product must be meet<strong>in</strong>g the specification laid<br />
by the Government. The <strong>in</strong>terest of ref<strong>in</strong>ery will be <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the cost of<br />
production to <strong>in</strong>crease the profit. In the decontrolled environment reduc<strong>in</strong>g cost<br />
of production will be essential to compete with imported products. <strong>Supply</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
products at the site ofcustomer to meet the demand is the ultimate objective of a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery to maximize their profit. Selection of crude oil is important because<br />
68<br />
"
transportation cost of crude oil is directly dependent on the distance of the<br />
load<strong>in</strong>g port. Sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> transportation can be treated as profit.<br />
• meet product demand<br />
crude • Make product on specification<br />
oil<br />
f------+ • M<strong>in</strong>imum cost Product<br />
feed • Maximum profit Demand<br />
stock<br />
Govt. of India is giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>centives for capacity utilization <strong>in</strong> full. So the<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries have been always try<strong>in</strong>g to maximize their throughput. This resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
achiev<strong>in</strong>g more than the designed maximum capacity. If a new product is<br />
produced or more volume of exist<strong>in</strong>g product is produced, it will be difficult to<br />
sell the product immediately after the production It will lead to unnecessary<br />
product hold<strong>in</strong>g. This is a difficult situation for many ref<strong>in</strong>eries because storage<br />
capacity is a bottleneck. More over it adds cost to the product. All these problems<br />
are aris<strong>in</strong>g because the companies are look<strong>in</strong>g only on the volume of production<br />
and capacity utilization.<br />
3.4 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Location Selection Model<br />
Location of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is important as far as logistics is concerned. Many<br />
factors have to be considered for site selection. The general facility location<br />
problem is very well discussed <strong>in</strong> literature. Details are available <strong>in</strong> Khumawala<br />
[1971], Klassen [1994], and MacCormek [1994]. The factors considered <strong>in</strong> the<br />
general location problem have to be prioritised for ref<strong>in</strong>ery site selection and<br />
other relevant factors added. Here a four stage decision model for ref<strong>in</strong>ery site<br />
selection is presented. In the first stage alternative locations are generated, <strong>in</strong> the<br />
second stage a Pass/ Fail criterion is applied to elim<strong>in</strong>ate sites not suitable, <strong>in</strong> the<br />
third stage a logistic cost comparison is done to rank the alternatives based on<br />
logistics cost. F<strong>in</strong>ally a few top rank alternatives are compared us<strong>in</strong>g weighted<br />
factor method to arrive the site to be selected.<br />
69
3.4.1 Generation of Alternatives<br />
Location of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery can be anywhere <strong>in</strong> the world because crude is<br />
transported from few parts of the world to the rest of the world. Transport<strong>in</strong>g<br />
crude oil is easier and cheaper than transport<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. To optimize<br />
the expense <strong>in</strong> transport, location of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery plays a vital role. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
location is the first step <strong>in</strong> the process. Important factors to be considered for the<br />
generation of alternatives for location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are :<br />
• Near source of crude oil<br />
• Port site<br />
• Pipel<strong>in</strong>e grid for crude oil<br />
• Presence of bulk <strong>in</strong>dustrial customers<br />
• Connectivityto rail<br />
• Highwayl<strong>in</strong>kages<br />
Nearness of port is very important because the bulk movement of crude oil<br />
and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products can take place only through sea. Companies, which are<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g to export products, will be able to do it through sea only. So the location<br />
must be near to the port. Crude oil has to be brought <strong>in</strong> large quantities to a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Ship is one commonly used mode of transport but pipel<strong>in</strong>e is much<br />
more cheaper. Lay<strong>in</strong>g a new l<strong>in</strong>e for ref<strong>in</strong>ery may not be economic and feasible.<br />
Sett<strong>in</strong>g up ref<strong>in</strong>ery near an exist<strong>in</strong>g crude oil pipel<strong>in</strong>e will be a more economic<br />
alternative. So the nearness to the pipel<strong>in</strong>e grid is an important factor for<br />
select<strong>in</strong>g the location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Nearness or access to supply is essential.<br />
Similarly access to customers, especially<strong>in</strong>dustrial customers s<strong>in</strong>ce they consume<br />
bulk quantities, is also important. Nearness to railhead also must be considered<br />
because it is the cheapest mode of conveyance on land. It will be essential to<br />
move the products <strong>in</strong> wagons also. Highwayl<strong>in</strong>kage is also vital for supply<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
the customers <strong>in</strong> the nearby places.<br />
3.4.2 Pass I Fail Criteria<br />
Identification of alternative location process for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery will provide a<br />
lot of sites. For select<strong>in</strong>g the right location each location must be checked first<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st some critical factors like environmental regulations, taxes by<br />
Governments, availability of water, availability of land etc. Locations which are<br />
70
fail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> these factors must be removed. Ifa government does not give license for<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries then any location <strong>in</strong> the state or the nation cannot be selected. So such<br />
locationfail <strong>in</strong> the test and must be removed from the list.<br />
3.4.3 Cost Comparison Us<strong>in</strong>g Spread Sheet<br />
Major cost components <strong>in</strong> logistics are <strong>in</strong>bound logistic cost, production<br />
cost and outbound logistic cost. In the selection of location problem, process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cost can be avoided because it is constant. M<strong>in</strong>imum distance for transport<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ed products is taken as 50 km because the chance of complete distribution of<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ed products with<strong>in</strong> 50 km is almost impossible. Expense for multiples of<br />
each fifty km is used for calculation. Sum of <strong>in</strong>bound logistic cost and outbound<br />
logistic cost for each location is calculated us<strong>in</strong>g spreadsheet and the list of<br />
location is made <strong>in</strong> the ascend<strong>in</strong>g order.<br />
Factors<br />
Cost<br />
Factors<br />
Pass I Fail Criterion<br />
Cost Comparison<br />
Weightage allocation<br />
Pass<br />
Cost below uooer limit<br />
Highest<br />
Fail<br />
Cost above upper limit<br />
Low Weightage<br />
fiaure 3.13 Model for Location Selection<br />
Cut off on the list can be 50% higher than the least cost. Reason for fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the 50% higher is that it should not cross the least when other criterion is<br />
applied. Selection of alternatives at this stage can be made by select<strong>in</strong>g first n<br />
numbers. For example first 5 locations can be selected from the total selected<br />
locations. These five locations will be considered for further detailed analysis.<br />
71
3.4.4 Scheme for Cost Calculation<br />
Pipel<strong>in</strong>e has only capital <strong>in</strong>vestment as the major component. Operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cost is the least. Transportation cost can be calculated <strong>in</strong> rupees per tonne per<br />
kilometer. Total cost of transportation can be taken as Rs.X. Shipp<strong>in</strong>g charges for<br />
crude as well as for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products can be calculated on the basis of distance<br />
multiplied with rate <strong>in</strong> rupees per tonne per kilometer. Port charges per tonne<br />
must be added to it separately because port charges vary from port to port. Total<br />
ofshipcharges can be taken as Rs.Y. Railwaycharges can be calculated by add<strong>in</strong>g<br />
fixed m<strong>in</strong>imum charge for an order with the cost of transport<strong>in</strong>g per tonne per<br />
kilometer. Total can be taken as Rs.Z for railway. Road transport cost can be<br />
calculated on the basis of distance transported per tone per kilometer. M<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
charge is fixed for transport<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> 50 kilometers from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Total cost<br />
oftransportation us<strong>in</strong>g truck can be taken as Rs.W. Us<strong>in</strong>g this method <strong>in</strong>bound<br />
variable logistic costs and outbound logistics costs can be used for the screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
oflocations primarily selected. Table 3.15 gives the method of calculation for each<br />
location. For example, a location <strong>in</strong> south will be hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>bound and outbound<br />
logistics costs. Inbound logistic cost <strong>in</strong>volves pipel<strong>in</strong>e and shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
transportation costs (X+Y). Outbound logistics cost <strong>in</strong>volves pipel<strong>in</strong>e + sea + rail<br />
+ road and the sum of all <strong>in</strong>dividual costs is the total outbound logistics cost.<br />
Grant total is the sum of <strong>in</strong>bound and outbound logistics cost. Total cost can be<br />
compared and decision can be taken for select<strong>in</strong>g the number of locations for<br />
detailed analysis.<br />
Table 3.15 Cost comparison us<strong>in</strong>g Spreadsheet<br />
SI. No. Location (nbound Cost Outbound Cost Total Cost<br />
1 South X+Y X+Y+Z+W 2X+2Y+Z+W<br />
2 North X+Y X+Y+Z+W 2X+2Y+Z+W<br />
3 East X+Y X+Y+Z+W 2X+2Y+Z+W<br />
4 West X+Y X+Y+Z+W 2X+2Y+Z+W<br />
5 Middle X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />
6 Middle East X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />
7 Middle South X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />
8 Middle West X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />
9 Middle North X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />
72
3.4.5 Factors for Selection of Location<br />
Factor comparison method is commonly adopted for selection of location<br />
for <strong>in</strong>dustrial units. Francis [1992] and Ritzman [1990] have suggested<br />
procedures for identify<strong>in</strong>g location. Same method with additional features is<br />
used for identify<strong>in</strong>g important factors as far as a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is concerned. General<br />
Factors for location selection for an <strong>in</strong>dustry are discussed below.<br />
• Availability of Land<br />
• Cost of land<br />
• Transportation facility<br />
• Availability of labour<br />
• VVagesforlabour<br />
• Information Technology<br />
• Availability of power and water<br />
• Support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
• Quality of life like school, hospital<br />
• Nearness to market<br />
• Build<strong>in</strong>g of site<br />
• Availability of Skilled employees like manager<br />
• Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for workers and foreman<br />
• Security<br />
• Expansion of site<br />
• Taxes<br />
• Government support<br />
• Union problem and <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations<br />
• Environmental relations<br />
• VVaste disposal<br />
• Location of sub contractors, retailers etc.<br />
• Incentives form f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
• Climatic conditions<br />
All these factors are not important for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Factors, which are<br />
important for the site selection of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, are found out <strong>in</strong> discussion with<br />
senior people <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Procedure is discussed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> next section. The<br />
selected factors are given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.16. The selected factors from the full list are<br />
reduced to n<strong>in</strong>e and they are assigned with weightage <strong>in</strong> Table 3.17 and these<br />
factors areused for further analysis.<br />
73
One day's journey 80
more than 50 percentage of the participants were taken as score. In majority of<br />
the factors more than 90% were hav<strong>in</strong>g the same op<strong>in</strong>ion. There was a variation<br />
of 10% <strong>in</strong> the op<strong>in</strong>ion collected from the participants. For the eas<strong>in</strong>ess of<br />
calculation it was neglected. Selection was made by the participant on the table<br />
given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.16. After consolidat<strong>in</strong>g the scores, codes were assigned to each<br />
factor. Code 'A' for nearness of raw material was assigned and 'B' for security. All<br />
the factors were given the codes as given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.16. Same group of people<br />
were assigned with the task of giv<strong>in</strong>g the pair wise comparison. In this case the<br />
variation was only 9%. Those values are tabulated <strong>in</strong> Table 3.19. Three choices<br />
were given for the selection. They are m<strong>in</strong>or, medium, and major. As shown <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 3.18, 'A' is compared with 'B' and the value will be entered <strong>in</strong> the column of<br />
'B'. In the case the nearness of material is major when compared with security<br />
and 93% of the participants were of the same op<strong>in</strong>ion. So '1\3" is assigned <strong>in</strong><br />
column of 'B' aga<strong>in</strong>st the row of 'A'. Similarly 'A' is compared with C,D,E,F,G,H,<br />
and I. Same procedure was cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> the case of all the factors. After mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
all the entries it used for calculat<strong>in</strong>g weightages. Number of correspond<strong>in</strong>g values<br />
<strong>in</strong> each square aga<strong>in</strong>st each factor was added up to get the value <strong>in</strong> column of<br />
score. Values of the same factor only were used for the calculation. In the row of<br />
'A', valuesof 'A' only was considered for the calculation of score. Value of 'F' was<br />
not used for calculation. In the case of score for 'F', first values of 'F' <strong>in</strong> the<br />
column was added and that value was added with the sum values <strong>in</strong> the row of 'F'.<br />
Scores of all the factors are calculated <strong>in</strong> this way. Total of all those scores were<br />
calculated to f<strong>in</strong>d out the weightages. Total value of the scores of the factors was<br />
calculated as 78. Percentage weightage was calculated by divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
factor scorewith total factor score.<br />
After the completion of allocation of scores <strong>in</strong> the matrix the total<br />
score (Si) aga<strong>in</strong>st each factor score is calculated. Score values <strong>in</strong> the rows and<br />
columns are added to get the f<strong>in</strong>al score. For example<br />
76
Score of C = [Sum of scores <strong>in</strong> Column» 2+Sum of row = 2+2+2 = 6 ]2+6=8 and<br />
Score ofF= [Sum ofscores <strong>in</strong> Column 2+3+2+3 = 10+ Sum ofraw=1+3=4]= 10+4 =14<br />
Sum of scores (LSi) is calculated to f<strong>in</strong>d out percentage weight.<br />
Percentageweight = Wi = Si / LSi<br />
Forexample Percentage weight of factor A = 17/78 = 0.218<br />
Table 3.19 Preference Matrixes<br />
A B C 0 E F G H I<br />
Score<br />
(Si)<br />
%wt(Wi)<br />
A A3 A1 A3 A3 F2 A2 2 3 17 0.218<br />
8 C2 81 83 F3 G1 H2 11 4 0.052<br />
C C2 C2 F2 G2 H1 C2 8 0.102<br />
0 03 F3 G2 H2 12 3 0.038<br />
E E2 G2 H3 12 2 0.026<br />
F F1 F3 11 14 0.179<br />
G H2 11 7 0.090<br />
H H3 13 0.167<br />
I 10 0.128<br />
78 1.00<br />
After calculat<strong>in</strong>g Wi of each factor, the locations under consideration were<br />
tabulated as given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.19. Locations are considered with respect to each<br />
factor. Location I is considered for Factor Al (nearness to raw material) and<br />
weightage is given on loo-po<strong>in</strong>t scale. For m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g subjectivity, nearness to<br />
raw material is divided <strong>in</strong>to five classes and weightages are given. Table 3.17gives<br />
the detailed guide l<strong>in</strong>es for assign<strong>in</strong>g weightage for each factor. Selection of<br />
weightage was done on the basis of <strong>in</strong>terviews and discussions with senior level<br />
people <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>eries. In this example the value of A is 70 (ail), value of B is 80<br />
(aiz) and so on. Then the value of A was multiplied by its percentage weightage<br />
(0.218).<br />
77
Flexibility for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is essential because (1) demand pattern changes,<br />
(zjprice changes, (3)possibility of develop<strong>in</strong>g substitute fuels, (4)possibility of<br />
new market like new solvent, and(s) political <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>in</strong> some crude supply<strong>in</strong>g<br />
countries. Demand pattern changes due to changes <strong>in</strong> climate or changes <strong>in</strong><br />
production pattern <strong>in</strong> consumer <strong>in</strong>dustries or political reasons. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be<br />
able to adjust with changes <strong>in</strong> the market. This will reduce the <strong>in</strong>ventory. Ifrigid<br />
production pattern is adopted, possibility for hold<strong>in</strong>g of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products also will<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease. Price of crude oil as well as ref<strong>in</strong>ed products changes <strong>in</strong> the market.<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be flexible to accommodate the changes and to <strong>in</strong>crease the profit.<br />
Possibility of substitute fuels like alcohol or liquefied natural gas may lead to<br />
reduction <strong>in</strong> demand for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. To <strong>in</strong>crease profitability, ref<strong>in</strong>ery must<br />
be able to change the product mix to cope up with the product demand. Demand<br />
for new products may come up <strong>in</strong> the market. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be competent to<br />
cater to the demand for new products also, or else some other ref<strong>in</strong>eries will<br />
supply the product. It is not good <strong>in</strong> a competitive market. Political <strong>in</strong>stabilities<br />
also can change the crude supply. So ref<strong>in</strong>ery must have facilities to process<br />
variety of crude oil to withstand the changes <strong>in</strong> demand. Flexibility to the<br />
maximum possible level will <strong>in</strong>crease the freedom to select crude oil and supply<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ed products to any market.<br />
Figure 3.14 Relationship diagram<br />
79
Figure 3.14 illustrates how flexibility, <strong>in</strong>ventories, and customer service<br />
are <strong>in</strong>terrelated. The components of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g flexibility play an important<br />
role <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> flexibility. However, as the supply cha<strong>in</strong> extends beyond the<br />
enterprise, supply cha<strong>in</strong> flexibility must also extend beyond one firm's <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
flexibility. Most of the responsibility for one type of flexibility lies with<strong>in</strong> one<br />
functional area of a particular firm. In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery production department is<br />
generally responsible for volume flexibility, market<strong>in</strong>g is generally responsible for<br />
distribution flexibility, laboratory is responsible for new production <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />
flexibility etc. Byfocus<strong>in</strong>g on the flexibilityfrom an <strong>in</strong>ternal perspective, much of<br />
theconcentration on supply cha<strong>in</strong> perspective is lost. Figure 3.15 shows the major<br />
components of logistic flexibility for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery from facility po<strong>in</strong>t of view. Each<br />
component is expla<strong>in</strong>ed below.<br />
3.5.2 Oil Field Flexibility<br />
Crude oil is available <strong>in</strong> different parts of the world <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g India as<br />
shown <strong>in</strong> Table 3.21. Crude oil available at all the places are not of the same<br />
quality. Gravity and sulfur content of crude oil ma<strong>in</strong>ly decide quality. Table 3.19<br />
shows the quality of crude oil at different oil fields.<br />
Table 3.21 Oil and condensate <strong>in</strong> billion barrel<br />
Region<br />
Cumulative<br />
production so far<br />
Total discovered<br />
North America 238 277<br />
Lat<strong>in</strong> America 101 177<br />
Europe 40 77<br />
North Africa 43 88<br />
C/S Africa 27 59<br />
Middle East 218 742<br />
Far east Australial<br />
Asia<br />
59 144<br />
CIS 128 297<br />
Opec 330 941<br />
Non -Opec 524 890<br />
World 854 1831<br />
Selection of crude is not only dependent on the quality but also the<br />
distance of oil field from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, process<strong>in</strong>g capability of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery and<br />
product demand <strong>in</strong> the market. For improv<strong>in</strong>g productivity and profit crude oil<br />
81
carriers must be employed for transportation. So standard types of ref<strong>in</strong>eries will<br />
not have capacity to receive and stock crude oil brought by Suez Max ships.<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>eries can share this by lighter<strong>in</strong>g crude oil to small ships. So the flexibility <strong>in</strong><br />
availability of different quantity can be enjoyed by small ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />
'"<br />
Table 3.23 Crude oil properties atdifferent locations<br />
Country<br />
MIDDLE EAST<br />
Abu Dhabi<br />
Abu Dhabi<br />
Abu Dhabi<br />
Abu Dhabi<br />
Divided zone<br />
Divided zone<br />
E t<br />
Iran<br />
Iran<br />
Ira<br />
Ira<br />
Kuwait<br />
Oman<br />
Qatar<br />
Qatar<br />
Saudi Arabia<br />
Saudi Arabia<br />
Saudi Arabia<br />
Saudi Arabia<br />
Kole Mar<strong>in</strong>e blend<br />
Mand'j<br />
Bonn Li ht<br />
Bonn Medium<br />
Brass river<br />
Forcados Blend<br />
Qua Iboe<br />
83<br />
Gravity<br />
o API<br />
40.5 0.78<br />
37.5 1.51<br />
40.6 1.05<br />
31.1 2.00<br />
32.8 1.91<br />
28.5 2.85<br />
31.9 1.52<br />
31.0 1.65<br />
33.8 1.35<br />
33.7 1.95<br />
35.1 1.97<br />
31.4 2.52<br />
36.3 0.79<br />
41.7 1.28<br />
35.3 1.57<br />
27.9 2.85<br />
33.4 1.79<br />
37.8 1.19<br />
30.8 2.40<br />
34.9<br />
30.5<br />
36.7<br />
25.2<br />
40.9<br />
29.7<br />
35.8
Country Crude Gravity 0 Sulfur<br />
API Wt%<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Indonesia<br />
Sumatra<br />
Sumatra<br />
Common wealth of<br />
Inde endent states<br />
Saharan Blend<br />
Zarzaita<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Amna<br />
Bre a<br />
Es Sider<br />
Sarir<br />
Sirtica<br />
Zueit<strong>in</strong>a<br />
3.5.5 Crude Oil Storage Flexibility<br />
45.5<br />
43.0<br />
36.1<br />
40.4<br />
36.7<br />
38.3<br />
43.3<br />
33.4<br />
21.1<br />
34.5<br />
32.5<br />
0.53<br />
0.07<br />
0.15<br />
0.21<br />
0.37<br />
0.18<br />
0.43<br />
0.08<br />
0.20<br />
0.08<br />
1.38<br />
Crude oil can be stored <strong>in</strong> storage tanks <strong>in</strong> the tank farm of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. It<br />
can also be stored <strong>in</strong> float<strong>in</strong>g tanks <strong>in</strong> outer sea also. Tanks can be connected to<br />
one tank to another so that crude oil can be pumped from each other. The<br />
flexibility <strong>in</strong> storage reduces the storage capacity requirement for crude oil, which<br />
<strong>in</strong> turn reduces capital <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />
3.5.6 Process Flexibility<br />
Normal ref<strong>in</strong>eries cannot process all variety of crude oils <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
distillation column. M<strong>in</strong>imum two distillation columns are required for<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g low sulfur and high sulfur crude oils. A good ref<strong>in</strong>ery must have<br />
84
flexibility <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g a large variety of crude oils. Quality is the other area,<br />
which requires flexibility. Product demand decides the crude oil to be processed.<br />
This reduces the variety of crude oils that can be purchased. The flexibility for<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g any type of crude <strong>in</strong> any quantity will improve the profitability of<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
3.5.7 Intermediate Storage Flexibility<br />
Transferr<strong>in</strong>g from first distillation column to f<strong>in</strong>al processes is not always<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous. So <strong>in</strong>termediate storage tanks are essential to store the products<br />
wait<strong>in</strong>g for further process<strong>in</strong>g to upgrade the product. The flexibility can be<br />
improved by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the capacity and <strong>in</strong>terconnection between tanks. Capacity<br />
<strong>in</strong>crements can be <strong>in</strong> terms of number of tanks rather than a few number of large<br />
size tanks. Variety of products can be <strong>in</strong>creased by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
storage. This will improve productivity of ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
3.5.8 F<strong>in</strong>al Process Flexibility<br />
Technologyfor any process is available <strong>in</strong> the market. Selection of process<br />
like super oil crack<strong>in</strong>g (SaC), Hydro crack<strong>in</strong>g, reform<strong>in</strong>g etc. decides the product<br />
variety and quality. The higher the variety and quality, the better will be the ga<strong>in</strong>.<br />
By add<strong>in</strong>g different processes, required type of products can be produced. All the<br />
variety of products produced need not have sufficient market. Increased<br />
flexibility <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al process will make a ref<strong>in</strong>ery equipped to produce high value<br />
products <strong>in</strong> the desired volume. It will <strong>in</strong>crease profitability of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
3.5.9 Stream Storage Flexibility<br />
Products runn<strong>in</strong>g out of distillation columns without any addition to it are<br />
called stream. Keep<strong>in</strong>g them may help <strong>in</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g the product specifications.<br />
Facility for storage of this stream will improve product variety, which will <strong>in</strong> turn<br />
satisfy customer <strong>in</strong> a better way. Different tanks must be provided for stor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
different streams and <strong>in</strong>terconnectivity is desirable for better capacity utilization.<br />
3.5.10 Blend<strong>in</strong>g Flexibility<br />
In the short term, tighten<strong>in</strong>g fuel specifications may result <strong>in</strong> a bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
hedache, but <strong>in</strong> the long run it will open up new market<strong>in</strong>g opportunities.<br />
85
Blend<strong>in</strong>g is the process of mix<strong>in</strong>g different streams to get desired specification of<br />
a product. Product blend<strong>in</strong>g area is receiv<strong>in</strong>g much attention by many ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
aroundthe world. Follow<strong>in</strong>g are the ma<strong>in</strong> reasons.<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g is the area that is best understood <strong>in</strong> terms of qualified benefits<br />
from improvement.<br />
Traditional blend<strong>in</strong>g has required a significant number of dedicated tanks.<br />
As demand pattern changes, opportunity sales may be very profiTable.<br />
Accommodat<strong>in</strong>g opportunity sales may well place severe stra<strong>in</strong> on the f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />
product tankage and associated load<strong>in</strong>g facilities.<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g requires a significant amount of manpower support, both off site<br />
andlaboratory manpower.<br />
The major types of blend<strong>in</strong>g are batch blend<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Add<strong>in</strong>g streams to a tank conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a product does batch blend<strong>in</strong>g. Quantity of<br />
addition of new stream as directed from the laboratory depends upon the<br />
specifications of the product <strong>in</strong> the tank.<br />
In l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g is done at the time of either fill<strong>in</strong>g the tank or while<br />
pump<strong>in</strong>g to the tanker. Four types of <strong>in</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>in</strong> practice.<br />
• Component to f<strong>in</strong>ished product<br />
• Component to load<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Rundown to f<strong>in</strong>ished product/ load<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Rundown to base<br />
Depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the demand for the variety of the product, anyone of the<br />
above methods can be used for blend<strong>in</strong>g. Anyway batch blend<strong>in</strong>g can be<br />
employed if the market<strong>in</strong>g is limited to local market. Flexibility <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g can<br />
be employed only through <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the variety of product, which can be<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed by delay<strong>in</strong>g blend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
3.5.11 F<strong>in</strong>al Product Storage Flexibility<br />
Blended stream with accurate specification is called f<strong>in</strong>al product. This is<br />
ready to market and will have assured demand. In the f<strong>in</strong>al product, quantity can<br />
be flexible. Fast mov<strong>in</strong>g items with standard specification can be stored as<br />
86
products to improve the speed of delivery. It is difficult to store all the variety<br />
products <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al product storage tanks. Less mov<strong>in</strong>g and special products can<br />
be blended at the time of load<strong>in</strong>g to reduce the <strong>in</strong>ventory level. Demand for<br />
number of tanks will be high for stor<strong>in</strong>g all the products as products. To <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
flexibility the variety of f<strong>in</strong>al products stored must be the m<strong>in</strong>imum. Maximize<br />
the volume of fast mov<strong>in</strong>g products to improve flexibility.<br />
3.5.12 Outbound Transportation Flexibility<br />
Transportation of products from ref<strong>in</strong>ery to retail outlet or customer is<br />
known as outbound transportation. Pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship, wagon, and trucks are the<br />
commonly used modes of transport. Pipel<strong>in</strong>e can be used for supply<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
customers who buy huge quantities on regular basis or to distribution station at a<br />
distant places. This is the most economic mode of conveyance. Pipel<strong>in</strong>es are<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g used to supply LPG for domestic consumption also <strong>in</strong> metropolitan cities<br />
like Mumbai. Ship is used for transport<strong>in</strong>g product to far off places <strong>in</strong> the country<br />
or for export<strong>in</strong>g. In India products are not exported because our domestic<br />
production is not even sufficient for <strong>in</strong>ternal use. Only constra<strong>in</strong>t of ship<br />
transport is the need for port on both ends. So this is feasible for coastal<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries and coastal cities. Rail can be used for transport<strong>in</strong>g petroleum products<br />
from ref<strong>in</strong>ery to another city, which is far off from sea or port. Quantities of<br />
movement will be less because of the capacity limits of locomotives and load<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and unload<strong>in</strong>g facility constra<strong>in</strong>ts. If the railway system is not efficient, it will<br />
take moretime to move products when compared to ship. Ifship is not accessible<br />
then railis the best option for bulk transport. Trucks are mostly used to move the<br />
product from distribution center to retail outlet. 70km is normally seen as<br />
maximum limit for economic road transport. Profitability will be lesser if the<br />
distance is more than 70 km. The distance is a matter of demand also. If the<br />
demand is less, def<strong>in</strong>itely road will be better option because the capital<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment is m<strong>in</strong>imum. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery must have flexibility <strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g any mode of<br />
transport. For better profitability a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of all modes of transport must be<br />
possible <strong>in</strong> any ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
87
Table 3.24 Flexibility areas and theirimpacts<br />
Flexibility area Key factors Impact<br />
Oil field<br />
Sulfur Content<br />
Specific Gravity<br />
Less production cost<br />
Lighter products<br />
Ship size Less cost<br />
Inbound Transport Distance Moe quantity<br />
Pump<strong>in</strong>Q rate Fast discharge<br />
Availability Less cost<br />
Crude supply Price Fast movement<br />
Transport cost Less <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
Crude storage<br />
Tank connectivity<br />
Types ofcrude<br />
Less <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
Better schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Variety ofcrude More products<br />
Process Availability ofcrude Less <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
Capacity Better capacity utilisation<br />
Connectivity between tanks Better utilization oftanks<br />
Intermediate storage<br />
Size oftanks<br />
Variety ofproducts<br />
Quantity ofproducts<br />
More products<br />
More flexible process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Technology adopted Flexibility <strong>in</strong> crude<br />
F<strong>in</strong>al process Investment capacity High value products<br />
Better netback<br />
Stream storage<br />
Connectivity between tanks<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g practice<br />
More variety ofproducts<br />
Less tankage<br />
Type ofblend<strong>in</strong>g Less tank capacity<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Product specification<br />
Variety ofproducts<br />
More variety ofproducts<br />
Flexibilty <strong>in</strong> product<br />
specification<br />
Specification ofproducts Customer satisfaction<br />
Product storage<br />
Type ofblend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Variety ofproducts<br />
Availability ofmore<br />
products<br />
Better process control<br />
Mode oftransport available Fast delivery<br />
Outbound transport<br />
Cost ofeach mode<br />
Location ofref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Demand ofQuantity<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> to any market<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> ofany quantity<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g procedure Increased product variety<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> Product storage Increased product quantity<br />
Transportation <strong>Supply</strong> to any location<br />
Storage capacity Service Increased customer<br />
Retailer<br />
Information Technology satisfaction<br />
Faster <strong>in</strong>formation to<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
3.5.13 Product Demand Flexibility<br />
A good ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be able to supply any quantity of product as per the<br />
specification given by the customer. This can be atta<strong>in</strong>ed only by the comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
88
of flexibility <strong>in</strong> blend<strong>in</strong>g, f<strong>in</strong>al product storage and transportation. <strong>Supply</strong><br />
flexibility will improve customer satisfaction and brand loyalty.<br />
3.5.14 Distribution Channel Flexibility<br />
Retail outlets-br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g product from ref<strong>in</strong>ery and distributes- is termed<br />
supplier. The supplier at each area must be able to sell products with<br />
specification suiTable for that area. For example the outlets at high ranges must<br />
beable to supply diesel with low cetane number to have better ignition but cetane<br />
number can be high <strong>in</strong> cities and level roads to reduce the possibility of fire at the<br />
time of accident. Facilities at each supplier must be similar so that the customer<br />
will not feel any difference between places. By us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology<br />
customers can be given the freedom to enjoy card facility and help l<strong>in</strong>es also. The<br />
flexibility will improve customer loyalty and <strong>in</strong> turn will improve profitability of a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
3.6 Process Selection for an Oil Ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> India<br />
A ref<strong>in</strong>ery is a factory just as a paper mill, which turns lumber <strong>in</strong>to legal<br />
pads or a glasswork, which turns silica <strong>in</strong>to stemware. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery takes a raw<br />
material-crude oil--and transforms it <strong>in</strong>to gasol<strong>in</strong>e and hundreds of other useful<br />
products. A typical large ref<strong>in</strong>ery costs billions of dollars to build and millions<br />
more to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> and upgrade. It runs around the clock 365 days a year, employs<br />
between 1,000 to 2,000 people and occupies as much land as several hundred<br />
football fields. Today, some ref<strong>in</strong>eries can turn more than half of every 42-gallon<br />
barrel of crude oil <strong>in</strong>to gasol<strong>in</strong>e. That's a remarkable technological improvement<br />
from 70 years ago, when only 11 gallons of gasol<strong>in</strong>e could be produced from a<br />
barrel of crude oil. How does this transformation take place? Essentially, ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
breaks crude oil down <strong>in</strong>to its various components, which then are selectively<br />
reconfigured <strong>in</strong>to new products. The complexity of this equipment varies from<br />
one ref<strong>in</strong>ery to the next. In general, the more sophisticated a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the better<br />
its ability to upgrade crude oil <strong>in</strong>to high-value products. Whether simple or<br />
complex, however, all ref<strong>in</strong>eries perform three basic steps: separation, conversion<br />
and treatment.<br />
89
3.6.1 Separation: Heavy on Bottom, Light on Top<br />
Modern separation, which is not much different from the "cook<strong>in</strong>g"<br />
methods used at the Pico Canyon stills, <strong>in</strong>volves pip<strong>in</strong>g oil through hot furnaces.<br />
The result<strong>in</strong>g liquids and vapors are discharged <strong>in</strong>to distillation towers. The tall<br />
narrow columns give ref<strong>in</strong>eries their dist<strong>in</strong>ctive skyl<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Inside the towers, the liquids and vapours separate <strong>in</strong>to components or<br />
fractions accord<strong>in</strong>g to weight and boil<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t. The lightest fractions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
gasol<strong>in</strong>e and liquid petroleum gas (LPG), vaporize and rise to the top of the<br />
tower, where they condense back to liquids. Medium weight liquids, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
kerosene and diesel oil distillates, stay <strong>in</strong> the middle. Heavier liquids, called gas<br />
oils, separate lower down, while the heaviest fractions with the highest boil<strong>in</strong>g<br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts settle at the bottom. These tar like fractions, called residuum, are<br />
literally the 'bottom of the barrel'. The fractions now are ready for pip<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
next station or plant with<strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Some components require relatively<br />
little additional process<strong>in</strong>g to become asphalt base or jet fuel. However, most<br />
molecules that are dest<strong>in</strong>ed to become high-value products require much more<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g. This is where ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g's fanciest footwork takes place-where fractions<br />
from the distillation towers are transformed <strong>in</strong>to streams (<strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
components) that eventually become f<strong>in</strong>ished products. This is where a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
makes money, because only through conversion can most low-value fractions<br />
become gasol<strong>in</strong>e. The most widely used conversion method is called crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
because it uses heat and pressure to "crack" heavy hydrocarbon molecules <strong>in</strong>to<br />
lighter ones. A crack<strong>in</strong>g unit consists of one or more tall, thick-walled, bullet<br />
shaped reactors and a network of furnaces, heat exchangers and other vessels.<br />
Fluid catalytic crack<strong>in</strong>g, or "cat crack<strong>in</strong>g," is the basic gasol<strong>in</strong>e-mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
process. Us<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>tense heat (about 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit), low pressure and a<br />
powdered catalyst (a substance that accelerates chemical reactions), the cat<br />
cracker can convert most relatively heavy fractions <strong>in</strong>to smaller gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />
molecules. Hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g applies the same pr<strong>in</strong>ciples but uses a different<br />
catalyst, slightly lower temperatures, much greater pressure and hydrogen to<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> chemical reactions. Although not all ref<strong>in</strong>eries employ hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Chevron is an <strong>in</strong>dustry leader <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g this technology to cost-effectively convert<br />
90
medium- to heavyweight gas oils <strong>in</strong>to high-value streams. The company's<br />
patented hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g process, which takes place <strong>in</strong> the Isocracker unit,<br />
produces mostly gasol<strong>in</strong>e and jet fuel.<br />
Some Chevron ref<strong>in</strong>eries also have cokers, which use heat and moderate<br />
pressure to turn residuum <strong>in</strong>to lighter products and a hard, coal like substance<br />
that is used as an <strong>in</strong>dustrial fuel. Cokers are among the more peculiar-look<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery structures. They resemble a series of giant drums with metal derricks on<br />
top. Crack<strong>in</strong>g and cok<strong>in</strong>g are not the only forms of conversion. Other ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
processes, <strong>in</strong>stead of splitt<strong>in</strong>g molecules, rearrange them to add value.<br />
Alkylation, for example, makes gasol<strong>in</strong>e components by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g some of the<br />
gaseous byproducts of crack<strong>in</strong>g. The process, which essentially is crack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
reverse, takes place <strong>in</strong> a series of large, horizontal vessels and tall, sk<strong>in</strong>ny towers<br />
that loom above other ref<strong>in</strong>ery structures. Reform<strong>in</strong>g uses heat, moderate<br />
pressure and catalysts to turn naphtha, a light, relatively low-value fraction, <strong>in</strong>to<br />
high-octane gasol<strong>in</strong>e components<br />
3.6.2 Treatment: the f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g touch<br />
A major portion of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves blend<strong>in</strong>g, purify<strong>in</strong>g, f<strong>in</strong>e-tun<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
otherwise improv<strong>in</strong>g products to meet the requirements.<br />
To make gasol<strong>in</strong>e, ref<strong>in</strong>ery technicians carefully comb<strong>in</strong>e a variety of<br />
streams from the process<strong>in</strong>g units. Among the variables that determ<strong>in</strong>e the blend<br />
are octane level, vapor pressure rat<strong>in</strong>gs and special considerations, such as<br />
whether the gasol<strong>in</strong>e will be used at high altitudes. Technicians also add dyes that<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guish the various grades of fuel.<br />
3.6.3 Classification of Ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
Atmospheric distillation is the first processes <strong>in</strong> crude oil process<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
different basic streams are separated from the crude oil. While the available<br />
crude oil becomes heavier (high sulfur) and there is decreas<strong>in</strong>g demand for fuel<br />
oil, new technologies are to be adopted for reduction of the bottom of the barrel.<br />
The bottom of the barrel is low quality and less demand<strong>in</strong>g products, three up<br />
gradation routes are available for bottom residue. They are<br />
91
1. Carbon Rejection<br />
• Delayed cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Visbreak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Fluid cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Flexi Cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Residue fractional catalyst crack<strong>in</strong>g (FCC)<br />
Table 3.25 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery upgradation options<br />
Upgrad<strong>in</strong>g Processes<br />
Isomerisation<br />
i. Naptha Catalystic Reform<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Petrochemical option<br />
ii. Distillate Desulphurisation<br />
Vacuum Distillation<br />
Vacuum gasoil desulfurisation<br />
iii. Vacuum Gas oil<br />
FCCU Hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Lube oil base stocks<br />
Visbreak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Solvent Deasphatt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Delayed cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Flexi cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />
iv. Residue Resid catalysitic crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Hydro-treat<strong>in</strong>g (Atm &Vacuum)<br />
Vacuum resid Hydro-crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Gassification<br />
Power generation<br />
Alkalisation<br />
Poly Naptha<br />
v. Light Oilf<strong>in</strong> Ethrification<br />
Petrochemicals<br />
Deep catalysitic Crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
11. Hydrogen addition<br />
• Hydro treat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Hydro ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Hydro crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Ill. Physical separation<br />
• Solvent Deasphalt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Table 3.25 shows possible ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g upgradation options. No s<strong>in</strong>gle optional<br />
configuration exists which can be directly adopted for all ref<strong>in</strong>ery configurations.<br />
The configuration is to be decided on the basis of market demand of products and<br />
supply of crude oil. For example <strong>in</strong> US, FCC units and cocker is considered as<br />
better option because of heavier crude slates and high gasol<strong>in</strong>e and high residual<br />
fuel oil demand. In Europe, because of the availability of the fuel oil outlets,<br />
thermal crack<strong>in</strong>g is substituted for cok<strong>in</strong>g. In Japan, hydro-desulfurisation<br />
92
capacity for long residue is substantial because of low sulphur fuel oil market.<br />
Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g selection of residue up gradation technology are <strong>in</strong>vestment,<br />
product pattern, return on <strong>in</strong>vestment etc. These are the methods for maximum<br />
upgradation but it may not be economic to go for full upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of residue. The<br />
optimumprocesses configurations are given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.25<br />
3.6.4 Classification of Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> Context<br />
From March 31, 2002 all petroleum products except LPG and Kerosene<br />
has been totally deregulated with the freedom to import ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. In<br />
these years India is go<strong>in</strong>g to face huge deficit of petroleum products particularly<br />
middle distillates. To meet the large gap between supply and demand,<br />
Government of India has taken measures to expand the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> the<br />
country. The capacity is expected to <strong>in</strong>crease from present 112MMTPA to<br />
150MMTPA by 2010,which is a great challenge to the <strong>in</strong>dustry. Exist<strong>in</strong>g as well as<br />
new entrants, will have to expand and / or build ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Industry is also to face<br />
change of adopt<strong>in</strong>g newer technologies to meet <strong>in</strong>creased requirement of middle<br />
distillates and environmental regulations for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery operations as well as<br />
product quality. In this regard, follow<strong>in</strong>g aspects are important.<br />
• Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery need to provide flexibility to process variety of crude oil<br />
Le. both light as well as heavy with high sulfur content.<br />
• Development of resid process<strong>in</strong>g technologies viz. FCCU, hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
etc. to upgrade heavier ends.<br />
• Adoption of technologies like hydro-treatment, hydro-desulphurisation,<br />
summarization etc. to meet str<strong>in</strong>gent product quality likely to be<br />
enforced <strong>in</strong> future. As can be seen from above, all new process<br />
technologies require substantial qualities of hydrogen for which<br />
dedicated hydrogen produc<strong>in</strong>g facilities will have to be <strong>in</strong>stalled.<br />
In India the follow<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ery marg<strong>in</strong>s are there.<br />
• Highon stream factors of process units<br />
• Low manpower costs<br />
• Low cost of land<br />
• Less str<strong>in</strong>gent environmental regulation<br />
• Less transportation cost due to long coastal belt<br />
93
Exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries do have capacity to get useful streams from distillation<br />
columns. So the reprocess<strong>in</strong>g requirement is m<strong>in</strong>imum to sell the production <strong>in</strong><br />
the domestic market. <strong>Indian</strong> manpower cost is cheaper when compared to many<br />
countries <strong>in</strong> Asia Pacific. Low cost of land makes the expansions cheaper and<br />
economical. Environmental regulations are liberal when compared to western<br />
countries. So many f<strong>in</strong>al expensive processes are elim<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />
This reduces the cost of production as well as capital <strong>in</strong>vestment. Flexibility for<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g light as well as heavy crude with high sulfur content will be required<br />
to improve profitability. The environmental regulations will change <strong>in</strong> the near<br />
future. For example Delhi made a lot of changes <strong>in</strong> the regulations, which can be<br />
expected <strong>in</strong> other parts of the country also. To meet these challenges these<br />
optimum processes configuration <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> context are as given <strong>in</strong> the Table 3.26.<br />
Technology up gradation has been a thrust area all along and technology<br />
upgradation plans are be<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uously pursued <strong>in</strong> order to recover bottom of<br />
the barrel to the maximum extent. Technology upgradation has also been<br />
adopted <strong>in</strong> modernization and advance control energy conservation, product<br />
quality improvement, etc. apart from augmentation of crude process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
capacities. Scann<strong>in</strong>g and implement<strong>in</strong>g technological advances is also evident <strong>in</strong><br />
theplansof years to come.<br />
Table 3.26 Optimum processes configuration <strong>in</strong> India.<br />
Processes Advantages<br />
Low Investment<br />
Low return<br />
FCCU +Solvent Deasphalt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Maximum Gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Pitch disposal<br />
High <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
Low return<br />
Resid Hydrotreat<strong>in</strong>g + Resid Catalystic crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Least unwanted products<br />
Maximum Gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Medium <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
FCCU +Delayed cocker (without VGO<br />
High return<br />
hydrotreatment)<br />
Maximum gasol<strong>in</strong>e, Coke disposal<br />
Medium <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
Moderate returns<br />
Hydrocracker +Solvent deasphalt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Maximum middle distillation<br />
Pitch disposal.<br />
94
3.6.5 Options for Types of Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> Future<br />
Future ref<strong>in</strong>ery criteria is a critical subject which has many diversified<br />
op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dividual countries depend<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly on the socio-economic<br />
conditions, political environment, and close observations on environmental<br />
management issues. The countries which depend on imported crude, the crude<br />
quality of their requirement has limited choice because the exporter country<br />
naturally will try to deliver much sour and residuous crude, to the comparatively<br />
less predom<strong>in</strong>ant countries and will def<strong>in</strong>itely use sweet crude for themselves or<br />
supplyto the effluent countries.<br />
In the above context, the day is not far when India has to consider the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g options, though it may appear at the moment a more costly<br />
affair to revamp or reeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries, but when crude will<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>e or deteriorate further the options will be more realistic. Options available<br />
are:<br />
• Sour crude ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Super Oil crack<strong>in</strong>g(SOC)<br />
• Deep catalystic crack<strong>in</strong>g (DCC)<br />
• Hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g for produc<strong>in</strong>g high quality middle distillate<br />
• Distillate dewax<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• ISO dewax<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Modernisation of asphalt technology<br />
• Vacuum gas oil Hydrotreat<strong>in</strong>g and mild hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Flexicock<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Improvement <strong>in</strong> the catalyst design and concepts for vibreak<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
FCC to accommodate more residue and contam<strong>in</strong>ated feed and<br />
beheld position<strong>in</strong>g the catalyst for a reasonable period.<br />
• Reform<strong>in</strong>g units<br />
• Diesel fuel upgrad<strong>in</strong>g: Hydroprocess<strong>in</strong>g for deep desulfurisation<br />
and / or aromatics saturation<br />
• Gasification of petroleum coke<br />
• Integration of hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g with residue upgradation, light cycle<br />
Oil (LCO) upgradation to premium products<br />
• Moderate pressure hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g as a conversion alternative<br />
95
In this scenario the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries also have started to diversify<br />
their ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g options <strong>in</strong>to the areas like petrochemicals manufacture power plant<br />
set up basically to use the furnace oil because the demand for future furnace oil<br />
through out the world is on the decrease, keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
quantity and quality of middle distillates for meet<strong>in</strong>g the demand of transport<br />
fuels.<br />
Demand for high sulfur residual fuels is <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e relative to the demand<br />
for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. This is largely due to environmental considerations, which<br />
are push<strong>in</strong>g the ref<strong>in</strong>ery's product barrel <strong>in</strong>to lighter, low sulfur fuels. Gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />
demand growth <strong>in</strong> Europe and the United States is sluggish while the market for<br />
high quality distillates rema<strong>in</strong> tight. As a result of these changes <strong>in</strong> the market<br />
place, ref<strong>in</strong>eries are seek<strong>in</strong>g routes to a profiTable future. The <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />
residue upgradation technology with gas oil conservation capability has the dual<br />
effect of follow<strong>in</strong>g optimization of process parameters to satisfy products demand<br />
and of provid<strong>in</strong>g flexibility to meet new specification for higher quality<br />
transportation fuels.<br />
3.7 Conclusion<br />
A thorough understand<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil drill<strong>in</strong>g to the consumption of<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ed products is essential to f<strong>in</strong>d out the problems <strong>in</strong> SCM of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Detailed study of production, supply, pric<strong>in</strong>g, consumption of crude oil, and<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ed products etc. was presented as an <strong>in</strong>troduction to this chapter. On the<br />
basis of that <strong>in</strong>formation, the location of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery was studied because location<br />
has great impact on supply cha<strong>in</strong> of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Factor comparison method was<br />
modified to cater to the needs of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery and a n<strong>in</strong>e-factor method was<br />
developed for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out the right location. This model will help <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out<br />
location for a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Weighted scores for each location will be available<br />
from the model. Selection of technology is the important activity after selection of<br />
location. When competition <strong>in</strong>creases, flexibility is a key determ<strong>in</strong>ant factor <strong>in</strong><br />
decid<strong>in</strong>g variety of products and reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory. Inventory reduction can<br />
improve <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>creased profitability. Thirteen areas of flexibility were identified<br />
for the performance improvement <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. It was not tried to quantify the<br />
96
flexibility. This will help <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the performance of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. To<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imize the movement of products, appropriate technology must be selected.<br />
Comparison and suitability of each type of technology was also discussed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>Indian</strong> context.<br />
Demand for standard petroleum products is not <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the world<br />
market even though there is growth <strong>in</strong> the domestic market. After decontroll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and liberalization the <strong>Indian</strong> oil market also will face competition from imported<br />
products and <strong>in</strong>ternational players. Exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries must be equipped to<br />
compete with high quality imported products and value added products from new<br />
generation <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries also. Flexibility <strong>in</strong> all levels, start<strong>in</strong>g from selection<br />
of crude oil to the blend<strong>in</strong>g at the latest possible po<strong>in</strong>t is considered for<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Export<strong>in</strong>g products will be another<br />
option available to the ref<strong>in</strong>eries for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g profitability. Flexibility <strong>in</strong><br />
production must be designed to export products because each market<br />
specification will be different. In a nutshell, flexibility must be maximum for<br />
maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the profit of <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Technology selection must be<br />
supplement<strong>in</strong>g the flexibility. Technology available and suitable for India is<br />
identified. The tools used for location identification was found appropriate and<br />
the results are very encourag<strong>in</strong>g. Methodology for flexibility and technology<br />
selection are found to be very useful. Next chapter discusses the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
97
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Production plann<strong>in</strong>g and schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Product storage plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Post data based model<br />
Causal model<br />
Production Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Production Schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Figure 4.1. Production system (simplified)<br />
Creat<strong>in</strong>ga successful supply cha<strong>in</strong> strategy needs a lot of parameters such as good<br />
transportation facility for crude oil and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products, sufficient facility at port for<br />
handl<strong>in</strong>g all types of ships, good <strong>in</strong>formation technology for data transfer. Once a good<br />
strategy is formulated, actually execut<strong>in</strong>g the strategy is also complex. Many highly<br />
talented and dedicated employees at all levels of the organization are necessary to make a<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> strategy successful. Execution of a strategy can be very important as the<br />
strategy itself. Major obstacles to achieve strategic fit are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly demand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
customers, and fragmentation of supply cha<strong>in</strong> ownership. Overcom<strong>in</strong>g these obstacles<br />
offers tremendous opportunity for firms to use supply cha<strong>in</strong> management to ga<strong>in</strong><br />
competitive advantages.<br />
As discussed <strong>in</strong> chapter 3 there has been <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> world trade of crude oil and<br />
petroleum products. Products that are largely traded are LPG, Naphtha, Kerosene,<br />
Diesel, and Petrol. World over ref<strong>in</strong>eries are work<strong>in</strong>g on cost reduction due to<br />
competition. In many countries <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity for ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is more than the demand<br />
<strong>in</strong>those countries. Those companies are prepared for export of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. Due to<br />
open<strong>in</strong>g up of economy, India is also exposed to <strong>in</strong>ternational competition. Cost<br />
reduction is essential for the <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries also to withstand the competition from<br />
101
other mult<strong>in</strong>ational players. All the elements <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> must be analyzed for<br />
maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the effectiveness of the system. In this chapter the problems of full supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are analysed.<br />
4.2 Problems <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
Major petroleum companies have many ref<strong>in</strong>eries at different locations <strong>in</strong> the<br />
country. <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation is an example. S<strong>in</strong>gle ref<strong>in</strong>ery companies are also there<br />
<strong>in</strong> India. Multiple ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g companies have their own advantages and some<br />
disadvantages. Ma<strong>in</strong> advantages are given below.<br />
a. Shar<strong>in</strong>g of key experts and expertise. Expertise <strong>in</strong> purchase of crude oil and<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g can be utilized for all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the group. Experience <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
operation and ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g can be transferred to newer ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />
b. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t decision will help <strong>in</strong> policy decisions. Corporate office will have<br />
competent team for formulat<strong>in</strong>g major policy decision for each ref<strong>in</strong>ery at different<br />
locations. The entire ref<strong>in</strong>ery will have uniform style of operation, so the performance of<br />
all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries can be better due to centralized decision mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
c. Bulk Purchase is possible for multiple ref<strong>in</strong>eries because the purchase is<br />
controlled centrally from the corporate office. The bulk purchase will have price<br />
advantage. Term purchase can be made for major quantity and spot purchase can be<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imized. This will give better sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> purchase.<br />
d. Shar<strong>in</strong>g of crude is a ga<strong>in</strong> for multi site ref<strong>in</strong>ery because bulk conta<strong>in</strong>ers can<br />
be used for transport<strong>in</strong>g crude oil from far off places like Egypt. So the price ga<strong>in</strong> can be<br />
tapped bythese groups.<br />
e. Shar<strong>in</strong>g of products and streams is possible for these ref<strong>in</strong>eries, if there is<br />
a demand for a product <strong>in</strong> the market of another ref<strong>in</strong>ery, then that product can be<br />
supplied from another ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Similarly if a product is held up <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery that can be<br />
moved tosomeother place where there is demand.<br />
f. Specialized products can be manufactured <strong>in</strong> one unit and can be supplied to<br />
all the market. Specialized products normally require high capital <strong>in</strong>vestment, which will<br />
not be feasible with all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries. One ref<strong>in</strong>ery of a group of ref<strong>in</strong>eries can very well<br />
manage it.<br />
102
g. Distribution grid can be developed by multi site ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Market<strong>in</strong>g is easy<br />
for these ref<strong>in</strong>eries because of the availability of products and capital required for the<br />
grid development.<br />
h. Market Control is easier because of the grid. More number of outlets can be<br />
developed so that the entry of new market<strong>in</strong>g companies can be prevented to a greater<br />
extend.<br />
Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery needs to concentrate <strong>in</strong> production only because all other elements<br />
of supply cha<strong>in</strong> will be taken care by separate departments <strong>in</strong> corporate office. For<br />
example, purchase will be done by the purchase department of the corporate office. So<br />
each ref<strong>in</strong>ery can develop strength <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and be normally very good <strong>in</strong> capacity<br />
utilization. S<strong>in</strong>gle site ref<strong>in</strong>ery has some advantages over the multi site ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />
Decision on all maters can be taken faster because all the offices are <strong>in</strong> the same site.<br />
Implementation of decisions will also be faster. So the response of the system will be<br />
faster than multi-site ref<strong>in</strong>eries. In our research we have selected a s<strong>in</strong>gle site ref<strong>in</strong>ery for<br />
the study of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management because all the data are available from a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
source. First hand <strong>in</strong>formation is available on all operations from the same ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Operations and plann<strong>in</strong>g are similar <strong>in</strong> multi-site and s<strong>in</strong>gle site ref<strong>in</strong>eries. In multi-site<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries different <strong>in</strong>formation are available at different geographical locations. The<br />
selected ref<strong>in</strong>ery is hav<strong>in</strong>g very good operat<strong>in</strong>g efficiency. It is consistently above 100%<br />
for the years 1998 to 2002. It is process<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>Indian</strong> and imported crude oil. So<br />
procedure for the purchase of imported and <strong>Indian</strong> crude is also available. All the<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation required for a detailed analysis of function<strong>in</strong>g of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is available with<br />
the ref<strong>in</strong>ery selected for study. So the data collected represents the true picture of a<br />
typical ref<strong>in</strong>ery<strong>in</strong> India.<br />
4.2.1 Logistic Problems<br />
Complexity of logistic problem <strong>in</strong>creases with variables such as limitation of<br />
distillation column, limitation of port facility for handl<strong>in</strong>g ships, etc. Logistics problem<br />
can bebroadly divided <strong>in</strong>to two stages namely design stage, and plann<strong>in</strong>g and operation<br />
stage. Operat<strong>in</strong>g problems are of less severe nature <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries with lot of automation<br />
and control systems. Hence they are not discussed here <strong>in</strong> detail. Majority of the design<br />
stage problem cannot be rectified after <strong>in</strong>stallation. So the optimal solutions can be<br />
achieved ma<strong>in</strong>ly for new ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries can look for alternative solutions<br />
for the problem. For example jetty facility cannot be improved beyond a certa<strong>in</strong> limit for<br />
an exist<strong>in</strong>g port. But at the time of site selection port facility can be given due<br />
103
importance. Solutions for design stage problems are capital <strong>in</strong>tensive and time<br />
consum<strong>in</strong>g. Improvement <strong>in</strong> design will not be normally as efficient as a new design. So<br />
<strong>in</strong> this discussion the important design stage problems are dealt with. This will be useful<br />
for newref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />
'a<br />
Tb141M' a e . atrllofl" OlllStlCS problems Design Stage<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g Stage<br />
Annual Plan Roll<strong>in</strong>g Plan Daily Plan<br />
-Jetty Characteristics - Quantity OfCrude - Ratio ofcrude types - Plan for ship receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
c<br />
:::I -Moor<strong>in</strong>g Types - Comparison OfRude - Ship selection<br />
- Plann<strong>in</strong>g tanks<br />
0<br />
J:l -Pipel<strong>in</strong>e Selection<br />
.E<br />
- Rates Of <strong>Indian</strong> And - Shar<strong>in</strong>g with other - Plann<strong>in</strong>g pipel<strong>in</strong>e for crude<br />
-Crude Storage Tanks Imported Crude ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
- M<strong>in</strong>imize demurrage<br />
..<br />
-Selection OfProcess -OEB - Ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g - Process<strong>in</strong>g ofcrude<br />
"ii<br />
- Variety OfProducts -Products Demand - Availability oftanks -Variety ofproducts<br />
c<br />
!<br />
-Site Selection Products - Availability OfCrude - Products offtake - Blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
.E<br />
-Storage Capacity • Connectivity OfTanks - Product demand -Tank schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
..<br />
'a<br />
c<br />
:::I<br />
0<br />
J:l<br />
:::I<br />
0<br />
- Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance - Product mix -Information generation<br />
- Transportation modes - Ratio ofeach mode - Ratio ofproducts - Load<strong>in</strong>g each mode<br />
- Load<strong>in</strong>g systems - Demand ofproducts - Mode oftransport - Information generation<br />
- Parcel sizes - Area wise demand - Arrang<strong>in</strong>g transport - Capacity utilization<br />
The complex problem can be divided <strong>in</strong> to subgroups for easy and efficient<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g. It is standard practice <strong>in</strong> logistics related studies to classify and study problems<br />
as <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound logistics problems, Lamm<strong>in</strong>g, et.al [2002]. We have<br />
also adopted this method.<br />
4.2.2Inbound Logistics Problems<br />
Major classification is made as design stage, plann<strong>in</strong>g stage, and operational<br />
stage. In the case of ref<strong>in</strong>ery some major plann<strong>in</strong>g decisions must be taken <strong>in</strong> the design<br />
stage itself. Plans must be made <strong>in</strong> the solution space constra<strong>in</strong>ed by design. Major<br />
decisions of design stage <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound logistics are jetty characteristics, moor<strong>in</strong>g types,<br />
pipel<strong>in</strong>e selection and crude storage tanks. Jetty characteristics <strong>in</strong>volve draft <strong>in</strong> the jetty,<br />
discharg<strong>in</strong>g facility for crude oil, pilotage facility for day and night and turn<strong>in</strong>g radius for<br />
ships. Moor<strong>in</strong>g is a bottleneck for many oil ports. Ships with high ullage cannot be<br />
brought to many of the ports <strong>in</strong> the country. The alternative for this is go<strong>in</strong>g for s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t moor<strong>in</strong>g (SPM). Inbound logistics deals with identification of supplier, purchas<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
transport<strong>in</strong>g, receiv<strong>in</strong>g, and storage of raw material and services. In the case of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
<strong>in</strong>bound logistics ma<strong>in</strong>ly deals with identification of crude oil, purchas<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil,<br />
104
Daily Plan <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound logistics will make the arrival and storage of crude oil.<br />
Smooth ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g is the most important activity <strong>in</strong> this. By proper ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
demurrages can be m<strong>in</strong>imized and storage tanks can be properly utilized. S<strong>in</strong>ce pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
is a bottleneck for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, schedul<strong>in</strong>g will help <strong>in</strong> better utilization of pipel<strong>in</strong>e also. A<br />
simulation model for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g is developed.<br />
4.2.3 Internal Logistic Problems<br />
Internal logistics generally deals with the issues of transport<strong>in</strong>g, value additions,<br />
and storage of f<strong>in</strong>ished products. In the case of ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics deals with the<br />
delivery of crude oil from tanks <strong>in</strong> the tank farm, transport<strong>in</strong>g through pipel<strong>in</strong>e to the<br />
distillation columns, distillation, transferr<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed streams to different tanks, blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
tomakef<strong>in</strong>al products, and storage <strong>in</strong> tanks for market<strong>in</strong>g. Selection of process, variety<br />
products, site selection, and products storage capacity are the important facilities to be<br />
considered <strong>in</strong> the design stage of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery; technology for many process are available.<br />
Selection of technology is very important because availability of crude oil and products<br />
demand has high impact on the process<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil. Site of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery is important<br />
asfar logistics is concerned. Details are given <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3. Options for selection of site<br />
and factors to be considered are all discussed <strong>in</strong> detail. The areas where annual plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
isrequired are given below:<br />
• Demand for products<br />
• Availability of crude<br />
• Oil economic budget<br />
• Connectivity of storage tanks-us<strong>in</strong>g design flexibility<br />
Oil economic budget (OEB) is the budget estimate of crude for a year. Demand for<br />
products is estimated for the year. On the basis of the estimated demand the OEB is<br />
prepared.<br />
Roll<strong>in</strong>g short plan deals with the follow<strong>in</strong>g areas.<br />
• Ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Availability of tanks<br />
• Products demand<br />
• Products off stake<br />
• Product mix<br />
Ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g can be done for a month and it needs monitor<strong>in</strong>g also. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is essential to avoid starv<strong>in</strong>g and block<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery operation. If the supply is not<br />
enough, then there will be starv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g process. If the supply is more, it will<br />
block the delivery due to unavailability of tanks <strong>in</strong> the tank farm. In ref<strong>in</strong>ery the stages<br />
106
are tightly coupled with limited <strong>in</strong>ter-stages. So it is difficult to manage if starvation or<br />
blockages take place. This can be overcome with proper short term plann<strong>in</strong>g. Solution for<br />
shipschedul<strong>in</strong>g problem is given <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Tank availability for storage of crude oil<br />
and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products must be planned <strong>in</strong> advance because all tanks cannot be used<br />
<strong>in</strong>terchangeably. Connection between tanks is important <strong>in</strong> utiliz<strong>in</strong>g tanks to the full<br />
capacity. All tanks are not <strong>in</strong>terconnected. This <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terconnection needs<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g and time for do<strong>in</strong>g the connection. Tanks used for certa<strong>in</strong> products cannot be<br />
used for some other products, for example tanks used for furnace oil cannot be used for<br />
stor<strong>in</strong>g motor spirit. Products off take also must be planned <strong>in</strong> advance. It is normally<br />
based on the prediction of the demand. Solution for the problem of error <strong>in</strong> products<br />
demand is discussed <strong>in</strong> this Chapter. Products demand <strong>in</strong> the market can be monitored<br />
exactly and which will lead to better plann<strong>in</strong>g of products movement. Product mix also<br />
can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a better way by the newly suggested <strong>in</strong>formation system (chapter 5).<br />
This will reduce the level of<strong>in</strong>ventory.<br />
Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves the type of crude and quantity of crude to be processed <strong>in</strong><br />
each distillation column. Operational plann<strong>in</strong>g is necessary because there can be<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory and flow rate of crude oil. Buffer <strong>in</strong>ventory can vary from three<br />
months roll<strong>in</strong>g plan. So adjustments <strong>in</strong> flow rate become necessary. This may lead to<br />
adjustments <strong>in</strong> daily plann<strong>in</strong>g of capacity and <strong>in</strong>terconnection of tanks. Availability of<br />
products is dependent on these decisions. Variety of products also will be a function of<br />
daily plann<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil process<strong>in</strong>g. Blend<strong>in</strong>g is done for achiev<strong>in</strong>g the correct<br />
specification of products. It is based on the demand from the market. The blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
decision is also taken daily. Problems and solutions of blend<strong>in</strong>g are given <strong>in</strong> chapter 6.<br />
Tank schedul<strong>in</strong>g is also done on daily basis. This problem cannot be generalized because<br />
the connectivity among tanks is unique <strong>in</strong> each ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Information generation also<br />
must be monitored on daily basis. Inbound logistics generates a lot of data. Detailed data<br />
collection model is also discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5.<br />
4.2.4 Outbound Logistics Problems<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>eries use pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship, railway wagons, and truck for movement of ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
products. The quantity varies with respect to the location of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery and target<br />
market. Mode of transport must be decided at the time of design itself to build up<br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure facility as per the demand and supply. Selection of mode can be made on<br />
the basis of <strong>in</strong>formation available <strong>in</strong> Table 4.2. Load<strong>in</strong>g system of each mode is different<br />
and thedeign of the system depends on the quantity to be handled. For example if more<br />
107
mode and each product is taken on daily basis. Correct plann<strong>in</strong>g cannot be done <strong>in</strong><br />
advance because small quantities demand will not be <strong>in</strong>timated <strong>in</strong> advance. They will be<br />
directly com<strong>in</strong>g to the load<strong>in</strong>g place with required document. So <strong>in</strong>formation generation<br />
is important on each day for the plann<strong>in</strong>g of next day. Data generated must be converted<br />
to <strong>in</strong>formation. Schedul<strong>in</strong>g for each day can be done on the capacity of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. So<br />
delivery plans must be made on the basis of <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g strategy is<br />
given <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.2.<br />
Crude available<br />
Process capacity available<br />
Inventory on hand<br />
Required clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
Demandforecast<br />
Storage space available<br />
Daily planfor production Quantity ofproducts<br />
Figure 4.2 Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g strategy<br />
Analysis of logistics problem <strong>in</strong>dicates the importance of overall plann<strong>in</strong>g cannot<br />
be done <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle stage. Bechtel [1993] reveals the importance of hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for better and easier performance of an organization. So a hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g model<br />
has beendeveloped for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />
4.3 Hierarchical Model for Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Like any other <strong>in</strong>dustry, petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>eries also need to have plann<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
different time periods. In ref<strong>in</strong>eries it is found to be effective with annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, three<br />
months roll<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g, one months firm plann<strong>in</strong>g, and daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. Splitt<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g to different time zones make it more effective and efficient. The <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
available at annual plann<strong>in</strong>g stage is more aggregate and <strong>in</strong>accurate. With the availability<br />
of better quality forecasts at three months level the same can be used to make more<br />
accurate plans. The variations are lesser at monthly and daily levels mak<strong>in</strong>g it possible<br />
109
Tentative demand for products will be available from the monthly plann<strong>in</strong>g. This<br />
can be used for daily plann<strong>in</strong>g for production. Along with that, the stock available with<br />
the ref<strong>in</strong>ery also must be considered for the daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. Crude oil available for<br />
ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g can be planned accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>formation from monthly plan. Both quantity<br />
and quality of each type of crude oil is planned <strong>in</strong> the monthly plan. Arrival of ships is<br />
available from the ship schedule programmed and it is dependent on the ullages at<br />
dest<strong>in</strong>ation. Plann<strong>in</strong>g for receiv<strong>in</strong>g ships can be made on daily basis. Information on ship<br />
arrival must be passed to the port for <strong>in</strong>frastructure facility provid<strong>in</strong>g. Storage of<br />
products <strong>in</strong> tank is decided on daily basis only because it depends on the product uplift.<br />
Product movement and production cannot be planned <strong>in</strong> advance. For better and correct<br />
performance, daily plann<strong>in</strong>g will be better. Same is true for the crude oil storage also.<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g is also planned accord<strong>in</strong>g to the customer specification streams available and<br />
product demand. Normal practice for blend<strong>in</strong>g is mak<strong>in</strong>g correct specification <strong>in</strong> .each<br />
tank. Soblend<strong>in</strong>g can be planned only on daily basis.<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g sequence discussed <strong>in</strong> this section provides better and smooth flow of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation from annual plann<strong>in</strong>g to daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. This makes the ref<strong>in</strong>ery operations<br />
smooth and the efficiency of the system will improve. It will also help <strong>in</strong> remov<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> operation and plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
4.3.5 Plann<strong>in</strong>g Comparison<br />
Hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g shows the stages of plann<strong>in</strong>g. It will be useful for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
to compare the present practices and the system demand <strong>in</strong> SCM. Plann<strong>in</strong>g zones are<br />
subdivided <strong>in</strong>to three for convenience of analysis namely annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, roll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g, and daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. In this comparison three months plan and monthly plan<br />
are merged together because the same tools are used for both plans and they overlap very<br />
much <strong>in</strong> majority of areas. Table 4. 3 shows the present practices <strong>in</strong> annual plann<strong>in</strong>g zone<br />
and proposes tools for performance improvement<br />
Table 4.4 shows roll<strong>in</strong>g plan which covers both three months and monthly<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g and Table 4.5 shows daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. Different tools are given <strong>in</strong> the Tables. Each<br />
tool can be modified to send and ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Data for the tools is taken from a standalone<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Performance of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery was analyzed <strong>in</strong> detail and is given <strong>in</strong> Chapter 6.<br />
114
Table 4.3 Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Function Data Used Decision to betaken<br />
Crude type<br />
Quantity, Quality and cost of<br />
crude, Assays, capacity<br />
Selection constra<strong>in</strong>ts and netback<br />
Model<br />
Present Proposed<br />
Grades ofcrude tobe Data based<br />
purchased each us<strong>in</strong>g 'what LP<br />
month if<br />
."<br />
c:<br />
:::I<br />
0<br />
.a<br />
.5<br />
Crude<br />
Purchase<br />
Ship size<br />
Selection<br />
Quantity, Quality and cost of<br />
crude, logistics cost, Assays,<br />
capacity constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />
netback<br />
Size ofships, Per day costs,<br />
travel, load and joumey times,<br />
demurrage rates<br />
Crude to be<br />
purchased each<br />
month from each<br />
supplier<br />
Select<strong>in</strong>g optimum<br />
size ship from each<br />
load port<br />
Data based<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g 'what<br />
if<br />
Thumb rule<br />
LP<br />
Spread<br />
sheet<br />
Port facility<br />
Size ofships, parcel size,<br />
draft, number ofberths,<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g facilities, discharge<br />
rates, port charges<br />
Selection ofthe Port<br />
facilities togo for<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g expansion<br />
'What if<br />
expert<br />
op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />
based<br />
Spread<br />
sheet and<br />
simulation<br />
ii<br />
E<br />
• -.5<br />
Process<br />
automation<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
Product Quality demand,<br />
Automation costs, Flexibility<br />
and control requirements,<br />
manpower costs<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance history,<br />
condition data, Production<br />
schedules<br />
Degree ofautomation<br />
to use <strong>in</strong> process<br />
control <strong>in</strong> the Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
When todo planned<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance for what<br />
Automated<br />
Experience<br />
based<br />
No change<br />
Spread<br />
sheet<br />
Oil Economy<br />
Budget<br />
Product demand, Crudes<br />
available, capacity, netbacks<br />
How much ofwhich<br />
crude toprocess when<br />
<strong>in</strong> each ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
All India<br />
data<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
data focus<br />
."<br />
c:<br />
:::I<br />
0<br />
.a-:::I<br />
0<br />
Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
design for<br />
transport<br />
Transport<br />
mode<br />
Demand for products at<br />
different location, Cost per ton<br />
ofmode, Flexibility required<br />
Rate oftransport, Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
capacity, customer preference<br />
Capacity and<br />
expandability ofeach<br />
type ofterm<strong>in</strong>al<br />
Mode oftransport<br />
All India<br />
demand<br />
Thumb rule<br />
Demand<br />
forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
model<br />
Spread<br />
sheet<br />
Roll<strong>in</strong>g plan time zone also is divided <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>bound logistics, <strong>in</strong>temallogistics, and<br />
outbound logistics. Analysis is done on the basis of function, data presently used, and<br />
decision to be used. Tools used for each type of decision mak<strong>in</strong>g at each level are<br />
analyzed and proposals for new set of tools are suggested wherever required. General<br />
practice of ref<strong>in</strong>eries is thump rule based decision mak<strong>in</strong>g except <strong>in</strong> critical areas like<br />
crude selection, blend<strong>in</strong>g, etc.<br />
115
Table 4.4 Roll<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Function Data Used<br />
Quantity, Quality and<br />
Quotations ofcrudes, Crude to be<br />
Model<br />
Decision to be<br />
taken Present Proposed<br />
Crude logistics cost, Assays, purchased each Data based<br />
Purchase capacity constra<strong>in</strong>ts and month from each us<strong>in</strong>g 'what if<br />
'1:1<br />
c<br />
:J<br />
netbacks supplier<br />
.8<br />
.E<br />
Ship<br />
selection and<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Quality ofcrude from each<br />
supplier, ships available<br />
and alternate possible<br />
schedules<br />
Decid<strong>in</strong>g which<br />
ships to hire from<br />
which ports and<br />
when<br />
Thumb Rule<br />
and<br />
experience<br />
Ship schedule<br />
evaluation<br />
Simulation<br />
based DSS<br />
Ship schedules, production When to take<br />
Tank schedules, tank yard which tanks for Gantt based<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance capacities, major de-sludg<strong>in</strong>g and Thump rule evaluation of<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>tenance plans, time m<strong>in</strong>or alternative<br />
ii<br />
E<br />
GI<br />
-.E<br />
Plant<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for ma<strong>in</strong>tenance oftank<br />
Production and dispatch<br />
schedules, Product tank<br />
yard capacities and<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory, major<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance plans, time<br />
for ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of<br />
equipment<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
When to take<br />
which equipment<br />
for and m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
Departmental<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
experience<br />
Gantt based<br />
evaluation of<br />
alternative<br />
Transport Distance to move, Qty Apportion<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />
mode moved, frequency of rakes, ships and Thump rule Spread sheet<br />
'1:1<br />
c<br />
:J<br />
0<br />
.a -:J 0<br />
selection<br />
Transport<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
movement, cost, ullage<br />
Product demand, mode<br />
selection results, costs,<br />
capacities oftransport<br />
lorry<br />
How much of<br />
transport facility<br />
needed and when<br />
and where?<br />
Gross level<br />
aggregate/ap<br />
proximate<br />
Spread sheet<br />
based with<br />
'what iffacility'<br />
Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g also requires keen attention for improv<strong>in</strong>g the performance of<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Majority of decisions can be taken with the help of<br />
spreadsheet. Decision like ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g requires sophisticated tools like simulation.<br />
Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery is not normally considered as very important because it goes <strong>in</strong><br />
flow because it is a process <strong>in</strong>dustry. Proper daily plann<strong>in</strong>g can reduce both semi f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />
and f<strong>in</strong>ished goods <strong>in</strong>ventory.<br />
116<br />
LP
Table 4.5 Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Function Data Used Decision to betaken<br />
Ships wait<strong>in</strong>g, crude type,<br />
Ship Receiv<strong>in</strong>g demurrage rates, Stage at<br />
"C Berth<strong>in</strong>Q facility<br />
c ::;,<br />
Decide order <strong>in</strong>which<br />
ships will be received<br />
Model<br />
Present Proposed<br />
Spread sheet Simulation<br />
0<br />
.a<br />
.5<br />
Tank allocation<br />
Tank capacity, condition,<br />
pipel<strong>in</strong>e connectivity, crude<br />
storage capacity required,<br />
production plan<br />
Allocat<strong>in</strong>g tanks tocrude Thumb rule<br />
Modified thumb<br />
rule<br />
Process<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
crude<br />
Product demand, assay and<br />
plant technical<br />
characteristics<br />
Which crude toprocess<br />
<strong>in</strong>which facility and<br />
when<br />
Spread sheet<br />
Spread sheet<br />
(not modified)<br />
ii<br />
... c<br />
Cl)<br />
.5 -<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
How much ofWhat product<br />
ofwhat specs required, how<br />
much ofwhat are the<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>a streams available<br />
How much ofwhich<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g streams to<br />
blend towhich products<br />
Experience and<br />
based on batch<br />
lab chemical<br />
tests<br />
LP<br />
Storage tank<br />
selection for<br />
products<br />
Tank capacity, condition,<br />
pipel<strong>in</strong>e connectivity,<br />
product storage required,<br />
dispatch plan<br />
Allocat<strong>in</strong>g tanks to<br />
different products<br />
Thumb rule<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
centralized tank<br />
vard data<br />
Modified thumb<br />
rule<br />
"C<br />
c<br />
::;,<br />
0<br />
.a- ::;,<br />
0<br />
Dispatch<br />
transaction<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Dispatch of<br />
goods<br />
Wait<strong>in</strong>g orders, urgency<br />
requests, status ofload<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stations, transport<br />
availability<br />
Pend<strong>in</strong>g orders, wait<strong>in</strong>g<br />
transport for dispatch,<br />
clearance for disoatch<br />
To select order totake<br />
and process from wait<strong>in</strong>g<br />
customers<br />
To select order tofill<br />
from wait<strong>in</strong>g orders<br />
Rule based<br />
Rule based<br />
Rule based-<br />
modified<br />
Rule based-<br />
modified<br />
4.4. Plann<strong>in</strong>g Demand<br />
All supply cha<strong>in</strong> decisions are based on an estimate of future demand. The forecast<br />
offuture demand forms the basis for all strategic and plann<strong>in</strong>g decisions <strong>in</strong> a supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong>. Consider the push/pull view of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> discussed <strong>in</strong> section 4.4.5. All push<br />
processes are performed <strong>in</strong> anticipation of customer demand, and all pull process is<br />
performed <strong>in</strong> response to customer demand. For push processes, a company must plan<br />
the level of production. For pull process, a company must plan the level of capacity to<br />
make available.<br />
4.4.1 Characteristicsof Forecast<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g characteristics must be known to forecast<strong>in</strong>g department. Long<br />
term forecasts are usually less accurate than short term forecasts, Le. long term forecasts<br />
have alargest standard deviations of error relative to the mean than short term forecasts.<br />
Aggregate forecasts are usually more accurate than desegregate forecasts. Aggregate<br />
forecasts tend to have a smaller standard deviation of error relative to the mean. For<br />
example - it is easy to forecast the gross domestic product (GDP) of India for a given year<br />
with less than a 2 percent error. It is much more difficult to forecast yearly earn<strong>in</strong>gs for a<br />
117
company with less than 2 percent error, and it is even harder to forecast demand for a<br />
given product with the same degree of accuracy. The key difference between the three<br />
forecasts is the degree of aggregation.<br />
4.4.2 Components of a forecast<br />
A Company can create useful forecasts, if it <strong>in</strong>terprets the past correctly. Customer<br />
demands be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by a variety of factors and can be predicted if a company can<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e the relationship between the current value of these factors and future demand.<br />
For good demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g, company must identify the factors that <strong>in</strong>fluence future<br />
demand and then ascerta<strong>in</strong> the relationship between these factors and future demand.<br />
Before a ref<strong>in</strong>ery selects a forecast<strong>in</strong>g method, it must clearly know what the<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong>'s response time is as this <strong>in</strong>formation determ<strong>in</strong>es when the forecast need to<br />
be made. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery must also know about numerous factors that may be related to the<br />
demand forecast, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
• Past demand<br />
• State of the economy<br />
• Competitors volumes<br />
• Newcompetitors<br />
• Government policies<br />
A ref<strong>in</strong>ery must understand such factors before select<strong>in</strong>g an appropriate<br />
forecast<strong>in</strong>g methodology.<br />
4.4.3 Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Method for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Methods can be classified accord<strong>in</strong>g to the follow<strong>in</strong>g four types.<br />
Qualitative: They are most appropriate when there are little historical data<br />
available or when experts have market <strong>in</strong>telligence that is critical <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g the forecast.<br />
Such method may be necessary to forecast demand several years <strong>in</strong>to the future <strong>in</strong> a new<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Time series: Time series forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods use historical demand to make a<br />
forecast. They are based on the assumption that past demand history is a good <strong>in</strong>dicator<br />
of future demand. These methods are most appropriate when the environmental<br />
situation is stable and the basic demand pattern does not vary significantly from one year<br />
to the next.<br />
118
Causal: Causal forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>in</strong>volveassum<strong>in</strong>g that the demand forecast is<br />
highly correlated with certa<strong>in</strong> factors <strong>in</strong> the environment (e.g. the state of the economy)<br />
Causal forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods f<strong>in</strong>d this correlation between demand and environmental<br />
factors and use estimates of what environmental factors will be to forecast future<br />
demand. For example, product pric<strong>in</strong>g is strongly correlated with demand.<br />
Simulation: Simulation forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods imitate the consumer choices that<br />
give rise to demand to arrive at a forecast.<br />
Time series methods are most appropriate when future demand is expected to<br />
follow historical patterns. When a ref<strong>in</strong>ery attempts to forecast demand based on<br />
historical <strong>in</strong>formation, the current demand, any historical growth patterns, and any<br />
historical seasonal patterns will <strong>in</strong>fluence that company's future demand. Moreover with<br />
this forecast<strong>in</strong>g method, there is always a random element that cannot be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
current demand, historical patterns or seasonality. Therefore, any observed demand can<br />
be broken down <strong>in</strong>to a systematic and random component.<br />
Observed demand (0) =Systematic Component(s) + Random Component(s)<br />
The systematic component measures the expected value of demand and consists<br />
of level, the current depersonalized demand, trend, the rate of growth or decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />
demand for the next period, and seasonally, the predictable seasonal fluctuation <strong>in</strong><br />
demand.<br />
The objective of forecast<strong>in</strong>g is to filter out the random component (noise) and<br />
estimate the systematic component. The difference between the forecast and actual<br />
demand is forecast error.<br />
Out of these methods time series forecast<strong>in</strong>g is most suitable for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Adaptive category of time series method is ideal for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In adaptive forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
methods, companies update their estimates of the various parts (eg. Level, trend,<br />
seasonality) of the systematic component of demand after they make each demand<br />
observation. Adaptive methods assume that a portion of the error is attributed to<br />
<strong>in</strong>correct estimation of the systematic component with the rest attributed to the random<br />
component. This method updates the systematic component after each demand<br />
observation. Adaptive methods <strong>in</strong>clude mov<strong>in</strong>g averages, simple exponential smooth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and exponential smooth<strong>in</strong>g with corrections for trend and seasonality. Exponential<br />
119
4.4.4.1 Understand the Objective of Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The first step a ref<strong>in</strong>ery should take is to clarify the objective of the forecast. The<br />
objective of every forecast is to support decisions that are needed for the forecast. All<br />
parties affected by a supply cha<strong>in</strong> decision should know the l<strong>in</strong>k between the decision and<br />
the forecast. For example, as per the forecast the diesel demand is go<strong>in</strong>g to be more <strong>in</strong><br />
December. All parties must thus come up with a common forecast for a shared plan of<br />
action based on the forecast. Failure to make decisions jo<strong>in</strong>tly may result <strong>in</strong> either too<br />
much or too little product <strong>in</strong> various stages of the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. At this stage the ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
must specify whether it wants a forecast based on geography, products or aggregate plan.<br />
Forecast horizon is the time lag between the po<strong>in</strong>t at which the forecast is made and the<br />
event be<strong>in</strong>g forecast. For example, the crude purchase plann<strong>in</strong>g starts two months <strong>in</strong><br />
advance. So the forecast<strong>in</strong>g for the month of December must be over at least by<br />
September.<br />
Integrated Demand Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Forecast<strong>in</strong>g. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery should l<strong>in</strong>k its forecast<br />
to all plann<strong>in</strong>g activities with<strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> that will use the forecast. This <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
capacity plann<strong>in</strong>g, production plann<strong>in</strong>g and purchas<strong>in</strong>g. This l<strong>in</strong>k should exist at both<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation system and the human resource management level. As a variety of functions<br />
are affected by the outcomes of the plann<strong>in</strong>g process, it is important that all of them are<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the forecast<strong>in</strong>g process. Ideal method for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery to have a cross<br />
functional team, with members from each affected function responsible for forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
demand. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery should also <strong>in</strong>volve the people responsible for execut<strong>in</strong>g a plan <strong>in</strong> the<br />
forecast<strong>in</strong>g and plann<strong>in</strong>g process to ensure that all operational issues are taken <strong>in</strong>to<br />
consideration dur<strong>in</strong>g the forecast<strong>in</strong>g and plann<strong>in</strong>g phase.<br />
4.4.4.2 Identify major factors that <strong>in</strong>fluence the Demand forecast<br />
A proper analysis of these factors is central for develop<strong>in</strong>g an appropriate<br />
forecast<strong>in</strong>g technique. The ma<strong>in</strong> factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g forecasts are demand, supply and<br />
product related phenomena. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery must ascerta<strong>in</strong> whether demand is grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
consistent or has a seasonal pattern. These estimates must be based on demand not on<br />
sales data. On the supply side, a ref<strong>in</strong>ery must consider the available supply sources to<br />
decide on the accuracy of the forecast desired. Ifalternate supply sources with short lead<br />
time areavailable, a highly accurate forecast may not be especially important.<br />
121
4.4.4.3 Understand and Identify Area of supply<br />
The area must be selected on the basis of convenience <strong>in</strong> conveyance, proximity of<br />
another ref<strong>in</strong>ery or mode of transportation. Number of <strong>in</strong>dustrial customers and their<br />
percentage consumption also will affect forecast<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
4.4.4.4 Determ<strong>in</strong>e the Appropriate Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Techniques<br />
In select<strong>in</strong>g appropriate forecast<strong>in</strong>g techniques a ref<strong>in</strong>ery must first understand<br />
the dimensions that will be relevant to the forecast. These dimensions <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
geographical area, product groups and customer groups. The ref<strong>in</strong>ery should understand<br />
the differences <strong>in</strong> demand along each dimension. At this stage a firm selects an<br />
appropriate forecast<strong>in</strong>g method from the four methods discussed earlier.<br />
4.4.4.5 Establish Performance and Error Measures for forecast<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>eries must establish clear performance measures to evaluate the accuracy<br />
and timel<strong>in</strong>ess of the forecast. These measures should correlate with the objectives of the<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess decisions based on the forecasts.<br />
All supply cha<strong>in</strong> design and plann<strong>in</strong>g decisions are based on a forecast of customer<br />
demand. These decisions <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> plant and equipment, production<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g sales force allocation, and workforce hir<strong>in</strong>g. Good demand forecasts have a<br />
significant impact on supply cha<strong>in</strong> performance.<br />
4.4.5 Push Vs Pull<br />
Push systems generally requires <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the form of elaborate material<br />
requirement plann<strong>in</strong>g (MRP) systems to take the master production schedule and roll it<br />
back, creat<strong>in</strong>g schedules for suppliers with quantity and delivery dates. Pull systems<br />
require <strong>in</strong>formation on actual demand to be transmitted extremely quickly through out<br />
the entire cha<strong>in</strong> so that production of products can accurately reflect the real demand.<br />
Oil ref<strong>in</strong>eries are work<strong>in</strong>g on push system. Major disadvantage of push system for<br />
aref<strong>in</strong>ery is the product variety. All the products may not have sufficient demand, so the<br />
hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity and time will <strong>in</strong>crease. The present practice is to select crude oil suitable<br />
for the process so that the distillates with high marg<strong>in</strong> will be the maximum. Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quantity is decided on the basis of <strong>in</strong>stalled process<strong>in</strong>g capacity. In both the cases<br />
122
variety can be <strong>in</strong>creased depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the availability. By process<strong>in</strong>g one metric tonne<br />
of Bombay high (BH) the ref<strong>in</strong>ery will get Rs. 898 and by process<strong>in</strong>g Labuan the ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
will get only Rs. 395. Ref<strong>in</strong>eries will not get BH for its full demand. The maximum<br />
availability of BH is 325000 MT. To meet the products demand, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery must process<br />
different types of crude oil. For example to meet the demand for Aviation turb<strong>in</strong>e fuel<br />
(ATF), the ref<strong>in</strong>ery must process Iranian Mix (Ir. Mix.) Kuwaity and Basrah light (Basrah<br />
Lt.) Names of crude and its yield of each product is calculated for the constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Crude<br />
oil selected for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery are Bombay High(BH),Qua Iboe (QI), Labuan (L), Miri(M),<br />
Iranian Mix (IM), Kuwaity (K), and Basrah Light (BL) . The problem is discussed below.<br />
The company, from were the data was collected, did not permit to reveal actual<br />
values of the coefficients and constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the LP hence, similar values are used <strong>in</strong><br />
thesis. The values used for solv<strong>in</strong>g LP are only realistic but not real these values provided<br />
<strong>in</strong> thisproblem must not be used as secondary data for any further studies.<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery crude oil optimization<br />
PROBLEM DATA IN EQUATION STYLE<br />
Maximize<br />
+ 898 BH + 797 QI + 393 L + 410 M + 245 IM + 804 K + 657 BL<br />
Subject to<br />
CONSTR 1<br />
+ 1 BH + 1 L + 1 M + 1 IM + 1 K + 1 BL = 705000<br />
CONSTR 3<br />
+ 1 BH = 31500<br />
CONSTR 5<br />
+ 1 BH + 1 QI + 1 L + 1 M = 410000<br />
CONSTR 7<br />
+ 0.046 BH + 1 QI + 1 L + 1 M + 1 IM + 1.2 K + 1.143 BL<br />
= 736000<br />
CONSTR 9<br />
+ 0.12 BH + 0.026 QI + 0.026 L + 0.026 M + 0.031 IM<br />
+ 0.031 K + 0.028 BL = 26000<br />
CONSTR 11<br />
+ 0.547 BH + 0.026 QI + 0.06 L + 0.06 M + 0.07 IM + 0.07 K<br />
+ 0.07 BL = 6300<br />
CONSTR 13<br />
+ 0.522 QI + 0.575 L + 0.56 M + 0.297 IM + 0.267 K<br />
124
+ 0.313 BL = 330000<br />
+ 0.05 1M + 0.05 K = 1000<br />
+ 0.02 1M +<br />
CONSTR 18<br />
0.02 K + 0.02 BL = 6000<br />
+ 0.005 1M +<br />
CONSTR 20<br />
0.025 K + 0.018 BL = 0<br />
+ 0.293 1M +<br />
CONSTR 22<br />
0.323 K + 0.27 BL = 80000<br />
+ 1 Q1 >= 0<br />
CONSTR 24<br />
+ 1 L >=<br />
CONSTR 25<br />
0<br />
+ 1 M
29 CONSTR 22 18353.0000 0.0000<br />
30 CONSTR 23 4152.7340 0.0000<br />
31 CONSTR 24 391107.0000 0.0000<br />
32 CONSTR 25 4950.0000 0.0000<br />
34 CONSTR 27 209900.0000 0.0000<br />
35 CONSTR 28 109900.0000 0.0000<br />
37 CONSTR 30 82111.1200 0.0000<br />
Objective Function Value = 314870100<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery crude oil optimization<br />
SENSITIVIlYANALYSIS OF COST COEFFICIENTS<br />
Variable<br />
Current<br />
Coeff.<br />
Allowable<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
Allowable<br />
Maximum<br />
1 BH 898.0000 -Inf<strong>in</strong>ity 4776.0210<br />
2 QI 797.0000 453.0667 Inf<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
3 L 393.0000 257.2369 786.7452<br />
4 M 410.0000 -Inf<strong>in</strong>ity 507.3396<br />
5 IM 245.0000 -2376.7240 Inf<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
6 K 804.0000 -Inf<strong>in</strong>ity 5138.1720<br />
7 BL 657.0000 -3243.7550 10095.2100<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the values are not real, try<strong>in</strong>g to read mean<strong>in</strong>g from the numerical result is<br />
of less importance and hence it is not done. It has been shown that the problem given<br />
both optimal results and sensitivity analysis. This is <strong>in</strong>dented to give the mode of<br />
selection of crude oil for maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the profit of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery by select<strong>in</strong>g proper<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation of crude oils. The LP is developed for 100% efficiency. But ref<strong>in</strong>ery like KRL<br />
iswork<strong>in</strong>g on more than 100% efficiency. Another LP must be developed for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
ifitiswork<strong>in</strong>gmore than 100% efficiency.The same LP will not be suitable because some<br />
crude oils are be<strong>in</strong>g processed <strong>in</strong> the maximum capacity. So the variability is limited to a<br />
few varieties. That is why another model is developed for the purpose.<br />
4.6 Ship Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Model<br />
The crude oil brought to the jetty <strong>in</strong> sea tankers is pumped to ref<strong>in</strong>ery through<br />
pipel<strong>in</strong>e. This pipel<strong>in</strong>e passes through the heart of the city. In 1971, when the pipel<strong>in</strong>es<br />
were laid the city was small but now because of the growth of the city, the capacity<br />
expansion of the pipel<strong>in</strong>es is almost impossible. Ifthe capacity of the <strong>in</strong>put pipel<strong>in</strong>e has<br />
to be expanded the expenses will be exorbitantly high. So it will not be economical to go<br />
for it. The pipel<strong>in</strong>es for pump<strong>in</strong>g crude oil is therefore one of the major bottlenecks of the<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
The port under consideration is not hav<strong>in</strong>g the facility for receiv<strong>in</strong>g all types of<br />
vessels because of the draft and turn<strong>in</strong>g circle limitations. Due to limitations <strong>in</strong> port<br />
facility and draft, COT cannot receive Suez-max and VLCC vessels. So the crude brought<br />
126
<strong>in</strong>bigvessels need to be shared with other near by ref<strong>in</strong>eries. While shar<strong>in</strong>g crude oil, the<br />
measurement as well as the quality of the crude changes. This ref<strong>in</strong>ery be<strong>in</strong>g at the<br />
southern end of India will be gett<strong>in</strong>g only the last part of the crude, which will be hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
large part of the sediments and water. The depth of the channel to the port is not enough<br />
to br<strong>in</strong>gships at all times of the year. In monsoon time the draft will be low and the crude<br />
oil supply will be very much disturbed due to the draft problem. They can br<strong>in</strong>g only<br />
small ships <strong>in</strong> the monsoon season. So weather is another bottleneck for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Under the above constra<strong>in</strong>ts as a short-term solution the exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities had to be<br />
made best use of. A good schedule of ships carry<strong>in</strong>g crude with m<strong>in</strong>imum overlap would<br />
be the best. The demurrage charges to be paid to ships under these conditions would be<br />
the m<strong>in</strong>imum.<br />
4.6.1 The Problem Characteristics<br />
The objectives of a good crude ship schedule should be two fold, the first be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
able to meet the crude oil requirements of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery and the second do<strong>in</strong>g the above at<br />
the least cost. The variable costs are the ones need<strong>in</strong>g control, and <strong>in</strong> this case it is the<br />
ship charges for the unload<strong>in</strong>g days. (The total days of the ship spends at unload<strong>in</strong>g port<br />
is taken as unload<strong>in</strong>g days and this <strong>in</strong>cludes time spent wait<strong>in</strong>g for the free berth). In the<br />
DSS modelthat we have developed, only the ship cost/ton for unload<strong>in</strong>g days is taken to<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d the m<strong>in</strong>imum. The ship schedules that do not meet the ref<strong>in</strong>ery crude need<br />
satisfaction criteria should not be considered for evaluation by this model. The monthly<br />
ship demurrage paid to crude tankers now is <strong>in</strong> the range of 20 lac /month, It is the huge<br />
demurrage costs that we propose to reduce by select<strong>in</strong>g good ship schedules.<br />
This meet<strong>in</strong>g is held after the ICM every month with Oil Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Committee<br />
(OCC), <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation (lOC) (Shipp<strong>in</strong>g), Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Corporation of India and the<br />
representatives from each ref<strong>in</strong>ery attend<strong>in</strong>g it. The aim of this meet<strong>in</strong>g is to f<strong>in</strong>alize the<br />
Crude allocation to each ref<strong>in</strong>ery by decid<strong>in</strong>g the crude type and parcel size for different<br />
tankers, allott<strong>in</strong>g them to different ref<strong>in</strong>eries and schedul<strong>in</strong>g their arrivals at discharge<br />
ports. The crude requirement for next month of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery projected <strong>in</strong> the ICM is<br />
after consolidation by OCC (Technical) given to IOC (IT). They obta<strong>in</strong> quotes for crude.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>itial crude shipp<strong>in</strong>g schedule is then made <strong>in</strong> consultation with IOC (Shipp<strong>in</strong>g).<br />
Here, a model that takes as <strong>in</strong>put, data regard<strong>in</strong>g crude and crude tanker availability<br />
from load ports, crude requirement of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery and lay days available at load and<br />
discharge ports and gives as output an optimum crude allotment schedule is used. This<br />
schedule gives the type and quantity of crude allotted to the tanker schedule to reach the<br />
127
4.6.3 Solution Methodologies<br />
The complex nature of this problem requires a model that can effectivelytake <strong>in</strong>to<br />
account, the queu<strong>in</strong>g of Ship at sea, and the times for which a Ship will have to wait for<br />
the tide for movement, for optimization of the system. Mathematical models fail to<br />
capture such complexity. A survey of literature shows that computer simulation is a<br />
widely used tool for port related studies. We have used simulation as a tool for solv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
this problem. The steps followed by us are given below:<br />
(1) Understand<strong>in</strong>g the crude oil movement system from the ships at high sea to<br />
the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
(2) Detailed understand<strong>in</strong>g of various subsystems such as Ships, tugs, port<br />
formalities, etc<br />
(3) F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out various constra<strong>in</strong>ts of the system.<br />
(4) Time and other data collection for various Ships such as draft required empty<br />
and full, travel times, ships unload<strong>in</strong>g times etc., and process<strong>in</strong>g them for the<br />
use <strong>in</strong> simulation.<br />
(s) Develop<strong>in</strong>ga simulation model, verification and validation of the same.<br />
(6) Developthe DSS <strong>in</strong>terface with the user and mak<strong>in</strong>g the report<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />
4.6.4 Simulation Model<br />
130<br />
Figure 4.7 Event graph
A simulation model is developed us<strong>in</strong>g SIGMA, details of which are available <strong>in</strong><br />
Schruben, a commercially available discrete event simulation package based on event<br />
graph representation of models, converted it <strong>in</strong>to Pascal, modified it and <strong>in</strong>corporated<br />
the Ship load<strong>in</strong>g and unload<strong>in</strong>g rules to get a basic crude ship unload<strong>in</strong>g simulation<br />
model that formed the base of the DSS model used to f<strong>in</strong>d the monthly cost/ton for a<br />
given ship schedule. The event graph for the basic ship-schedul<strong>in</strong>g model is given <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 4.7. A brief description of the events represented by the nodes of the event is given<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table 4.8 . The model uses follow<strong>in</strong>gassumptions:<br />
• The tide data used has been taken from the tide Table of 1999.<br />
• The pilot and tugs are available at any time.<br />
Table4.8 Descnptlon<br />
0 events In even: graPIh 0fth e simu . Iation modl e<br />
Node Name Description<br />
EDDAY Marks end ofday and writes daily statistics <strong>in</strong>output file<br />
SETIER Resets the variables used for collect<strong>in</strong>g daily statistics<br />
ETIDE Locates the appropriate start<strong>in</strong>g low and high tides for the day<br />
DRAFT Reads the subsequent low and high tide values atappropriate times<br />
STDRFT Sets the movement times <strong>in</strong>creek for all Ships depend<strong>in</strong>g on tide<br />
SHIPAR Represents arrival ofa ship atan anchorage location<br />
SHIPLV Ship leaves the Anchorage ifcompletely empty<br />
CKTIDE Check for tide for sail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to creek<br />
SAlLSTR Start sail<strong>in</strong>g through Creek towards Jetty if Tide permits<br />
RHBRTH The loaded Ship reaches the Jetty and prepares toberth<br />
BRTH Ship berths atJetty and starts unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />
EDUNLD Unload<strong>in</strong>g ofShip isover<br />
LEVBTH The Ship isready to leave the berth after unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />
LEVJTY Check if tide iffavorable toleave the Jetty<br />
MOVBAC Ship starts sail<strong>in</strong>g back<br />
BKACH Back toHigh Sea Anchorage<br />
TRIGER Trigger RETRY and WAIT nodes when favor<strong>in</strong>g tide occurs<br />
RETRY Trigger movement ofwait<strong>in</strong>g full Ship through channel when tide favors<br />
WAIT Start movement ofwait<strong>in</strong>g empty Ship through channel when tide favours<br />
NIGHT End ofNight<br />
DAY End ofdaylight occurs<br />
131
Input the next ship schedule tobe evaluated.<br />
Run the crude ship unload<strong>in</strong>g simulation model with the ship schedule <strong>in</strong>put and getthe cost per<br />
ton and other details.<br />
Save the cost I ton values forthe schedule.<br />
NO<br />
YES<br />
Compare the cost per ton forall qiven schedules and select the one with lowest cost.<br />
STOP<br />
Figure4.8. Flow chart show<strong>in</strong>g logicused <strong>in</strong> ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g optimization model<br />
4.6.5 Model Validation<br />
We have used the white box method of validation. In this method the actual logic<br />
of operation was compared with that followed <strong>in</strong> the simulation model to make them the<br />
same. For this the detailed schedule of ship unload<strong>in</strong>g for the month shown below was<br />
compared with what would happen <strong>in</strong> reality for both sequence of events and their times<br />
ofoccurrence and the model was validated.<br />
132
12.0 45000.0 11.8 15.8 17.0 5.2<br />
13.0 45000.0 12.7 17.4 18.6 6.0<br />
17.0 45000.0 16.7 19.0 20.3 3.5<br />
17.0 45000.0 16.7 20.6 21.9 5.1<br />
18.0 45000.0 17.9 22.2 23.5 5.5<br />
22.0 45000.0 22.0 24.1 25.3 3.3<br />
24.0 45000.0 23.6 25.7 26.9 3.4<br />
26.0 45000.0 25.8 27.3 28.6 2.8<br />
28.0 45000.0 27.9 28.9 30.2 2.3<br />
Summary of the statistics of this SIMULATION run<br />
Number of Crude Tankers that arrived =18<br />
MINIMUM stay of a crude tanker at Kochi was for 1.5 days<br />
AVERAGE stay of a crude tanker at Kochi was for 4.5 days<br />
MAXIMUM stay of a crude tanker at Kochi was for 7.4 days<br />
TOTAL COSTof ship hire for unload<strong>in</strong>g days Rupees 40800000.00<br />
AVERAGE ship hire cost per ton for the period is Rupees 50.37per Ton<br />
It is demonstrated <strong>in</strong> this section how a simulation model run with different<br />
parameters and coupled with a search technique can be used as an optimiz<strong>in</strong>g decision<br />
support system. Such models can be of great help <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g complex decisions such as the<br />
optimal ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g. The models made for such specific tasks can also be modified to<br />
evaluate different alternative changes or improvements proposed <strong>in</strong> the system studied.<br />
The analyst has however to be very careful <strong>in</strong> the verification and validation of the<br />
models used on which all the results depend. A word of caution is necessary at this stage,<br />
the results presented <strong>in</strong> this paper are case specific because of the cost, time, logic and<br />
other case specific data <strong>in</strong> the model. What is more general and of <strong>in</strong>terest to<br />
practitioners <strong>in</strong> the field should be the methodology and the models used by us, which<br />
can bereplicated and used <strong>in</strong> similar cases elsewhere.<br />
4.7. Internal Logistics Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Internal logistics deals with the delivery of crude oil from storage tanks,<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil, <strong>in</strong>termediate storage of streams, f<strong>in</strong>al storage of products and<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g of products. Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance plans of all the equipment will affect the performance<br />
of<strong>in</strong>ternal logistics.<br />
4.7.1. Flexibility of storage tanks<br />
The production plann<strong>in</strong>g decides what types of crude to be processed on each day<br />
and depends on the plann<strong>in</strong>g as discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Tanks are grouped together for<br />
the purpose of storage of products. The group<strong>in</strong>g is ma<strong>in</strong>ly on the basis of connectivity.<br />
135
Sequence of utilization of tanks, which tank must be filled first and which must be<br />
the second and so on. This <strong>in</strong>formation will reduce the operation effort as well as easy<br />
discharge of products as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.10.<br />
It also must give desirable number of tanks to be grouped for easy operations. It<br />
will also take care of fluctuation <strong>in</strong> the product demand.It must also give ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
schedule for the tanks. Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of tanks is time consum<strong>in</strong>g processes. So it must be<br />
planned <strong>in</strong> advance for less disturbance to the supply cha<strong>in</strong> system.<br />
4.7.2 Process<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil<br />
Decision on process<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil is dependent on the quality of crude, quantity<br />
of crude, ratio of each crude products planned, availability of storage capacity for each<br />
product and product specification.<br />
Quantity of<br />
crude<br />
Information on<br />
previous process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Quality of<br />
crude<br />
Product<br />
Variety<br />
Demand for<br />
products<br />
CRUDE PROCESSING<br />
Flgure4.11 Crude process<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />
Specification of<br />
products<br />
Storage<br />
capacity<br />
Information (data)<br />
gather<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Almost all ref<strong>in</strong>eries have automatic process control. All the controls can be made<br />
from the control room. In the supply cha<strong>in</strong> angle, improvement of process will yield<br />
comparatively lesser returns. So <strong>in</strong> this study improvement <strong>in</strong> process is not considered.<br />
As per records of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery (Annual report, KRL, 2002) it is work<strong>in</strong>g at more than<br />
100% rated capacity for the last few years. This also <strong>in</strong>dicates that the scope for<br />
improvement <strong>in</strong> process will be limited.<br />
137
4.7.3 Blend<strong>in</strong>g of products.<br />
Distillates with correct specification cannot be directly obta<strong>in</strong>ed from distillation<br />
streams. Specification varies with customer and use. Specification of products changes<br />
with many parameters and they cannot be corrected directly <strong>in</strong> the distillation column.<br />
Solution to this problem is blend<strong>in</strong>g of streams to get the correct specification. The<br />
commonly adopted blend<strong>in</strong>g procedures are given below.<br />
• Batch blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Partial <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Off unit blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Base stock blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Batch Blend<strong>in</strong>g is done <strong>in</strong> tanks. One tank will be filled up to 90% of its capacity<br />
from the distillation column. Specification of the products will be tested <strong>in</strong> the<br />
laboratory. Laboratory will suggest the streams to be added to the tank for gett<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
correct specification. Blend<strong>in</strong>g is done separately for each tank and its control is manual.<br />
Partial <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g is done by controll<strong>in</strong>g the flow to the collection tanks.<br />
Initial blend<strong>in</strong>g is done by add<strong>in</strong>g multiple stream products to the blend<strong>in</strong>g tank and<br />
correct<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend after f<strong>in</strong>al lab analysis with small quantities of f<strong>in</strong>al touchup<br />
streams. This is also a manually controlled system.<br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g is done by controll<strong>in</strong>g the flows of streams from<br />
different process or tanks to get the specification. This is normally done <strong>in</strong> the time of<br />
delivery of products. Products from distillation columns will be stored <strong>in</strong> tanks and their<br />
specification will be noted. Depends on the demand for the f<strong>in</strong>al product, the volume of<br />
each <strong>in</strong>gredient will be admitted to the flow. Blend<strong>in</strong>g is tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> the pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>al product, which is delivered, will be with correct specification. This is good for<br />
products with variation <strong>in</strong> specification. When the products are supplied to different<br />
markets, <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g will be ideal. Such complicated blend<strong>in</strong>g systems are best<br />
controlled fullyby computer.<br />
Off unit blend<strong>in</strong>g is done at distant location where the product specification is not<br />
sure. For example export of product is tak<strong>in</strong>g place from port. Storage facility is provided<br />
near the port. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery will not know when the shipment will take place and to which<br />
dest<strong>in</strong>ation. Dest<strong>in</strong>ation and customer decides the specification. It will be difficult to<br />
keep products with specification suitable for all customers. So basic streams will be<br />
138
stored <strong>in</strong> the tanks and the blend<strong>in</strong>g will take place only at the time of load<strong>in</strong>g to ship or<br />
it will be blended <strong>in</strong> to a different tank before load<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Base -stockblend<strong>in</strong>g is the blend<strong>in</strong>g of different types of crude oils to get products<br />
with required specification. This method will not give the correct specification still m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
corrections will be good enough to have the required specification. The process of<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g is easier <strong>in</strong> this method. The major disadvantage is the base stock variety<br />
requirement.<br />
Variation <strong>in</strong>market<br />
demand ..<br />
Quantity <strong>in</strong>demand<br />
Storage capacity<br />
Level ofautomation<br />
..<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g decision model<br />
Type ofblend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Figure 4.12 Blend<strong>in</strong>g decision mak<strong>in</strong>g model<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g method cannot be changed very easily after select<strong>in</strong>g one. So the<br />
selection must be made very carefully. The major factors to be considered are given<br />
below. Variation <strong>in</strong> Market demand: Variation <strong>in</strong> specification of products is major factor<br />
to be considered for the selection of blend<strong>in</strong>g technique. If the company is plann<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
supply markets <strong>in</strong> different areas then the product specification will be different.<br />
Frequent changes <strong>in</strong> specification also may be required. Then on l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g will be<br />
ideal butlevelof automation affects the consistency of specification.<br />
Quantity <strong>in</strong> demand: If large quantity of product is required for a longer<br />
period, then batch blend<strong>in</strong>g also will be enough. Blended products can be stored because<br />
the demand is assured.<br />
Storage capacity: storage capacity requirement will be more if the blended<br />
products are stored <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. It will require less storage capacity if basic streams<br />
are stored. Aga<strong>in</strong>it depends on the demand, quantity and variety.<br />
Level of automation: Level of automation is to be considered for types of<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g. Batchblend<strong>in</strong>g requires less automation where as <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g high level of<br />
automation is required for better performance.<br />
A decision mak<strong>in</strong>g model will give a better solution because many blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
methods are available and a variety of constra<strong>in</strong>ts are also available.<br />
139
4.8 Outbound Logistic Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Outbound logistic plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves the plann<strong>in</strong>g of transport <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
selection of mode of transport, total quantity to be moved, quantity to be moved <strong>in</strong> each<br />
mode of transport, and types of products to be moved. Load<strong>in</strong>g system selection is a<br />
design problem. The performance of the system depends on the efficiency of the system.<br />
Region wise demand of products must be decided on the basis of the consumption <strong>in</strong><br />
each retail outlet. The consumption decides the quantity to be transported to the<br />
location. This necessitates the selection of mode of transport, which is discussed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
next section<br />
4.8.1.Transport Mode Selection Model<br />
Selection of mode for movement of ref<strong>in</strong>ed product is another area, which can<br />
contribute to profit. Selection must be made from the commonly used modes- pipel<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
ship, wagon and truck. All modes except pipel<strong>in</strong>e have a m<strong>in</strong>imum charge for<br />
transport<strong>in</strong>g the product.<br />
Truck transport<strong>in</strong>g can be taken as an example.<br />
Table 4.10 Calculation cost<strong>in</strong> truck transport<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imum charge A Rs.500.00<br />
Quantity Transported B 12,000 kilograms<br />
Distance transported C 100 kms (assumed)<br />
Rate per kilometer D Rs. 0.9023nit<br />
Total (A+ BxCx D) E Rs.10821·<br />
Table 4.11 DSS fortransport mode'selectlon<br />
Mode<br />
M<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Cost<br />
Qty. Disl. Rate Total<br />
Pipel<strong>in</strong>e A B C D E<br />
Ship A B C D E<br />
Wagon A B C D E<br />
Truck A B C D E<br />
Total cost of all the modes of transport can be calculated like this. Calculation can<br />
be made accurately by the help of spreadsheet as given <strong>in</strong> Table 4.9. Decision to select<br />
mode of transport can be taken very easily by compar<strong>in</strong>g the total cost and select<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
mode with m<strong>in</strong>imum cost. So this model can be taken as a DSS <strong>in</strong> the outbound logistics.<br />
A few places are considered for establish<strong>in</strong>g the feasibility of the transportation<br />
mode selection model. Product supply<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ery is situated at Kochi. Places considered<br />
for studyare Thiruvanathapuram, Kollam, Chennai, and Kolkata.<br />
Thiruvanathapuram needs supply of veriety of products like MS, diesel,<br />
bitumen, etc. Distance from Kochi is taken as Table 4.12 Cost to Trivandrum<br />
340 km. Requirement of quantity of all items<br />
added together is 600000 liters. This must be<br />
distributed to different outlets. Central<br />
140<br />
M<strong>in</strong>. Cost Rate! Km Total<br />
Pipel<strong>in</strong>e --- ---- ---<br />
Ship 300000 250 351000<br />
Waaon 200000 320 265280<br />
Truck 500 .9023 184570
storage facility is not available at Thiruvanathapuram. Ifrailway wagons have to be used,<br />
then the distribution to retail outlets will <strong>in</strong>cur additional cost. Model gives the solution<br />
as truck transport through road because that is hav<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong>imum total cost.<br />
KoUam needs supply of naphtha <strong>in</strong> bulk quantity for the power plant and small<br />
quantity of MS and diesel. MS and diesel can be transported us<strong>in</strong>g trucks because the<br />
distance is small and delivery is at different Table 4.13 Cost to Kollam<br />
locations. Quantity requirement of all the items<br />
except naphtha is 596000 liters and the distance<br />
transported is 285 km. From Table 4.13 it is<br />
clear that pipel<strong>in</strong>e is the economic mode for<br />
M<strong>in</strong>. Cost Rate! Km Total<br />
Pipel<strong>in</strong>e 50000<br />
Ship 300000 250 342500<br />
Wagon 200000 320 254360<br />
Irruck 500 .9023 153800<br />
naphtha transportation. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t delivery and large quantity regular supply makes<br />
the pipel<strong>in</strong>e transfer viable. Cost for <strong>in</strong>stallation of pipel<strong>in</strong>e is distributed for 10 years for<br />
the purpose of calculat<strong>in</strong>g the cost of transfer through pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Chennai needs supply of all type of products <strong>in</strong> large quantities at times. The<br />
demand is not consistent. Chennai has the port facility also to handle ships. Bulk storage<br />
facility is also available at chennai. So any mode<br />
oftransport is technically feasible for Chennai.<br />
Demand from Chennai is dependent on supply<br />
from local ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Average consumption is<br />
600000 litres and the distance to chennai is<br />
Table 4.14 Cost to Chennai<br />
M<strong>in</strong>. Cost Rate! Km Total<br />
Pipel<strong>in</strong>e ---------<br />
Ship 300000 250 397500<br />
Wagon 200000 320 324800<br />
Truck 500 .9023 353400<br />
taken 650 km. When they cannot meet the demand, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery at Kochi must meet it.<br />
From the Table 4.14 it is clear that both sea and railway wagons are better options for<br />
Chennai.<br />
Kolkata also requires supply of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products from Kochi occationally. A<br />
permanent set up like pipel<strong>in</strong>e will not be Table 415 Cost to Kolkata<br />
feasible. It is clear from the Table 4.15 that the<br />
most economic mode of transport to Kolkata is<br />
ship. Kolkata is also hav<strong>in</strong>g seaport and<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g and storage facilities at port. Distance<br />
M<strong>in</strong>. Cost Rate! Km Total<br />
Pipel<strong>in</strong>e -----<br />
Ship 300000 25C 675000<br />
Wagon 200000 320 680000<br />
Truck 500 .9023 1353950<br />
from Kochi to Kolkata is taken as 3000 km for calculation and the quantity to be<br />
transported is taken as 500000 liters.<br />
141
4.9 CONCLUSION<br />
Logistic problem was divided <strong>in</strong> to two stages namely design and plann<strong>in</strong>g. Areas,<br />
which can not be improved after <strong>in</strong>stallation, are design stage problems. Plann<strong>in</strong>g is done<br />
for both facility deign and operation. For improv<strong>in</strong>g the effectiveness of plann<strong>in</strong>g, it is<br />
aga<strong>in</strong> sub-classified <strong>in</strong> to annual plan, roll<strong>in</strong>g plan, and daily plan. Decisions to be taken<br />
ateach level were identified <strong>in</strong> the plan zone with respect to <strong>in</strong>bound logistics, <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
logistics, and outbound logistics. A hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g model was developed for giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
aclearpicture of decisions to be taken at each stage. This will also give an idea about the<br />
source of <strong>in</strong>put data for plann<strong>in</strong>g. Source of <strong>in</strong>formation can be either from previous plan<br />
period or from outside the plann<strong>in</strong>g system. Model developed will help <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the sequence <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g. Tools required for plann<strong>in</strong>g at each stage were identified and<br />
separated <strong>in</strong> to annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, short term plann<strong>in</strong>g and daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. These are given<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table form for the easy reference. Demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g is the first stage <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Demand for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products is not the same every month. It changes with seasons and<br />
socio-economic conditions. So a model was developed to make the forecast<strong>in</strong>g better and<br />
more reliable. In the model consumption of products <strong>in</strong> the previous years was taken as<br />
the <strong>in</strong>put data. A six-step approach to demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g is developed for the<br />
implementation of the model <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of forecast with all plann<strong>in</strong>g areas of<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> is essential to have better plann<strong>in</strong>g. This six-step approach will help <strong>in</strong><br />
achiev<strong>in</strong>g it. Crude selection and purchase is another important function <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Due to the l<strong>in</strong>ear nature of the problem an LPP was developed to solve the problem.<br />
Maximiz<strong>in</strong>g net back was the objective function. Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery will have different set of<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts. An example of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited (KRL) was taken for verify<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
applicability of the model. Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude oil to the ref<strong>in</strong>ery is the next important<br />
function. This function is also hav<strong>in</strong>g a number of variables like tide <strong>in</strong> the port. A<br />
simulation model was developed for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g. The model will give number of<br />
ships to be brought and the associated cost for br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude oil. This model can be used<br />
as DSS for ship selection with m<strong>in</strong>imum demurrage payment to the shipp<strong>in</strong>g company.<br />
Internal logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure was also discussed <strong>in</strong> this section to reduce starv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and block<strong>in</strong>g of facilities <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the facilities are tightly coupled so<br />
the freedom for flexibility was limited for logistic purposes. Modes of transport for<br />
product <strong>in</strong> outbound logistics are also analyzed and a model is developed for select<strong>in</strong>g<br />
transport mode to a particular place for def<strong>in</strong>ite quantity and variety of products. These<br />
models will help <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g systematic plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and<br />
outbound logistics.<br />
142
5.1 Introduction<br />
CHAPTER V<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> and<br />
Information Technology<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management system has three major components. They are<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation flow, material flow, and cash flow. SCM systems are used to improve<br />
the speed and accuracy of <strong>in</strong>formation flow to make system effective and<br />
efficient, and to make fast and reliable cash flow. Functional requirements to<br />
achieve the above are discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />
Information Technology is the backbone of success of any SCM system,<br />
Cachon and Fisher [2000]. The development <strong>in</strong> cost reduction started from<br />
efficient utilization of facilities us<strong>in</strong>g statistical tools. With the predicted demand<br />
it sub-optimizes at different levels to m<strong>in</strong>imize the cost of production plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and schedul<strong>in</strong>g of everyth<strong>in</strong>g on the basis of product consumption <strong>in</strong> the market,<br />
[P<strong>in</strong>to and Grossmann, 1998]. Consumption of customer is monitored on real<br />
time basis and that <strong>in</strong>formation is used for plann<strong>in</strong>g and reschedul<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
production, [Sah<strong>in</strong>idis and Grossman.ioci]. Movement of material from supplier<br />
retailer is on the basis of the new schedule. A strong support of computer<br />
network is essential for the success of SCM. Intranet, extranet and Internet can<br />
be used for the data collection and convert<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to useful <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Suggestion for us<strong>in</strong>g these technologies <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is given <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Data<br />
generation is another important area where ref<strong>in</strong>eries need a lot of impert<strong>in</strong>ence.<br />
Same data is reproduced at different functional levels and this reduces the<br />
authenticityof <strong>in</strong>formation. Once data is generated, data must be used from the<br />
source itself at all functional levels, [Thonemann.zooa]. It will reduce<br />
redundancy of data. Ma<strong>in</strong> data generation is production department and<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g, operation and control departments use it. Data generation and flow<br />
management<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g operation and control is discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />
143
U Problem and objective<br />
<strong>Management</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Petroleum</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eers, ma<strong>in</strong>ly chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eers. S<strong>in</strong>ce they are technically tra<strong>in</strong>ed their<br />
focus ismostly on ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g operations and its improvement. Logistics is sidel<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
Therefore <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> related data collection, record<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
generation are the weak areas <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Data collection and entry <strong>in</strong> to the<br />
computer is not made at the place of supply cha<strong>in</strong> operation. Repetition of data<br />
collection and entry by different agencies is also common. This creates problems<br />
specially when there is difference between the values of the same data collected<br />
by different agencies. Lack of common standard norms of data collection and<br />
<strong>in</strong>sufficient network<strong>in</strong>g and data shar<strong>in</strong>g is the ma<strong>in</strong> reason for this type of error.<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>formation flow model for mak<strong>in</strong>g seM software for a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery is the ma<strong>in</strong> objective of this chapter. Detailed study is made on the data<br />
collection methods at all stages from customer to the crude oil supplier and<br />
convert<strong>in</strong>g them to <strong>in</strong>formation to be used for decision mak<strong>in</strong>g at different levels<br />
of management <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Ma<strong>in</strong> features required for the software are also<br />
discussed. Information flow at each module level must be developed and they<br />
must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated to get a complete <strong>in</strong>formation flow model. Different<br />
Information System tools and Technologies used <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
are alsopresented <strong>in</strong> this chapter. The areas where each of these can be used <strong>in</strong> a<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery supply cha<strong>in</strong> are also po<strong>in</strong>ted out here.<br />
5.3 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Components.<br />
The nature of bus<strong>in</strong>ess enterprise is chang<strong>in</strong>g. Today's bus<strong>in</strong>ess is<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly "boundary less" mean<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>ternal functional barriers are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
eroded <strong>in</strong> favour of horizontal process management. The separation between<br />
suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and customers is reduc<strong>in</strong>g. This is the idea<br />
of extended enterprise, which is transform<strong>in</strong>g organization to complete <strong>in</strong> the<br />
market. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Bowersox and Daugherty (1995), characteristics of modern<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> are flexibility, quick response, reliability, and adaptability.<br />
144
10% Profit 11% Profit 5% Profit 6% Profit<br />
40%<br />
Production<br />
Value<br />
addition<br />
20%<br />
Logistic Logistic<br />
Figure 5.2 Effect of sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> logistic onprofitcompared to output improvement<br />
There is considerable scope <strong>in</strong> many ref<strong>in</strong>eries for better management of<br />
logistics costs and hence for profit leverage. Figure 5.2 highlights the possibility<br />
of improv<strong>in</strong>g profit when profit marg<strong>in</strong>s are low relative to distribution costs. A<br />
hidden cost of logistics is the <strong>in</strong>terest charged on <strong>in</strong>ventory, tanks, and pipel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Because this is rarely separately identified by most management account<strong>in</strong>g<br />
systems. Any reduction <strong>in</strong> hidden cost will directly <strong>in</strong>crease profit. So<br />
improvement <strong>in</strong> efficiencyof logistics is easy and urgent area for competitiveness<br />
<strong>in</strong> the market.<br />
The value cha<strong>in</strong> activities (Figure 5.3) can be categorized as <strong>in</strong>bound<br />
logistics, <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics, outbound logistics, and market<strong>in</strong>g and sales. To ga<strong>in</strong><br />
competitiveadvantage over its rivals, a ref<strong>in</strong>ery must deliver value to its customer<br />
through perform<strong>in</strong>g these activities more effectively than its competitors or by<br />
perform<strong>in</strong>g the activities <strong>in</strong> a unique way that creates greater differentiation.<br />
Logistic management has the potential to assist the organization <strong>in</strong> the<br />
achievement of both cost/productivity advantage and a value advantage<br />
Inbound<br />
Logistics<br />
Figure 5.3 The value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
Operations<br />
& Internal<br />
Logistics<br />
146<br />
Outbound<br />
Logistics
5.3.1.1. Inbound Logistics<br />
Inbound logistics <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong>volves locat<strong>in</strong>g crude oil supplier, mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the contract, and arrang<strong>in</strong>g shipment from supplier to the purchaser, facility<br />
management <strong>in</strong> the unload<strong>in</strong>g port, and transport<strong>in</strong>g from unload<strong>in</strong>g port to<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eryand storage at ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Published data is available to get details on quality of crude oil of each<br />
location <strong>in</strong> different part of the world. Suitable and economic crude can be<br />
selectedand the ref<strong>in</strong>ery can enter <strong>in</strong>to purchase agreement. Purchase agreement<br />
can be either long term or spot purchase. Once purchase is made schedule of<br />
delivery can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed and shipp<strong>in</strong>g companies can be contacted for<br />
transport<strong>in</strong>g. Many shipp<strong>in</strong>g companies are do<strong>in</strong>g this crude oil transport<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
different capacity ships. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the crude demand and facility at<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g port, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery can select the right type of ship through shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
agents. Manag<strong>in</strong>g facilities at unload<strong>in</strong>g port <strong>in</strong>cludes check<strong>in</strong>g of draft with port<br />
trust, availability of port facility, pilots, and availability of tugs. Normally these<br />
arrangements are done through shipp<strong>in</strong>g agents. Ref<strong>in</strong>eries do not directly<br />
<strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong>to shipp<strong>in</strong>g activities, they will entrust clear<strong>in</strong>g and forward<strong>in</strong>g agents<br />
with the schedule of ship arrivals. Followup of ship arrivals also will be done by<br />
clear<strong>in</strong>g and forward<strong>in</strong>g agent at unload<strong>in</strong>g port. Transport<strong>in</strong>g from port to<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eryis usually through pipel<strong>in</strong>e. These will be exclusivepipel<strong>in</strong>es for crude oil<br />
transport<strong>in</strong>g from port to ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Logistic management has the potential to assist a ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> the<br />
achievement of both cost and productivity advantage and value advantage. Figure<br />
5.4suggest ways <strong>in</strong> which productivity can be enhanced through logisticsand the<br />
prospects for ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a value advantage <strong>in</strong> the market place through customer<br />
service. In short the ref<strong>in</strong>eries that will be the leader <strong>in</strong> the market of the future<br />
will be those that have sought and achieved the tw<strong>in</strong> peaks of excellence: they<br />
havega<strong>in</strong>ed both cost leadership and serviceleadership.<br />
The under ly<strong>in</strong>g philosophy beh<strong>in</strong>d the logisticsconceptis that of plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation, the materials flow from source to user as an <strong>in</strong>tegrated system<br />
147
ather than manag<strong>in</strong>g the goods flow as a series of <strong>in</strong>dependent activities. Thus<br />
under the logistics management regime the goal is to l<strong>in</strong>k the market place, the<br />
distribution network, the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g processes, and the procurement activity<br />
<strong>in</strong>such a way that<br />
Value advantage<br />
Tailored service<br />
Reliability<br />
Responsiveness<br />
Superior<br />
Customer<br />
Value<br />
Productivity advantage<br />
Logistic leverage opportunities<br />
Capacity utilization<br />
Asset turn<br />
Schedule <strong>in</strong>tearation<br />
Figure 5.4 Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Competitive advantage through supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
customers are serviced at higher levels and yet at lower cost. In other wards to<br />
achieve the goal of competitive advantage through both cost reduction and<br />
service enhancement.<br />
5.3.1.2 Operational and <strong>in</strong>ternal Logistics<br />
In this thesis ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g operations <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is termed as operations.<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> Functions <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> operations are the control of delivery of crude oil<br />
from storage tanks to <strong>in</strong>itial distillation columns, storage of distillates or streams<br />
<strong>in</strong> tanks, treatment of streams for convert<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to products, selection of processes<br />
forgett<strong>in</strong>g products, and blend<strong>in</strong>g operations.<br />
To improve operations management and flexibility, logistics management<br />
must be improved. Flexibility <strong>in</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g from any crude oil tank to any<br />
distillation column and distillation column to any stream tank must be possible.<br />
As on today <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries are designat<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> tanks to store a set of fixed<br />
tanks and normally those tanks are kept filled with blended products. Storage of<br />
148
lended products reduces flexibility and <strong>in</strong>creases storage cost. If streams are<br />
stored <strong>in</strong> tanks, designation of tanks can be m<strong>in</strong>imized and delivery from<br />
distillation columns can be less complicated. This will <strong>in</strong>tern reduce number of<br />
trunks required for storage of products. Moreover a variety of products can be<br />
supplied to customers as per their vary<strong>in</strong>g demand. Internal logistics is a<br />
neglected area <strong>in</strong> almost all ref<strong>in</strong>eries. But <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics only can improve<br />
flexibility. So <strong>in</strong> the near future all <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries will realize the importance of<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal logistics.<br />
5.3.1.3 Outbound Logistics<br />
Outbound logistics <strong>in</strong>volves the movement of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products from<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery to customer. Two methods are <strong>in</strong> practice <strong>in</strong> India. One is ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
directly supply<strong>in</strong>g to the retailer and the other is ref<strong>in</strong>ery supply to market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
companies and they distribute to retailers. For example Reliance Petrochemical<br />
Limited (RPL) is not hav<strong>in</strong>g their own outlets <strong>in</strong>stead they are sell<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Indian</strong><br />
Oil Corporation (lOC). IOC is do<strong>in</strong>g their own ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and market<strong>in</strong>g. Indo<br />
Burma <strong>Petroleum</strong> (IBP) is hav<strong>in</strong>g only market<strong>in</strong>g no ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery like KRL<br />
is hav<strong>in</strong>g very few own outlets and market<strong>in</strong>g is ma<strong>in</strong>ly done by H<strong>in</strong>dustan<br />
<strong>Petroleum</strong> Limited (HPL).<br />
Transportation can be us<strong>in</strong>g pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship, rail or road. As discussed <strong>in</strong><br />
chapter 3, pipe l<strong>in</strong>e is the cheapest for bulk transport<strong>in</strong>g but can not be easily<br />
used for small quantities. Small quantities <strong>in</strong> remote places can be supplied only<br />
through road. Coastal cities can be supplied through sea. The last option for ma<strong>in</strong><br />
cities is rail.<br />
5.3.1.4 Market<strong>in</strong>g and Sales<br />
Market<strong>in</strong>g and sales were not treated as important activities <strong>in</strong> petroleum<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> India because the market was protected and supply was just sufficient<br />
to match the demand. Import of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products were restricted by Government<br />
of India (Gol). April 2002 onwards <strong>Indian</strong> market is not price controlled and not<br />
free from competition. So far companies like RPL were not permitted to market<br />
149
their products <strong>in</strong> India. But now any company can market their own products or<br />
import for market<strong>in</strong>g. This will necessitate extensive market surveys and sales<br />
promotion techniques. Till April 2002, companies were do<strong>in</strong>g market research<br />
and sales promotion only for lubricat<strong>in</strong>g oil. Brand<strong>in</strong>g was also very well done <strong>in</strong><br />
lubricat<strong>in</strong>g oil. Market analysis and research will be essential <strong>in</strong> the near future to<br />
compete with other companies by way of optimiz<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ventory and <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
movement. Sales promotion through <strong>in</strong>creased flexibility of products will be<br />
essential to reta<strong>in</strong> customers. Increas<strong>in</strong>g flexibility <strong>in</strong> product specification is<br />
brand<strong>in</strong>g of petroleum products. That is why ref<strong>in</strong>eries must be equipped to stock<br />
streams <strong>in</strong>stead of blended products. Blended products reduce flexibility <strong>in</strong><br />
address<strong>in</strong>g customer demand. Dealers <strong>in</strong> different locations <strong>in</strong> the country will<br />
demand diesel or petrol of different specification to satisfy their customers to<br />
perform better. So Market<strong>in</strong>g and sales will play an important role <strong>in</strong> the years to<br />
come.<br />
5.3.2 Information Flow<br />
Information is not considered as a major supply cha<strong>in</strong> driver because it<br />
does not have a physical presence <strong>in</strong> the company. Information affects all parts of<br />
the supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> many ways. Information serves, as the connection between<br />
the supply cha<strong>in</strong>'s various stages, allow<strong>in</strong>g them to co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate their actions and<br />
br<strong>in</strong>gs about many of the benefits of maximiz<strong>in</strong>g total supply cha<strong>in</strong> efficiency.<br />
Information is also crucial to the daily operations of each stage <strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> considerations for <strong>in</strong>formation flow are for plann<strong>in</strong>g, for operations,<br />
and for management control.<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation occurs when all the different stages of a supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> works towards the objective of maximiz<strong>in</strong>g total supply cha<strong>in</strong> profitability<br />
rather than each stage devot<strong>in</strong>g itself to its own profitability. Lack of co<br />
ord<strong>in</strong>ation can result <strong>in</strong> a significant loss of supply cha<strong>in</strong> profit. Managers must<br />
decide how to create this co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> and what <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
must be shared <strong>in</strong> order to accomplish this goal. Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation between different<br />
stages <strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong> requires each stage to share appropriate <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
150
5.3.2.1 Information flow for forecast<strong>in</strong>g and plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g is the art and science of mak<strong>in</strong>g projections about what future<br />
needs and conditions will be. Obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forecast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation frequently<br />
means us<strong>in</strong>g sophisticated techniques to estimate future demand or market<br />
condition. Managers must decide how they will make forecasts and to what<br />
extent they will rely on them to make decisions. Ref<strong>in</strong>eries often use forecasts<br />
both on a tactical level to schedule production and on strategic level to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
capacity. Once a ref<strong>in</strong>ery creates a forecast, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery needs a plan to act on<br />
this forecast. Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g transforms forecasts <strong>in</strong>to plans of activity to<br />
satisfy the projected demand. A key decision-maker faces the problem of how to<br />
use strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g both at the stage of manager's stage <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
andthroughout the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery forecast<strong>in</strong>g is ma<strong>in</strong>ly for product demand and crude oil<br />
availability and techniques used for forecast<strong>in</strong>g is discussed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Chapter<br />
4. Information required for forecast<strong>in</strong>g crude oil price and availability is available<br />
on services like Reuters net connection. Full details of crude oil and price are<br />
available <strong>in</strong> the published data. This <strong>in</strong>formation is available to subscribers only.<br />
On the basis of this <strong>in</strong>formation a ref<strong>in</strong>ery can decide up on purchase.<br />
In the APM time demand was projected by Gol and was made available to<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g companies like IOCand ref<strong>in</strong>eries like KRL <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g as<br />
discussed <strong>in</strong> chapter 4. In post APM the demand projection can be the same but<br />
the market share of each company will not be the same. Market<strong>in</strong>g rights were<br />
restricted to a few companies <strong>in</strong> the APM time. But <strong>in</strong> the post APM market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rights are not restricted. Companies like RIL will appear <strong>in</strong> the market with great<br />
power. So, each market<strong>in</strong>g company must do separate demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Even<br />
stand alone ref<strong>in</strong>eries (ref<strong>in</strong>eries without market<strong>in</strong>g setup) will have to do their<br />
own demand forecast because their market<strong>in</strong>g companies demand fluctuation<br />
will affectthe product hold<strong>in</strong>g of the company.<br />
152
Crude price<br />
Demand for products<br />
Crude availability<br />
Figure 5.6 Information flowfor forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
--+ Decision on buy and sell<br />
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
f--+<br />
--+ When? What?<br />
How much? Where?<br />
--+<br />
As given <strong>in</strong> the Figure 5.6 the major <strong>in</strong>puts are from crude oil markets and<br />
product market. Output of forecast<strong>in</strong>g willbe decision on when, where, what, and<br />
howmuch crude oil must be and products must be moved <strong>in</strong> the market.<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g needs more <strong>in</strong>put than forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Plann<strong>in</strong>g based on the <strong>in</strong>puts<br />
from government policy, output of forecast<strong>in</strong>g and availability of facility <strong>in</strong> the<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery takes place at different stages. Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
APM was national level (OEB). Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery target was given for the year<br />
depend<strong>in</strong>g on the capacity of ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Based on OEB suggestions, a monthly plan<br />
was drawn <strong>in</strong> SPM. Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery has to make there own production plann<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
each day. Everyday, a production meet<strong>in</strong>g will be held to analyze the previous<br />
day'sperformance and make plan for the day. Information on condition of facility<br />
like distillation units, availability of tanks, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance schedule etc. must be<br />
available for plann<strong>in</strong>g the day's production. The demand for products also must<br />
be available for decid<strong>in</strong>g on production. Government policy will be <strong>in</strong>timated <strong>in</strong><br />
monthly plan and daily production must be tuned to government policies.<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g decision must directly reach the operations department for schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
operations. Market<strong>in</strong>g effort must be there to m<strong>in</strong>imize the value added<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory. This will necessitate transport plann<strong>in</strong>g. In short daily plann<strong>in</strong>g will<br />
trigger and direct the activities of operations department, market<strong>in</strong>g department,<br />
and stock oil department. In post APM scenario the plann<strong>in</strong>g will be more<br />
difficult because the demand for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products may vary frequently. The<br />
market also need not be same and product quality demand also may change. So<br />
computerized <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation flow may be needed to have better and<br />
accurate plann<strong>in</strong>g so that the efficiency of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery can be improved to<br />
competewith other ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the near by region.<br />
153
5.3.2.2 Information flow for operations<br />
Decision is taken <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g and second stage decision is<br />
taken <strong>in</strong> the department but to implement those decisions, it must be converted<br />
to <strong>in</strong>formation. Right <strong>in</strong>formation must reach the right place to have right course<br />
ofaction. In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery the specification of products are com<strong>in</strong>g from laboratory<br />
and the operations are controlled accord<strong>in</strong>gly. Product patterns are controlled by<br />
process department. Availability of tanks and pipel<strong>in</strong>es are arranged by the stock<br />
and oil department. Products movement is controlled by market<strong>in</strong>g or sales<br />
department if the company is controll<strong>in</strong>g market<strong>in</strong>g. Ifthe ref<strong>in</strong>ery is stand-alone<br />
type, the product movement is controlled by market<strong>in</strong>g company. Integration of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation is essential to have better comb<strong>in</strong>ed performance of all departments.<br />
Datamust be fed to the computer at the source of generation itself and it must be<br />
available at all the places where it is needed. For example, specification of sample<br />
taken from product l<strong>in</strong>e must be made available on computer and blend<strong>in</strong>g steps<br />
for mak<strong>in</strong>g the product <strong>in</strong>to required specification also must be available on the<br />
computer. So the implementation can be faster and data is generated for f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
specification. Information about the quality quantity <strong>in</strong> that tank is available to<br />
allconcerned departments like sales, stock and oil ,and production.<br />
5.3.2.3 Information flow for control<br />
Controll<strong>in</strong>g is a cont<strong>in</strong>uous process of measur<strong>in</strong>g actual results and<br />
compar<strong>in</strong>g with plant results and f<strong>in</strong>d out deviation to take corrective actions.<br />
Major elements of control are (i) Chart out standard of performance (H)<br />
measur<strong>in</strong>g the present performance (Hi) compar<strong>in</strong>g the performance with<br />
standard performance and (iv) tak<strong>in</strong>g corrective steps if deviation is noticed.<br />
In ref<strong>in</strong>ery the performance is normally, measured <strong>in</strong> capacity utilization.<br />
In APM period government used to give <strong>in</strong>centive for production of more than<br />
100 % of <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. Every month the performance can be planned to<br />
match with annual plann<strong>in</strong>g or even weekly plann<strong>in</strong>g can be done. Weekly and<br />
monthly performance can be measured by calculat<strong>in</strong>g cumulative daily<br />
154
performance. At the end of every month the crude oil ref<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> MMT can be<br />
calculated. These values can be easily compared with the planned ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g per<br />
month and if it is less than the planned, corrective action can be taken to<br />
compensate the lost production.<br />
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Government policy<br />
Infrastructure facility<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Figure 5.7 Information flow for plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Operation<br />
Transport<br />
Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The controll<strong>in</strong>g can be done well with a structured <strong>in</strong>formation flow. Daily<br />
production Figures must be entered <strong>in</strong> to the computer from the process<br />
department itself. This data can be used for remedial steps by OEC when they<br />
plan for the next month. Essential qualities of a control system are flexibility,<br />
prompt report<strong>in</strong>g, understandability, and economic feasibility. Control system<br />
must be flexible to have same performance level when plan changes. The reports<br />
must be available to the central <strong>in</strong>formation bank so that all concerned<br />
departments can retrieve the data fort check<strong>in</strong>g with plan and suggestions for<br />
correction if deviation is there.<br />
Input Process<br />
Control<br />
Figure 5.8 Control system<br />
Figure 5.8 shows a flow diagram of <strong>in</strong>formation flow for control. A well<br />
designed control system will help for better performance <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery because<br />
small changes will affect he quality of out put of the product. Small changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />
distillation unit parameters will change the yield pattern and will affect the profit<br />
of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Controll<strong>in</strong>g all the departments <strong>in</strong> tune with the strategic plan of<br />
the ref<strong>in</strong>ery need good quality <strong>in</strong>formation flowsystem.<br />
155
5.3.3 Account<strong>in</strong>g Information System (AIS) for the <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
Important decisions <strong>in</strong> the AIS are (1) How to organize the account<strong>in</strong>g<br />
records <strong>in</strong> an organization to retrieve the data at appropriate place (2) How to<br />
design set proceed<strong>in</strong>gs to meet management and Government requirements (3)<br />
Value change management, gives stages of value addition tak<strong>in</strong>g place to the<br />
products while transform<strong>in</strong>g from the raw material to f<strong>in</strong>ished product. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out correct answer to these questions is the prime objective of AlS. Divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> to<br />
subsystems is essential for gett<strong>in</strong>g better solution to the problem.<br />
5.3.3.1 Basic subsystems<br />
• Expenditure cycle: <strong>in</strong>volves activities of buy<strong>in</strong>g and pay<strong>in</strong>g for goods or<br />
services, payment by organization<br />
• Production cycle: <strong>in</strong>volves activities of convert<strong>in</strong>g raw material and<br />
labour <strong>in</strong> to f<strong>in</strong>ished goods.<br />
• Human resource or payroll cycle: <strong>in</strong>clude activities of hir<strong>in</strong>g and pay<strong>in</strong>g<br />
employees.<br />
• Revenue cycle: <strong>in</strong>volves activities of sell<strong>in</strong>g goods or services and<br />
collect<strong>in</strong>g payment.<br />
• F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g cycle: <strong>in</strong>volves activities for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g necessary funds for<br />
runn<strong>in</strong>g the organization; repay creditors and distribute profit to<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestors.<br />
Figure 5.9 Ledger report<strong>in</strong>g system<br />
Expenditure cycle<br />
General ledger and report<strong>in</strong>g system<br />
<strong>Management</strong> of cash flow is very critical <strong>in</strong> profit mak<strong>in</strong>g because the<br />
amount <strong>in</strong>volved is very high. Logistics normally does not <strong>in</strong>clude the fund<br />
156
management <strong>in</strong> its prime activity. In supply cha<strong>in</strong> management cash flow is also<br />
given equal importance for performance improvement. To improve the speed of<br />
movement of material, the payment of cash also must efficient. In <strong>Indian</strong> contest<br />
payment system has a lot of weaknesses. Even the bank<strong>in</strong>g system is not<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational standard, especiallycheck deal<strong>in</strong>gs. So special case<br />
and attention is needed <strong>in</strong> the area of cash flow. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess objectives of good cash<br />
flow system are<br />
• Efficient account<strong>in</strong>g system to support bus<strong>in</strong>ess processes<br />
• Provide <strong>in</strong>put for effective control of cost.<br />
• Effective use of funds available.<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> functional requirement of a good <strong>in</strong>formation flow system IS<br />
discussed<strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />
5.3.3.1 General ledger account<strong>in</strong>g<br />
It must provide a comprehensive picture of external account<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
accounts. It must automatically post all sub-ledger items <strong>in</strong> the appropriate<br />
general ledger accounts (reconciliation accounts) It must facilitate<br />
simultaneously updat<strong>in</strong>g of general ledger and cost account<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
(figure 5.9). It must also support real - time evaluation of reports on current<br />
account<strong>in</strong>g data, <strong>in</strong> the form of account displays f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements with<br />
different balance sheet versions and additional analysis. The cash flow system<br />
must support <strong>in</strong>tegration with different taxes. Major stakes are sales taxes, excise<br />
duty, provident fund of employees, customs charges for import of crude oil and<br />
port charges for us<strong>in</strong>g the facilities at port.<br />
5.3.3.2 Accounts payable<br />
Accounts payable must record and adm<strong>in</strong>ister account<strong>in</strong>g data from<br />
supplier. It must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated with purchas<strong>in</strong>g. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g not only <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
crude oil and shipp<strong>in</strong>g but also chemical, spare parts ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and other<br />
utilities. All the deliveries and <strong>in</strong>voices must recorded based on each supplier.<br />
These data must give <strong>in</strong>put for cash management and must support various k<strong>in</strong>d<br />
157
of other payments like freight. Present procedure for data entries and check<strong>in</strong>g<br />
aregiven <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.10.<br />
Data are drawn from three different departments for match<strong>in</strong>g. Goods<br />
receipt data is taken from the stores warehouse department, purchase order data<br />
is taken from materials department and <strong>in</strong>voice data is taken from accounts<br />
department. Based on the quantity accepted from warehouse and other factors<br />
from purchase order data the cash to be paid is worked out. This amount is<br />
matched with the bill amount <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>voice. Three-way bill match<strong>in</strong>g not required <strong>in</strong><br />
an efficient cash flow system. Two ways - bill match<strong>in</strong>g is enough for a<br />
computerized system. Efficiency of the system will improve by two way bill<br />
match<strong>in</strong>g. Figure 5.10 shows it.<br />
From m . department<br />
Purchase order<br />
data<br />
Check<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Figure. 5.10 Three way bill match<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />
From stores department<br />
Mat h<strong>in</strong>g<br />
From accounts<br />
Invoice data<br />
Two way bill match<strong>in</strong>g works on the basic assumption of hav<strong>in</strong>g high level<br />
ofaccuracy <strong>in</strong> warehouse data and purchase order data (figure 5.U). It avoids the<br />
non-value add<strong>in</strong>g activity of <strong>in</strong>voice registration. The bills can be passed on the<br />
basis of <strong>in</strong>puts from purchase order and goods receipt<br />
5.3.3.3 Accounts receivable<br />
Accounts receivable must record and adm<strong>in</strong>ister account<strong>in</strong>g data of all<br />
customers. It must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated with sales. All <strong>in</strong> account receivables must be<br />
recorded directly <strong>in</strong> the general ledger (GL). It must provide <strong>in</strong>put directly for<br />
158
credit management. It must support alarm reports on defaulters of payment and<br />
due date list etc.<br />
5.3.3.4 Cost<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Overhead cost controll<strong>in</strong>g enables to plan, control allocates, and monitor<br />
overhead costs. Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the overhead supports specify standards, which<br />
enables to control costs and evaluate <strong>in</strong>ternal activities. All overhead costs must<br />
be assigned to the cost centers where they are <strong>in</strong>curred. At the end of a post<strong>in</strong>g<br />
period, when all allocations have been made, the plan costs must be compared<br />
with the correspond<strong>in</strong>g actual costs on the basis of the operat<strong>in</strong>g rate. Analysis of<br />
the result<strong>in</strong>g target/actual variance can be used for further managerial<br />
account<strong>in</strong>g measures with<strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Figure 5.11 Two-way bill match<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Mismatch<br />
Match<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Cost center account<strong>in</strong>g must be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e where costs <strong>in</strong>cur <strong>in</strong> the<br />
organization. To achieve this, costs must be assigned to such organizational areas<br />
where the costs <strong>in</strong>cur. The record<strong>in</strong>g and assignment of costs not only enables to<br />
carry out cost controll<strong>in</strong>g but also provides vital preparation for the subsequent<br />
areas of cost account<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
5.3.3.5 Treasury<br />
Treasury must support cash management, cash budget management and<br />
treasury management. Cash management must support:<br />
• Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g optimumamount ofliquidityto meet required payments asthey<br />
become due.<br />
159
• Monitor<strong>in</strong>g cash <strong>in</strong>flows and outflows<br />
It must support various types of <strong>in</strong>puts and cheques. This also must<br />
facilitate <strong>in</strong>formation on status of the cash and liquidity forecast. Cash<br />
management must take care of short term cash management where medium and<br />
longterm liquidity management must be supported by cash budget management.<br />
Treasury management must support<br />
• <strong>Management</strong> off<strong>in</strong>ancial transactions and positions.<br />
• Toprovide flexibility <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g off<strong>in</strong>ancial transactions & positions.<br />
All the transactions must be closely monitored for the efficient<br />
performance of a supply cha<strong>in</strong> management.<br />
5.4 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Efficiency Improvement Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Information Technology<br />
Information technology adds quality and speed to the decision mak<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
it is true <strong>in</strong> the case of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management also.<br />
5.4.1 Introduction<br />
Logistics and supply cha<strong>in</strong> management (SCM) has been <strong>in</strong>fluenced by<br />
developments <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation technology (IT) and computer systems. The<br />
allocation decision of products to various outlets can be carried out centrally.<br />
Capture of relevant data, their transmission to the central decision-maker and the<br />
ability to manipulate them and communicate the decisions to all different<br />
departments, <strong>in</strong> time for the decision to be effective, is now possible. It is now<br />
realistically possible to plan with shorter plann<strong>in</strong>g horizons. Ref<strong>in</strong>eries can plan<br />
their operation on daily basis us<strong>in</strong>g it (figure 5.12). The two major reasons for the<br />
use of IT <strong>in</strong> SCM are the spatial spread of production and service activities and<br />
the time element <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g, both of which require data <strong>in</strong>tensive decision<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g. To make such decision mak<strong>in</strong>g possible, there has to be efficient, reliable<br />
and timely data capture, data availability at various locations, and the ease with<br />
which it can be manipulated for the purpose decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
160
5.4.2 Segmentation of Information Technology<br />
Information technology can be segmented <strong>in</strong> three dimensions. They are<br />
scope of application, functionality and stage of technological development. Each<br />
ofthese would further have the hardware and software aspects of technology.<br />
5.4.2.1 Scope of Application<br />
Based on the managerial scope of application, IT applications can be<br />
classified as Transaction Process<strong>in</strong>g System (TPS), <strong>Management</strong> Information<br />
System (MIS), and Decision Support System (DSS)<br />
• A TPS deals with <strong>in</strong>dividual transaction and <strong>in</strong>teractions between different<br />
entities <strong>in</strong> a managerial system and is governed by simple logical rules of<br />
operations. The ma<strong>in</strong> role of a TPS is to ensure reliable <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
exchange and reduce the time of response, as compared to a manual<br />
system for the same purpose. For example the products moved from<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery by pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship, rail or road on a particular day could be traced<br />
easily <strong>in</strong> a computerized system whereas <strong>in</strong> manual system records must<br />
be exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Data must be generated at the po<strong>in</strong>t of delivery for better<br />
and faster <strong>in</strong>formation at any time.<br />
• A MIS goes one level further and provides <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> various ways to<br />
managers at different levels. For example demand for each product <strong>in</strong> a<br />
particular month or area wise sales Figures of products like diesel, petrol,<br />
lubricat<strong>in</strong>g oil etc.<br />
• A DSS has the provision for decision models <strong>in</strong> the relevant doma<strong>in</strong>s. A<br />
DSS will help to take decisions after consider<strong>in</strong>g the constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Options<br />
will be given by the system. For example number of ships for br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />
crude oil to a port for a month can be decided with the help of a DSS. This<br />
problem has already been discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4.<br />
162
5.4.2.2 Functionality<br />
functionality<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g major categories can be identified from the po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />
Data Capture, Display, and Organization. This is the basic function<br />
of collection and monitor<strong>in</strong>g the data and <strong>in</strong>formation to do with logistics and<br />
SCM. Data Collection <strong>in</strong>cludes record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventory, production, resource<br />
availability (eg. Tank availability), etc. us<strong>in</strong>g a variety manual and automated<br />
technologies. Data display is ideally <strong>in</strong> graphical form or formats that are close to<br />
what managers f<strong>in</strong>d convenient, such asTables. Data organization is achieved<br />
through a database management system and is briefly discussed <strong>in</strong> section 5.5.4.<br />
In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery all the open<strong>in</strong>g are done at different levels. Figure 5.11 desires<br />
the capture and transform and utilization of data. The most import and data<br />
generation po<strong>in</strong>ts are process department, stock and oil, Delivery po<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />
accounts sections. These generated data are used is by many other departments<br />
as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.11.<br />
Communication. An essential feature of SCM is that data is made<br />
available across spatially dispersed decision- mak<strong>in</strong>g units. Communication of<br />
data across distances is now possible through a variety of technologies.<br />
163
Competitive advantage <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> management is ga<strong>in</strong>ed not simply<br />
through faster and cheaper communication of data. Ready access to transactional<br />
data does not automatically lead to better decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
To effectively apply IT to manage its supply cha<strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery must<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guish between the form and function of transactional IT and Analytical IT.<br />
Transactional IT is concerned with acquir<strong>in</strong>g, process<strong>in</strong>g and communicat<strong>in</strong>g raw<br />
data about the company's past and current supply cha<strong>in</strong> operations, and with the<br />
compilation and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of reports summariz<strong>in</strong>g these data, typical<br />
examples are general ledger systems, quarterly sales reports, and Enterprise<br />
Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g (ERP) systems.<br />
Process<strong>in</strong>g. Analytical IT evaluates supply cha<strong>in</strong> decisions based on<br />
models developed from supply cha<strong>in</strong> decision databases, which are largely, but<br />
wholly derived from the company's transactional database, plus model<strong>in</strong>g<br />
systems and communication networks l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g corporate databases to the decision<br />
databases. It is concerned with analyz<strong>in</strong>g decisions short, medium, and long<br />
term. Typical example is model<strong>in</strong>g for selection of crude oil form the world<br />
market or beat<strong>in</strong>g a new distribution center.<br />
5.4.3 E-supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
The need for speed IT professionals place a high premium on speed when<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g the value of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> solutions. How important is<br />
quicker access to supplies and buyers as a feature of web-based <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong>. 31% claims speed is extremely important. 26% says moderately<br />
important. 24% comments that speed is neither important nor not important.<br />
11% of professionals feel speed is slightly important and 8% feels it is not at all<br />
important. To have the desired speed of <strong>in</strong>formation E-supply cha<strong>in</strong> will help.<br />
Provid<strong>in</strong>g the right amount of relevant <strong>in</strong>formation to those who need to know it,<br />
when they need to know it is, <strong>in</strong> fact, effective SCM from <strong>in</strong>formation po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />
view. The e-supply cha<strong>in</strong> will have customers and suppliers seamlessly l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
together, throughout the world, exchang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation almost <strong>in</strong>stantly. The<br />
velocity of relevant <strong>in</strong>formation flow will be so fast that respond<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
165
<strong>in</strong>evitable changes <strong>in</strong> expected vs. actual customer demand-driven (pull type)<br />
production and support<strong>in</strong>g processes that provide for faster changes <strong>in</strong> the actual<br />
material flowto match demand.<br />
Fast access to relevant supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation can payoffhandsomely <strong>in</strong><br />
lower<strong>in</strong>g costs, less <strong>in</strong>ventory, higher quality decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g and better<br />
customer services. One of the biggest cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs is <strong>in</strong> the overhead activity<br />
associated with lots of paperwork and its <strong>in</strong>herent redundancies. The non-value<br />
added time of manual transaction process<strong>in</strong>g could <strong>in</strong>stead be focused on higher<br />
revenue creation activities without proportional <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> expenses. The result<br />
<strong>in</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>ventories, better decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g quality, reduced overhead costs,<br />
among other benefits makes e-supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong> a highly desirable<br />
strategy.<br />
5.4.3.1 Develop<strong>in</strong>g an e-supply strategy<br />
E-supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong> significantly changes the way <strong>in</strong> which<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess does bus<strong>in</strong>ess. As a result, management needs to change and serve<br />
markets. Methods used so far are not sufficient, especially companies seek<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease market share. As more and more companies evolve new supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
models, management is compelled to take the right actions or risk be<strong>in</strong>g left<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d.<br />
Just apply<strong>in</strong>g more software at the problem is not the right answer to the<br />
core issues of SCM. Although software is needed, it is very necessary to def<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
process of <strong>in</strong>formation flow that will activate material flow at the right time.<br />
Lessons learned by early adopters of new technologies is that overzealous<br />
adoption of those technologies without a carefully planned strategy can prove<br />
verycostly, especially when the strategy is missed or not def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the first place.<br />
5.4.4 Technology Development Stages<br />
IT developments <strong>in</strong> companies have evolved overtime through the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g stages. These reflect an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trend towards meet<strong>in</strong>g the goal of<br />
166
supply cha<strong>in</strong> management, despite several practical difficulties <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g<br />
thechanges smoothly.<br />
• Sub optimization: This is optimiz<strong>in</strong>g the operations of each department.<br />
Typical example is select<strong>in</strong>g the purchase of crude consider<strong>in</strong>g all constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a mathematical model. Selection will be the best but it will not be<br />
consider<strong>in</strong>g the market demand predictions. So the selected crude oil need<br />
not give products, which are high <strong>in</strong> demand. This is commonly used <strong>in</strong><br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />
• Organization level and <strong>in</strong>ter organization-<strong>in</strong>tegrated systems.<br />
This is the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> organization level. The systems developed are<br />
Electronic data Interchange (EDI) manufactur<strong>in</strong>g recourse Plann<strong>in</strong>g (MRP),<br />
distribution Recourse Plann<strong>in</strong>g (DRP)and ERP<br />
• Integrated Systems.<br />
Total <strong>in</strong>tegration of the organization is the feature. Customer to supplier is<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated through network<strong>in</strong>g. Computational speed will be match<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
operational decision - Mak<strong>in</strong>g requirements.<br />
5.4.5 Hardware Network<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The Hardware aspect of IT systems are described below. The mam<br />
hardware systems which supports IT are Internet, Extranet, Intranet, and VSAT<br />
Intranet: This is used to communicate with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. Access to data<br />
collected is not open to all with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry also. It can be made available through<br />
network<strong>in</strong>g of computers <strong>in</strong> each department. Authenticity of data is very high<br />
and shar<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>formation is good, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g becomes very fast. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />
Advantage of <strong>in</strong>tranet is less documentation and its storage. Paperless offices can<br />
be made us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tranet. Privacyof data is very well ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
• Extranet: Connection between different offices <strong>in</strong> different locations can be<br />
atta<strong>in</strong>ed through extranet. Privacy of data is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. Access is limited to<br />
permitted users.<br />
167
monitored.<br />
Depots can be connected usmg and the product movement will be<br />
• Internet: Information can be passed to anybody at any place <strong>in</strong> the world. Ma<strong>in</strong><br />
disadvantage is privacy. Privacy is very limited <strong>in</strong> Internet but the reach is very<br />
good. Information, which does not require mush privacy can be, used the mode of<br />
communication. Sales Figures or balance sheet of the company can be<br />
communicated through Internet.<br />
• VSAT: This is onl<strong>in</strong>e communication. All the data generated will be<br />
communicated to the host system. Sell<strong>in</strong>g fuel at an outlet can be communicated<br />
to the ref<strong>in</strong>ery at the time of dispens<strong>in</strong>g itself. It captures data at the source and<br />
transmitted through a satellite transmitter. The receiver at ref<strong>in</strong>ery will receive<br />
the communication <strong>in</strong>stantaneously. At any po<strong>in</strong>t of time the total sale of any<br />
product like petrol can be seen directly. Production plann<strong>in</strong>g and products<br />
movement can be controlled <strong>in</strong> a better way.<br />
5.4.6 Integrated systems.<br />
The full force of supply cha<strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g enabled by developments <strong>in</strong> IT<br />
emerges <strong>in</strong> the area of <strong>in</strong>tegrated systems. These are hardware and software<br />
elements. They permit analysis and decision- mak<strong>in</strong>g across functions and<br />
narrowly def<strong>in</strong>ed entities. Some of the important developments <strong>in</strong> these are<br />
discussedbelow.<br />
5.4.6.1 Geographical <strong>in</strong>formation Systems (GIS)<br />
A technology that is suitable for use for management of logistics and SCM<br />
<strong>in</strong> spatially widespread operations is GIS. The technology captures the spatial<br />
characteristics of data and is typically map based. Data can be conveniently<br />
represented as attributes with po<strong>in</strong>ters to specific geographical areas through an<br />
appropriate database. Both location wise and area wise representation of data is<br />
possible. For logistics & SCM applications, the spatial <strong>in</strong>formation ofthe database<br />
is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by digitiz<strong>in</strong>g maps. This visual <strong>in</strong>terface provided by such software is<br />
very powerful and allows a good level of <strong>in</strong>terface decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g by the user<br />
directly. It also permits the use of decision models built upon the basic GIS. This<br />
168
enables decisions like market segmentation, location decisions, allocation<br />
decisions and rout<strong>in</strong>g decisions.<br />
5.4.6.2 Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)<br />
The spatial aspect of manag<strong>in</strong>g distribution and procurement systems can<br />
now be managed us<strong>in</strong>g EDI. This is a system highly structured message<br />
communication with tight pre decided formats of documents, which allows<br />
computers <strong>in</strong> different locations to communicate effectively with speed and<br />
reliability. There is a service provider through whom this transfer of data takes<br />
place, who provides translators between different formats and handles the EDI<br />
traffic between various sources and dest<strong>in</strong>ations. The uses of EDI requires<br />
adherence to certa<strong>in</strong> standards. In addition to the hardware and software that a<br />
firm may have, EDI requires specific software that allows conversion from any<br />
application to an application free format.<br />
5.4.6.3 MRP -11 and DPR<br />
High level of plann<strong>in</strong>g which <strong>in</strong>cludes capacity plann<strong>in</strong>g, some feedback <strong>in</strong><br />
the plann<strong>in</strong>g based on <strong>in</strong>dividual process constra<strong>in</strong>ts and provid<strong>in</strong>g provision for<br />
some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, both <strong>in</strong>ternal and external is made possible under the<br />
framework of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g resources plann<strong>in</strong>g (MRP-II)<br />
On similar l<strong>in</strong>es, Distribution Resources Plann<strong>in</strong>g(DRP) software attempts<br />
to synchronize the dispatch of multiple products to multiple locations based on<br />
orders placed.<br />
5.4.6.4 Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g (ERP)<br />
ERP systems are operational IT systems that gather <strong>in</strong>formation from<br />
across all of a company's functions, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the entire enterprise hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
broader scope. ERP systems monitor material, order schedules, f<strong>in</strong>ished products<br />
and other <strong>in</strong>formation through out the organization, ERP systems help to make<br />
better supply cha<strong>in</strong> decisions.<br />
169
ERP systems are good at monitor<strong>in</strong>g transactions out generally lack the<br />
analyticalcapability to determ<strong>in</strong>e what transactions ought to happen. They reside<br />
more <strong>in</strong> the operational area <strong>in</strong> the IT map than <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g or strategic<br />
areas. ERP system track orders through the entire company from procurement to<br />
delivery. Today's trend of us<strong>in</strong>g a product based <strong>in</strong>stead of a function - based<br />
organizational structure has also helped make ERP systems more alternative<br />
because this structure <strong>in</strong>creases the importance of the cross- functional scope<br />
that ERP systems provide.<br />
ERP systems not only allow a company to track items through out the<br />
system, they also allow a company to automate processes. By automat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
processes, companies are often able to <strong>in</strong>crease efficiency and reduce errors. It is<br />
also important that automat<strong>in</strong>g poor processes only guarantee that they will be<br />
executed poorly each time. So companies would review their processes before<br />
implement<strong>in</strong>g ERP systems.<br />
5.4.6.5 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> (SCM)<br />
SCM systems are a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of many of the preced<strong>in</strong>g applications and<br />
are used to span the stages <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. SCM systems allow for a more<br />
global scope because they can span many supply cha<strong>in</strong> stages with their different<br />
modules. SCM systems have the analytical capabilities to produce plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
solutions and strategic level decisions. They do not usually span all of the supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> stages, they rely on ERP systems to provide the <strong>in</strong>formation necessary to<br />
perform the analysis. SCM systems currently provide the highest level of<br />
functionality with respect to the vertical axis of the IT map.<br />
Two features of SCM products are noteworthy. First the back end <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
a number of analytical techniques based on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of optimization. The<br />
front end of SCM products provide more <strong>in</strong>terfaces for model formulation and<br />
validationby users.<br />
170
5.4.7 SCM Software<br />
SCMsoftware is described as "Effectivesupply cha<strong>in</strong> management enables<br />
you to make <strong>in</strong>formed decisions along the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong> from acquir<strong>in</strong>g raw<br />
materials to manufactur<strong>in</strong>g products to distribut<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ished goods to the<br />
customer". ERP systems provide a great deal of plann<strong>in</strong>g capabilities the various<br />
materials, capacity and demand constra<strong>in</strong>ts are all considered separately <strong>in</strong><br />
relative isolation of each other. The more lead<strong>in</strong>g edge SCM products are able to<br />
consider all the relevant <strong>in</strong>formation simultaneously and to perform real time<br />
simulations of adjustments with<strong>in</strong> the constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Real time <strong>in</strong>formation through<br />
out the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong> is needed to make correct decisions and SCM<br />
products are designed to gather that real time <strong>in</strong>formation. Traditional ERP<br />
systems generally do not gather real time <strong>in</strong>formation from everywhere <strong>in</strong> the<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> on the contrary they often conta<strong>in</strong> static, dated <strong>in</strong>formation only<br />
related to subsections of the supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Most SCM products are be<strong>in</strong>g designed with the Internet <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g web front ends for suppliers and customers, and transactions be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sent over the Internet <strong>in</strong>stead of via the more expensive and complicated EDI.<br />
This section will exam<strong>in</strong>e two of the lead<strong>in</strong>g SCM software vendors and four of<br />
the lead<strong>in</strong>g ERP vendors and their SCM products.<br />
• Manugistics<br />
They developed the very first SCM software <strong>in</strong> 1980. They have steadily<br />
been add<strong>in</strong>g new functionality to their SCM products and now have one of the<br />
fullest product l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the SCM market. Manugistics offers products <strong>in</strong> Demand<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Supply</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g schedul<strong>in</strong>g, Transportation<br />
management, supply cha<strong>in</strong> navigator, NETWORKS.<br />
The first four are SCM products, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Navigator is a graphical<br />
SCM model<strong>in</strong>g tool that allows the user to simulate supply cha<strong>in</strong> changes,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cost analysis and to view the current status of all elements <strong>in</strong> the supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong>. Networks are an Internet based supply cha<strong>in</strong> collaboration frameworks.<br />
171
- i2<br />
ia is formed to implement software from mathematical methods of supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> optimisation. iz has a product l<strong>in</strong>e similar to management. It <strong>in</strong>cludes:<br />
Demand plann<strong>in</strong>g, Distribution plann<strong>in</strong>g, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Transportation plann<strong>in</strong>g, Advanced schedul<strong>in</strong>g, Order promis<strong>in</strong>g and data<br />
Integration<br />
-Baan<br />
Company started <strong>in</strong> 1978 <strong>in</strong> Netherland. The first version of Bann's next<br />
genaration. MRP software was released <strong>in</strong> 1987.In 1998, Baan created a separate<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess named baan supply cha<strong>in</strong> solution (Baan SCS) to develop, implement<br />
and support their new suite of supply cha<strong>in</strong> products. Their SCM products are<br />
tightly <strong>in</strong>tegrated with Baan ERP. Products <strong>in</strong>clude Baan SCS planner, Baan SCS<br />
Demand planner, Baan SCS Scheduler, Baan SCS execution.<br />
-SAP<br />
SAP was founded <strong>in</strong> Germany <strong>in</strong> 1972 by four former IBM employees.<br />
Unlike many of its competitors, SAP has adopted a build your own philosophy<br />
when add<strong>in</strong>g functionality to its ERP product suite. This is true for its ERP<br />
product suite. This is true for its SCM products also. Product l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>clude supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> cockpit, Available to promise (ATP), Advanced plann<strong>in</strong>g & schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
CAPS) and forecast<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
- People Soft<br />
People soft was founded <strong>in</strong> 1987, released their first Human Resource<br />
<strong>Management</strong> System (HRMS) software package <strong>in</strong> 1988. They started offer<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g module <strong>in</strong> 1996. The SCM product l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>cludes Enterprise<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g, product plann<strong>in</strong>g and order promis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
172
• Oracle<br />
Oracle corporation was formed <strong>in</strong> 1977. The SCM product l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
Materials management, Sales order management, Post sales customer service<br />
and Qualitymanagement.<br />
The most important new feature of the new wave of SCM products must be<br />
the ability to give the end customer a " time to deliver" <strong>in</strong> real time. This is only<br />
possible to do accurately with a comprehensive SCM solutions be<strong>in</strong>g used<br />
through out an organization and its suppliers and customers. This ability will be<br />
the result of all the separate pieces of <strong>in</strong>formation be<strong>in</strong>g available, such as current<br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g capacity, parts availability, <strong>in</strong>ventory levels at all locations,<br />
distribution capabilities and current and forecast product demand. This ability<br />
has been described by many experienced manufactur<strong>in</strong>g manager as truly<br />
revolutionary, process<strong>in</strong>g a strong SCM system is quickly becom<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
requirement for competitive success <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />
5.5 Application of SCM Software <strong>in</strong> a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Real time <strong>in</strong>formation throughout the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong> is need to make<br />
correct decisions and SCM products must be designed to gather that real time<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation. The procedure required by a ref<strong>in</strong>ery to develop an efficient SCM<br />
system is discussed <strong>in</strong> this section.<br />
5.5.1 Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g design of logistic <strong>in</strong>formation system<br />
Logistic <strong>in</strong>formation system be<strong>in</strong>g very complex the design must<br />
consider a lot of parameters. Organization culture also <strong>in</strong>fluences the system<br />
because the changes must be acceptable to the organization.<br />
173
Organization<br />
culture<br />
Physical facilities &<br />
operations<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
environment<br />
III<br />
III<br />
Logistic<br />
<strong>in</strong>formati<br />
on<br />
system<br />
Information technology<br />
Figure 5.14 Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g design of logistics <strong>in</strong>formation system<br />
/<br />
Strategy<br />
Organizational<br />
process plan<br />
Organizational<br />
process<br />
Figure 5.14 represent diagrammatically the relationship with each other<br />
factorwith the <strong>in</strong>formation system.<br />
5.5.2 Proposed Design of SCM <strong>in</strong>formation System for a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Total <strong>in</strong>formation flow can be divided <strong>in</strong> small modules for detailed<br />
analysis. Then these modules can be <strong>in</strong>tegrated to get the fully <strong>in</strong>tegrated model<br />
of<strong>in</strong>formation system.<br />
5.5.2.1 Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g module<br />
Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g module gives <strong>in</strong>formation on ma<strong>in</strong>tenance schedule,<br />
quantity of crude oil which is selected for purchase, and the expected net back<br />
from the process<strong>in</strong>g of total crude oil. Crude price used for calculation is the<br />
landed price at ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Constra<strong>in</strong>ts like availabilty, distance,et. are used for the<br />
selectionof crude oil.<br />
174
Quantity and type of crude to be processed next is the output of the<br />
module. The operations to be performed for gett<strong>in</strong>g the desired results also can<br />
beachievedfrom the module.<br />
5.5.2.6 F<strong>in</strong>ished products tank yard plan and operation module<br />
Product distribution is controlled by the decisions from this module. Type<br />
of transport, quantity, quality, etc. are decided <strong>in</strong> this module. Transaction<br />
Process<strong>in</strong>g System (TPS) will compute the details of transaction.<br />
Information flow must start from the retail outlet. Present practice <strong>in</strong><br />
almost all ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India is on the basis of projected data by Govt. of India.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the production was not enough to meet the demand and competition was<br />
not there, ref<strong>in</strong>eries could manage very well. Due to decontrol of petroleum<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry anybody can import and sell <strong>in</strong> the market. So the <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
generation must be accurate as much as possible to m<strong>in</strong>imize the <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
hold<strong>in</strong>g and maximiz<strong>in</strong>g flexibility of products. Figure 5.12 shows the overhaul<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation flow <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
In the years to come, all the outlets will not be demand<strong>in</strong>g diesel with<br />
same centane number. Requirement for products will change from location to<br />
location. For example <strong>in</strong> Kerala demand for diesel with low flash po<strong>in</strong>t will be<br />
higher <strong>in</strong> the cities. This will reduce fire hazard at the event of accident. Demand<br />
for diesel with high flash po<strong>in</strong>t will be preferred <strong>in</strong> the high ranges of Kerala.<br />
Temperature on the hill top will be low so the start<strong>in</strong>g will be difficult for vehicles<br />
with diesel of low cetane number. This <strong>in</strong>dicates the necessity for an accurate<br />
projection of demand on the basis of the product demand <strong>in</strong> the outlets. Earlier<br />
this was almost impossible to get the real demand at retail outlet. Consumption<br />
at retail outlet can be now collected on daily basis or even hourly basis if a<br />
company desires so. Bill<strong>in</strong>g must be done us<strong>in</strong>g computers. So the sales data is<br />
generated <strong>in</strong> the computer. By an <strong>in</strong>ternet connection these data can be<br />
communicated to the company. All the outlets can communicate their sales<br />
through <strong>in</strong>ternet and the company will get exact demand for each product on<br />
desired time <strong>in</strong>terval. This generated data must be compared with the projected<br />
177
generation po<strong>in</strong>t is sales. Sold products are mov<strong>in</strong>g through pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship,<br />
railway wagons and trucks. Almost all ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India is hav<strong>in</strong>g automatic<br />
fill<strong>in</strong>g stations. From fill<strong>in</strong>g stations consolidated statements are be<strong>in</strong>g send to<br />
the accounts department either on soft copy or hardcopy. In both the cases some<br />
re-entry is required <strong>in</strong> the computer. This leads delay, errors and unnecessary<br />
labour. Quantity difference is a common compla<strong>in</strong>t and normally this difference<br />
will be adjusted <strong>in</strong> fuel and oil losses. In the case of railway wagon fill<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />
quantity is checked only us<strong>in</strong>g dipsticks. It cannot be cross-checked. By us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
flow-measur<strong>in</strong>g device <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> pipel<strong>in</strong>e the sum of all the measurements can<br />
be checked. In all the outlets there must be automatic flow measur<strong>in</strong>g devices and<br />
the read<strong>in</strong>gs must automatically go to the computer. These computers can be<br />
connected through network if fill<strong>in</strong>g stations are with<strong>in</strong> a reasonable distance.<br />
Internet can be utilized if the distance is more. This data must be used for all<br />
purposes of account<strong>in</strong>g and production. For example sales tax calculation can be<br />
done <strong>in</strong> the accounts department with this data. All departments can know what<br />
is the present product stock <strong>in</strong> the company. Normal practice is stock and oil<br />
department will prepare a report and submit to all concerned departments on the<br />
basisof measurement from each tank.<br />
Another important activity is the receipt of crude oil. This data is also<br />
generated by measur<strong>in</strong>g from the storage tank. This can be measured by<br />
automatic measur<strong>in</strong>g devices <strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e and delivery l<strong>in</strong>e. This fill<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e will<br />
give the quantity pumped from ship to ref<strong>in</strong>ery and delivery l<strong>in</strong>e will give the<br />
quantity of crude oil used for production. Difference between these two will be<br />
the actual storage. These type of actual data will help <strong>in</strong> real time optimization.<br />
Other data generation po<strong>in</strong>ts are also there <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. They are less <strong>in</strong> volume<br />
but critically may be the same for many of the data generated like ma<strong>in</strong>tenance.<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance department is generat<strong>in</strong>g the data related to ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of any<br />
equipment. This data can be used for plann<strong>in</strong>g the availability of each equipment.<br />
The availability is taken from the history of each equipment. Shut down<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance is another data useful for plann<strong>in</strong>g and schedul<strong>in</strong>g. This give details<br />
on equipment history, product produced by it, price of equipment, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
180
work carried out so far, and work orders. A number of equipment, which are<br />
down and its work order also will be <strong>in</strong>itiated by the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance department.<br />
Inventory of chemicals and catalysts is another important <strong>in</strong>formation, which is<br />
to be trucked well to m<strong>in</strong>imize <strong>in</strong>ventory. Production details must be made<br />
availableto the vendors through extranet. Extranet takes case of privacy of data.<br />
Thisdata can be utilized by the vendor to calculate consumption of chemicals and<br />
catalysts. Inventory position also must be made available on the net. So the<br />
vendor can plan his transportation of these items to the company as when<br />
required. This will reduce the <strong>in</strong>ventory hold<strong>in</strong>g. Responsibility of chemicals and<br />
catalysts <strong>in</strong>ventory can be transferred to the vendors. Paper work and monitory<br />
ofthese items can be m<strong>in</strong>imized.<br />
Spares requirement is also generated at the plann<strong>in</strong>g stage of<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. It must give <strong>in</strong>formation on spares <strong>in</strong>ventory, category wise<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory and short supply of critical spares. Plant monitor<strong>in</strong>g is also requir<strong>in</strong>g<br />
database to conduct <strong>in</strong>spection and classification of tanks. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery requires<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on air pollution, ambient air quality, Effluent water quality, power<br />
demand <strong>in</strong> each bus steam vent<strong>in</strong>g, condense dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, statutory compliance<br />
reports on safety, accident free man hours, health level of employees aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
standards and govt. policies and regulations.<br />
Table 5.1 Details of data generated ateach department along with theirma<strong>in</strong> process.<br />
Process Department Data Generation<br />
Primary Processes<br />
Budget Plann<strong>in</strong>g GEC<br />
Crude cost<br />
Products Price<br />
Crude Throughout (GEB TargetvsActual)<br />
Production Today/MTD (GEB Target vs<br />
Actual)<br />
Production Today/MTD/YfD<br />
Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
withGCC<br />
Crude slate<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
GEC<br />
GEC<br />
GCC directives<br />
Expected crude receiptas per GEB Plan<br />
Expected crude receipt as per crude slate<br />
plan<br />
Actual receiptdates and quantities<br />
181
Process Department Data Generation<br />
S&OM Ship wise Ocean loss<br />
Ship wise Ocean loss above norms<br />
Ship wise demurrage loss<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g OEC Production Today /MTD (SPM Target Vs<br />
Actual)<br />
Manage sales<br />
S&OM<br />
Manage<br />
Institutional<br />
S&OM<br />
Products movement today/ MTD (SPM Vs.<br />
Actual)<br />
Products movement - trucks and wagons<br />
Sales<br />
F&A (sales)<br />
Products movement - pipe l<strong>in</strong>e and tankers<br />
Market<strong>in</strong>g Discount to customers<br />
Manage Direct<br />
Sales<br />
S&OM<br />
F&A(sales)<br />
Outstand<strong>in</strong>g payments<br />
Products movement today/ MTD (SPM Vs.<br />
Actual)<br />
Operate Plant<br />
Manage<br />
production<br />
Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Unit wise daily Net Back<br />
LPG Production<br />
Production units charge<br />
VGO yield (Today / MTD) (Potential Vs.<br />
Actual)<br />
Cl.Oyield<br />
Benzene yield<br />
Toluene yield<br />
Naphtha consumption for DHDS<br />
Hydrogen Production for DHDS<br />
Fuel Consumption - DHDS<br />
HSD/ LSDStock - DHDS<br />
Manage Quality<br />
Lab<br />
Quality giveaway<br />
Offspecs product tanks daily as of<br />
Crude Inventory - No. of days and 7 days<br />
plan Horizon<br />
Pend<strong>in</strong>g payment for crude received<br />
Payment made and crude not received<br />
Manage Inventory<br />
and movement<br />
S&OM<br />
Crude Inventory - not with<strong>in</strong> norm<br />
Product Inventory<br />
Intermediate Inventory<br />
Demurrage Loss<br />
Inventory AgeAnalysis<br />
Days stock of product Inventory<br />
182
Process Department Data Generation<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> Plant<br />
Manage<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
Manage<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
Availability<br />
Unplanned shut Down loss <strong>in</strong> Rs.<br />
Shut down Monitor<strong>in</strong>g (by unit and no. of<br />
hours)<br />
Ag<strong>in</strong>g of down equipment<br />
Inventory of Chemicals and catalysts<br />
Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of spares <strong>in</strong>ventory aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
Manage materials Materials norms<br />
Category wise <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
Short supply ofcritical spares<br />
Monitor Plant<br />
Process<br />
Manage process Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Design/<br />
Inspection<br />
Fuel consumption<br />
Oil loss<br />
Daily net back<br />
Fteactortemperature<br />
Conversion Percentage<br />
Hvdrozen Mol Ratio<br />
VGOvield<br />
VFt Viscosity<br />
Preheat Efficiency<br />
Cool<strong>in</strong>g Tower Efficiency<br />
Cool<strong>in</strong>g Water Outlet Temperature<br />
Heater Efficiency Design Vs. Actual<br />
Vis- breaker conversion<br />
Catalyst Loss<br />
Bottom Sediments and water ( BS & W)<br />
Reactor Temperature/ Regenerator<br />
Temperature<br />
Manage<br />
Inspection<br />
Inspection<br />
Boiler certification<br />
Tank certification<br />
Power Consumption<br />
ManageEHS E&E<br />
Water consumption<br />
Steam consumption<br />
Air Pollution - Process Heaters and Boilers<br />
183
Process Department Data Generation<br />
Ambient Air Quality<br />
Effluent Water Quality at ETP and FE<br />
Power Demand <strong>in</strong> each BUS<br />
Steam vent<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Improve Plant<br />
ManageR&D R&D<br />
Manage Projects Projects<br />
Support Processes<br />
Condensate dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Safety<br />
Statutory Compliance Reports<br />
Accident Free Man hours<br />
Health Health Level of Employees aga<strong>in</strong>st Standards<br />
Progress %and pend<strong>in</strong>g Mile Stones<br />
Project variance<br />
Capital Expenditure (Planned/ Non- planned)<br />
Capital jobs - Monthly Status<br />
Revenue Projects - Status<br />
Exception on Projects<br />
Absenteeism %<br />
Human Human Over time Cost %<br />
Resources Resources Statutory Reports Compliance<br />
Over Time Cost<br />
Net Outstand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Interest Cost on work<strong>in</strong>g capital<br />
F&A/Cs F&A/Cs Profitability<br />
Cash Flow<br />
Revenue expenditure - Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Heads<br />
IT C&A System uptime<br />
Legal & Legal<br />
Compliance<br />
Govern<strong>in</strong>g Processes<br />
Govt. Policies and<br />
Regulation<br />
Corporate<br />
Monthly monitor<strong>in</strong>g of MOU<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Capacity Utilization<br />
MoU<br />
Vigilance<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
OEC<br />
Crude Throughout w.r.t SPM<br />
Distillate yield w.r.t SPM<br />
184
• Laboratory <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• Process <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• Production Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Ref<strong>in</strong>ery schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Material balance<br />
The objective of this layer of <strong>in</strong>formation management is to ascerta<strong>in</strong><br />
operation efficiency. The third layer consists of <strong>in</strong>formation on bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
management. Some of the functional activities for this layer are:<br />
• F<strong>in</strong>ance and accounts<br />
• Materials<br />
• Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
• Projects<br />
• Sales and distribution<br />
• Human resource management<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> objective of <strong>in</strong>formation management at this layer is profit<br />
management. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed functional activities of current layer are named as<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Management</strong> System. Figure 5.12 shows the schematic presentation<br />
system for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery like KRL. Some of the functional activities are <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g at<br />
more than one layer. For example materials management and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
activities are perform<strong>in</strong>g at both the operation management and bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
management level. Degree of <strong>in</strong>tegration of functions is the success of any<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation system software selected should support both horizontal and vertical<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrate.<br />
5.5.4 Features of a supply cha<strong>in</strong> software<br />
given below:<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> features required for supply cha<strong>in</strong> management software are as<br />
• Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Demand management<br />
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
186
Operat<strong>in</strong>gmonitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Constra<strong>in</strong>tplann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Enterprise<br />
Distribution plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
In plant<br />
Safety Stockbuffers<br />
Advanced materialmanagement<br />
Detailed schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
• Vendormanaged<strong>in</strong>ventory.<br />
• Transportation<br />
• Real time product consumption<br />
• Physical distribution <strong>in</strong>terface<br />
• Service requirements<br />
• Optimizers<br />
• Integration<br />
These are the ma<strong>in</strong> requirements of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management software.<br />
Integration is the key function <strong>in</strong> the system. There are many software systems<br />
that sub optimizes at different level but the <strong>in</strong>tegration part is weak.<br />
5.6 Conclusion<br />
In a supply cha<strong>in</strong> management system there are three key components.<br />
They are <strong>in</strong>formation flow, material flow, and cash flow. Success of SCM lies <strong>in</strong><br />
the systematic control of all these flows. Standard methods are there for<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g material flow. Better technologies are there for faster <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
shar<strong>in</strong>g and use. Effective bank<strong>in</strong>g systems are there for faster transactions. But<br />
better monitor<strong>in</strong>g and control is required to reap the benefits of seM systems.<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g and control functions performed by logistic managers rely on quickand<br />
accurate relevant data. Build<strong>in</strong>g an Information System for data capture, storage,<br />
and use is the pre requisite of a good modern <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> System<br />
187
The software system must have very good data collection facility from the<br />
source of data as much as possible. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t data entry is the next stage if<br />
direct collection is not possible. Software system model must support all the<br />
functions <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The ma<strong>in</strong> functions <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are process control and<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g, operations management, and bus<strong>in</strong>ess management.<br />
This chapter was devoted to discussion on an <strong>in</strong>tegrated (modular)<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation system model for manag<strong>in</strong>g supply cha<strong>in</strong> activities <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation system model presented focused on logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g and control.<br />
Such a model is necessary to <strong>in</strong>tegrate and implement the different plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
modelsrecommended <strong>in</strong> chapter four.<br />
188
CHAPTER VI<br />
Strategic and Operational SCM Problems<br />
and Some Solutions for a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
6.1 Introduction<br />
Tools such as simulation are used for improv<strong>in</strong>g performance of logistics<br />
systems <strong>in</strong> the previous chapters. Application of these tools <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery shows its<br />
appropriateness <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery logistics also. For the purpose of study of the logistic<br />
system an important part of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited CKRL) was<br />
selected. Total supply cha<strong>in</strong> was studied from two different perspectives namely<br />
strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g and operations. The discussion on strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g starts<br />
with history of KRL and its work<strong>in</strong>g environment. Strengths, weaknesses,<br />
opportunities and threads of KRL are analysed and difference <strong>in</strong> outlook needed<br />
for competitive advantage <strong>in</strong> post APM liberalized economy are suggested.<br />
Operations <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> are classified <strong>in</strong>to conventional <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and<br />
outbound logistics for the purpose of analysis. These are studied <strong>in</strong> detail to<br />
identify problems and some suggestions for improvement <strong>in</strong> system performance<br />
are also given at each stage.<br />
6.2 Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
<strong>Management</strong> of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> KRL<br />
The present time is characterized from the follow<strong>in</strong>g important changes <strong>in</strong><br />
the petroleum ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector <strong>in</strong> India. (a) After years of Government control,<br />
decontrol is nearly completely implemented. (b) The sector has been opened for<br />
private ventures Cc) Crude oil prices are firm now after low prices <strong>in</strong> 1998 (d)<br />
Environmental standards are becom<strong>in</strong>g stricter Ce) Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>s are on the<br />
decrease (f) Liberalized trade regimes allow both <strong>in</strong>creased import and export of<br />
petroleum products. (g) New acquisitions, takeovers, and dis<strong>in</strong>vestments are<br />
tak<strong>in</strong>gplace <strong>in</strong> this important sector. The above changes create a need for ref<strong>in</strong>ers<br />
to reformulate their strategy more now than ever before. Plann<strong>in</strong>g at different<br />
189
levels is essential for the success of SCM application <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. A through<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g of exist<strong>in</strong>g systems is required for the successful plann<strong>in</strong>g. In the<br />
sections below a brief history of KRL, its current status, and the present logistics<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g practices are discussed. There after SWOT analyses is done and<br />
strategies for improvement are outl<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
6.2.1 Introduction to KRL<br />
Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited (KRL) was <strong>in</strong>corporated as a Public Limited<br />
Company <strong>in</strong> September 1963 with technical collaboration and f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
participation from Phillips <strong>Petroleum</strong> Company of USA. The Ref<strong>in</strong>ery was<br />
commissioned <strong>in</strong> 1966. Under APM <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g capacities and throughput was the<br />
best strategy. From the date of commission<strong>in</strong>g to-date, the Ref<strong>in</strong>ery undertook<br />
three expansions <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity and <strong>in</strong>stallation of Secondary Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Facilities. The capacity was first expanded from 2.5 million tons per annum<br />
(MMTPA) to 3.3 MMTPA <strong>in</strong> September 1976. The production of Liquefied<br />
<strong>Petroleum</strong> Gas (LPG) and Aviation Turb<strong>in</strong>e Fuel (ATF) commenced after this<br />
expansion. This was done as a strategy to diversify portfolio of products.<br />
Capacity was further <strong>in</strong>creased to 4.5 MMTPA <strong>in</strong> November 1984 along with the<br />
addition of 1 MMTPA capacity Fluid Catalytic Crack<strong>in</strong>g Unit. Crude process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
capacity was further expanded from 4.5 MMTPA to 7.5 MMTPA <strong>in</strong> December<br />
1994. Along with this expansion the capacity of the secondary process<strong>in</strong>g facilities<br />
was enhanced to 1.4MMTPA. This formed part of strategy to anticipate and meet<br />
strict fuel specifications to control pollution. A Fuel Gas De-sulphurisation Unit<br />
was also <strong>in</strong>stalled as part of the expansion project, as an environmental<br />
protection measure to m<strong>in</strong>imize sulfur dioxide emission from the Ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 1989, the Company commissioned Aromatics production<br />
facilities with a design capacity of 87,200 tons per annum (TPA) of Benzene and<br />
12,000 TPA of Toluene, mark<strong>in</strong>g KRL's entry <strong>in</strong>to petrochemicals. This was the<br />
time when petrochemical Industry <strong>in</strong> the country was expand<strong>in</strong>g and KRL<br />
strategy to enter this field was a part of forward <strong>in</strong>tegration A Captive Power<br />
Plant of 26.3 MW was commissioned <strong>in</strong> March 1991 to meet the power<br />
requirements of KRL and to safeguard the operations aga<strong>in</strong>st power supply<br />
fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the State grid. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 1998, an additional Captive Power<br />
190
Plant of 17.8 MW capacity was commissioned mak<strong>in</strong>g KRL self-sufficient <strong>in</strong><br />
power. The above strategies to become self sufficient <strong>in</strong> power requirement at the<br />
right time and was a very good strategy s<strong>in</strong>ce power shortage became regular <strong>in</strong><br />
Kerala soon after this. A Light Ends Feed Preparation Unit (LEFPU) to supply<br />
Polybutenes feedstock to Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Balmer Lawrie Ltd. (CRBL), a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
venture company, was commissioned <strong>in</strong> March 1996. KRL also commissioned a<br />
Raff<strong>in</strong>ate Purification Unit (RPU) for the manufacture of 10,000 TPA of<br />
<strong>Petroleum</strong> Hydrocarbon Solvent <strong>in</strong> January 1994, with the technology developed<br />
by the <strong>in</strong>-house R&D Center. KRL started commercial production of M<strong>in</strong>eral<br />
Turpent<strong>in</strong>e Oil (MTO) <strong>in</strong> March 1995, utiliz<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities of the<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery. KRL started production and market<strong>in</strong>g of Mixed Aromatic Solvent <strong>in</strong><br />
March 1996.<br />
KRL has demonstrated the capability to implement projects with<strong>in</strong><br />
approved cost and time. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade, KRL had undertaken<br />
implementation of the follow<strong>in</strong>g major projects:<br />
A. Aromatics Project (Aromatics)<br />
B. Captive Power Plant (CPP)<br />
C. Capacity Expansion Project (CEP)<br />
All the above Projects were completed with<strong>in</strong> approved cost and ahead of<br />
the targeted completion date. Details of which are given <strong>in</strong> Table 6.1<br />
Table 6.1 Project implementation <strong>in</strong> KRL<br />
Aromatics CPP CEP<br />
Approved Project Cost, Rs. Crores 75.80 67.89 481.24<br />
Actual Project Cost, Rs. Crores 70.71 64.63 472.98<br />
Scheduled Completion February 1989 April 1991 June 1995<br />
Actual Completion February 1989 March 1991 December 1994<br />
6.2.2 Currentscenario for KRL<br />
The deregulation programme of the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector commenced <strong>in</strong> April<br />
1998, and the most visible impact on operations of the ref<strong>in</strong>eries due to<br />
deregulation has been vastly improved bottom l<strong>in</strong>es. In the Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price<br />
191
Mechanism (APM) regime, the marg<strong>in</strong>s of the oil companies were artificially<br />
suppressed and the <strong>in</strong>troduction of Market Determ<strong>in</strong>ed Pric<strong>in</strong>g Mechanism<br />
(MDPM)witnessed quantum jump <strong>in</strong> the profitability of these companies.<br />
The projection of gross ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> dollars per barrel made by<br />
"Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia (CLSA)" <strong>in</strong> its report on "Oil & Gas Sector - India<br />
Research" dated July 1998 for <strong>Indian</strong> oil companies is given <strong>in</strong> Table 6.2.<br />
Table 6.2 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Company APM 1998·99 1999·00 2000-01 2001·02 2002·03<br />
MDPM MDPM MDPM MDPM MDPM<br />
10Cl 1.63 2.02 2.94 3.60 4.33 4.63<br />
HPCl 1.61 2.49 3.38 3.97 4.72 4.96<br />
BPCl 1.51 2.59 3.55 4.37 5.02 5.43<br />
KRl 1.66 2.53 3.49 4.27 4.96 5.35<br />
MRl 1.75 2.15 3.04 3.62 4.43 4.64<br />
While all the PSU ref<strong>in</strong>eries improve their marg<strong>in</strong>s substantially, BPCL<br />
and KRL show the biggest improvement due to their superior distillate yield. This<br />
projection has proved to be correct to a great extend by results from the <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Any depreciation <strong>in</strong> the value of the rupee will result <strong>in</strong> further improved marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />
due to import parity pric<strong>in</strong>g for products. The de-licens<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong><br />
ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g has resulted <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up of private sector ref<strong>in</strong>eries and jo<strong>in</strong>t venture<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries with PSU participation. Pure ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g companies such as KRL, MRL<br />
and BRPL will have to ensure firm tie-up for market<strong>in</strong>g of products to ensure<br />
100% capacity utilization dur<strong>in</strong>g this period. The petroleum products market <strong>in</strong><br />
the country promises to be more dynamic and turbulent <strong>in</strong> the short-to-medium<br />
term.<br />
192
6.2.3 SWOT analysis of KRL<br />
Table 6.5 SWOT analysis of KRL<br />
Strength Weakness<br />
Capacity Dependence on IOClfor crude<br />
Capacity utilization lackofexperience <strong>in</strong> sourc<strong>in</strong>g and procurement<br />
Crude use flexibility low priority to SCM<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong>ed and motivated work force low priority to logistics<br />
Captive power generation Limited crude oil unload<strong>in</strong>g facility<br />
High netbacks lackofown market<strong>in</strong>g facility<br />
Neamess of<strong>in</strong>dustrial customers Dependence on public sector oil market<strong>in</strong>g Cos.<br />
Project management Demurrages<br />
Opportunity Threat<br />
MDPM and opportunities to <strong>in</strong>crease profit New Start up ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
Freedom for alliances and tie ups Competition among public sectors<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial freedom Small size stand alone ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
Free to expand Stricter environmental rules<br />
Neamess to <strong>in</strong>temational sea trade l<strong>in</strong>e and port No common account for logistics costs<br />
Cost reduction exercises location away from major domestic consumer centers<br />
Stable cost for crude oil Over capacity <strong>in</strong> short and medium term<br />
Product export Scarcity ofwater <strong>in</strong> Kerala<br />
SWOT analysis of KRL is done <strong>in</strong> order to understand the present position<br />
ofKRL with respect to other ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the country.<br />
6.2.3.1 Strengths of KRL<br />
KRL is above national average <strong>in</strong> capacity utilisation. It is an advantage <strong>in</strong><br />
gett<strong>in</strong>g better netbacks and more profit. KRL is consistently utiliz<strong>in</strong>g its capacity<br />
above 100% for the last five years. So capacity expansion also will give better<br />
utilization of resources and can be justified. A variety of crude oil can be<br />
processed <strong>in</strong> crude KRL. Both low sulphur and high sulphur can be processed.<br />
This <strong>in</strong>creases the flexibility <strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g the crude oil. This can also lead to better<br />
price ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> purchase of crude oil. Work force is highly tra<strong>in</strong>ed and motivated.<br />
The compensation package is also very good when compared to other <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
<strong>in</strong> the state of Kerala. So the level of satisfaction is better. Concern for<br />
environment of KRL is also very good. They are promot<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />
preservation programmes. KRL has its own captive power generation unit. It<br />
elim<strong>in</strong>ates the over- dependence on state electricity board. Netback from ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> KRL is high when compared with similar ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India. Nearness to<br />
193
<strong>in</strong>dustrial customers like FACT is an advantage for KRL. Large volumes of<br />
products like naphtha will be consumed by the large <strong>in</strong>dustrial customers. It gives<br />
an assured market for value added products. Project management is strength for<br />
KRL. All the projects taken up were completed before schedule at less than the<br />
estimated cost. So any expansion project can be taken up by KRL for its own<br />
benefit.<br />
6.2.3.2 Weaknesses<br />
At present IOCL(IT) is mak<strong>in</strong>g purchase of crude oil for all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong><br />
India. So the freedom for selection of crude oil is limited. S<strong>in</strong>ce IOCLis do<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
purchases, ref<strong>in</strong>eries like KRL could not develop the expertise <strong>in</strong> sourc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
procurement of crude oil from the <strong>in</strong>ternational market. Priority for practices like<br />
SeM is less because <strong>in</strong>tegration is almost impossible. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil is<br />
done by one company and market<strong>in</strong>g is done by another company. Logistics<br />
performance improvement is not required because the cost of logistics is shared<br />
by other ref<strong>in</strong>eries also. So the improvements are not attempted. Crude oil<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g facilities is not sufficient to handle big ships at all times of the seasons.<br />
Thisis mak<strong>in</strong>g the unload<strong>in</strong>g as one of the major bottle necks for KRL. KRL does<br />
not do any direct market<strong>in</strong>g for the controlled products such as LPG, MS, HSD,<br />
SKO and ATF, which forms about 70 percent of the total products produced by<br />
weight. There are the four Public sector petroleum market<strong>in</strong>g companies that<br />
market controlled products of KRL. Different companies take different shares of<br />
the petroleum products produced. The graphs <strong>in</strong> Figure 6.2 show the product<br />
portfolioof each company.<br />
From figure 6.2 it can be seen that Motor Spirit (MS) forms nearly 12 to 18<br />
percent of the total products taken by the market<strong>in</strong>g companies. For BPC and<br />
IBP, MS forms a greater part of their total product marketed. HSD no doubt is<br />
the largest sold product for all companies. Its share varies from 62 to 82 percent.<br />
All the four companies take SKO, but its share for IOC and HPC is much higher.<br />
ATF is given to both IOCand BPC. LPGis not sold through IBP.<br />
194
ships is done by IOC and Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Corporation of India. KRL 's <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong><br />
this is very limited.<br />
6.2.3.3 Opportunity<br />
MDPM is an opportunity for KRL because they can make more profit due<br />
to better capacity utilization. Price be<strong>in</strong>g market driven, profit is always assured.<br />
Now ref<strong>in</strong>eries are free to have any sort of alliances. KRL can tie-up with<br />
companies, which are hav<strong>in</strong>g market<strong>in</strong>g strength. It will lead to easy capacity<br />
addition. Expansions, capacity addition, or develop<strong>in</strong>g market<strong>in</strong>g network can be<br />
made by rais<strong>in</strong>g money from any source. Government control is m<strong>in</strong>imum so the<br />
freedom for ref<strong>in</strong>eries is more. They can collect even through public issue of<br />
shares. Gett<strong>in</strong>g license for expansion or capacity addition is much simpler than<br />
the APM period. KRL can take their own decision <strong>in</strong> this regard. Now the cost<br />
reduction exercises will pay back. So implementation of methods like SCM are<br />
justified. Earlier many of the cost elements were shared by all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the<br />
country. In the post APM scenario each ref<strong>in</strong>ery can make sav<strong>in</strong>g by proper<br />
selectionof crude oil and ship for transport<strong>in</strong>g crude oil. Kochiis connected by all<br />
modes of transport to the other parts of the world. It is also near to the<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational sea trade l<strong>in</strong>e. So the cost of transport<strong>in</strong>g can be less and<br />
availability of ships willbe more. Crude oil price is almost stable for the last few<br />
years. It makes the crude oil purchase plann<strong>in</strong>g easier and better. Small variation<br />
can be adjusted <strong>in</strong> the sell<strong>in</strong>g price. It is possible <strong>in</strong> the MDPM. In a liberalized<br />
economy export is promoted. KRL also has chances to export to neibour<strong>in</strong>g<br />
countries where there are not much ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />
6.2.3.4 Threat<br />
Many new ref<strong>in</strong>eries are sett<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>in</strong> India. These ref<strong>in</strong>eries have high<br />
capacity and more flexibility. These qualities will enable them to process cheaper<br />
crude oil, which will lead to more profit. Due to open<strong>in</strong>g up of economy <strong>in</strong> India<br />
even public sector ref<strong>in</strong>eries are started to compete <strong>in</strong> the market<strong>in</strong>g. This will<br />
affect the market<strong>in</strong>g of stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Capacity of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery is not<br />
enough to develop a market<strong>in</strong>g network. It is also difficult to buy and transport<br />
large quantities of crude oil <strong>in</strong> order to ga<strong>in</strong> cost advantages. environmental<br />
196
egulations are gett<strong>in</strong>g stricter these days. So the product specifications will be<br />
rigid. Present setup of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery may not be enough to meet those<br />
specifications. By complete decontrol, the cost shar<strong>in</strong>g of logistics will disappear.<br />
KRL will be forced to meet all the logistic costs by themselves. Smaller parcel<br />
sizes of crude oil will be a disadvantage for KRL. Location of KRLis at south most<br />
end of India. Both crude oil and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products must be transported more.<br />
Capacity expansion may <strong>in</strong>crease the problem. KRL products are marketed only<br />
<strong>in</strong> India. Products demand for the near future is not expected to surpass the<br />
production. Capacity addition may <strong>in</strong>crease this problem also. KRL is depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on water from a river for all requirements. Ground water level <strong>in</strong> Kerala is<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>ggradually. Scarcity of water can be problem <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />
6.2.3.5 Recommendations of SWOT analysis<br />
The area of <strong>in</strong>ternational trade of crude presents opportunities to explore<br />
the <strong>in</strong>ternational crude markets and select and buy suitable crude <strong>in</strong> right size<br />
parcels at the right time from the right supplier so as to maximize ref<strong>in</strong>ery profits.<br />
This is a special area of <strong>in</strong>ternational trade where KRLhas no expertise at present<br />
but must soon build some, if not presently to get <strong>in</strong>to buy<strong>in</strong>g directly, but to<br />
monitor purchases for KRL by IOCL to see if its <strong>in</strong>terests are be<strong>in</strong>g protected<br />
properly. This is an area where expertise cannot be built overnight and therefore<br />
start<strong>in</strong>g early is important. With reference to shipp<strong>in</strong>g also the expertise and<br />
<strong>in</strong>volvement of KRL is m<strong>in</strong>imal. It is the OCC that through the Shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Corporation of India (SC!) arranges for all petroleum product related shipp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Therefore one is not sure whether the optimal size vessels are be<strong>in</strong>g used to<br />
transport crude at the most appropriate dates. There are chances that crude<br />
movement is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by seI ship availability.Ifthis is true, they willshift the<br />
burden of this <strong>in</strong>efficiency <strong>in</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g onto the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t moor<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
good option <strong>in</strong> overcom<strong>in</strong>g the problems <strong>in</strong> jetty operations. KRL must consider<br />
capacity addition with new technology because it will lead to <strong>in</strong>creased flexibility<br />
<strong>in</strong> crude oil selection. This will give the ref<strong>in</strong>ery more value-added products. It<br />
will also help <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ternational product specifications. KRL must<br />
develop its own market<strong>in</strong>g network for market<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. This will<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease the profit of the company and freedom <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g and selection of<br />
197
crude oil also will be more. Implementation of SCM will further improve the<br />
profitability of KRL.<br />
6.3 Logistics Operations <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> of KRL<br />
Practices <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound logistics are analysed <strong>in</strong><br />
this session. Inbound logistics be<strong>in</strong>g complexed, It is analysed separately and<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal and outbound logistics comb<strong>in</strong>ed together for the purpose of study. The<br />
objective of this part of the work was to study the processes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound<br />
logistics, and to analyse them for weaknesses and problems. Important tools used<br />
for the above were work study techniques study of documents and manuals, and<br />
discussion with managers and workers.<br />
6.3.1 Issues <strong>in</strong> logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, supply cha<strong>in</strong> is very important s<strong>in</strong>ce, this is a material<br />
movement <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>dustry. A block diagram show<strong>in</strong>g the supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Oil and petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry is shown <strong>in</strong> figure 6.1. The upstream sector faces the<br />
problem of decid<strong>in</strong>g which wells to tap for how much crude, so that over<br />
production does not have adverse impact on world oil prices. It also has to<br />
manage the logistics of storage of crude produced and arrange for sale and<br />
shipment of the same. Therefore crude tanker load<strong>in</strong>g operations form a critical<br />
operation for them. For a downstream operator, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, key supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
issuesare as given under:<br />
Crude oil Procurement: The major issues here be<strong>in</strong>g decisions<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g when to purchase? How much of what crude to purchase? And From<br />
whomto purchase?<br />
Crude oil shipp<strong>in</strong>g: This decision has to be exam<strong>in</strong>ed along with the<br />
Crude procurement decision. Here one has to decide when to ship from which<br />
load port <strong>in</strong> what capacity of ship. That is decid<strong>in</strong>g on the carriers for mov<strong>in</strong>gthe<br />
crude from the load port to the unload<strong>in</strong>g port.<br />
Unload<strong>in</strong>g port operations: When the crude carriers and ships for<br />
tak<strong>in</strong>g products come, they have to be received, berthed and crude unloaded or<br />
product loaded as required. The ma<strong>in</strong> problem that occurs here is restrictions put<br />
198
on vessel size due to draft limitations due to which more economical and larger<br />
vessels cannot be used for br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> crude. Delay<strong>in</strong> berth<strong>in</strong>g of vessels or <strong>in</strong> their<br />
sail<strong>in</strong>g out also occur at times due to lack of night navigation facilities (night<br />
pilotage). The ma<strong>in</strong> problem <strong>in</strong> relation to operation plann<strong>in</strong>g occurs due to the<br />
bunch<strong>in</strong>g of vessel arrivals creat<strong>in</strong>g a situation when there are many vessels<br />
wait<strong>in</strong>gfor berth<strong>in</strong>g, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> demurrage payment. There are also times when<br />
the berth is unoccupied and the crude handl<strong>in</strong>g facilities are idl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Crude Oil Storage: This area of ref<strong>in</strong>ery logistics has its special<br />
problems. The allocation of storage tanks to different types of crude is one such<br />
problem. This should be done <strong>in</strong> such a way that required ullage is available for<br />
the required crude at the time required. Also, enough storage capacity to act as an<br />
effective buffer between supply fluctuations on one hand and production demand<br />
variations on the other is essential. S<strong>in</strong>ce crude is an expensive commodity excess<br />
storage of the same should as far as possible avoided.<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery operations: The configuration of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery Le. the different<br />
units <strong>in</strong> it and their capacities and its range of operability should have be<br />
balanced. Bythis, it means that as far as possible there should be no need to build<br />
up <strong>in</strong>terstage buffers <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The ref<strong>in</strong>ery should also be flexible <strong>in</strong> terms<br />
of its ability to ref<strong>in</strong>e a wide variety of crude. Its operat<strong>in</strong>g characteristics should<br />
be such that more of distillates hav<strong>in</strong>g higher demand and giv<strong>in</strong>g more returns<br />
should be produced. The products produced should be requir<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ished product storage and blend<strong>in</strong>g: As <strong>in</strong> the case of crude oil<br />
tankage, a crucial decision here also is which tanks to allot to which products.<br />
Both offl<strong>in</strong>e and on l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g options are available. The former is the<br />
traditional method, and requires less <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> mach<strong>in</strong>ery, but requires more<br />
product storage tankage. On-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g is a more recent addition to ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
operations; it is <strong>in</strong>strumentation and automation <strong>in</strong>tensive option that<br />
significantly reduces the product tankage requirement and product <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
carried by the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.
parcel size is around a few thousand tons, the transportation is done by road <strong>in</strong><br />
Tanker lorries. This offers the greatest flexibility <strong>in</strong> route and parcel size and mix<br />
and is the only means of deliver<strong>in</strong>g products to retail outlets directly.<br />
Annual plans for crude and Product movement<br />
OEB<br />
•<br />
Monthly Crude Procurement Plan, ICM Monthly Product Sale plan and its movement, SPM<br />
'"<br />
Crude Shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Schedule CSM<br />
+<br />
/<br />
Crude Ship Arrival and Unload<strong>in</strong>g atKochi Port<br />
Storage ofcrude and settl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Charg<strong>in</strong>g to CDU 1 or 2 and other<br />
Plants<br />
Storage ofOutput and blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Sales and Transfer<br />
Storage Depots<br />
Tankers<br />
Figure 6.1 <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery limited<br />
200<br />
Issues: Crude Quantity Discrepancies,<br />
Terms ofCharter, Demurrage, Ocean and<br />
Unload<strong>in</strong>g losses.<br />
Issues: Storage capacities, tank allotments,<br />
Insufficient settl<strong>in</strong>g time, storage losses.<br />
Issues: Actual quantity charged, Process<br />
Optimization, Fuel and loss,<br />
Actual quantities produced.<br />
Issues: Actual quantity received, blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Optimization, tank allocation to products,<br />
Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g storage losses.<br />
Issues: Measurement ofquantity,<br />
Payment verification Bill<strong>in</strong>g and dispatch,<br />
Excise duty and sales tax account<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
payment,<br />
Reconciliation ofSales with stocks <strong>in</strong> tanks,<br />
Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g handl<strong>in</strong>g losses.<br />
I Wagon Load<strong>in</strong>g
The railway wagon rake is used to transport products to big storage depots<br />
of market<strong>in</strong>g companies located at railway sid<strong>in</strong>gs. The third means of transport<br />
is the pipel<strong>in</strong>e; this is only economical if bulk movement is required. The only<br />
problem with this is its very high <strong>in</strong>itial cost, but the operation cost ofthis is very<br />
low. The rigidity of route and fixed source and dest<strong>in</strong>ation is another problem<br />
with this means of transport. This is used for short distance transport of bulk<br />
products to market<strong>in</strong>g company depots and large users nearby. The nextmode of<br />
movement is by ships. This becomes economical only with large parcels and to<br />
greater distances. This is used for movement of products from one port location<br />
to another. It is also the only means many a time, for exports.<br />
The value addition that takes place <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is due to the separation of<br />
crude oil <strong>in</strong>to distillates and heavy ends that each have separate demands and<br />
uses. It is the total amount of crude that is processed that will ultimately <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
the bottom l<strong>in</strong>e. The supply cha<strong>in</strong> of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Ltd. can be divided <strong>in</strong>to the<br />
conventional three parts, of Inbound, Internal and outbound logistics. Inbound<br />
logisticsis discussed <strong>in</strong> the sections below.<br />
The Inbound logistics consists of all activities done to plan and implement<br />
procurement and delivery of crude necessary for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The movement of<br />
crude oil <strong>in</strong> the case of KRL is <strong>in</strong> discrete parcel form, unlike some ref<strong>in</strong>eries that<br />
have pipel<strong>in</strong>es from the oil fields. The only means of br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude to the<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery is by sea route. The ma<strong>in</strong> decision problems that are encountered <strong>in</strong> the<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g stage are discussed below.<br />
6.3.2 Monthly plans<br />
The monthly plann<strong>in</strong>g for crude supply and product movement is done<br />
through three important meet<strong>in</strong>g called the Industry Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation Meet<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />
Crude Slate Meet<strong>in</strong>g and the <strong>Supply</strong> Plan Meet<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
6.3.2.1 Industry Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation Meet<strong>in</strong>g (ICM)<br />
This is the monthly meet<strong>in</strong>g held to achieve the follow<strong>in</strong>g objectives:<br />
• To create a platform to br<strong>in</strong>g together all members of the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
for shar<strong>in</strong>g of the <strong>in</strong>dustry news and to plan for the future<br />
201
ahead<br />
• To discuss and review status of the short and medium term projects<br />
undertaken by the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
• Totake stock of the previous month performance for the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
• To discuss the current month's performance till date and plan changes<br />
required<br />
• To present the problems envisaged In the next month and discuss<br />
possible solutions<br />
• Discussand f<strong>in</strong>alize crude requirements for the month after next<br />
• To f<strong>in</strong>alize next month's crude requirements for the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
• To f<strong>in</strong>alize and match next month's production and requirements for the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
• To review <strong>in</strong>ventory status of crude and products<br />
This is the <strong>in</strong>dustry meet<strong>in</strong>g to make a roll<strong>in</strong>g plan for the three moths<br />
6.3.2.2 Crude Slate Meet<strong>in</strong>g (CSM)<br />
This meet<strong>in</strong>g is held after the ICM every month with OCC, IOC(Shipp<strong>in</strong>g),<br />
Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Corporation of India and the representatives from each ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
attend<strong>in</strong>g it. The aim of this meet<strong>in</strong>g is to f<strong>in</strong>alize the crude allocation to each<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery by decid<strong>in</strong>g the crude type and parcel size for different tankers, allott<strong>in</strong>g<br />
them to different ref<strong>in</strong>eries and schedul<strong>in</strong>g their arrivals at discharge ports. The<br />
crude requirement for next month of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery projected <strong>in</strong> the ICM is after<br />
consolidation by OCC(Technical) given to IOC(IT). They obta<strong>in</strong> quotes for crude.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>itial crude shipp<strong>in</strong>g schedule is then made <strong>in</strong> consultation with IOC<br />
(Shipp<strong>in</strong>g). Here, a model that takes as <strong>in</strong>put, data regard<strong>in</strong>g crude and crude<br />
tanker availability from load ports, crude requirement of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery and<br />
laydays available at load and discharge ports and gives as output and optimum<br />
crude allotment schedule is used. This schedule gives the type and quantity of<br />
crude allotted the tanker schedule to reach the discharge port for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
This crude allocation, and tanker schedule forms the basis for the CSM. The<br />
purpose of the CSM is to provide opportunities for the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
202
• Exchange two crude between two ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />
• Move one tanker scheduled for one ref<strong>in</strong>ery to another to take care of<br />
emergencies<br />
• To cancel or postpone certa<strong>in</strong> tanker schedules<br />
• To allot certa<strong>in</strong> unallotted crude available to the ref<strong>in</strong>eries that can process<br />
them<br />
• The result is the allotment and tanker schedule of crude<br />
• The Bill of Lad<strong>in</strong>g holder for all parcels for the month is also f<strong>in</strong>alized<br />
6.3.2.3 <strong>Supply</strong> Plan Meet<strong>in</strong>g (SPM)<br />
This meet<strong>in</strong>g is usually held on the day after the Crude Slate Meet<strong>in</strong>g. This<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g is held to plan for the movement of petroleum products from the<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>eries to the depots and from there to the sales outlets. This has to be done at<br />
least cost to meet the demand subject to constra<strong>in</strong>ts such as load<strong>in</strong>g capacity,<br />
rake availability, and ullage availability. As far as possible no ref<strong>in</strong>ery should<br />
have problem of excess products <strong>in</strong> store and therefore no ullage to keep newly<br />
produced product forc<strong>in</strong>g it to slow down throughput. The Production figures,<br />
and demand projections by the oil market<strong>in</strong>g companies dur<strong>in</strong>g the ICMare used<br />
by acc to prepare the <strong>in</strong>itial product allocation plan for different oil market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
companies. This serves as the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for discussions dur<strong>in</strong>g the SPM.<br />
The <strong>Supply</strong> Plan Meet<strong>in</strong>g is held <strong>in</strong> two parts the first part held <strong>in</strong> the<br />
morn<strong>in</strong>g has participants from OCC(Operations), OCC(Technical), Oil market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
companies and the representatives of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The objective ofthis meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is to f<strong>in</strong>alize the production numbers and off-takes from each ref<strong>in</strong>ery. This is<br />
then used by acc (Logistics) to do an LP run to get the plan for product<br />
evacuation from all ref<strong>in</strong>eries dur<strong>in</strong>g the next month. General issues regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g and distribution and the problems faced there are also discussed here.<br />
<strong>Indian</strong> Railways will jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the second half of the meet<strong>in</strong>g. This meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
deliberates on and f<strong>in</strong>alizes the rake allotment and wagon movement plan for the<br />
com<strong>in</strong>g month. This is a meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> which the oil market<strong>in</strong>g companies and the<br />
<strong>Indian</strong> railways play the major role <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. KRL's role is limited <strong>in</strong><br />
safe guard<strong>in</strong>g its <strong>in</strong>terest of see<strong>in</strong>g that the f<strong>in</strong>ished product <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>in</strong> its stock<br />
203
ema<strong>in</strong> as low as possible, and on no occasion chok<strong>in</strong>g of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery occurs<br />
because of non-movement of products.<br />
The process units <strong>in</strong> KRL have flexibility to process different types of crude<br />
oil. However, <strong>in</strong> order to facilitate production of Benzene and Toluene, the<br />
company has to process approximately 3.5 MMTPA of Bombay High or<br />
equivalent high aromatic type of crude oil. Presently, the crude mix to be<br />
processed <strong>in</strong> a particular year is broadly decided dur<strong>in</strong>g negotiations with the<br />
Government for f<strong>in</strong>alization of the MoD document for the Year. The monthly<br />
allocation is generally <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the agreed crude oil mix <strong>in</strong> the MoD and is<br />
decided dur<strong>in</strong>g the monthly crude slate meet<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Government has now permitted the private sector ref<strong>in</strong>eries and jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
venture ref<strong>in</strong>eries to source their own crude oil directly. However, pure ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
companies <strong>in</strong> the public sector viz. KRL, MRL and BRPL and the Oil Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gand<br />
Market<strong>in</strong>g companies viz. HPCL and BPCL cannot directly import crude oil. The<br />
crude oil requirement for these companies is still be<strong>in</strong>g canalised by IOCL.<br />
However, after complete deregulation of the petroleum sector slated after 2002,<br />
procurement of crude oil would be decanalised and hence KRL has to make its<br />
own arrangements for sourc<strong>in</strong>g and procurement of crude oil.<br />
It is imperative that KRL acquire adequate expertise <strong>in</strong> sourc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
procurement of crude oil <strong>in</strong> advance to maximize the profits of the company<br />
under deregulated scenario. About 95% of the total operat<strong>in</strong>g cost of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
usually are represented by cost of crude oil. The decision on crude selection<br />
shouldbe based on net back analysis and product supply commitments.<br />
6.3.3 Inbound Logistics Operations<br />
Inbound logistics starts with the selection of crude and its procurement<br />
function for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The current practice is to evaluate the crude proposed by<br />
acc and if found suitable to ask for the same <strong>in</strong> the OEB and the ICM<br />
submissions. Firm figures of when and how much of what crude KRL will get<br />
comes only after the crude slate meet<strong>in</strong>g. These are only plan figures and actual<br />
figures, specially the date of tanker arrival at Kochi varies much from slated<br />
dates. The type of crude rarely varies but the quantity varies by about plus or<br />
m<strong>in</strong>us 5 percentage and the date of discharge varies by about 2 to 3 days.<br />
204
With reference to shipp<strong>in</strong>g also the expertise and <strong>in</strong>volvement of KRL is<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imal. It is the OCC that through the Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Corporation of India (SC!)<br />
arranges for all petroleum product related shipp<strong>in</strong>g. Therefore one is not sure<br />
whether the optimal size vessels are be<strong>in</strong>g used to transport crude at the most<br />
appropriate dates. There are chances that crude movement is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by SCI<br />
ship availability. This if true, will shift the burden of this <strong>in</strong>efficiency <strong>in</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
onto the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Thus KRL should build expertise <strong>in</strong> these two important areas<br />
on a priority basis.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>bound logistics operations consists of three important parts (i) the<br />
receiv<strong>in</strong>g, berth<strong>in</strong>g and unload<strong>in</strong>g of the tankers (ii) the storage of crude oil <strong>in</strong><br />
Tank farm (iii) the account<strong>in</strong>g of crude receipts, shipp<strong>in</strong>g and related charges and<br />
their payment and settlement of disputes. All these functions are discussed <strong>in</strong><br />
separate sections below.<br />
6.3.3.1 Shipp<strong>in</strong>g and Jetty Operations for Crude<br />
Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries uses Kochi port for gett<strong>in</strong>g all its crude. The ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
which has a process<strong>in</strong>g capacity of 7.5 million metric tons of crude per annum,<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>es 4.26 MT of Bombay high crude, 2.08 MT of imported Lowsulfur crude and<br />
1MTof imported high sulfur Persian Gulf crude dur<strong>in</strong>g 1999-2000. This results <strong>in</strong><br />
the requirement to handle on an average of about 17 crude tankers per month<br />
(m<strong>in</strong>imum of 4 tankers <strong>in</strong> May to maximum of 24 tankers <strong>in</strong> December). The<br />
parcel size of these tankers varied from 24,918 MT to 59,932 MT with the mean at<br />
38,927 MT (April 98 to March 99 data).<br />
The Kochi Port has three jetties for oil handl<strong>in</strong>g called South Tanker berth<br />
(STB), North tanker berth (NTB) and the Coch<strong>in</strong> Oil term<strong>in</strong>al (COT). Some more<br />
details regard<strong>in</strong>g these are given <strong>in</strong> table 6.1. It may be noted that though the<br />
maximum pump<strong>in</strong>g rate is shown at 2500 MT per hour this is not achieved <strong>in</strong><br />
practice. From the data for 1998-99 it can be seen that the actual pump<strong>in</strong>g rates<br />
for the ships range from about 1000 to 2000 with the average be<strong>in</strong>g 1500MT per<br />
Hour. This be<strong>in</strong>g the case, a simple calculation shown below reveals that about<br />
57% of the year crude pump<strong>in</strong>g should be work<strong>in</strong>g to meet the ref<strong>in</strong>ery's<br />
requirement. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the fact that monsoon limits operations to 50% of<br />
205
normal levels dur<strong>in</strong>g four months of the year the pump<strong>in</strong>g requirement for the<br />
rest of the year becomes 68 %. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the fact that about 204 crude tankers<br />
have to be handled per year, and that pump<strong>in</strong>g of crude cannot take place dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the 12 hours gap that comes between pump<strong>in</strong>g from successive tankers the crude<br />
pipel<strong>in</strong>e utilization goes up to 103 percentage. This creates an impossible<br />
situation. Thus there is urgent need to <strong>in</strong>crease the average pump<strong>in</strong>g capacity of<br />
the crude from the ships.<br />
Hours ofpump<strong>in</strong>g required per year = Le. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery capacity/pump<strong>in</strong>g rate = 7500000/1500 =5000<br />
hrs.<br />
A.<br />
B.<br />
Pump<strong>in</strong>g time required = (Hours ofpump<strong>in</strong>g/ Hours <strong>in</strong> a year)*1 00=(5000/8760)*1 00=57 %<br />
Pump<strong>in</strong>g time with monsoon = (5000/(24*30.4*8+12*30.4*4))*100<br />
=68%<br />
C. Percentage ofpump<strong>in</strong>g time with monsoon and berth<strong>in</strong>g time allowance of 12 hours<br />
between a ship departure and a berth<strong>in</strong>g =(5000/{(24*30.4*8+12*30.4*4)-204*12})*100<br />
=103 %<br />
D. The same calculation as C. but with <strong>in</strong>ter ship time 18 hours <strong>in</strong>stead of 12<br />
=(5000/{(24*30.4*8+12*30.4*4)-204*18})*1 00=137 %<br />
E. The same calculation as C. but with <strong>in</strong>ter ship time 24 hours <strong>in</strong>stead of 12<br />
=(5000/{(24*30.4*8+12*30.4*4)-204*24})*100= 208 %<br />
Based on the above calculations results are presented <strong>in</strong> table 6.4. It shows<br />
the effect of change <strong>in</strong> average pump<strong>in</strong>g rate, and <strong>in</strong>ter ship gap <strong>in</strong> berth<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
the need for utilization of crude l<strong>in</strong>es from jettyto KRL.<br />
Table 6.3 Details of Berths available atKochi fortforoil handl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Name of Jetty Draft <strong>in</strong> Feet below Pump<strong>in</strong>g rate <strong>in</strong><br />
Chart datum MT per Hr.<br />
Kochi Oil Term<strong>in</strong>al (COT) 38 2500 Crude<br />
Oil handled<br />
North Tanker berth (NTB) 30 2500 Crude and Products<br />
South Tanker berth (STB) 29 2500 Products<br />
Table 6.4 Analysis show<strong>in</strong>g thecrude handl<strong>in</strong>g bottleneck atKochi port<br />
Average pump<strong>in</strong>g Rate MTper Hr. 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500<br />
A. Normal Crude pump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> % 68.49 57.08 48.92 42.80 38.05 34.25<br />
B. with monsoon allowance <strong>in</strong> % 82.24 68.53 58.74 51.40 45.69 41.12<br />
C. with monsoon allowance+12hrs% 123.76 103.14 88.40 77.35 68.76 61.88<br />
D.with monsoon allowance+18hrs% 165.56 137.97 118.26 103.48 91.98 82.78<br />
E. with monsoon allowance+24hrs% 250 208.33 178.57 156.25 138.89 125<br />
206
Recommendations<br />
It has been proved beyond doubt that the crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations at<br />
Kochi Port is a major bottleneck. Therefore means of augment<strong>in</strong>g this facility has<br />
to be planned and implemented at the earliest. As a very temporary measure one<br />
has to ensure that pump<strong>in</strong>g of crude from tankers is at near maximum allowable<br />
pressures. Ships that are not capable of meet<strong>in</strong>g this pump<strong>in</strong>g requirement<br />
should be avoided, especially <strong>in</strong> months when above 16 ships have to be received.<br />
It is seen that soon after monsoon there is a crude <strong>in</strong>ventory build-up. Ifthis is<br />
not for strategic and defense related reasons (KRL crude stock be<strong>in</strong>g a part of<br />
India's strategic oil reserves) then the crude <strong>in</strong>ventory need not be built up <strong>in</strong> the<br />
months of October to December. It can be built to sufficiently high levels dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the period from January to mid-May, just before the onset of the monsoon; this<br />
strategy will result <strong>in</strong> reduced <strong>in</strong>ventory carry<strong>in</strong>g charges for crude. It may<br />
however be noted that, the crude pipel<strong>in</strong>e discharge constra<strong>in</strong>t will come <strong>in</strong> the<br />
way of implement<strong>in</strong>g the above suggestion fully. It was also be noted that one of<br />
the four chicksuns at COT is not be<strong>in</strong>g used for some time now, this disuse of a<br />
very expensive piece of equipment will render it useless after some time.<br />
Therefore the recommendation is that arrangements to use three of the four<br />
chicksuns by rotation should be done.<br />
6.3.3.3 Short Term Solutions Recommended<br />
A. As a short-term measure, the use of drag reducers to improve discharge<br />
rates of crude from the tankers may be considered. However the ma<strong>in</strong> problems<br />
withits use are the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
There will be some capital <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong>itially to have the necessary<br />
equipment for the <strong>in</strong>jection of GEL Flow improvers <strong>in</strong>to the crude l<strong>in</strong>es. The<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g cost with this type of solution is comparatively high because of high<br />
cost of the GEL used. There are fears that its use might affect the quality of<br />
distillates especially the ATF and JP-5. KRL pipel<strong>in</strong>e is old and if corroded, the<br />
greater pipe roughness will adversely affect the performance of the drag reducer.<br />
As compared to smooth flat terra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> most parts where pipel<strong>in</strong>es are laid, KRL<br />
crude pipel<strong>in</strong>es have sharper bends, which have adverse affect on drag reducer<br />
211
performance. The use of these has proven economical for long distance pipel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
It is not much <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong> short distance pipel<strong>in</strong>es, such as KRL's crudepipel<strong>in</strong>e. At<br />
best also it can only be a short-term solution because of the above limitations,<br />
and not a permanent one.<br />
B. Another short-term solution is to make arrangements for br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Suez<br />
max tankers to COT. These tankers could be used just before monsoonsto build<br />
up the crude <strong>in</strong>ventory. These tankers may br<strong>in</strong>g crude parcels of about80,000<br />
MT. The major issues that have to be catered to make this possible are the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
A draft survey of the channel and COT area has to be undertaken to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />
the patches where ma<strong>in</strong>tenance dredg<strong>in</strong>g will have to be done to meet the draft<br />
requirement of Suez-max vessels. The capacity of the fenders at COT has to be<br />
checked to f<strong>in</strong>d if it is capable of tak<strong>in</strong>g the shock of impact by the Suez-max<br />
vesselwith the crude parcel. Ifnot sufficient augmentation of fender capacity has<br />
to be made. Another way of handl<strong>in</strong>g this problem is with the <strong>in</strong>stallation of a<br />
velocity meter at COTthat will call out the velocity of the tanker as it approaches<br />
the berth. This will be known to the pilot, and the tugs help<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> berth<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> better control of the approach<strong>in</strong>g velocity, so that the impact on the<br />
fenders is reduced. Arrangement for moor<strong>in</strong>g of the longer Suez-max vessel. The<br />
fore and aft moor<strong>in</strong>gs of the tanker will require, <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g more bollards. A cost<br />
effective solution <strong>in</strong> this matter could be us<strong>in</strong>g float<strong>in</strong>g dolph<strong>in</strong> buoys with<br />
pelican hooks to moor the Suez-max tankers. The breast l<strong>in</strong>es from the Suez-max<br />
tankers could be tied to the exist<strong>in</strong>g bollards. The next problem that could be<br />
encountered is when the vessel has to be turned before sail<strong>in</strong>g off. From the<br />
discussions with some CPT personnel <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a pilot, it was noticed that the<br />
present turn<strong>in</strong>g circle is large enough for a Suez-max vessel to turn. This was also<br />
demonstrated when one suez-max tanker was brought to CPT<br />
C. The best short term solution appears to be to make arrangements for<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the pipel<strong>in</strong>e now be<strong>in</strong>g used for Blackoil movement from plant to jetty for<br />
the purpose of crude pump<strong>in</strong>g when it is free and not be<strong>in</strong>g used for product<br />
movement. This is made possible will considerably decrease the ship unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />
212
times associated demurrage and will help remove the crude pipel<strong>in</strong>e capacity<br />
bottleneck to a very great extent.<br />
6.3.3.4 Permanent Solution-S<strong>in</strong>gle Po<strong>in</strong>t Moor<strong>in</strong>g (SPM)<br />
The Proposal for the S<strong>in</strong>gle Po<strong>in</strong>t Moor<strong>in</strong>g system be<strong>in</strong>g exam<strong>in</strong>ed by KRL<br />
appears to be the only stable and permanent solution to this problem. It is the<br />
type of solution that is required for this press<strong>in</strong>g need for more crude unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />
facility. It was noticed that KRL is exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two alternative proposals, one <strong>in</strong><br />
which the SPM will be located nearer to the shore at a site where only vessels of<br />
up to LR-2 make or Suez-max can be accommodated. The second proposal is to<br />
locate the SPM at a site further off the coast at a site where the draft is enough for<br />
handl<strong>in</strong>g VLCC vessels also.<br />
At this po<strong>in</strong>t it is important to make two observations regard<strong>in</strong>g project<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g and implementation that were observed dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of this study.<br />
The first relates to the time horizon of strategic plans of KRL. Most plans<br />
implemented by KRL were with the present and medium time <strong>in</strong> view. A long<br />
term perspective to project selection and implementation, when deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
facility creation, will be more desirable now with the open<strong>in</strong>g up of the oil sector.<br />
At this po<strong>in</strong>t it is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that the <strong>in</strong>itial crude pipel<strong>in</strong>e laid for the 2.75 MT<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery laid at the time of <strong>in</strong>itial commission<strong>in</strong>g of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, has enough<br />
surplus capacity to more or less cater to the current requirement of the expanded<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery with 7.5 MMTPA capacity. This foresight has to be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed especially<br />
when creat<strong>in</strong>g key facilities, where <strong>in</strong>cremental addition of facility later make it<br />
difficult and prohibitively expensive once the project is over.<br />
The second observation is regard<strong>in</strong>g project implementation. KRL's<br />
strengths are <strong>in</strong> selection equipment and of partners for project implementation.<br />
However, one important th<strong>in</strong>g that is often overlooked is the way the facility will<br />
be operated after commission<strong>in</strong>g (that is the operability po<strong>in</strong>t of view). It is worth<br />
not<strong>in</strong>g here that small changes and facilities if <strong>in</strong>corporated to facilitate<br />
operations will go a long way is improv<strong>in</strong>g system performance. The<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ability aspects are also underplayed at design and commission<strong>in</strong>g stage,<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> permanent problems for the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance staff. This problem is not<br />
213
unique of KRL; it is also the problem of most other project organizations. When<br />
evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the benefits of SPM proposal it is important to consider at least the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>gbenefits that KRL will get from it:<br />
• Inventory carry<strong>in</strong>g cost released from reduced need for <strong>in</strong>ventory carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Netback from utilization of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity that was unutilized due to<br />
lack of crude supplies<br />
• Sav<strong>in</strong>gs from reduced demurrage paid to crude tankers<br />
• Sav<strong>in</strong>gs from crude transportation charges occurr<strong>in</strong>g due to use of larger<br />
tankers for crude transport<br />
• Crude handl<strong>in</strong>g charges that can be apportioned from ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g charges of<br />
future expansion<br />
• Money released from cancellation of the need of some new crude storage<br />
tanks that are planned for the capacity addition project, because of release<br />
of some crude storage tanks from the current set as a result of reduced<br />
crude storage requirement with SPM.<br />
• Sav<strong>in</strong>gs from reduction <strong>in</strong> charges to be paid to Kochi port trust for crude<br />
handl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
6.3.3.5 Tankers com<strong>in</strong>g to Kochi and their performance<br />
In the days of APM costs were not much of a concern especially s<strong>in</strong>ce, the<br />
shipp<strong>in</strong>g costs that were paid from a common pool account. The post APM<br />
conditions make it necessary to monitor this important cost closely. It is but<br />
natural that different ships have different features that make some more cost<br />
effective <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> routes compared to others. The important features of a crude<br />
tanker from KRL po<strong>in</strong>t of view are the follow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
• The flag of the ship, this is important s<strong>in</strong>ce port charges are less for <strong>Indian</strong><br />
ships.<br />
• The hire charges per day and other charges such as fuel etc. for the tanker.<br />
• Familiarity of the master and crew with CPT and KRL.<br />
• The carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the vessel. The nearer the carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the<br />
vessel to the parcel size planned the more economical would it be.<br />
• The loaded draft requirement of the vessel. This should be with<strong>in</strong> what is<br />
available at COT.<br />
• The number of pumps on board and theirdischarge capacity. This should<br />
be at least the maximum KRL can allow.<br />
214
In order to understand which tankers have comparatively lower freights, it<br />
was collected and analyzed the freight data for some ships that have come to CPT<br />
with crude for KRL <strong>in</strong> the past, this data was collected from the crude cell. The<br />
tankers have been classified <strong>in</strong>to those that came with imported crude, and those<br />
that come with BH crude. The classifications of tankers that come with crude for<br />
KRL are given <strong>in</strong> the table 6.5.<br />
Table 6.5 Ships and theirdetails<br />
TYPE OWlCapacity<br />
Max pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rate<br />
OWl Load for<br />
KRL<br />
Draft Reqmt<br />
(full)<br />
MR 40,000 2040 Vhr 37,000 10M<br />
LR 1 63,000 2720Vhr 49,000 12 M<br />
LR2 87,000 4080Vhr 58,000 14 M<br />
Suez max 1,47,000 6125Vhr 80,000 16 M<br />
The study of ship-wise performance has not been a practice at KRL<br />
because the crude shipp<strong>in</strong>g costs were met from a common pool account dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
APM. This situation is slowly chang<strong>in</strong>g; therefore ship-wise performance track<strong>in</strong>g<br />
has become important now. As a beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to this exercise the data was collected<br />
for all crude tanker arrivals dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998-1999 and analyzed for ship wise<br />
performance. The summary of the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs is presented <strong>in</strong> Table 6.5. The<br />
important parameters shown <strong>in</strong> the table and their significance will now be<br />
discussed. The tanker names are used to identify them. The total crude brought<br />
by each tanker dur<strong>in</strong>g the period of 1998-99 and the number of trips made by<br />
each are used to calculate the average parcel size brought by the tanker to CPT.<br />
This data gives <strong>in</strong>formation about how regular a tanker is <strong>in</strong> the KRL circuit and<br />
the amount of part load<strong>in</strong>g that is done for it. The next column gives the mean<br />
NOR to berth<strong>in</strong>g time this is the measure of the average time the tanker spends<br />
outside CPT wait<strong>in</strong>g to be berthed and this is ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to bunch<strong>in</strong>g of ship<br />
arrivals or due to longer berth occupancy by the previous tanker due to slow<br />
discharge.<br />
The data <strong>in</strong> the next column is regard<strong>in</strong>g the mean time from berth<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
start of discharge. This time should be around two hours and is someth<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
has to be controlled if it is consistently high for some vessel the reasons for the<br />
same have to be looked <strong>in</strong>to.<br />
215
Table 6.6 Performance of tankers that brought KRL crude <strong>in</strong> 1998-99<br />
Tanker Name Total No Averag Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean<br />
(1) Crude of e NOR Berth pump<strong>in</strong> End Hrs of Demurrage Discha<br />
(2) Trip Parcel to to gtime pump over stay atRs. rge<br />
s size Berth pump Hrs to excess 20,000 Per rate <strong>in</strong><br />
(3) (4) Hrs. Hrs. (7). sail of36 hrs Hr TI Hr.<br />
(5) (6) Hrs. (9) (10) (11)<br />
(8)<br />
ABTarapore 315708 8 39463 42.66 5.59 24.84 3.31 40.91 818125 1598<br />
AFriendshi 50084 1 50084 7.25 2.25 36.00 0.50 10.00 200000 1391<br />
Abdul Hamid 88430 2 44215 51.00 2.13 26.88 1.25 45.25 905000 1640<br />
Addai 43274 1 43274 3.50 4.50 42.00 0.75 14.75 295000 1030<br />
AJex 24918 1 24918 107.3 7.50 17.75 0.50 97.00 1940000 1404<br />
AJ<strong>in</strong>a 55566 1 55566 60.25 3.25 40.50 1.00 69.00 1380000 1372<br />
BCChattergi 377251 12 31438 28.90 7.17 21.77 1.46 25.46 509167 1453<br />
BRAmbedkar 444657 9 49406 82.33 6.42 31.72 2.33 86.80 1736000 1574<br />
CPShivaji 571567 12 47631 35.81 4.81 36.05 2.92 43.60 871917 1399<br />
CVRaman 680654 23 29594 36.39 4.45 18.80 3.02 27.83 556522 1616<br />
GB SSalaria 260881 6 43480 56.08 2.04 26.75 2.88 52.13 1042500 1631<br />
Homi Bhaba 550963 19 28998 36.78 3.45 19.87 1.96 27.66 553105 1484<br />
JNS<strong>in</strong>gh 79152 2 39576 28.63 2.00 18.50 6.00 19.13 382500 2260<br />
JNehru 142954 3 47651 17.50 4.75 25.25 0.67 16.25 325000 1899<br />
Jadu S<strong>in</strong>gh 46333 1 46333 2.25 2.00 23.00 0.75 0.00 0 2014<br />
Jadunath S<strong>in</strong>gh 40681 1 40681 6.50 2.00 22.25 4.75 0.00 0 '1828<br />
Jog<strong>in</strong>der S<strong>in</strong>gh 40406 1 40406 114.0 4.00 24.00 8.75 114.75 2295000 1684<br />
LMTilak 205236 4 51309 61.31 1.94 57.94 8.44 93.63 1872500 943<br />
MD SThapa 429279 11 39025 57.18 2.23 24.75 1.36 49.89 997727 1591<br />
MJNS<strong>in</strong>gh 152248 4 38062 53.50 2.06 21.25 2.56 43.38 867500 1791<br />
Mkarve 44553 1 44553 20.50 5.25 39.75 0.50 30.00 600000 1121<br />
Motilal Nehru 235226 5 47045 43.75 4.10 27.25 3.15 43.15 862920 1719<br />
NSBose 265514 6 44252 24.67 3.33 30.42 2.54 25.13 502500 1501<br />
NShivChand 94524 2 47262 101.0 1.75 23.00 3.00 92.75 1855000 2059<br />
Piru S<strong>in</strong>gh 317921 8 39740 54.34 3.63 24.25 2.31 49.56 991250 1641<br />
RN Tagore 245309 8 30664 56.84 1.94 20.43 2.63 47.49 949875 1497<br />
RRRane 315597 8 39450 49.09 2.63 24.28 3.41 43.41 868125 1642<br />
RatnaAbha 243489 6 40582 82.13 3.38 21.77 0.71 72.18 1443667 1881<br />
SSarma 342843 9 38094 45.53 5.03 22.60 0.83 39.43 788667 1684<br />
Saitan S<strong>in</strong>gh 269795 7 38542 33.32 2.21 25.93 1.32 28.39 567857 1485<br />
Satya Moorty 153235 3 51078 59.25 2.58 38.33 1.92 66.08 1321667 1346<br />
Vivekananda 239897 5 47979 48.20 3.30 39.25 0.81 55.56 1111200 1231<br />
216
6.3.3.6 The Simulation Model Experiments<br />
The computer simulation based model for model<strong>in</strong>g the crude tanker<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g operations at Kochi Port discussed <strong>in</strong> chapter 4 section 4.6.4 . This<br />
model forms the base of the Decision Support System (DSS) that provides for the<br />
"What if Analysis' for crude slate meet<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
This model has been modified and used to study the effect of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the number of tankers that are brought to Kochi Port on the cost per ton for<br />
crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations. The performance measure called 'Cost per Ton for<br />
crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations', was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the formula given below:<br />
Cost per tone for crude unload<strong>in</strong>g = (Total Days spent by all<br />
ships that came to unload crude at Kochi port) x (24) x (Rs20000) /<br />
Total tonnage of crude unloaded<br />
Table 4.5 Relationship between ship hire costper ton and number ofships per month<br />
Number ofships Total ship hire cost Total ofCrude Cost pertonfor crude<br />
permonth for unload<strong>in</strong>g days tonnage unloaded unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />
8 7200000 360000 20<br />
9 8160000 405001 20.15<br />
10 8160000 450001 18.13<br />
11 9120000 495000 18.42<br />
12 11040000 540000 20.44<br />
13 12000000 540000 22.22<br />
14 16320000 585001 27.9<br />
15 24480000 585000 41.85<br />
16 32160000 585000 54.97<br />
17 39840000 585000 68.1<br />
18 47520000 585000 81.23<br />
19 55200000 585000 94.36<br />
20 62880000 585000 107.49<br />
21 69120000 585001 118.15<br />
22 75840000 585001 129.64<br />
23 85920000 585000 146.87<br />
24 93600000 585000 160<br />
25 99840000 585000 170.67<br />
26 108480000 585000 185.44<br />
27 109440000 630000 190.71<br />
28 118080000 585001 201.85<br />
29 125760000 585000 214.97<br />
30 137280000 585000 234.67<br />
218
6.3.3.7 Storage of Crude<br />
KRL has two tank farms for the storage of crude. The first is the old tank<br />
farm, which has 7 tanks for crude storage. The second and later addition is the<br />
Additional Crude Tankage Project (ACTP) that has 6 crude tanks. There is a 30<br />
<strong>in</strong>ches (<strong>in</strong>ternal dia 29.5 <strong>in</strong>ches) pipel<strong>in</strong>e from the Jetty to the Old tank farm. This<br />
crude l<strong>in</strong>e now extends to the ACTP. Therefore there is facility to receive crude<br />
from one tanker each berthed at either COT or NTB at a time. The other could<br />
meanwhile prepare for discharg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Crude from a vessel is usually received <strong>in</strong>to one tank and when it is full the<br />
connection is slowly switched over to another tank. The pipel<strong>in</strong>e connections <strong>in</strong><br />
the crude tank farms is <strong>in</strong> such a way that at any given time crude from two tanks<br />
with different crude can be separately charged to different units i.e., CDU 1 or<br />
CDU 2. But LSPG and BH from Group 2 cannot be separately charged to CDU 1<br />
and CDU 2 at the same time s<strong>in</strong>ce there is only one l<strong>in</strong>e for charg<strong>in</strong>g from Group<br />
2. One tank from each group can be <strong>in</strong>dependently charged to CDU 1 and CDU 2.<br />
Similarlyone tank form both the groups can be charged to both CDUl and CDU2<br />
simultaneously. At KRL, CDU 1 is usually run on Imported High Sulfur crude<br />
almost 40 % of the time. Rest of the time it runs on Imported Low Sulfur crude or<br />
on Bombay High crude depend<strong>in</strong>g on the requirements of heavy ends. Whereas,<br />
CDU 2 always runs on imported low sulfur crude or on Bombay High crude.<br />
6.3.3.8 Crude Arrival and Consumption<br />
The current pattern of crude arrival and consumption at KRL is discussed<br />
here. The data used is of 1998-99. A look at the figure 6.10 shows the monthly<br />
crude arrival pattern. It can be seen that crude arrivals were low <strong>in</strong> April, May<br />
and June. The low arrival from April to mid-May should not be allowed, that is<br />
the month when maximum pre-monsoon build up of stock should be done. The<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory hold<strong>in</strong>g cost can be reduced by postpon<strong>in</strong>g the crude stock build up to<br />
the last month, rather that build<strong>in</strong>g it up <strong>in</strong> February and March itself. Itcan also<br />
be seen that it is BH crude arrivals that undergo greater fluctuations.<br />
221
• Plant ma<strong>in</strong>tenance or shutdowns<br />
• Net back for different options<br />
Automation <strong>in</strong> the plant has been achieved to a great extent at KRL. The<br />
problem however is that these plant automation systems operate as separate<br />
islands and they do not have any l<strong>in</strong>k with the management <strong>in</strong>formation system.<br />
The management <strong>in</strong>formation system has to still rely on the figures reported from<br />
each unit on paper or by phone. This results <strong>in</strong> different versions of the same fact<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g reported, the authentication of which is a major trouble. It also gives<br />
opportunities for temporarily hid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>efficiencies. An Information system based<br />
on data collected from the <strong>in</strong>struments directly would serve the purpose of<br />
management better.<br />
Hav<strong>in</strong>g verified the sales to the market<strong>in</strong>g companies now the production<br />
and sales of different products <strong>in</strong> different months of a year can be studied and<br />
understand the seasonality <strong>in</strong> demand. The difference between production and<br />
sale are also noted to determ<strong>in</strong>e periods <strong>in</strong> which there are stock buildups and<br />
stock erosions. The figures 6.13 to 6.23 shows the variation of stock and sales<br />
40000<br />
30000 +-+ -<br />
:E 20000<br />
.S<br />
B 10000<br />
o<br />
·10000<br />
Figure 6.13 LPG Production and sales<br />
LPG Production and Sales<br />
_ Prod" _ Sale Difference<br />
6 7<br />
Month<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 1998-99. The l<strong>in</strong>e is used to show the difference between<br />
production and sales to represent stock build-up or erosion. The figure 6.13<br />
shows the Production and Sales of LPG dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 1998-99. It shows that<br />
the production and sale of LPG rema<strong>in</strong>s nearly equal <strong>in</strong> most months. Only <strong>in</strong><br />
March the sale was significantly more that production. The months of May and;<br />
June had low overall production that reflects <strong>in</strong> the production of LPG too. The<br />
production and sale of MS is shown <strong>in</strong> figure 6.14. The production <strong>in</strong> the month<br />
224
JP-5. the aviation fuel used by the defense also shows higher demand<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g monsoon. In its case the stock builds up and slow depletion can be clearly<br />
seen <strong>in</strong> figure 6.19.<br />
!i<br />
14 00<br />
120 0<br />
100 0 ... eoo<br />
-li<br />
S<br />
400<br />
200<br />
•<br />
· 200<br />
. 400<br />
· 60 0<br />
Figure 6.19 JP·5 Produ ction and sales<br />
Monlhtr JP ·5 Production 1"1S SII,<br />
The production and sale of LOO also varies very much from month to<br />
month. It is more <strong>in</strong> demand dur<strong>in</strong>g monsoon and w<strong>in</strong>ter. The high demand<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g February could be <strong>in</strong> anticipation of Price rise. In this case also stock is<br />
built up <strong>in</strong> a month and this is carried till it is consumed <strong>in</strong> a later month by<br />
excess demand.<br />
8000<br />
6000<br />
41)00<br />
S • 2000<br />
5<br />
0<br />
·2000<br />
·4000<br />
Figure 6.20 LOO productIon andsales<br />
Monthly LOO Production In d Sail<br />
_ Prodn<br />
Month<br />
Figure 6.21 shows monthly production and demand of LSHS are unequal<br />
<strong>in</strong> most months lead<strong>in</strong>g to a build up or depletion of stock. The last quarter<br />
buy<strong>in</strong>g before the budget or <strong>in</strong>creased production for push<strong>in</strong>g the product <strong>in</strong>to<br />
the market before budget. The production and sale of Furnace Oil is much more<br />
stable. For this product the strategy seems to be to produce only what is required<br />
andthe requirement be<strong>in</strong>g stable this is easier. Whenever stock depletes due to<br />
over demand it is topped up <strong>in</strong> the next period by more production.<br />
227
25000<br />
20000<br />
15000<br />
s 10000<br />
•
6.3.4.3 Despatch of Products<br />
Products are dispatched from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery by Pipel<strong>in</strong>es, Rail Wagons or<br />
Trucks. Products are also dispatched by sea <strong>in</strong> Tankers. In the sections below<br />
each one of these are separately presented.<br />
6.3.4.4 Despatch by coastal tankers<br />
KRL is located at a port town <strong>in</strong> the south of India. The location of KRL is<br />
ideal for gett<strong>in</strong>g crude supplies and for dispatch<strong>in</strong>g products by sea. The product<br />
demands are distributed throughout the country. For <strong>in</strong>land and local movement<br />
other means of transport have to be used. S<strong>in</strong>ce ship transport is most<br />
economical for bulk cargo movement, coastal tankers are used to move products<br />
to areas where there is greater demand. The major disadvantages associated with<br />
coastaltanker transfer of products are (i) tankers carry large parcel size rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from 25,000 T to 45,000 T of product. This necessitates build-up of more<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventories of products for mak<strong>in</strong>g use of this facility. There fore it may be noted<br />
that the amount of storage facility required for products moved by tankers willbe<br />
comparatively higher. (ii) The flexibility of cargo movement is severely<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ed by ports and the facilities they can provide.<br />
KRL has three product pipel<strong>in</strong>es from the Tank farm at the plant to the<br />
Jetty at Kochi Port. One of these l<strong>in</strong>es is used for black oil and the other two are<br />
used for white oil pump<strong>in</strong>g. The major products that are dispatched via tankers<br />
are HSD, Naphtha, MS, SKO, FO and LDO. Data was collected for monthly<br />
transfer of these products for 1998-99 and made separate graphs for each product.<br />
The purpose of this is to study the pattern of different product movement by this<br />
route. The graph below shows transfer of MS by tankers. From the figure 6.24 it<br />
was evident that around 20,000 to 30,000 Metric Tons (MT) of MS was sent every<br />
month by tankers. The graph regularly shows a zigzag shape mean<strong>in</strong>g that a<br />
30,000 month will be followed by a 20,000 parcel month, which will be followed<br />
by a 30,000 Tons MS parcel month and so on. The exception to this general rule is<br />
months that have very low production (possiblydue to shutdown). The graph that<br />
is presented <strong>in</strong> figure 6.24 is on monthly dispatch of Naphtha by tanker. The<br />
graph shows that Naphtha shipp<strong>in</strong>g by tanker is a regular affair with quantity<br />
231
In figure 6.24 shows the monthly dispatch of HSD by coastal tankers. The<br />
parcel size is seen to vary between 40,000 to 80,000 tons. However <strong>in</strong> some<br />
monsoon months this movement is nil. It was seen earlier that the storage<br />
capacity for HSD at KRL is low. Ifcoastal tanker movement is planned and there<br />
islate arrival of tanker KRL will have ullage problems. Therefore, monitor<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
tanker movement is very critical for operations. The next figure depicts the<br />
monthly dispatch of SKO by sea. Transfer can be seen to be higher dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
first half of the year. There is no SKO movement by sea dur<strong>in</strong>g monsoon months.<br />
The typical parcel sizes are 5,000 10,000 and 15,000 Tons. S<strong>in</strong>ce these parcel<br />
sizes are uneconomical for sea transport if done alone, product tankers com<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
takeother products should take this also.<br />
Figure 6.24 shows the monthly transfer of FO by sea. This can be seen to<br />
be more regular. Quantities between 20,000 tons and 30,000 tons are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
shipped <strong>in</strong> most months. This graph also shows monsoon does not have any<br />
effect of this pattern of shipp<strong>in</strong>g and also that <strong>in</strong> the second half of the year more<br />
quantity is shipped. The graph of LDO shipped given below shows that, small<br />
quantities of LDO rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1000 tons to 4000 tons is shipped this is to meet<br />
the bunker fuel requirements of tankers. The last graph <strong>in</strong> this series shows the<br />
total monthly product movement by sea. From this graph it is clear that <strong>in</strong> the<br />
first quarter of the year movement is much higher. April, May and June were<br />
months with very low transfer of products by sea. A maximum of 200,000 tons of<br />
products was dispatched by sea dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998-99. There is evidence of unutilized<br />
capacity for product movement from berth occupancy at STB and NTB.<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>g this route of product movement though less expensive <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
freight will necessitate the augmentation of product storage facility to take care of<br />
slips <strong>in</strong> the large parcels that are planned by tankers.<br />
Recommendations<br />
Currently KRL does not <strong>in</strong>volveitself much with product tanker movement<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce OMCs take care of it. Tanker schedules for movement of products have to<br />
be watched closely s<strong>in</strong>ce, KRL does not have enough tankage to hold the large<br />
tanker parcels <strong>in</strong> stock for too long <strong>in</strong> case tankers do not come on time.<br />
233
6.3.4.5 Despatch by Wagons<br />
The largest share of the products produced is dispatched from KRL by<br />
railway wagons. At KRL the wagon load<strong>in</strong>g facility consists of four gantries where<br />
about 37 wagons each can be placed. Wagon load<strong>in</strong>g facility is used for the<br />
dispatch of MS, SKO, HSD, FO and LSHS only. The important steps <strong>in</strong> load<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
wagons are listed below.<br />
1. Vacancyposition of the wagon-load<strong>in</strong>g gantry is reported to lrumbanam yard,<br />
from where halfthe rake (nearly 37 wagons) is pushed <strong>in</strong>to the load<strong>in</strong>g gantry.<br />
The railways are given about 40 m<strong>in</strong>utes for this.<br />
2. The wagons brought have to be shunted properly with additional gaps<br />
between every three of four wagons, so that the fill<strong>in</strong>g arms are <strong>in</strong> correct<br />
position. This is required because the gantry was designed for a rake with the<br />
old type of coupl<strong>in</strong>g, which has been replaced by a new shorter one by the<br />
railways. This requires about 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes.<br />
3. After the wagons are placed IOC gives KRL the wagon load<strong>in</strong>g memo<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the wagon numbers, their capacity, the product to be loaded <strong>in</strong><br />
each with the quantity and dip required noted for each wagon.<br />
4. Based on this the KRL supervisor of wagon load<strong>in</strong>g prepares wagon-load<strong>in</strong>g<br />
lists to be given to the workers for fill<strong>in</strong>gof wagons.<br />
5. The workers then close the bottom and master valves of all wagons and start<br />
to fillthe wagons to the dip read<strong>in</strong>gs required, care is taken not to overfill.<br />
6. Once fill<strong>in</strong>g is over, the IOC and KRL personnel jo<strong>in</strong>tly <strong>in</strong>spect the wagons.<br />
Dip read<strong>in</strong>gs are taken and topp<strong>in</strong>g up is done wherever necessary. The fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pipes and bridges will then be removed and the wagons sealed.<br />
7. The railways are now <strong>in</strong>formed that wagons have been filled and are advised<br />
to remove the filled wagons. For this they are given 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes. The time<br />
allowed between placement of wagons and report<strong>in</strong>g to railways about fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />
over is 300 m<strong>in</strong>utes. If KRL exceeds this an hourly demurrage of Rs.200 per<br />
wagon has to be paid by KRL to the railways.<br />
Recommendations<br />
There is need to <strong>in</strong>crease load<strong>in</strong>g of wagons. It was noted dur<strong>in</strong>g the study,<br />
that the operations at the wagon load<strong>in</strong>g yard has s<strong>in</strong>ce long fallen <strong>in</strong>to a very set<br />
pattern of work division between various shifts. Almost everyday operations take<br />
place <strong>in</strong> the same cycle; this convenient arrangement has resulted <strong>in</strong> a situation<br />
that it becomes difficult to improve s<strong>in</strong>ce, all have adapted to this system and<br />
therefore f<strong>in</strong>d the present system better. An <strong>in</strong>centive scheme to motivate<br />
personnel to break the old set pattern is one of the options that could be thought<br />
234
In order to understand the product portfolio dispatched by wagon and its<br />
seasonal variation, wagon dispatch data for 1998-99 was collected and analysed.<br />
The figure 6.25 shows the quantity of MS dispatched by wagons dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998-99.<br />
From the graph it can be seen that around 20,000 to 25,000 tons of MS is<br />
dispatched by railway wagons every month. These figures become lower only <strong>in</strong><br />
months when the production is lesser. The next graph presents the tonnage of<br />
SKO dispatched every month by wagons. This shows clear seasonal variation with<br />
two cycles. The quantity dispatched varies from 12,000 tons to 40,000 tons per<br />
month with highs around March and <strong>in</strong> July the lows are <strong>in</strong> June and November.<br />
The graph that is presented next is about the dispatch of HSD by wagons. This is<br />
without doubt the product that is handled <strong>in</strong> the largest quantity. The monthly<br />
dispatch of HSD ranges from 1,00,000 tons to 2,00,000 tons per month. There is<br />
seasonality to be seen here also with peaks <strong>in</strong> April and July. The graphs for<br />
transfer of FO and LSHS by wagons are given bellow. The quantity of FO<br />
dispatched varies from 2,000 to 6,000 tons while that of LSHS dispatched is<br />
higher and is between 2,000 and 10,000 tons.<br />
In order to show the total load of dispatch at wagon-load<strong>in</strong>g the graph<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g the total monthly product dispatch by rail from KRL is given. This<br />
clearly shows a tendency of peak<strong>in</strong>g towards mid year except that <strong>in</strong> May and<br />
June of 1998 when production was low the dispatch of products were also<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>gly lower.<br />
6.3.4.6 Despatch of Products by Road<br />
Almost all products produced at KRL are dispatched by the road route<br />
though <strong>in</strong> smaller quantities. The graphs show<strong>in</strong>g the dispatch of different<br />
products by road <strong>in</strong> 12 months of a year are shown <strong>in</strong> figure 6.26.<br />
236
Recommendations<br />
From the above study no bottle necks were identified at the truck load<strong>in</strong>g<br />
facility. This is shown by the low load<strong>in</strong>g bay occupancy and utilization figures.<br />
The bottleneck therefore, should be <strong>in</strong> the transaction part before or after<br />
load<strong>in</strong>g. KRL has already made most of the <strong>in</strong>vestment required <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up the<br />
new truck load<strong>in</strong>g facility. This has to be utilized well to <strong>in</strong>crease the return on<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestments. The utilization of this facility is currently low because of procedural<br />
bottlenecks before and after load<strong>in</strong>g. Locat<strong>in</strong>g these bottlenecks and remov<strong>in</strong>g<br />
them will be a challeng<strong>in</strong>g task for a manager. This will not require much <strong>in</strong><br />
terms of <strong>in</strong>vestment. Different agencies such as IOC, KRL security, and people at<br />
truck load<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>in</strong>volved. The complete process from natural arrivals of trucks<br />
<strong>in</strong> the park<strong>in</strong>g area to their fill<strong>in</strong>g and departure has to be studied <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong><br />
collaboration with IOC and the transaction process<strong>in</strong>g bottlenecks found and<br />
removed.<br />
In projects such as truck load<strong>in</strong>g the importance of facility design for<br />
better new operations is important. Designers concentrate on f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out what<br />
facilities will be required and <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g them available. The fact that these<br />
facilities are not <strong>in</strong>dependent of each other and that they will have to be str<strong>in</strong>ged<br />
together for smooth operations is many a time forgotten. The result be<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the <strong>in</strong>creased difficulty <strong>in</strong> operation so created has to be borne throughout the life<br />
ofthe facility. Thus the operation cost that is recurr<strong>in</strong>g goes up or efficiency goes<br />
down do<strong>in</strong>g permanent damage. KRL is good at project selection evaluation and<br />
f<strong>in</strong>alization of contractors. But, then it seems people loose <strong>in</strong>terest and project<br />
implementation attracts less attention. The test<strong>in</strong>g and commission<strong>in</strong>g though a<br />
very important activity is not that well planned and executed. To highlight the<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t it can be discussed some issues related to the truck load<strong>in</strong>g facility that<br />
should have been solved at design stage itself.<br />
• The truck load<strong>in</strong>g control room is on the first floor requir<strong>in</strong>g truck drivers to<br />
come up and supervisors to go down often. The wait<strong>in</strong>g space on the first floor<br />
is also limited. The air condition<strong>in</strong>g requirement on the first floor is more. The<br />
view to the truck top from the first floor is obstructed s<strong>in</strong>ce the truck load<strong>in</strong>g<br />
244
gantry roof and other construction comes <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>e of sight. The view of the<br />
personnel on truck top is better from the ground floor. Hence locat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
control room <strong>in</strong> first floor does not help much.<br />
• The layout of the control room is such that the officers work<strong>in</strong>g there have to<br />
be constantly move around from one end of the room to the other result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
higher transaction time, fatigue and confusion. This could have been reduced<br />
bybetter facility design tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the operations <strong>in</strong>volved.<br />
The possibility of a new separate entrance for truck load<strong>in</strong>g is to be<br />
probed. This new entrance could be made, break<strong>in</strong>g the wall opposite the present<br />
truck park<strong>in</strong>g area. At present the number of trucks loaded every hour changes<br />
very much with time. If this is due to the non-availability of trucks that have<br />
come for load<strong>in</strong>g it is understandable, but this is not the case here. This uneven<br />
pattern is the result of the complex <strong>in</strong>teraction of IOC issu<strong>in</strong>g the load<strong>in</strong>g memo,<br />
security regulat<strong>in</strong>g the traffic and truck entry to KRL, familiarity of the drivers<br />
and helpers with the new truck load<strong>in</strong>g system, and the work<strong>in</strong>g pattern of<br />
personnel and officers at Truck load<strong>in</strong>g. Efforts have to be taken to have a more<br />
regular product load<strong>in</strong>g and dispatch pattern <strong>in</strong> place. Work-study will be helpful<br />
<strong>in</strong>identify<strong>in</strong>gthe bottleneck operation <strong>in</strong>volved here. The shift change over times<br />
can also be reduced with the new system. An attempt has been made to compare<br />
the handl<strong>in</strong>g loss figures or the periods previous to <strong>in</strong>stallation of mass flow<br />
meters and post <strong>in</strong>stallation to f<strong>in</strong>d if handl<strong>in</strong>g losses had reduced because of<br />
better measurement by mass flow meters. However, the comparison gave no<br />
conclusive evidence. This is believed to be so because of the lack of correctness of<br />
the reported figures.<br />
6.3.4.7 Pipel<strong>in</strong>e transfers<br />
Products such as LPG, MS, SKO, HSD, Naphtha, LSHS, FO and LDO are<br />
transferred to HOC and the depots of the OMCs by pipel<strong>in</strong>e. The volume of<br />
productstransferred by pipel<strong>in</strong>e is about one fourth of the total dispatch. In order<br />
to understand the product dispatch pattern. The product-wise monthly dispatch<br />
graphspresented below, for the year 1998-99 shall be looked <strong>in</strong>to next.<br />
245
tankers it was seen that R N Tagore, Iswari, Sravanan, BC Chattergi, and S Sarma<br />
are relatively more expensive and hence they should be avoided. A peculiar th<strong>in</strong>g<br />
noticedwas that all foreign crude tankers had lower than average discharge rates,<br />
this should be looked <strong>in</strong>to. Other SCI vessels with low discharge rates should also<br />
be avoided. The simulation experiments of crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations show that<br />
the cost of unload<strong>in</strong>g operations goes up l<strong>in</strong>early if more than sixteen tankers<br />
br<strong>in</strong>g crude every month.<br />
Crude tank <strong>in</strong>spection and repair takes a very long time lead<strong>in</strong>g to loss of<br />
tankage. The loss of tankage on this count is from one third to one fourth the total<br />
built up tankage. This will have to be reduced to improve tankage availability.<br />
The arrival of crude was such <strong>in</strong> most months, that one type of crude was there <strong>in</strong><br />
veryhigh quantity at a given time. A comfortable stock of BH, PG-HS and PG-LS<br />
crude was not steadily available throughout most months, limit<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
flexibility. The crude stock build up for monsoon was done too early, the months<br />
of March, April and Mayshould be used for it.<br />
It was found that ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is the strong po<strong>in</strong>t of KRL. Production and<br />
dispatch of most products are well aligned therefore <strong>in</strong>ventory build-up was not<br />
very high (this could be because KRL is forced to align production and dispatch<br />
because of low product storage facility available). The product tankage<br />
requirements for KRL are not sufficient for most products this is most critical for<br />
HSD. There is automatic tank gaug<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> place, now that was be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
utilized to a great extent. However, procedures many a time requires manual<br />
gaug<strong>in</strong>g to be still done, this should be reduced and manual gaug<strong>in</strong>g should only<br />
be done for calibration and accuracy check<strong>in</strong>g of tank gauges periodically. It was<br />
seen that wherever manual blend<strong>in</strong>g was done as <strong>in</strong> KRL only a few regular<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g options were tried out. This limits the ga<strong>in</strong> that could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g operations. Manual blend<strong>in</strong>g offl<strong>in</strong>e also requires more tankage for<br />
storage. The plan of KRL to go for on l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g systems is a good step <strong>in</strong><br />
overcom<strong>in</strong>gthis problem.<br />
Product dispatch by tankers is crucial for KRL, late tanker arrivals will<br />
result <strong>in</strong> ullage problems, and forced reduction of ref<strong>in</strong>ery throughput. Hence<br />
KRL should more closely monitor product movement by tanker. A system of<br />
249
shar<strong>in</strong>g data regard<strong>in</strong>g product tank positions between OMCs and KRL can go a<br />
long way <strong>in</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g KRL to lessen the problems it has due to limited product<br />
tankage.<br />
The operations at wagon load<strong>in</strong>g need to be improved. With some<br />
streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g done the amount of products dispatched by this route can be<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased. The problem <strong>in</strong> this area are ma<strong>in</strong>ly Human Resource related. There is<br />
also the problem of bad wagons com<strong>in</strong>g for load<strong>in</strong>g that has to be sorted with the<br />
railwaysand a solution to the same found.<br />
The new truck load<strong>in</strong>g facility is currently underutilized because of process<br />
bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> the procedures before and after load<strong>in</strong>g. This has to be studied <strong>in</strong><br />
detail and measures to remove the bottlenecks found and implemented.<br />
The account<strong>in</strong>g departments face problems because they have to rely on<br />
figures of stock and sales reported by Stock and Oil Movement and Computer and<br />
Automation departments. These figures are often <strong>in</strong>consistent and require<br />
modification later. The need to re-key this data <strong>in</strong> different computers because of<br />
lack of an <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation system is a serious problem here. With changes<br />
tak<strong>in</strong>g place so fast people need to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> areas such as International<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ance, Oil market operations and shipp<strong>in</strong>g and related rules to handle problems<br />
<strong>in</strong> these areas effectively.<br />
250
7.1 Introduction<br />
CH A PT ER VII<br />
Summary, Conclusion, and<br />
Scope for Further Work<br />
Objective of the research was to make a detailed study of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
management problems for a typical <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Methodology used for the<br />
study was splitt<strong>in</strong>g the problem <strong>in</strong> to small modules of structured, semi<br />
structured, and unstructured parts and then f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g suitable solutions for the<br />
problem. All those solutions were implemented together with suitable l<strong>in</strong>kages to<br />
get the f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>tegrated supply cha<strong>in</strong> for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The methodology was suitable<br />
for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the solutions and it was established by the application to an exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Logistics of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is a complicated subsystem <strong>in</strong> its supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
This was studied <strong>in</strong> detail. The study was started at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of Government<br />
decontrol of petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry. Complete decontrol is not yet over. So its impact<br />
is not yet completely clear to the <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
7.2 Summary<br />
Exist<strong>in</strong>g literature on SCM related to the present work was reviewed and is<br />
given <strong>in</strong> chapter two. It revealed the scope for SCM application for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Though many works had been carried out, an <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach was not found.<br />
Efficiency of SCM is on the <strong>in</strong>tegration of supply cha<strong>in</strong> operations. Present work<br />
is <strong>in</strong> the direction of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g all the operations us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.<br />
As per the literature, location is the most important factor for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery logistics.<br />
To identify a location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the knowledge on the petroleum ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g,<br />
quantity of crude oil available, transportation of crude oil, trade practices, place<br />
of availability of crude oil, place of consumption of crude oil and products, mode<br />
of transportation, pric<strong>in</strong>g mechanism, and methods of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g are essential. So<br />
the relevant practices and data were presented <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of chapter three.<br />
This gives an <strong>in</strong>sight to the supply cha<strong>in</strong> practices of petroleum ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
251
The data presented reveals the potential for further addition of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity.<br />
For add<strong>in</strong>g capacity the first step is identification of location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. With<br />
that knowledge <strong>in</strong> trade practices, some locations could be identified all over the<br />
world for sett<strong>in</strong>g up a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The procedure for selection of location is given<br />
below. A method for select<strong>in</strong>g location for a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery was identified. All the<br />
locations identified were analysed for the suitability us<strong>in</strong>g a pass/fail criteria. At<br />
this stage, places which are evidently unsuitable were elim<strong>in</strong>ated. Then the<br />
logistic cost for each location was calculated for elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g with very high<br />
logistic cost. Then factors for selection of location were identified. A weightage<br />
table was developed for reduc<strong>in</strong>g the number of factors. Those selected factors<br />
were compared each other and relative score was awarded. Then a preference<br />
matrix was developed to f<strong>in</strong>d out weightages for each factor. Those weightages<br />
were used to compare the locations short listed. From the comparison a weighted<br />
score for each location was calculated and location with highest score was<br />
selected for start<strong>in</strong>g a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Once location is f<strong>in</strong>alized, flexibility and<br />
configuration plays important role <strong>in</strong> the performance of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Flexibility<br />
is important because demand pattern changes among products, new products,<br />
etc. Areas that require flexibility were identified and the importance of each area<br />
was discussed. This is used while sett<strong>in</strong>g up a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery because flexibility<br />
gives more freedom <strong>in</strong> product pattern and product specifications. Product<br />
specification could be made flexible only through proper selection of technology.<br />
So the technologies available were analyzed along with their relative cost. A<br />
decision on location of ref<strong>in</strong>ery, flexibly required, and technology needed to give<br />
the required flexibilitycan f<strong>in</strong>alize the design of a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Major problem <strong>in</strong><br />
an exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ery is related to plann<strong>in</strong>g. Next section discusses logistic<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g required for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Logisticproblem was divided <strong>in</strong> to two stages namely design and plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Areas, which can not be improved after <strong>in</strong>stallation, are design stage problems.<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g is done for both facility design and operation. For improv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
effectiveness of plann<strong>in</strong>g, it was aga<strong>in</strong> sub-classified <strong>in</strong> to annual plan, roll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
plan, and daily plan. Decisions to be taken at each level were identified <strong>in</strong> the<br />
252
plan zone with respect to <strong>in</strong>bound logistics, <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics, and outbound<br />
logistics. A hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g model was developed for giv<strong>in</strong>g a clear picture<br />
of decisions to be taken at each stage. This will also give an idea about the source<br />
of <strong>in</strong>put data for plann<strong>in</strong>g. Source of <strong>in</strong>formation can be either from previous<br />
plan period or from outside the plann<strong>in</strong>g system. Model developed was helpful <strong>in</strong><br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the sequence <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g. Tools required for plann<strong>in</strong>g at each stage<br />
were identified and separated <strong>in</strong> to annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, short term plann<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />
daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. These were given <strong>in</strong> table form for the easy reference. Demand<br />
forecast<strong>in</strong>g was the first stage <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g. Demand for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products was not<br />
the same every month. It was chang<strong>in</strong>g with seasons and socio-economic<br />
conditions. So a model was developed to make the forecast<strong>in</strong>g better and more<br />
reliable. In the model, consumption of products <strong>in</strong> the previous years was taken<br />
as the <strong>in</strong>put data. A six-step mode of demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g was developed for the<br />
implementation <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>gof forecast with all plann<strong>in</strong>g areas of supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> was essential for better plann<strong>in</strong>g. This six-step approach was help<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
achiev<strong>in</strong>g it. Crude selection and purchase was another important function <strong>in</strong> a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Crude selection was made on the basis of product demand and facility<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> and outside the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Due to the l<strong>in</strong>ear nature of the problem a<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g Problem was formulated to solve the problem. Maximiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
netback is the objective function. Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery will have different set of<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts. An example of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited (KRL) was taken for verify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the application and ga<strong>in</strong> of the models. Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude oil to the ref<strong>in</strong>ery was the<br />
next important function. This function had a number of variables like tide <strong>in</strong> the<br />
port, seasons, etc. A simulation model was developed for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />
model gives the number of ships to be brought and their cost for br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude<br />
oil. This model was used as DSS for ship selection with m<strong>in</strong>imum demurrage<br />
payment to the shipp<strong>in</strong>g company. Internal logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure was also<br />
discussed <strong>in</strong> this section to reduce starv<strong>in</strong>g and block<strong>in</strong>g of facilities <strong>in</strong> the<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the facilities were tightly coupled so the freedom for<br />
flexibility was limited for logistic purposes. Modes of transport for product <strong>in</strong><br />
outbound logistics were also analyzed and a model was developed for select<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
mode of transport to a particular place for def<strong>in</strong>ite quantity and variety of<br />
253
products. These models will help <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g systematic plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound logistics. Exponential smooth<strong>in</strong>g method used<br />
for calculat<strong>in</strong>g demand was found very appropriate and six-step method of<br />
demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g was useful for the <strong>in</strong>dustry. LPP used for crude oil selection<br />
was also found to be very useful for a stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Simulation model<br />
used for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g can be used as DSS. Allthese together make the <strong>in</strong>bound<br />
logistic activity of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery very strong. Application of <strong>in</strong>formation technology<br />
<strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery for the performance improvement <strong>in</strong> SCM is discussed <strong>in</strong> the next<br />
section.<br />
In a supply cha<strong>in</strong> management system there are three key components.<br />
They are <strong>in</strong>formation flow, material flow, and cash flow. Success of SCM is the<br />
systematic control of all these flows. Standard methods are there for improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
material flow. Better technologies are there for faster <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
use. Effective bank<strong>in</strong>g systems are there for faster transactions. But better<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g and control is required to reap the benefits of SCM systems. Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and control functions performed by logistic managers rely on quick and accurate<br />
relevant data. Build<strong>in</strong>g an Information System for data capture, storage, and use<br />
is the pre requisite of a good modern <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> System.<br />
Information technology is the backbone of <strong>in</strong>tegration of <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Information shar<strong>in</strong>g can improve the productivity and reduce level of <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />
at all stages. An efficient software system is required to support a well-designed<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> management system. The software system must have a very good<br />
data collection facility from the source of data as much as possible. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
data entry is the next stage if direct collection is not possible. Software system<br />
model must support all the functions <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The ma<strong>in</strong> functions <strong>in</strong> a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery are process control and monitor<strong>in</strong>g, operations management, and<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess management. Identified key features of software system must be there<br />
<strong>in</strong> the software to be f<strong>in</strong>alized. The strength and utility of any software system is<br />
the <strong>in</strong>tegration of all functions <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In other words dispens<strong>in</strong>g retail<br />
outlet to crude oil and chemical suppliers must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated through<br />
communication systems to improve the quality of service and reduce the work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
254
capital requirement. This will improve the profitability and competitiveness of a<br />
ref<strong>in</strong>ery. All the processes were subdivided <strong>in</strong> to small subgroups and<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation required and generated was analyzed. All those sub groups were<br />
jo<strong>in</strong>ed together to form an <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation flow model. This will provide<br />
reliable and fast <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g as well as for operations.<br />
Software available <strong>in</strong> the market was analyzed and a comparative study was<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded for tak<strong>in</strong>g a decision on selection of <strong>in</strong>formation system if a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is<br />
<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> buy<strong>in</strong>g one. All those tools developed and selected were used <strong>in</strong> a<br />
stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Results of the applications are given <strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />
All the logistics operations performed by Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited were<br />
analyzed and suggestions were given for improvement. It was started with the<br />
selection of crude oil and f<strong>in</strong>ished with the retailer out let. It was proved beyond<br />
doubt that crude handl<strong>in</strong>g operations, especially the limited crude pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
capacity was the most serious bottleneck at KRL. Four temporary solutions were<br />
suggested (i) use of drag reducers (ii) gett<strong>in</strong>g Suez-max tankers to br<strong>in</strong>g crude<br />
(iii) us<strong>in</strong>g the black oil pipel<strong>in</strong>e available to pump <strong>in</strong> crude when it is not <strong>in</strong> use<br />
for product movement. (iv) Install a booster pump <strong>in</strong> the crude l<strong>in</strong>e at the pit<br />
head at the KRL tank farm. This will boost pressures from there and will take up<br />
the pressure needed to pump the crude <strong>in</strong>to the tanks. The permanent solution to<br />
this problem is the S<strong>in</strong>gle Po<strong>in</strong>t Moor<strong>in</strong>g system that KRL is currently exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />
From the past freight data for crude tankers it could be seen that R N Tagore,<br />
Iswari, Sravanan, BC Chattergi, and S Sarma were relatively more expensive<br />
ships and hence they should be avoided. A peculiar th<strong>in</strong>g noticed was that all<br />
foreign crude tankers had lower than average discharge rates, and this should be<br />
looked <strong>in</strong>to. Other SCI vessels with low discharge rates should also be avoided.<br />
The simulation experiments of crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations show that the cost of<br />
unload<strong>in</strong>g operations goes up l<strong>in</strong>early if more than sixteen tankers br<strong>in</strong>g crude<br />
every month. Crude tank <strong>in</strong>spection and repair takes a very long time lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
loss of tankage. The loss of tankage on this account was from one third to one<br />
fourth of the total built up tankage. This have to be reduced to improve tankage<br />
availability. The arrival of crude was vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> most months, that one type of<br />
255
crude was there <strong>in</strong> very high quantity at a given time. A comfortable stock of BH,<br />
PG-HS and PG-LS crude was not steadily available throughout most of the<br />
months, limit<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>in</strong>g flexibility. The crude stock build up for monsoon was<br />
done too early, <strong>in</strong> the months of March, April and May. It was found that ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
was the strong po<strong>in</strong>t of KRL. The production and dispatch of most products were<br />
wellaligned that <strong>in</strong>ventory build-up was not very high (this could be because KRL<br />
was forced to align production and dispatch because of low product storage<br />
facility available). The product tankage requirements for KRL were not sufficient<br />
for most products. This was most critical for HSD. There was automatic tank<br />
gaug<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> place, which was be<strong>in</strong>g utilized to a great extent. However,<br />
procedures many a time requires manual gaug<strong>in</strong>g to be still done, this should be<br />
reduced and manual gaug<strong>in</strong>g should only be done for calibration and accuracy<br />
check<strong>in</strong>g of tank gauges periodically. It was known that wherever manual<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g was done as <strong>in</strong> KRL only a few regular blend<strong>in</strong>g options were tried out.<br />
This limits the ga<strong>in</strong> that could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from blend<strong>in</strong>g operations. Manual<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g offl<strong>in</strong>e also requires more tankage for storage. KRL must go for on l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> overcom<strong>in</strong>gthis problem.<br />
Product dispatch by tankers is crucial for KRL, late tanker arrivals result<br />
<strong>in</strong> ullage problems, and forced reduction of ref<strong>in</strong>ery throughput. Hence KRL<br />
should more closely monitor product movement by tanker. A system of shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
data regard<strong>in</strong>g product tank positions between oil market<strong>in</strong>g companies and KRL<br />
can go a long way <strong>in</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g KRL to lessen the problems it has due to limited<br />
product tankage. The operations at wagon load<strong>in</strong>g need to be improved. With<br />
some streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, the amount of products dispatched by this route can be<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased. The problem <strong>in</strong> this area will be ma<strong>in</strong>ly HR. There is also the problem<br />
of bad wagons com<strong>in</strong>g for load<strong>in</strong>g that has to be sorted with the railways and a<br />
solution to the same must be found out. The new truck load<strong>in</strong>g facility is<br />
currently underutilized because of process bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> the procedures before<br />
and after load<strong>in</strong>g. This has to be studied <strong>in</strong> detail and measures to remove the<br />
bottlenecks must be found and implemented. The account<strong>in</strong>g department faces<br />
problems because they have to rely on figures of stock and sales reported by Stock<br />
256
and Oil Movement, and Computer and Automation departments. These figures<br />
are often <strong>in</strong>consistent and require modification later. The need to re-key this data<br />
<strong>in</strong> different computers because of lack of an <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation system, is a<br />
serious problem here. With changes tak<strong>in</strong>g place so fast people need to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>in</strong> areas such as <strong>in</strong>ternational f<strong>in</strong>ance, Oil market operations, and shipp<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
related rules, to handle problems <strong>in</strong> these areas effectively.<br />
7.3 Limitations of the Work<br />
Data collection for the case study was ma<strong>in</strong>ly done <strong>in</strong> the time of<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism scenario. Changes can be expected <strong>in</strong> post<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism scenario. This will change the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
system. Distillation process is automated <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery under study. So<br />
optimization of distillation is not attempted. In the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, blend<strong>in</strong>g of products<br />
is done <strong>in</strong> the storage tank. Onl<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g at the time of product delivery is<br />
suggested for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g product flexibility. In blend<strong>in</strong>g a lot of research had been<br />
carried out and standard practices are evolved. So no attempt is made to optimize<br />
blend<strong>in</strong>g process. Method for solution to the location problem is derived through<br />
a sequence of calculations. The whole problem can be solved us<strong>in</strong>g a computer<br />
programme and it can be converted to a Decision Support System. It is not tried<br />
<strong>in</strong> this research. Flexibility for ref<strong>in</strong>ery is solved as sub-systems of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
Even though it is possible to quantify flexibility, it is not attempted <strong>in</strong> this<br />
research work and is one of the limitations of this work. Attempt to make it an<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated solution was also not done. Technologyoptions for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are taken<br />
from the published literature only. A detailed survey of technology may give a<br />
better result and the cost for adopt<strong>in</strong>g technology also will be more realistic.<br />
Crude oil selection problem was solved by us<strong>in</strong>g data from a stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />
The ref<strong>in</strong>ery was not permitt<strong>in</strong>g to publish the actual data so realistic data is used<br />
to solve the problem. Multiple ref<strong>in</strong>eries also can be studied for formulat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
problem. In the simulation problem discrete arrival of ships were considered but<br />
<strong>in</strong> real life there can be cluster of ship arrival. Seasonality factors like monsoon<br />
are not considered <strong>in</strong> the simulation problem. <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> operations related<br />
257
studies have been related to a s<strong>in</strong>gle ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Market<strong>in</strong>g and distribution<br />
networks have not been studied.<br />
7.4 Conclusions of the Study<br />
Location of ref<strong>in</strong>ery has great importance <strong>in</strong> the SCM problem. Selection<br />
of location must consider many factors. So a model was developed for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out<br />
the suitability of location with respect to a few other similar locations. This model<br />
will help <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>aliz<strong>in</strong>g the decision on location. Flexibility must be maximum to<br />
compete <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational market. Areas which require flexibility were<br />
identified and methods for provid<strong>in</strong>g flexibility were suggested to compete <strong>in</strong> the<br />
post APM scenario. Process selection was identified as one of the important<br />
factors <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up of a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Selection procedure and options available<br />
for selection as well as suitability of each process <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Indian</strong> context were also<br />
discussed.<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g was divided <strong>in</strong> to four time periods for improv<strong>in</strong>g the efficiency<br />
of plann<strong>in</strong>g. Plann<strong>in</strong>g started with the forecast of demand for products. A<br />
mathematical model was developed to improve the accuracy of forecast<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Product demand has bear<strong>in</strong>g on selection of crude oil and crude oil selection is<br />
based on many factors. So an LPP was developed for select<strong>in</strong>g crude oil so as to<br />
maximize netbacks. Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude oil to the port of unload<strong>in</strong>g is the next major<br />
bottleneck. A simulation based DSS was developed for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g. The DSS<br />
will provide comparison of different ship schedules. Separate plann<strong>in</strong>g models<br />
for <strong>in</strong>bound logistic, <strong>in</strong>ternal logistic, and external logistics are also developed.<br />
Information technology be<strong>in</strong>g the backbone of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management,<br />
tools available for use <strong>in</strong> SCM as well as the suitability of each tool was discussed.<br />
An <strong>in</strong>formation system model for <strong>in</strong>tegrated ref<strong>in</strong>ery supply cha<strong>in</strong> management<br />
was presented. The whole system was divided <strong>in</strong> to small operational sub<br />
modules and <strong>in</strong>formation system for each sub module was developed. F<strong>in</strong>ally all<br />
the sub modules were jo<strong>in</strong>ed together to get the <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation model for<br />
258
SCM. A stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>ery was selected for collect<strong>in</strong>g data for analyz<strong>in</strong>g each<br />
proposed model. A SWOT analysis was done <strong>in</strong> KRL to identify the strengths,<br />
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for KRL. Important weaknesses were<br />
analyzed <strong>in</strong> detail. Inbound logistics and outbound logistics were found as week<br />
areas and suggestions for improvements were given. Information flow and cash<br />
flow were analyzed and some suggestions were given <strong>in</strong> this thesis. Results of<br />
analysis was very encourag<strong>in</strong>g and suggestions for improvement of operations of<br />
the ref<strong>in</strong>ery is also added <strong>in</strong> this research.<br />
7.5 Scope for Further Work<br />
The study was conducted <strong>in</strong> the time of APM dismantl<strong>in</strong>g. APM<br />
dismantl<strong>in</strong>g could not cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> the pace at which it was designed. So the full<br />
effect could not be taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> this study. When the APM is completely<br />
removed, similar study can be done <strong>in</strong> the future. Export possibility for products<br />
can be analyzed <strong>in</strong> detail after full APM dismantl<strong>in</strong>g. Development of software<br />
package can be made for the <strong>in</strong>tegrated model on SCM and it could be developed<br />
as a commercial package, which will be of great use to the petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong><br />
future for better performance. Scope of strategic supply cha<strong>in</strong> partnerships<br />
between crude oil suppliers, ref<strong>in</strong>ers, and marketers can all be studied s<strong>in</strong>ce they<br />
are possible <strong>in</strong> future. Exclusive studies related to possibilities and profits from<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> partnerships and profit shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such partnerships are very<br />
relevant. Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g type of study to improve supply cha<strong>in</strong> performance can<br />
also be done.<br />
259
References<br />
1. Agost<strong>in</strong>o Villa, 2001, Introduc<strong>in</strong>g Some <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Problems.<br />
International Journal of Production Economics, 73.<br />
2. Amundson S., 1998, Relationship Between Theory-Driven Empirical<br />
Research In Operations <strong>Management</strong> And Other Discipl<strong>in</strong>e. Journal of<br />
Operations <strong>Management</strong>, 16.<br />
3. Andrew Campbell, Maxcus Alexander, 1997, What Is Wrong With Strategy.<br />
Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, (November-December).<br />
4. Apple J.M., 1977, Plant Layout and Material Handl<strong>in</strong>g. John WHey & Sons,<br />
NewYork.<br />
5. Av<strong>in</strong> Y.A, Federgrues, 1998, The Operational Benefits Of Information<br />
Shar<strong>in</strong>g And Vendor Managed Inventory By Program. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />
University.<br />
6. Back W. Edward, Laneford C. Bell,1996, Re-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Materials<br />
<strong>Management</strong>: Opportunities For Electronics Technology Implementation.<br />
Cost Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 38(2).<br />
7. Baker Y, S.A. Lippman, 1984, Technological Expectations AndAdoption Of<br />
Improve Technology. Journal of Economic Theory, 34.<br />
8. Ball<strong>in</strong>tg<strong>in</strong> K., 1993, Optimization In Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Schedul<strong>in</strong>g: Model<strong>in</strong>g And<br />
Solution. Optimization <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, 3, John WHey, New York.<br />
9. Barker K.R., 1974,Introduction ofSequenc<strong>in</strong>g and Schedul<strong>in</strong>g, John WHey,<br />
NewYork.<br />
10. Barney J.B., 1991, Firm ResourcesAnd Susta<strong>in</strong>ed Competitive Advantage.<br />
Journal of <strong>Management</strong>, 17(1).<br />
11. Beaman B.M., 1999, Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Performance. International<br />
Journal Of Operations and Production <strong>Management</strong>, 19(3).<br />
12. Bechtel, 1993, PIMS (Process Industry Model<strong>in</strong>g System). Users Manual<br />
260
Version, Housfon, TX Bechtel Corporation.<br />
13. Beckman M., 1968, Location Theory. Random house, New York.<br />
14. Beigel, 1974, Production control,A Quantitative Approach. Prentice Hall of<br />
India, Delhi.<br />
15. Bell E.L, and Stuckhart G., 1998, Attributes Of Material <strong>Management</strong><br />
System. Journal of Construction Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>Management</strong>, 112(1)<br />
16. Beth Schwartz., 2000. If You Th<strong>in</strong>k Gas Prices Are Bad, You Should See<br />
The Marg<strong>in</strong>s. Transportation and Distribution, 41(8).<br />
17. Bhasi M., Acharya D., 1997, Optimisation Of Large Mix For Ship<br />
Lighter<strong>in</strong>g Operations. Bulk Solids Handl<strong>in</strong>g, 17(2).<br />
18. Bhattacharya P., 1998, Clear<strong>in</strong>g The <strong>Supply</strong> Bottleneck. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess world,<br />
November-December.<br />
19. Blois KJ., 1980, The Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Orientations and Its Information<br />
Needs. European Journal of Market<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
20. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton C.E., Shobrys D.E., 1996, Optimize the <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>.<br />
Hydrocarbon process<strong>in</strong>g, 75(9).<br />
21. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton C.E., 1992, Inventory <strong>Management</strong> <strong>in</strong> Blend<strong>in</strong>g Optimization,<br />
Use Of Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear Optimization For Gasol<strong>in</strong>e Blend Plann<strong>in</strong>g And<br />
Schedul<strong>in</strong>g. In ORSA/TIMS Natural Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Sanfranscisco (CA).<br />
22. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton C.E., 1995, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Schedul<strong>in</strong>g and Control Integration <strong>in</strong> the<br />
ProcessIndustries. MC Graw thill, New york.<br />
23. Boulden James B., 1975, Computer-Assisted Plann<strong>in</strong>g System. Mc Graw<br />
Hill, New York.<br />
24. Bour Land K, S. Powell, D. Pyke., 1996, Exploit<strong>in</strong>g Timely Demand<br />
Information to Reduce Inventories. European Journal of Operations<br />
Research, 92.<br />
25. Bowersox D.J, Daugherty P.J., 1995, Logistics Paradigm: The Impact of<br />
Information Technology. Journal of bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 16(1).<br />
26. Bowersox D.J., 1997, Integrated <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>: A Strategic<br />
Imperative. In proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of Logistics management 1997<br />
261
annual conference, Chicago, IL, 5-8.<br />
27· Bowersox D.J., 1997, Lessons Learned from World Class Leaders. <strong>Supply</strong><br />
<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Review, 1(1).<br />
28. Box G.E.P., Jank<strong>in</strong>s G.M., 1976, Time Series Analysis, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
Control. Golden-day, San Franscisco.<br />
29. Brately P, Fex RL., schrage., 1987, A Guide to Simulation, 2 nd Edition,<br />
Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-verlag, NewYork.<br />
30. Bridleman., 1997, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Make- To-Order World.<br />
Apics-The performance advantage, March.<br />
31. Broniarczyk S.M., J.W, Alba, 1994, The Role ofConsumers Institutions <strong>in</strong><br />
Interface Mak<strong>in</strong>g. Journal of Consumer Research, 21.<br />
32. Burbidge J.L., 1984, Automated Production Control with a Simulation<br />
Capability. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs oflFIP conference, WG 5-7, Copen Lage.<br />
33. Burges Rachel.,1998, Avoid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> failure: Lesson<br />
from Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Process Re-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. International Journal of Logistic<br />
<strong>Management</strong>, 9(2).<br />
34. Butfa KS, Sav<strong>in</strong> RK., 1993,Modern Production/Operations <strong>Management</strong>.<br />
John WHey and Sons, NewYork.<br />
35. C.Zipk<strong>in</strong>, 1999. Competitive and Co-Operative Inventory Policies <strong>in</strong> Three<br />
Stage <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>. <strong>Management</strong> Science,January.<br />
36. Cachon G., M. Fisher, 2000, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Inventory <strong>Management</strong> And<br />
The Value OfShared Information. <strong>Management</strong> of Science, 46.<br />
37. Carter J.R, Narasimhan R, 1996, Is Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Really Strategic?<br />
International Journal of Purchas<strong>in</strong>g and materials <strong>Management</strong>, 32.<br />
38. Cav<strong>in</strong>ato J.L.,1999, Total Cost Volume Model for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
Competitiveness. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess logistics, 13(2).<br />
39. Chambers J.E, S.K. Mullick, D.D. Smith, 1974, An Executives Guide to<br />
Forecast<strong>in</strong>g. John WHey, NewYork.<br />
40. Chan Y.K, Huff S.C., 1998, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Strategies Orientation, Information<br />
System Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment.<br />
262
Information System Research, 8.<br />
41. Chen F, Dregner Z, Ryan J.K, Simchi-Levi D., 2000, Quantify<strong>in</strong>g The<br />
Bullwhip Effect <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>, The Impact ofRorecast<strong>in</strong>gs, Lead Time,<br />
and Information <strong>Management</strong>. <strong>Management</strong> Science, 46(3).<br />
42. Chen F., 1998, Echelon Reorder Po<strong>in</strong>t, Installation Reorder Po<strong>in</strong>tt.<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Science, 44.<br />
43. Chow G., Heaver T.D, Henriksson L.E., 1995, Strategy, Structure, and<br />
Performance: A Framework for Logistics Research. The logistics and<br />
Transportation Review.gifa),<br />
44. Christy D.P., H.J. Waston., 1983, The Application OfSimulation: A Survey<br />
OfIndustrial Practices. Interfaces.ig (5).<br />
45. Clark Wallace., 1992, The Gantt Chart, a Work<strong>in</strong>g Tool of<strong>Management</strong>.<br />
Ronald Press, New York.<br />
46. Cochan G., M. Fisher, 2002, SC Inventory <strong>Management</strong> And The Value Of<br />
Shared Information. <strong>Management</strong> Science, 42(6).<br />
47. Cochon G.P, Fisher M., 2000, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Inventory <strong>Management</strong> And<br />
The Value OfShared Information. <strong>Management</strong> Science, 40(8).<br />
48. Cooper M.C, Eliram L.M., 1993, Characteristics of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> and Implication for Purchas<strong>in</strong>g and Logistics Strategy.<br />
International Journal of Logistic <strong>Management</strong>, 4(2).<br />
49. Cooper M.C., lambert D.M., Paugh J.D., 1997, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>,<br />
More Than A New Ma<strong>in</strong> To Logistics. International Journal of Logistic<br />
<strong>Management</strong>, 8(1).<br />
50. Cox J., Adam F., 1980, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g An Integrated<br />
DSS. Simulation, (September).<br />
51. Cox Jt. T., 1989, Toward the Measurement ofManufactur<strong>in</strong>g Flexibility.<br />
Productions and <strong>in</strong>ventory management Journal, 2.<br />
52. Crawlord J.L, S<strong>in</strong>dair G.B., 1997, Computer Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Of Beer Tanker<br />
Deliveries. International Journal of Physical Distribution, 7(5).<br />
53. Davis Otto A, Frederick H. Rurter., 1973, A Simulation Of Municipal<br />
263
Zon<strong>in</strong>g Decisions. <strong>Management</strong> Science, 19(4).<br />
54. De Toni A, Tonchia A, 1998, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Flexibility, A Literature<br />
Review. International Journal of Production Research, 36.<br />
55. Decter Schneiz AR., 1997, Apply<strong>in</strong>g Team To Logistic Processes:<br />
Information Acquisition And The Impact Of Term Role Clarity And<br />
Norms. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 18(1).<br />
56. Devenport .H., Short J.E., 1990, The New Industrial Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Information Technology and Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Process Redesign. Sloan<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Review, 31<br />
57. Dewitt C.W, Lasdon L.S, Waren AD, Brenner D.A, Melhem S.A., 1989,<br />
OMEGA: An improved gasol<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g systemfor Texaco. Interfaces, 19.<br />
58. Dieasli R., 1984, Functional Integration Is The Key To The Factory OfThe<br />
Future. Industrial Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, (September).<br />
59. Drezner Z., 1995, Facility Location - A survey ofApplication & Methods.<br />
Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, Berl<strong>in</strong>.<br />
60. Eiichi Tamguchi, Michihiko Noritake, Tadashs yamada, Fo ru Iznmifaus,<br />
1999, Optimal Size and Location, Plann<strong>in</strong>g ofPublic Logistic Term<strong>in</strong>als.<br />
Transportation research Part E, 35.<br />
61. Eisenhurdt K., 1989, Build<strong>in</strong>g Theories From Case Study Research.<br />
Academy of management review, 14(4), 532 - 550.<br />
62. Eliram L.M, Cooper M.C., 1990, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Partnership<br />
and the Shipper - Third Party Relationship. International Journal of<br />
Logistics <strong>Management</strong>, 1(2).<br />
63. Elizondo C., 1996, Network<strong>in</strong>g Your Firms Knowledge. Chemical<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, (April).<br />
64. Eric P. Jack, Amitabh Raturi, 2002, Sources of Volume Flexibility and<br />
Their Impact on Performance. Journal of Operations <strong>Management</strong>, 20.<br />
65. Eric P. Tack, Amitabh Ratur., 2002, Sources of Volume Flexibility and<br />
Their Impact on Performance. Journal of operations management, 20(5),<br />
519-548.<br />
264
66. Evans G.N., Na<strong>in</strong> M.M, Towill D.R., 1993, Assess<strong>in</strong>g the Impact of<br />
Information Systems on the Dynamics of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Performance.<br />
Logistics<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>Management</strong>. 6(25)<br />
67. Federgruen A, P. Zipk<strong>in</strong>, 1986, An Inventory Model With Limited<br />
Production Capacity and <strong>in</strong> Certa<strong>in</strong> Demands. Mathematics Operations<br />
Research, 11(2).<br />
68. Feitz<strong>in</strong>ger K, H.K. Lee, 1997, Mass Customization at Hewlett Packard The<br />
Power ofPostponement. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review 75(1).<br />
69. Fiegembanm A, Karnani A, 1991, Output Flexibility - A Competitive<br />
Advantage For Small Firms. Strategic <strong>Management</strong> of Journal, 12.<br />
70. Firth M., 1977, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Methods <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Management</strong>. Edward<br />
Arnold, London.<br />
71. Fisher M., 1997, What is the Right SCfor Your Product. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
Review 75(2)<br />
72. Fisher, Marshall L., 1997, What is Right <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>for Your Customer.<br />
Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, Mar-April, 1997.<br />
73. Ha<strong>in</strong>eken, 1997The <strong>in</strong>ternet, Forbes ,March 24, 58.<br />
74. Fordows, Kasra. 1997. Mak<strong>in</strong>g the Most of Forgive Factories Fortune.<br />
Mar-April.<br />
75. Foster RA, Ryan D.M., 1976, An Integer Programm<strong>in</strong>g Approach to the<br />
Vehicle Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Problem, Operation Research Quarterly, 27.<br />
76. Fourre James P., 1970, Quantitative Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Plann<strong>in</strong>g Technique.<br />
American <strong>Management</strong> Association INC, NewYork.<br />
77. Francis R.L, J.A White., 1974, Facility Layout and Location, AnAnalytical<br />
Approach. Prentice Hall Inc: Englewood- cliffs.<br />
78. Fredrickson J.W., 1986, The Strategic Decision Process and<br />
Organizational Structure, Academyof management Review, 11(2).<br />
79. Gallorna J.L., Norman H., and Day A., 1991, Pathway to Customers,<br />
Reduc<strong>in</strong>g Complexity <strong>in</strong> Logistics Pipel<strong>in</strong>e. International Journal of<br />
Physical distribution and Logistics <strong>Management</strong>, 21(8).<br />
265
80. Gallorna J.L., 1998, Strategic <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Alignment, Best Practives In<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>. Grower publish<strong>in</strong>g, Hamsphire, England.<br />
81. Ganble R.H., 1994, Curse of Consignment Sales: Carry<strong>in</strong>g Customers<br />
Inventory Weighs Down Cash Flow. Corporate cash Flow, 15(10).<br />
82. Garges X., 1994, The Flexibility OfProduction Processes, A General Frame<br />
Work. <strong>Management</strong> of Science,40.<br />
83. Garrod P, Miklirs W., 1985, The Optimal Ship Size, A Comment. Journal of<br />
Transport Economics Policy, 19(1).<br />
84. Gavirneni, 2002, Information Flows In Capasitated <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> With<br />
Fixed Order Cost. <strong>Management</strong> Science, March.<br />
85. Geoffro<strong>in</strong>, Arthur M., 1976, Better Distribution Plann<strong>in</strong>g With Computer<br />
Models. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, July - August.<br />
86. Gibbs G.!., 1974, Handbook Of Games And Simulation Exercises. Sage<br />
Publications, BeverlyHills, Calif.<br />
87. Gilmour P., 1999, Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Operations. International<br />
Journal of Physical distribution and Logistics<strong>Management</strong>, 5(4).<br />
88. Gurnani H, Tang C.S., 1999, Optimal Order<strong>in</strong>g Decisions With In Certa<strong>in</strong><br />
CostAndDemand Forecast Updat<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Management</strong> of Science, 45.<br />
89. Gust<strong>in</strong> C.M, Danghesty P.J, Stank T.P., 1995, The Effects OfInformation<br />
Availability On Logistics Integration. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics,16(1).<br />
90. Hamel, (1985), Do You Really Have A Global Strategy. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
Review, July-August.<br />
91. Hanke J., 1989, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g In Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Schools: A follow-up Survey.<br />
International Journal of Forecast<strong>in</strong>g, 5(2).<br />
92. Hans H. H<strong>in</strong>terhuber, Woltgang Popp, 1992,Are You A Strategist Or JustA<br />
Manager? Hardward Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, Jan-February<br />
93. Harf Veld M., 1996, The Chemical Industry By Country-Brazil.<br />
Hydrocarbon process<strong>in</strong>g, 75(9).<br />
94. Harwick Tom, 1997, Optimal Decision Mak<strong>in</strong>g for the <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>.<br />
266
APICS-Performance Advantage, January.<br />
95. Hayuth Y., Pollatschek M.A., Rolley Y., 1994, Build<strong>in</strong>g A Port Simulator.<br />
Simulation, 63(3).<br />
96. Honlihan, John B., (1985), International <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>.<br />
International Journal of physical Distribution and materials management,<br />
15(1).<br />
97. Houlihan J.B., 988, International <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>, A New Approach.<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Decisions, 23(3).<br />
98. Houlihan J.B., 1987, International <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>.<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Decisions 17(2).<br />
99. Huchzeraseier A., M.A. Cohen, 1998, Valu<strong>in</strong>g Operational Flexibility<br />
Under Exchange Rate Risk. Operations Research, 44(1).<br />
100. Humburg Morris, 1970,Statistical Analysisfor DecisionMak<strong>in</strong>g. Harcourt,<br />
Brace, New York.<br />
101. Immer J.R., 1950, Layout Plann<strong>in</strong>g Technique, M.C. Graw Hill Book<br />
Company, NewYork.<br />
102. Ioannis A. Papazoglon, Gerasims S. Bonanos, Zoe S. Nivolianiton, Niys Jan<br />
Dnijm, Brigitte Rasmussen., 2000, Support<strong>in</strong>g Decision Makers In Land<br />
Use Plann<strong>in</strong>g Around Chemical Sites Case Study Expansion Of An Oil<br />
Ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Journal of Hazardons Material, 71.<br />
103. J.Gorden Murray, 1998, Effect OfA Green Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Strategy. <strong>Supply</strong><br />
<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 5(1).<br />
104. Jansen B., De Jong J.J., Roos C., Terlaky T., 1997, Sensitivity Analysis In<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g Just Be Careful, European Journal of Operations<br />
Research,101.<br />
105. Jansson J.O., Shneerson D., 1982, The Optimal Ship Size. Journal of<br />
Transport Economic Policy, 16(3).<br />
106. Johnson, (1995). Gam<strong>in</strong>g an Edge with <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>.<br />
APICS-The performance advantage, December.<br />
107. Jones C., Clarke J., 1990, effectiveness Framework for <strong>Supply</strong>-<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
267
<strong>Management</strong>. Computer <strong>in</strong>tegrated manufactur<strong>in</strong>g systems. 3(4). 196<br />
206.<br />
108. Jones T. C., Riley D.W., 1985, Us<strong>in</strong>g Inventory For Competitive Advantage<br />
Through <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>. International Journal of Physical<br />
Distribution and <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 15(5).<br />
109. Joseph B. Fuller, Ja<strong>in</strong>es O. Conor, Richard Rawl<strong>in</strong>son, 1993, Hired<br />
Logistics, The Next Advantage. Harward Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, (May - June).<br />
110. Karacapilidis N., Pappis C.P., 1997, A Framework For Group Decision<br />
Support Systems, Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g All Tools of OR Techniques, European<br />
Journal Operational Research, 103.<br />
111. Kefeng Xn, yau Dong, Philip T. Eves, 2001, Towards Better Co-Ord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
OfThe <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>,Transportation Research part E, 37.<br />
112. Khumawala, 1971, A Comparison Of Some Recent Warehouse Location<br />
Techniques. Logistics Review, 7(3).<br />
113. Klassen, 1994, Barriers To The <strong>Management</strong> OfInternational Operations.<br />
Journal of operations <strong>Management</strong>, 11(4).<br />
114. Kogut B., 1985, Design<strong>in</strong>g Global Strategies, Comparative And<br />
Competitive ValueAdded <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>s. Solon <strong>Management</strong> review.<br />
115. Konhdili E, Pantelides C.C., Sargent RW.H., 1993, A General Algorithm<br />
For Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Batch Operations. Computers & Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 17.<br />
116. Kopicld, RJ. 1999, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Investments In Develop<strong>in</strong>g Countries.<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Review, Sp<strong>in</strong>g 11(13)<br />
117. Kuchn, 1963, A Heuristics Program for Locat<strong>in</strong>g Warehouses.<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Science. 9(4)<br />
118. La Londe B.J., Masters J.M., 1994, Emerg<strong>in</strong>g Logistics Strategies:<br />
Bluepr<strong>in</strong>ts for the Next Century. International Journal of Physical<br />
Distribution and Logistics <strong>Management</strong>, 24(7).<br />
119. La Londe B.J., 1997, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, The Myth or Reality.<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Review.<br />
120. Lambert D.M., Robeson J.F., Stork J.R, 1979, An Appraisal Of The<br />
268
Integrated Physical Distribution Manager Concept. International Journal<br />
of Physical Distribution And Material <strong>Management</strong>, 9(1).<br />
121. Lambert Douglas M.,1998, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Implementation<br />
Issues and Research Opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics<br />
Managemen, 9(2).<br />
122. Langley C.J., Jr. E. Halcomb M.C.,1992, Creat<strong>in</strong>g Logistic Customer value.<br />
Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics.igfz).<br />
123. Lamm<strong>in</strong>g R.S., Johsen T., Zheng J., Harland C., 2000, An Initial<br />
Classification Of<strong>Supply</strong> Networks. International Journal of Operations &<br />
Production <strong>Management</strong>, 20(6), 675 - 691.<br />
124. Law A.M., W.D. Ketton., 1991, Simulation Model<strong>in</strong>g and Analysis. 2 nd<br />
Edition, Mc Graw Hill, New York.<br />
125. Law A.M., Keton., 1990, Introduction to Discrete Event Simulation. Mc<br />
Graw Hill, Toronto, Canada., 1990.<br />
126. Lee H., P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., Forssmann LE., Park S., 1996, Mixed Integer L<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
Programm<strong>in</strong>g Model For Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Short Term Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Of Crude Oil<br />
Unload<strong>in</strong>g With Inventory <strong>Management</strong>. Industrial & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Chemistry Research, 35.<br />
127. Lee H.L., K. Monizader, 1987, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Re-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Through<br />
Information Shar<strong>in</strong>g. Work<strong>in</strong>g paper, Stanford University.<br />
128. Lee H.L., Bill<strong>in</strong>gton C., 1993, Material <strong>Management</strong> In Decentralized<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>s. Operations Research.<br />
129. Lee H.L., Bill<strong>in</strong>gton C., 1995, The evolution of<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
ModelsAndPracticeatHewlett - Packard. Interface 25(5), 42-63.<br />
130. Lee H.L., S. Whang, 2002, Information Shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>.<br />
International Journal of Technical <strong>Management</strong>, 20.<br />
131. Lee J. Kragewski, Larry P. Ritzman, 2002, Operations <strong>Management</strong><br />
Strategy &Analysis. Pearson Education, India.<br />
132. Lee L. Hau, V.Padmanabhan, Seunj<strong>in</strong> Whang, 1997, The Bullwhip Effect In<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>s. Solan <strong>Management</strong> Review (Spr<strong>in</strong>g), 93-110.<br />
269
133. Lee T.S., Adam E.E. (Jr)., 1986, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Error Evaluation <strong>in</strong> MRP.<br />
Production Inventory System <strong>Management</strong> Science, 32(9).<br />
134. LeeT.S., (1992), Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Inventory: Pitfalls and<br />
Opportunities. Solan <strong>Management</strong> Review, Spr<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
135. Lenz RT., 1981, Determ<strong>in</strong>ants of Organizational Performance an<br />
Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary Review. Strategic <strong>Management</strong> Journal, 2.<br />
136. Lewis J.C., Na<strong>in</strong> M.M., Towill D.R., 1977, An Integrated Approach To<br />
Reeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Material And Logistics Control. International Journal of<br />
Physical distribution and logistics <strong>Management</strong>, 57(3-4)<br />
137. Lewis T., Talalayevsky A., 1997, Logistics And Information Technology A<br />
Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Perspective. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 18(1).<br />
138. Li-Hs<strong>in</strong>g Shih, 1997, Plann<strong>in</strong>g OfFuel CoalImports Us<strong>in</strong>g A Mixed Integer<br />
Programm<strong>in</strong>g Method. International Journal of production economics.<br />
139. L<strong>in</strong> Fu-Ren, Slaw M.J., 1998, Re-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g The Order Fulfillment<br />
Process In <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Network. International Journal of flexible<br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g systems, 10, 197-229.<br />
140. McCormek, 1994, The New Dynamics Of Global Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Site<br />
Location. Solan <strong>Management</strong> Reviewsummer.<br />
141. Macbeth D.K., Ferguson N., 1991, Strategic Aspects Of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong>. Integrated Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g System, 2(1), 8-12.<br />
142. Mand Gothe- Lundgren, Jan T. Lmdgren, Jan A pecsson., 2002, A<br />
Optimization Model For Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Production Schedul<strong>in</strong>g. International<br />
Journal of Production Economics, 78.<br />
143. Mansfield K.W., Maphet J.G., Ba<strong>in</strong> M.L., Boster W.H., Kennedy J.P., 1993,<br />
Gasol<strong>in</strong>e Blend<strong>in</strong>g With An Integrated On L<strong>in</strong>e Optimization, Schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />
And Control System. Paper 406, AICHE, National spr<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Houston, Tx.<br />
144. Marien E.J., 2000, The F<strong>in</strong>er <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Enables. <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> Review, 1(2).<br />
145. Mason-Jones R, Towill D.R, 1998, Time Compression In The <strong>Supply</strong><br />
270
<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Information <strong>Management</strong> In The Vital Ingredient. Logistics<br />
Information <strong>Management</strong>, 11(2).<br />
146. Mechmet Burnt, Wolfgang Faisst, John J. Kanet., 2002, Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong><br />
<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Coupl<strong>in</strong>g And Information System Perspective. European Journal of<br />
Purchas<strong>in</strong>g & <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 8.<br />
147. Melters R., 1997, Quantify<strong>in</strong>g The Bullwip Effect In <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>. Journal<br />
ofOperations <strong>Management</strong>, 15.<br />
148. Mentzer J.T., 1993, Manag<strong>in</strong>g Channel Relations In The 21 st Century.<br />
Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 14(1).<br />
149. Meredith J., 1998, Build<strong>in</strong>g Operations <strong>Management</strong> Theory Through<br />
Case Studies And Field Research. Journal of Operations <strong>Management</strong>, 16,<br />
441-454·<br />
150. Michael E. Porter, 1996, What is strategy? Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review,<br />
(November-December)<br />
151. Miller D., 1987, Strategy Mak<strong>in</strong>g And Structure : Analysis And<br />
Implications For Performance. Academy of <strong>Management</strong> Journal, 30(1).<br />
152. Miller D., 1992, The Generic Strategy Trap. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Strategy,<br />
(January).<br />
153. Miller T.e., 2001, Hierarchical Operations And <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, London, U.K.<br />
154. M<strong>in</strong> H., Melachr<strong>in</strong>oudis E., 1999, The Relocation Of A Hybrid<br />
Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g/Distribution Facility From <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Perspective: A<br />
CaseStudy. International Journal of <strong>Management</strong> Science, 27.<br />
155. M<strong>in</strong> H., Mentzer J.T., 2000, The Role of Market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong>. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics<br />
<strong>Management</strong>, 30(9).<br />
156. Mohan, 2000. E-commerce: An Imperative for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>. Industrial<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer Journal.<br />
157. Mo<strong>in</strong>zadeb K., P.K. Aggarwal, 1997, An Information Based Multi Echelon<br />
Inventory System With Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Orders. Operation Research, 3.<br />
271
158. Monfgomery J.P., 1972, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g and Time Series Analysis, Mc Graw<br />
Hill, New York.<br />
159. Morash E.A, Droge C., Vickery S.K., 1996, Strategic Logistics Capabilities<br />
For Competitive Advantage. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 13(2).<br />
160. Moro L.F.L., P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., 1998, A Mixed Integer Model For Short-Term<br />
Crude Schedul<strong>in</strong>g. AICHE Annual National meet<strong>in</strong>g, Paper 241 c, Miami<br />
Beach, FC.<br />
161. Moro L.F.L, Zan<strong>in</strong> AC, P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., 1998, A Plann<strong>in</strong>g Model For Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Diesel Production. Computer &Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 22.<br />
162. Morten T. Hansen, 1999, What Is Your Strategy For Manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Knowledge? Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, March-April.<br />
163. Muller W., 1991, Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g competitive advantage through customer<br />
satisfaction. European <strong>Management</strong> Journal, 9(2).<br />
164. Narasimhan R, Curter J.R., 1998, L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Unit And Material<br />
Sourc<strong>in</strong>g Strategies. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 19.<br />
165. Naylor T.H., 1966, Computer Simulation Techniques. John Wiley & Sons,<br />
New York.<br />
166. Nemetz P.C., Fry L.W., 1998, Flexible Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Organs. Academy of<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Review, 13.<br />
167. Noritake M., Kimura S., 1990, Optimum Allocation And Size OfSea Ports.<br />
Journal of water way, port, costal, and ocean Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, AS CE 116(2).<br />
168. Oral M., Dom<strong>in</strong>ique R.C., 1989, An Analytical Approach To Competitive<br />
Strategy Formulation In Nature Industries. lIE Transport, 21(3).<br />
169. Pagh J.D., Cooper M.C., 1998, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Postponement and Spemlation<br />
Strategies, How to Choose the Right Strategy. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
Logistics, 19 (2).<br />
170. Papazolou LA, Briasonllis H., Bonanos G., 1999, Risk Informed Decision<br />
Mak<strong>in</strong>g In Land UsePlann<strong>in</strong>g. Journal of Risk Research.<br />
171. Parker K., 2000, Surviv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Web Based World. <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
management Review4(1).<br />
272
172. Pasqale Legato, R<strong>in</strong>a M. Mazza., 2001, Best Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Resources<br />
Optimization At A Conta<strong>in</strong>er Term<strong>in</strong>al Via Discrete Event Simulation.<br />
Simulation.igg,<br />
173. Patterson P., 1999, E-commerce. The busies wall streetjournal, 20.<br />
174. Paul D. Larson, Dale S. Rogers, 1998, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition Growth, and approaches. Journal of Market<strong>in</strong>g Theory and<br />
Practices, 6(4).<br />
175. Pelham R, Pharris C., 1996, Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Operation And Control, A Future<br />
Vision. Hydrocarbon process<strong>in</strong>g, 75(7).<br />
176. Peter Lorange, Richard F. Vannue., 1976, How To Design A Strategic<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g System. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, (September-October)<br />
177. Petri A. Jok<strong>in</strong>en, 1996, A Life-CycleApproach To Automation Information<br />
<strong>Management</strong> In The Process Industries. ISATransactions, 35.<br />
178. P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., Grossmann I.C., 1998, AssignmentAnd Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g Models For<br />
The Schedul<strong>in</strong>g OfChemical Process. Annals of operations Research, 81.<br />
179. P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., Grossmann I.C., 1994, Optimal Cycle Schedul<strong>in</strong>g OfMultistage<br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Multi Product Plants. Computers and Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
18(9)·<br />
180. P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., Joly M., Moro L.F.L., 2000, Plann<strong>in</strong>g And Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Models<br />
For Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Operations. Computer and Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 24.<br />
181. Pope J.A., Talley W.K., 1988, Inventory Costs And Optimal Ship Size. The<br />
Logistic Transportation Review, (24).<br />
182. Porok S. Clang, Noh., 1987, Yong Doek: A Simulation Model For Bulk<br />
Cargo Operations. Simulation, 48(6).<br />
183. Porter M.E., 1980, Competitive Strategy, Techniques For Analyz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Industries And Competitors. Free Press, New York.<br />
184. Porter Michael E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage OfNations. Harvard<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, March-April.<br />
185. Raghuram. G., 1999, Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Materialfor Top management Programme<br />
for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Restructur<strong>in</strong>g. IIM, Ahemadabad<br />
273
186. Ram Ganeshan, Terry P. Harrison, 2001, An Introduction to <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong>. Rxy 112@silmaril. Smeal. Psu.edu.<br />
187. Ram narasimhan., S.O. Wook m<strong>in</strong>s, 2002, Effect of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
Integration on the Relationship Between Diversification and Performance.<br />
Journal of Operations <strong>Management</strong>.<br />
188. Ravi V., Reddy P.J., 1998, Fuzzy L<strong>in</strong>ear Fractional Goal Programm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Applied To Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Operations Plann<strong>in</strong>g. Fuzzy sets and systems, 96.<br />
189. Rigby B., Lasdon L.S., Waren A.D., 1995, The Evolution Of Tex Aco's<br />
Blend<strong>in</strong>g System: From OMEGA To Star Blond. Interfaces, 25(5).<br />
190. Robert S. Kaplan, Dvaid P. Norton, 2000, Hav<strong>in</strong>g Trouble with Your<br />
Strategy? Then Map It. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, September - October.<br />
191. Ronen D., 1986, Short Term Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Of Vessels For Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Bulk Or<br />
Semi-Bulk Commodities Orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g In A S<strong>in</strong>gle Area. Operations<br />
Research, 21.<br />
192. Ronen D., 1983, Cargo Ship Rout<strong>in</strong>g And Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Survey OfModels<br />
AndProblems. International Journal of Operations Research, 12.<br />
193. Ronen D., 1993, Ship Schedul<strong>in</strong>g The Last Decade. European Journal of<br />
Operations Research, 71.<br />
194. Ross, David F., (1996), Meet<strong>in</strong>g the Challenges of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong>. APICS-The Performance Advantage, September 1996.<br />
195. Rub<strong>in</strong> D.S., Wagner H.M., 1990, Shadow Prices: Tips And Traps For<br />
Managers AndInstructors. Interfaces, 20.<br />
196. S. Whand, 1998, Information Shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>, work<strong>in</strong>g paper,<br />
Stanford University.<br />
197. Sahay B.S, V<strong>in</strong>ita S<strong>in</strong>gh, A.K. Gupta., 2001, Manag<strong>in</strong>g Customer<br />
Relationship, A framework for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> & CRM<br />
Integration. Productivity, 42(1).<br />
198. Sahay B.S. (Ed)., 1999, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, Mac Millan, India.<br />
199. Sahay B.S., 2001, Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> for Global Challenges:<br />
Strategies for Success. <strong>Management</strong> and Change, 5(1)<br />
274
200. Sah<strong>in</strong>idis N.V., Grossmann I.E., 1991, MINLP Model For Cyclic Multi<br />
Product Schedul<strong>in</strong>g on Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Parallel L<strong>in</strong>es. Computers & Chemical<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 15.<br />
201. Savoie, B.J., 1998, The Last World On <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
Improvement. lIE solutions, October, 29-32.<br />
202. Schiber Thomas J., 1974, Simulation Us<strong>in</strong>g GPSS, Wiley, New York.<br />
203. Schruben, Lee W., 1995, Graphical Simulation AndModel<strong>in</strong>g AndAnalysis<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g SIGMA Or W<strong>in</strong>dows. International Thompson Publication, Toronto,<br />
Canada.<br />
204. Scott W.O., Leary-Kelly, Benito E. Flora, 2002, The Integration Of<br />
Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g And Market<strong>in</strong>g/Sales Decisions, Impact On Orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />
Performance. Journal of Operation <strong>Management</strong>.<br />
205. Shah N., 1996, Mathematical Programm<strong>in</strong>g Technique For Crude Oil<br />
Schedul<strong>in</strong>g. Computer & Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 20.<br />
206. Sr<strong>in</strong>ivasan K., Kekre S., Mukhopodhyay T., 1995, The Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Values Of<br />
Information Technology. A study of EDI, MIS quarterly, (June).<br />
207. Stevens G., 1989, Integrat<strong>in</strong>g The <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>. International Journal of<br />
Physical Distribution and Materials <strong>Management</strong>, 19(8), 3-8.<br />
208. Stock J.R., Lambert D.M., 1992, Becom<strong>in</strong>g A World Class Company With<br />
Logistics Service Quantity. The International Journal of Logistics<br />
<strong>Management</strong>, 3(1).<br />
209. Stuart I., Deckert P., Me Centchen D.M., Kunst R., 1998, Case Study A<br />
Leveraged Learn<strong>in</strong>g Network. Solan <strong>Management</strong> Review 39(4),81-93.<br />
210. Symonds G.H., 1995, L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g: The Solution Of Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />
Problems. ESSO standard oil company, New York.<br />
211. Theodore P. Stank, Patrick A. Traichal, 1998, Logistics Strategy,<br />
Organizational Design And Performance In A Cross-Border Environment.<br />
Logistics and Transportation Review, 34(1).<br />
212. Thomas Y. Choi, Ynnsook Hong, 2002, Unveil<strong>in</strong>g The Structure Of<strong>Supply</strong><br />
Network: Case Studies In Honda, Aaura, And Daimles Cheyster. Jim, 20<br />
275
213. Thonemann U.W., 2002, Improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong>-<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Performance By<br />
Shar<strong>in</strong>g Advance Demand Information. European Journal of Operational<br />
Research, 142.<br />
214. Towill, D.R, Del Vecchiw, A., 1994, The Application OfFilter Theory To<br />
The Study Of<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Dynamics. Production Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Control,<br />
5(1).<br />
215. Towill, D.R, 1991, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Dynamics. International Journal of<br />
Computer Integrated Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, 4, 197-208.<br />
216. Tyndall G., Gopal C., Partsch W., Kamuff J., 1998, Super Charg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong><br />
<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>s, New Ways Of Increas<strong>in</strong>g Value Through Global Operational<br />
Excellence. John WHey and Sons, New York.<br />
217. Tyndall, G.R, 2000, The Global <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Challenge. <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong> Review, 13(15)<br />
218. Vau Hec K.M., WHbrands RJ., 1988, Decision Support System For<br />
Conta<strong>in</strong>er Term<strong>in</strong>al Plann<strong>in</strong>g. European Journal of Operations Research,<br />
34·<br />
219. Ward J.E., Wendell R.E., 1990, Approaches To Sensitivity Analysis In<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g. Operations Research, 27.<br />
220. Walton H.J., 1981, Computer Simulation <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess. John WHey & SODS,<br />
New York.<br />
221. Weber A., 1929, On The Location Of Industries. University of Chicago<br />
press, Chicago.<br />
222. Wheel Wright S.C., Makridakis S., 1985, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods for<br />
management, 4 th Edition, John WHey and sons, New York.<br />
223. WHekes M.J., Edema S., 1995, Select<strong>in</strong>g ship unloaders for <strong>Indian</strong> ports.<br />
Bulk Solids Handl<strong>in</strong>g, 16(4).<br />
224. Wisner J.D., Stanley L.L., 1999, Internal Relationship And Activities<br />
Associated With High Level Of Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Service Quality. The Journal of<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 35.<br />
276
225. Woglodekar P.H., and S. Sahu, 1986, A Critique Of Some Current Plant<br />
Layout Techniques. International Journal of Operations and Production<br />
<strong>Management</strong>, 6(1).<br />
226. Wu S.D., R.H. Storer, L.A. Mart<strong>in</strong>-Vega, 1999, Special Issue On<br />
Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Logistics: An Overview. lIE Transactions, 31(ii), 4-6.<br />
227. Xiande zhao, J<strong>in</strong>x<strong>in</strong>g Xie, Janny Leung, 2002, The Impact OfForecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Models Selection On The Value OfInformation Shar<strong>in</strong>g In A <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>.<br />
European Journal of Operational Research, 142.<br />
228. Xucya Z., Sargent R.W.H., 1996, The Optimal Operation Of Mixed<br />
Production Facilities. Computer & Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 20(6).<br />
229. Yonng S., 1991, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Strategy As A Competitive Weapon.<br />
International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics management,<br />
21 (8).<br />
230. Yum W.Y., Choi Y.S., 1999, A Simulation Model For Conta<strong>in</strong>er Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
Operation. Journal of Production Economics, 59.<br />
231. Zahara S.A., Cov<strong>in</strong> J.G., 1993, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Strategy, Technology Policy And<br />
Firm Performance. Strategic <strong>Management</strong> Journal.<br />
Web sites referred<br />
1. Alan Greenspan, The grow<strong>in</strong>g role of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management III the<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated enterprise, www.rmg.se/pages/RMD<br />
2. Lisa A. Robert, Understand<strong>in</strong>g your supply cha<strong>in</strong>, www.iipuk.co.uk<br />
3. Charles X. Wang, A taxonomic review of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management research,<br />
www.l<strong>in</strong>do.com<br />
4. Erik Manley, <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management and ERP, www.unstats.com<br />
5. Bill Helm<strong>in</strong>g, Jan Paul Zonnenberg, The five fulcrum po<strong>in</strong>ts of a supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
strategy, www.petroleum.com<br />
6. Gartner, <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management software, www.kluweracademic.com<br />
7. www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil/petroleurn/analysispublication/oilmarketbasics.This<br />
site was extensively used for the preparation of basic material <strong>in</strong> chapter Ill.<br />
277
List of Publications<br />
Kemthose P.Paul, M.Bhasi, 2001. A simulation based DSS for selection ofcrude<br />
oil, International conference on logistics and SCM.<br />
Kemthose P.Paul, M.Bhasi, 2002. Inbound logistic strategy for an oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery,<br />
VI annual conference of the society of Operations <strong>Management</strong>.<br />
Kemthose P.Paul, M.Bhasi,2003. Improv<strong>in</strong>g truck load<strong>in</strong>g yard operations <strong>in</strong> an<br />
oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery, National Conference on World Class Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
RSasikumar, Kemthose P Paul.M'Bhasi.zoog. Crude Tanker Selectionfor<br />
Efficient UseofOil Term<strong>in</strong>al Us<strong>in</strong>g Simulation, VI Conference of the Association<br />
of Asian-Pacific Operational Research Societies (APORS) on "Operations<br />
Research: Emerg<strong>in</strong>g Paradigms for Information Technology"(Accepted paper)<br />
278