03.08.2013 Views

Supply Chain Management in Indian Petroleum Refineries

Supply Chain Management in Indian Petroleum Refineries

Supply Chain Management in Indian Petroleum Refineries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IN<br />

INDIAN PETROLEUM REFINERIES<br />

Thesis submitted to the<br />

COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY<br />

<strong>in</strong> partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the award<br />

of the Degree ofDoctor ofPhilosophy<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

under the Faculty ofSocial Sciences<br />

Under the supervision of<br />

Dr.M. BHASI<br />

Reader, School of<strong>Management</strong> Studies<br />

SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES<br />

COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY<br />

KOCHI - 682 002<br />

OCTOBER - 2003


DR. M. Bhasi M.Tech, Ph.D (IITKGP)<br />

Reader<br />

School of <strong>Management</strong> Studies<br />

Coch<strong>in</strong> university of Science and Technology<br />

Kochi - 682 022, Kerala<br />

Phone: (0484) 2575310 Extn - 241<br />

Email: mbhasi@cusat.ac.<strong>in</strong><br />

CERTIFICATE<br />

Certified that this thesis entitled "SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT<br />

IN INDIAN PETROLEUM REFINERIES", submitted to the Coch<strong>in</strong><br />

University of Science and Technology, Kochifor the award of Ph.D. Degree, is the<br />

record of bonafide research carried out by Mr. Kemthose P. Paul under my<br />

supervision and guidance at the School of <strong>Management</strong> Studies. This work did<br />

not form part of any dissertation submitted for the award of any degree, diploma,<br />

associate ship or other similar title or recognition from this or any other<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitution.<br />

Kochi-22.<br />

15-10-2003<br />

D. .Bhasi,<br />

(Supervis<strong>in</strong>g guide)


Abstract<br />

<strong>Petroleum</strong> oil is the lifeblood of a modern nation. The importance of its<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> is therefore evident. <strong>Petroleum</strong> oil supply cha<strong>in</strong>s are large flow type<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong>s. Sources of crude oil are fixed by natural availability to certa<strong>in</strong><br />

regions. Oil requirement is however more global with developed cold regions<br />

requir<strong>in</strong>g more of it. Economics dictate that ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is to be done nearer to<br />

demand locations. The first problem that is tackled <strong>in</strong> this thesis is that of<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g a model for ref<strong>in</strong>ery location selection. A multistage multi-factor<br />

model us<strong>in</strong>g weighted rank<strong>in</strong>g has been developed for this.<br />

Facility design and its creation lay the playground for operations. The<br />

importance of proper facilities plann<strong>in</strong>g is therefore worth not<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />

importance of build<strong>in</strong>g flexibility of different types <strong>in</strong> to facility design is<br />

addressed <strong>in</strong> this thesis. The importance of flexibility is more because of<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> terms of availability and price of crude oil on one side and<br />

products demand on the other side, over the long life time of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Once facilities are ready, proper plann<strong>in</strong>g is necessary for their operations.<br />

For plann<strong>in</strong>g of ref<strong>in</strong>ery, supply cha<strong>in</strong> hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g model to suit the<br />

post Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism scenario <strong>in</strong> India is developed. The<br />

hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g models have annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, quarterly plann<strong>in</strong>g, monthly<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g, and daily plann<strong>in</strong>g modules <strong>in</strong>terconnected with appropriate data<br />

flows.<br />

In order to implement supply cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g and control models, an<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation flow system is essential. A model for such a system is also<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> the thesis.<br />

Lastly no study on operations is complete without look<strong>in</strong>g at the current<br />

operations and problems <strong>in</strong>volved there<strong>in</strong>. The <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound<br />

logistic system of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery (Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited) has been studied <strong>in</strong> detail.<br />

Bottlenecks, excess capacity, and other related problems are discussed <strong>in</strong> detail.<br />

Recommendations for solutions to some of the identified problems are also given<br />

<strong>in</strong> this thesis.<br />

The attempt <strong>in</strong> this thesis is there fore to look at ref<strong>in</strong>ery supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

problem <strong>in</strong> totality from locations plann<strong>in</strong>g to operations and to solve the relative<br />

problems.<br />

Key words: <strong>Petroleum</strong> oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery, <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management, Location,<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Information systems, Operations, and Models.


Table of Contents<br />

List of Figures Hi<br />

Listof Tables v<br />

Abbreviations vii<br />

Chapter I<br />

Introduction to the Study<br />

1.1 Introduction 1<br />

1.2 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> 3<br />

1.3 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Practices 5<br />

1.4 Literature on Importance of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> 9<br />

1.5 Importance of SCM to a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery 10<br />

1.6 This study and its objectives 12<br />

1.7 Scheme of the Study 12<br />

Chapter II<br />

Review of Literature<br />

2.1 Introduction 13<br />

2.2 Concept of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> 13<br />

2.3 Evolution of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>.. 14<br />

2.4 Location for a New Ref<strong>in</strong>ery 16<br />

2.5 Flexibility of Resources 18<br />

2.6 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g 19<br />

2.7 Integration of Operations 23<br />

2.8 Information Technology 24<br />

2.9 Tools Used <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> 27<br />

2.10 Conclusion 30<br />

Chapter III<br />

Model for Selection of New Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Location<br />

3.1 Introduction 32<br />

3.2 Global <strong>Petroleum</strong> <strong>Supply</strong><strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> 33<br />

3.3 <strong>Indian</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> 59<br />

3.4 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Location Selection Model 70<br />

3.5 Identification of Flexibility for Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Configuration 79<br />

3.6 Process Selection for an Oil Ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> India 90<br />

3.7 Conclusion 98<br />

Chapter IV<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g for a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

4.1 Introduction 100<br />

4.2 Problems <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>Supply</strong><strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> 102<br />

4.3 Hierarchical Model for Plann<strong>in</strong>g 109<br />

4.4 Plann<strong>in</strong>g Demand 117<br />

1


4.5 L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g for Selection of Crude Oil 123<br />

4.6 Ship Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Model 126<br />

4.7 Internal Logistics Plann<strong>in</strong>g 135<br />

4.8 Outbound Logistic Plann<strong>in</strong>g 139<br />

4.9 Conclusion 141<br />

Chapter V<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>and Information Technology<br />

5.1 Introduction 143<br />

5.2 Problem and objective 144<br />

5.3 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Components 144<br />

5.4 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Efficiency Improvement Us<strong>in</strong>g Information<br />

Technology 160<br />

5.5 Application of SCM Software <strong>in</strong> a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery 173<br />

5.6 Conclusion 187<br />

Chapter VI<br />

Strategic and Operational SCM Problems and Some Solution for a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

6.1 Introduction 189<br />

6.2 Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>Management</strong> of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> KRL 189<br />

6.3 Logistics Operations <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> of KRL 198<br />

6.4 Conclusion 248<br />

Chapter VII<br />

Summary, Conclusion, and SCope for Further Work<br />

7.1 Introduction 251<br />

7.2 Summary 251<br />

7.3 Limitations of the Work 257<br />

7.4 Conclusions of the Study 258<br />

7.5 Scope for Further Work 259<br />

Reference 260<br />

Listof Publications 278<br />

11


List of Figures<br />

Figure 1.1 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Integration 2<br />

Figure 1.2 Three important flows <strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong> 11<br />

Figure 3.1 World Crude oil <strong>Supply</strong> 41<br />

Figure 3.2 Comparison of capacity & throughput 47<br />

Figure 3.3 Capacity utilization (percentage) 47<br />

Figure 3.4 Comparison of crude and product export 48<br />

Figure 3.5 World Consumption of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products 48<br />

Rgure 3.6 Consumption of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products comparison 50<br />

Figure 3.7 Number of ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the world 54<br />

Figure 3.8 World map on ref<strong>in</strong>eries 54<br />

Figure 3.9 Demand <strong>Supply</strong> Balance 61<br />

Figure 3.10 <strong>Indian</strong> petroleum map 68<br />

Figure 3.11 Internal Logistics costs <strong>in</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>ery 69<br />

Figure 3.12 Logistics Costs Vs capacity 69<br />

Figure 3.13 Model for Location Selection 72<br />

Figure 3.14 Relationship diagram 80<br />

Figure 3.15 Components of logistic flexibility for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery 81<br />

Figure 4.1 Production system (simplified) 101<br />

Figure 4.2 Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g strategy 109<br />

Rgure 4.3 Hierarchical model for plann<strong>in</strong>g 112<br />

Rgure 4.4 Flow chart of plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure 128<br />

Figure 4.5 Number of Crude oil tankers arrival 129<br />

Figure 4.6 Demurrages paid <strong>in</strong> an year 129<br />

Figure 4.8 Flow chart show<strong>in</strong>g logic used <strong>in</strong> ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g optimization model 132<br />

Figure 4.9 Transport<strong>in</strong>g cost 134<br />

Figure 4.10 Storage tank allocation decision 136<br />

Figure 4.12 Blend<strong>in</strong>g decision mak<strong>in</strong>g model 139<br />

Figure 5.1 <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> components 145<br />

Figure 5.2 Effect of sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> logistic on profit compared to output improvement 146<br />

Figure 5.3 The value cha<strong>in</strong> 146<br />

Figure 5.4 Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Competitive advantage through supply cha<strong>in</strong> 148<br />

Figure 5.5 Information flow with<strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery 151<br />

Figure 5.7 Information flow for plann<strong>in</strong>g 155<br />

Figure 5.8 Control system 155<br />

Figure 5.9 Ledger report<strong>in</strong>g system 156<br />

Figure 5.10 Three way bill match<strong>in</strong>g procedure 158<br />

Figure 5.11 Two-way bill match<strong>in</strong>g 159<br />

111


Figure 5.12 Priority of Applications<br />

Figure 5.13 IT Functionality of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

Figure 5.14 Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g design of logistics <strong>in</strong>formation system<br />

Figure 5.15 Aggregate Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 5.16 Ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />

Figure 5.17 Ship selection procedure<br />

Figure 5.18 Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Operation Models<br />

Figure 5.19 Information flow model for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

Figure 5.10 High level <strong>in</strong>formation model<br />

Figure 6.1 Product portfolio of the market<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />

Figure 6.2 Comparison of quantities of different products sold the OMC<br />

Figure 6.3 <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery limited<br />

Figure 6.4 Monthly crude arrivals<br />

Figure 6.5 Number of tankers received<br />

Figure 6.6 lime for berth<strong>in</strong>g to commence discharge<br />

Figure 6.7 Average Crude Parcel<br />

Figure 6.8 Change <strong>in</strong> cost with number of ships<br />

Figure 6.9 Demurrage paid by KRL<br />

Figure 6.10 Monthly crude arrival<br />

Figure 6.11 Crude consumption<br />

Figure 6.12 Crude stock <strong>in</strong> each month<br />

Figure 6.13 <strong>Supply</strong> consumption gap<br />

Figure 6.14 MS Production and sales<br />

Figure 6.15 Monthly SKO production and sales<br />

Figure 6.16 Monthly production and Sales<br />

Figure 6.17 Naphtha production and sales<br />

Figure 6.18 ATF Production and sales<br />

Figure 6.19 JP-5 Production and sales<br />

Figure 6.20 LDO production and sales<br />

Figure 6.21 LSHS Production and sales<br />

Figure 6.22 Fa Production and Sales<br />

Figure 6.23 BITUMEN production and sales<br />

Rgure 6.24 Tanker transfer of each product<br />

Figure 6.25 Despatch of products us<strong>in</strong>g wagons<br />

Figure 6.26 Despatch of products by road ."<br />

Figure 6.27 Truck Arrivals<br />

Figure 6.28 Truck Departure<br />

Figure 6.29 Inter-arrival time<br />

Figure 6.30 Inter-departure time<br />

IV<br />

161<br />

164<br />

174<br />

175<br />

175<br />

176<br />

178<br />

179<br />

185<br />

195<br />

195<br />

200<br />

207<br />

207<br />

208<br />

217<br />

219<br />

220<br />

222<br />

222<br />

222<br />

223<br />

225<br />

225<br />

225<br />

226<br />

226<br />

227<br />

227<br />

228<br />

228<br />

229<br />

232<br />

235<br />

237<br />

241<br />

241<br />

241<br />

241


Figure 6.31 Time Vs Inter-arrival time<br />

Figure 6.32 Time Vs Inter-departure time<br />

Figure 6.33 Truck load<strong>in</strong>g time<br />

Figure 6.34 Truck load<strong>in</strong>g time<br />

Figure 6.35 Hourlytruck load<strong>in</strong>g time<br />

Figure 6.36 Transferof product through pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Figure 6.37 Total pipel<strong>in</strong>e transfer<br />

Figure 6.38 Quantity transferred through each mode<br />

List of Tables<br />

242<br />

242<br />

242<br />

242<br />

243<br />

246<br />

247<br />

248<br />

Table 1.1 A Classification of Logistics Related Managerial Decision Problems 4<br />

Table 3.1 World proven crude oil reserves by region, 1996-2001 (m. b.) 40<br />

Table 3.2 World output of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products by region, 1996-2001(1000b/d) 41<br />

Table 3.3 World exports of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products by region, 1996-2001(1000b/d) 47<br />

Table 3.4 World Crude oil exports by region, 1996-2001(1000b/d) 48<br />

Table 3.5 OPEC Members crude oil exports by dest<strong>in</strong>ation, 1997-2001(1000b/d) 49<br />

Table 3.6 Largest International traders <strong>in</strong> Crude and <strong>Petroleum</strong> products 49<br />

Table 3.7 World Consumption of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products by region, 1996-2001(1000b/d) 50<br />

Table 3.8 World ref<strong>in</strong>ery capacity by region, 1996 - 2001 (1000 b/d) 53<br />

Table 3.9 Global ref<strong>in</strong>eries 54<br />

Table 3.10 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> Asia Pacific (OOObb/d) 55<br />

Table 3.11 Self Reliance of <strong>Petroleum</strong> Products 60<br />

Table 3.12 Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India 64<br />

Table 3.13 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity utilization <strong>in</strong> India 65<br />

Table 3.14 Private Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India 67<br />

Table 3.15 Cost comparison us<strong>in</strong>g Spreadsheet 73<br />

Table 3.16 Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for factor selection 75<br />

Table 3.17 Selected factors 75<br />

Table 3.18 Relative Scor<strong>in</strong>g Procedure 76<br />

Table 3.19 Preference Matrixes 78<br />

Table 3.20 Weighted Score 79<br />

Table 3.21 Oil and condensate <strong>in</strong> billion barrel 82<br />

Table 3.22 Classification of ships 83<br />

Table 3.23 Crude oil properties at different locations 84<br />

Table 3.24 Flexibility areas and their impacts 89<br />

Table 3.25 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery up gradation options 93<br />

Table 3.26 Optimum processes configuration <strong>in</strong> India. 95<br />

v


Table 4.1 Matrix of logistics problems 104<br />

Table 4.2 Modes of product movement 108<br />

Table 4.3 Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g 115<br />

Table 4.4 Roll<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g 116<br />

Table 4.5 Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g 117<br />

Table 4.6 Consumption of products 120<br />

Table 4.7 Comparison of forecasts us<strong>in</strong>g different tools 120<br />

Table 4.8 Description of events <strong>in</strong> event graph of the simulation model 131<br />

Table 4.9 Relationship between ship hire cost per ton 133<br />

Table 4.10 Calculation cost <strong>in</strong> truck transport 140<br />

Table 4.11 DSS for transport model selection 140<br />

Table 5.1 Data generated at each department along with their ma<strong>in</strong> process. 181<br />

Table 6.1 Project implementation <strong>in</strong> KRL 191<br />

Table 6.2 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Marg<strong>in</strong>s 192<br />

Table 6.3 Details of Berths available at Kochi fort for oil handl<strong>in</strong>g 206<br />

Table 6.4 Analysis show<strong>in</strong>g the crude handl<strong>in</strong>g bottleneck at Kochi port 206<br />

Table 6.5 Ships and their details 215<br />

Table 6.6 Performance of tankers that brought KRL crude <strong>in</strong> 1998-99 216<br />

Table 6.7 Number of ships per month 220<br />

Table 6.8 Gross tankage requirement for controlled products <strong>in</strong> Million Tons 230<br />

Table 6.9 Gross tankage requirement for de-controlled products 230<br />

VI


Abbreviations used <strong>in</strong> this thesis<br />

APM Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism<br />

ATF Aviation Turb<strong>in</strong>e Fuel<br />

BH Bombay high<br />

BPC Bharat <strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Ltd.,<br />

BRPL Bongaigaon Ref<strong>in</strong>eries and Petrochemicals Ltd.,<br />

CAGR Compounded Average Growth Rate<br />

COT Coch<strong>in</strong> Oil Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

CPCL Chennai <strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Limited<br />

CRL Coch<strong>in</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Ltd.,<br />

DMT Dimethyl Terephthalate<br />

DRP Distribution resource plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

DRP Distribution Resources Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

DSS Decision Support System<br />

EDI Electronic data Interchange<br />

ETA Energy Information Adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

ERP Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ETG Expert Technical Group<br />

GAlL Gas Authority of India Ltd.,<br />

GDP Gross Domestic product<br />

GIS Geographical <strong>in</strong>formation Systems<br />

Gal Government of India<br />

HPC H<strong>in</strong>dustan <strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Ltd.,<br />

IBP Indo Burmah <strong>Petroleum</strong> Company<br />

IOC <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation Ltd.,<br />

IOC <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation Limited<br />

JIT Just - <strong>in</strong> - time<br />

KRL Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited<br />

LNG Liquefied Natural Gas<br />

LPG Liquefied <strong>Petroleum</strong> Gas<br />

vii


LS<br />

MIS<br />

MMT<br />

MMTPA ­<br />

MoP&NG­<br />

MRL<br />

MRP<br />

MRP-II ­<br />

MRPL<br />

NRL<br />

OCC<br />

OEB<br />

OECD<br />

OIL<br />

ONGC<br />

OPA<br />

OPEC<br />

SPM<br />

TPS<br />

VLCC<br />

wro<br />

Lowsulfur<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Information System<br />

Million Metric Tons<br />

Million tons per annum<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Oil <strong>Petroleum</strong> and Natural Gas<br />

Madras Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Ltd.,<br />

Elaborate material requirement plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g resources plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Mangalore Ref<strong>in</strong>eries and Petrochemicals Ltd.<br />

Numaligarh Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited<br />

Oil Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Committee<br />

Oil economic budget<br />

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development<br />

Oil India Ltd.,<br />

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.<br />

Oil pool account<br />

Organization of <strong>Petroleum</strong> Export<strong>in</strong>g Countries<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t moor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transaction Process<strong>in</strong>g System<br />

Very Large Crude Carrier<br />

World Trade Organization<br />

VIII


1.1 Introduction<br />

CHAPTER I<br />

Introduction to the Study<br />

This thesis deals with the study of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> of petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>eries,<br />

more specifically, with the supply cha<strong>in</strong> activities such as sourc<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil, its<br />

shipp<strong>in</strong>g, storage, ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, product storage, blend<strong>in</strong>g, and f<strong>in</strong>ally dispatch of<br />

productsfrom the ref<strong>in</strong>ery for distribution, and sale.<br />

<strong>Petroleum</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is a material flow <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>dustry where supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> cost amounts to 40% of total ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and distribution cost. Un<strong>in</strong>terrupted<br />

flow of <strong>in</strong>puts and outputs <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g byproducts and wastes with m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

facilities are crucial to cost effective and efficient operation of capital <strong>in</strong>tensive,<br />

process oriented, tightly coupled system such as a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Mithcelson [1992] has<br />

discussed the importance of materials management <strong>in</strong> capital <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries. Raw materials and logistics are very important to ref<strong>in</strong>eries as the<br />

former constitutes a significant component of the total manufactur<strong>in</strong>g cost and<br />

the later seriously affects the output, productivity and profitability of the plant.<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management bottlenecks have long term as well as short term<br />

impacts on the economics of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In order to understand the implications<br />

ofsupplycha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> materials and energy <strong>in</strong>tensive ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the chang<strong>in</strong>g global<br />

scenario, it is essential to know the scope, coverage and importance of supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> general and supply cha<strong>in</strong> management <strong>in</strong> particular. <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

management focuses on the technical organization of the flow of goods and<br />

services <strong>in</strong> the value cha<strong>in</strong>, from the supplier to the customer. Shell global<br />

solution have claimed that supply cha<strong>in</strong> management (SCM) has shown that<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g, feed stock selection and optimization of<br />

distribution, supply, and manufactur<strong>in</strong>g have positively impacted their bottom<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

SCM <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>in</strong> the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g activities of <strong>in</strong>bound logistics,<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal logistics, outbound logistics,service logistics, and reverse logistics of any<br />

1


<strong>in</strong>dustry. In the case of petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry, application of service and reverse<br />

logistics is very limited because these two activities are not that common.<br />

Inbound logistics deals with all the activities start<strong>in</strong>g from selection of crude oil<br />

to receiv<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil <strong>in</strong> the tanks at ref<strong>in</strong>ery tank farm. Internal logistics deals<br />

with all the operations start<strong>in</strong>g from crude oil tank to the pump<strong>in</strong>g of ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

products to the tanks for f<strong>in</strong>al products. Outbound logistics deals with the<br />

operations like selection of transport mode for distribution of products, mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

arrangements for delivery of products, and distribution of products through the<br />

selected mode of transport. Figure 1.1 shows stages of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration.<br />

1.2 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lambert and Stock [1993], logistics, a widely accepted term<br />

by today's professionals, had <strong>in</strong> the past a variety of names <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g physical<br />

distribution, supply cha<strong>in</strong> management and bus<strong>in</strong>ess logistics. The Council of<br />

Logistics <strong>Management</strong> def<strong>in</strong>es logistics as:<br />

"The process of plann<strong>in</strong>g, implement<strong>in</strong>g and controll<strong>in</strong>g the efficient,<br />

cost-effective flow and storage of raw materials, <strong>in</strong>-process <strong>in</strong>ventory, f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

goods and related <strong>in</strong>formation from the po<strong>in</strong>t of orig<strong>in</strong> to the po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />

consumption for the purpose of conform<strong>in</strong>g to customer requirements"<br />

flows:<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the above def<strong>in</strong>ition logistics consists of the follow<strong>in</strong>g four<br />

Material Flow: Flow of materials from their sources through necessary<br />

processes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gtheir storage, retrieval and the delivery of f<strong>in</strong>ished products.<br />

Merchandise Flow: Flow'of f<strong>in</strong>ished goods from f<strong>in</strong>ished good's stores <strong>in</strong><br />

the distribution channels to the customers.<br />

Money Flow: Flow of money <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g advances from organizations to<br />

suppliers of raw materials, energy, services, etc. and <strong>in</strong>to organizations from the<br />

wholesalers, distributors, customers, etc.<br />

Information Flow: Flow of required <strong>in</strong>formation from and <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

organization through various communication channels <strong>in</strong> the logistics system.<br />

3


Table 1.1 A Classification of Logistics Related Managerial Decision Problems<br />

I<br />

Material Flow<br />

I Infrastructure<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Facility Location<br />

Materials<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Procurement<br />

Technology<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Equipment Selection<br />

People<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Organization<br />

Raw Material, Facility Design Transportation Systems and Design<br />

Work-<strong>in</strong>-process,<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ished Goods<br />

Improvement of<br />

Exist<strong>in</strong>g Facility<br />

Inventory Control<br />

Storage<br />

WIP<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ished Goods<br />

dispatch<br />

Procedures based<br />

on Technology<br />

Job Specifications<br />

Incentive Schemes<br />

Selection of Inventory Control Mode ofTransport Organization<br />

Merchandise supply I Distribution and Handl<strong>in</strong>g Design<br />

Flow distribution<br />

channels<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Equipment Selection<br />

Systems and<br />

Job Specifications<br />

Incentive Schemes<br />

Contract terms<br />

with members of<br />

supply I<br />

distribution<br />

channel<br />

Procedures<br />

Money Flow<br />

Selection of<br />

Banks and credit!<br />

payment<br />

arrangements<br />

modes<br />

Budget<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Account<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

cash flow<br />

management<br />

Equipment Selection<br />

Systems and<br />

Procedures based<br />

on Technology and<br />

recutatons<br />

Organization<br />

Design<br />

Job Specifications<br />

Incentive Schemes<br />

Selection of How often who will In this case it acts Organization<br />

Information Flow modes of communicate what through Design<br />

communication <strong>in</strong>formation to <strong>in</strong>frastructure and Job Specifications<br />

Design oflogistic whom for tak<strong>in</strong>g systems Incentive Schemes<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

system<br />

what decisions?<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>in</strong>terruptions <strong>in</strong> any of the above four flows affect an organization's<br />

raw materials supply (purchas<strong>in</strong>g), manufactur<strong>in</strong>g (operations) and market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(distribution) functions. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Fawcett and Fawcett [1995], there exists a<br />

need to <strong>in</strong>tegrate these flows through effective management of <strong>in</strong>frastructure,<br />

materials, technology and people. The typical managerial decision problem that<br />

one encounters <strong>in</strong> real life while deal<strong>in</strong>g with the management of above four flows<br />

of the logistics system is summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 1.1. In this thesis, the concern is<br />

with the supply cha<strong>in</strong> management of an oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery. More specifically, it is<br />

concerned with the decisions on <strong>in</strong>frastructure facilities and transportation of<br />

crude oil to the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, and the movement of f<strong>in</strong>ished products out of the<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

4


1.3 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Practices<br />

In India approximately 13 percent of the GDP is spent on logistics<br />

(Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission report-zooz), whereas this Figure is only 10 percent for<br />

developed countries. <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management and logistics are still <strong>in</strong> the<br />

embryonic stage <strong>in</strong> India. The current lull <strong>in</strong> the economy is forc<strong>in</strong>g many<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries to exam<strong>in</strong>e their costs, and cut it down <strong>in</strong> size. Today excellent logistics<br />

management has become essential for success of companies. Logistics function<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes the total flow of material, from the acquisition of raw materials to<br />

delivery of f<strong>in</strong>ished products to the ultimate users. As such, it <strong>in</strong>cludes the<br />

activities of sourc<strong>in</strong>g and purchas<strong>in</strong>g, conversion <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g capacity plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

technology selection, operations management, production schedul<strong>in</strong>g, materials<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g, distribution plann<strong>in</strong>g and management of <strong>in</strong>dustry warehouse<br />

operations, <strong>in</strong>ventory management, <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound<br />

transportation; l<strong>in</strong>kage with customer service, sales, reverse logistics, promotion<br />

and market<strong>in</strong>g activities.<br />

Successful supply cha<strong>in</strong> management is extremely complex because of<br />

large number of players with vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest or objectives are <strong>in</strong>volved. Though<br />

the supply cha<strong>in</strong> of each company has its own unique features, the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples help <strong>in</strong> management of supply cha<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

• Beg<strong>in</strong>with the customer<br />

• Manage logistic assets<br />

• Organize customer management<br />

• Integrate sales and operations plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Leverage manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and sourc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Focus on strategic alliances and relationship management<br />

• Developcustomer driven performance measures<br />

A significant new trend has been evolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> logistics management <strong>in</strong> the<br />

last decade - one that <strong>in</strong>volves the collaboration of all participants <strong>in</strong> the supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> order to reduce the cost of total logistics system. It has been referred to<br />

as "<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>", "Logistics Partnership" or "Inter-Corporate<br />

5


Logistics <strong>Management</strong>". In traditional Logistics "total cost concepts" model,<br />

companies worked to manage logistics as an entity and to lower the total logistics<br />

costs to the organization. The model evolved balanc<strong>in</strong>g trade-off among<br />

production run lengths, <strong>in</strong>ventory, transportation, and warehous<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

customer service. Later an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of companies realized that though<br />

the total cost concepts might be useful, it is ta<strong>in</strong>ted because it does not consider<br />

the efficiency of the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong>. The supply cha<strong>in</strong> management on the<br />

other hand <strong>in</strong>volves the active collaboration of two or more participants <strong>in</strong> the<br />

supply channel (Supplier, manufacturer, distributor, and/or customer) to<br />

manage all the logistics resources <strong>in</strong> the most efficient manner possible.<br />

The concept of "quick response" ga<strong>in</strong>ed broad favour as companies <strong>in</strong> all<br />

parts of supply cha<strong>in</strong> developed an appreciation of its potent benefits. Quick<br />

response <strong>in</strong>volves the <strong>in</strong>tegration of the supply cha<strong>in</strong>, effectivelyl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g retailers,<br />

suppliers (manufacturers/ distributors) and carriers <strong>in</strong> close communication and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. Key elements of quick response <strong>in</strong>cludes:<br />

• Po<strong>in</strong>t-of-usage data capture<br />

• Hem - level management<br />

• RapidCommunication<br />

• Partnerships<br />

• Discipl<strong>in</strong>e and commitment<br />

Effective quick - response systems' benefits <strong>in</strong>clude lower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventories<br />

by as much as 40 percent, improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>-stock availability significantly, cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transaction and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative costs <strong>in</strong> to half, reduc<strong>in</strong>g replenishment lead to a<br />

third or less of their former levels, identify<strong>in</strong>g slow-sell<strong>in</strong>g items sooner, and<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g operat<strong>in</strong>g costs for all players <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management strategy <strong>in</strong>volves determ<strong>in</strong>ation of what<br />

performance criteria the logistics system must ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> - more specifically, the<br />

service levels and cost objectives the logistics system must meet. Because cost<br />

and service normally <strong>in</strong>volve a trade-off, a company must consciously consider<br />

that trade-off and determ<strong>in</strong>e the desired supply cha<strong>in</strong> performance. This process<br />

6


<strong>in</strong>volves consideration of the company's strategic objectives, its specific<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g strategy and customer service requirements and its competitors' cost­<br />

service position.<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves the development and management of all<br />

logistics resources <strong>in</strong> order to atta<strong>in</strong> the desired cost-service performance<br />

consideration, it might <strong>in</strong>clude number and location of warehouses, type of<br />

warehouses, mode and carrier selection, <strong>in</strong>ventory position, <strong>in</strong>ventory levels,<br />

orderentry technologies and <strong>in</strong>formation system, and so forth.<br />

Opportunities for differentiation - based on operational, logistics, or<br />

customer services excellence - are more likely to be exploited. <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

management tends to have a more visible and more important role <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Company. Investments <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> function or <strong>in</strong>frastructure are more<br />

likely to be approved.<br />

Just - <strong>in</strong> - time (JIT) Logistics: It is useful to classify JIT programs <strong>in</strong>to<br />

two categories, JIT production and JIT logistics. These programs typicallyfocus<br />

onthe reduction of set up funds for key operations, the reduction of lot size, and<br />

the enhancement of quality - all lead<strong>in</strong>g to lower work - <strong>in</strong> - progress <strong>in</strong>ventories.<br />

JIT logistics programs, on the other hand, apply JIT pr<strong>in</strong>ciples to the<br />

management of raw materials, <strong>in</strong>ventories and beyond supplies. For JIT logistics<br />

plans to work,four 'Pillars' must be <strong>in</strong> place. They are:<br />

• STable production schedules<br />

• Efficient Communication<br />

• Co-ord<strong>in</strong>atedtransportation<br />

• Quality control<br />

suppliers.<br />

These four pr<strong>in</strong>ciples are critical to the <strong>in</strong>tegrated management of<br />

The 1990S have been called the "decade of customer service". All <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

sectors are plac<strong>in</strong>g a premium on quality, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g quality customer service.<br />

Serv<strong>in</strong>g customers as they want to be served and "mak<strong>in</strong>g company easy to do<br />

7


us<strong>in</strong>ess with" is competitive objective for the next millennium. At the same time<br />

the mean<strong>in</strong>g of effective customer service is chang<strong>in</strong>g, and companies must meet<br />

an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly higher standard. Customer Service Pyramid is an effective<br />

framework for formulat<strong>in</strong>g a customer service strategy <strong>in</strong> a fluid market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environment.<br />

1.3.1 Logistics as a Process<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Prof. Bernard La Londe of Ohio State University[1998],<br />

logistics is not a focused functional activity but one that enables the <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />

activities across functions. An effective way to promote this expanded role for<br />

logistics is to position logistics as a process, not as an activity or function. These<br />

are three important sub-processes as part of the logistic process. They are:<br />

• Integrated Production and distribution strategy development<br />

• The replenishment process<br />

• The order management process<br />

A well-designed forecast<strong>in</strong>g system can contribute significantly to logistic<br />

performance. Many consumer products companies are try<strong>in</strong>g to operate with a<br />

25 to 60 per cent forecast error (on the stock-keep<strong>in</strong>g unit level) <strong>in</strong> their one­<br />

month- out forecasts. This error range wreaks havoc with <strong>in</strong>ventory levels and<br />

customer service performance. "Best Practice" companies, on the other hand,<br />

consistentlyare able to achieve 15 to 20 percent forecast error rates. Companies<br />

that perform poorly <strong>in</strong> their forecast<strong>in</strong>g typically commit two or more of the "Six<br />

offorecast<strong>in</strong>g" given below:<br />

• Lett<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ances drive forecasts<br />

• Hav<strong>in</strong>gno forecast "owner"<br />

• Hav<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>sufficient analytical support<br />

• Us<strong>in</strong>ga s<strong>in</strong>gle forecast<strong>in</strong>g approach for every th<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Hav<strong>in</strong>g no sales and operations plann<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Fail<strong>in</strong>gto track forecast error.<br />

8


Many companies are discover<strong>in</strong>g that distribution resource plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(DRP) systems can reduce costs, improve customer service, and better their<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory management. DRP systems provide a full view <strong>in</strong>to the warehouse<br />

network by first exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g demand at the end of the channel and accumulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

requirements back through the warehouse network. This approach allows for full<br />

visibility of needs and better management of <strong>in</strong>ventories. DRP <strong>in</strong>volves both<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory management and distribution plann<strong>in</strong>g. A module of distribution<br />

requirement plann<strong>in</strong>g (DRP) extends the concepts of materials requirements<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> to a multi-echelon-warehouse <strong>in</strong>ventory environment. The results are<br />

time-phased replenishment schedules for mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventories across the<br />

warehous<strong>in</strong>g network. DRP offers an accurate simulation of distribution<br />

operations with extended plann<strong>in</strong>g visibility, allow<strong>in</strong>g logistics departments to<br />

manage all resources better.<br />

1.4 Literature on Importance of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

The last decade of this century has seen many significant changes. The<br />

important ones are: the end of cold war, break<strong>in</strong>g up of the former USSR,<br />

formation of trade blocks (EU, ASEAN, NAFfA, etc.), emergence of World Trade<br />

Organization, and globalization of World Economy. Feasibility of global soure<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and market<strong>in</strong>g of quality products and services at competitive prices <strong>in</strong> the world<br />

market have called for serious re-look <strong>in</strong>to the logistics functions <strong>in</strong> such<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries as steel, cement, fertilizer, chemicals, petroleum, etc., where logistics<br />

cost forms a significant component of the cost of goods sold. Gyula et. al.[1994]<br />

and Scully and Fawcett[1993] givesdetails on global manufactur<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Based on a survey of 1000 major European companies, KearneY[199S]<br />

observes that logistics function is becom<strong>in</strong>g more demand<strong>in</strong>g and complex as the<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment itself is becom<strong>in</strong>g complex and demand<strong>in</strong>g. The critical<br />

factors responsible for demand<strong>in</strong>g logistics management are: (1) Escalat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

customer expectations and demand, (2) Cycle time compression, (3) Global<br />

soure<strong>in</strong>g, (4) Global market, (5) Corporate restructur<strong>in</strong>g, (6) <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

partnership, (7) Productivity pressures and (8) Environment awareness. In-spite<br />

of the above challenges, revolutions <strong>in</strong> communication and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

9


+- INFORMATION FLOW ....<br />

+- ....::MONEYFLOW<br />

MATERIAL FLOW.... ---+<br />

Raw material<br />

Production<br />

Raw Material<br />

Storage<br />

Figure 1.2 Three important flows <strong>in</strong> asupply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Production Distribution Customer<br />

Uses<br />

Though supply cha<strong>in</strong>s have existence s<strong>in</strong>ce the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of civilization,<br />

thisname and associated approach to look<strong>in</strong>g at the issue is new. The focus so far<br />

<strong>in</strong> the area has been to look at different aspects of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> such as<br />

procurement, storage, production, distribution etc, separately and there are<br />

different specialists for each. An <strong>in</strong>tegrated view of the l<strong>in</strong>ks as parts of a supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> is of quite recent orig<strong>in</strong>. Therefore, when one changes the focus from<br />

different functional areas to the supply cha<strong>in</strong> concept, some fundamental issues<br />

arise that need to be addressed.<br />

The entities of the cha<strong>in</strong> or the departments of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> become<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant and try to form sub-goals and achieve them at the expense of the total<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> goal. Different entities <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> have different strength.<br />

This leads to a condition that the cha<strong>in</strong> is only as strong as the weakest l<strong>in</strong>k. The<br />

extra money spent <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g some areas of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> very strong is<br />

wasted because this extra strength does not <strong>in</strong> practice contribute to the<br />

operation of the total supply cha<strong>in</strong> significantly. In a cha<strong>in</strong> if two adjacent r<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

arenot connected the cha<strong>in</strong> is not one but two. The same is the case with the case<br />

ofa supplycha<strong>in</strong> where strong connections between adjacent l<strong>in</strong>ks are vital for its<br />

existence and function<strong>in</strong>g. These are called supply cha<strong>in</strong> disconnects. The<br />

presence of a loop or a cross-l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> creates multiple paths to<br />

choose from one end of the cha<strong>in</strong> to another. At each such loop or cross-l<strong>in</strong>k the<br />

conditions under which each path should be taken should be spelt out clearly.<br />

11


Loop<strong>in</strong>g and cross l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of supply cha<strong>in</strong>s create many <strong>in</strong>formation flow<br />

problems, <strong>in</strong>formation about the same th<strong>in</strong>g com<strong>in</strong>g from different l<strong>in</strong>ks might<br />

not be at agreement. It has been found that <strong>in</strong> most supply cha<strong>in</strong>s there are<br />

people to study and look at the <strong>in</strong>dividual departments, because of the<br />

organizational structure followed, but almost no one looks at the supply cha<strong>in</strong> as<br />

such<strong>in</strong> total. Itis the performance of this complete cha<strong>in</strong> that ultimately matters.<br />

1.6 This study and its objectives<br />

This study was started <strong>in</strong> September 1998, at the time of dismantl<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism (APM) <strong>in</strong> India. The objectives of this study are:<br />

1. Model development for selection of location for ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> India and<br />

identification of characteristics to be looked <strong>in</strong> to when configur<strong>in</strong>g it.<br />

2. To develop models for <strong>in</strong>tegrated supply cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

3. Overall design of a logistic <strong>in</strong>formation system for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

4. To make a detailed study of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> management <strong>in</strong> an <strong>Indian</strong><br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eryand make suggestions for improvement.<br />

1.7 Scheme of the Study<br />

This thesis is organized under seven chapters. In the second chapter<br />

presents a survey of literature relevant to the study. The third Chapter discusses<br />

world petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>Indian</strong> petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry along with the model to<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d out the location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery and the importance of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g flexibility<br />

<strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The fourth chapter deals with models for supply cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g for a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The fifth chapter is dedicated to the <strong>in</strong>formation flow <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound<br />

logistics, <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics, and external logistics. Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Ltd. and<br />

strategies for its long-term supply cha<strong>in</strong> improvement form the ground of the<br />

sixth chapter. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from the data collected and recommendations related<br />

to this area are presented <strong>in</strong> this chapter. In the last chapter presents the<br />

summaryof f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and recommendations, and discuss scope for further related<br />

work.<br />

12


2.1 Introduction<br />

CH A PT ER II<br />

Review ofLiterature<br />

In this chapter, a review of literature is carried out. Theoretical concepts <strong>in</strong><br />

the area of SCM are reviewed. SCM be<strong>in</strong>g a practice-dom<strong>in</strong>ated area, SCM<br />

practices <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, reported <strong>in</strong> the literature is reviewed. S<strong>in</strong>ce this work<br />

focuses on petroleum oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery, logisticsliterature <strong>in</strong> this area is also presented.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce supply cha<strong>in</strong> management is broad area, for clarity of presentation, we have<br />

divided the literature <strong>in</strong> to n<strong>in</strong>e section cover<strong>in</strong>g areas such as location, flexibility,<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g, etc. Application of Information Technology and its advantages are<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />

Theoretical literature is reviewed first to get a strong foundation on<br />

concepts. Application of those theories <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial environment is analyzed<br />

next. Industrial applications are divided <strong>in</strong> to service and manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector.<br />

Literature on manufactur<strong>in</strong>g is aga<strong>in</strong> sub-divided <strong>in</strong> to discrete and cont<strong>in</strong>uous.<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of petroleum products literature is reviewed towards the end <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

sections discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />

2.2 Concept of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management literature offers many variations on the same<br />

theme when def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a supply cha<strong>in</strong>. The most common def<strong>in</strong>itions [See for<br />

example, Jones and Riley [1984], Houlihan [1985], Stevens [1989], Scott and<br />

Westbook [1991], Lee and Bill<strong>in</strong>gton [1993], and Lamm<strong>in</strong>g [1996]] are a system<br />

of suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and customers where<br />

materials flow down stream from suppliers to customers and <strong>in</strong>formation flows<br />

to <strong>in</strong> both directions. Ma<strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of a supply cha<strong>in</strong> is from Stevens [1989]<br />

who def<strong>in</strong>es it as:<br />

"A connected series of activities which is concerned with plann<strong>in</strong>g, eo­<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g, and controll<strong>in</strong>g material, parts, and f<strong>in</strong>ished goods from supplier to<br />

13


customer. It is concerned with two dist<strong>in</strong>ct flows (material and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

through the organization)"<br />

Oliverand Webber [1192] state that the supply cha<strong>in</strong> should be viewed as a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle entity that is "guided by strategic decision mak<strong>in</strong>g". Gentry [1996]<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded the carriers <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. O'Brien and Head [1995] <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

governments as part of the cha<strong>in</strong>. Manag<strong>in</strong>g the supply cha<strong>in</strong> would <strong>in</strong>clude all<br />

the issues associated with the government regulations and customs. Towill [1997]<br />

argues that the def<strong>in</strong>ition needs to be flexible. Houlihanliobg] is credited with<br />

co<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the term supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Cooper, Ellram, Gardner, and Hanks [1997]<br />

suggest that the span of management control should be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the added<br />

value of any relationship to the firm. Houlihan [1985] makes it clear that the<br />

differentiat<strong>in</strong>g factor between the <strong>in</strong>tegrated logistics and supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

management is the strategic decision mak<strong>in</strong>g as part of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

management.<br />

2.3 Evolution of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

The literature suggests that SCM has its roots <strong>in</strong> the evolutionary path<br />

followed through materials management and physical distribution after the<br />

Second World War, functional logistics (different managers for each functions)<br />

and <strong>in</strong>tegrated logistics (one manager for all functions). Forrester [1958]justifies<br />

the first step beyond functional logistics by us<strong>in</strong>g a systems analysis approach.<br />

Bowersox [1969] discussed the evolution of <strong>in</strong>tegrated logistics. Theoretically<br />

development of SCM has different stages. Langley [1992] suggests four stages of<br />

development. (1) Cost control, (2) profit centers orientation recogniz<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

positive impact on sales, (3) view of supply cha<strong>in</strong> as key to product<br />

differentiation, and (4) as a pr<strong>in</strong>cipal strategic advantage. Masters and Pohlen<br />

[1994] describe the evolution of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> to three phases. (1) Functional<br />

<strong>Management</strong> [1960-1970]-functions such as purchas<strong>in</strong>g, shipp<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

distribution, each managed separately. (2) Internal <strong>in</strong>tegration [1980s]- the<br />

management of such supply cha<strong>in</strong> functions of a s<strong>in</strong>gle facility is identified and<br />

becomes the responsibility of a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>dividual, and (3) external <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

[1990s]-the management of supply cha<strong>in</strong> functions throughout the cha<strong>in</strong>. La<br />

14


Londe [1994] describes the evolution of <strong>in</strong>tegrated supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> three phases.<br />

(1) Physicaldistribution - distribution of goods is all that needs to be managed by<br />

a logistics manager. (2) Internal l<strong>in</strong>kages-it is important for the logistics manager<br />

to control both <strong>in</strong>ternal supply functions and physical distribution. (3) External<br />

l<strong>in</strong>kages- logistics management requires co-operation <strong>in</strong> the management with<br />

upstream and down stream entitles <strong>in</strong> order to maximize the benefits of the total<br />

logistic system.<br />

Industrial application of supply cha<strong>in</strong> pioneered the concept of (1)­<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated logistics that eventually came to be called SCM (Bowersox [1969],<br />

Slater [1976]), and (2) partnership lend<strong>in</strong>g and management [Slater [1976],<br />

Gentry [1996], and Walton [1996]]. Forrester [1958] predicated that the<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction of computer and the adoption of many mathematical models and<br />

other optimization tools had a great impact upon the development on supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>. In 1960'S, Bowersox [1969] notes that computers emerged from their<br />

<strong>in</strong>fancy and formed application <strong>in</strong> physical distribution. Slater [1976] argues that<br />

a total systems approach to the logistics channel will reduce total cost and<br />

considerably improve the overall quality of the operations. Fuller [1993] states<br />

"logistics has the potential to become the next govern<strong>in</strong>g element of strategy as<br />

an<strong>in</strong>ventive way of creat<strong>in</strong>g value for customers, an immediate source of sav<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

a discipl<strong>in</strong>e on market<strong>in</strong>g, and a critical extension of production flexibility".<br />

Materials<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

[1960s]<br />

Distribution<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

[1970s]<br />

Logistics<br />

management<br />

[early 1980s]<br />

Integrated logistic<br />

management<br />

[late 1980s]<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

management<br />

[1990s]<br />

In the last two decades, logistics slowly evolved <strong>in</strong> to SCM. Houlihan<br />

[1988], Copan<strong>in</strong>o and Rosefield [1992], Lee and Bill<strong>in</strong>gton [1993], Fuller [1993],<br />

Thomas and Griff<strong>in</strong> [1996], Gattorna [1998] and Mitra and chatterjee [2001]<br />

have tried to account for the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g awareness and implementation of SCM.<br />

To have maximum benefit, the supply cha<strong>in</strong> must be managed as a s<strong>in</strong>gle entity.<br />

15


Firms must avoid sub-optimization through self-<strong>in</strong>terest at any l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> the cha<strong>in</strong><br />

bymanag<strong>in</strong>g the entire cha<strong>in</strong> as a s<strong>in</strong>gle entity while simultaneously deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

the power relationship that are <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> the cha<strong>in</strong>s. Baganha and Cohen<br />

[1998] po<strong>in</strong>t out that application of the variability of demand <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

has been recognized and described. Bhaskaran [1996] notes that manufactures<br />

have recognized the need to optimize the performance of the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

connect<strong>in</strong>g raw material to the f<strong>in</strong>ished product. Gavirneni, Kapusc<strong>in</strong>ski, and<br />

Tayur [1998] note that the focus of manag<strong>in</strong>g the supply cha<strong>in</strong> has led to radical<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about supplier/customer relations.<br />

Stevens [1998] suggested that <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the cha<strong>in</strong> elements has to be<br />

done for the improvement <strong>in</strong> SCM performance. Stock and Lambert [1992]<br />

observed that to become a world-class company, a company must focus on<br />

logistic <strong>in</strong>tegration. Bowersox and Daugherty [1995] identified that logistic<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration will be possible by the development <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation technology<br />

Cooper, et al. [1997] made it clear that SCM is not the <strong>in</strong>tegration of logistics<br />

alone, it is the total <strong>in</strong>tegration from vendor to customer. Kopicki [1999]<br />

identified that develop<strong>in</strong>g countries are <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> to compete <strong>in</strong><br />

the world-class market<strong>in</strong>g. Sahay [2001] suggests that manag<strong>in</strong>g supply cha<strong>in</strong> is<br />

the onlywayto meet the global challenges. Paul, et al. [1998] identify the changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition, growth and approaches. It is noted that <strong>in</strong>tegration us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation technology and strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g are areas of focus now. Gilmour<br />

[1999] made some efforts to benchmark supply cha<strong>in</strong> operations. Bench mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />

SC operations is useful <strong>in</strong> performance improvement.<br />

From the above literature review it is clear that SCM focus <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery is a<br />

pert<strong>in</strong>ent research problem. It is also clear that an <strong>in</strong>tegrated supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

approach and use of <strong>in</strong>formation technology should be taken <strong>in</strong> SCM studies.<br />

2.4 Location for a New Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g the size and location of facilities are traditional problems. It has<br />

beenestablishedtheoretically the importance of location for <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> the SCM<br />

context. Weber [1922], Beckman [1968], and Drezner [1995] have addressed the<br />

problem by apply<strong>in</strong>g the methods of operations research. Hall [1987], and<br />

16


Daganzo [1996] have tried to solve the location of transportation term<strong>in</strong>als as an<br />

optimization problem. Compbell [1990] developed a cont<strong>in</strong>uous approximation<br />

modelfor relocat<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>als to serve expand<strong>in</strong>g demand. Noritake and Kimura<br />

[1990] developed models to be identified with the optimal size and location of a<br />

seaport us<strong>in</strong>g separable programm<strong>in</strong>g technique. Eichi Taniguehi et al. [1999]<br />

suggestsa mathematical model for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the optimal size and location of a<br />

logistics term<strong>in</strong>al. Ganeshan and Terry [2001] suggest that there are four<br />

decision areas <strong>in</strong> SCM (1) Location (2) Production (3) Inventory (4)<br />

Transportation. Ioannis et al. [2000] make an analysis on support<strong>in</strong>g decision<br />

makers <strong>in</strong> land use plann<strong>in</strong>g around chemical sites. M<strong>in</strong> and Melachr<strong>in</strong>oudis<br />

[1999] analyze the relocation problems of a distribution facility and Papazolon et<br />

al. [1999] discuss the risk <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> land use plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Kuehn, et al. [1963] have used a heuristic programme for locat<strong>in</strong>g a warehouse.<br />

Geoffro<strong>in</strong> & Arthur [1976] predict the scope of computer application <strong>in</strong> selection<br />

of location. Hamel, et al. [1985] po<strong>in</strong>t out the importance of location when a<br />

company is plann<strong>in</strong>g for global market<strong>in</strong>g. Khumawala, et al. [1971] made a<br />

comparison of some warehouse location techniques. Klassen, et al. [1994] have<br />

identified the barriers <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational operations. They have identified location<br />

of the plant as one of the major bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> global market<strong>in</strong>g. Fordows &<br />

Kasra [1997] suggest to f<strong>in</strong>d the location correctly for foreign companies.<br />

Agost<strong>in</strong>o Villa [2001] <strong>in</strong>troduces some SCM problems. Importance of location is<br />

stressed <strong>in</strong> this article. Mac Cormek, et al. [1994] note the new dynamics of<br />

Global manufactur<strong>in</strong>g site location. Porter [1990] suggests the competitive<br />

advantage of nations <strong>in</strong> the location selection especially for cont<strong>in</strong>uos<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. Nation must be selected on the basis of target market. Lee &<br />

Larry [2002] note that the term globalization describes bus<strong>in</strong>ess deployment of<br />

facilities and operations around the world. Globalization results <strong>in</strong> more exports<br />

and imports. East Asia has become the fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g and foremost trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regions <strong>in</strong> the world. They have identified six groups of factors, which dom<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

location decisionfor a new plant. Location selection is a very vital decision, which<br />

haslong-term implication. This strategic decision is not easy to solve because (1)<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of future (2) complexity and conflict<strong>in</strong>g factors associated with the<br />

17


site selection problem, and (3) constra<strong>in</strong>ts and limitation of resources to produce<br />

site. Pair wise compassion of factors gives fairly good results for site selection.<br />

Literature shows that the location for ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be first selected on a<br />

global basis due to the global competition. When look<strong>in</strong>g on the global basis, it<br />

will come to a country to setup a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The selection of country can be solved<br />

as a non numeric problem. Selection of the country can be followed by state<br />

selection and location selection. This can be solved with composite method.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al site selection can be made with the help of numerical solution. So the<br />

selection of locations for a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery is possible with the <strong>in</strong>tegration of both<br />

quantitative and qualitative techniques. Selection of site for production setup is<br />

complexwhen compared to the selection of location for a warehouse. Warehouse<br />

problems can be solved with operations research or techniques. But<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g location selection can not be solved with the help of techniques<br />

alone. Composite techniques are ideal for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out suitable location for a<br />

process<strong>in</strong>dustry like ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

2.5 Flexibility of Resources<br />

Theoretically flexibility is more important for <strong>in</strong>dustry with cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

production. Lee and Larry [2002] say that manufactur<strong>in</strong>g process that can be<br />

changed easily to handle various products is flexibility. The ability to<br />

reprogramme process is useful for high customization. Nemetz and Fry [1998]<br />

describe the characteristics of a flexible manufactur<strong>in</strong>g organization. Eric and<br />

Amitabh [2002] discuss the sources of volume flexibility and their impact on<br />

performance. The <strong>in</strong>ventory will be m<strong>in</strong>imum if the organization can control the<br />

volume at sources itself. Cox Jt. [1989] suggests methods for measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

flexibility <strong>in</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. This method will give an idea how flexible is the<br />

organization. George [1994] and De Toni and Tonchia [1998] discuss the<br />

advantages of flexibility <strong>in</strong> production process and the organizations with<br />

flexibility <strong>in</strong> the competitive market environment. Fiegenbaum & Karnani [1991]<br />

studied the competitive advantage for an organization with flexibility <strong>in</strong> output.<br />

Product range can be maximum so it will satisfy more customers. Savoie [1998]<br />

describes flexibility as the last word on supply cha<strong>in</strong> improvement. He suggests<br />

18


that only flexibility can improve a well perform<strong>in</strong>g organization. Huchzermeier<br />

and Cohen [1998] prove that exchange rate value change risk can be m<strong>in</strong>imized<br />

by operational flexibility. This is more useful for organizations, which are<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the export market<strong>in</strong>g. Eric and Amitabh [2002] establish the drivers<br />

and sources of volume flexibility. They argue that short and long-term sources of<br />

volume flexibility have a positive, albeit differential impact on a firm's<br />

performance. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery has less resources flexibility because it is a process<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry. Identify<strong>in</strong>g flexibility resources will give performance ga<strong>in</strong> for a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery also.<br />

Flexibilityis needed for projects with long life. Short life projects need not<br />

have flexibility because the project will be completed before any significant<br />

change <strong>in</strong> technology occurs <strong>in</strong> market or resources. Projects with longer life are<br />

proneto undergo changes <strong>in</strong> all areas, so there must be provision for adoption of<br />

changes. Flexibility must be <strong>in</strong>corporated at the time of design and<br />

implementation itself. A process <strong>in</strong>dustry like ref<strong>in</strong>ery exists for quite a long<br />

period and a lot of changes will take place <strong>in</strong> the field of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. So a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

must identify the areas where they have to be flexible to rema<strong>in</strong> competitive <strong>in</strong><br />

the market.<br />

2.6 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g for all organizations <strong>in</strong>cludes both long term and short term to<br />

have better performance. Plann<strong>in</strong>g can be divided <strong>in</strong>to strategic and short term.<br />

Literature on both the types is sufficient to have good idea on plann<strong>in</strong>g. Kogut<br />

[1985] gives an idea how to design a global strategy to have a comparative and<br />

competitive value added cha<strong>in</strong>s. Tyndall [2000] discusses the global challenges<br />

<strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Lambert, et al. [1998] have discussed on the issues on<br />

implementation of SCM. Bnges [1998] & Evans, et al. [1995] suggest steps to<br />

avoid failures <strong>in</strong> SCM. Ganeshan & Terry [2001] and Beth [2000] suggest the<br />

importance of strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g. They also observed that if the marg<strong>in</strong>s are<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g down, look at the performance of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Bridleman, et al. [1997]<br />

note that the situation <strong>in</strong> process <strong>in</strong>dustry and make-to order <strong>in</strong>dustry are<br />

different. Scope for SCM is more <strong>in</strong> process <strong>in</strong>dustry such as petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

19


Eliram, et al. [1990] noticed that the relationship with shipper is important <strong>in</strong><br />

process <strong>in</strong>dustry. Partnership is the most efficient method <strong>in</strong> the third party<br />

logistics. Johnson, et al. [1995] observed that SCM is the best method to ga<strong>in</strong> an<br />

edge over the competitors. Inventory reduction and flexibility are the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

reasons. Lee, et al. [1992] discuss the problems and opportunities associated<br />

with supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory. He has developed a mathematical model for the<br />

reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory. Production, plann<strong>in</strong>g and control us<strong>in</strong>g fitter theory is<br />

done by Towill and Del Vecchio [1994] for supply cha<strong>in</strong> dynamics. The<br />

performance measurement procedure is developed by Beaman [1999]. As per<br />

Jones and Riley [1985] <strong>in</strong>ventory must be used for the competitive advantage<br />

through SCM. Lee and Bill<strong>in</strong>gton [1993] suggest that material management will<br />

becomplex <strong>in</strong> decentralized supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Mathematical model is also developed<br />

for the decentralized supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Lee and Bill<strong>in</strong>gton [1995] high lights the<br />

evolution of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management models and practices <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Bowersox [1997] observed that world class leaders <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry have better control<br />

over their supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Cav<strong>in</strong>ato [1999] developed a cost/value model for supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> competitiveness. Cooper and Eliram [1993], and La Londe [1997]<br />

identified characteristics of SCM and its implications on purchas<strong>in</strong>g and supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> strategy.<br />

2.6.1 Strategic Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The importance of long term purchas<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g is emphasized by Carter<br />

[1996]. Chan & Huff [1997] suggest that the strategy for purchas<strong>in</strong>g must be<br />

focused on customer requirement. Zahra and Cov<strong>in</strong> [1993] have suggested that<br />

purchase strategy must be <strong>in</strong> tune with the policy and performance of the<br />

organization. The importance of knowledge management for develop<strong>in</strong>g strategy<br />

for an organization is discussed by Morten [1999]. Procedure for check<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

performance of strategy is developed by Robert, et al. [2000]. Literature shows<br />

the development and importance of strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> process <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />

Peter and Richard [1976] give guidel<strong>in</strong>es for design<strong>in</strong>g strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />

importance of control of production on the basis of strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

discussed by Burbidge [1984]. Jones and Riley [1985] suggest the use of raw<br />

material <strong>in</strong>ventory for the competitive advantage through SCM. They suggest<br />

20


that the long term plann<strong>in</strong>g will have a better control on the raw material<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory and they add procedures for systematic plann<strong>in</strong>g. Ball<strong>in</strong>t J<strong>in</strong> [1993]<br />

recommends method for optimiz<strong>in</strong>g the level of <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. A<br />

mathematical model was developed for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the solution. Mac Berth and<br />

Ferguson [1991] have identified the strategic aspects of SCM. They have<br />

suggested that hav<strong>in</strong>g a strategy for the purchase as well production and<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g will improve competitiveness. Porter [1996] clearly def<strong>in</strong>es strategy as<br />

the long term plann<strong>in</strong>g for an organization. The length of plan period must be<br />

divided depend<strong>in</strong>g on the nature of bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Andrew & Alexander [1997]<br />

suggest the precautions to be taken <strong>in</strong> strategy. Ifproper plann<strong>in</strong>g is not there for<br />

short period, then the strategy will fail. Hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g is important for<br />

the best performance of the organization, Pagh and Cooper [1998] discuss the<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> postponement and speculation management. They are suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that the f<strong>in</strong>al decision on the product must be delayed as much as possible to<br />

have better customer satisfaction. Tyndall, et al. [1998] suggest methods for<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the value through global operation. Miller [1998] suggested methods<br />

for mak<strong>in</strong>g strategy and structure. Fredric [1986] suggests methods for strategic<br />

decision for develop<strong>in</strong>g organization structure. He suggests the need for a<br />

designed <strong>in</strong>frastructure for the development of an organization with strategic<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g. Morash, et al. [1996] suggest that long term plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> logistics<br />

capabilities is essential for competitive advantage and success of the<br />

organization. Sahay, et al. [2001] also suggests that to meet global challenges<br />

long term plann<strong>in</strong>g is essential through out the cha<strong>in</strong>. Harwick and Tom [1997]<br />

thought on optimum decision mak<strong>in</strong>g for the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Optimum decision <strong>in</strong><br />

logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g is essential for the global competition. Porter [1980] developed<br />

a competitive strategy for analyz<strong>in</strong>g the performance of an <strong>in</strong>dustry. Oral and<br />

Dom<strong>in</strong>ique [1989] make an analytical approach to competitive strategy<br />

formulation for an <strong>in</strong>dustry. Young [1991] suggested that manufactur<strong>in</strong>g must be<br />

given moreimportance <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g strategy.<br />

Miller [1992] warned about the strategy trap. Keep<strong>in</strong>g the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

top management is taken as the trap. Pelham& Plarris [1996] see the future for<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries lie <strong>in</strong> the strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g for operation and control. Chow, et al.<br />

21


[1995] developed a framework for logistics frame work. Integration of logistics<br />

with strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g is the objective. Theodure, et al. [1998] suggest that<br />

logistic strategy is at a cross road now. Integration must be considered for<br />

strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g. La Londe and Masters [1994] suggest that strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for logistics is the blue pr<strong>in</strong>t for success <strong>in</strong> the next century. Process <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

like ref<strong>in</strong>ery need long-term plann<strong>in</strong>g for the existence <strong>in</strong> the competitive global<br />

market. Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g is essential to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the correct sequence of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation flow for decision tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

2.6.2 Hierarchical Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Theoretically hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g is required for a process <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Some of the decisions must be strategic where as some other decisions must be<br />

daily. The plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure also must be different. Hans and Wolfgang [1992]<br />

suggest the importance of strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g. They are claim<strong>in</strong>g that to have<br />

competitive advantage an organization must plan for develop<strong>in</strong>g edge over<br />

others. Managers do short term plann<strong>in</strong>g. Importance of supply cha<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

model development is discussed by Fisher [1997]. He suggests that each <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

must have its own unique model. Raghuram [1999] suggests that there must be<br />

specially designed long term plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure for each organization. Focus<br />

required <strong>in</strong> purchase is discussed by Murray [1998]. Miller [2001] stresses the<br />

importance of hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> management. Hartveld<br />

[1996] discusses the hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g importance for a chemical <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Haulilan [1985] also suggests the importance of hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g importance<br />

for <strong>in</strong>ternational market<strong>in</strong>g. Bechtel [1993] gives the use process <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g system for the efficiency improvement of plann<strong>in</strong>g department. P<strong>in</strong>to,<br />

et al. [2000] have developed a plann<strong>in</strong>g and schedul<strong>in</strong>g model for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Firstly, the development of a non-l<strong>in</strong>ear plann<strong>in</strong>g model for ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

production is presented. The model is able to represent a general ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

topology and allows the implementation of non-l<strong>in</strong>ear process models as well as<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g relations. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the market limitations for each oil derivative<br />

usually supplied by the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the optimization model is able to def<strong>in</strong>e new<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts, thus <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the production of more valuable products while<br />

22


satisfy<strong>in</strong>g all specification constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Real-world applications are developed for<br />

the plann<strong>in</strong>g of diesel production <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> Brazil. The second part of the<br />

work addresses schedul<strong>in</strong>g problem <strong>in</strong> oil ref<strong>in</strong>eries with mixed <strong>in</strong>teger<br />

optimization models and rely both cont<strong>in</strong>uous and discrete events<br />

representations. The paper also discusses the development and selection of<br />

optimization models for short-term schedul<strong>in</strong>g of a set of operations that<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes, product receiv<strong>in</strong>g from process units, storage and <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

management <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediate tanks, blend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to atta<strong>in</strong> oil specifications<br />

and demands, and transport sequenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> oil pipel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

2.7 Integration of Operations<br />

Optimization at different levels is common In all <strong>in</strong>dustries. In<br />

production a lot of researches have been tak<strong>in</strong>g place. Some literature is<br />

available on <strong>in</strong>bound logistics and more work has been carried out <strong>in</strong> outbound<br />

logistics. Stevens [1986] presents the importance of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

He suggests that total <strong>in</strong>tegration alone will improve the performance. Lambert,<br />

et al. [1979] notes the appraisal of the <strong>in</strong>tegrated physical distribution. Total<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration is not covered <strong>in</strong> this paper but importance of physical distribution is<br />

discussed. Towill [1991] discusses the dynamics of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. In his paper the<br />

importance of <strong>in</strong>bound logistics is discussed. Stevens [1989] and Stevens, et al.<br />

[1989] suggest <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g from supplier to the end customer. Use of decision<br />

models are also discussed <strong>in</strong> this paper. Dieasli [1984] discusses the importance<br />

and application of functional <strong>in</strong>tegration. Back, et al. [1996] compared the<br />

performance and procedure of reeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g with SCM. Bell & Stukhast [1986]<br />

studied and identified the attributes of material management.<br />

Ross and David [1996] identify the ma<strong>in</strong> challenge of SCM for<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration. Wu, et al. [1999] suggests the special issue of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

management <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegration of operations. Gattorana [1998] suggests that<br />

alignment of operations is the key activity for the success of SCM. Gattora, et al.<br />

[1991] observed that reduc<strong>in</strong>g complexity <strong>in</strong> the logistics operation is important<br />

for the effective implementation of SCM. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton [1995] suggested the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration procedure for plann<strong>in</strong>g, schedul<strong>in</strong>g, and control. Barney [1991]<br />

23


identified the importance of resource identification to have competitive<br />

advantage <strong>in</strong> the market. Bowersox [1997] states the importance of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the operations of an organization. Integration, to the customer side and supplier<br />

side is discussed. Amundson [1998] suggests the importance of theory driven<br />

researches <strong>in</strong> the field of SCM. In his paper it is noted that the application of<br />

research can be made only by <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the results. Patterson [1999] discusses<br />

decision<strong>in</strong>tegration between manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and market<strong>in</strong>g/sales and Scott, et al.<br />

[2002] compare that with orig<strong>in</strong>al performance to establish the benefits of<br />

decision <strong>in</strong>tegration. Lenz [1981] identified <strong>in</strong>tegration as one of the<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ants of organizational performance for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Stevens [1989] also<br />

suggested that <strong>in</strong>tegration is the only way for improvement of supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Narasimhan and Carter [1998] stress the importance of l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

organization with<strong>in</strong> material sourc<strong>in</strong>g strategies. Wisner and Stanley [1999]<br />

developed an <strong>in</strong>tegration model for <strong>in</strong>ternal relationships and activities<br />

associated with high level of purchas<strong>in</strong>g service quality. Narasimhan & Kim<br />

[2002] studied the effect of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration on the relationship between<br />

diversification and performance. Diversification is easy <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

organization. The performance will be improved by <strong>in</strong>tegration Mohan, et al.<br />

[2000] suggest that E-commerce can be used for <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the customer and<br />

organization. Sahay, et al. [2001] suggest a framework for develop<strong>in</strong>g customer<br />

relationship. Eliram and Cooper [1990] make the po<strong>in</strong>t that develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

partnership with shipper will make the schedul<strong>in</strong>g and movement of materials<br />

more efficient. Lewis and Talalayevsky [1997] add the application of <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

of logistics operations us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology. Lewis, et al. [1997]<br />

suggested an <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach to reeng<strong>in</strong>eer material and supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

control <strong>in</strong> a process <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

2.8 Information Technology<br />

Operations of SCM are widespread. Supplier may be at one place,<br />

operations <strong>in</strong> another place, and market can be <strong>in</strong> the third place. For a company<br />

which is do<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>ternational market<strong>in</strong>g, the market will be at different cont<strong>in</strong>ents.<br />

So the <strong>in</strong>tegration of operation is really complex. Blois [1980] identified the need<br />

24


of <strong>in</strong>formation for orientation of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. The focus is on <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

from market. Balcer and Lipman [1984] suggest the need for technology<br />

adoption <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation gather<strong>in</strong>g. Bro<strong>in</strong>arezyk & Alba [1994] notice the role of<br />

collection of <strong>in</strong>formation from consumers for process plann<strong>in</strong>g. Deveport and<br />

Short [1990] identify the need for redesign<strong>in</strong>g the bus<strong>in</strong>ess process to make use<br />

of the development <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation technology. Jones and Clarke [1990] made<br />

the po<strong>in</strong>t that effectiveness of SCM can be made only through <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

Bowersox and Daugherty [1995] suggest the importance of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> logistics. Stress of the paper is <strong>in</strong>bound and outbound logistic<br />

operations. Petri [1996] suggests a life-cycle approach to automation and<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation management <strong>in</strong> a process <strong>in</strong>dustry. Importance of total <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation systems is established <strong>in</strong> the paper. Elizondo [1996]<br />

emphasizes on the importance of network<strong>in</strong>g firm's knowledge. He suggests that,<br />

the decision must be network based rather than <strong>in</strong>dividual based. Zipk<strong>in</strong> [1999]<br />

suggests to have a co-operative <strong>in</strong>ventory policy through the supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Feitz<strong>in</strong>ger & Leed [1997] report that <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> IT has resulted <strong>in</strong> the<br />

availability of more <strong>in</strong>formation on channel activities to decision makers. Stalk,<br />

et al. [1992] discusses how the distribution centers obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

replacement/delivery decisions. In article Forbes [1997] there are reports that<br />

the distributors can re-route shipments us<strong>in</strong>g IT. Fisher [1997] has identified a<br />

method to check the rightness of a company's supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Mo<strong>in</strong>zadeb &<br />

Aggarwal [1997] have developed an <strong>in</strong>formation based multi echelon <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

system with emergency orders. It also emphasizes the need for network<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

suppliers and customers. Whang [1998] shares his experience of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage is fast movement of material. Bour<br />

Land, et al. [1996] suggest that timely <strong>in</strong>formation reduces <strong>in</strong>ventories. Chen<br />

[1998] saysthat the reorder po<strong>in</strong>t can be lowered by shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation. Lee &<br />

Whang [2002] notice the importance of <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g among partners.<br />

Aviv and Federgruen [1998] recommend the operational benefits of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g and vendor managed <strong>in</strong>ventory programmes. Evans, et al. [1993]<br />

assessed the impact of <strong>in</strong>formation system on the dynamics of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

25


performance and predicted that it will reduce the <strong>in</strong>ventory. L<strong>in</strong> & Shaw [1998]<br />

suggest methods for re-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g the order fulfillment process <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

network. Sr<strong>in</strong>ivasan, et al. [1995] identify that the <strong>in</strong>creased speed of data flow<br />

can be achieved us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology. Gust<strong>in</strong>, et al. [1995] suggested<br />

that the <strong>in</strong>tegration of logistic is achievable with the development <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

flow. Mason Joues and Towill [1998] note that time compression <strong>in</strong> the supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation management is the vital action required for benefit<strong>in</strong>g SCM<br />

performance.<br />

Many organizations have recently recognized that shar<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

with other members <strong>in</strong> their supply cha<strong>in</strong> can lead to significant reduction <strong>in</strong> the<br />

total cost. Gairneni [2002] suggets that <strong>in</strong>formation flow can be used for<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g fixed order<strong>in</strong>g cost. Cochan & Fisher [2002] note that <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

management will be efficient by <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g. Many recent papers study<br />

the direct effect of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g. This l<strong>in</strong>e of research<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes Cachon & Fisher [2000], Xiande, et al. [2002], Mehmet. et al. [2002].<br />

Decter [1997] identified the importance of data acquisition and team build<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />

that paper the importance of team is discussed for the development of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g. Thouemann [2002] identifies the improvement <strong>in</strong> supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> performance by shar<strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>in</strong>formation from the market. Kefeng, et<br />

al. [2001] suggest that <strong>in</strong>formation technology can better co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate the supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>activities. Lode-Li [2002] writes on the importance of <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong> with horizontal competition.<br />

Literature shows that <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g use of Information Technology is the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> reason for the success of SCM. Application of <strong>in</strong>formation technology is<br />

<strong>in</strong>eviTable for any <strong>in</strong>dustry to implement SCM. Information shar<strong>in</strong>g is the<br />

essence of speed of material flow. Literature shows that the shar<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation must go up to the supplier. So that they can also plan their<br />

production and delivery of goods. A model for <strong>in</strong>formation flow is essential to<br />

have efficient function<strong>in</strong>g. Efficiency of the <strong>in</strong>formation flow depends on the<br />

selection oftechnologyand the appropriateness of <strong>in</strong>formation flow model used.<br />

26


2.9 Tools Used <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

SCM <strong>in</strong>tegration has to take place after optimiz<strong>in</strong>g all the elements of SCM<br />

operations. Optimization can be achieved only by the use of tools. Many tools<br />

are available <strong>in</strong> literature and a series of studies are tak<strong>in</strong>g place for develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

new tools. Mohauty & Desutch [2001] emphasize the application of Decision<br />

Support Systems (DSS), and L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g for the successful<br />

implementation of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management.<br />

2.9.1 Decision Support Systems (DSS)<br />

Cox and Adam [1980] developed a DSS for manufactur<strong>in</strong>g resource<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g. Important <strong>in</strong>formation required for the top management for plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is discussed. Vanttee & Wilbrands [1988] developed a DSSfor conta<strong>in</strong>er term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g. Suggestions are given for the utilization of term<strong>in</strong>als. Karacapilids and<br />

Pappis [1997] developed a framework for group DSS by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g artificial<br />

<strong>in</strong>telligence and operations research techniques. A general algorithm for<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g batch operations was developed by Koudili, et al. [1993]. Pasqale<br />

Leguto and R<strong>in</strong>a [2001] developed a DSS for berth plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a port for<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>er term<strong>in</strong>al. They have used discrete event simulation for develop<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

DSS. Yuss and Choi [1999] developed a simulation model for conta<strong>in</strong>er term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

operations. This model optimizes the wait<strong>in</strong>g time of conta<strong>in</strong>ers. A discrete<br />

event simulation is used for the development of DSS. Bhasi and Acharya [1997]<br />

developed a DSS for ship lighter<strong>in</strong>g operations. A discrete event simulation<br />

method is used <strong>in</strong> it. Ronex [1986] developed a ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g for short period.<br />

Ronex [1993] analyzed the ship operation <strong>in</strong> the decade.<br />

Simulation <strong>in</strong> earlier stages were done us<strong>in</strong>g programme written us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Fortran or other general-purpose computer languages. Develop<strong>in</strong>g logic and<br />

cod<strong>in</strong>g was very complex and time consum<strong>in</strong>g and naturally the quality was also<br />

notvery good. Expertise was essential for do<strong>in</strong>g simulation. Packages like GPSS,<br />

SIMAN, SIMFACTORY, EXTEND, etc. came to help <strong>in</strong> the next stage.<br />

Develop<strong>in</strong>g simulation with package was much faster and simple. Still it could<br />

not be used as a general-purpose tool. The development of Object Oriented<br />

Languages made the use of simulation more popular. Speed of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

27


simulation programme reduced drastically because of splitt<strong>in</strong>g of operations to<br />

objects. F<strong>in</strong>ally the development of Agent Based Simulation made the use of<br />

simulation simpler. Agents are developed for do<strong>in</strong>g the simulation.<br />

2.9.2 Optimization Tools.<br />

L<strong>in</strong>ear programm<strong>in</strong>g problems (LPP) are formulated and solved<br />

extensively for process <strong>in</strong>dustry operation. Garrod & Mikkirs [1985] developed<br />

an LPP for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out the optimal ship size for transportation of bulk materials.<br />

Ship size problem was attacked by many people. Some of them are by Janson<br />

and Shmerson [1982], Pope and Talley [1988] and Ronen [1983] who developed<br />

a ship-schedul<strong>in</strong>g model us<strong>in</strong>g LPP. Rub<strong>in</strong> & Wagner [1990] used LPP for fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the shadow prices as tool for managers. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton [1992] used non-l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

optimization for gasol<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g operation. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton & Shobrys [1996]<br />

suggest the application of optimization <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Lee, et al. [1996] used<br />

mixed <strong>in</strong>teger programm<strong>in</strong>g model for ref<strong>in</strong>ery short term schedul<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g. Mansfield, et al. [1993] used <strong>in</strong>teger programm<strong>in</strong>g for gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g optimization. Mora, et al. [1998] developed an optimization model for<br />

production of diesel us<strong>in</strong>g LP. Moro and P<strong>in</strong>to [1998] used mixed <strong>in</strong>teger model<br />

for short-term crude schedul<strong>in</strong>g. P<strong>in</strong>to and Grossmann [1994] used LP for<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g production for multi product plants. P<strong>in</strong>to and Grossmann [1998]<br />

used assignment and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g models for the schedul<strong>in</strong>g of chemical process<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry. Sal<strong>in</strong>idis and Grossman [1991] used MINLP model for multi product<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g. Rigby, et al. [1995] used LP for blend<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ery products. Slah<br />

[1996] developed LPP for crude oil schedul<strong>in</strong>g. He has listed the assumptions<br />

made for develop<strong>in</strong>g the LP. Symonds [1995] has suggested that LP has the<br />

maximum applications for solv<strong>in</strong>g the ref<strong>in</strong>ery problems. Xueya & Sargent<br />

[1996] developed LPP for optimal operation of mixed production facilities.<br />

Gurmani & Tang [199] developed an LPP for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out optimal order<strong>in</strong>g<br />

decisions with uncerta<strong>in</strong> cost and demand forecast updat<strong>in</strong>g. Ravi & Raddy<br />

[1998] developed an operation plann<strong>in</strong>g model for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery us<strong>in</strong>g fuzzy l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

fractional goal programm<strong>in</strong>g. Mand Gothe, et al. [2002] developed production<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g model us<strong>in</strong>g fuzzyl<strong>in</strong>ear fractional goal programm<strong>in</strong>g. Importance of<br />

security analysis is discussed by ward & Wendell [1990] and Jansen, et al. [1997].<br />

28


Jansen warns about the usage of changes. Ifnot carefully done, the variations <strong>in</strong><br />

results will not have any use. Variable selection must be <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with actual<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> the organization. Vehicle schedul<strong>in</strong>g problem was formulated and<br />

solved by Foster and Ryan [1976]. They have used <strong>in</strong>teger-programm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

approach. Li-Hs<strong>in</strong>g Shih [1997] used mixed <strong>in</strong>teger programm<strong>in</strong>g method for<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g coal imports. Efficiency of supply cha<strong>in</strong> vehicle schedul<strong>in</strong>g problem was<br />

formulated and solved by Foster & Ryan [1976]. They have used <strong>in</strong>teger­<br />

programm<strong>in</strong>g approach.<br />

2.9.3 Demand Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Methods<br />

Demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g has history of long stand<strong>in</strong>g. All types of <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

needs demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g for the material flow as well cash flow control.<br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g demand for the products of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is a similar problem when<br />

compared with other <strong>in</strong>dustries. Li-Hs<strong>in</strong>g Slil [1997] used mixed <strong>in</strong>teger<br />

programm<strong>in</strong>g method for plann<strong>in</strong>g coal imports that has a bear<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

correctness of demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Battachargee [1998] noticed the importance<br />

of demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g and claims that it is the major bottleneck <strong>in</strong> world class<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g. Laugly & Halcomb [1992] suggest that the customer value of the<br />

product decides the demand. Masscustomization is discussed <strong>in</strong> the paper.<br />

Mentzer [1993] identified the importance of outbound channel management for<br />

better demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g. M<strong>in</strong> & Mentzer [2000] emphasis the role of<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> performance. Marien [2000] identifies demand<br />

forecast<strong>in</strong>g as one of the major supply cha<strong>in</strong> enablers. Muller [1991] discusses on<br />

competitive advantage through customer satisfaction for SCM. Lee, et al. [1997]<br />

suggests that the distortion <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation as it passes up the supply cha<strong>in</strong> is the<br />

reason for bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> the demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Melters [1997] has<br />

quantified the bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. It is also mentioned that it can be<br />

reduced by proper data collection. Federgruen and Zipk<strong>in</strong> [1989] <strong>in</strong>troduced an<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory model, with limited production capacity. Lee, et al. [1997] studied the<br />

bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> and found that bullwhip effect is the most<br />

important limit<strong>in</strong>g factor <strong>in</strong> the performance of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Clen, et al. [2000]<br />

have quantified the bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong>. The impact on forecast<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

lead-time, and <strong>in</strong>formation are discussed <strong>in</strong> the paper.<br />

29


Models are established with the help of case studies. Case studies provide<br />

data for check<strong>in</strong>g the models developed. Eisenhurt [1989] did <strong>in</strong> the other way<br />

also. He was establish<strong>in</strong>g that theories could be build from case studies. Stuart,<br />

et al. [1998] make po<strong>in</strong>t that case studies leverage the understand<strong>in</strong>g. Meredith<br />

[1998] also suggested that theory with case study makes better understand<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the theory. Thomas & Yunsook [2002] developed the structure of supply<br />

network. It was established with the case of Honda. They compared these cases<br />

to establish the importance of supply network [outbound logistics]. Lamm<strong>in</strong>g, et<br />

al. [2002] did an <strong>in</strong>itial classification of supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> to, <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and<br />

outbound logistics. It was established <strong>in</strong> a case study.<br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g is the first major activity <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g. It <strong>in</strong>volves careful<br />

study of past data and present scenario. The ma<strong>in</strong> purpose of forecast<strong>in</strong>g is to<br />

estimate the occurrence, tim<strong>in</strong>g or magnitude of future event. If the required<br />

level of accuracy for the forecast is less, then prediction is on the basis of past<br />

data and experience. It is not based on any analysis. To know the future demand<br />

on the basis of the demand <strong>in</strong> the past, extrapolation method can be used. The<br />

demand is forecast on the basis of data collected <strong>in</strong> the past. Volume of data is<br />

depended on the policy of forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Morphological analysis can be done for<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out the consumption of petrol or diesel per head <strong>in</strong> a state or district.<br />

Literature shows that forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods must be used for demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Trend analysis is one of the commonly used methods for demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />

process <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

2.10 Conclusion<br />

Some of the major contributions to the exist<strong>in</strong>g vast literature <strong>in</strong> SCM are<br />

briefly reviewed. The literature survey was started with review of literature on<br />

concepts, def<strong>in</strong>ition and evolution of SCM. From the above literature survey it<br />

was seen that as time passed, researches have been widen<strong>in</strong>g the scope of SCM to<br />

the present status where it covers plann<strong>in</strong>g, coord<strong>in</strong>ation, controll<strong>in</strong>g, materials,<br />

parts, and f<strong>in</strong>ished goods from orig<strong>in</strong>al supplier to f<strong>in</strong>al customer focuss<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

material and <strong>in</strong>formation flows, guided by strategic decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />

literature reviewbrought out the importance of study of <strong>in</strong>tegrated SCM us<strong>in</strong>g IT.<br />

30


The literature review on sub problem related to supply cha<strong>in</strong> such as location<br />

selection, operational flexibility, strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g, hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g has<br />

established their importance <strong>in</strong> the case of petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>ery SCM. The<br />

importance of <strong>in</strong>tegration of operations and use of <strong>in</strong>formation technology to do<br />

the same was also seen <strong>in</strong> literature. SCM <strong>in</strong>tegration has to take place by<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the optimum perform<strong>in</strong>g sub elements. Optimization and decision<br />

support systems tools used were reviewed. It was seen that mathematical<br />

programm<strong>in</strong>g tools are more popular <strong>in</strong> structured small size problems. Fussy<br />

logic methods are also popular; simulation models are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong><br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> systems. Demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods were reviewed and the<br />

problem caused by bullwhip effect <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>s was found to be an important<br />

limit<strong>in</strong>g factor for forecast<strong>in</strong>g systems. Morphological analysis was seen to be<br />

another approach that could be used for product demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g for a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eryfor long term.<br />

It was seen that different aspects of SCM <strong>in</strong> general and certa<strong>in</strong> SCM<br />

functions of petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> particular have been studied by researchers. A<br />

vide verity of tools have been used to solve the problems. The studies focussed on<br />

optimiz<strong>in</strong>g sub processes of the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Integration of the complete supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> was not to be found. This presents opportunity for work on develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegratedsupply cha<strong>in</strong> for ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

31


3.1 Introduction<br />

CH APT ER III<br />

Model for Selection of<br />

New Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Location<br />

Crude oil, available <strong>in</strong> a few parts of the world, is be<strong>in</strong>g used all over the<br />

world. Production of crude oil depends on demand. Availability of crude is not<br />

unlimited; so many countries are tapp<strong>in</strong>g it carefully. This chapter discusses<br />

factors relat<strong>in</strong>g to availability of crude oil through out the world, its production,<br />

and consumption. Global petroleum logistics analysis is done us<strong>in</strong>g secondary<br />

data. <strong>Indian</strong> petroleum scenario is also analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g secondary data. India is<br />

still import<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed petroleum products. Hence sett<strong>in</strong>g up ref<strong>in</strong>eries may be an<br />

option <strong>in</strong> the near future to reduce or even to elim<strong>in</strong>ate import of ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

petroleum products and improve the potential for export of the same to<br />

neighbor<strong>in</strong>g countries (lOC corporate presentation 2003). A model is developed<br />

for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery anywhere <strong>in</strong> the world. This model is<br />

adopted to locate a ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> India. Likelocation, flexibility is also important <strong>in</strong><br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery logistics. Need for flexibility and areas of flexibility are also discussed <strong>in</strong><br />

detail here but no attempt is made to quantify the flexibility. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

configuration <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Indian</strong> context is also discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Similar<br />

analysis is done <strong>in</strong> the United States. So the developments <strong>in</strong> the US are taken as<br />

benchmark <strong>in</strong> this section. Initial portion is presented with basic activities <strong>in</strong> oil<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries. This will help <strong>in</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g a basic idea on the formation of crude oil,<br />

availability of crude oil, collection of crude oil, storage, trade practices,<br />

transportation through land and sea, and procedure of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. The ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

product related activities are also discussed <strong>in</strong> this section. Reports from Energy<br />

Information Adm<strong>in</strong>istration (EIA) are taken as the basic material for the oil<br />

market basicdescription presented <strong>in</strong> this section. This <strong>in</strong>formation is not used <strong>in</strong><br />

any of the model developed. Data presented is not taken for any calculations <strong>in</strong><br />

the models developed <strong>in</strong> the research, but is used to set understand<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

background <strong>in</strong> which our models can be appreciated better.<br />

32


3.2 Global <strong>Petroleum</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Location of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is strongly dependent on the place of drill<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

crude oil, purchase procedure, mode of transport, and place of consumption. So<br />

this section also analyzes <strong>in</strong> detail, these aspects with respect to the world crude<br />

oil <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

3.2.1 Demand for Crude Oil<br />

This section reviews the uses of petroleum and the data sources connected<br />

to that. The energy produced by burn<strong>in</strong>g petroleum products may be used to<br />

propel a vehicle as gasol<strong>in</strong>e, jet fuel, or diesel fuel. The energy produced is also<br />

used to heat a build<strong>in</strong>g as heat<strong>in</strong>g oil or residual fuel oil. Electric energy can<br />

produced by sp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g a turb<strong>in</strong>e directly or by creat<strong>in</strong>g steam to sp<strong>in</strong> a turb<strong>in</strong>e<br />

with help of heat produced from petroleum products. Crude oil products are<br />

used as raw material (feedstock) to produce petrochemicals or products such as<br />

plastics, polyurethane, solvents, and many other <strong>in</strong>termediate and end-user<br />

goods. These products play vital role <strong>in</strong> the present day to day life. So the<br />

dependence on crude oil for energy is steadily <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3.2.2 Global Oil Consumption<br />

Largest consumers of crude oil are the <strong>in</strong>dustrialized countries. Until 1998<br />

these were not the most important growth markets for some years. The countries<br />

ofthe Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) account<br />

for almost 2/3 of worldwide daily oil consumption. Oil demand <strong>in</strong> the OECD<br />

grew by around 11 percentages over the 1991-97 periods, while demand outside<br />

theOEeD (exclud<strong>in</strong>g the Former Soviet Union) grew by 35 percent. The collapse<br />

of the Russian economy led to a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> oil consumption of more than 50<br />

percent over the 1991-98 periods. This consumption has rega<strong>in</strong>ed almost to the<br />

same level<strong>in</strong> the next five year period.<br />

Economic condition of a country has direct bear<strong>in</strong>g on the consumption of<br />

crude oil. Developed economies use oil much more <strong>in</strong>tensively than the<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g economies. Canada and the United States stand almost alone with<br />

their high per capita consumption of oil. Oil consumption <strong>in</strong> the United States<br />

33


and Canada equals almost 3 gallons per day per capita. The difference <strong>in</strong> these<br />

countries is largely due to their transportation system. People <strong>in</strong> developed<br />

countries ma<strong>in</strong>ly depend on private vehicles to travel relatively long distances. Oil<br />

consumption <strong>in</strong> the rest of the OECD equals 1.4 gallons per day per capita.<br />

Outside the OECD, oil consumption is only 0.2 gallons per day per capita.<br />

Dependence of public transport is the ma<strong>in</strong> reason for lesser consumption of<br />

crudeoil <strong>in</strong> the under developed countries.<br />

In petroleum consumption North America is the first. In North America, it<br />

is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the United States. It is followed by Asia (with Japan the largest<br />

consumer). Europe is hold<strong>in</strong>g the third position (consumption is more evenly<br />

spread among the nations). The other regions followalmost the same pattern.<br />

3.2.3 Measur<strong>in</strong>g Oil Consumption<br />

Crude oil consumption can be measured to know the growth of each<br />

nation, region, and cont<strong>in</strong>ent. Measur<strong>in</strong>g oil consumption presents a dilemma for<br />

public and private analysts. The size and complexity of the market and the<br />

number of consumers and suppliers make data collection a daunt<strong>in</strong>g task. The<br />

EIA, like other governmental agencies and analysts, uses a variety of approaches<br />

to measure oil consumption.<br />

Consumer surveys can provide a good deal of <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to how people use<br />

oil, the characteristics of the fuel-burn<strong>in</strong>g equipment they use, and other factors<br />

that affect consumption. EIA has undertaken a variety of complex surveys to<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>e oil consumption, such as the Residential Energy Consumption Survey<br />

and the Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Energy Consumption Survey. These surveys are costly,<br />

time-consum<strong>in</strong>g, and have a long lag before publication. They are not practical<br />

alternatives for short-term data collection.<br />

Collect<strong>in</strong>g data from suppliers is a better option for estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

consumption on a rout<strong>in</strong>e basis. Here the depth of required <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />

critically affected by the frequency with which it must be reported. On an annual<br />

basis, for <strong>in</strong>stance, EIA collects and publishes detailed sales data such as its Sales<br />

of Fuel oil and Kerosene. It also reports the source for sector-by-sector<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on consumption of these fuels. Available on a State-by-State basis,<br />

34


the report's data also feed EIA's multifuel State Energy Data System (SEDS). On<br />

a monthly basis, EIA collects sales data for major products from ref<strong>in</strong>ers and<br />

from prime suppliers. Such data is published <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Petroleum</strong> Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Monthly (PMM). The prime supplier data, reflect<strong>in</strong>g first sales <strong>in</strong>to a State for<br />

local consumption, are published <strong>in</strong> the PMMon a State-by-State basis.<br />

As for other goods, EIA also rout<strong>in</strong>ely monitors the sources of supply of<br />

petroleum <strong>in</strong> order to estimate the amount of product delivered to the market.<br />

To make data collection manageable, it focuses on the 'primary supply' system.<br />

The primary system <strong>in</strong>volves ref<strong>in</strong>ers, importers, pipel<strong>in</strong>es, and mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

transporters of petroleum, large storage facilities, and storage facilities with<br />

access to waterborne deliveries or pipel<strong>in</strong>es. For most ref<strong>in</strong>ed petroleum<br />

products, the balance is:<br />

• Ref<strong>in</strong>ery production (output)<br />

• plus imports of the product<br />

• plus or m<strong>in</strong>us the change <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

• plus or m<strong>in</strong>us shipments from other domestic regions<br />

• m<strong>in</strong>us exports<br />

• equals Product Supplied<br />

<strong>Petroleum</strong> analysts equate 'Product Supplied' with consumption; there is a<br />

lag between petroleum delivered <strong>in</strong>to the market and petroleum actually<br />

consumed. The product may be stored <strong>in</strong> a tank belong<strong>in</strong>g to a wholesaler, a<br />

retailer, or a consumer before it is used. It is not possible to capture these and<br />

therefore can be surprised by short-term volume fluctuations as these tanks are<br />

unexpectedly filled or emptied. The methodology overstates demand when the<br />

product moves <strong>in</strong>to wholesaler or retailer storage and understates it dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

period when it is actually consumed. So the actual data may not be available for<br />

computation.<br />

3.2.4 <strong>Supply</strong> of Crude Oil<br />

Knowledge on the formation of crude oil, types of crude oil, drill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

procedures, place of availability, present practices <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry, etc will be<br />

added advantage <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g the decision on purchase of crude oil. So this section<br />

provides a detailed discussion on those details relat<strong>in</strong>g to crude oil.<br />

35


3.2.4.1 What is Oil and Where It Comes From?<br />

Formation of oil is a natural time consum<strong>in</strong>g process. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

most widely accepted theory, oil is composed of compressed hydrocarbons, and<br />

was formed millions of years ago <strong>in</strong> a process that began when aquatic plant and<br />

animal rema<strong>in</strong>s were covered by layers of sediment, particles of rock and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral. Over millions of years of extreme pressure and high temperatures, these<br />

particles became the mix of liquid hydrocarbons that we now know as oil.<br />

Different mixes of plant and animal rema<strong>in</strong>s, as well as pressure, heat, and time,<br />

have caused hydrocarbons to appear today <strong>in</strong> a variety of forms: crude oilfliquid),<br />

natural gas (gas), and coal (solid). Even diamonds are a form of hydrocarbons.<br />

The word 'petroleum' comes from the Lat<strong>in</strong> words petra, or rock, and<br />

oleum, oil. Oil is found <strong>in</strong> reservoirs <strong>in</strong> sedimentary rock. T<strong>in</strong>y pores <strong>in</strong> the rock<br />

allowed the petroleum to seep <strong>in</strong>. These 'reservoir rocks' hold the oil like a<br />

sponge. It is conf<strong>in</strong>ed by other non-porous layers that form a 'trap'. The world<br />

consists of many regions with different geological features formed as the earth's<br />

crust shifted. Some of these regions have more and larger petroleum traps. In<br />

some reservoir rocks, the oil is more concentrated <strong>in</strong> pools, mak<strong>in</strong>g it easier to<br />

extract, while <strong>in</strong> other reservoirs it is diffused throughout the rock.<br />

Bothfavorable characteristics are visible <strong>in</strong> the regions of Middle East, the<br />

petroleum traps are large and numerous, and the reservoir rock holds the oil <strong>in</strong><br />

substantial pools. This region's dom<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong> world oil supply is the clear result.<br />

Other regions also have large oil deposits, even if the oil is more difficult to be<br />

identified and more expensive to produce. Geologists generally agree that crude<br />

oil was formed over millions of years from the rema<strong>in</strong>s of t<strong>in</strong>y aquatic plants and<br />

animals that lived <strong>in</strong> ancient seas. <strong>Petroleum</strong> owes its existence largely to one­<br />

celled mar<strong>in</strong>e organisms. As these organisms died, they sank to the sea bed and<br />

buried with sand and mud. They formed an organic-rich layer that eventually<br />

turned to sedimentary rock. The process repeated itself, one layer cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

another.<br />

36


There are three essentials <strong>in</strong> the creation of a crude oil field:<br />

First, a 'source rock' whose geologichistory allowed the formation of crude<br />

oil. This usually is f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed, rich <strong>in</strong> organic matter.<br />

Second, migration of the oil from the source rocks to a 'reservoir rock',<br />

usually a sandstone or limestone that is thick and porous enough to hold a sizable<br />

accumulation of oil. A reservoir rock that is only a few feet thick may be<br />

commercially producible if it's at a relatively shallow depth and near other fields.<br />

To warrant the cost of produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more challeng<strong>in</strong>g regions (the Arctic North<br />

Slope) the reservoir may have to be several hundred feet thick.<br />

Third, entrapment of these material <strong>in</strong> a region. The earth is constantly<br />

creat<strong>in</strong>g irregular geologic structures through both sudden and gradual<br />

movements - earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and erosion caused by w<strong>in</strong>d and<br />

water. Uplifted rock can result <strong>in</strong> domelike structures or arched folds called<br />

anticl<strong>in</strong>es. These often serve as receptacles for hydrocarbons. The probability of<br />

discover<strong>in</strong>g oil is the greatest when such structures are formed near a source<br />

rock. In addition, an overly<strong>in</strong>g, impermeable rock must be present to seal the<br />

migrat<strong>in</strong>g oil <strong>in</strong> the structure. The oldest oil-bear<strong>in</strong>g rocks date back to more than<br />

600 million years and the youngest is about 1 million. Most oil fields have been<br />

found <strong>in</strong> rocks between 10 million and 270 million years old.<br />

Critical factor <strong>in</strong> the creation of oil is subsurface temperature, which<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases with depth. <strong>Petroleum</strong> hydrocarbons are rarely formed at temperatures<br />

less than 150 degree Fahrenheit and generally are carbonized and destroyed at<br />

temperatures higher than 500 degrees. Most hydrocarbons are found at<br />

temperatures rang<strong>in</strong>g from 225 to 350 degrees. It is the particular crude oil's<br />

geologic history that is most important <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g its characteristics. Some<br />

crude oils from Louisiana and Nigeria are similar because both were formed <strong>in</strong><br />

similar mar<strong>in</strong>e deposits. In parts of the Far East, crude oil generally is waxy,<br />

black or brown,and low <strong>in</strong> sulfur. It is similar to crude oils found <strong>in</strong> central Africa<br />

because both were formed from non-mar<strong>in</strong>e sources. In the Middle East, crude<br />

oil is black but less waxy and higher <strong>in</strong> sulfur. Crude oil from Western Australia<br />

can be a light, honey-colored liquid, while that from the North Sea typically is a<br />

37


waxy, greenish-black liquid. Many k<strong>in</strong>ds of crude oils are found <strong>in</strong> the United<br />

States because there is great variety <strong>in</strong> the geologic history of its different regions.<br />

3.2.4.2 Drill<strong>in</strong>g for Oil<br />

Prospective site identification for crude oil production is a difficult task.<br />

Companies use a variety of techniques, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g core sampl<strong>in</strong>g and Seismic<br />

test<strong>in</strong>g . Core sampl<strong>in</strong>g is physically remov<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g a cross section of the<br />

rock. Seismic test<strong>in</strong>g is the return vibrations from a man-made shockwave are<br />

measured and calibrated. Advances <strong>in</strong> technology have made considerable<br />

improvements <strong>in</strong> seismic test<strong>in</strong>g. After these exploratory tests, companies must<br />

then drill to confirm the presence of oil or gas. A 'dry hole' is an unsuccessful<br />

well, one where the drill<strong>in</strong>g did not f<strong>in</strong>d oil or gas, or not enough to be<br />

economically worth produc<strong>in</strong>g. A successful well may conta<strong>in</strong> either oil or gas,<br />

and often both, because the gas is dissolved <strong>in</strong> the oil. When gas is present <strong>in</strong> oil,<br />

itisextracted from the liquid at the surface <strong>in</strong> a process. Oil production and this<br />

process is not the same.<br />

Search<strong>in</strong>g for oil <strong>in</strong> a field where it had not yet been discovered is called<br />

wild cat well. It has a low chance of success. Only one out of five wildcat wells<br />

found oil or gas. The rest were dry holes. Better <strong>in</strong>formation, especially from<br />

seismic technology, has improved the success rate to one out of three and,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to latest <strong>in</strong>formation, one <strong>in</strong> two. Reduc<strong>in</strong>g the money wasted on dry<br />

holes is one of the aspects of upstream activity that has allowed the <strong>in</strong>dustry to<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d and produce oil at the prices prevail<strong>in</strong>g over much of the 1990'S. After a<br />

successful well that identifies the presence of oil and gas, additional wells are<br />

drilled to test the production conditions and determ<strong>in</strong>e the boundaries of the<br />

reservoir. F<strong>in</strong>ally, production wells, or development wells are put <strong>in</strong> place, along<br />

with tanks, pipel<strong>in</strong>es and gas process<strong>in</strong>g plants. So the oil can be produced,<br />

moved to markets and sold. Once extracted, the crude oil must be ref<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>to<br />

usable products for market<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

38


3.2.4.3 How Oil is Produced<br />

The most important determ<strong>in</strong>ant of whether the reservoir is economically<br />

viable or not is the naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g pressure <strong>in</strong> the underground reservoir.<br />

The pressure varies with the characteristics of the trap, the reservoir rock and the<br />

production history. Most oil is produced by 'natural lift' production methods.<br />

The pressure <strong>in</strong> the underground is high enough to force the oil to the surface.<br />

Reservoirs <strong>in</strong> the Middle East tend to be long-lived on 'natural lift' that is the<br />

reservoir pressure cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be great enough to force the oil out.<br />

Undergroundpressure <strong>in</strong> older reservoirs eventually dissipates, and oil no longer<br />

flows to the surface naturally. It must be pumped out by means of an 'artificial<br />

lift'. Apump powered by gas or electricity is used to lift crude oil. Majority of the<br />

oil from the reservoirs <strong>in</strong> the United States are produced us<strong>in</strong>g some k<strong>in</strong>d of<br />

artificial lift us<strong>in</strong>g pumps. Itgives better output also.<br />

Primary production methods become <strong>in</strong>effective over a period of time and<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued production requires the use of additional secondary production<br />

methods. One common method uses water to displace oil, us<strong>in</strong>g a method called<br />

waterflood, which forces the oil to the drilled shaft or wellbore. Producers may<br />

need to for tertiary or enhanced oil recovery methods. These techniques are often<br />

focussed on <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the flow characteristics of oil through the use of steam,<br />

carbon dioxide and other gases or chemicals. In the United States, primary<br />

production methods account for less than 40 percent of the oil produced on a<br />

daily basis, secondary methods account for about half, and tertiary recovery the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 10 percent. Both the vary<strong>in</strong>g reservoir characteristics and the physical<br />

characteristics of the crude oil are important components of the cost of produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

oil. The costs can range from $2 per barrel <strong>in</strong> the Middle East to more than $15<br />

per barrel <strong>in</strong> some fields <strong>in</strong> the United States. This cost <strong>in</strong>cludes capital recovery<br />

also.<br />

3.2.4.4 The Impact of Upstream Technology<br />

Revolutioniz<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation available about the features of a geologic<br />

structure has enhanced the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil. A primary benefit is the ability to<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ate poor prospects. This is considerably reduc<strong>in</strong>g wasted expenditures on<br />

39


dry holes. Drill<strong>in</strong>g and production technologies have made it possible to exploit<br />

reservoirs that would formerly have been too costly to put <strong>in</strong>to production and to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease the recovery from exist<strong>in</strong>g reservoirs. Technology also has contributed to<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g oil exploration and production safer for the <strong>in</strong>dustry and for the<br />

environment. Offshore production can be operated from onshore. The automatic<br />

shutoff systems is used to m<strong>in</strong>imize the pollution risk. The proven crude oil<br />

reserves have <strong>in</strong>creased from about 650 billion barrels <strong>in</strong> 1977 to about 900<br />

billion barrels <strong>in</strong> 1987 and further to about 1074 billion barrels as at the end of<br />

2001. This has been possible due to the susta<strong>in</strong>ed efforts <strong>in</strong> Oil exploration. The<br />

Organization of <strong>Petroleum</strong> Export<strong>in</strong>g Countries, popularly called the OPEC<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ues to dom<strong>in</strong>ate the share of world oil reserves. Its share <strong>in</strong> world oil<br />

reserves has <strong>in</strong>creased from 67 % <strong>in</strong> 1977 (436.2 billion barrels) to 77% <strong>in</strong> 2001<br />

(845 billion barrels). As a country, Saudi Arabia has the highest oil reserves <strong>in</strong> the<br />

world with a share of 25 %, followedby Iraq, UAE, and Iran, each with 10 -11 % of<br />

world oil reserves. The proven crude oil reserves as at end of 2001 are given <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 3.1<br />

Table 3.1 World proven crude oil reserves byregion, 1996·2001 (rn. b.)<br />

Region 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />

North America 30722 30652 31272 30147 33066 33346<br />

Lat<strong>in</strong> America 138762 140342 141909 123104 123780 123896<br />

Eastern Europe 67366 67374 67281 67260 67160 66790<br />

Western Europe 18540 18751 18348 18843 18033 18128<br />

Middle East 675996 676755 677806 678737 694754 696261<br />

Africa 74776 75195 76980 83504 90004 92797<br />

Asia and Pacific 43428 43438 44255 44387 44391 44980<br />

Total World 1049590 1052508 1057853 1045381 1070686 1074850<br />

OPEC 802819 806080 810144 818247 840538 845412<br />

OPEC Percentage 76.5 76.6 76.6 78.2 78.5 78.7<br />

Source: OPEC Annual report 2001<br />

Crude oil available at all places does not have the same quality. Specific<br />

Gravity and sulfur content of crude oil ma<strong>in</strong>ly decide quality. Production of crude<br />

oil is gradually<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g because the demand is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. Table 3.1 shows that<br />

availability of crude is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g, rather it is not decreas<strong>in</strong>g when compared to<br />

production. Phenomenon of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g production is cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all other<br />

countries.<br />

40


flows, dictated by economics, logistics, and temporary imbalances <strong>in</strong> supply and<br />

demand, are vital to the efficient operation of the oil market.<br />

3.2.6 Regional Importers and Exporters<br />

North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific are the world's three largest<br />

consum<strong>in</strong>g regions. They are all importers. All the other regions are<br />

exporters. The Middle East still exports more oil than any other region. Despite<br />

the strong growth <strong>in</strong> production <strong>in</strong> other areas <strong>in</strong> recent years they cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be<br />

the largest exporters. This global dependence on Middle East oil makes the geo­<br />

political importance of the Middle East. There is less variation among the<br />

import<strong>in</strong>g regions. In the decade preced<strong>in</strong>g its 1997-98 f<strong>in</strong>ancial crisis, Asia­<br />

Pacific's economic boom propelled it <strong>in</strong>to the number one spot, with import<br />

growth more than double that of any other region's. The United States is the<br />

largest <strong>in</strong>dividual importer, both net and gross put together. North America as a<br />

region ranks third because Canada and Mexicoare two of the United States' three<br />

top oilsuppliers. Their exports to the United States offset U.S. imports from these<br />

neighbors <strong>in</strong> the regional calculation. Net imports are gross imports m<strong>in</strong>us gross<br />

exports. This has kept North America's import dependency down to around 30<br />

percent, half that of the Asia-Pacific region at its 1997 peak. Asia-Pacific region's<br />

import dependency and even its import volume make it as the world's top<br />

import<strong>in</strong>g region. This is ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the lesser domestic production.<br />

3.2.7 Global Patterns of Oil Trade<br />

Purchas<strong>in</strong>g is an important activity <strong>in</strong> the petroleum supply cha<strong>in</strong>. To<br />

make the purchas<strong>in</strong>g effective, one must be aware of the trade practices<br />

prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry. This section deals with the crude oil trade patterns and<br />

practices prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

3.2.7.1 Oil Trade: Highest Volume, HighestValue<br />

International trade of oil is more than anyth<strong>in</strong>g else. This is true whether<br />

one measures trade by volume or by its value, or by the carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity needed<br />

to move it. All measures are important for different reasons. Volume provides<br />

<strong>in</strong>sights about whether markets are over supplied or under-supplied and whether<br />

42


the <strong>in</strong>frastructure is adequate to accommodate the required flow or not. Value<br />

allows governments and economists to assess patterns of <strong>in</strong>ternational trade and<br />

balance of trade and balance of payments. Carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity allows the shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry to assess how many tankers are required and on what routes.<br />

Transportation and storage play a critical additional role here. They are not just<br />

the physical l<strong>in</strong>k between the importers and the exporters, but between producers<br />

and ref<strong>in</strong>ers, ref<strong>in</strong>ers and marketers, and marketers and consumers; their<br />

associated costs are a primary factor <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the pattern of world trade.<br />

These factors contribute to the smooth flow of crude oil.<br />

3.2.7.2 Distance: The Nearest Market First<br />

Crude oil and petroleum products flow to the markets that provide the<br />

highest value to the supplier. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g else be<strong>in</strong>g equal, oil is traded and<br />

transported to the nearest market first, because that has the lowest<br />

transportation cost. It therefore provides the supplier with the highest net<br />

revenue, <strong>in</strong> oil market term<strong>in</strong>ology, the highest netback. If this market cannot<br />

absorb all the oil, the balance moves to the next closest market and the next and<br />

so on. This will cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong>curr<strong>in</strong>g progressively higher transportation costs, until<br />

all the oil is sold. The recent growth <strong>in</strong> dependence of the United States on its<br />

Western Hemisphere neighbors is an illustration of this 'nearer-is-better'<br />

syndrome. Western Hemisphere sources now supply over half of the United<br />

States import volume, much of it on voyages of less than a week. Another quarter<br />

comes from elsewhere <strong>in</strong> the area called the Atlantic Bas<strong>in</strong>. Those countries are<br />

on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. This oil, especially from the North Sea and<br />

Africa, takes just 2-3 weeks to reach the United States, and boosts the so-called<br />

short-haul share of U.S. imports to over three-quarters. Most North Sea and<br />

North and West African crude oils stay <strong>in</strong> the Atlantic Bas<strong>in</strong>, mov<strong>in</strong>g to Europe or<br />

North America on routes that rarely take over 20 days. In contrast, voyage times<br />

to Asia for the nearest of these, the West African crude oils, would be over 30<br />

days to S<strong>in</strong>gapore, ris<strong>in</strong>g to nearly 40 for Japan. Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, therefore, most<br />

of Asia's oil comes <strong>in</strong>stead from the Middle East, only 20-30 days away. Mexico<br />

and Venezuela have consciously helped the trend toward short-haul shipments.<br />

They pro-actively took the strategic decision to make as large and as profitable<br />

43


market. They make it possible for poor quality crude oil also. Their reserves are<br />

unusually biased toward those hard-to-place grades. Both countries therefore<br />

targeted their nearest markets. They target U.S. Gulf Coast and the Caribbean for<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>t venture ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong>vestments. They began with ref<strong>in</strong>eries that had<br />

traditionally run their crude oil, and then with ref<strong>in</strong>eries that might be upgraded<br />

to do so. This policy has turned poor quality crude oil to be preferred at these<br />

sites. Western Hemisphere has significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the crude oil self­<br />

sufficiency with this policy.<br />

Shipp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry will get affected by a change <strong>in</strong> trade flow patern.A<br />

change <strong>in</strong> trade flow patterns can also be of critical importance to the shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry. For example, the Suez crisis of 1957 forced tanker owners back to us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the much longer route around the Cape of Good Hope, and resulted <strong>in</strong> the<br />

development of Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) to reduce that voyage's higher<br />

costs. The shift to short-haul routes <strong>in</strong> the 1990'S was also critical. Us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> world trade volumes as a proxy for demand, tanker owners had been<br />

expect<strong>in</strong>g a return to a strong tanker market. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the surge <strong>in</strong><br />

short haul imports <strong>in</strong> the Atlantic Bas<strong>in</strong> and the shift of Middle East exports from<br />

the longer United States to shorter Asian voyages led to a sharp decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />

average voyage length. This decl<strong>in</strong>e was accelerated by the return of Iraqi crude<br />

exports, many of which move on the extremely short route from the Black Sea<br />

end ofthe Iraq-Turkey pipel<strong>in</strong>e to the Mediterranean. The tanker owners' outlook<br />

was thus fad<strong>in</strong>g even before world trade volumes were underm<strong>in</strong>ed by the Asian<br />

crisis. In practice, trade flows do not always follow the simple 'nearest first'<br />

pattern. Three important factors that tie <strong>in</strong>to profitability of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery configurations, product demand mix, product quality specifications, and<br />

politics can all change the rank<strong>in</strong>gs. Different markets frequently place different<br />

values on particular grades of oil. Thus, a low sulfur diesel is worth more <strong>in</strong> the<br />

United States, where the maximum allowable sulfur is 0.05 percent by weight,<br />

than <strong>in</strong> Africa, where the maximum can be 10 to 20 times higher. Similarly,<br />

African crude oils are worth relatively more <strong>in</strong> Asia, where they may allow a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>er to meet tighter sulfur limits <strong>in</strong> the region without <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

upgrades. Such differences <strong>in</strong> valu<strong>in</strong>g quality can be sufficient to overcome<br />

44


transportation cost disadvantages, as the relatively recent establishment of a<br />

significant trade <strong>in</strong> long-distance African crude oils to Asia shows. The cost of<br />

transportation of crude oil will change when the government policies such as<br />

tariff changes. The balance on transportation can be lost due to these types of<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> policies.<br />

3.2.7.3 Crude versus Products<br />

World oil trade is still dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the trade <strong>in</strong> crude oil. Quality changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> product are one of the ma<strong>in</strong> reasons. The risk-weighted economics clearly<br />

support position<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries close to consumers rather than close to the<br />

wellhead. This position<strong>in</strong>g policy takes maximum advantage of the economies of<br />

scale of large ships; especially as local quality specifications are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

fragment<strong>in</strong>g the product market. It maximizes the ref<strong>in</strong>er's ability to tailor the<br />

product output to the market's short-term surges such as those caused by<br />

weather, equipment outages, etc. In addition, this policy also guards aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

very real risk that governments will impose on selective import restrictions to<br />

protect their domestic ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector. As noted <strong>in</strong> the section on, there are a<br />

limited number of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centers that are at odds with this general rule, hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

been developed to serve particular export markets. These export ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centers<br />

give rise to some regular <strong>in</strong>ter-regional product moves, but they are the<br />

exceptions. Major export ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centres are S<strong>in</strong>gapore, the Caribbean, and the<br />

Middle East. The <strong>in</strong>ter-regional products trade is largely a temporary market­<br />

balanc<strong>in</strong>g function. Some <strong>in</strong>ter-regional flows are extremely short lived, as when<br />

extremely cold weather <strong>in</strong> Europe causes the United States to export heat<strong>in</strong>g oil.<br />

Alonger-lived example arose when a large proportion of European drivers opted<br />

for diesel cars, leav<strong>in</strong>g the region <strong>in</strong> the late 1990'S with surplus capacity to<br />

produce gasol<strong>in</strong>e for export to the United States. This gave a new product<br />

demand pattern and transport requirements <strong>in</strong> that scetor.<br />

3.2.7.4 Tankers and Pipel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Tankers and pipel<strong>in</strong>es are the two modes used for transportation of <strong>in</strong>ter­<br />

regional trade. Tankers have made use for <strong>in</strong>tercont<strong>in</strong>ental transport of crude oil.<br />

The major reasons for us<strong>in</strong>g tankers are, they are low cost, efficient, and<br />

45


extremely flexible. Pipel<strong>in</strong>es are the mode preferred for transcont<strong>in</strong>ental crude<br />

oil movements. All tanker trade routes do not use the same size ship. Each route<br />

usually has one size that is clearly work out the economics best. The size is<br />

selected on the basis of voyage length, port and canal constra<strong>in</strong>ts, and volume.<br />

Crude oil exports from the Middle East are moved ma<strong>in</strong>ly by Very Large Crude<br />

Carriers (VLCC's) typically carry<strong>in</strong>g over 2 million barrels of oil on every voyage.<br />

Pipel<strong>in</strong>es are critical for landlocked crude oils and they also complement tankers<br />

at certa<strong>in</strong> key locations by reliev<strong>in</strong>g bottlenecks transport or provid<strong>in</strong>g shortcuts<br />

to certa<strong>in</strong> other places. The only <strong>in</strong>ter-regional trade that currently relies solely<br />

on pipel<strong>in</strong>es is crude from Russia to Europe. Pipel<strong>in</strong>es contribute ma<strong>in</strong> role <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tra-regional trade. They are the primary option for transcont<strong>in</strong>ental<br />

transportation <strong>in</strong> almost all part of the world. They are cheaper to a great extend<br />

than any alternative such as rail, barge, or road. The development <strong>in</strong> technology<br />

<strong>in</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g of large diameter pipel<strong>in</strong>es dur<strong>in</strong>g World War 11 allowed the<br />

development of the vast pipel<strong>in</strong>e network that moves crude oil and product.<br />

Fungibility is an important factor <strong>in</strong> transportation economics of crude oil<br />

and products. Fungibility is the ability to substitute one shipment for another, to<br />

exchange between regions. Because the oil is broadly <strong>in</strong>terchangeable (fungible),<br />

it can be mixed without any significant change <strong>in</strong> value. Environmental<br />

mandates have required different regional and seasonal qualities of gasol<strong>in</strong>e. The<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> mandates <strong>in</strong>creased substantially <strong>in</strong> batch<strong>in</strong>g for transport and<br />

segregation for storage. Thus the logistics flexibility <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> a product's<br />

fungibility has disappeared. This is <strong>in</strong>visible to consumers dur<strong>in</strong>g normal times.<br />

This adversely contributes to market upheavals and price spikes <strong>in</strong> times of<br />

sudden changes<strong>in</strong> demand or supply, as dur<strong>in</strong>g the early driv<strong>in</strong>g season <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

Table 3.3 World exports of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products by region, 1996·2001(1000b/d)<br />

Region names 1996 1997 1988 1999 2000 2001<br />

North America 1203.6 1251.3 1174.2 1171.2 1360.3 1374.5<br />

Lat<strong>in</strong> America 1848.1 2002.2 2130.5 2079.2 2063.9 2131.7<br />

Eastern Europe 1188.9 1220.7 1112.8 1143.8 1325.8 1512.3<br />

Western Europe 4154.9 4246.3 4263.2 4252.7 4436.1 4454.1<br />

Middle East 3197.3 3335.9 3284.2 3302.1 3140.3 2962.6<br />

Africa 871.0 1049.4 957.6 1162.2 1142.7 1193.6<br />

Asia and Pacific 2697.1 2970.8 2936.4 2852.7 2844.1 2869.8<br />

Total World 15160.9 16076.7 15858.9 15963.9 16313.0 16498.5<br />

OPEC 4411.7 4668.0 4580.2 4745.3 4506.8 4317.8<br />

OPEC % 29.1 29.0 28.9 29.7 27.6 26.2<br />

Source: OPEC Annual report,2001<br />

46


temperatures. Middle distillates (jet fuel, kerosene, distillates such as home<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g oil and diesel fuel) come next. The heaviest products (residuum or<br />

residual fuel oil) are recovered as the last. The heavier fractions are processed<br />

<strong>in</strong>to lighter products to maximize the output of the most desirable products.<br />

3.2.8.2 Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Downstream process<strong>in</strong>g is grouped together <strong>in</strong> this section. Downstream<br />

process is the process that follows crude oil distillation. This <strong>in</strong>cludes and<br />

requires a very large variety of highly complex units designed for very different<br />

upgrad<strong>in</strong>g processes. Downstream process makes some change <strong>in</strong> the molecular<br />

structure of the <strong>in</strong>put with chemical reactions, and some with thermal reactions.<br />

Chemical reactions <strong>in</strong> crude oil are normally tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> the presence of a<br />

catalyst. These processes are designed to take heavy, low-valued feedstock and<br />

change it <strong>in</strong>to lighter, higher-valued output. A catalytic cracker uses the gas oil,<br />

heavy distillate, output from crude distillation as its feedstock and produces<br />

additional f<strong>in</strong>ished distillates (heat<strong>in</strong>g oil and diesel) and gasol<strong>in</strong>e. Sulfur<br />

removal is accomplished <strong>in</strong> a hydrotreater. A reform<strong>in</strong>g unit produces higher<br />

octane components for gasol<strong>in</strong>e from lower octane feedstock that was recovered<br />

<strong>in</strong> the distillation process. A coker uses the heaviest output of distillation, the<br />

residue, to produce a lighter feedstock for further process<strong>in</strong>g, as well as<br />

petroleum coke. The output from simple distillation of a crude oil like Arab Light<br />

would be about 20 percent of lightest, gasol<strong>in</strong>e-like products, and about 50<br />

percent ofthe heaviest. Further process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the most sophisticated ref<strong>in</strong>ery can<br />

produce the f<strong>in</strong>ished product output <strong>in</strong> to about 60 percent gasol<strong>in</strong>e, and 5<br />

percent heaviest.<br />

3.2.8.3 Crude Oil Quality<br />

Crude oil with a similar mix of physical and chemical characteristics,<br />

usually produced from a given reservoir constitutes a crude oil stream. Crude oils<br />

are classified by their density and sulfur content. Less dense (lighter) crude oils<br />

generally have a higher share of light hydrocarbons. It is a higher value product.<br />

It can be recovered with simple distillation. The denser (heavier) crude oils<br />

produce a greater share of lower-valued products with simple distillation and<br />

51


equire additional process<strong>in</strong>g to produce the desired range of products. Some<br />

crude oils also have higher sulfur content. It is an undesirable characteristic with<br />

respect to both process<strong>in</strong>g and product quality. For pric<strong>in</strong>g purposes crude oils of<br />

similar quality are often compared to a s<strong>in</strong>gle representative crude oil. This is the<br />

benchmark of the quality of crude oil.<br />

Process<strong>in</strong>g and re-process<strong>in</strong>g necessary to achieve the optimal mix of<br />

product output is decided by the quality of the crude oil. Premium crude oil like<br />

West Texas Intermediate has a relatively high natural yield of desirable naphtha<br />

and straight-run gasol<strong>in</strong>e. Nigeria's Bonny Light, has a high natural yield of<br />

middle distillates. Saudi Arabia's Arabian Light is a heavy residue (residuum)<br />

that must be reprocessed or sold at a discount to crude oil. West Texas<br />

Intermediate and Bonny Light have a yield of about one-third residuum after the<br />

simple distillation process.<br />

The type of hydrocarbon molecules and other natural characteristics<br />

affects the cost of process<strong>in</strong>g. The molecular structure of a crude oil also decides<br />

the suitability of a crude oil for the manufacture of special products such as<br />

lubricat<strong>in</strong>g oils. Ref<strong>in</strong>ers therefore try to ref<strong>in</strong>e the optimal mix of crude oils<br />

through their ref<strong>in</strong>eries, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the ref<strong>in</strong>ery's equipment, the desired<br />

output mix, and the relative price of available crude oil.<br />

3.2.8.4 Other Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Inputs<br />

A variety of other specialized <strong>in</strong>puts enhances the ref<strong>in</strong>er's capability to<br />

make the desired mix of products. Among these products might be unf<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

oil, or imported residual fuel oil used as <strong>in</strong>put to a vacuum distillation unit. The<br />

world crude oil reserves are concentrated <strong>in</strong> a few countries, whereas the demand<br />

for petroleum products is almost universal. This leads to the need for distribution<br />

ofcrude and products obta<strong>in</strong>ed after ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to all over the world. International<br />

trade <strong>in</strong> crude oil and petroleum products is a large and active market. In 1997,<br />

about 1544 million tons of crude oil and 435 million tons of petroleum products<br />

were traded worldwide. Table 3.8. shows the world ref<strong>in</strong>ery capacity, region wise.<br />

An important observation made is that though the crude capacity of OPEC is<br />

52


Figure 3.8. World map on ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

Later years the situation improved substantially and world wide capacity<br />

atilization improved to 88% <strong>in</strong> 1994, which has further improved to a level of<br />

90% <strong>in</strong> 2000. Consider<strong>in</strong>g this level of capacity utilization, 43soMMTPA of<br />

ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity must be there to meet the crude oil process<strong>in</strong>g requirement by<br />

the year 2010. This necessitates an <strong>in</strong>crease of 780MMTPA ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity.<br />

Although much of <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> capacity will come from expansion of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries, many new ref<strong>in</strong>eries must be commissioned to meet the forecast<br />

demand of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. In Asia Pacific region, 7S% of the region's ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

capacity is concentrated <strong>in</strong> six countries Le. <strong>in</strong> Japan, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, South Korea, India,<br />

Indonesia and S<strong>in</strong>gapore. Asia's <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g Oil demand represents almost 70% of<br />

worldwide growth. To meet <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>in</strong> petroleum products, total<br />

ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> Asia pacific is likely to <strong>in</strong>crease from lS.30 million b/day<br />

(76SMMTPA) <strong>in</strong> 1993 to 20.1 million bid (1000 MMTPA) <strong>in</strong> 200S. It can be<br />

clearly seenfrom fig. 3.8 that ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is done nearer to po<strong>in</strong>t ofconsumption. As<br />

per estimates, 42 grass root ref<strong>in</strong>eries are under construction and plann<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />

<strong>in</strong> the region. Total capacity of these projects is about 17SMMTPA. Out of this<br />

6SMMTPA capacity is considered firm and another 6SMMTPA is expected to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>stalled by expansion <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries. However the capacity utilization of<br />

OPEC is above 100 percent. The global ref<strong>in</strong>ed out put is 7298.9 bb/d, Table 3.8<br />

shnws the detailed region wise out put of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products It can also be observed<br />

that the lowest ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity is <strong>in</strong> Africa. Table 3.7 shows the world<br />

consumption of petroleum products by region. North America is the largest<br />

consumer (2036.99bb/d <strong>in</strong> 2001) followed by Asia and Pacific.<br />

54


Table 3.10. Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> Asia Pacific (OOObb/d)<br />

Country 1993 2000 2005<br />

Japan 5005 5500 5500<br />

Korea 1675 2488 2488<br />

Taiwan 600 720 900<br />

S<strong>in</strong>Qapore 1085 1135 1135<br />

Indonesia 856 1011 1131<br />

Malaysia 230 450 450<br />

Thailand 395 780 780<br />

Philipp<strong>in</strong>es 296 399 399<br />

India 1086 1598 2025<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a 3200 3900 4400<br />

Australia 732 807 807<br />

New Zealand 92 92 92<br />

Total 15302 18880 20107<br />

Source. OPECAnnual report,2002<br />

3.2.9 Stocks of Crude oil<br />

This section discusses the availability and consumption of crude oil <strong>in</strong> the<br />

global, regional, and local scenario.<br />

3.2.9.1 Why Stocks Are Important<br />

There are 7.8 billion barrels of oil tied up with <strong>in</strong>dustry and government<br />

stocks. The reason for those stocks is to keep the global supply smooth. The oil is<br />

stored <strong>in</strong> pipel<strong>in</strong>es from oil well, crude oil tanks, tankers, the pipel<strong>in</strong>es to the<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries, rail wagons, road tankers, and tank to retail outlets. All these put<br />

together make the oil <strong>in</strong>dustry deliver the right product to the right location at<br />

the right time. Only 10 percentage of this sock is available to the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the demand of the <strong>in</strong>dustry. When the level of stock reduces <strong>in</strong> a<br />

particular market, the price of crude oil will go up. It will lead to encourage extra<br />

supply and the prices will come down. When the stocks are high, the prices of<br />

crude oil come down <strong>in</strong> that region. Projected stocks are considered as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicator of prices of crude oil <strong>in</strong> a market. So it is closely monitored. It is difficult<br />

to closely monitor the global stock due to the diversified market locations. The<br />

United States is the only country to publish comprehensive weekly stock data.<br />

They have the largest commercial stock (one billion barrels). Largest part of<br />

crude oil stock is <strong>in</strong> Gulf Coast. East Coast is hav<strong>in</strong>g the greatest f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

products <strong>in</strong>ventories.<br />

55


World's majority of the storage capacity is owned by the companies that<br />

produce, ref<strong>in</strong>e, or market the oil. Independent operators also store a small<br />

important portion. They are hold<strong>in</strong>g it at the world's ma<strong>in</strong> trad<strong>in</strong>g hubs. This<br />

small portion makes the hubs successful and viable. The <strong>in</strong>dependent storage<br />

volume is a key <strong>in</strong>dicator to what is happen<strong>in</strong>g to discretionary stocks.<br />

3.2.9.2 Stocks are Seasonal<br />

Oil stock <strong>in</strong> the world follows a seasonal pattern. In the middle of w<strong>in</strong>ter it<br />

goes downand goes up <strong>in</strong> the spr<strong>in</strong>g. Itleads to high price <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter and low price<br />

<strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g. Reason for stock change is the demand for products. Heat<strong>in</strong>g oil,<br />

propane, and kerosene demand drive world oil seasonality. Crude oil stocks are<br />

also seasonal. When the ref<strong>in</strong>eries make maximum through put, the stock will<br />

come down and stock will go up when the ref<strong>in</strong>eries go for shutdown<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. Asia's ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g system has its maximum output <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong> summer due to scheduled ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. Maximum through put <strong>in</strong><br />

US is <strong>in</strong> summer and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance is <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter. So the stock fluctuation <strong>in</strong> crude<br />

oil <strong>in</strong> the global level is m<strong>in</strong>imum. The product stock variation is more than that<br />

of oil stocks.<br />

3.2.9.3 Strategic Stocks<br />

Government controlled stocks are called strategic stocks. It is a buffer<br />

stock aga<strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>terruption <strong>in</strong> supply of crude oil. The largest of the strategic stock<br />

is with US Strategic <strong>Petroleum</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> (SPS). The <strong>in</strong>ternational Energy Agency's<br />

rule says that each participat<strong>in</strong>g nation must hold stocks equal to 90 days of<br />

imports. Most of the nations meet the requirement with <strong>in</strong>dustry owned stocks.<br />

United States, Japan, and a few other nations hold government controlled stocks.<br />

3.2.9.4 Costs and Profits<br />

Money is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g up stocks. Quantum of money depends up<br />

on the type ofoil, quantity stored, ownership of storage facility, price of crude oil,<br />

and the opportunity cost of money. The cost <strong>in</strong>ventory becomes significant to the<br />

56


marg<strong>in</strong> of the stake holders. Every petroleum station, term<strong>in</strong>al, and ref<strong>in</strong>ery must<br />

have some <strong>in</strong>ventory. This <strong>in</strong>creases the quantity of stock <strong>in</strong> different stages.<br />

Through consolidation of <strong>in</strong>dustry this stock can be m<strong>in</strong>imized. Stock need not be<br />

treated as a money spend<strong>in</strong>g area alone. Stocks can be used for mak<strong>in</strong>g profit<br />

also. Stocks can be made when one company expects hike <strong>in</strong> oil price and if they<br />

have money to <strong>in</strong>vest, they can stock oil to make profit through purchase.<br />

3.2.10 Prices of CrudeOil<br />

Demand for one product is also connected with demand for another<br />

product. Demand for each product <strong>in</strong> each region establishes a price level for<br />

crude oil and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. The price fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the products are small<br />

and it is the <strong>in</strong>terest of buyers and sellers with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry. The stability <strong>in</strong><br />

prices can be affected by different reasons. They are sudden <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> demand,<br />

storage <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries, and demand surges. Prices shoot up <strong>in</strong>itially and then<br />

stabilizes when the fluctuation <strong>in</strong> demand stabilize. The crude oil price slashed <strong>in</strong><br />

1998 and price <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> 2000 took longer period to come back. These are<br />

exceptions <strong>in</strong> the oil price consistency pattern.<br />

3.2.10.1 Overview: Costs plus Market Conditions<br />

Like any other goods and services, price of crude oil is affected by<br />

products' underly<strong>in</strong>g cost and market conditions. Price is also affected by the<br />

consumer behaviour.<br />

The pre-tax price of gasol<strong>in</strong>e (or any other ref<strong>in</strong>ed oil product) reflects:<br />

• Its raw material, crude oil<br />

• Transportation from produc<strong>in</strong>g field to ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

• Process<strong>in</strong>g that raw material <strong>in</strong>to ref<strong>in</strong>ed products (ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g)<br />

• Transportation from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery to the consum<strong>in</strong>g market<br />

• Transportation, storage and distribution between the market<br />

distribution center and the retail outlet or consumer.<br />

• Market conditions at each stage along the way, and <strong>in</strong> the local market<br />

Crude oil is the raw material for petroleum products. <strong>Supply</strong> and demand<br />

conditions <strong>in</strong> the global market decide the price of crude oil. Global market is<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly based on the trades <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gapore, Northwest Europe, US, and Gulf Cost.<br />

Price of products is based on the price of crude oil. The ref<strong>in</strong>ed products are<br />

57


marketed through ma<strong>in</strong> distribution centres. Products from the ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> that<br />

area, shipments, and imported products form the product suppliers. These<br />

products are distributed to local retailers us<strong>in</strong>g barges, railways, pipel<strong>in</strong>es, and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ally trucks. Oil markets are <strong>in</strong>ter-connected by the supply <strong>in</strong> one region from<br />

the other regions. So the products prices are affected by the prices abroad.<br />

Many transactions are tak<strong>in</strong>g place for oil at different parts of the world.<br />

Price of oil based on those transactions. Production of oil is almost constant<br />

through control of OPECcountries. Oil prices are fixed on the basis of bidd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational market. When the demand is more and supply is less, the bidder<br />

will be forced to pay more. This is called strong market. When the demand is less<br />

supply is more, the bidder will be <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> pay<strong>in</strong>g less. This is called weak<br />

market. Bidders need not always compete. Depends on their stock position they<br />

may wait for the price to come down to their desired level. When the prices come<br />

down, they will come for bidd<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Transactions are also different types <strong>in</strong> oil market. The most common type<br />

is contract purchase. The price is fixed <strong>in</strong> advance for the delivery <strong>in</strong> a later<br />

period. Spot transaction is also prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the oil market. When the contract<br />

quantity is not enough for a ref<strong>in</strong>er, may go for spot transaction. Demand for<br />

different crude oil also leads to spot transaction. Oil is also traded <strong>in</strong> future<br />

markets. This is for cover<strong>in</strong>g risk due to price fluctuation. This is based on the<br />

expectation of price of oil <strong>in</strong> the market. In this market physical supply of oil is<br />

not common. Spot market gives a clear idea about the trend <strong>in</strong> demand and<br />

supply. Increase <strong>in</strong> price means more demand for the products and decrease <strong>in</strong><br />

price <strong>in</strong>dicates reduction <strong>in</strong> demand for crude oil. Majority of oil be<strong>in</strong>g traded <strong>in</strong><br />

contract terms, the price changes are based on spot purchase. Futures market<br />

also gives <strong>in</strong>dication on the trend <strong>in</strong> the demand and supply balance. Seasonal<br />

changes are the other important factors that affect the price of oil. In cold seasons<br />

the demand will be more and <strong>in</strong> hot seasons the demand will be less. This also<br />

will affect the price of oil <strong>in</strong> region. Regionaldemand can affect the consistency of<br />

price. Government policies are another factor that can affect the price of crude<br />

oil.<br />

58


3.3 <strong>Indian</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

So far the discussion was on the world scenario of petroleum supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Now the petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> India willbe discussed.<br />

3.3.1 Availability of crude oil <strong>in</strong> India<br />

Despite the existence of other sources of energy like electricity, petroleum,<br />

andnatural gas, sub-sector has witnessed a very rapid rate of growth. The limited<br />

resources of oil and natural gas and stabilization of <strong>in</strong>digenous oil production at<br />

around 33.682 MMT PA, the gap between oil production and consumption has<br />

widened over the years.<br />

The production reached a level of<br />

35.17MMT dur<strong>in</strong>g 1995-96, which is the<br />

highest level reached by the country so<br />

far. However, subsequent years<br />

witnessed shortfall <strong>in</strong> the production of<br />

crude oil. It is clear from Table 3.11 that<br />

the production of crude oil is consistently<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g. The ma<strong>in</strong> reason is that India<br />

Table 3.11 Selfreliance of<br />

<strong>Petroleum</strong> products<br />

Domestic Consump Self<br />

Year Production tionl relianc<br />

(MMT Demand e (%)<br />

1989-90 34.09 54.10 63<br />

1990-91 33.02 55.04 56<br />

1991-92 30.35 56.97 50<br />

1992-93 26.95 58.90 43<br />

1993-94 27.03 61.54 41<br />

1994-95 32.24 67.45 45<br />

1995-96 35.17 74.67 44<br />

1996-97 32.90 79.17 39<br />

1997-98 33.95 85.49 37<br />

1998-99 32.72 90.80 34<br />

1999-00 33.86 96.44 33<br />

could not f<strong>in</strong>d new crude oil sources. The consumption was shoot<strong>in</strong>g up from<br />

54.1MMT <strong>in</strong> 1990 to 96.44 MMT <strong>in</strong>2000. This <strong>in</strong>crease of 78% <strong>in</strong> demand<br />

affected our self-reliance very badly to reduce from63% <strong>in</strong>1990 to 33%<strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

So 2/3 rd of our crude oil demand is met by import. The major reasons for<br />

comparatively low growth <strong>in</strong> oil production are<br />

• No major discoveries of oil resources<br />

• Most oil fields are enter<strong>in</strong>g the natural decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g phase<br />

• Reservoir management problems <strong>in</strong> Mumbai high, Nedam &<br />

Gandhar etc.<br />

• Constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong> the North eastern region.<br />

59


- 18.$&4 . .;...<br />

.. +<br />

figure 3.9 Demand <strong>Supply</strong> Balance<br />

OverallDemand <strong>Supply</strong>Balance<br />

21.651<br />

It is clear from the figure 3.9 that India is lead<strong>in</strong>g to self-reliance <strong>in</strong> all the<br />

petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. Graph is drawn by deduct<strong>in</strong>g production from<br />

demand of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. The ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity as on 1.4.2002 was<br />

n6.07Million Metric Per Annum (MMTPA). Availability of petroleum products<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 2002-03 from domestic ref<strong>in</strong>eries was adequate to meet the domestic<br />

demand except for Liquefied <strong>Petroleum</strong> Gas (LPG).The availability of petrol and<br />

diesel is <strong>in</strong> excess ofdomestic requirement and the surplus quantity was exported<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the year. At present, there are 18 ref<strong>in</strong>eries operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the country, (16 <strong>in</strong><br />

Public Sector, one <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t sector, and one <strong>in</strong> private sector). Out ofthe 16 Public<br />

Sector ref<strong>in</strong>eries, 7 are owned by <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), two by<br />

Cbennai <strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Limited (subsidiary of WCL), two by H<strong>in</strong>dustan<br />

<strong>Petroleum</strong> Corporation Limited (HPCL) and one each by Bharat <strong>Petroleum</strong><br />

Corporation Limited (BPCL), Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited (KRL)(subsidiary of<br />

BPCL), Bongaigaon Ref<strong>in</strong>ery &Petrochemicals Limited (BRPL) (subsidiary of<br />

[OCL), Numaligarh Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited (NRL)(subsidiary of BPCL) and Oil and<br />

Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC). There is one ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t sector<br />

viz. Mangalore Ref<strong>in</strong>ery &Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) and one ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong><br />

11,167<br />

private sectorviz. Reliance Industries Limited (RPL).<br />

Import and Exports: The quantity ofcrude oil imported (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g JVC<br />

I private companies) between April and November 2002 was 55.609 MMT,<br />

valued Rs. 49,680 crore. Besides, 4-494 MMTof other petroleum products valued<br />

at Rs. 5,029 crore were also imported dur<strong>in</strong>g the same period. Exports of<br />

61<br />

.... \


petroleum products was 6.607MMT, valued at Rs. 6,364 crore dur<strong>in</strong>g the same<br />

period. Import of crude oil has been made free with effect from 1 st April, 2001.<br />

Further, Government decided <strong>in</strong> May, 2001 to allow public sector oil companies<br />

toexercise the option to import their crude oil requirement themselves under the<br />

actual user licens<strong>in</strong>g policy or through IOCL. With a view to improve oil security,<br />

the oil companies made efforts towards diversification of crude oil sourc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 2002-03.<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>eries' Pipel<strong>in</strong>e: Petronet India Limited (PIL) a non-PSD<br />

Company, has so far implemented Vad<strong>in</strong>ar - Kandla pipel<strong>in</strong>e and Kochi - Kurur<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e projects. Mangalore - Bangalore pipel<strong>in</strong>e project is at an advanced stage<br />

ofimplementation. To match the post APM scenario, MoP&NG vide notification<br />

F.No. P-20012/S/99-PP dated 20.11.2002 has issued guidel<strong>in</strong>es for lay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

petroleum product pipel<strong>in</strong>es. The new guidel<strong>in</strong>es for grant of right of user (RoD)<br />

<strong>in</strong> land do not contemplate any restrictions or conditions for grant of ROD for<br />

crude oil pipel<strong>in</strong>es. Product pipel<strong>in</strong>es have been categorized as follows:<br />

(i) Pipel<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from ref<strong>in</strong>eries, whether coastal or <strong>in</strong>land, upto a<br />

distance of around 300 kilometers from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery; (ii) Pipel<strong>in</strong>es dedicated for<br />

supply<strong>in</strong>g product to particular consumer, orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g either from a ref<strong>in</strong>ery or<br />

from oil company's term<strong>in</strong>al; and 23 pipel<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from ports and<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from ref<strong>in</strong>eries exceed<strong>in</strong>g 300 km <strong>in</strong> length, other than<br />

those specified <strong>in</strong> (i) & (ii) above. As per the guidel<strong>in</strong>es, companies and <strong>in</strong>vestors<br />

will have complete freedom <strong>in</strong> respect of the pipel<strong>in</strong>es orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

or meant for captive use of companies for which RoD will be unconditional. As<br />

per the notification, the pipel<strong>in</strong>es exceed<strong>in</strong>g 300 km <strong>in</strong> length and those<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from a port location, grant of RoD will be subjected to the fulfillment<br />

ofcerta<strong>in</strong> conditions, like:<br />

• Oil companies/<strong>in</strong>vestors <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> lay<strong>in</strong>g a product pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from a ref<strong>in</strong>ery or a port would be required to publish the<br />

proposal <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g other <strong>in</strong>terested companies to take capacity <strong>in</strong> the<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

• Any oil company <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g the capacity of the pipel<strong>in</strong>e, will<br />

be able to do so on mutually agreed commercial terms and conditions.<br />

62


3.3.3 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Capacities And Capacity Utilization<br />

To meet the grow<strong>in</strong>g demand of petroleum products, the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity<br />

<strong>in</strong>the country has been gradually <strong>in</strong>creased over the years by sett<strong>in</strong>g up of new<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the country as well as by expand<strong>in</strong>g the capacity of the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

• The ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity, actual crude throughput and capacity utilisation dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

lastfive years are <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Table 3.13<br />

Table 3.13 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity utilization <strong>in</strong> India<br />

3.3.4 Private Ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

-96 96-97 97-98 98-99<br />

62.2 62.2<br />

65.2 68.5<br />

102.9 104.7 8<br />

Government of India has welcomed proposal for private <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g foreign <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector follow<strong>in</strong>g liberalization of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial policy. In pursuance of this policy, letters of Intent have been granted<br />

to 14 companies for sett<strong>in</strong>g up of ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the private sector for about 70<br />

MMTPA capacity<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g EOU ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />

3.3.5 Future of <strong>Petroleum</strong> Industry<br />

Production from countries outside OPEC is expected to show a steady<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease, from around 47 million barrels per day <strong>in</strong> 2002 to about 62 million<br />

barrels per day by 2025. Total world demand for oil is expected to reach 112<br />

million barrels per day by 2020 and 133 million by 2025. Develop<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong><br />

Asia show the largest projected growth <strong>in</strong> demand, averag<strong>in</strong>g 3.3 percent per<br />

year, ledby Ch<strong>in</strong>a at 3.9 percent per year.<br />

3.3.6 Persian Gulf Producers Took More Than Half of World Oil Trade<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g the world market <strong>in</strong> crude oil exports, the historical peak for<br />

Persian Gulf exports (as a percent of world oil exports) occurred <strong>in</strong> 1974, when<br />

64


they made up more than two-thirds of the crude oil traded <strong>in</strong> world markets. The<br />

most recent historical low for Persian Gulf oil exports came <strong>in</strong> 1984 as a result of<br />

more than a decade of high oil prices, which led to significant reductions <strong>in</strong><br />

worldwide petroleum consumption. Less than 40 percent of the crude oil traded<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1984 came from Persian Gulf suppliers. Follow<strong>in</strong>g the 1985 oil price collapse,<br />

the Persian Gulf export percentage aga<strong>in</strong> began a gradual <strong>in</strong>crease, but it leveled<br />

off <strong>in</strong> the 1990S at 40 to 45 percent when non-OPEC supply proved to be<br />

unexpectedly resilient.<br />

Persian Gulf producers are expected to account for 45 percent of<br />

worldwide trade by 2007-for the first time s<strong>in</strong>ce the early 1980s. After 2007, the<br />

Persian Gulf share of worldwide petroleum exports is projected to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

gradually to 66 percent by 2025. In the low oil price case, the Persian Gulf share<br />

of total exports is projected to reach 76 percent by 2025. All Persian Gulf<br />

producers are expected to <strong>in</strong>crease oil production capacity significantly over the<br />

forecast period, and both Saudi Arabia and Iraq (assum<strong>in</strong>g the lift<strong>in</strong>g of United<br />

Nations export sanctions after 2003) are expected to nearly triple their current<br />

production capacity.<br />

3.3.7 Asia/Pacific Region is Expected to Surpass U.S. Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Capacity<br />

The Asia/Pacific region was the fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g center <strong>in</strong> the<br />

1990s.1t surpassed Western Europe as the world's second largest ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g center<br />

and, <strong>in</strong> terms of distillation capacity, is expected to surpass North America before<br />

2005. While not add<strong>in</strong>g significantly to their distillation capacity, ref<strong>in</strong>ers <strong>in</strong> the<br />

United States and Europe have tended to improve product quality and enhance<br />

the usefulness of heavier oils through <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> downstream capacity.<br />

Future <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery operations of develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

must <strong>in</strong>clude configurations that are more advanced than those currently <strong>in</strong><br />

operation. Their ref<strong>in</strong>eries will be called upon to meet <strong>in</strong>creased worldwide<br />

demand for lighter products, to upgrade residual fuel, to supply transportation<br />

fuels with reduced lead, and to supply both distillate and residual fuels with<br />

decreased sulfur levels. An additional burden on new ref<strong>in</strong>eries will be the need<br />

65


3.3.9 Logistics for <strong>Petroleum</strong> Products<br />

Transportation by ship and pipel<strong>in</strong>es are the two modes used <strong>in</strong> India for<br />

"<br />

Figure 3.10 <strong>Indian</strong> petroleum map<br />

J:<br />

'0<br />

the crude movement. Ship is the ma<strong>in</strong> mode of crude movement. Ship<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g is not that accurate <strong>in</strong> any part of the country. So the crude availability<br />

at any ref<strong>in</strong>ery, which depends on ship transport, cannot be planned correctly.<br />

This sometimes disturbs production. The demurrages are also high due to<br />

unplanned arrival of ships. Ports are also not hav<strong>in</strong>g most modern facilities. So<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g time is also higher at almost all the ports Rail, road, pipel<strong>in</strong>e and sea<br />

are the modes of conveyance for transport<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. Railway and road<br />

gives maximum service. Pipel<strong>in</strong>e supply is very limited. Pipel<strong>in</strong>e is used for<br />

supply<strong>in</strong>g to major <strong>in</strong>dustrial customers. Retail distribution is through road only.<br />

Rail wagons are used for bulk movement to areas where the direct supply by road<br />

is difficult because of distance. Wagons must be unloaded to tanks <strong>in</strong> the<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g yard and from there it is to be distributed by trucks to the retail<br />

outlets.<br />

67


Operat<strong>in</strong>g Cost<br />

70 10 so 100<br />

", +­ t-<br />

o 00 I-<br />

--_..<br />

Figure 3.11 Internal LOgIstICS costs InRef<strong>in</strong>ery Figure 3.12 Logistics Costs Vs capacity<br />

Ship can also be used to transport from ref<strong>in</strong>ery to coastal cities. This will<br />

be cheaper than rail and road transport. This facility is not be<strong>in</strong>g largely used <strong>in</strong><br />

India. It may require modification or modernization of exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities.<br />

Reliability of supply is not very good due to the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> rail and road<br />

transport. Movement of small quantities necessitates the need for frequent trips<br />

oftrucks and which <strong>in</strong> turn disturbs the scheduled movement. Operat<strong>in</strong>g cost of a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery is depended on through put of ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Through put is the crude oil<br />

processed by the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. If the through put is less than 60% of its <strong>in</strong>stalled<br />

capacity, operat<strong>in</strong>g cost will almost double at 20% of <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. Internal<br />

logistics costs are calculated by deduct<strong>in</strong>g operat<strong>in</strong>g costs from total production<br />

costs. Internal logistics costs are not available directly from any ref<strong>in</strong>ery data. So<br />

it is calculated as mentioned above and plotted aga<strong>in</strong>st the capacity of ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

As shown <strong>in</strong>figure 3.12 it is decreas<strong>in</strong>g almost l<strong>in</strong>early with <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. A<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery with 1.5 MMTPA has Rs. 60/tonne as logistics where as it is only Rs. 30<br />

for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery with 14MMTPA as <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery with high <strong>in</strong>stalled<br />

capacity willbe enjoy<strong>in</strong>g better <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics costs.<br />

3.3.10 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Objective<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> objective of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is meet<strong>in</strong>g product demand by produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sufficient volume of products. The product must be meet<strong>in</strong>g the specification laid<br />

by the Government. The <strong>in</strong>terest of ref<strong>in</strong>ery will be <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the cost of<br />

production to <strong>in</strong>crease the profit. In the decontrolled environment reduc<strong>in</strong>g cost<br />

of production will be essential to compete with imported products. <strong>Supply</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

products at the site ofcustomer to meet the demand is the ultimate objective of a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery to maximize their profit. Selection of crude oil is important because<br />

68<br />

"


transportation cost of crude oil is directly dependent on the distance of the<br />

load<strong>in</strong>g port. Sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> transportation can be treated as profit.<br />

• meet product demand<br />

crude • Make product on specification<br />

oil<br />

f------+ • M<strong>in</strong>imum cost Product<br />

feed • Maximum profit Demand<br />

stock<br />

Govt. of India is giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>centives for capacity utilization <strong>in</strong> full. So the<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries have been always try<strong>in</strong>g to maximize their throughput. This resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g more than the designed maximum capacity. If a new product is<br />

produced or more volume of exist<strong>in</strong>g product is produced, it will be difficult to<br />

sell the product immediately after the production It will lead to unnecessary<br />

product hold<strong>in</strong>g. This is a difficult situation for many ref<strong>in</strong>eries because storage<br />

capacity is a bottleneck. More over it adds cost to the product. All these problems<br />

are aris<strong>in</strong>g because the companies are look<strong>in</strong>g only on the volume of production<br />

and capacity utilization.<br />

3.4 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Location Selection Model<br />

Location of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is important as far as logistics is concerned. Many<br />

factors have to be considered for site selection. The general facility location<br />

problem is very well discussed <strong>in</strong> literature. Details are available <strong>in</strong> Khumawala<br />

[1971], Klassen [1994], and MacCormek [1994]. The factors considered <strong>in</strong> the<br />

general location problem have to be prioritised for ref<strong>in</strong>ery site selection and<br />

other relevant factors added. Here a four stage decision model for ref<strong>in</strong>ery site<br />

selection is presented. In the first stage alternative locations are generated, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

second stage a Pass/ Fail criterion is applied to elim<strong>in</strong>ate sites not suitable, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

third stage a logistic cost comparison is done to rank the alternatives based on<br />

logistics cost. F<strong>in</strong>ally a few top rank alternatives are compared us<strong>in</strong>g weighted<br />

factor method to arrive the site to be selected.<br />

69


3.4.1 Generation of Alternatives<br />

Location of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery can be anywhere <strong>in</strong> the world because crude is<br />

transported from few parts of the world to the rest of the world. Transport<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crude oil is easier and cheaper than transport<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. To optimize<br />

the expense <strong>in</strong> transport, location of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery plays a vital role. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

location is the first step <strong>in</strong> the process. Important factors to be considered for the<br />

generation of alternatives for location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are :<br />

• Near source of crude oil<br />

• Port site<br />

• Pipel<strong>in</strong>e grid for crude oil<br />

• Presence of bulk <strong>in</strong>dustrial customers<br />

• Connectivityto rail<br />

• Highwayl<strong>in</strong>kages<br />

Nearness of port is very important because the bulk movement of crude oil<br />

and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products can take place only through sea. Companies, which are<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g to export products, will be able to do it through sea only. So the location<br />

must be near to the port. Crude oil has to be brought <strong>in</strong> large quantities to a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Ship is one commonly used mode of transport but pipel<strong>in</strong>e is much<br />

more cheaper. Lay<strong>in</strong>g a new l<strong>in</strong>e for ref<strong>in</strong>ery may not be economic and feasible.<br />

Sett<strong>in</strong>g up ref<strong>in</strong>ery near an exist<strong>in</strong>g crude oil pipel<strong>in</strong>e will be a more economic<br />

alternative. So the nearness to the pipel<strong>in</strong>e grid is an important factor for<br />

select<strong>in</strong>g the location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Nearness or access to supply is essential.<br />

Similarly access to customers, especially<strong>in</strong>dustrial customers s<strong>in</strong>ce they consume<br />

bulk quantities, is also important. Nearness to railhead also must be considered<br />

because it is the cheapest mode of conveyance on land. It will be essential to<br />

move the products <strong>in</strong> wagons also. Highwayl<strong>in</strong>kage is also vital for supply<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the customers <strong>in</strong> the nearby places.<br />

3.4.2 Pass I Fail Criteria<br />

Identification of alternative location process for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery will provide a<br />

lot of sites. For select<strong>in</strong>g the right location each location must be checked first<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st some critical factors like environmental regulations, taxes by<br />

Governments, availability of water, availability of land etc. Locations which are<br />

70


fail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> these factors must be removed. Ifa government does not give license for<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries then any location <strong>in</strong> the state or the nation cannot be selected. So such<br />

locationfail <strong>in</strong> the test and must be removed from the list.<br />

3.4.3 Cost Comparison Us<strong>in</strong>g Spread Sheet<br />

Major cost components <strong>in</strong> logistics are <strong>in</strong>bound logistic cost, production<br />

cost and outbound logistic cost. In the selection of location problem, process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cost can be avoided because it is constant. M<strong>in</strong>imum distance for transport<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ed products is taken as 50 km because the chance of complete distribution of<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ed products with<strong>in</strong> 50 km is almost impossible. Expense for multiples of<br />

each fifty km is used for calculation. Sum of <strong>in</strong>bound logistic cost and outbound<br />

logistic cost for each location is calculated us<strong>in</strong>g spreadsheet and the list of<br />

location is made <strong>in</strong> the ascend<strong>in</strong>g order.<br />

Factors<br />

Cost<br />

Factors<br />

Pass I Fail Criterion<br />

Cost Comparison<br />

Weightage allocation<br />

Pass<br />

Cost below uooer limit<br />

Highest<br />

Fail<br />

Cost above upper limit<br />

Low Weightage<br />

fiaure 3.13 Model for Location Selection<br />

Cut off on the list can be 50% higher than the least cost. Reason for fix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the 50% higher is that it should not cross the least when other criterion is<br />

applied. Selection of alternatives at this stage can be made by select<strong>in</strong>g first n<br />

numbers. For example first 5 locations can be selected from the total selected<br />

locations. These five locations will be considered for further detailed analysis.<br />

71


3.4.4 Scheme for Cost Calculation<br />

Pipel<strong>in</strong>e has only capital <strong>in</strong>vestment as the major component. Operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cost is the least. Transportation cost can be calculated <strong>in</strong> rupees per tonne per<br />

kilometer. Total cost of transportation can be taken as Rs.X. Shipp<strong>in</strong>g charges for<br />

crude as well as for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products can be calculated on the basis of distance<br />

multiplied with rate <strong>in</strong> rupees per tonne per kilometer. Port charges per tonne<br />

must be added to it separately because port charges vary from port to port. Total<br />

ofshipcharges can be taken as Rs.Y. Railwaycharges can be calculated by add<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fixed m<strong>in</strong>imum charge for an order with the cost of transport<strong>in</strong>g per tonne per<br />

kilometer. Total can be taken as Rs.Z for railway. Road transport cost can be<br />

calculated on the basis of distance transported per tone per kilometer. M<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

charge is fixed for transport<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> 50 kilometers from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Total cost<br />

oftransportation us<strong>in</strong>g truck can be taken as Rs.W. Us<strong>in</strong>g this method <strong>in</strong>bound<br />

variable logistic costs and outbound logistics costs can be used for the screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

oflocations primarily selected. Table 3.15 gives the method of calculation for each<br />

location. For example, a location <strong>in</strong> south will be hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>bound and outbound<br />

logistics costs. Inbound logistic cost <strong>in</strong>volves pipel<strong>in</strong>e and shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transportation costs (X+Y). Outbound logistics cost <strong>in</strong>volves pipel<strong>in</strong>e + sea + rail<br />

+ road and the sum of all <strong>in</strong>dividual costs is the total outbound logistics cost.<br />

Grant total is the sum of <strong>in</strong>bound and outbound logistics cost. Total cost can be<br />

compared and decision can be taken for select<strong>in</strong>g the number of locations for<br />

detailed analysis.<br />

Table 3.15 Cost comparison us<strong>in</strong>g Spreadsheet<br />

SI. No. Location (nbound Cost Outbound Cost Total Cost<br />

1 South X+Y X+Y+Z+W 2X+2Y+Z+W<br />

2 North X+Y X+Y+Z+W 2X+2Y+Z+W<br />

3 East X+Y X+Y+Z+W 2X+2Y+Z+W<br />

4 West X+Y X+Y+Z+W 2X+2Y+Z+W<br />

5 Middle X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />

6 Middle East X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />

7 Middle South X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />

8 Middle West X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />

9 Middle North X+Y X+Z+W 2X+Y+Z+W<br />

72


3.4.5 Factors for Selection of Location<br />

Factor comparison method is commonly adopted for selection of location<br />

for <strong>in</strong>dustrial units. Francis [1992] and Ritzman [1990] have suggested<br />

procedures for identify<strong>in</strong>g location. Same method with additional features is<br />

used for identify<strong>in</strong>g important factors as far as a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is concerned. General<br />

Factors for location selection for an <strong>in</strong>dustry are discussed below.<br />

• Availability of Land<br />

• Cost of land<br />

• Transportation facility<br />

• Availability of labour<br />

• VVagesforlabour<br />

• Information Technology<br />

• Availability of power and water<br />

• Support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

• Quality of life like school, hospital<br />

• Nearness to market<br />

• Build<strong>in</strong>g of site<br />

• Availability of Skilled employees like manager<br />

• Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for workers and foreman<br />

• Security<br />

• Expansion of site<br />

• Taxes<br />

• Government support<br />

• Union problem and <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations<br />

• Environmental relations<br />

• VVaste disposal<br />

• Location of sub contractors, retailers etc.<br />

• Incentives form f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

• Climatic conditions<br />

All these factors are not important for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Factors, which are<br />

important for the site selection of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, are found out <strong>in</strong> discussion with<br />

senior people <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Procedure is discussed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> next section. The<br />

selected factors are given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.16. The selected factors from the full list are<br />

reduced to n<strong>in</strong>e and they are assigned with weightage <strong>in</strong> Table 3.17 and these<br />

factors areused for further analysis.<br />

73


One day's journey 80


more than 50 percentage of the participants were taken as score. In majority of<br />

the factors more than 90% were hav<strong>in</strong>g the same op<strong>in</strong>ion. There was a variation<br />

of 10% <strong>in</strong> the op<strong>in</strong>ion collected from the participants. For the eas<strong>in</strong>ess of<br />

calculation it was neglected. Selection was made by the participant on the table<br />

given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.16. After consolidat<strong>in</strong>g the scores, codes were assigned to each<br />

factor. Code 'A' for nearness of raw material was assigned and 'B' for security. All<br />

the factors were given the codes as given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.16. Same group of people<br />

were assigned with the task of giv<strong>in</strong>g the pair wise comparison. In this case the<br />

variation was only 9%. Those values are tabulated <strong>in</strong> Table 3.19. Three choices<br />

were given for the selection. They are m<strong>in</strong>or, medium, and major. As shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 3.18, 'A' is compared with 'B' and the value will be entered <strong>in</strong> the column of<br />

'B'. In the case the nearness of material is major when compared with security<br />

and 93% of the participants were of the same op<strong>in</strong>ion. So '1\3" is assigned <strong>in</strong><br />

column of 'B' aga<strong>in</strong>st the row of 'A'. Similarly 'A' is compared with C,D,E,F,G,H,<br />

and I. Same procedure was cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> the case of all the factors. After mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

all the entries it used for calculat<strong>in</strong>g weightages. Number of correspond<strong>in</strong>g values<br />

<strong>in</strong> each square aga<strong>in</strong>st each factor was added up to get the value <strong>in</strong> column of<br />

score. Values of the same factor only were used for the calculation. In the row of<br />

'A', valuesof 'A' only was considered for the calculation of score. Value of 'F' was<br />

not used for calculation. In the case of score for 'F', first values of 'F' <strong>in</strong> the<br />

column was added and that value was added with the sum values <strong>in</strong> the row of 'F'.<br />

Scores of all the factors are calculated <strong>in</strong> this way. Total of all those scores were<br />

calculated to f<strong>in</strong>d out the weightages. Total value of the scores of the factors was<br />

calculated as 78. Percentage weightage was calculated by divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

factor scorewith total factor score.<br />

After the completion of allocation of scores <strong>in</strong> the matrix the total<br />

score (Si) aga<strong>in</strong>st each factor score is calculated. Score values <strong>in</strong> the rows and<br />

columns are added to get the f<strong>in</strong>al score. For example<br />

76


Score of C = [Sum of scores <strong>in</strong> Column» 2+Sum of row = 2+2+2 = 6 ]2+6=8 and<br />

Score ofF= [Sum ofscores <strong>in</strong> Column 2+3+2+3 = 10+ Sum ofraw=1+3=4]= 10+4 =14<br />

Sum of scores (LSi) is calculated to f<strong>in</strong>d out percentage weight.<br />

Percentageweight = Wi = Si / LSi<br />

Forexample Percentage weight of factor A = 17/78 = 0.218<br />

Table 3.19 Preference Matrixes<br />

A B C 0 E F G H I<br />

Score<br />

(Si)<br />

%wt(Wi)<br />

A A3 A1 A3 A3 F2 A2 2 3 17 0.218<br />

8 C2 81 83 F3 G1 H2 11 4 0.052<br />

C C2 C2 F2 G2 H1 C2 8 0.102<br />

0 03 F3 G2 H2 12 3 0.038<br />

E E2 G2 H3 12 2 0.026<br />

F F1 F3 11 14 0.179<br />

G H2 11 7 0.090<br />

H H3 13 0.167<br />

I 10 0.128<br />

78 1.00<br />

After calculat<strong>in</strong>g Wi of each factor, the locations under consideration were<br />

tabulated as given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.19. Locations are considered with respect to each<br />

factor. Location I is considered for Factor Al (nearness to raw material) and<br />

weightage is given on loo-po<strong>in</strong>t scale. For m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g subjectivity, nearness to<br />

raw material is divided <strong>in</strong>to five classes and weightages are given. Table 3.17gives<br />

the detailed guide l<strong>in</strong>es for assign<strong>in</strong>g weightage for each factor. Selection of<br />

weightage was done on the basis of <strong>in</strong>terviews and discussions with senior level<br />

people <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>eries. In this example the value of A is 70 (ail), value of B is 80<br />

(aiz) and so on. Then the value of A was multiplied by its percentage weightage<br />

(0.218).<br />

77


Flexibility for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is essential because (1) demand pattern changes,<br />

(zjprice changes, (3)possibility of develop<strong>in</strong>g substitute fuels, (4)possibility of<br />

new market like new solvent, and(s) political <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>in</strong> some crude supply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries. Demand pattern changes due to changes <strong>in</strong> climate or changes <strong>in</strong><br />

production pattern <strong>in</strong> consumer <strong>in</strong>dustries or political reasons. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be<br />

able to adjust with changes <strong>in</strong> the market. This will reduce the <strong>in</strong>ventory. Ifrigid<br />

production pattern is adopted, possibility for hold<strong>in</strong>g of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products also will<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease. Price of crude oil as well as ref<strong>in</strong>ed products changes <strong>in</strong> the market.<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be flexible to accommodate the changes and to <strong>in</strong>crease the profit.<br />

Possibility of substitute fuels like alcohol or liquefied natural gas may lead to<br />

reduction <strong>in</strong> demand for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. To <strong>in</strong>crease profitability, ref<strong>in</strong>ery must<br />

be able to change the product mix to cope up with the product demand. Demand<br />

for new products may come up <strong>in</strong> the market. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be competent to<br />

cater to the demand for new products also, or else some other ref<strong>in</strong>eries will<br />

supply the product. It is not good <strong>in</strong> a competitive market. Political <strong>in</strong>stabilities<br />

also can change the crude supply. So ref<strong>in</strong>ery must have facilities to process<br />

variety of crude oil to withstand the changes <strong>in</strong> demand. Flexibility to the<br />

maximum possible level will <strong>in</strong>crease the freedom to select crude oil and supply<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ed products to any market.<br />

Figure 3.14 Relationship diagram<br />

79


Figure 3.14 illustrates how flexibility, <strong>in</strong>ventories, and customer service<br />

are <strong>in</strong>terrelated. The components of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g flexibility play an important<br />

role <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> flexibility. However, as the supply cha<strong>in</strong> extends beyond the<br />

enterprise, supply cha<strong>in</strong> flexibility must also extend beyond one firm's <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

flexibility. Most of the responsibility for one type of flexibility lies with<strong>in</strong> one<br />

functional area of a particular firm. In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery production department is<br />

generally responsible for volume flexibility, market<strong>in</strong>g is generally responsible for<br />

distribution flexibility, laboratory is responsible for new production <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

flexibility etc. Byfocus<strong>in</strong>g on the flexibilityfrom an <strong>in</strong>ternal perspective, much of<br />

theconcentration on supply cha<strong>in</strong> perspective is lost. Figure 3.15 shows the major<br />

components of logistic flexibility for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery from facility po<strong>in</strong>t of view. Each<br />

component is expla<strong>in</strong>ed below.<br />

3.5.2 Oil Field Flexibility<br />

Crude oil is available <strong>in</strong> different parts of the world <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g India as<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Table 3.21. Crude oil available at all the places are not of the same<br />

quality. Gravity and sulfur content of crude oil ma<strong>in</strong>ly decide quality. Table 3.19<br />

shows the quality of crude oil at different oil fields.<br />

Table 3.21 Oil and condensate <strong>in</strong> billion barrel<br />

Region<br />

Cumulative<br />

production so far<br />

Total discovered<br />

North America 238 277<br />

Lat<strong>in</strong> America 101 177<br />

Europe 40 77<br />

North Africa 43 88<br />

C/S Africa 27 59<br />

Middle East 218 742<br />

Far east Australial<br />

Asia<br />

59 144<br />

CIS 128 297<br />

Opec 330 941<br />

Non -Opec 524 890<br />

World 854 1831<br />

Selection of crude is not only dependent on the quality but also the<br />

distance of oil field from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, process<strong>in</strong>g capability of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery and<br />

product demand <strong>in</strong> the market. For improv<strong>in</strong>g productivity and profit crude oil<br />

81


carriers must be employed for transportation. So standard types of ref<strong>in</strong>eries will<br />

not have capacity to receive and stock crude oil brought by Suez Max ships.<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>eries can share this by lighter<strong>in</strong>g crude oil to small ships. So the flexibility <strong>in</strong><br />

availability of different quantity can be enjoyed by small ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />

'"<br />

Table 3.23 Crude oil properties atdifferent locations<br />

Country<br />

MIDDLE EAST<br />

Abu Dhabi<br />

Abu Dhabi<br />

Abu Dhabi<br />

Abu Dhabi<br />

Divided zone<br />

Divided zone<br />

E t<br />

Iran<br />

Iran<br />

Ira<br />

Ira<br />

Kuwait<br />

Oman<br />

Qatar<br />

Qatar<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Kole Mar<strong>in</strong>e blend<br />

Mand'j<br />

Bonn Li ht<br />

Bonn Medium<br />

Brass river<br />

Forcados Blend<br />

Qua Iboe<br />

83<br />

Gravity<br />

o API<br />

40.5 0.78<br />

37.5 1.51<br />

40.6 1.05<br />

31.1 2.00<br />

32.8 1.91<br />

28.5 2.85<br />

31.9 1.52<br />

31.0 1.65<br />

33.8 1.35<br />

33.7 1.95<br />

35.1 1.97<br />

31.4 2.52<br />

36.3 0.79<br />

41.7 1.28<br />

35.3 1.57<br />

27.9 2.85<br />

33.4 1.79<br />

37.8 1.19<br />

30.8 2.40<br />

34.9<br />

30.5<br />

36.7<br />

25.2<br />

40.9<br />

29.7<br />

35.8


Country Crude Gravity 0 Sulfur<br />

API Wt%<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Indonesia<br />

Sumatra<br />

Sumatra<br />

Common wealth of<br />

Inde endent states<br />

Saharan Blend<br />

Zarzaita<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Amna<br />

Bre a<br />

Es Sider<br />

Sarir<br />

Sirtica<br />

Zueit<strong>in</strong>a<br />

3.5.5 Crude Oil Storage Flexibility<br />

45.5<br />

43.0<br />

36.1<br />

40.4<br />

36.7<br />

38.3<br />

43.3<br />

33.4<br />

21.1<br />

34.5<br />

32.5<br />

0.53<br />

0.07<br />

0.15<br />

0.21<br />

0.37<br />

0.18<br />

0.43<br />

0.08<br />

0.20<br />

0.08<br />

1.38<br />

Crude oil can be stored <strong>in</strong> storage tanks <strong>in</strong> the tank farm of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. It<br />

can also be stored <strong>in</strong> float<strong>in</strong>g tanks <strong>in</strong> outer sea also. Tanks can be connected to<br />

one tank to another so that crude oil can be pumped from each other. The<br />

flexibility <strong>in</strong> storage reduces the storage capacity requirement for crude oil, which<br />

<strong>in</strong> turn reduces capital <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />

3.5.6 Process Flexibility<br />

Normal ref<strong>in</strong>eries cannot process all variety of crude oils <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

distillation column. M<strong>in</strong>imum two distillation columns are required for<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g low sulfur and high sulfur crude oils. A good ref<strong>in</strong>ery must have<br />

84


flexibility <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g a large variety of crude oils. Quality is the other area,<br />

which requires flexibility. Product demand decides the crude oil to be processed.<br />

This reduces the variety of crude oils that can be purchased. The flexibility for<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g any type of crude <strong>in</strong> any quantity will improve the profitability of<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

3.5.7 Intermediate Storage Flexibility<br />

Transferr<strong>in</strong>g from first distillation column to f<strong>in</strong>al processes is not always<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous. So <strong>in</strong>termediate storage tanks are essential to store the products<br />

wait<strong>in</strong>g for further process<strong>in</strong>g to upgrade the product. The flexibility can be<br />

improved by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the capacity and <strong>in</strong>terconnection between tanks. Capacity<br />

<strong>in</strong>crements can be <strong>in</strong> terms of number of tanks rather than a few number of large<br />

size tanks. Variety of products can be <strong>in</strong>creased by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />

storage. This will improve productivity of ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

3.5.8 F<strong>in</strong>al Process Flexibility<br />

Technologyfor any process is available <strong>in</strong> the market. Selection of process<br />

like super oil crack<strong>in</strong>g (SaC), Hydro crack<strong>in</strong>g, reform<strong>in</strong>g etc. decides the product<br />

variety and quality. The higher the variety and quality, the better will be the ga<strong>in</strong>.<br />

By add<strong>in</strong>g different processes, required type of products can be produced. All the<br />

variety of products produced need not have sufficient market. Increased<br />

flexibility <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al process will make a ref<strong>in</strong>ery equipped to produce high value<br />

products <strong>in</strong> the desired volume. It will <strong>in</strong>crease profitability of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

3.5.9 Stream Storage Flexibility<br />

Products runn<strong>in</strong>g out of distillation columns without any addition to it are<br />

called stream. Keep<strong>in</strong>g them may help <strong>in</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g the product specifications.<br />

Facility for storage of this stream will improve product variety, which will <strong>in</strong> turn<br />

satisfy customer <strong>in</strong> a better way. Different tanks must be provided for stor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

different streams and <strong>in</strong>terconnectivity is desirable for better capacity utilization.<br />

3.5.10 Blend<strong>in</strong>g Flexibility<br />

In the short term, tighten<strong>in</strong>g fuel specifications may result <strong>in</strong> a bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

hedache, but <strong>in</strong> the long run it will open up new market<strong>in</strong>g opportunities.<br />

85


Blend<strong>in</strong>g is the process of mix<strong>in</strong>g different streams to get desired specification of<br />

a product. Product blend<strong>in</strong>g area is receiv<strong>in</strong>g much attention by many ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

aroundthe world. Follow<strong>in</strong>g are the ma<strong>in</strong> reasons.<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g is the area that is best understood <strong>in</strong> terms of qualified benefits<br />

from improvement.<br />

Traditional blend<strong>in</strong>g has required a significant number of dedicated tanks.<br />

As demand pattern changes, opportunity sales may be very profiTable.<br />

Accommodat<strong>in</strong>g opportunity sales may well place severe stra<strong>in</strong> on the f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

product tankage and associated load<strong>in</strong>g facilities.<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g requires a significant amount of manpower support, both off site<br />

andlaboratory manpower.<br />

The major types of blend<strong>in</strong>g are batch blend<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g streams to a tank conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a product does batch blend<strong>in</strong>g. Quantity of<br />

addition of new stream as directed from the laboratory depends upon the<br />

specifications of the product <strong>in</strong> the tank.<br />

In l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g is done at the time of either fill<strong>in</strong>g the tank or while<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g to the tanker. Four types of <strong>in</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>in</strong> practice.<br />

• Component to f<strong>in</strong>ished product<br />

• Component to load<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Rundown to f<strong>in</strong>ished product/ load<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Rundown to base<br />

Depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the demand for the variety of the product, anyone of the<br />

above methods can be used for blend<strong>in</strong>g. Anyway batch blend<strong>in</strong>g can be<br />

employed if the market<strong>in</strong>g is limited to local market. Flexibility <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g can<br />

be employed only through <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the variety of product, which can be<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed by delay<strong>in</strong>g blend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3.5.11 F<strong>in</strong>al Product Storage Flexibility<br />

Blended stream with accurate specification is called f<strong>in</strong>al product. This is<br />

ready to market and will have assured demand. In the f<strong>in</strong>al product, quantity can<br />

be flexible. Fast mov<strong>in</strong>g items with standard specification can be stored as<br />

86


products to improve the speed of delivery. It is difficult to store all the variety<br />

products <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al product storage tanks. Less mov<strong>in</strong>g and special products can<br />

be blended at the time of load<strong>in</strong>g to reduce the <strong>in</strong>ventory level. Demand for<br />

number of tanks will be high for stor<strong>in</strong>g all the products as products. To <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

flexibility the variety of f<strong>in</strong>al products stored must be the m<strong>in</strong>imum. Maximize<br />

the volume of fast mov<strong>in</strong>g products to improve flexibility.<br />

3.5.12 Outbound Transportation Flexibility<br />

Transportation of products from ref<strong>in</strong>ery to retail outlet or customer is<br />

known as outbound transportation. Pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship, wagon, and trucks are the<br />

commonly used modes of transport. Pipel<strong>in</strong>e can be used for supply<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

customers who buy huge quantities on regular basis or to distribution station at a<br />

distant places. This is the most economic mode of conveyance. Pipel<strong>in</strong>es are<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g used to supply LPG for domestic consumption also <strong>in</strong> metropolitan cities<br />

like Mumbai. Ship is used for transport<strong>in</strong>g product to far off places <strong>in</strong> the country<br />

or for export<strong>in</strong>g. In India products are not exported because our domestic<br />

production is not even sufficient for <strong>in</strong>ternal use. Only constra<strong>in</strong>t of ship<br />

transport is the need for port on both ends. So this is feasible for coastal<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries and coastal cities. Rail can be used for transport<strong>in</strong>g petroleum products<br />

from ref<strong>in</strong>ery to another city, which is far off from sea or port. Quantities of<br />

movement will be less because of the capacity limits of locomotives and load<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and unload<strong>in</strong>g facility constra<strong>in</strong>ts. If the railway system is not efficient, it will<br />

take moretime to move products when compared to ship. Ifship is not accessible<br />

then railis the best option for bulk transport. Trucks are mostly used to move the<br />

product from distribution center to retail outlet. 70km is normally seen as<br />

maximum limit for economic road transport. Profitability will be lesser if the<br />

distance is more than 70 km. The distance is a matter of demand also. If the<br />

demand is less, def<strong>in</strong>itely road will be better option because the capital<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment is m<strong>in</strong>imum. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery must have flexibility <strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g any mode of<br />

transport. For better profitability a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of all modes of transport must be<br />

possible <strong>in</strong> any ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

87


Table 3.24 Flexibility areas and theirimpacts<br />

Flexibility area Key factors Impact<br />

Oil field<br />

Sulfur Content<br />

Specific Gravity<br />

Less production cost<br />

Lighter products<br />

Ship size Less cost<br />

Inbound Transport Distance Moe quantity<br />

Pump<strong>in</strong>Q rate Fast discharge<br />

Availability Less cost<br />

Crude supply Price Fast movement<br />

Transport cost Less <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

Crude storage<br />

Tank connectivity<br />

Types ofcrude<br />

Less <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

Better schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Variety ofcrude More products<br />

Process Availability ofcrude Less <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

Capacity Better capacity utilisation<br />

Connectivity between tanks Better utilization oftanks<br />

Intermediate storage<br />

Size oftanks<br />

Variety ofproducts<br />

Quantity ofproducts<br />

More products<br />

More flexible process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Technology adopted Flexibility <strong>in</strong> crude<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al process Investment capacity High value products<br />

Better netback<br />

Stream storage<br />

Connectivity between tanks<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g practice<br />

More variety ofproducts<br />

Less tankage<br />

Type ofblend<strong>in</strong>g Less tank capacity<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Product specification<br />

Variety ofproducts<br />

More variety ofproducts<br />

Flexibilty <strong>in</strong> product<br />

specification<br />

Specification ofproducts Customer satisfaction<br />

Product storage<br />

Type ofblend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Variety ofproducts<br />

Availability ofmore<br />

products<br />

Better process control<br />

Mode oftransport available Fast delivery<br />

Outbound transport<br />

Cost ofeach mode<br />

Location ofref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

Demand ofQuantity<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> to any market<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> ofany quantity<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g procedure Increased product variety<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> Product storage Increased product quantity<br />

Transportation <strong>Supply</strong> to any location<br />

Storage capacity Service Increased customer<br />

Retailer<br />

Information Technology satisfaction<br />

Faster <strong>in</strong>formation to<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

3.5.13 Product Demand Flexibility<br />

A good ref<strong>in</strong>ery must be able to supply any quantity of product as per the<br />

specification given by the customer. This can be atta<strong>in</strong>ed only by the comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

88


of flexibility <strong>in</strong> blend<strong>in</strong>g, f<strong>in</strong>al product storage and transportation. <strong>Supply</strong><br />

flexibility will improve customer satisfaction and brand loyalty.<br />

3.5.14 Distribution Channel Flexibility<br />

Retail outlets-br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g product from ref<strong>in</strong>ery and distributes- is termed<br />

supplier. The supplier at each area must be able to sell products with<br />

specification suiTable for that area. For example the outlets at high ranges must<br />

beable to supply diesel with low cetane number to have better ignition but cetane<br />

number can be high <strong>in</strong> cities and level roads to reduce the possibility of fire at the<br />

time of accident. Facilities at each supplier must be similar so that the customer<br />

will not feel any difference between places. By us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology<br />

customers can be given the freedom to enjoy card facility and help l<strong>in</strong>es also. The<br />

flexibility will improve customer loyalty and <strong>in</strong> turn will improve profitability of a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

3.6 Process Selection for an Oil Ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> India<br />

A ref<strong>in</strong>ery is a factory just as a paper mill, which turns lumber <strong>in</strong>to legal<br />

pads or a glasswork, which turns silica <strong>in</strong>to stemware. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery takes a raw<br />

material-crude oil--and transforms it <strong>in</strong>to gasol<strong>in</strong>e and hundreds of other useful<br />

products. A typical large ref<strong>in</strong>ery costs billions of dollars to build and millions<br />

more to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> and upgrade. It runs around the clock 365 days a year, employs<br />

between 1,000 to 2,000 people and occupies as much land as several hundred<br />

football fields. Today, some ref<strong>in</strong>eries can turn more than half of every 42-gallon<br />

barrel of crude oil <strong>in</strong>to gasol<strong>in</strong>e. That's a remarkable technological improvement<br />

from 70 years ago, when only 11 gallons of gasol<strong>in</strong>e could be produced from a<br />

barrel of crude oil. How does this transformation take place? Essentially, ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

breaks crude oil down <strong>in</strong>to its various components, which then are selectively<br />

reconfigured <strong>in</strong>to new products. The complexity of this equipment varies from<br />

one ref<strong>in</strong>ery to the next. In general, the more sophisticated a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the better<br />

its ability to upgrade crude oil <strong>in</strong>to high-value products. Whether simple or<br />

complex, however, all ref<strong>in</strong>eries perform three basic steps: separation, conversion<br />

and treatment.<br />

89


3.6.1 Separation: Heavy on Bottom, Light on Top<br />

Modern separation, which is not much different from the "cook<strong>in</strong>g"<br />

methods used at the Pico Canyon stills, <strong>in</strong>volves pip<strong>in</strong>g oil through hot furnaces.<br />

The result<strong>in</strong>g liquids and vapors are discharged <strong>in</strong>to distillation towers. The tall<br />

narrow columns give ref<strong>in</strong>eries their dist<strong>in</strong>ctive skyl<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Inside the towers, the liquids and vapours separate <strong>in</strong>to components or<br />

fractions accord<strong>in</strong>g to weight and boil<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t. The lightest fractions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

gasol<strong>in</strong>e and liquid petroleum gas (LPG), vaporize and rise to the top of the<br />

tower, where they condense back to liquids. Medium weight liquids, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

kerosene and diesel oil distillates, stay <strong>in</strong> the middle. Heavier liquids, called gas<br />

oils, separate lower down, while the heaviest fractions with the highest boil<strong>in</strong>g<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts settle at the bottom. These tar like fractions, called residuum, are<br />

literally the 'bottom of the barrel'. The fractions now are ready for pip<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

next station or plant with<strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Some components require relatively<br />

little additional process<strong>in</strong>g to become asphalt base or jet fuel. However, most<br />

molecules that are dest<strong>in</strong>ed to become high-value products require much more<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g. This is where ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g's fanciest footwork takes place-where fractions<br />

from the distillation towers are transformed <strong>in</strong>to streams (<strong>in</strong>termediate<br />

components) that eventually become f<strong>in</strong>ished products. This is where a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

makes money, because only through conversion can most low-value fractions<br />

become gasol<strong>in</strong>e. The most widely used conversion method is called crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

because it uses heat and pressure to "crack" heavy hydrocarbon molecules <strong>in</strong>to<br />

lighter ones. A crack<strong>in</strong>g unit consists of one or more tall, thick-walled, bullet­<br />

shaped reactors and a network of furnaces, heat exchangers and other vessels.<br />

Fluid catalytic crack<strong>in</strong>g, or "cat crack<strong>in</strong>g," is the basic gasol<strong>in</strong>e-mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

process. Us<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>tense heat (about 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit), low pressure and a<br />

powdered catalyst (a substance that accelerates chemical reactions), the cat<br />

cracker can convert most relatively heavy fractions <strong>in</strong>to smaller gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

molecules. Hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g applies the same pr<strong>in</strong>ciples but uses a different<br />

catalyst, slightly lower temperatures, much greater pressure and hydrogen to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> chemical reactions. Although not all ref<strong>in</strong>eries employ hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Chevron is an <strong>in</strong>dustry leader <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g this technology to cost-effectively convert<br />

90


medium- to heavyweight gas oils <strong>in</strong>to high-value streams. The company's<br />

patented hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g process, which takes place <strong>in</strong> the Isocracker unit,<br />

produces mostly gasol<strong>in</strong>e and jet fuel.<br />

Some Chevron ref<strong>in</strong>eries also have cokers, which use heat and moderate<br />

pressure to turn residuum <strong>in</strong>to lighter products and a hard, coal like substance<br />

that is used as an <strong>in</strong>dustrial fuel. Cokers are among the more peculiar-look<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery structures. They resemble a series of giant drums with metal derricks on<br />

top. Crack<strong>in</strong>g and cok<strong>in</strong>g are not the only forms of conversion. Other ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

processes, <strong>in</strong>stead of splitt<strong>in</strong>g molecules, rearrange them to add value.<br />

Alkylation, for example, makes gasol<strong>in</strong>e components by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g some of the<br />

gaseous byproducts of crack<strong>in</strong>g. The process, which essentially is crack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

reverse, takes place <strong>in</strong> a series of large, horizontal vessels and tall, sk<strong>in</strong>ny towers<br />

that loom above other ref<strong>in</strong>ery structures. Reform<strong>in</strong>g uses heat, moderate<br />

pressure and catalysts to turn naphtha, a light, relatively low-value fraction, <strong>in</strong>to<br />

high-octane gasol<strong>in</strong>e components<br />

3.6.2 Treatment: the f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g touch<br />

A major portion of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves blend<strong>in</strong>g, purify<strong>in</strong>g, f<strong>in</strong>e-tun<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

otherwise improv<strong>in</strong>g products to meet the requirements.<br />

To make gasol<strong>in</strong>e, ref<strong>in</strong>ery technicians carefully comb<strong>in</strong>e a variety of<br />

streams from the process<strong>in</strong>g units. Among the variables that determ<strong>in</strong>e the blend<br />

are octane level, vapor pressure rat<strong>in</strong>gs and special considerations, such as<br />

whether the gasol<strong>in</strong>e will be used at high altitudes. Technicians also add dyes that<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish the various grades of fuel.<br />

3.6.3 Classification of Ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

Atmospheric distillation is the first processes <strong>in</strong> crude oil process<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

different basic streams are separated from the crude oil. While the available<br />

crude oil becomes heavier (high sulfur) and there is decreas<strong>in</strong>g demand for fuel<br />

oil, new technologies are to be adopted for reduction of the bottom of the barrel.<br />

The bottom of the barrel is low quality and less demand<strong>in</strong>g products, three up<br />

gradation routes are available for bottom residue. They are<br />

91


1. Carbon Rejection<br />

• Delayed cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Visbreak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Fluid cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Flexi Cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Residue fractional catalyst crack<strong>in</strong>g (FCC)<br />

Table 3.25 Ref<strong>in</strong>ery upgradation options<br />

Upgrad<strong>in</strong>g Processes<br />

Isomerisation<br />

i. Naptha Catalystic Reform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Petrochemical option<br />

ii. Distillate Desulphurisation<br />

Vacuum Distillation<br />

Vacuum gasoil desulfurisation<br />

iii. Vacuum Gas oil<br />

FCCU Hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Lube oil base stocks<br />

Visbreak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Solvent Deasphatt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Delayed cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Flexi cock<strong>in</strong>g<br />

iv. Residue Resid catalysitic crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Hydro-treat<strong>in</strong>g (Atm &Vacuum)<br />

Vacuum resid Hydro-crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Gassification<br />

Power generation<br />

Alkalisation<br />

Poly Naptha<br />

v. Light Oilf<strong>in</strong> Ethrification<br />

Petrochemicals<br />

Deep catalysitic Crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

11. Hydrogen addition<br />

• Hydro treat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Hydro ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Hydro crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Ill. Physical separation<br />

• Solvent Deasphalt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Table 3.25 shows possible ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g upgradation options. No s<strong>in</strong>gle optional<br />

configuration exists which can be directly adopted for all ref<strong>in</strong>ery configurations.<br />

The configuration is to be decided on the basis of market demand of products and<br />

supply of crude oil. For example <strong>in</strong> US, FCC units and cocker is considered as<br />

better option because of heavier crude slates and high gasol<strong>in</strong>e and high residual<br />

fuel oil demand. In Europe, because of the availability of the fuel oil outlets,<br />

thermal crack<strong>in</strong>g is substituted for cok<strong>in</strong>g. In Japan, hydro-desulfurisation<br />

92


capacity for long residue is substantial because of low sulphur fuel oil market.<br />

Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g selection of residue up gradation technology are <strong>in</strong>vestment,<br />

product pattern, return on <strong>in</strong>vestment etc. These are the methods for maximum<br />

upgradation but it may not be economic to go for full upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of residue. The<br />

optimumprocesses configurations are given <strong>in</strong> Table 3.25<br />

3.6.4 Classification of Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> Context<br />

From March 31, 2002 all petroleum products except LPG and Kerosene<br />

has been totally deregulated with the freedom to import ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. In<br />

these years India is go<strong>in</strong>g to face huge deficit of petroleum products particularly<br />

middle distillates. To meet the large gap between supply and demand,<br />

Government of India has taken measures to expand the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>in</strong> the<br />

country. The capacity is expected to <strong>in</strong>crease from present 112MMTPA to<br />

150MMTPA by 2010,which is a great challenge to the <strong>in</strong>dustry. Exist<strong>in</strong>g as well as<br />

new entrants, will have to expand and / or build ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Industry is also to face<br />

change of adopt<strong>in</strong>g newer technologies to meet <strong>in</strong>creased requirement of middle<br />

distillates and environmental regulations for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery operations as well as<br />

product quality. In this regard, follow<strong>in</strong>g aspects are important.<br />

• Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery need to provide flexibility to process variety of crude oil<br />

Le. both light as well as heavy with high sulfur content.<br />

• Development of resid process<strong>in</strong>g technologies viz. FCCU, hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

etc. to upgrade heavier ends.<br />

• Adoption of technologies like hydro-treatment, hydro-desulphurisation,<br />

summarization etc. to meet str<strong>in</strong>gent product quality likely to be<br />

enforced <strong>in</strong> future. As can be seen from above, all new process<br />

technologies require substantial qualities of hydrogen for which<br />

dedicated hydrogen produc<strong>in</strong>g facilities will have to be <strong>in</strong>stalled.<br />

In India the follow<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ery marg<strong>in</strong>s are there.<br />

• Highon stream factors of process units<br />

• Low manpower costs<br />

• Low cost of land<br />

• Less str<strong>in</strong>gent environmental regulation<br />

• Less transportation cost due to long coastal belt<br />

93


Exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries do have capacity to get useful streams from distillation<br />

columns. So the reprocess<strong>in</strong>g requirement is m<strong>in</strong>imum to sell the production <strong>in</strong><br />

the domestic market. <strong>Indian</strong> manpower cost is cheaper when compared to many<br />

countries <strong>in</strong> Asia Pacific. Low cost of land makes the expansions cheaper and<br />

economical. Environmental regulations are liberal when compared to western<br />

countries. So many f<strong>in</strong>al expensive processes are elim<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />

This reduces the cost of production as well as capital <strong>in</strong>vestment. Flexibility for<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g light as well as heavy crude with high sulfur content will be required<br />

to improve profitability. The environmental regulations will change <strong>in</strong> the near<br />

future. For example Delhi made a lot of changes <strong>in</strong> the regulations, which can be<br />

expected <strong>in</strong> other parts of the country also. To meet these challenges these<br />

optimum processes configuration <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> context are as given <strong>in</strong> the Table 3.26.<br />

Technology up gradation has been a thrust area all along and technology<br />

upgradation plans are be<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uously pursued <strong>in</strong> order to recover bottom of<br />

the barrel to the maximum extent. Technology upgradation has also been<br />

adopted <strong>in</strong> modernization and advance control energy conservation, product<br />

quality improvement, etc. apart from augmentation of crude process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capacities. Scann<strong>in</strong>g and implement<strong>in</strong>g technological advances is also evident <strong>in</strong><br />

theplansof years to come.<br />

Table 3.26 Optimum processes configuration <strong>in</strong> India.<br />

Processes Advantages<br />

Low Investment<br />

Low return<br />

FCCU +Solvent Deasphalt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Maximum Gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Pitch disposal<br />

High <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

Low return<br />

Resid Hydrotreat<strong>in</strong>g + Resid Catalystic crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Least unwanted products<br />

Maximum Gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Medium <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

FCCU +Delayed cocker (without VGO<br />

High return<br />

hydrotreatment)<br />

Maximum gasol<strong>in</strong>e, Coke disposal<br />

Medium <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

Moderate returns<br />

Hydrocracker +Solvent deasphalt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Maximum middle distillation<br />

Pitch disposal.<br />

94


3.6.5 Options for Types of Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> Future<br />

Future ref<strong>in</strong>ery criteria is a critical subject which has many diversified<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dividual countries depend<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly on the socio-economic<br />

conditions, political environment, and close observations on environmental<br />

management issues. The countries which depend on imported crude, the crude<br />

quality of their requirement has limited choice because the exporter country<br />

naturally will try to deliver much sour and residuous crude, to the comparatively<br />

less predom<strong>in</strong>ant countries and will def<strong>in</strong>itely use sweet crude for themselves or<br />

supplyto the effluent countries.<br />

In the above context, the day is not far when India has to consider the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g options, though it may appear at the moment a more costly<br />

affair to revamp or reeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries, but when crude will<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>e or deteriorate further the options will be more realistic. Options available<br />

are:<br />

• Sour crude ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Super Oil crack<strong>in</strong>g(SOC)<br />

• Deep catalystic crack<strong>in</strong>g (DCC)<br />

• Hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g for produc<strong>in</strong>g high quality middle distillate<br />

• Distillate dewax<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• ISO dewax<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Modernisation of asphalt technology<br />

• Vacuum gas oil Hydrotreat<strong>in</strong>g and mild hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Flexicock<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Improvement <strong>in</strong> the catalyst design and concepts for vibreak<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

FCC to accommodate more residue and contam<strong>in</strong>ated feed and<br />

beheld position<strong>in</strong>g the catalyst for a reasonable period.<br />

• Reform<strong>in</strong>g units<br />

• Diesel fuel upgrad<strong>in</strong>g: Hydroprocess<strong>in</strong>g for deep desulfurisation<br />

and / or aromatics saturation<br />

• Gasification of petroleum coke<br />

• Integration of hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g with residue upgradation, light cycle<br />

Oil (LCO) upgradation to premium products<br />

• Moderate pressure hydrocrack<strong>in</strong>g as a conversion alternative<br />

95


In this scenario the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries also have started to diversify<br />

their ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g options <strong>in</strong>to the areas like petrochemicals manufacture power plant<br />

set up basically to use the furnace oil because the demand for future furnace oil<br />

through out the world is on the decrease, keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

quantity and quality of middle distillates for meet<strong>in</strong>g the demand of transport<br />

fuels.<br />

Demand for high sulfur residual fuels is <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e relative to the demand<br />

for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. This is largely due to environmental considerations, which<br />

are push<strong>in</strong>g the ref<strong>in</strong>ery's product barrel <strong>in</strong>to lighter, low sulfur fuels. Gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

demand growth <strong>in</strong> Europe and the United States is sluggish while the market for<br />

high quality distillates rema<strong>in</strong> tight. As a result of these changes <strong>in</strong> the market<br />

place, ref<strong>in</strong>eries are seek<strong>in</strong>g routes to a profiTable future. The <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />

residue upgradation technology with gas oil conservation capability has the dual<br />

effect of follow<strong>in</strong>g optimization of process parameters to satisfy products demand<br />

and of provid<strong>in</strong>g flexibility to meet new specification for higher quality<br />

transportation fuels.<br />

3.7 Conclusion<br />

A thorough understand<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil drill<strong>in</strong>g to the consumption of<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ed products is essential to f<strong>in</strong>d out the problems <strong>in</strong> SCM of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Detailed study of production, supply, pric<strong>in</strong>g, consumption of crude oil, and<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ed products etc. was presented as an <strong>in</strong>troduction to this chapter. On the<br />

basis of that <strong>in</strong>formation, the location of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery was studied because location<br />

has great impact on supply cha<strong>in</strong> of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Factor comparison method was<br />

modified to cater to the needs of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery and a n<strong>in</strong>e-factor method was<br />

developed for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out the right location. This model will help <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

location for a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Weighted scores for each location will be available<br />

from the model. Selection of technology is the important activity after selection of<br />

location. When competition <strong>in</strong>creases, flexibility is a key determ<strong>in</strong>ant factor <strong>in</strong><br />

decid<strong>in</strong>g variety of products and reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory. Inventory reduction can<br />

improve <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>creased profitability. Thirteen areas of flexibility were identified<br />

for the performance improvement <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. It was not tried to quantify the<br />

96


flexibility. This will help <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the performance of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. To<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imize the movement of products, appropriate technology must be selected.<br />

Comparison and suitability of each type of technology was also discussed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>Indian</strong> context.<br />

Demand for standard petroleum products is not <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the world<br />

market even though there is growth <strong>in</strong> the domestic market. After decontroll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and liberalization the <strong>Indian</strong> oil market also will face competition from imported<br />

products and <strong>in</strong>ternational players. Exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries must be equipped to<br />

compete with high quality imported products and value added products from new<br />

generation <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries also. Flexibility <strong>in</strong> all levels, start<strong>in</strong>g from selection<br />

of crude oil to the blend<strong>in</strong>g at the latest possible po<strong>in</strong>t is considered for<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Export<strong>in</strong>g products will be another<br />

option available to the ref<strong>in</strong>eries for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g profitability. Flexibility <strong>in</strong><br />

production must be designed to export products because each market<br />

specification will be different. In a nutshell, flexibility must be maximum for<br />

maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the profit of <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Technology selection must be<br />

supplement<strong>in</strong>g the flexibility. Technology available and suitable for India is<br />

identified. The tools used for location identification was found appropriate and<br />

the results are very encourag<strong>in</strong>g. Methodology for flexibility and technology<br />

selection are found to be very useful. Next chapter discusses the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

97


Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Production plann<strong>in</strong>g and schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Product storage plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Post data based model<br />

Causal model<br />

Production Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Production Schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 4.1. Production system (simplified)<br />

Creat<strong>in</strong>ga successful supply cha<strong>in</strong> strategy needs a lot of parameters such as good<br />

transportation facility for crude oil and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products, sufficient facility at port for<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g all types of ships, good <strong>in</strong>formation technology for data transfer. Once a good<br />

strategy is formulated, actually execut<strong>in</strong>g the strategy is also complex. Many highly<br />

talented and dedicated employees at all levels of the organization are necessary to make a<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> strategy successful. Execution of a strategy can be very important as the<br />

strategy itself. Major obstacles to achieve strategic fit are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly demand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

customers, and fragmentation of supply cha<strong>in</strong> ownership. Overcom<strong>in</strong>g these obstacles<br />

offers tremendous opportunity for firms to use supply cha<strong>in</strong> management to ga<strong>in</strong><br />

competitive advantages.<br />

As discussed <strong>in</strong> chapter 3 there has been <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> world trade of crude oil and<br />

petroleum products. Products that are largely traded are LPG, Naphtha, Kerosene,<br />

Diesel, and Petrol. World over ref<strong>in</strong>eries are work<strong>in</strong>g on cost reduction due to<br />

competition. In many countries <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity for ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is more than the demand<br />

<strong>in</strong>those countries. Those companies are prepared for export of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. Due to<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g up of economy, India is also exposed to <strong>in</strong>ternational competition. Cost<br />

reduction is essential for the <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries also to withstand the competition from<br />

101


other mult<strong>in</strong>ational players. All the elements <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> must be analyzed for<br />

maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the effectiveness of the system. In this chapter the problems of full supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are analysed.<br />

4.2 Problems <strong>in</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Major petroleum companies have many ref<strong>in</strong>eries at different locations <strong>in</strong> the<br />

country. <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation is an example. S<strong>in</strong>gle ref<strong>in</strong>ery companies are also there<br />

<strong>in</strong> India. Multiple ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g companies have their own advantages and some<br />

disadvantages. Ma<strong>in</strong> advantages are given below.<br />

a. Shar<strong>in</strong>g of key experts and expertise. Expertise <strong>in</strong> purchase of crude oil and<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g can be utilized for all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the group. Experience <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

operation and ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g can be transferred to newer ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />

b. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t decision will help <strong>in</strong> policy decisions. Corporate office will have<br />

competent team for formulat<strong>in</strong>g major policy decision for each ref<strong>in</strong>ery at different<br />

locations. The entire ref<strong>in</strong>ery will have uniform style of operation, so the performance of<br />

all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries can be better due to centralized decision mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

c. Bulk Purchase is possible for multiple ref<strong>in</strong>eries because the purchase is<br />

controlled centrally from the corporate office. The bulk purchase will have price<br />

advantage. Term purchase can be made for major quantity and spot purchase can be<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imized. This will give better sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> purchase.<br />

d. Shar<strong>in</strong>g of crude is a ga<strong>in</strong> for multi site ref<strong>in</strong>ery because bulk conta<strong>in</strong>ers can<br />

be used for transport<strong>in</strong>g crude oil from far off places like Egypt. So the price ga<strong>in</strong> can be<br />

tapped bythese groups.<br />

e. Shar<strong>in</strong>g of products and streams is possible for these ref<strong>in</strong>eries, if there is<br />

a demand for a product <strong>in</strong> the market of another ref<strong>in</strong>ery, then that product can be<br />

supplied from another ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Similarly if a product is held up <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery that can be<br />

moved tosomeother place where there is demand.<br />

f. Specialized products can be manufactured <strong>in</strong> one unit and can be supplied to<br />

all the market. Specialized products normally require high capital <strong>in</strong>vestment, which will<br />

not be feasible with all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries. One ref<strong>in</strong>ery of a group of ref<strong>in</strong>eries can very well<br />

manage it.<br />

102


g. Distribution grid can be developed by multi site ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Market<strong>in</strong>g is easy<br />

for these ref<strong>in</strong>eries because of the availability of products and capital required for the<br />

grid development.<br />

h. Market Control is easier because of the grid. More number of outlets can be<br />

developed so that the entry of new market<strong>in</strong>g companies can be prevented to a greater<br />

extend.<br />

Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery needs to concentrate <strong>in</strong> production only because all other elements<br />

of supply cha<strong>in</strong> will be taken care by separate departments <strong>in</strong> corporate office. For<br />

example, purchase will be done by the purchase department of the corporate office. So<br />

each ref<strong>in</strong>ery can develop strength <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and be normally very good <strong>in</strong> capacity<br />

utilization. S<strong>in</strong>gle site ref<strong>in</strong>ery has some advantages over the multi site ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />

Decision on all maters can be taken faster because all the offices are <strong>in</strong> the same site.<br />

Implementation of decisions will also be faster. So the response of the system will be<br />

faster than multi-site ref<strong>in</strong>eries. In our research we have selected a s<strong>in</strong>gle site ref<strong>in</strong>ery for<br />

the study of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management because all the data are available from a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

source. First hand <strong>in</strong>formation is available on all operations from the same ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Operations and plann<strong>in</strong>g are similar <strong>in</strong> multi-site and s<strong>in</strong>gle site ref<strong>in</strong>eries. In multi-site<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries different <strong>in</strong>formation are available at different geographical locations. The<br />

selected ref<strong>in</strong>ery is hav<strong>in</strong>g very good operat<strong>in</strong>g efficiency. It is consistently above 100%<br />

for the years 1998 to 2002. It is process<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>Indian</strong> and imported crude oil. So<br />

procedure for the purchase of imported and <strong>Indian</strong> crude is also available. All the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation required for a detailed analysis of function<strong>in</strong>g of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is available with<br />

the ref<strong>in</strong>ery selected for study. So the data collected represents the true picture of a<br />

typical ref<strong>in</strong>ery<strong>in</strong> India.<br />

4.2.1 Logistic Problems<br />

Complexity of logistic problem <strong>in</strong>creases with variables such as limitation of<br />

distillation column, limitation of port facility for handl<strong>in</strong>g ships, etc. Logistics problem<br />

can bebroadly divided <strong>in</strong>to two stages namely design stage, and plann<strong>in</strong>g and operation<br />

stage. Operat<strong>in</strong>g problems are of less severe nature <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries with lot of automation<br />

and control systems. Hence they are not discussed here <strong>in</strong> detail. Majority of the design<br />

stage problem cannot be rectified after <strong>in</strong>stallation. So the optimal solutions can be<br />

achieved ma<strong>in</strong>ly for new ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>eries can look for alternative solutions<br />

for the problem. For example jetty facility cannot be improved beyond a certa<strong>in</strong> limit for<br />

an exist<strong>in</strong>g port. But at the time of site selection port facility can be given due<br />

103


importance. Solutions for design stage problems are capital <strong>in</strong>tensive and time<br />

consum<strong>in</strong>g. Improvement <strong>in</strong> design will not be normally as efficient as a new design. So<br />

<strong>in</strong> this discussion the important design stage problems are dealt with. This will be useful<br />

for newref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />

'a<br />

Tb141M' a e . atrllofl" OlllStlCS problems Design Stage<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g Stage<br />

Annual Plan Roll<strong>in</strong>g Plan Daily Plan<br />

-Jetty Characteristics - Quantity OfCrude - Ratio ofcrude types - Plan for ship receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

c<br />

:::I -Moor<strong>in</strong>g Types - Comparison OfRude - Ship selection<br />

- Plann<strong>in</strong>g tanks<br />

0<br />

J:l -Pipel<strong>in</strong>e Selection<br />

.E<br />

- Rates Of <strong>Indian</strong> And - Shar<strong>in</strong>g with other - Plann<strong>in</strong>g pipel<strong>in</strong>e for crude<br />

-Crude Storage Tanks Imported Crude ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

- M<strong>in</strong>imize demurrage<br />

..<br />

-Selection OfProcess -OEB - Ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g - Process<strong>in</strong>g ofcrude<br />

"ii<br />

- Variety OfProducts -Products Demand - Availability oftanks -Variety ofproducts<br />

c<br />

!<br />

-Site Selection Products - Availability OfCrude - Products offtake - Blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

.E<br />

-Storage Capacity • Connectivity OfTanks - Product demand -Tank schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

..<br />

'a<br />

c<br />

:::I<br />

0<br />

J:l<br />

:::I<br />

0<br />

- Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance - Product mix -Information generation<br />

- Transportation modes - Ratio ofeach mode - Ratio ofproducts - Load<strong>in</strong>g each mode<br />

- Load<strong>in</strong>g systems - Demand ofproducts - Mode oftransport - Information generation<br />

- Parcel sizes - Area wise demand - Arrang<strong>in</strong>g transport - Capacity utilization<br />

The complex problem can be divided <strong>in</strong> to subgroups for easy and efficient<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g. It is standard practice <strong>in</strong> logistics related studies to classify and study problems<br />

as <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound logistics problems, Lamm<strong>in</strong>g, et.al [2002]. We have<br />

also adopted this method.<br />

4.2.2Inbound Logistics Problems<br />

Major classification is made as design stage, plann<strong>in</strong>g stage, and operational<br />

stage. In the case of ref<strong>in</strong>ery some major plann<strong>in</strong>g decisions must be taken <strong>in</strong> the design<br />

stage itself. Plans must be made <strong>in</strong> the solution space constra<strong>in</strong>ed by design. Major<br />

decisions of design stage <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound logistics are jetty characteristics, moor<strong>in</strong>g types,<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e selection and crude storage tanks. Jetty characteristics <strong>in</strong>volve draft <strong>in</strong> the jetty,<br />

discharg<strong>in</strong>g facility for crude oil, pilotage facility for day and night and turn<strong>in</strong>g radius for<br />

ships. Moor<strong>in</strong>g is a bottleneck for many oil ports. Ships with high ullage cannot be<br />

brought to many of the ports <strong>in</strong> the country. The alternative for this is go<strong>in</strong>g for s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t moor<strong>in</strong>g (SPM). Inbound logistics deals with identification of supplier, purchas<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

transport<strong>in</strong>g, receiv<strong>in</strong>g, and storage of raw material and services. In the case of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

<strong>in</strong>bound logistics ma<strong>in</strong>ly deals with identification of crude oil, purchas<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil,<br />

104


Daily Plan <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound logistics will make the arrival and storage of crude oil.<br />

Smooth ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g is the most important activity <strong>in</strong> this. By proper ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

demurrages can be m<strong>in</strong>imized and storage tanks can be properly utilized. S<strong>in</strong>ce pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

is a bottleneck for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, schedul<strong>in</strong>g will help <strong>in</strong> better utilization of pipel<strong>in</strong>e also. A<br />

simulation model for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g is developed.<br />

4.2.3 Internal Logistic Problems<br />

Internal logistics generally deals with the issues of transport<strong>in</strong>g, value additions,<br />

and storage of f<strong>in</strong>ished products. In the case of ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics deals with the<br />

delivery of crude oil from tanks <strong>in</strong> the tank farm, transport<strong>in</strong>g through pipel<strong>in</strong>e to the<br />

distillation columns, distillation, transferr<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed streams to different tanks, blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tomakef<strong>in</strong>al products, and storage <strong>in</strong> tanks for market<strong>in</strong>g. Selection of process, variety<br />

products, site selection, and products storage capacity are the important facilities to be<br />

considered <strong>in</strong> the design stage of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery; technology for many process are available.<br />

Selection of technology is very important because availability of crude oil and products<br />

demand has high impact on the process<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil. Site of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery is important<br />

asfar logistics is concerned. Details are given <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3. Options for selection of site<br />

and factors to be considered are all discussed <strong>in</strong> detail. The areas where annual plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

isrequired are given below:<br />

• Demand for products<br />

• Availability of crude<br />

• Oil economic budget<br />

• Connectivity of storage tanks-us<strong>in</strong>g design flexibility<br />

Oil economic budget (OEB) is the budget estimate of crude for a year. Demand for<br />

products is estimated for the year. On the basis of the estimated demand the OEB is<br />

prepared.<br />

Roll<strong>in</strong>g short plan deals with the follow<strong>in</strong>g areas.<br />

• Ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Availability of tanks<br />

• Products demand<br />

• Products off stake<br />

• Product mix<br />

Ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g can be done for a month and it needs monitor<strong>in</strong>g also. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is essential to avoid starv<strong>in</strong>g and block<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery operation. If the supply is not<br />

enough, then there will be starv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g process. If the supply is more, it will<br />

block the delivery due to unavailability of tanks <strong>in</strong> the tank farm. In ref<strong>in</strong>ery the stages<br />

106


are tightly coupled with limited <strong>in</strong>ter-stages. So it is difficult to manage if starvation or<br />

blockages take place. This can be overcome with proper short term plann<strong>in</strong>g. Solution for<br />

shipschedul<strong>in</strong>g problem is given <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Tank availability for storage of crude oil<br />

and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products must be planned <strong>in</strong> advance because all tanks cannot be used<br />

<strong>in</strong>terchangeably. Connection between tanks is important <strong>in</strong> utiliz<strong>in</strong>g tanks to the full<br />

capacity. All tanks are not <strong>in</strong>terconnected. This <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terconnection needs<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g and time for do<strong>in</strong>g the connection. Tanks used for certa<strong>in</strong> products cannot be<br />

used for some other products, for example tanks used for furnace oil cannot be used for<br />

stor<strong>in</strong>g motor spirit. Products off take also must be planned <strong>in</strong> advance. It is normally<br />

based on the prediction of the demand. Solution for the problem of error <strong>in</strong> products<br />

demand is discussed <strong>in</strong> this Chapter. Products demand <strong>in</strong> the market can be monitored<br />

exactly and which will lead to better plann<strong>in</strong>g of products movement. Product mix also<br />

can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a better way by the newly suggested <strong>in</strong>formation system (chapter 5).<br />

This will reduce the level of<strong>in</strong>ventory.<br />

Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves the type of crude and quantity of crude to be processed <strong>in</strong><br />

each distillation column. Operational plann<strong>in</strong>g is necessary because there can be<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory and flow rate of crude oil. Buffer <strong>in</strong>ventory can vary from three<br />

months roll<strong>in</strong>g plan. So adjustments <strong>in</strong> flow rate become necessary. This may lead to<br />

adjustments <strong>in</strong> daily plann<strong>in</strong>g of capacity and <strong>in</strong>terconnection of tanks. Availability of<br />

products is dependent on these decisions. Variety of products also will be a function of<br />

daily plann<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil process<strong>in</strong>g. Blend<strong>in</strong>g is done for achiev<strong>in</strong>g the correct<br />

specification of products. It is based on the demand from the market. The blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

decision is also taken daily. Problems and solutions of blend<strong>in</strong>g are given <strong>in</strong> chapter 6.<br />

Tank schedul<strong>in</strong>g is also done on daily basis. This problem cannot be generalized because<br />

the connectivity among tanks is unique <strong>in</strong> each ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Information generation also<br />

must be monitored on daily basis. Inbound logistics generates a lot of data. Detailed data<br />

collection model is also discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5.<br />

4.2.4 Outbound Logistics Problems<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>eries use pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship, railway wagons, and truck for movement of ref<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

products. The quantity varies with respect to the location of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery and target<br />

market. Mode of transport must be decided at the time of design itself to build up<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure facility as per the demand and supply. Selection of mode can be made on<br />

the basis of <strong>in</strong>formation available <strong>in</strong> Table 4.2. Load<strong>in</strong>g system of each mode is different<br />

and thedeign of the system depends on the quantity to be handled. For example if more<br />

107


mode and each product is taken on daily basis. Correct plann<strong>in</strong>g cannot be done <strong>in</strong><br />

advance because small quantities demand will not be <strong>in</strong>timated <strong>in</strong> advance. They will be<br />

directly com<strong>in</strong>g to the load<strong>in</strong>g place with required document. So <strong>in</strong>formation generation<br />

is important on each day for the plann<strong>in</strong>g of next day. Data generated must be converted<br />

to <strong>in</strong>formation. Schedul<strong>in</strong>g for each day can be done on the capacity of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. So<br />

delivery plans must be made on the basis of <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g strategy is<br />

given <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.2.<br />

Crude available<br />

Process capacity available<br />

Inventory on hand<br />

Required clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

Demandforecast<br />

Storage space available<br />

Daily planfor production Quantity ofproducts<br />

Figure 4.2 Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g strategy<br />

Analysis of logistics problem <strong>in</strong>dicates the importance of overall plann<strong>in</strong>g cannot<br />

be done <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle stage. Bechtel [1993] reveals the importance of hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for better and easier performance of an organization. So a hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g model<br />

has beendeveloped for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />

4.3 Hierarchical Model for Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Like any other <strong>in</strong>dustry, petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>eries also need to have plann<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

different time periods. In ref<strong>in</strong>eries it is found to be effective with annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, three<br />

months roll<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g, one months firm plann<strong>in</strong>g, and daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. Splitt<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g to different time zones make it more effective and efficient. The <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

available at annual plann<strong>in</strong>g stage is more aggregate and <strong>in</strong>accurate. With the availability<br />

of better quality forecasts at three months level the same can be used to make more<br />

accurate plans. The variations are lesser at monthly and daily levels mak<strong>in</strong>g it possible<br />

109


Tentative demand for products will be available from the monthly plann<strong>in</strong>g. This<br />

can be used for daily plann<strong>in</strong>g for production. Along with that, the stock available with<br />

the ref<strong>in</strong>ery also must be considered for the daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. Crude oil available for<br />

ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g can be planned accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>formation from monthly plan. Both quantity<br />

and quality of each type of crude oil is planned <strong>in</strong> the monthly plan. Arrival of ships is<br />

available from the ship schedule programmed and it is dependent on the ullages at<br />

dest<strong>in</strong>ation. Plann<strong>in</strong>g for receiv<strong>in</strong>g ships can be made on daily basis. Information on ship<br />

arrival must be passed to the port for <strong>in</strong>frastructure facility provid<strong>in</strong>g. Storage of<br />

products <strong>in</strong> tank is decided on daily basis only because it depends on the product uplift.<br />

Product movement and production cannot be planned <strong>in</strong> advance. For better and correct<br />

performance, daily plann<strong>in</strong>g will be better. Same is true for the crude oil storage also.<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g is also planned accord<strong>in</strong>g to the customer specification streams available and<br />

product demand. Normal practice for blend<strong>in</strong>g is mak<strong>in</strong>g correct specification <strong>in</strong> .each<br />

tank. Soblend<strong>in</strong>g can be planned only on daily basis.<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g sequence discussed <strong>in</strong> this section provides better and smooth flow of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation from annual plann<strong>in</strong>g to daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. This makes the ref<strong>in</strong>ery operations<br />

smooth and the efficiency of the system will improve. It will also help <strong>in</strong> remov<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> operation and plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

4.3.5 Plann<strong>in</strong>g Comparison<br />

Hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g shows the stages of plann<strong>in</strong>g. It will be useful for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

to compare the present practices and the system demand <strong>in</strong> SCM. Plann<strong>in</strong>g zones are<br />

subdivided <strong>in</strong>to three for convenience of analysis namely annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, roll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g, and daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. In this comparison three months plan and monthly plan<br />

are merged together because the same tools are used for both plans and they overlap very<br />

much <strong>in</strong> majority of areas. Table 4. 3 shows the present practices <strong>in</strong> annual plann<strong>in</strong>g zone<br />

and proposes tools for performance improvement<br />

Table 4.4 shows roll<strong>in</strong>g plan which covers both three months and monthly<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g and Table 4.5 shows daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. Different tools are given <strong>in</strong> the Tables. Each<br />

tool can be modified to send and ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Data for the tools is taken from a standalone<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Performance of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery was analyzed <strong>in</strong> detail and is given <strong>in</strong> Chapter 6.<br />

114


Table 4.3 Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Function Data Used Decision to betaken<br />

Crude type<br />

Quantity, Quality and cost of<br />

crude, Assays, capacity<br />

Selection constra<strong>in</strong>ts and netback<br />

Model<br />

Present Proposed<br />

Grades ofcrude tobe Data based<br />

purchased each us<strong>in</strong>g 'what LP<br />

month if<br />

."<br />

c:<br />

:::I<br />

0<br />

.a<br />

.5<br />

Crude<br />

Purchase<br />

Ship size<br />

Selection<br />

Quantity, Quality and cost of<br />

crude, logistics cost, Assays,<br />

capacity constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

netback<br />

Size ofships, Per day costs,<br />

travel, load and joumey times,<br />

demurrage rates<br />

Crude to be<br />

purchased each<br />

month from each<br />

supplier<br />

Select<strong>in</strong>g optimum<br />

size ship from each<br />

load port<br />

Data based<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g 'what<br />

if<br />

Thumb rule<br />

LP<br />

Spread<br />

sheet<br />

Port facility<br />

Size ofships, parcel size,<br />

draft, number ofberths,<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g facilities, discharge<br />

rates, port charges<br />

Selection ofthe Port<br />

facilities togo for<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g expansion<br />

'What if<br />

expert<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

based<br />

Spread<br />

sheet and<br />

simulation<br />

ii<br />

E<br />

• -.5<br />

Process<br />

automation<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

Product Quality demand,<br />

Automation costs, Flexibility<br />

and control requirements,<br />

manpower costs<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance history,<br />

condition data, Production<br />

schedules<br />

Degree ofautomation<br />

to use <strong>in</strong> process<br />

control <strong>in</strong> the Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

When todo planned<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance for what<br />

Automated<br />

Experience<br />

based<br />

No change<br />

Spread<br />

sheet<br />

Oil Economy<br />

Budget<br />

Product demand, Crudes<br />

available, capacity, netbacks<br />

How much ofwhich<br />

crude toprocess when<br />

<strong>in</strong> each ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

All India<br />

data<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

data focus<br />

."<br />

c:<br />

:::I<br />

0<br />

.a-:::I<br />

0<br />

Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

design for<br />

transport<br />

Transport<br />

mode<br />

Demand for products at<br />

different location, Cost per ton<br />

ofmode, Flexibility required<br />

Rate oftransport, Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

capacity, customer preference<br />

Capacity and<br />

expandability ofeach<br />

type ofterm<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Mode oftransport<br />

All India<br />

demand<br />

Thumb rule<br />

Demand<br />

forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

model<br />

Spread<br />

sheet<br />

Roll<strong>in</strong>g plan time zone also is divided <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>bound logistics, <strong>in</strong>temallogistics, and<br />

outbound logistics. Analysis is done on the basis of function, data presently used, and<br />

decision to be used. Tools used for each type of decision mak<strong>in</strong>g at each level are<br />

analyzed and proposals for new set of tools are suggested wherever required. General<br />

practice of ref<strong>in</strong>eries is thump rule based decision mak<strong>in</strong>g except <strong>in</strong> critical areas like<br />

crude selection, blend<strong>in</strong>g, etc.<br />

115


Table 4.4 Roll<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Function Data Used<br />

Quantity, Quality and<br />

Quotations ofcrudes, Crude to be<br />

Model<br />

Decision to be<br />

taken Present Proposed<br />

Crude logistics cost, Assays, purchased each Data based<br />

Purchase capacity constra<strong>in</strong>ts and month from each us<strong>in</strong>g 'what if<br />

'1:1<br />

c<br />

:J<br />

netbacks supplier<br />

.8<br />

.E<br />

Ship<br />

selection and<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Quality ofcrude from each<br />

supplier, ships available<br />

and alternate possible<br />

schedules<br />

Decid<strong>in</strong>g which<br />

ships to hire from<br />

which ports and<br />

when<br />

Thumb Rule<br />

and<br />

experience<br />

Ship schedule<br />

evaluation<br />

Simulation<br />

based DSS<br />

Ship schedules, production When to take<br />

Tank schedules, tank yard which tanks for Gantt based<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance capacities, major de-sludg<strong>in</strong>g and Thump rule evaluation of<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>tenance plans, time m<strong>in</strong>or alternative<br />

ii<br />

E<br />

GI<br />

-.E<br />

Plant<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for ma<strong>in</strong>tenance oftank<br />

Production and dispatch<br />

schedules, Product tank<br />

yard capacities and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory, major<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance plans, time<br />

for ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of<br />

equipment<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

When to take<br />

which equipment<br />

for and m<strong>in</strong>or<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

Departmental<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

experience<br />

Gantt based<br />

evaluation of<br />

alternative<br />

Transport Distance to move, Qty Apportion<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

mode moved, frequency of rakes, ships and Thump rule Spread sheet<br />

'1:1<br />

c<br />

:J<br />

0<br />

.a -:J 0<br />

selection<br />

Transport<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

movement, cost, ullage<br />

Product demand, mode<br />

selection results, costs,<br />

capacities oftransport<br />

lorry<br />

How much of<br />

transport facility<br />

needed and when<br />

and where?<br />

Gross level<br />

aggregate/ap<br />

proximate<br />

Spread sheet<br />

based with<br />

'what iffacility'<br />

Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g also requires keen attention for improv<strong>in</strong>g the performance of<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Majority of decisions can be taken with the help of<br />

spreadsheet. Decision like ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g requires sophisticated tools like simulation.<br />

Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery is not normally considered as very important because it goes <strong>in</strong><br />

flow because it is a process <strong>in</strong>dustry. Proper daily plann<strong>in</strong>g can reduce both semi f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

and f<strong>in</strong>ished goods <strong>in</strong>ventory.<br />

116<br />

LP


Table 4.5 Daily plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Function Data Used Decision to betaken<br />

Ships wait<strong>in</strong>g, crude type,<br />

Ship Receiv<strong>in</strong>g demurrage rates, Stage at<br />

"C Berth<strong>in</strong>Q facility<br />

c ::;,<br />

Decide order <strong>in</strong>which<br />

ships will be received<br />

Model<br />

Present Proposed<br />

Spread sheet Simulation<br />

0<br />

.a<br />

.5<br />

Tank allocation<br />

Tank capacity, condition,<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e connectivity, crude<br />

storage capacity required,<br />

production plan<br />

Allocat<strong>in</strong>g tanks tocrude Thumb rule<br />

Modified thumb<br />

rule<br />

Process<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

crude<br />

Product demand, assay and<br />

plant technical<br />

characteristics<br />

Which crude toprocess<br />

<strong>in</strong>which facility and<br />

when<br />

Spread sheet<br />

Spread sheet<br />

(not modified)<br />

ii<br />

... c<br />

Cl)<br />

.5 -<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

How much ofWhat product<br />

ofwhat specs required, how<br />

much ofwhat are the<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>a streams available<br />

How much ofwhich<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g streams to<br />

blend towhich products<br />

Experience and<br />

based on batch<br />

lab chemical<br />

tests<br />

LP<br />

Storage tank<br />

selection for<br />

products<br />

Tank capacity, condition,<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e connectivity,<br />

product storage required,<br />

dispatch plan<br />

Allocat<strong>in</strong>g tanks to<br />

different products<br />

Thumb rule<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

centralized tank<br />

vard data<br />

Modified thumb<br />

rule<br />

"C<br />

c<br />

::;,<br />

0<br />

.a- ::;,<br />

0<br />

Dispatch<br />

transaction<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Dispatch of<br />

goods<br />

Wait<strong>in</strong>g orders, urgency<br />

requests, status ofload<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stations, transport<br />

availability<br />

Pend<strong>in</strong>g orders, wait<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transport for dispatch,<br />

clearance for disoatch<br />

To select order totake<br />

and process from wait<strong>in</strong>g<br />

customers<br />

To select order tofill<br />

from wait<strong>in</strong>g orders<br />

Rule based<br />

Rule based<br />

Rule based-<br />

modified<br />

Rule based-<br />

modified<br />

4.4. Plann<strong>in</strong>g Demand<br />

All supply cha<strong>in</strong> decisions are based on an estimate of future demand. The forecast<br />

offuture demand forms the basis for all strategic and plann<strong>in</strong>g decisions <strong>in</strong> a supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>. Consider the push/pull view of the supply cha<strong>in</strong> discussed <strong>in</strong> section 4.4.5. All push<br />

processes are performed <strong>in</strong> anticipation of customer demand, and all pull process is<br />

performed <strong>in</strong> response to customer demand. For push processes, a company must plan<br />

the level of production. For pull process, a company must plan the level of capacity to<br />

make available.<br />

4.4.1 Characteristicsof Forecast<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g characteristics must be known to forecast<strong>in</strong>g department. Long<br />

term forecasts are usually less accurate than short term forecasts, Le. long term forecasts<br />

have alargest standard deviations of error relative to the mean than short term forecasts.<br />

Aggregate forecasts are usually more accurate than desegregate forecasts. Aggregate<br />

forecasts tend to have a smaller standard deviation of error relative to the mean. For<br />

example - it is easy to forecast the gross domestic product (GDP) of India for a given year<br />

with less than a 2 percent error. It is much more difficult to forecast yearly earn<strong>in</strong>gs for a<br />

117


company with less than 2 percent error, and it is even harder to forecast demand for a<br />

given product with the same degree of accuracy. The key difference between the three<br />

forecasts is the degree of aggregation.<br />

4.4.2 Components of a forecast<br />

A Company can create useful forecasts, if it <strong>in</strong>terprets the past correctly. Customer<br />

demands be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by a variety of factors and can be predicted if a company can<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the relationship between the current value of these factors and future demand.<br />

For good demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g, company must identify the factors that <strong>in</strong>fluence future<br />

demand and then ascerta<strong>in</strong> the relationship between these factors and future demand.<br />

Before a ref<strong>in</strong>ery selects a forecast<strong>in</strong>g method, it must clearly know what the<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong>'s response time is as this <strong>in</strong>formation determ<strong>in</strong>es when the forecast need to<br />

be made. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery must also know about numerous factors that may be related to the<br />

demand forecast, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• Past demand<br />

• State of the economy<br />

• Competitors volumes<br />

• Newcompetitors<br />

• Government policies<br />

A ref<strong>in</strong>ery must understand such factors before select<strong>in</strong>g an appropriate<br />

forecast<strong>in</strong>g methodology.<br />

4.4.3 Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Method for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Methods can be classified accord<strong>in</strong>g to the follow<strong>in</strong>g four types.<br />

Qualitative: They are most appropriate when there are little historical data<br />

available or when experts have market <strong>in</strong>telligence that is critical <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g the forecast.<br />

Such method may be necessary to forecast demand several years <strong>in</strong>to the future <strong>in</strong> a new<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Time series: Time series forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods use historical demand to make a<br />

forecast. They are based on the assumption that past demand history is a good <strong>in</strong>dicator<br />

of future demand. These methods are most appropriate when the environmental<br />

situation is stable and the basic demand pattern does not vary significantly from one year<br />

to the next.<br />

118


Causal: Causal forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>in</strong>volveassum<strong>in</strong>g that the demand forecast is<br />

highly correlated with certa<strong>in</strong> factors <strong>in</strong> the environment (e.g. the state of the economy)<br />

Causal forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods f<strong>in</strong>d this correlation between demand and environmental<br />

factors and use estimates of what environmental factors will be to forecast future<br />

demand. For example, product pric<strong>in</strong>g is strongly correlated with demand.<br />

Simulation: Simulation forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods imitate the consumer choices that<br />

give rise to demand to arrive at a forecast.<br />

Time series methods are most appropriate when future demand is expected to<br />

follow historical patterns. When a ref<strong>in</strong>ery attempts to forecast demand based on<br />

historical <strong>in</strong>formation, the current demand, any historical growth patterns, and any<br />

historical seasonal patterns will <strong>in</strong>fluence that company's future demand. Moreover with<br />

this forecast<strong>in</strong>g method, there is always a random element that cannot be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

current demand, historical patterns or seasonality. Therefore, any observed demand can<br />

be broken down <strong>in</strong>to a systematic and random component.<br />

Observed demand (0) =Systematic Component(s) + Random Component(s)<br />

The systematic component measures the expected value of demand and consists<br />

of level, the current depersonalized demand, trend, the rate of growth or decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />

demand for the next period, and seasonally, the predictable seasonal fluctuation <strong>in</strong><br />

demand.<br />

The objective of forecast<strong>in</strong>g is to filter out the random component (noise) and<br />

estimate the systematic component. The difference between the forecast and actual<br />

demand is forecast error.<br />

Out of these methods time series forecast<strong>in</strong>g is most suitable for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Adaptive category of time series method is ideal for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In adaptive forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods, companies update their estimates of the various parts (eg. Level, trend,<br />

seasonality) of the systematic component of demand after they make each demand<br />

observation. Adaptive methods assume that a portion of the error is attributed to<br />

<strong>in</strong>correct estimation of the systematic component with the rest attributed to the random<br />

component. This method updates the systematic component after each demand<br />

observation. Adaptive methods <strong>in</strong>clude mov<strong>in</strong>g averages, simple exponential smooth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and exponential smooth<strong>in</strong>g with corrections for trend and seasonality. Exponential<br />

119


4.4.4.1 Understand the Objective of Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The first step a ref<strong>in</strong>ery should take is to clarify the objective of the forecast. The<br />

objective of every forecast is to support decisions that are needed for the forecast. All<br />

parties affected by a supply cha<strong>in</strong> decision should know the l<strong>in</strong>k between the decision and<br />

the forecast. For example, as per the forecast the diesel demand is go<strong>in</strong>g to be more <strong>in</strong><br />

December. All parties must thus come up with a common forecast for a shared plan of<br />

action based on the forecast. Failure to make decisions jo<strong>in</strong>tly may result <strong>in</strong> either too<br />

much or too little product <strong>in</strong> various stages of the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. At this stage the ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

must specify whether it wants a forecast based on geography, products or aggregate plan.<br />

Forecast horizon is the time lag between the po<strong>in</strong>t at which the forecast is made and the<br />

event be<strong>in</strong>g forecast. For example, the crude purchase plann<strong>in</strong>g starts two months <strong>in</strong><br />

advance. So the forecast<strong>in</strong>g for the month of December must be over at least by<br />

September.<br />

Integrated Demand Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Forecast<strong>in</strong>g. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery should l<strong>in</strong>k its forecast<br />

to all plann<strong>in</strong>g activities with<strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong> that will use the forecast. This <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

capacity plann<strong>in</strong>g, production plann<strong>in</strong>g and purchas<strong>in</strong>g. This l<strong>in</strong>k should exist at both<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation system and the human resource management level. As a variety of functions<br />

are affected by the outcomes of the plann<strong>in</strong>g process, it is important that all of them are<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the forecast<strong>in</strong>g process. Ideal method for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery to have a cross<br />

functional team, with members from each affected function responsible for forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

demand. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery should also <strong>in</strong>volve the people responsible for execut<strong>in</strong>g a plan <strong>in</strong> the<br />

forecast<strong>in</strong>g and plann<strong>in</strong>g process to ensure that all operational issues are taken <strong>in</strong>to<br />

consideration dur<strong>in</strong>g the forecast<strong>in</strong>g and plann<strong>in</strong>g phase.<br />

4.4.4.2 Identify major factors that <strong>in</strong>fluence the Demand forecast<br />

A proper analysis of these factors is central for develop<strong>in</strong>g an appropriate<br />

forecast<strong>in</strong>g technique. The ma<strong>in</strong> factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g forecasts are demand, supply and<br />

product related phenomena. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery must ascerta<strong>in</strong> whether demand is grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

consistent or has a seasonal pattern. These estimates must be based on demand not on<br />

sales data. On the supply side, a ref<strong>in</strong>ery must consider the available supply sources to<br />

decide on the accuracy of the forecast desired. Ifalternate supply sources with short lead­<br />

time areavailable, a highly accurate forecast may not be especially important.<br />

121


4.4.4.3 Understand and Identify Area of supply<br />

The area must be selected on the basis of convenience <strong>in</strong> conveyance, proximity of<br />

another ref<strong>in</strong>ery or mode of transportation. Number of <strong>in</strong>dustrial customers and their<br />

percentage consumption also will affect forecast<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

4.4.4.4 Determ<strong>in</strong>e the Appropriate Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Techniques<br />

In select<strong>in</strong>g appropriate forecast<strong>in</strong>g techniques a ref<strong>in</strong>ery must first understand<br />

the dimensions that will be relevant to the forecast. These dimensions <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

geographical area, product groups and customer groups. The ref<strong>in</strong>ery should understand<br />

the differences <strong>in</strong> demand along each dimension. At this stage a firm selects an<br />

appropriate forecast<strong>in</strong>g method from the four methods discussed earlier.<br />

4.4.4.5 Establish Performance and Error Measures for forecast<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>eries must establish clear performance measures to evaluate the accuracy<br />

and timel<strong>in</strong>ess of the forecast. These measures should correlate with the objectives of the<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess decisions based on the forecasts.<br />

All supply cha<strong>in</strong> design and plann<strong>in</strong>g decisions are based on a forecast of customer<br />

demand. These decisions <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> plant and equipment, production­<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g sales force allocation, and workforce hir<strong>in</strong>g. Good demand forecasts have a<br />

significant impact on supply cha<strong>in</strong> performance.<br />

4.4.5 Push Vs Pull<br />

Push systems generally requires <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the form of elaborate material<br />

requirement plann<strong>in</strong>g (MRP) systems to take the master production schedule and roll it<br />

back, creat<strong>in</strong>g schedules for suppliers with quantity and delivery dates. Pull systems<br />

require <strong>in</strong>formation on actual demand to be transmitted extremely quickly through out<br />

the entire cha<strong>in</strong> so that production of products can accurately reflect the real demand.<br />

Oil ref<strong>in</strong>eries are work<strong>in</strong>g on push system. Major disadvantage of push system for<br />

aref<strong>in</strong>ery is the product variety. All the products may not have sufficient demand, so the<br />

hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity and time will <strong>in</strong>crease. The present practice is to select crude oil suitable<br />

for the process so that the distillates with high marg<strong>in</strong> will be the maximum. Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

quantity is decided on the basis of <strong>in</strong>stalled process<strong>in</strong>g capacity. In both the cases<br />

122


variety can be <strong>in</strong>creased depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the availability. By process<strong>in</strong>g one metric tonne<br />

of Bombay high (BH) the ref<strong>in</strong>ery will get Rs. 898 and by process<strong>in</strong>g Labuan the ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

will get only Rs. 395. Ref<strong>in</strong>eries will not get BH for its full demand. The maximum<br />

availability of BH is 325000 MT. To meet the products demand, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery must process<br />

different types of crude oil. For example to meet the demand for Aviation turb<strong>in</strong>e fuel<br />

(ATF), the ref<strong>in</strong>ery must process Iranian Mix (Ir. Mix.) Kuwaity and Basrah light (Basrah<br />

Lt.) Names of crude and its yield of each product is calculated for the constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Crude<br />

oil selected for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery are Bombay High(BH),Qua Iboe (QI), Labuan (L), Miri(M),<br />

Iranian Mix (IM), Kuwaity (K), and Basrah Light (BL) . The problem is discussed below.<br />

The company, from were the data was collected, did not permit to reveal actual<br />

values of the coefficients and constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the LP hence, similar values are used <strong>in</strong><br />

thesis. The values used for solv<strong>in</strong>g LP are only realistic but not real these values provided<br />

<strong>in</strong> thisproblem must not be used as secondary data for any further studies.<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery crude oil optimization<br />

PROBLEM DATA IN EQUATION STYLE<br />

Maximize<br />

+ 898 BH + 797 QI + 393 L + 410 M + 245 IM + 804 K + 657 BL<br />

Subject to<br />

CONSTR 1<br />

+ 1 BH + 1 L + 1 M + 1 IM + 1 K + 1 BL = 705000<br />

CONSTR 3<br />

+ 1 BH = 31500<br />

CONSTR 5<br />

+ 1 BH + 1 QI + 1 L + 1 M = 410000<br />

CONSTR 7<br />

+ 0.046 BH + 1 QI + 1 L + 1 M + 1 IM + 1.2 K + 1.143 BL<br />

= 736000<br />

CONSTR 9<br />

+ 0.12 BH + 0.026 QI + 0.026 L + 0.026 M + 0.031 IM<br />

+ 0.031 K + 0.028 BL = 26000<br />

CONSTR 11<br />

+ 0.547 BH + 0.026 QI + 0.06 L + 0.06 M + 0.07 IM + 0.07 K<br />

+ 0.07 BL = 6300<br />

CONSTR 13<br />

+ 0.522 QI + 0.575 L + 0.56 M + 0.297 IM + 0.267 K<br />

124


+ 0.313 BL = 330000<br />

+ 0.05 1M + 0.05 K = 1000<br />

+ 0.02 1M +<br />

CONSTR 18<br />

0.02 K + 0.02 BL = 6000<br />

+ 0.005 1M +<br />

CONSTR 20<br />

0.025 K + 0.018 BL = 0<br />

+ 0.293 1M +<br />

CONSTR 22<br />

0.323 K + 0.27 BL = 80000<br />

+ 1 Q1 >= 0<br />

CONSTR 24<br />

+ 1 L >=<br />

CONSTR 25<br />

0<br />

+ 1 M


29 CONSTR 22 18353.0000 0.0000<br />

30 CONSTR 23 4152.7340 0.0000<br />

31 CONSTR 24 391107.0000 0.0000<br />

32 CONSTR 25 4950.0000 0.0000<br />

34 CONSTR 27 209900.0000 0.0000<br />

35 CONSTR 28 109900.0000 0.0000<br />

37 CONSTR 30 82111.1200 0.0000<br />

Objective Function Value = 314870100<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery crude oil optimization<br />

SENSITIVIlYANALYSIS OF COST COEFFICIENTS<br />

Variable<br />

Current<br />

Coeff.<br />

Allowable<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

Allowable<br />

Maximum<br />

1 BH 898.0000 -Inf<strong>in</strong>ity 4776.0210<br />

2 QI 797.0000 453.0667 Inf<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

3 L 393.0000 257.2369 786.7452<br />

4 M 410.0000 -Inf<strong>in</strong>ity 507.3396<br />

5 IM 245.0000 -2376.7240 Inf<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

6 K 804.0000 -Inf<strong>in</strong>ity 5138.1720<br />

7 BL 657.0000 -3243.7550 10095.2100<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the values are not real, try<strong>in</strong>g to read mean<strong>in</strong>g from the numerical result is<br />

of less importance and hence it is not done. It has been shown that the problem given<br />

both optimal results and sensitivity analysis. This is <strong>in</strong>dented to give the mode of<br />

selection of crude oil for maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the profit of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery by select<strong>in</strong>g proper<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of crude oils. The LP is developed for 100% efficiency. But ref<strong>in</strong>ery like KRL<br />

iswork<strong>in</strong>g on more than 100% efficiency. Another LP must be developed for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

ifitiswork<strong>in</strong>gmore than 100% efficiency.The same LP will not be suitable because some<br />

crude oils are be<strong>in</strong>g processed <strong>in</strong> the maximum capacity. So the variability is limited to a<br />

few varieties. That is why another model is developed for the purpose.<br />

4.6 Ship Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Model<br />

The crude oil brought to the jetty <strong>in</strong> sea tankers is pumped to ref<strong>in</strong>ery through<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e. This pipel<strong>in</strong>e passes through the heart of the city. In 1971, when the pipel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

were laid the city was small but now because of the growth of the city, the capacity<br />

expansion of the pipel<strong>in</strong>es is almost impossible. Ifthe capacity of the <strong>in</strong>put pipel<strong>in</strong>e has<br />

to be expanded the expenses will be exorbitantly high. So it will not be economical to go<br />

for it. The pipel<strong>in</strong>es for pump<strong>in</strong>g crude oil is therefore one of the major bottlenecks of the<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

The port under consideration is not hav<strong>in</strong>g the facility for receiv<strong>in</strong>g all types of<br />

vessels because of the draft and turn<strong>in</strong>g circle limitations. Due to limitations <strong>in</strong> port<br />

facility and draft, COT cannot receive Suez-max and VLCC vessels. So the crude brought<br />

126


<strong>in</strong>bigvessels need to be shared with other near by ref<strong>in</strong>eries. While shar<strong>in</strong>g crude oil, the<br />

measurement as well as the quality of the crude changes. This ref<strong>in</strong>ery be<strong>in</strong>g at the<br />

southern end of India will be gett<strong>in</strong>g only the last part of the crude, which will be hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

large part of the sediments and water. The depth of the channel to the port is not enough<br />

to br<strong>in</strong>gships at all times of the year. In monsoon time the draft will be low and the crude<br />

oil supply will be very much disturbed due to the draft problem. They can br<strong>in</strong>g only<br />

small ships <strong>in</strong> the monsoon season. So weather is another bottleneck for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Under the above constra<strong>in</strong>ts as a short-term solution the exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities had to be<br />

made best use of. A good schedule of ships carry<strong>in</strong>g crude with m<strong>in</strong>imum overlap would<br />

be the best. The demurrage charges to be paid to ships under these conditions would be<br />

the m<strong>in</strong>imum.<br />

4.6.1 The Problem Characteristics<br />

The objectives of a good crude ship schedule should be two fold, the first be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

able to meet the crude oil requirements of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery and the second do<strong>in</strong>g the above at<br />

the least cost. The variable costs are the ones need<strong>in</strong>g control, and <strong>in</strong> this case it is the<br />

ship charges for the unload<strong>in</strong>g days. (The total days of the ship spends at unload<strong>in</strong>g port<br />

is taken as unload<strong>in</strong>g days and this <strong>in</strong>cludes time spent wait<strong>in</strong>g for the free berth). In the<br />

DSS modelthat we have developed, only the ship cost/ton for unload<strong>in</strong>g days is taken to<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d the m<strong>in</strong>imum. The ship schedules that do not meet the ref<strong>in</strong>ery crude need<br />

satisfaction criteria should not be considered for evaluation by this model. The monthly<br />

ship demurrage paid to crude tankers now is <strong>in</strong> the range of 20 lac /month, It is the huge<br />

demurrage costs that we propose to reduce by select<strong>in</strong>g good ship schedules.<br />

This meet<strong>in</strong>g is held after the ICM every month with Oil Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Committee<br />

(OCC), <strong>Indian</strong> Oil Corporation (lOC) (Shipp<strong>in</strong>g), Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Corporation of India and the<br />

representatives from each ref<strong>in</strong>ery attend<strong>in</strong>g it. The aim of this meet<strong>in</strong>g is to f<strong>in</strong>alize the<br />

Crude allocation to each ref<strong>in</strong>ery by decid<strong>in</strong>g the crude type and parcel size for different<br />

tankers, allott<strong>in</strong>g them to different ref<strong>in</strong>eries and schedul<strong>in</strong>g their arrivals at discharge<br />

ports. The crude requirement for next month of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery projected <strong>in</strong> the ICM is<br />

after consolidation by OCC (Technical) given to IOC (IT). They obta<strong>in</strong> quotes for crude.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial crude shipp<strong>in</strong>g schedule is then made <strong>in</strong> consultation with IOC (Shipp<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

Here, a model that takes as <strong>in</strong>put, data regard<strong>in</strong>g crude and crude tanker availability<br />

from load ports, crude requirement of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery and lay days available at load and<br />

discharge ports and gives as output an optimum crude allotment schedule is used. This<br />

schedule gives the type and quantity of crude allotted to the tanker schedule to reach the<br />

127


4.6.3 Solution Methodologies<br />

The complex nature of this problem requires a model that can effectivelytake <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account, the queu<strong>in</strong>g of Ship at sea, and the times for which a Ship will have to wait for<br />

the tide for movement, for optimization of the system. Mathematical models fail to<br />

capture such complexity. A survey of literature shows that computer simulation is a<br />

widely used tool for port related studies. We have used simulation as a tool for solv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this problem. The steps followed by us are given below:<br />

(1) Understand<strong>in</strong>g the crude oil movement system from the ships at high sea to<br />

the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

(2) Detailed understand<strong>in</strong>g of various subsystems such as Ships, tugs, port<br />

formalities, etc<br />

(3) F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out various constra<strong>in</strong>ts of the system.<br />

(4) Time and other data collection for various Ships such as draft required empty<br />

and full, travel times, ships unload<strong>in</strong>g times etc., and process<strong>in</strong>g them for the<br />

use <strong>in</strong> simulation.<br />

(s) Develop<strong>in</strong>ga simulation model, verification and validation of the same.<br />

(6) Developthe DSS <strong>in</strong>terface with the user and mak<strong>in</strong>g the report<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

4.6.4 Simulation Model<br />

130<br />

Figure 4.7 Event graph


A simulation model is developed us<strong>in</strong>g SIGMA, details of which are available <strong>in</strong><br />

Schruben, a commercially available discrete event simulation package based on event<br />

graph representation of models, converted it <strong>in</strong>to Pascal, modified it and <strong>in</strong>corporated<br />

the Ship load<strong>in</strong>g and unload<strong>in</strong>g rules to get a basic crude ship unload<strong>in</strong>g simulation<br />

model that formed the base of the DSS model used to f<strong>in</strong>d the monthly cost/ton for a<br />

given ship schedule. The event graph for the basic ship-schedul<strong>in</strong>g model is given <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 4.7. A brief description of the events represented by the nodes of the event is given<br />

<strong>in</strong> Table 4.8 . The model uses follow<strong>in</strong>gassumptions:<br />

• The tide data used has been taken from the tide Table of 1999.<br />

• The pilot and tugs are available at any time.<br />

Table4.8 Descnptlon<br />

0 events In even: graPIh 0fth e simu . Iation modl e<br />

Node Name Description<br />

EDDAY Marks end ofday and writes daily statistics <strong>in</strong>output file<br />

SETIER Resets the variables used for collect<strong>in</strong>g daily statistics<br />

ETIDE Locates the appropriate start<strong>in</strong>g low and high tides for the day<br />

DRAFT Reads the subsequent low and high tide values atappropriate times<br />

STDRFT Sets the movement times <strong>in</strong>creek for all Ships depend<strong>in</strong>g on tide<br />

SHIPAR Represents arrival ofa ship atan anchorage location<br />

SHIPLV Ship leaves the Anchorage ifcompletely empty<br />

CKTIDE Check for tide for sail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to creek<br />

SAlLSTR Start sail<strong>in</strong>g through Creek towards Jetty if Tide permits<br />

RHBRTH The loaded Ship reaches the Jetty and prepares toberth<br />

BRTH Ship berths atJetty and starts unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />

EDUNLD Unload<strong>in</strong>g ofShip isover<br />

LEVBTH The Ship isready to leave the berth after unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />

LEVJTY Check if tide iffavorable toleave the Jetty<br />

MOVBAC Ship starts sail<strong>in</strong>g back<br />

BKACH Back toHigh Sea Anchorage<br />

TRIGER Trigger RETRY and WAIT nodes when favor<strong>in</strong>g tide occurs<br />

RETRY Trigger movement ofwait<strong>in</strong>g full Ship through channel when tide favors<br />

WAIT Start movement ofwait<strong>in</strong>g empty Ship through channel when tide favours<br />

NIGHT End ofNight<br />

DAY End ofdaylight occurs<br />

131


Input the next ship schedule tobe evaluated.<br />

Run the crude ship unload<strong>in</strong>g simulation model with the ship schedule <strong>in</strong>put and getthe cost per<br />

ton and other details.<br />

Save the cost I ton values forthe schedule.<br />

NO<br />

YES<br />

Compare the cost per ton forall qiven schedules and select the one with lowest cost.<br />

STOP<br />

Figure4.8. Flow chart show<strong>in</strong>g logicused <strong>in</strong> ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g optimization model<br />

4.6.5 Model Validation<br />

We have used the white box method of validation. In this method the actual logic<br />

of operation was compared with that followed <strong>in</strong> the simulation model to make them the<br />

same. For this the detailed schedule of ship unload<strong>in</strong>g for the month shown below was<br />

compared with what would happen <strong>in</strong> reality for both sequence of events and their times<br />

ofoccurrence and the model was validated.<br />

132


12.0 45000.0 11.8 15.8 17.0 5.2<br />

13.0 45000.0 12.7 17.4 18.6 6.0<br />

17.0 45000.0 16.7 19.0 20.3 3.5<br />

17.0 45000.0 16.7 20.6 21.9 5.1<br />

18.0 45000.0 17.9 22.2 23.5 5.5<br />

22.0 45000.0 22.0 24.1 25.3 3.3<br />

24.0 45000.0 23.6 25.7 26.9 3.4<br />

26.0 45000.0 25.8 27.3 28.6 2.8<br />

28.0 45000.0 27.9 28.9 30.2 2.3<br />

Summary of the statistics of this SIMULATION run<br />

Number of Crude Tankers that arrived =18<br />

MINIMUM stay of a crude tanker at Kochi was for 1.5 days<br />

AVERAGE stay of a crude tanker at Kochi was for 4.5 days<br />

MAXIMUM stay of a crude tanker at Kochi was for 7.4 days<br />

TOTAL COSTof ship hire for unload<strong>in</strong>g days Rupees 40800000.00<br />

AVERAGE ship hire cost per ton for the period is Rupees 50.37per Ton<br />

It is demonstrated <strong>in</strong> this section how a simulation model run with different<br />

parameters and coupled with a search technique can be used as an optimiz<strong>in</strong>g decision<br />

support system. Such models can be of great help <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g complex decisions such as the<br />

optimal ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g. The models made for such specific tasks can also be modified to<br />

evaluate different alternative changes or improvements proposed <strong>in</strong> the system studied.<br />

The analyst has however to be very careful <strong>in</strong> the verification and validation of the<br />

models used on which all the results depend. A word of caution is necessary at this stage,<br />

the results presented <strong>in</strong> this paper are case specific because of the cost, time, logic and<br />

other case specific data <strong>in</strong> the model. What is more general and of <strong>in</strong>terest to<br />

practitioners <strong>in</strong> the field should be the methodology and the models used by us, which<br />

can bereplicated and used <strong>in</strong> similar cases elsewhere.<br />

4.7. Internal Logistics Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Internal logistics deals with the delivery of crude oil from storage tanks,<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil, <strong>in</strong>termediate storage of streams, f<strong>in</strong>al storage of products and<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g of products. Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance plans of all the equipment will affect the performance<br />

of<strong>in</strong>ternal logistics.<br />

4.7.1. Flexibility of storage tanks<br />

The production plann<strong>in</strong>g decides what types of crude to be processed on each day<br />

and depends on the plann<strong>in</strong>g as discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Tanks are grouped together for<br />

the purpose of storage of products. The group<strong>in</strong>g is ma<strong>in</strong>ly on the basis of connectivity.<br />

135


Sequence of utilization of tanks, which tank must be filled first and which must be<br />

the second and so on. This <strong>in</strong>formation will reduce the operation effort as well as easy<br />

discharge of products as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.10.<br />

It also must give desirable number of tanks to be grouped for easy operations. It<br />

will also take care of fluctuation <strong>in</strong> the product demand.It must also give ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

schedule for the tanks. Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of tanks is time consum<strong>in</strong>g processes. So it must be<br />

planned <strong>in</strong> advance for less disturbance to the supply cha<strong>in</strong> system.<br />

4.7.2 Process<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil<br />

Decision on process<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil is dependent on the quality of crude, quantity<br />

of crude, ratio of each crude products planned, availability of storage capacity for each<br />

product and product specification.<br />

Quantity of<br />

crude<br />

Information on<br />

previous process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Quality of<br />

crude<br />

Product<br />

Variety<br />

Demand for<br />

products<br />

CRUDE PROCESSING<br />

Flgure4.11 Crude process<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />

Specification of<br />

products<br />

Storage<br />

capacity<br />

Information (data)<br />

gather<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Almost all ref<strong>in</strong>eries have automatic process control. All the controls can be made<br />

from the control room. In the supply cha<strong>in</strong> angle, improvement of process will yield<br />

comparatively lesser returns. So <strong>in</strong> this study improvement <strong>in</strong> process is not considered.<br />

As per records of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery (Annual report, KRL, 2002) it is work<strong>in</strong>g at more than<br />

100% rated capacity for the last few years. This also <strong>in</strong>dicates that the scope for<br />

improvement <strong>in</strong> process will be limited.<br />

137


4.7.3 Blend<strong>in</strong>g of products.<br />

Distillates with correct specification cannot be directly obta<strong>in</strong>ed from distillation<br />

streams. Specification varies with customer and use. Specification of products changes<br />

with many parameters and they cannot be corrected directly <strong>in</strong> the distillation column.<br />

Solution to this problem is blend<strong>in</strong>g of streams to get the correct specification. The<br />

commonly adopted blend<strong>in</strong>g procedures are given below.<br />

• Batch blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Partial <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Off unit blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Base stock blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Batch Blend<strong>in</strong>g is done <strong>in</strong> tanks. One tank will be filled up to 90% of its capacity<br />

from the distillation column. Specification of the products will be tested <strong>in</strong> the<br />

laboratory. Laboratory will suggest the streams to be added to the tank for gett<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

correct specification. Blend<strong>in</strong>g is done separately for each tank and its control is manual.<br />

Partial <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g is done by controll<strong>in</strong>g the flow to the collection tanks.<br />

Initial blend<strong>in</strong>g is done by add<strong>in</strong>g multiple stream products to the blend<strong>in</strong>g tank and<br />

correct<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend after f<strong>in</strong>al lab analysis with small quantities of f<strong>in</strong>al touchup<br />

streams. This is also a manually controlled system.<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g is done by controll<strong>in</strong>g the flows of streams from<br />

different process or tanks to get the specification. This is normally done <strong>in</strong> the time of<br />

delivery of products. Products from distillation columns will be stored <strong>in</strong> tanks and their<br />

specification will be noted. Depends on the demand for the f<strong>in</strong>al product, the volume of<br />

each <strong>in</strong>gredient will be admitted to the flow. Blend<strong>in</strong>g is tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> the pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al product, which is delivered, will be with correct specification. This is good for<br />

products with variation <strong>in</strong> specification. When the products are supplied to different<br />

markets, <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g will be ideal. Such complicated blend<strong>in</strong>g systems are best<br />

controlled fullyby computer.<br />

Off unit blend<strong>in</strong>g is done at distant location where the product specification is not<br />

sure. For example export of product is tak<strong>in</strong>g place from port. Storage facility is provided<br />

near the port. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery will not know when the shipment will take place and to which<br />

dest<strong>in</strong>ation. Dest<strong>in</strong>ation and customer decides the specification. It will be difficult to<br />

keep products with specification suitable for all customers. So basic streams will be<br />

138


stored <strong>in</strong> the tanks and the blend<strong>in</strong>g will take place only at the time of load<strong>in</strong>g to ship or<br />

it will be blended <strong>in</strong> to a different tank before load<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Base -stockblend<strong>in</strong>g is the blend<strong>in</strong>g of different types of crude oils to get products<br />

with required specification. This method will not give the correct specification still m<strong>in</strong>or<br />

corrections will be good enough to have the required specification. The process of<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g is easier <strong>in</strong> this method. The major disadvantage is the base stock variety<br />

requirement.<br />

Variation <strong>in</strong>market<br />

demand ..<br />

Quantity <strong>in</strong>demand<br />

Storage capacity<br />

Level ofautomation<br />

..<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g decision model<br />

Type ofblend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 4.12 Blend<strong>in</strong>g decision mak<strong>in</strong>g model<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g method cannot be changed very easily after select<strong>in</strong>g one. So the<br />

selection must be made very carefully. The major factors to be considered are given<br />

below. Variation <strong>in</strong> Market demand: Variation <strong>in</strong> specification of products is major factor<br />

to be considered for the selection of blend<strong>in</strong>g technique. If the company is plann<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

supply markets <strong>in</strong> different areas then the product specification will be different.<br />

Frequent changes <strong>in</strong> specification also may be required. Then on l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g will be<br />

ideal butlevelof automation affects the consistency of specification.<br />

Quantity <strong>in</strong> demand: If large quantity of product is required for a longer<br />

period, then batch blend<strong>in</strong>g also will be enough. Blended products can be stored because<br />

the demand is assured.<br />

Storage capacity: storage capacity requirement will be more if the blended<br />

products are stored <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. It will require less storage capacity if basic streams<br />

are stored. Aga<strong>in</strong>it depends on the demand, quantity and variety.<br />

Level of automation: Level of automation is to be considered for types of<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g. Batchblend<strong>in</strong>g requires less automation where as <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g high level of<br />

automation is required for better performance.<br />

A decision mak<strong>in</strong>g model will give a better solution because many blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods are available and a variety of constra<strong>in</strong>ts are also available.<br />

139


4.8 Outbound Logistic Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Outbound logistic plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves the plann<strong>in</strong>g of transport <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

selection of mode of transport, total quantity to be moved, quantity to be moved <strong>in</strong> each<br />

mode of transport, and types of products to be moved. Load<strong>in</strong>g system selection is a<br />

design problem. The performance of the system depends on the efficiency of the system.<br />

Region wise demand of products must be decided on the basis of the consumption <strong>in</strong><br />

each retail outlet. The consumption decides the quantity to be transported to the<br />

location. This necessitates the selection of mode of transport, which is discussed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

next section<br />

4.8.1.Transport Mode Selection Model<br />

Selection of mode for movement of ref<strong>in</strong>ed product is another area, which can<br />

contribute to profit. Selection must be made from the commonly used modes- pipel<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

ship, wagon and truck. All modes except pipel<strong>in</strong>e have a m<strong>in</strong>imum charge for<br />

transport<strong>in</strong>g the product.<br />

Truck transport<strong>in</strong>g can be taken as an example.<br />

Table 4.10 Calculation cost<strong>in</strong> truck transport<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum charge A Rs.500.00<br />

Quantity Transported B 12,000 kilograms<br />

Distance transported C 100 kms (assumed)<br />

Rate per kilometer D Rs. 0.9023nit<br />

Total (A+ BxCx D) E Rs.10821·<br />

Table 4.11 DSS fortransport mode'selectlon<br />

Mode<br />

M<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Cost<br />

Qty. Disl. Rate Total<br />

Pipel<strong>in</strong>e A B C D E<br />

Ship A B C D E<br />

Wagon A B C D E<br />

Truck A B C D E<br />

Total cost of all the modes of transport can be calculated like this. Calculation can<br />

be made accurately by the help of spreadsheet as given <strong>in</strong> Table 4.9. Decision to select<br />

mode of transport can be taken very easily by compar<strong>in</strong>g the total cost and select<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

mode with m<strong>in</strong>imum cost. So this model can be taken as a DSS <strong>in</strong> the outbound logistics.<br />

A few places are considered for establish<strong>in</strong>g the feasibility of the transportation<br />

mode selection model. Product supply<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ery is situated at Kochi. Places considered<br />

for studyare Thiruvanathapuram, Kollam, Chennai, and Kolkata.<br />

Thiruvanathapuram needs supply of veriety of products like MS, diesel,<br />

bitumen, etc. Distance from Kochi is taken as Table 4.12 Cost to Trivandrum<br />

340 km. Requirement of quantity of all items<br />

added together is 600000 liters. This must be<br />

distributed to different outlets. Central<br />

140<br />

M<strong>in</strong>. Cost Rate! Km Total<br />

Pipel<strong>in</strong>e --- ---- ---<br />

Ship 300000 250 351000<br />

Waaon 200000 320 265280<br />

Truck 500 .9023 184570


storage facility is not available at Thiruvanathapuram. Ifrailway wagons have to be used,<br />

then the distribution to retail outlets will <strong>in</strong>cur additional cost. Model gives the solution<br />

as truck transport through road because that is hav<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong>imum total cost.<br />

KoUam needs supply of naphtha <strong>in</strong> bulk quantity for the power plant and small<br />

quantity of MS and diesel. MS and diesel can be transported us<strong>in</strong>g trucks because the<br />

distance is small and delivery is at different Table 4.13 Cost to Kollam<br />

locations. Quantity requirement of all the items<br />

except naphtha is 596000 liters and the distance<br />

transported is 285 km. From Table 4.13 it is<br />

clear that pipel<strong>in</strong>e is the economic mode for<br />

M<strong>in</strong>. Cost Rate! Km Total<br />

Pipel<strong>in</strong>e 50000<br />

Ship 300000 250 342500<br />

Wagon 200000 320 254360<br />

Irruck 500 .9023 153800<br />

naphtha transportation. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t delivery and large quantity regular supply makes<br />

the pipel<strong>in</strong>e transfer viable. Cost for <strong>in</strong>stallation of pipel<strong>in</strong>e is distributed for 10 years for<br />

the purpose of calculat<strong>in</strong>g the cost of transfer through pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Chennai needs supply of all type of products <strong>in</strong> large quantities at times. The<br />

demand is not consistent. Chennai has the port facility also to handle ships. Bulk storage<br />

facility is also available at chennai. So any mode<br />

oftransport is technically feasible for Chennai.<br />

Demand from Chennai is dependent on supply<br />

from local ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Average consumption is<br />

600000 litres and the distance to chennai is<br />

Table 4.14 Cost to Chennai<br />

M<strong>in</strong>. Cost Rate! Km Total<br />

Pipel<strong>in</strong>e ---------<br />

Ship 300000 250 397500<br />

Wagon 200000 320 324800<br />

Truck 500 .9023 353400<br />

taken 650 km. When they cannot meet the demand, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery at Kochi must meet it.<br />

From the Table 4.14 it is clear that both sea and railway wagons are better options for<br />

Chennai.<br />

Kolkata also requires supply of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products from Kochi occationally. A<br />

permanent set up like pipel<strong>in</strong>e will not be Table 415 Cost to Kolkata<br />

feasible. It is clear from the Table 4.15 that the<br />

most economic mode of transport to Kolkata is<br />

ship. Kolkata is also hav<strong>in</strong>g seaport and<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g and storage facilities at port. Distance<br />

M<strong>in</strong>. Cost Rate! Km Total<br />

Pipel<strong>in</strong>e -----<br />

Ship 300000 25C 675000<br />

Wagon 200000 320 680000<br />

Truck 500 .9023 1353950<br />

from Kochi to Kolkata is taken as 3000 km for calculation and the quantity to be<br />

transported is taken as 500000 liters.<br />

141


4.9 CONCLUSION<br />

Logistic problem was divided <strong>in</strong> to two stages namely design and plann<strong>in</strong>g. Areas,<br />

which can not be improved after <strong>in</strong>stallation, are design stage problems. Plann<strong>in</strong>g is done<br />

for both facility deign and operation. For improv<strong>in</strong>g the effectiveness of plann<strong>in</strong>g, it is<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> sub-classified <strong>in</strong> to annual plan, roll<strong>in</strong>g plan, and daily plan. Decisions to be taken<br />

ateach level were identified <strong>in</strong> the plan zone with respect to <strong>in</strong>bound logistics, <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

logistics, and outbound logistics. A hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g model was developed for giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

aclearpicture of decisions to be taken at each stage. This will also give an idea about the<br />

source of <strong>in</strong>put data for plann<strong>in</strong>g. Source of <strong>in</strong>formation can be either from previous plan<br />

period or from outside the plann<strong>in</strong>g system. Model developed will help <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

the sequence <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g. Tools required for plann<strong>in</strong>g at each stage were identified and<br />

separated <strong>in</strong> to annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, short term plann<strong>in</strong>g and daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. These are given<br />

<strong>in</strong> Table form for the easy reference. Demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g is the first stage <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Demand for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products is not the same every month. It changes with seasons and<br />

socio-economic conditions. So a model was developed to make the forecast<strong>in</strong>g better and<br />

more reliable. In the model consumption of products <strong>in</strong> the previous years was taken as<br />

the <strong>in</strong>put data. A six-step approach to demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g is developed for the<br />

implementation of the model <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of forecast with all plann<strong>in</strong>g areas of<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> is essential to have better plann<strong>in</strong>g. This six-step approach will help <strong>in</strong><br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g it. Crude selection and purchase is another important function <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Due to the l<strong>in</strong>ear nature of the problem an LPP was developed to solve the problem.<br />

Maximiz<strong>in</strong>g net back was the objective function. Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery will have different set of<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts. An example of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited (KRL) was taken for verify<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

applicability of the model. Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude oil to the ref<strong>in</strong>ery is the next important<br />

function. This function is also hav<strong>in</strong>g a number of variables like tide <strong>in</strong> the port. A<br />

simulation model was developed for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g. The model will give number of<br />

ships to be brought and the associated cost for br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude oil. This model can be used<br />

as DSS for ship selection with m<strong>in</strong>imum demurrage payment to the shipp<strong>in</strong>g company.<br />

Internal logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure was also discussed <strong>in</strong> this section to reduce starv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and block<strong>in</strong>g of facilities <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the facilities are tightly coupled so<br />

the freedom for flexibility was limited for logistic purposes. Modes of transport for<br />

product <strong>in</strong> outbound logistics are also analyzed and a model is developed for select<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transport mode to a particular place for def<strong>in</strong>ite quantity and variety of products. These<br />

models will help <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g systematic plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and<br />

outbound logistics.<br />

142


5.1 Introduction<br />

CHAPTER V<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> and<br />

Information Technology<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management system has three major components. They are<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation flow, material flow, and cash flow. SCM systems are used to improve<br />

the speed and accuracy of <strong>in</strong>formation flow to make system effective and<br />

efficient, and to make fast and reliable cash flow. Functional requirements to<br />

achieve the above are discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />

Information Technology is the backbone of success of any SCM system,<br />

Cachon and Fisher [2000]. The development <strong>in</strong> cost reduction started from<br />

efficient utilization of facilities us<strong>in</strong>g statistical tools. With the predicted demand<br />

it sub-optimizes at different levels to m<strong>in</strong>imize the cost of production plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and schedul<strong>in</strong>g of everyth<strong>in</strong>g on the basis of product consumption <strong>in</strong> the market,<br />

[P<strong>in</strong>to and Grossmann, 1998]. Consumption of customer is monitored on real<br />

time basis and that <strong>in</strong>formation is used for plann<strong>in</strong>g and reschedul<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

production, [Sah<strong>in</strong>idis and Grossman.ioci]. Movement of material from supplier<br />

retailer is on the basis of the new schedule. A strong support of computer<br />

network is essential for the success of SCM. Intranet, extranet and Internet can<br />

be used for the data collection and convert<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to useful <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

Suggestion for us<strong>in</strong>g these technologies <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is given <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Data<br />

generation is another important area where ref<strong>in</strong>eries need a lot of impert<strong>in</strong>ence.<br />

Same data is reproduced at different functional levels and this reduces the<br />

authenticityof <strong>in</strong>formation. Once data is generated, data must be used from the<br />

source itself at all functional levels, [Thonemann.zooa]. It will reduce<br />

redundancy of data. Ma<strong>in</strong> data generation is production department and<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g, operation and control departments use it. Data generation and flow<br />

management<strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g operation and control is discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />

143


U Problem and objective<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Petroleum</strong> Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eers, ma<strong>in</strong>ly chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eers. S<strong>in</strong>ce they are technically tra<strong>in</strong>ed their<br />

focus ismostly on ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g operations and its improvement. Logistics is sidel<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Therefore <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> related data collection, record<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

generation are the weak areas <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Data collection and entry <strong>in</strong> to the<br />

computer is not made at the place of supply cha<strong>in</strong> operation. Repetition of data<br />

collection and entry by different agencies is also common. This creates problems<br />

specially when there is difference between the values of the same data collected<br />

by different agencies. Lack of common standard norms of data collection and<br />

<strong>in</strong>sufficient network<strong>in</strong>g and data shar<strong>in</strong>g is the ma<strong>in</strong> reason for this type of error.<br />

Develop<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>formation flow model for mak<strong>in</strong>g seM software for a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery is the ma<strong>in</strong> objective of this chapter. Detailed study is made on the data<br />

collection methods at all stages from customer to the crude oil supplier and<br />

convert<strong>in</strong>g them to <strong>in</strong>formation to be used for decision mak<strong>in</strong>g at different levels<br />

of management <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Ma<strong>in</strong> features required for the software are also<br />

discussed. Information flow at each module level must be developed and they<br />

must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated to get a complete <strong>in</strong>formation flow model. Different<br />

Information System tools and Technologies used <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

are alsopresented <strong>in</strong> this chapter. The areas where each of these can be used <strong>in</strong> a<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery supply cha<strong>in</strong> are also po<strong>in</strong>ted out here.<br />

5.3 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Components.<br />

The nature of bus<strong>in</strong>ess enterprise is chang<strong>in</strong>g. Today's bus<strong>in</strong>ess is<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly "boundary less" mean<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>ternal functional barriers are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

eroded <strong>in</strong> favour of horizontal process management. The separation between<br />

suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and customers is reduc<strong>in</strong>g. This is the idea<br />

of extended enterprise, which is transform<strong>in</strong>g organization to complete <strong>in</strong> the<br />

market. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Bowersox and Daugherty (1995), characteristics of modern<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> are flexibility, quick response, reliability, and adaptability.<br />

144


10% Profit 11% Profit 5% Profit 6% Profit<br />

40%<br />

Production<br />

Value<br />

addition<br />

20%<br />

Logistic Logistic<br />

Figure 5.2 Effect of sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> logistic onprofitcompared to output improvement<br />

There is considerable scope <strong>in</strong> many ref<strong>in</strong>eries for better management of<br />

logistics costs and hence for profit leverage. Figure 5.2 highlights the possibility<br />

of improv<strong>in</strong>g profit when profit marg<strong>in</strong>s are low relative to distribution costs. A<br />

hidden cost of logistics is the <strong>in</strong>terest charged on <strong>in</strong>ventory, tanks, and pipel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Because this is rarely separately identified by most management account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

systems. Any reduction <strong>in</strong> hidden cost will directly <strong>in</strong>crease profit. So<br />

improvement <strong>in</strong> efficiencyof logistics is easy and urgent area for competitiveness<br />

<strong>in</strong> the market.<br />

The value cha<strong>in</strong> activities (Figure 5.3) can be categorized as <strong>in</strong>bound<br />

logistics, <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics, outbound logistics, and market<strong>in</strong>g and sales. To ga<strong>in</strong><br />

competitiveadvantage over its rivals, a ref<strong>in</strong>ery must deliver value to its customer<br />

through perform<strong>in</strong>g these activities more effectively than its competitors or by<br />

perform<strong>in</strong>g the activities <strong>in</strong> a unique way that creates greater differentiation.<br />

Logistic management has the potential to assist the organization <strong>in</strong> the<br />

achievement of both cost/productivity advantage and a value advantage<br />

Inbound<br />

Logistics<br />

Figure 5.3 The value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Operations<br />

& Internal<br />

Logistics<br />

146<br />

Outbound<br />

Logistics


5.3.1.1. Inbound Logistics<br />

Inbound logistics <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong>volves locat<strong>in</strong>g crude oil supplier, mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the contract, and arrang<strong>in</strong>g shipment from supplier to the purchaser, facility<br />

management <strong>in</strong> the unload<strong>in</strong>g port, and transport<strong>in</strong>g from unload<strong>in</strong>g port to<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eryand storage at ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Published data is available to get details on quality of crude oil of each<br />

location <strong>in</strong> different part of the world. Suitable and economic crude can be<br />

selectedand the ref<strong>in</strong>ery can enter <strong>in</strong>to purchase agreement. Purchase agreement<br />

can be either long term or spot purchase. Once purchase is made schedule of<br />

delivery can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed and shipp<strong>in</strong>g companies can be contacted for<br />

transport<strong>in</strong>g. Many shipp<strong>in</strong>g companies are do<strong>in</strong>g this crude oil transport<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

different capacity ships. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the crude demand and facility at<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g port, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery can select the right type of ship through shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agents. Manag<strong>in</strong>g facilities at unload<strong>in</strong>g port <strong>in</strong>cludes check<strong>in</strong>g of draft with port<br />

trust, availability of port facility, pilots, and availability of tugs. Normally these<br />

arrangements are done through shipp<strong>in</strong>g agents. Ref<strong>in</strong>eries do not directly<br />

<strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong>to shipp<strong>in</strong>g activities, they will entrust clear<strong>in</strong>g and forward<strong>in</strong>g agents<br />

with the schedule of ship arrivals. Followup of ship arrivals also will be done by<br />

clear<strong>in</strong>g and forward<strong>in</strong>g agent at unload<strong>in</strong>g port. Transport<strong>in</strong>g from port to<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eryis usually through pipel<strong>in</strong>e. These will be exclusivepipel<strong>in</strong>es for crude oil<br />

transport<strong>in</strong>g from port to ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Logistic management has the potential to assist a ref<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>in</strong> the<br />

achievement of both cost and productivity advantage and value advantage. Figure<br />

5.4suggest ways <strong>in</strong> which productivity can be enhanced through logisticsand the<br />

prospects for ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a value advantage <strong>in</strong> the market place through customer<br />

service. In short the ref<strong>in</strong>eries that will be the leader <strong>in</strong> the market of the future<br />

will be those that have sought and achieved the tw<strong>in</strong> peaks of excellence: they<br />

havega<strong>in</strong>ed both cost leadership and serviceleadership.<br />

The under ly<strong>in</strong>g philosophy beh<strong>in</strong>d the logisticsconceptis that of plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation, the materials flow from source to user as an <strong>in</strong>tegrated system<br />

147


ather than manag<strong>in</strong>g the goods flow as a series of <strong>in</strong>dependent activities. Thus<br />

under the logistics management regime the goal is to l<strong>in</strong>k the market place, the<br />

distribution network, the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g processes, and the procurement activity<br />

<strong>in</strong>such a way that<br />

Value advantage<br />

Tailored service<br />

Reliability<br />

Responsiveness<br />

Superior<br />

Customer<br />

Value<br />

Productivity advantage<br />

Logistic leverage opportunities<br />

Capacity utilization<br />

Asset turn<br />

Schedule <strong>in</strong>tearation<br />

Figure 5.4 Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Competitive advantage through supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

customers are serviced at higher levels and yet at lower cost. In other wards to<br />

achieve the goal of competitive advantage through both cost reduction and<br />

service enhancement.<br />

5.3.1.2 Operational and <strong>in</strong>ternal Logistics<br />

In this thesis ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g operations <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is termed as operations.<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> Functions <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> operations are the control of delivery of crude oil<br />

from storage tanks to <strong>in</strong>itial distillation columns, storage of distillates or streams<br />

<strong>in</strong> tanks, treatment of streams for convert<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to products, selection of processes<br />

forgett<strong>in</strong>g products, and blend<strong>in</strong>g operations.<br />

To improve operations management and flexibility, logistics management<br />

must be improved. Flexibility <strong>in</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g from any crude oil tank to any<br />

distillation column and distillation column to any stream tank must be possible.<br />

As on today <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries are designat<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> tanks to store a set of fixed<br />

tanks and normally those tanks are kept filled with blended products. Storage of<br />

148


lended products reduces flexibility and <strong>in</strong>creases storage cost. If streams are<br />

stored <strong>in</strong> tanks, designation of tanks can be m<strong>in</strong>imized and delivery from<br />

distillation columns can be less complicated. This will <strong>in</strong>tern reduce number of<br />

trunks required for storage of products. Moreover a variety of products can be<br />

supplied to customers as per their vary<strong>in</strong>g demand. Internal logistics is a<br />

neglected area <strong>in</strong> almost all ref<strong>in</strong>eries. But <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics only can improve<br />

flexibility. So <strong>in</strong> the near future all <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>eries will realize the importance of<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal logistics.<br />

5.3.1.3 Outbound Logistics<br />

Outbound logistics <strong>in</strong>volves the movement of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products from<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery to customer. Two methods are <strong>in</strong> practice <strong>in</strong> India. One is ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

directly supply<strong>in</strong>g to the retailer and the other is ref<strong>in</strong>ery supply to market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies and they distribute to retailers. For example Reliance Petrochemical<br />

Limited (RPL) is not hav<strong>in</strong>g their own outlets <strong>in</strong>stead they are sell<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Indian</strong><br />

Oil Corporation (lOC). IOC is do<strong>in</strong>g their own ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and market<strong>in</strong>g. Indo­<br />

Burma <strong>Petroleum</strong> (IBP) is hav<strong>in</strong>g only market<strong>in</strong>g no ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery like KRL<br />

is hav<strong>in</strong>g very few own outlets and market<strong>in</strong>g is ma<strong>in</strong>ly done by H<strong>in</strong>dustan<br />

<strong>Petroleum</strong> Limited (HPL).<br />

Transportation can be us<strong>in</strong>g pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship, rail or road. As discussed <strong>in</strong><br />

chapter 3, pipe l<strong>in</strong>e is the cheapest for bulk transport<strong>in</strong>g but can not be easily<br />

used for small quantities. Small quantities <strong>in</strong> remote places can be supplied only<br />

through road. Coastal cities can be supplied through sea. The last option for ma<strong>in</strong><br />

cities is rail.<br />

5.3.1.4 Market<strong>in</strong>g and Sales<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g and sales were not treated as important activities <strong>in</strong> petroleum<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> India because the market was protected and supply was just sufficient<br />

to match the demand. Import of ref<strong>in</strong>ed products were restricted by Government<br />

of India (Gol). April 2002 onwards <strong>Indian</strong> market is not price controlled and not<br />

free from competition. So far companies like RPL were not permitted to market<br />

149


their products <strong>in</strong> India. But now any company can market their own products or<br />

import for market<strong>in</strong>g. This will necessitate extensive market surveys and sales<br />

promotion techniques. Till April 2002, companies were do<strong>in</strong>g market research<br />

and sales promotion only for lubricat<strong>in</strong>g oil. Brand<strong>in</strong>g was also very well done <strong>in</strong><br />

lubricat<strong>in</strong>g oil. Market analysis and research will be essential <strong>in</strong> the near future to<br />

compete with other companies by way of optimiz<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ventory and <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

movement. Sales promotion through <strong>in</strong>creased flexibility of products will be<br />

essential to reta<strong>in</strong> customers. Increas<strong>in</strong>g flexibility <strong>in</strong> product specification is<br />

brand<strong>in</strong>g of petroleum products. That is why ref<strong>in</strong>eries must be equipped to stock<br />

streams <strong>in</strong>stead of blended products. Blended products reduce flexibility <strong>in</strong><br />

address<strong>in</strong>g customer demand. Dealers <strong>in</strong> different locations <strong>in</strong> the country will<br />

demand diesel or petrol of different specification to satisfy their customers to<br />

perform better. So Market<strong>in</strong>g and sales will play an important role <strong>in</strong> the years to<br />

come.<br />

5.3.2 Information Flow<br />

Information is not considered as a major supply cha<strong>in</strong> driver because it<br />

does not have a physical presence <strong>in</strong> the company. Information affects all parts of<br />

the supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> many ways. Information serves, as the connection between<br />

the supply cha<strong>in</strong>'s various stages, allow<strong>in</strong>g them to co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate their actions and<br />

br<strong>in</strong>gs about many of the benefits of maximiz<strong>in</strong>g total supply cha<strong>in</strong> efficiency.<br />

Information is also crucial to the daily operations of each stage <strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> considerations for <strong>in</strong>formation flow are for plann<strong>in</strong>g, for operations,<br />

and for management control.<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation occurs when all the different stages of a supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> works towards the objective of maximiz<strong>in</strong>g total supply cha<strong>in</strong> profitability<br />

rather than each stage devot<strong>in</strong>g itself to its own profitability. Lack of co­<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ation can result <strong>in</strong> a significant loss of supply cha<strong>in</strong> profit. Managers must<br />

decide how to create this co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> and what <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

must be shared <strong>in</strong> order to accomplish this goal. Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation between different<br />

stages <strong>in</strong> a supply cha<strong>in</strong> requires each stage to share appropriate <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

150


5.3.2.1 Information flow for forecast<strong>in</strong>g and plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g is the art and science of mak<strong>in</strong>g projections about what future<br />

needs and conditions will be. Obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forecast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation frequently<br />

means us<strong>in</strong>g sophisticated techniques to estimate future demand or market<br />

condition. Managers must decide how they will make forecasts and to what<br />

extent they will rely on them to make decisions. Ref<strong>in</strong>eries often use forecasts<br />

both on a tactical level to schedule production and on strategic level to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

capacity. Once a ref<strong>in</strong>ery creates a forecast, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery needs a plan to act on<br />

this forecast. Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g transforms forecasts <strong>in</strong>to plans of activity to<br />

satisfy the projected demand. A key decision-maker faces the problem of how to<br />

use strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g both at the stage of manager's stage <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

andthroughout the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery forecast<strong>in</strong>g is ma<strong>in</strong>ly for product demand and crude oil<br />

availability and techniques used for forecast<strong>in</strong>g is discussed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Chapter<br />

4. Information required for forecast<strong>in</strong>g crude oil price and availability is available<br />

on services like Reuters net connection. Full details of crude oil and price are<br />

available <strong>in</strong> the published data. This <strong>in</strong>formation is available to subscribers only.<br />

On the basis of this <strong>in</strong>formation a ref<strong>in</strong>ery can decide up on purchase.<br />

In the APM time demand was projected by Gol and was made available to<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g companies like IOCand ref<strong>in</strong>eries like KRL <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g as<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> chapter 4. In post APM the demand projection can be the same but<br />

the market share of each company will not be the same. Market<strong>in</strong>g rights were<br />

restricted to a few companies <strong>in</strong> the APM time. But <strong>in</strong> the post APM market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rights are not restricted. Companies like RIL will appear <strong>in</strong> the market with great<br />

power. So, each market<strong>in</strong>g company must do separate demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Even<br />

stand alone ref<strong>in</strong>eries (ref<strong>in</strong>eries without market<strong>in</strong>g setup) will have to do their<br />

own demand forecast because their market<strong>in</strong>g companies demand fluctuation<br />

will affectthe product hold<strong>in</strong>g of the company.<br />

152


Crude price<br />

Demand for products<br />

Crude availability<br />

Figure 5.6 Information flowfor forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

--+ Decision on buy and sell<br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

f--+<br />

--+ When? What?<br />

How much? Where?<br />

--+<br />

As given <strong>in</strong> the Figure 5.6 the major <strong>in</strong>puts are from crude oil markets and<br />

product market. Output of forecast<strong>in</strong>g willbe decision on when, where, what, and<br />

howmuch crude oil must be and products must be moved <strong>in</strong> the market.<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g needs more <strong>in</strong>put than forecast<strong>in</strong>g. Plann<strong>in</strong>g based on the <strong>in</strong>puts<br />

from government policy, output of forecast<strong>in</strong>g and availability of facility <strong>in</strong> the<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery takes place at different stages. Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

APM was national level (OEB). Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery target was given for the year<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g on the capacity of ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Based on OEB suggestions, a monthly plan<br />

was drawn <strong>in</strong> SPM. Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery has to make there own production plann<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

each day. Everyday, a production meet<strong>in</strong>g will be held to analyze the previous<br />

day'sperformance and make plan for the day. Information on condition of facility<br />

like distillation units, availability of tanks, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance schedule etc. must be<br />

available for plann<strong>in</strong>g the day's production. The demand for products also must<br />

be available for decid<strong>in</strong>g on production. Government policy will be <strong>in</strong>timated <strong>in</strong><br />

monthly plan and daily production must be tuned to government policies.<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g decision must directly reach the operations department for schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

operations. Market<strong>in</strong>g effort must be there to m<strong>in</strong>imize the value added<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory. This will necessitate transport plann<strong>in</strong>g. In short daily plann<strong>in</strong>g will<br />

trigger and direct the activities of operations department, market<strong>in</strong>g department,<br />

and stock oil department. In post APM scenario the plann<strong>in</strong>g will be more<br />

difficult because the demand for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products may vary frequently. The<br />

market also need not be same and product quality demand also may change. So<br />

computerized <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation flow may be needed to have better and<br />

accurate plann<strong>in</strong>g so that the efficiency of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery can be improved to<br />

competewith other ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the near by region.<br />

153


5.3.2.2 Information flow for operations<br />

Decision is taken <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g and second stage decision is<br />

taken <strong>in</strong> the department but to implement those decisions, it must be converted<br />

to <strong>in</strong>formation. Right <strong>in</strong>formation must reach the right place to have right course<br />

ofaction. In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery the specification of products are com<strong>in</strong>g from laboratory<br />

and the operations are controlled accord<strong>in</strong>gly. Product patterns are controlled by<br />

process department. Availability of tanks and pipel<strong>in</strong>es are arranged by the stock<br />

and oil department. Products movement is controlled by market<strong>in</strong>g or sales<br />

department if the company is controll<strong>in</strong>g market<strong>in</strong>g. Ifthe ref<strong>in</strong>ery is stand-alone<br />

type, the product movement is controlled by market<strong>in</strong>g company. Integration of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation is essential to have better comb<strong>in</strong>ed performance of all departments.<br />

Datamust be fed to the computer at the source of generation itself and it must be<br />

available at all the places where it is needed. For example, specification of sample<br />

taken from product l<strong>in</strong>e must be made available on computer and blend<strong>in</strong>g steps<br />

for mak<strong>in</strong>g the product <strong>in</strong>to required specification also must be available on the<br />

computer. So the implementation can be faster and data is generated for f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

specification. Information about the quality quantity <strong>in</strong> that tank is available to<br />

allconcerned departments like sales, stock and oil ,and production.<br />

5.3.2.3 Information flow for control<br />

Controll<strong>in</strong>g is a cont<strong>in</strong>uous process of measur<strong>in</strong>g actual results and<br />

compar<strong>in</strong>g with plant results and f<strong>in</strong>d out deviation to take corrective actions.<br />

Major elements of control are (i) Chart out standard of performance (H)<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g the present performance (Hi) compar<strong>in</strong>g the performance with<br />

standard performance and (iv) tak<strong>in</strong>g corrective steps if deviation is noticed.<br />

In ref<strong>in</strong>ery the performance is normally, measured <strong>in</strong> capacity utilization.<br />

In APM period government used to give <strong>in</strong>centive for production of more than<br />

100 % of <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity. Every month the performance can be planned to<br />

match with annual plann<strong>in</strong>g or even weekly plann<strong>in</strong>g can be done. Weekly and<br />

monthly performance can be measured by calculat<strong>in</strong>g cumulative daily<br />

154


performance. At the end of every month the crude oil ref<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> MMT can be<br />

calculated. These values can be easily compared with the planned ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g per<br />

month and if it is less than the planned, corrective action can be taken to<br />

compensate the lost production.<br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Government policy<br />

Infrastructure facility<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 5.7 Information flow for plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Operation<br />

Transport<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The controll<strong>in</strong>g can be done well with a structured <strong>in</strong>formation flow. Daily<br />

production Figures must be entered <strong>in</strong> to the computer from the process<br />

department itself. This data can be used for remedial steps by OEC when they<br />

plan for the next month. Essential qualities of a control system are flexibility,<br />

prompt report<strong>in</strong>g, understandability, and economic feasibility. Control system<br />

must be flexible to have same performance level when plan changes. The reports<br />

must be available to the central <strong>in</strong>formation bank so that all concerned<br />

departments can retrieve the data fort check<strong>in</strong>g with plan and suggestions for<br />

correction if deviation is there.<br />

Input Process<br />

Control<br />

Figure 5.8 Control system<br />

Figure 5.8 shows a flow diagram of <strong>in</strong>formation flow for control. A well<br />

designed control system will help for better performance <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery because<br />

small changes will affect he quality of out put of the product. Small changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />

distillation unit parameters will change the yield pattern and will affect the profit<br />

of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Controll<strong>in</strong>g all the departments <strong>in</strong> tune with the strategic plan of<br />

the ref<strong>in</strong>ery need good quality <strong>in</strong>formation flowsystem.<br />

155


5.3.3 Account<strong>in</strong>g Information System (AIS) for the <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Important decisions <strong>in</strong> the AIS are (1) How to organize the account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

records <strong>in</strong> an organization to retrieve the data at appropriate place (2) How to<br />

design set proceed<strong>in</strong>gs to meet management and Government requirements (3)<br />

Value change management, gives stages of value addition tak<strong>in</strong>g place to the<br />

products while transform<strong>in</strong>g from the raw material to f<strong>in</strong>ished product. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

out correct answer to these questions is the prime objective of AlS. Divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> to<br />

subsystems is essential for gett<strong>in</strong>g better solution to the problem.<br />

5.3.3.1 Basic subsystems<br />

• Expenditure cycle: <strong>in</strong>volves activities of buy<strong>in</strong>g and pay<strong>in</strong>g for goods or<br />

services, payment by organization<br />

• Production cycle: <strong>in</strong>volves activities of convert<strong>in</strong>g raw material and<br />

labour <strong>in</strong> to f<strong>in</strong>ished goods.<br />

• Human resource or payroll cycle: <strong>in</strong>clude activities of hir<strong>in</strong>g and pay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

employees.<br />

• Revenue cycle: <strong>in</strong>volves activities of sell<strong>in</strong>g goods or services and<br />

collect<strong>in</strong>g payment.<br />

• F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g cycle: <strong>in</strong>volves activities for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g necessary funds for<br />

runn<strong>in</strong>g the organization; repay creditors and distribute profit to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestors.<br />

Figure 5.9 Ledger report<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

Expenditure cycle<br />

General ledger and report<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

<strong>Management</strong> of cash flow is very critical <strong>in</strong> profit mak<strong>in</strong>g because the<br />

amount <strong>in</strong>volved is very high. Logistics normally does not <strong>in</strong>clude the fund<br />

156


management <strong>in</strong> its prime activity. In supply cha<strong>in</strong> management cash flow is also<br />

given equal importance for performance improvement. To improve the speed of<br />

movement of material, the payment of cash also must efficient. In <strong>Indian</strong> contest<br />

payment system has a lot of weaknesses. Even the bank<strong>in</strong>g system is not<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational standard, especiallycheck deal<strong>in</strong>gs. So special case<br />

and attention is needed <strong>in</strong> the area of cash flow. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess objectives of good cash<br />

flow system are<br />

• Efficient account<strong>in</strong>g system to support bus<strong>in</strong>ess processes<br />

• Provide <strong>in</strong>put for effective control of cost.<br />

• Effective use of funds available.<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> functional requirement of a good <strong>in</strong>formation flow system IS<br />

discussed<strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />

5.3.3.1 General ledger account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

It must provide a comprehensive picture of external account<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

accounts. It must automatically post all sub-ledger items <strong>in</strong> the appropriate<br />

general ledger accounts (reconciliation accounts) It must facilitate<br />

simultaneously updat<strong>in</strong>g of general ledger and cost account<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

(figure 5.9). It must also support real - time evaluation of reports on current<br />

account<strong>in</strong>g data, <strong>in</strong> the form of account displays f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements with<br />

different balance sheet versions and additional analysis. The cash flow system<br />

must support <strong>in</strong>tegration with different taxes. Major stakes are sales taxes, excise<br />

duty, provident fund of employees, customs charges for import of crude oil and<br />

port charges for us<strong>in</strong>g the facilities at port.<br />

5.3.3.2 Accounts payable<br />

Accounts payable must record and adm<strong>in</strong>ister account<strong>in</strong>g data from<br />

supplier. It must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated with purchas<strong>in</strong>g. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g not only <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

crude oil and shipp<strong>in</strong>g but also chemical, spare parts ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and other<br />

utilities. All the deliveries and <strong>in</strong>voices must recorded based on each supplier.<br />

These data must give <strong>in</strong>put for cash management and must support various k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

157


of other payments like freight. Present procedure for data entries and check<strong>in</strong>g<br />

aregiven <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.10.<br />

Data are drawn from three different departments for match<strong>in</strong>g. Goods<br />

receipt data is taken from the stores warehouse department, purchase order data<br />

is taken from materials department and <strong>in</strong>voice data is taken from accounts<br />

department. Based on the quantity accepted from warehouse and other factors<br />

from purchase order data the cash to be paid is worked out. This amount is<br />

matched with the bill amount <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>voice. Three-way bill match<strong>in</strong>g not required <strong>in</strong><br />

an efficient cash flow system. Two ways - bill match<strong>in</strong>g is enough for a<br />

computerized system. Efficiency of the system will improve by two way bill<br />

match<strong>in</strong>g. Figure 5.10 shows it.<br />

From m . department<br />

Purchase order<br />

data<br />

Check<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure. 5.10 Three way bill match<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />

From stores department<br />

Mat h<strong>in</strong>g<br />

From accounts<br />

Invoice data<br />

Two way bill match<strong>in</strong>g works on the basic assumption of hav<strong>in</strong>g high level<br />

ofaccuracy <strong>in</strong> warehouse data and purchase order data (figure 5.U). It avoids the<br />

non-value add<strong>in</strong>g activity of <strong>in</strong>voice registration. The bills can be passed on the<br />

basis of <strong>in</strong>puts from purchase order and goods receipt<br />

5.3.3.3 Accounts receivable<br />

Accounts receivable must record and adm<strong>in</strong>ister account<strong>in</strong>g data of all<br />

customers. It must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated with sales. All <strong>in</strong> account receivables must be<br />

recorded directly <strong>in</strong> the general ledger (GL). It must provide <strong>in</strong>put directly for<br />

158


credit management. It must support alarm reports on defaulters of payment and<br />

due date list etc.<br />

5.3.3.4 Cost<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Overhead cost controll<strong>in</strong>g enables to plan, control allocates, and monitor<br />

overhead costs. Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the overhead supports specify standards, which<br />

enables to control costs and evaluate <strong>in</strong>ternal activities. All overhead costs must<br />

be assigned to the cost centers where they are <strong>in</strong>curred. At the end of a post<strong>in</strong>g<br />

period, when all allocations have been made, the plan costs must be compared<br />

with the correspond<strong>in</strong>g actual costs on the basis of the operat<strong>in</strong>g rate. Analysis of<br />

the result<strong>in</strong>g target/actual variance can be used for further managerial<br />

account<strong>in</strong>g measures with<strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Figure 5.11 Two-way bill match<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Mismatch<br />

Match<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Cost center account<strong>in</strong>g must be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e where costs <strong>in</strong>cur <strong>in</strong> the<br />

organization. To achieve this, costs must be assigned to such organizational areas<br />

where the costs <strong>in</strong>cur. The record<strong>in</strong>g and assignment of costs not only enables to<br />

carry out cost controll<strong>in</strong>g but also provides vital preparation for the subsequent<br />

areas of cost account<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

5.3.3.5 Treasury<br />

Treasury must support cash management, cash budget management and<br />

treasury management. Cash management must support:<br />

• Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g optimumamount ofliquidityto meet required payments asthey<br />

become due.<br />

159


• Monitor<strong>in</strong>g cash <strong>in</strong>flows and outflows<br />

It must support various types of <strong>in</strong>puts and cheques. This also must<br />

facilitate <strong>in</strong>formation on status of the cash and liquidity forecast. Cash<br />

management must take care of short term cash management where medium and<br />

longterm liquidity management must be supported by cash budget management.<br />

Treasury management must support<br />

• <strong>Management</strong> off<strong>in</strong>ancial transactions and positions.<br />

• Toprovide flexibility <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g off<strong>in</strong>ancial transactions & positions.<br />

All the transactions must be closely monitored for the efficient<br />

performance of a supply cha<strong>in</strong> management.<br />

5.4 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Efficiency Improvement Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Information Technology<br />

Information technology adds quality and speed to the decision mak<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

it is true <strong>in</strong> the case of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management also.<br />

5.4.1 Introduction<br />

Logistics and supply cha<strong>in</strong> management (SCM) has been <strong>in</strong>fluenced by<br />

developments <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation technology (IT) and computer systems. The<br />

allocation decision of products to various outlets can be carried out centrally.<br />

Capture of relevant data, their transmission to the central decision-maker and the<br />

ability to manipulate them and communicate the decisions to all different<br />

departments, <strong>in</strong> time for the decision to be effective, is now possible. It is now<br />

realistically possible to plan with shorter plann<strong>in</strong>g horizons. Ref<strong>in</strong>eries can plan<br />

their operation on daily basis us<strong>in</strong>g it (figure 5.12). The two major reasons for the<br />

use of IT <strong>in</strong> SCM are the spatial spread of production and service activities and<br />

the time element <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g, both of which require data <strong>in</strong>tensive decision<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g. To make such decision mak<strong>in</strong>g possible, there has to be efficient, reliable<br />

and timely data capture, data availability at various locations, and the ease with<br />

which it can be manipulated for the purpose decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

160


5.4.2 Segmentation of Information Technology<br />

Information technology can be segmented <strong>in</strong> three dimensions. They are<br />

scope of application, functionality and stage of technological development. Each<br />

ofthese would further have the hardware and software aspects of technology.<br />

5.4.2.1 Scope of Application<br />

Based on the managerial scope of application, IT applications can be<br />

classified as Transaction Process<strong>in</strong>g System (TPS), <strong>Management</strong> Information<br />

System (MIS), and Decision Support System (DSS)<br />

• A TPS deals with <strong>in</strong>dividual transaction and <strong>in</strong>teractions between different<br />

entities <strong>in</strong> a managerial system and is governed by simple logical rules of<br />

operations. The ma<strong>in</strong> role of a TPS is to ensure reliable <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

exchange and reduce the time of response, as compared to a manual<br />

system for the same purpose. For example the products moved from<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery by pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship, rail or road on a particular day could be traced<br />

easily <strong>in</strong> a computerized system whereas <strong>in</strong> manual system records must<br />

be exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Data must be generated at the po<strong>in</strong>t of delivery for better<br />

and faster <strong>in</strong>formation at any time.<br />

• A MIS goes one level further and provides <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> various ways to<br />

managers at different levels. For example demand for each product <strong>in</strong> a<br />

particular month or area wise sales Figures of products like diesel, petrol,<br />

lubricat<strong>in</strong>g oil etc.<br />

• A DSS has the provision for decision models <strong>in</strong> the relevant doma<strong>in</strong>s. A<br />

DSS will help to take decisions after consider<strong>in</strong>g the constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Options<br />

will be given by the system. For example number of ships for br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crude oil to a port for a month can be decided with the help of a DSS. This<br />

problem has already been discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4.<br />

162


5.4.2.2 Functionality<br />

functionality<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g major categories can be identified from the po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />

Data Capture, Display, and Organization. This is the basic function<br />

of collection and monitor<strong>in</strong>g the data and <strong>in</strong>formation to do with logistics and<br />

SCM. Data Collection <strong>in</strong>cludes record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventory, production, resource<br />

availability (eg. Tank availability), etc. us<strong>in</strong>g a variety manual and automated<br />

technologies. Data display is ideally <strong>in</strong> graphical form or formats that are close to<br />

what managers f<strong>in</strong>d convenient, such asTables. Data organization is achieved<br />

through a database management system and is briefly discussed <strong>in</strong> section 5.5.4.<br />

In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery all the open<strong>in</strong>g are done at different levels. Figure 5.11 desires<br />

the capture and transform and utilization of data. The most import and data<br />

generation po<strong>in</strong>ts are process department, stock and oil, Delivery po<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

accounts sections. These generated data are used is by many other departments<br />

as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.11.<br />

Communication. An essential feature of SCM is that data is made<br />

available across spatially dispersed decision- mak<strong>in</strong>g units. Communication of<br />

data across distances is now possible through a variety of technologies.<br />

163


Competitive advantage <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> management is ga<strong>in</strong>ed not simply<br />

through faster and cheaper communication of data. Ready access to transactional<br />

data does not automatically lead to better decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

To effectively apply IT to manage its supply cha<strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery must<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish between the form and function of transactional IT and Analytical IT.<br />

Transactional IT is concerned with acquir<strong>in</strong>g, process<strong>in</strong>g and communicat<strong>in</strong>g raw<br />

data about the company's past and current supply cha<strong>in</strong> operations, and with the<br />

compilation and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of reports summariz<strong>in</strong>g these data, typical<br />

examples are general ledger systems, quarterly sales reports, and Enterprise<br />

Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g (ERP) systems.<br />

Process<strong>in</strong>g. Analytical IT evaluates supply cha<strong>in</strong> decisions based on<br />

models developed from supply cha<strong>in</strong> decision databases, which are largely, but<br />

wholly derived from the company's transactional database, plus model<strong>in</strong>g<br />

systems and communication networks l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g corporate databases to the decision<br />

databases. It is concerned with analyz<strong>in</strong>g decisions short, medium, and long­<br />

term. Typical example is model<strong>in</strong>g for selection of crude oil form the world<br />

market or beat<strong>in</strong>g a new distribution center.<br />

5.4.3 E-supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

The need for speed IT professionals place a high premium on speed when<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g the value of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> solutions. How important is<br />

quicker access to supplies and buyers as a feature of web-based <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong>. 31% claims speed is extremely important. 26% says moderately<br />

important. 24% comments that speed is neither important nor not important.<br />

11% of professionals feel speed is slightly important and 8% feels it is not at all<br />

important. To have the desired speed of <strong>in</strong>formation E-supply cha<strong>in</strong> will help.<br />

Provid<strong>in</strong>g the right amount of relevant <strong>in</strong>formation to those who need to know it,<br />

when they need to know it is, <strong>in</strong> fact, effective SCM from <strong>in</strong>formation po<strong>in</strong>t of<br />

view. The e-supply cha<strong>in</strong> will have customers and suppliers seamlessly l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

together, throughout the world, exchang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation almost <strong>in</strong>stantly. The<br />

velocity of relevant <strong>in</strong>formation flow will be so fast that respond<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

165


<strong>in</strong>evitable changes <strong>in</strong> expected vs. actual customer demand-driven (pull type)<br />

production and support<strong>in</strong>g processes that provide for faster changes <strong>in</strong> the actual<br />

material flowto match demand.<br />

Fast access to relevant supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation can payoffhandsomely <strong>in</strong><br />

lower<strong>in</strong>g costs, less <strong>in</strong>ventory, higher quality decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g and better<br />

customer services. One of the biggest cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs is <strong>in</strong> the overhead activity<br />

associated with lots of paperwork and its <strong>in</strong>herent redundancies. The non-value<br />

added time of manual transaction process<strong>in</strong>g could <strong>in</strong>stead be focused on higher<br />

revenue creation activities without proportional <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> expenses. The result<br />

<strong>in</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>ventories, better decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g quality, reduced overhead costs,<br />

among other benefits makes e-supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong> a highly desirable<br />

strategy.<br />

5.4.3.1 Develop<strong>in</strong>g an e-supply strategy<br />

E-supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>Management</strong> significantly changes the way <strong>in</strong> which<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess does bus<strong>in</strong>ess. As a result, management needs to change and serve<br />

markets. Methods used so far are not sufficient, especially companies seek<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease market share. As more and more companies evolve new supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

models, management is compelled to take the right actions or risk be<strong>in</strong>g left<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d.<br />

Just apply<strong>in</strong>g more software at the problem is not the right answer to the<br />

core issues of SCM. Although software is needed, it is very necessary to def<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

process of <strong>in</strong>formation flow that will activate material flow at the right time.<br />

Lessons learned by early adopters of new technologies is that overzealous<br />

adoption of those technologies without a carefully planned strategy can prove<br />

verycostly, especially when the strategy is missed or not def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the first place.<br />

5.4.4 Technology Development Stages<br />

IT developments <strong>in</strong> companies have evolved overtime through the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g stages. These reflect an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trend towards meet<strong>in</strong>g the goal of<br />

166


supply cha<strong>in</strong> management, despite several practical difficulties <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g<br />

thechanges smoothly.<br />

• Sub optimization: This is optimiz<strong>in</strong>g the operations of each department.<br />

Typical example is select<strong>in</strong>g the purchase of crude consider<strong>in</strong>g all constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a mathematical model. Selection will be the best but it will not be<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g the market demand predictions. So the selected crude oil need<br />

not give products, which are high <strong>in</strong> demand. This is commonly used <strong>in</strong><br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />

• Organization level and <strong>in</strong>ter organization-<strong>in</strong>tegrated systems.<br />

This is the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> organization level. The systems developed are<br />

Electronic data Interchange (EDI) manufactur<strong>in</strong>g recourse Plann<strong>in</strong>g (MRP),<br />

distribution Recourse Plann<strong>in</strong>g (DRP)and ERP<br />

• Integrated Systems.<br />

Total <strong>in</strong>tegration of the organization is the feature. Customer to supplier is<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated through network<strong>in</strong>g. Computational speed will be match<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

operational decision - Mak<strong>in</strong>g requirements.<br />

5.4.5 Hardware Network<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The Hardware aspect of IT systems are described below. The mam<br />

hardware systems which supports IT are Internet, Extranet, Intranet, and VSAT<br />

Intranet: This is used to communicate with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. Access to data<br />

collected is not open to all with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry also. It can be made available through<br />

network<strong>in</strong>g of computers <strong>in</strong> each department. Authenticity of data is very high<br />

and shar<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>formation is good, decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g becomes very fast. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />

Advantage of <strong>in</strong>tranet is less documentation and its storage. Paperless offices can<br />

be made us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tranet. Privacyof data is very well ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

• Extranet: Connection between different offices <strong>in</strong> different locations can be<br />

atta<strong>in</strong>ed through extranet. Privacy of data is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. Access is limited to<br />

permitted users.<br />

167


monitored.<br />

Depots can be connected usmg and the product movement will be<br />

• Internet: Information can be passed to anybody at any place <strong>in</strong> the world. Ma<strong>in</strong><br />

disadvantage is privacy. Privacy is very limited <strong>in</strong> Internet but the reach is very<br />

good. Information, which does not require mush privacy can be, used the mode of<br />

communication. Sales Figures or balance sheet of the company can be<br />

communicated through Internet.<br />

• VSAT: This is onl<strong>in</strong>e communication. All the data generated will be<br />

communicated to the host system. Sell<strong>in</strong>g fuel at an outlet can be communicated<br />

to the ref<strong>in</strong>ery at the time of dispens<strong>in</strong>g itself. It captures data at the source and<br />

transmitted through a satellite transmitter. The receiver at ref<strong>in</strong>ery will receive<br />

the communication <strong>in</strong>stantaneously. At any po<strong>in</strong>t of time the total sale of any<br />

product like petrol can be seen directly. Production plann<strong>in</strong>g and products<br />

movement can be controlled <strong>in</strong> a better way.<br />

5.4.6 Integrated systems.<br />

The full force of supply cha<strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g enabled by developments <strong>in</strong> IT<br />

emerges <strong>in</strong> the area of <strong>in</strong>tegrated systems. These are hardware and software<br />

elements. They permit analysis and decision- mak<strong>in</strong>g across functions and<br />

narrowly def<strong>in</strong>ed entities. Some of the important developments <strong>in</strong> these are<br />

discussedbelow.<br />

5.4.6.1 Geographical <strong>in</strong>formation Systems (GIS)<br />

A technology that is suitable for use for management of logistics and SCM<br />

<strong>in</strong> spatially widespread operations is GIS. The technology captures the spatial<br />

characteristics of data and is typically map based. Data can be conveniently<br />

represented as attributes with po<strong>in</strong>ters to specific geographical areas through an<br />

appropriate database. Both location wise and area wise representation of data is<br />

possible. For logistics & SCM applications, the spatial <strong>in</strong>formation ofthe database<br />

is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by digitiz<strong>in</strong>g maps. This visual <strong>in</strong>terface provided by such software is<br />

very powerful and allows a good level of <strong>in</strong>terface decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g by the user<br />

directly. It also permits the use of decision models built upon the basic GIS. This<br />

168


enables decisions like market segmentation, location decisions, allocation<br />

decisions and rout<strong>in</strong>g decisions.<br />

5.4.6.2 Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)<br />

The spatial aspect of manag<strong>in</strong>g distribution and procurement systems can<br />

now be managed us<strong>in</strong>g EDI. This is a system highly structured message<br />

communication with tight pre decided formats of documents, which allows<br />

computers <strong>in</strong> different locations to communicate effectively with speed and<br />

reliability. There is a service provider through whom this transfer of data takes<br />

place, who provides translators between different formats and handles the EDI<br />

traffic between various sources and dest<strong>in</strong>ations. The uses of EDI requires<br />

adherence to certa<strong>in</strong> standards. In addition to the hardware and software that a<br />

firm may have, EDI requires specific software that allows conversion from any<br />

application to an application free format.<br />

5.4.6.3 MRP -11 and DPR<br />

High level of plann<strong>in</strong>g which <strong>in</strong>cludes capacity plann<strong>in</strong>g, some feedback <strong>in</strong><br />

the plann<strong>in</strong>g based on <strong>in</strong>dividual process constra<strong>in</strong>ts and provid<strong>in</strong>g provision for<br />

some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, both <strong>in</strong>ternal and external is made possible under the<br />

framework of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g resources plann<strong>in</strong>g (MRP-II)<br />

On similar l<strong>in</strong>es, Distribution Resources Plann<strong>in</strong>g(DRP) software attempts<br />

to synchronize the dispatch of multiple products to multiple locations based on<br />

orders placed.<br />

5.4.6.4 Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g (ERP)<br />

ERP systems are operational IT systems that gather <strong>in</strong>formation from<br />

across all of a company's functions, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the entire enterprise hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

broader scope. ERP systems monitor material, order schedules, f<strong>in</strong>ished products<br />

and other <strong>in</strong>formation through out the organization, ERP systems help to make<br />

better supply cha<strong>in</strong> decisions.<br />

169


ERP systems are good at monitor<strong>in</strong>g transactions out generally lack the<br />

analyticalcapability to determ<strong>in</strong>e what transactions ought to happen. They reside<br />

more <strong>in</strong> the operational area <strong>in</strong> the IT map than <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g or strategic<br />

areas. ERP system track orders through the entire company from procurement to<br />

delivery. Today's trend of us<strong>in</strong>g a product based <strong>in</strong>stead of a function - based<br />

organizational structure has also helped make ERP systems more alternative<br />

because this structure <strong>in</strong>creases the importance of the cross- functional scope<br />

that ERP systems provide.<br />

ERP systems not only allow a company to track items through out the<br />

system, they also allow a company to automate processes. By automat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

processes, companies are often able to <strong>in</strong>crease efficiency and reduce errors. It is<br />

also important that automat<strong>in</strong>g poor processes only guarantee that they will be<br />

executed poorly each time. So companies would review their processes before<br />

implement<strong>in</strong>g ERP systems.<br />

5.4.6.5 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> (SCM)<br />

SCM systems are a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of many of the preced<strong>in</strong>g applications and<br />

are used to span the stages <strong>in</strong> the supply cha<strong>in</strong>. SCM systems allow for a more<br />

global scope because they can span many supply cha<strong>in</strong> stages with their different<br />

modules. SCM systems have the analytical capabilities to produce plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

solutions and strategic level decisions. They do not usually span all of the supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> stages, they rely on ERP systems to provide the <strong>in</strong>formation necessary to<br />

perform the analysis. SCM systems currently provide the highest level of<br />

functionality with respect to the vertical axis of the IT map.<br />

Two features of SCM products are noteworthy. First the back end <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

a number of analytical techniques based on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of optimization. The<br />

front end of SCM products provide more <strong>in</strong>terfaces for model formulation and<br />

validationby users.<br />

170


5.4.7 SCM Software<br />

SCMsoftware is described as "Effectivesupply cha<strong>in</strong> management enables<br />

you to make <strong>in</strong>formed decisions along the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong> from acquir<strong>in</strong>g raw<br />

materials to manufactur<strong>in</strong>g products to distribut<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ished goods to the<br />

customer". ERP systems provide a great deal of plann<strong>in</strong>g capabilities the various<br />

materials, capacity and demand constra<strong>in</strong>ts are all considered separately <strong>in</strong><br />

relative isolation of each other. The more lead<strong>in</strong>g edge SCM products are able to<br />

consider all the relevant <strong>in</strong>formation simultaneously and to perform real time<br />

simulations of adjustments with<strong>in</strong> the constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Real time <strong>in</strong>formation through<br />

out the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong> is needed to make correct decisions and SCM<br />

products are designed to gather that real time <strong>in</strong>formation. Traditional ERP<br />

systems generally do not gather real time <strong>in</strong>formation from everywhere <strong>in</strong> the<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> on the contrary they often conta<strong>in</strong> static, dated <strong>in</strong>formation only<br />

related to subsections of the supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Most SCM products are be<strong>in</strong>g designed with the Internet <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g web front ends for suppliers and customers, and transactions be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sent over the Internet <strong>in</strong>stead of via the more expensive and complicated EDI.<br />

This section will exam<strong>in</strong>e two of the lead<strong>in</strong>g SCM software vendors and four of<br />

the lead<strong>in</strong>g ERP vendors and their SCM products.<br />

• Manugistics<br />

They developed the very first SCM software <strong>in</strong> 1980. They have steadily<br />

been add<strong>in</strong>g new functionality to their SCM products and now have one of the<br />

fullest product l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the SCM market. Manugistics offers products <strong>in</strong> Demand<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Supply</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g schedul<strong>in</strong>g, Transportation<br />

management, supply cha<strong>in</strong> navigator, NETWORKS.<br />

The first four are SCM products, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Navigator is a graphical<br />

SCM model<strong>in</strong>g tool that allows the user to simulate supply cha<strong>in</strong> changes,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cost analysis and to view the current status of all elements <strong>in</strong> the supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>. Networks are an Internet based supply cha<strong>in</strong> collaboration frameworks.<br />

171


- i2<br />

ia is formed to implement software from mathematical methods of supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> optimisation. iz has a product l<strong>in</strong>e similar to management. It <strong>in</strong>cludes:<br />

Demand plann<strong>in</strong>g, Distribution plann<strong>in</strong>g, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Transportation plann<strong>in</strong>g, Advanced schedul<strong>in</strong>g, Order promis<strong>in</strong>g and data<br />

Integration<br />

-Baan<br />

Company started <strong>in</strong> 1978 <strong>in</strong> Netherland. The first version of Bann's next<br />

genaration. MRP software was released <strong>in</strong> 1987.In 1998, Baan created a separate<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess named baan supply cha<strong>in</strong> solution (Baan SCS) to develop, implement<br />

and support their new suite of supply cha<strong>in</strong> products. Their SCM products are<br />

tightly <strong>in</strong>tegrated with Baan ERP. Products <strong>in</strong>clude Baan SCS planner, Baan SCS<br />

Demand planner, Baan SCS Scheduler, Baan SCS execution.<br />

-SAP<br />

SAP was founded <strong>in</strong> Germany <strong>in</strong> 1972 by four former IBM employees.<br />

Unlike many of its competitors, SAP has adopted a build your own philosophy<br />

when add<strong>in</strong>g functionality to its ERP product suite. This is true for its ERP<br />

product suite. This is true for its SCM products also. Product l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>clude supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> cockpit, Available to promise (ATP), Advanced plann<strong>in</strong>g & schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

CAPS) and forecast<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

- People Soft<br />

People soft was founded <strong>in</strong> 1987, released their first Human Resource<br />

<strong>Management</strong> System (HRMS) software package <strong>in</strong> 1988. They started offer<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g module <strong>in</strong> 1996. The SCM product l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>cludes Enterprise<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g, product plann<strong>in</strong>g and order promis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

172


• Oracle<br />

Oracle corporation was formed <strong>in</strong> 1977. The SCM product l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

Materials management, Sales order management, Post sales customer service<br />

and Qualitymanagement.<br />

The most important new feature of the new wave of SCM products must be<br />

the ability to give the end customer a " time to deliver" <strong>in</strong> real time. This is only<br />

possible to do accurately with a comprehensive SCM solutions be<strong>in</strong>g used<br />

through out an organization and its suppliers and customers. This ability will be<br />

the result of all the separate pieces of <strong>in</strong>formation be<strong>in</strong>g available, such as current<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g capacity, parts availability, <strong>in</strong>ventory levels at all locations,<br />

distribution capabilities and current and forecast product demand. This ability<br />

has been described by many experienced manufactur<strong>in</strong>g manager as truly<br />

revolutionary, process<strong>in</strong>g a strong SCM system is quickly becom<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

requirement for competitive success <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />

5.5 Application of SCM Software <strong>in</strong> a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

Real time <strong>in</strong>formation throughout the entire supply cha<strong>in</strong> is need to make<br />

correct decisions and SCM products must be designed to gather that real time<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation. The procedure required by a ref<strong>in</strong>ery to develop an efficient SCM<br />

system is discussed <strong>in</strong> this section.<br />

5.5.1 Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g design of logistic <strong>in</strong>formation system<br />

Logistic <strong>in</strong>formation system be<strong>in</strong>g very complex the design must<br />

consider a lot of parameters. Organization culture also <strong>in</strong>fluences the system<br />

because the changes must be acceptable to the organization.<br />

173


Organization<br />

culture<br />

Physical facilities &<br />

operations<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

environment<br />

III<br />

III<br />

Logistic<br />

<strong>in</strong>formati<br />

on<br />

system<br />

Information technology<br />

Figure 5.14 Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g design of logistics <strong>in</strong>formation system<br />

/<br />

Strategy<br />

Organizational<br />

process plan<br />

Organizational<br />

process<br />

Figure 5.14 represent diagrammatically the relationship with each other<br />

factorwith the <strong>in</strong>formation system.<br />

5.5.2 Proposed Design of SCM <strong>in</strong>formation System for a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

Total <strong>in</strong>formation flow can be divided <strong>in</strong> small modules for detailed<br />

analysis. Then these modules can be <strong>in</strong>tegrated to get the fully <strong>in</strong>tegrated model<br />

of<strong>in</strong>formation system.<br />

5.5.2.1 Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g module<br />

Annual plann<strong>in</strong>g module gives <strong>in</strong>formation on ma<strong>in</strong>tenance schedule,<br />

quantity of crude oil which is selected for purchase, and the expected net back<br />

from the process<strong>in</strong>g of total crude oil. Crude price used for calculation is the<br />

landed price at ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Constra<strong>in</strong>ts like availabilty, distance,et. are used for the<br />

selectionof crude oil.<br />

174


Quantity and type of crude to be processed next is the output of the<br />

module. The operations to be performed for gett<strong>in</strong>g the desired results also can<br />

beachievedfrom the module.<br />

5.5.2.6 F<strong>in</strong>ished products tank yard plan and operation module<br />

Product distribution is controlled by the decisions from this module. Type<br />

of transport, quantity, quality, etc. are decided <strong>in</strong> this module. Transaction<br />

Process<strong>in</strong>g System (TPS) will compute the details of transaction.<br />

Information flow must start from the retail outlet. Present practice <strong>in</strong><br />

almost all ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India is on the basis of projected data by Govt. of India.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the production was not enough to meet the demand and competition was<br />

not there, ref<strong>in</strong>eries could manage very well. Due to decontrol of petroleum<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry anybody can import and sell <strong>in</strong> the market. So the <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

generation must be accurate as much as possible to m<strong>in</strong>imize the <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

hold<strong>in</strong>g and maximiz<strong>in</strong>g flexibility of products. Figure 5.12 shows the overhaul<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation flow <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

In the years to come, all the outlets will not be demand<strong>in</strong>g diesel with<br />

same centane number. Requirement for products will change from location to<br />

location. For example <strong>in</strong> Kerala demand for diesel with low flash po<strong>in</strong>t will be<br />

higher <strong>in</strong> the cities. This will reduce fire hazard at the event of accident. Demand<br />

for diesel with high flash po<strong>in</strong>t will be preferred <strong>in</strong> the high ranges of Kerala.<br />

Temperature on the hill top will be low so the start<strong>in</strong>g will be difficult for vehicles<br />

with diesel of low cetane number. This <strong>in</strong>dicates the necessity for an accurate<br />

projection of demand on the basis of the product demand <strong>in</strong> the outlets. Earlier<br />

this was almost impossible to get the real demand at retail outlet. Consumption<br />

at retail outlet can be now collected on daily basis or even hourly basis if a<br />

company desires so. Bill<strong>in</strong>g must be done us<strong>in</strong>g computers. So the sales data is<br />

generated <strong>in</strong> the computer. By an <strong>in</strong>ternet connection these data can be<br />

communicated to the company. All the outlets can communicate their sales<br />

through <strong>in</strong>ternet and the company will get exact demand for each product on<br />

desired time <strong>in</strong>terval. This generated data must be compared with the projected<br />

177


generation po<strong>in</strong>t is sales. Sold products are mov<strong>in</strong>g through pipel<strong>in</strong>e, ship,<br />

railway wagons and trucks. Almost all ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India is hav<strong>in</strong>g automatic<br />

fill<strong>in</strong>g stations. From fill<strong>in</strong>g stations consolidated statements are be<strong>in</strong>g send to<br />

the accounts department either on soft copy or hardcopy. In both the cases some<br />

re-entry is required <strong>in</strong> the computer. This leads delay, errors and unnecessary<br />

labour. Quantity difference is a common compla<strong>in</strong>t and normally this difference<br />

will be adjusted <strong>in</strong> fuel and oil losses. In the case of railway wagon fill<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />

quantity is checked only us<strong>in</strong>g dipsticks. It cannot be cross-checked. By us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

flow-measur<strong>in</strong>g device <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> pipel<strong>in</strong>e the sum of all the measurements can<br />

be checked. In all the outlets there must be automatic flow measur<strong>in</strong>g devices and<br />

the read<strong>in</strong>gs must automatically go to the computer. These computers can be<br />

connected through network if fill<strong>in</strong>g stations are with<strong>in</strong> a reasonable distance.<br />

Internet can be utilized if the distance is more. This data must be used for all<br />

purposes of account<strong>in</strong>g and production. For example sales tax calculation can be<br />

done <strong>in</strong> the accounts department with this data. All departments can know what<br />

is the present product stock <strong>in</strong> the company. Normal practice is stock and oil<br />

department will prepare a report and submit to all concerned departments on the<br />

basisof measurement from each tank.<br />

Another important activity is the receipt of crude oil. This data is also<br />

generated by measur<strong>in</strong>g from the storage tank. This can be measured by<br />

automatic measur<strong>in</strong>g devices <strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e and delivery l<strong>in</strong>e. This fill<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e will<br />

give the quantity pumped from ship to ref<strong>in</strong>ery and delivery l<strong>in</strong>e will give the<br />

quantity of crude oil used for production. Difference between these two will be<br />

the actual storage. These type of actual data will help <strong>in</strong> real time optimization.<br />

Other data generation po<strong>in</strong>ts are also there <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. They are less <strong>in</strong> volume<br />

but critically may be the same for many of the data generated like ma<strong>in</strong>tenance.<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance department is generat<strong>in</strong>g the data related to ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of any<br />

equipment. This data can be used for plann<strong>in</strong>g the availability of each equipment.<br />

The availability is taken from the history of each equipment. Shut down<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance is another data useful for plann<strong>in</strong>g and schedul<strong>in</strong>g. This give details<br />

on equipment history, product produced by it, price of equipment, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

180


work carried out so far, and work orders. A number of equipment, which are<br />

down and its work order also will be <strong>in</strong>itiated by the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance department.<br />

Inventory of chemicals and catalysts is another important <strong>in</strong>formation, which is<br />

to be trucked well to m<strong>in</strong>imize <strong>in</strong>ventory. Production details must be made<br />

availableto the vendors through extranet. Extranet takes case of privacy of data.<br />

Thisdata can be utilized by the vendor to calculate consumption of chemicals and<br />

catalysts. Inventory position also must be made available on the net. So the<br />

vendor can plan his transportation of these items to the company as when<br />

required. This will reduce the <strong>in</strong>ventory hold<strong>in</strong>g. Responsibility of chemicals and<br />

catalysts <strong>in</strong>ventory can be transferred to the vendors. Paper work and monitory<br />

ofthese items can be m<strong>in</strong>imized.<br />

Spares requirement is also generated at the plann<strong>in</strong>g stage of<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. It must give <strong>in</strong>formation on spares <strong>in</strong>ventory, category wise<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory and short supply of critical spares. Plant monitor<strong>in</strong>g is also requir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

database to conduct <strong>in</strong>spection and classification of tanks. A ref<strong>in</strong>ery requires<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on air pollution, ambient air quality, Effluent water quality, power<br />

demand <strong>in</strong> each bus steam vent<strong>in</strong>g, condense dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, statutory compliance<br />

reports on safety, accident free man hours, health level of employees aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

standards and govt. policies and regulations.<br />

Table 5.1 Details of data generated ateach department along with theirma<strong>in</strong> process.<br />

Process Department Data Generation<br />

Primary Processes<br />

Budget Plann<strong>in</strong>g GEC<br />

Crude cost<br />

Products Price<br />

Crude Throughout (GEB TargetvsActual)<br />

Production Today/MTD (GEB Target vs<br />

Actual)<br />

Production Today/MTD/YfD<br />

Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

withGCC<br />

Crude slate<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

GEC<br />

GEC<br />

GCC directives<br />

Expected crude receiptas per GEB Plan<br />

Expected crude receipt as per crude slate<br />

plan<br />

Actual receiptdates and quantities<br />

181


Process Department Data Generation<br />

S&OM Ship wise Ocean loss<br />

Ship wise Ocean loss above norms<br />

Ship wise demurrage loss<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g OEC Production Today /MTD (SPM Target Vs<br />

Actual)<br />

Manage sales<br />

S&OM<br />

Manage<br />

Institutional<br />

S&OM<br />

Products movement today/ MTD (SPM Vs.<br />

Actual)<br />

Products movement - trucks and wagons<br />

Sales<br />

F&A (sales)<br />

Products movement - pipe l<strong>in</strong>e and tankers<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g Discount to customers<br />

Manage Direct<br />

Sales<br />

S&OM<br />

F&A(sales)<br />

Outstand<strong>in</strong>g payments<br />

Products movement today/ MTD (SPM Vs.<br />

Actual)<br />

Operate Plant<br />

Manage<br />

production<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Unit wise daily Net Back<br />

LPG Production<br />

Production units charge<br />

VGO yield (Today / MTD) (Potential Vs.<br />

Actual)<br />

Cl.Oyield<br />

Benzene yield<br />

Toluene yield<br />

Naphtha consumption for DHDS<br />

Hydrogen Production for DHDS<br />

Fuel Consumption - DHDS<br />

HSD/ LSDStock - DHDS<br />

Manage Quality<br />

Lab<br />

Quality giveaway<br />

Offspecs product tanks daily as of<br />

Crude Inventory - No. of days and 7 days<br />

plan Horizon<br />

Pend<strong>in</strong>g payment for crude received<br />

Payment made and crude not received<br />

Manage Inventory<br />

and movement<br />

S&OM<br />

Crude Inventory - not with<strong>in</strong> norm<br />

Product Inventory<br />

Intermediate Inventory<br />

Demurrage Loss<br />

Inventory AgeAnalysis<br />

Days stock of product Inventory<br />

182


Process Department Data Generation<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> Plant<br />

Manage<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

Manage<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

Availability<br />

Unplanned shut Down loss <strong>in</strong> Rs.<br />

Shut down Monitor<strong>in</strong>g (by unit and no. of<br />

hours)<br />

Ag<strong>in</strong>g of down equipment<br />

Inventory of Chemicals and catalysts<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of spares <strong>in</strong>ventory aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

Manage materials Materials norms<br />

Category wise <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

Short supply ofcritical spares<br />

Monitor Plant<br />

Process<br />

Manage process Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Design/<br />

Inspection<br />

Fuel consumption<br />

Oil loss<br />

Daily net back<br />

Fteactortemperature<br />

Conversion Percentage<br />

Hvdrozen Mol Ratio<br />

VGOvield<br />

VFt Viscosity<br />

Preheat Efficiency<br />

Cool<strong>in</strong>g Tower Efficiency<br />

Cool<strong>in</strong>g Water Outlet Temperature<br />

Heater Efficiency Design Vs. Actual<br />

Vis- breaker conversion<br />

Catalyst Loss<br />

Bottom Sediments and water ( BS & W)<br />

Reactor Temperature/ Regenerator<br />

Temperature<br />

Manage<br />

Inspection<br />

Inspection<br />

Boiler certification<br />

Tank certification<br />

Power Consumption<br />

ManageEHS E&E<br />

Water consumption<br />

Steam consumption<br />

Air Pollution - Process Heaters and Boilers<br />

183


Process Department Data Generation<br />

Ambient Air Quality<br />

Effluent Water Quality at ETP and FE<br />

Power Demand <strong>in</strong> each BUS<br />

Steam vent<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Improve Plant<br />

ManageR&D R&D<br />

Manage Projects Projects<br />

Support Processes<br />

Condensate dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Safety<br />

Statutory Compliance Reports<br />

Accident Free Man hours<br />

Health Health Level of Employees aga<strong>in</strong>st Standards<br />

Progress %and pend<strong>in</strong>g Mile Stones<br />

Project variance<br />

Capital Expenditure (Planned/ Non- planned)<br />

Capital jobs - Monthly Status<br />

Revenue Projects - Status<br />

Exception on Projects<br />

Absenteeism %<br />

Human Human Over time Cost %<br />

Resources Resources Statutory Reports Compliance<br />

Over Time Cost<br />

Net Outstand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Interest Cost on work<strong>in</strong>g capital<br />

F&A/Cs F&A/Cs Profitability<br />

Cash Flow<br />

Revenue expenditure - Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Heads<br />

IT C&A System uptime<br />

Legal & Legal<br />

Compliance<br />

Govern<strong>in</strong>g Processes<br />

Govt. Policies and<br />

Regulation<br />

Corporate<br />

Monthly monitor<strong>in</strong>g of MOU<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Capacity Utilization<br />

MoU<br />

Vigilance<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

OEC<br />

Crude Throughout w.r.t SPM<br />

Distillate yield w.r.t SPM<br />

184


• Laboratory <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Process <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Production Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Ref<strong>in</strong>ery schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Material balance<br />

The objective of this layer of <strong>in</strong>formation management is to ascerta<strong>in</strong><br />

operation efficiency. The third layer consists of <strong>in</strong>formation on bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

management. Some of the functional activities for this layer are:<br />

• F<strong>in</strong>ance and accounts<br />

• Materials<br />

• Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

• Projects<br />

• Sales and distribution<br />

• Human resource management<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> objective of <strong>in</strong>formation management at this layer is profit<br />

management. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed functional activities of current layer are named as<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Management</strong> System. Figure 5.12 shows the schematic presentation<br />

system for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery like KRL. Some of the functional activities are <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

more than one layer. For example materials management and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

activities are perform<strong>in</strong>g at both the operation management and bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

management level. Degree of <strong>in</strong>tegration of functions is the success of any<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation system software selected should support both horizontal and vertical<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrate.<br />

5.5.4 Features of a supply cha<strong>in</strong> software<br />

given below:<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> features required for supply cha<strong>in</strong> management software are as<br />

• Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Demand management<br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

186


Operat<strong>in</strong>gmonitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Constra<strong>in</strong>tplann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Enterprise<br />

Distribution plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

In plant<br />

Safety Stockbuffers<br />

Advanced materialmanagement<br />

Detailed schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

• Vendormanaged<strong>in</strong>ventory.<br />

• Transportation<br />

• Real time product consumption<br />

• Physical distribution <strong>in</strong>terface<br />

• Service requirements<br />

• Optimizers<br />

• Integration<br />

These are the ma<strong>in</strong> requirements of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management software.<br />

Integration is the key function <strong>in</strong> the system. There are many software systems<br />

that sub optimizes at different level but the <strong>in</strong>tegration part is weak.<br />

5.6 Conclusion<br />

In a supply cha<strong>in</strong> management system there are three key components.<br />

They are <strong>in</strong>formation flow, material flow, and cash flow. Success of SCM lies <strong>in</strong><br />

the systematic control of all these flows. Standard methods are there for<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g material flow. Better technologies are there for faster <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g and use. Effective bank<strong>in</strong>g systems are there for faster transactions. But<br />

better monitor<strong>in</strong>g and control is required to reap the benefits of seM systems.<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g and control functions performed by logistic managers rely on quickand<br />

accurate relevant data. Build<strong>in</strong>g an Information System for data capture, storage,<br />

and use is the pre requisite of a good modern <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> System<br />

187


The software system must have very good data collection facility from the<br />

source of data as much as possible. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t data entry is the next stage if<br />

direct collection is not possible. Software system model must support all the<br />

functions <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The ma<strong>in</strong> functions <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are process control and<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g, operations management, and bus<strong>in</strong>ess management.<br />

This chapter was devoted to discussion on an <strong>in</strong>tegrated (modular)<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation system model for manag<strong>in</strong>g supply cha<strong>in</strong> activities <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation system model presented focused on logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g and control.<br />

Such a model is necessary to <strong>in</strong>tegrate and implement the different plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

modelsrecommended <strong>in</strong> chapter four.<br />

188


CHAPTER VI<br />

Strategic and Operational SCM Problems<br />

and Some Solutions for a Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

6.1 Introduction<br />

Tools such as simulation are used for improv<strong>in</strong>g performance of logistics<br />

systems <strong>in</strong> the previous chapters. Application of these tools <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery shows its<br />

appropriateness <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery logistics also. For the purpose of study of the logistic<br />

system an important part of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited CKRL) was<br />

selected. Total supply cha<strong>in</strong> was studied from two different perspectives namely<br />

strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g and operations. The discussion on strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g starts<br />

with history of KRL and its work<strong>in</strong>g environment. Strengths, weaknesses,<br />

opportunities and threads of KRL are analysed and difference <strong>in</strong> outlook needed<br />

for competitive advantage <strong>in</strong> post APM liberalized economy are suggested.<br />

Operations <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> are classified <strong>in</strong>to conventional <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and<br />

outbound logistics for the purpose of analysis. These are studied <strong>in</strong> detail to<br />

identify problems and some suggestions for improvement <strong>in</strong> system performance<br />

are also given at each stage.<br />

6.2 Strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

<strong>Management</strong> of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> KRL<br />

The present time is characterized from the follow<strong>in</strong>g important changes <strong>in</strong><br />

the petroleum ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector <strong>in</strong> India. (a) After years of Government control,<br />

decontrol is nearly completely implemented. (b) The sector has been opened for<br />

private ventures Cc) Crude oil prices are firm now after low prices <strong>in</strong> 1998 (d)<br />

Environmental standards are becom<strong>in</strong>g stricter Ce) Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>s are on the<br />

decrease (f) Liberalized trade regimes allow both <strong>in</strong>creased import and export of<br />

petroleum products. (g) New acquisitions, takeovers, and dis<strong>in</strong>vestments are<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>gplace <strong>in</strong> this important sector. The above changes create a need for ref<strong>in</strong>ers<br />

to reformulate their strategy more now than ever before. Plann<strong>in</strong>g at different<br />

189


levels is essential for the success of SCM application <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. A through<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of exist<strong>in</strong>g systems is required for the successful plann<strong>in</strong>g. In the<br />

sections below a brief history of KRL, its current status, and the present logistics<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g practices are discussed. There after SWOT analyses is done and<br />

strategies for improvement are outl<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

6.2.1 Introduction to KRL<br />

Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Limited (KRL) was <strong>in</strong>corporated as a Public Limited<br />

Company <strong>in</strong> September 1963 with technical collaboration and f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

participation from Phillips <strong>Petroleum</strong> Company of USA. The Ref<strong>in</strong>ery was<br />

commissioned <strong>in</strong> 1966. Under APM <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g capacities and throughput was the<br />

best strategy. From the date of commission<strong>in</strong>g to-date, the Ref<strong>in</strong>ery undertook<br />

three expansions <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity and <strong>in</strong>stallation of Secondary Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Facilities. The capacity was first expanded from 2.5 million tons per annum<br />

(MMTPA) to 3.3 MMTPA <strong>in</strong> September 1976. The production of Liquefied<br />

<strong>Petroleum</strong> Gas (LPG) and Aviation Turb<strong>in</strong>e Fuel (ATF) commenced after this<br />

expansion. This was done as a strategy to diversify portfolio of products.<br />

Capacity was further <strong>in</strong>creased to 4.5 MMTPA <strong>in</strong> November 1984 along with the<br />

addition of 1 MMTPA capacity Fluid Catalytic Crack<strong>in</strong>g Unit. Crude process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capacity was further expanded from 4.5 MMTPA to 7.5 MMTPA <strong>in</strong> December<br />

1994. Along with this expansion the capacity of the secondary process<strong>in</strong>g facilities<br />

was enhanced to 1.4MMTPA. This formed part of strategy to anticipate and meet<br />

strict fuel specifications to control pollution. A Fuel Gas De-sulphurisation Unit<br />

was also <strong>in</strong>stalled as part of the expansion project, as an environmental<br />

protection measure to m<strong>in</strong>imize sulfur dioxide emission from the Ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 1989, the Company commissioned Aromatics production<br />

facilities with a design capacity of 87,200 tons per annum (TPA) of Benzene and<br />

12,000 TPA of Toluene, mark<strong>in</strong>g KRL's entry <strong>in</strong>to petrochemicals. This was the<br />

time when petrochemical Industry <strong>in</strong> the country was expand<strong>in</strong>g and KRL<br />

strategy to enter this field was a part of forward <strong>in</strong>tegration A Captive Power<br />

Plant of 26.3 MW was commissioned <strong>in</strong> March 1991 to meet the power<br />

requirements of KRL and to safeguard the operations aga<strong>in</strong>st power supply<br />

fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the State grid. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 1998, an additional Captive Power<br />

190


Plant of 17.8 MW capacity was commissioned mak<strong>in</strong>g KRL self-sufficient <strong>in</strong><br />

power. The above strategies to become self sufficient <strong>in</strong> power requirement at the<br />

right time and was a very good strategy s<strong>in</strong>ce power shortage became regular <strong>in</strong><br />

Kerala soon after this. A Light Ends Feed Preparation Unit (LEFPU) to supply<br />

Polybutenes feedstock to Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Balmer Lawrie Ltd. (CRBL), a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

venture company, was commissioned <strong>in</strong> March 1996. KRL also commissioned a<br />

Raff<strong>in</strong>ate Purification Unit (RPU) for the manufacture of 10,000 TPA of<br />

<strong>Petroleum</strong> Hydrocarbon Solvent <strong>in</strong> January 1994, with the technology developed<br />

by the <strong>in</strong>-house R&D Center. KRL started commercial production of M<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

Turpent<strong>in</strong>e Oil (MTO) <strong>in</strong> March 1995, utiliz<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities of the<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery. KRL started production and market<strong>in</strong>g of Mixed Aromatic Solvent <strong>in</strong><br />

March 1996.<br />

KRL has demonstrated the capability to implement projects with<strong>in</strong><br />

approved cost and time. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade, KRL had undertaken<br />

implementation of the follow<strong>in</strong>g major projects:<br />

A. Aromatics Project (Aromatics)<br />

B. Captive Power Plant (CPP)<br />

C. Capacity Expansion Project (CEP)<br />

All the above Projects were completed with<strong>in</strong> approved cost and ahead of<br />

the targeted completion date. Details of which are given <strong>in</strong> Table 6.1<br />

Table 6.1 Project implementation <strong>in</strong> KRL<br />

Aromatics CPP CEP<br />

Approved Project Cost, Rs. Crores 75.80 67.89 481.24<br />

Actual Project Cost, Rs. Crores 70.71 64.63 472.98<br />

Scheduled Completion February 1989 April 1991 June 1995<br />

Actual Completion February 1989 March 1991 December 1994<br />

6.2.2 Currentscenario for KRL<br />

The deregulation programme of the ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sector commenced <strong>in</strong> April<br />

1998, and the most visible impact on operations of the ref<strong>in</strong>eries due to<br />

deregulation has been vastly improved bottom l<strong>in</strong>es. In the Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price<br />

191


Mechanism (APM) regime, the marg<strong>in</strong>s of the oil companies were artificially<br />

suppressed and the <strong>in</strong>troduction of Market Determ<strong>in</strong>ed Pric<strong>in</strong>g Mechanism<br />

(MDPM)witnessed quantum jump <strong>in</strong> the profitability of these companies.<br />

The projection of gross ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> dollars per barrel made by<br />

"Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia (CLSA)" <strong>in</strong> its report on "Oil & Gas Sector - India<br />

Research" dated July 1998 for <strong>Indian</strong> oil companies is given <strong>in</strong> Table 6.2.<br />

Table 6.2 Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Company APM 1998·99 1999·00 2000-01 2001·02 2002·03<br />

MDPM MDPM MDPM MDPM MDPM<br />

10Cl 1.63 2.02 2.94 3.60 4.33 4.63<br />

HPCl 1.61 2.49 3.38 3.97 4.72 4.96<br />

BPCl 1.51 2.59 3.55 4.37 5.02 5.43<br />

KRl 1.66 2.53 3.49 4.27 4.96 5.35<br />

MRl 1.75 2.15 3.04 3.62 4.43 4.64<br />

While all the PSU ref<strong>in</strong>eries improve their marg<strong>in</strong>s substantially, BPCL<br />

and KRL show the biggest improvement due to their superior distillate yield. This<br />

projection has proved to be correct to a great extend by results from the <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Any depreciation <strong>in</strong> the value of the rupee will result <strong>in</strong> further improved marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

due to import parity pric<strong>in</strong>g for products. The de-licens<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong><br />

ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g has resulted <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up of private sector ref<strong>in</strong>eries and jo<strong>in</strong>t venture<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries with PSU participation. Pure ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g companies such as KRL, MRL<br />

and BRPL will have to ensure firm tie-up for market<strong>in</strong>g of products to ensure<br />

100% capacity utilization dur<strong>in</strong>g this period. The petroleum products market <strong>in</strong><br />

the country promises to be more dynamic and turbulent <strong>in</strong> the short-to-medium<br />

term.<br />

192


6.2.3 SWOT analysis of KRL<br />

Table 6.5 SWOT analysis of KRL<br />

Strength Weakness<br />

Capacity Dependence on IOClfor crude<br />

Capacity utilization lackofexperience <strong>in</strong> sourc<strong>in</strong>g and procurement<br />

Crude use flexibility low priority to SCM<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong>ed and motivated work force low priority to logistics<br />

Captive power generation Limited crude oil unload<strong>in</strong>g facility<br />

High netbacks lackofown market<strong>in</strong>g facility<br />

Neamess of<strong>in</strong>dustrial customers Dependence on public sector oil market<strong>in</strong>g Cos.<br />

Project management Demurrages<br />

Opportunity Threat<br />

MDPM and opportunities to <strong>in</strong>crease profit New Start up ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

Freedom for alliances and tie ups Competition among public sectors<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial freedom Small size stand alone ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

Free to expand Stricter environmental rules<br />

Neamess to <strong>in</strong>temational sea trade l<strong>in</strong>e and port No common account for logistics costs<br />

Cost reduction exercises location away from major domestic consumer centers<br />

Stable cost for crude oil Over capacity <strong>in</strong> short and medium term<br />

Product export Scarcity ofwater <strong>in</strong> Kerala<br />

SWOT analysis of KRL is done <strong>in</strong> order to understand the present position<br />

ofKRL with respect to other ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the country.<br />

6.2.3.1 Strengths of KRL<br />

KRL is above national average <strong>in</strong> capacity utilisation. It is an advantage <strong>in</strong><br />

gett<strong>in</strong>g better netbacks and more profit. KRL is consistently utiliz<strong>in</strong>g its capacity<br />

above 100% for the last five years. So capacity expansion also will give better<br />

utilization of resources and can be justified. A variety of crude oil can be<br />

processed <strong>in</strong> crude KRL. Both low sulphur and high sulphur can be processed.<br />

This <strong>in</strong>creases the flexibility <strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g the crude oil. This can also lead to better<br />

price ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> purchase of crude oil. Work force is highly tra<strong>in</strong>ed and motivated.<br />

The compensation package is also very good when compared to other <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

<strong>in</strong> the state of Kerala. So the level of satisfaction is better. Concern for<br />

environment of KRL is also very good. They are promot<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />

preservation programmes. KRL has its own captive power generation unit. It<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ates the over- dependence on state electricity board. Netback from ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> KRL is high when compared with similar ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> India. Nearness to<br />

193


<strong>in</strong>dustrial customers like FACT is an advantage for KRL. Large volumes of<br />

products like naphtha will be consumed by the large <strong>in</strong>dustrial customers. It gives<br />

an assured market for value added products. Project management is strength for<br />

KRL. All the projects taken up were completed before schedule at less than the<br />

estimated cost. So any expansion project can be taken up by KRL for its own<br />

benefit.<br />

6.2.3.2 Weaknesses<br />

At present IOCL(IT) is mak<strong>in</strong>g purchase of crude oil for all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong><br />

India. So the freedom for selection of crude oil is limited. S<strong>in</strong>ce IOCLis do<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

purchases, ref<strong>in</strong>eries like KRL could not develop the expertise <strong>in</strong> sourc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

procurement of crude oil from the <strong>in</strong>ternational market. Priority for practices like<br />

SeM is less because <strong>in</strong>tegration is almost impossible. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g of crude oil is<br />

done by one company and market<strong>in</strong>g is done by another company. Logistics<br />

performance improvement is not required because the cost of logistics is shared<br />

by other ref<strong>in</strong>eries also. So the improvements are not attempted. Crude oil<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g facilities is not sufficient to handle big ships at all times of the seasons.<br />

Thisis mak<strong>in</strong>g the unload<strong>in</strong>g as one of the major bottle necks for KRL. KRL does<br />

not do any direct market<strong>in</strong>g for the controlled products such as LPG, MS, HSD,<br />

SKO and ATF, which forms about 70 percent of the total products produced by<br />

weight. There are the four Public sector petroleum market<strong>in</strong>g companies that<br />

market controlled products of KRL. Different companies take different shares of<br />

the petroleum products produced. The graphs <strong>in</strong> Figure 6.2 show the product<br />

portfolioof each company.<br />

From figure 6.2 it can be seen that Motor Spirit (MS) forms nearly 12 to 18<br />

percent of the total products taken by the market<strong>in</strong>g companies. For BPC and<br />

IBP, MS forms a greater part of their total product marketed. HSD no doubt is<br />

the largest sold product for all companies. Its share varies from 62 to 82 percent.<br />

All the four companies take SKO, but its share for IOC and HPC is much higher.<br />

ATF is given to both IOCand BPC. LPGis not sold through IBP.<br />

194


ships is done by IOC and Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Corporation of India. KRL 's <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong><br />

this is very limited.<br />

6.2.3.3 Opportunity<br />

MDPM is an opportunity for KRL because they can make more profit due<br />

to better capacity utilization. Price be<strong>in</strong>g market driven, profit is always assured.<br />

Now ref<strong>in</strong>eries are free to have any sort of alliances. KRL can tie-up with<br />

companies, which are hav<strong>in</strong>g market<strong>in</strong>g strength. It will lead to easy capacity<br />

addition. Expansions, capacity addition, or develop<strong>in</strong>g market<strong>in</strong>g network can be<br />

made by rais<strong>in</strong>g money from any source. Government control is m<strong>in</strong>imum so the<br />

freedom for ref<strong>in</strong>eries is more. They can collect even through public issue of<br />

shares. Gett<strong>in</strong>g license for expansion or capacity addition is much simpler than<br />

the APM period. KRL can take their own decision <strong>in</strong> this regard. Now the cost<br />

reduction exercises will pay back. So implementation of methods like SCM are<br />

justified. Earlier many of the cost elements were shared by all the ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong> the<br />

country. In the post APM scenario each ref<strong>in</strong>ery can make sav<strong>in</strong>g by proper<br />

selectionof crude oil and ship for transport<strong>in</strong>g crude oil. Kochiis connected by all<br />

modes of transport to the other parts of the world. It is also near to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational sea trade l<strong>in</strong>e. So the cost of transport<strong>in</strong>g can be less and<br />

availability of ships willbe more. Crude oil price is almost stable for the last few<br />

years. It makes the crude oil purchase plann<strong>in</strong>g easier and better. Small variation<br />

can be adjusted <strong>in</strong> the sell<strong>in</strong>g price. It is possible <strong>in</strong> the MDPM. In a liberalized<br />

economy export is promoted. KRL also has chances to export to neibour<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries where there are not much ref<strong>in</strong>eries.<br />

6.2.3.4 Threat<br />

Many new ref<strong>in</strong>eries are sett<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>in</strong> India. These ref<strong>in</strong>eries have high<br />

capacity and more flexibility. These qualities will enable them to process cheaper<br />

crude oil, which will lead to more profit. Due to open<strong>in</strong>g up of economy <strong>in</strong> India<br />

even public sector ref<strong>in</strong>eries are started to compete <strong>in</strong> the market<strong>in</strong>g. This will<br />

affect the market<strong>in</strong>g of stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>eries. Capacity of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery is not<br />

enough to develop a market<strong>in</strong>g network. It is also difficult to buy and transport<br />

large quantities of crude oil <strong>in</strong> order to ga<strong>in</strong> cost advantages. environmental<br />

196


egulations are gett<strong>in</strong>g stricter these days. So the product specifications will be<br />

rigid. Present setup of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery may not be enough to meet those<br />

specifications. By complete decontrol, the cost shar<strong>in</strong>g of logistics will disappear.<br />

KRL will be forced to meet all the logistic costs by themselves. Smaller parcel<br />

sizes of crude oil will be a disadvantage for KRL. Location of KRLis at south most<br />

end of India. Both crude oil and ref<strong>in</strong>ed products must be transported more.<br />

Capacity expansion may <strong>in</strong>crease the problem. KRL products are marketed only<br />

<strong>in</strong> India. Products demand for the near future is not expected to surpass the<br />

production. Capacity addition may <strong>in</strong>crease this problem also. KRL is depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on water from a river for all requirements. Ground water level <strong>in</strong> Kerala is<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>ggradually. Scarcity of water can be problem <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />

6.2.3.5 Recommendations of SWOT analysis<br />

The area of <strong>in</strong>ternational trade of crude presents opportunities to explore<br />

the <strong>in</strong>ternational crude markets and select and buy suitable crude <strong>in</strong> right size<br />

parcels at the right time from the right supplier so as to maximize ref<strong>in</strong>ery profits.<br />

This is a special area of <strong>in</strong>ternational trade where KRLhas no expertise at present<br />

but must soon build some, if not presently to get <strong>in</strong>to buy<strong>in</strong>g directly, but to<br />

monitor purchases for KRL by IOCL to see if its <strong>in</strong>terests are be<strong>in</strong>g protected<br />

properly. This is an area where expertise cannot be built overnight and therefore<br />

start<strong>in</strong>g early is important. With reference to shipp<strong>in</strong>g also the expertise and<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement of KRL is m<strong>in</strong>imal. It is the OCC that through the Shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Corporation of India (SC!) arranges for all petroleum product related shipp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Therefore one is not sure whether the optimal size vessels are be<strong>in</strong>g used to<br />

transport crude at the most appropriate dates. There are chances that crude<br />

movement is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by seI ship availability.Ifthis is true, they willshift the<br />

burden of this <strong>in</strong>efficiency <strong>in</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g onto the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t moor<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

good option <strong>in</strong> overcom<strong>in</strong>g the problems <strong>in</strong> jetty operations. KRL must consider<br />

capacity addition with new technology because it will lead to <strong>in</strong>creased flexibility<br />

<strong>in</strong> crude oil selection. This will give the ref<strong>in</strong>ery more value-added products. It<br />

will also help <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ternational product specifications. KRL must<br />

develop its own market<strong>in</strong>g network for market<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ed products. This will<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease the profit of the company and freedom <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g and selection of<br />

197


crude oil also will be more. Implementation of SCM will further improve the<br />

profitability of KRL.<br />

6.3 Logistics Operations <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> of KRL<br />

Practices <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound logistics are analysed <strong>in</strong><br />

this session. Inbound logistics be<strong>in</strong>g complexed, It is analysed separately and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal and outbound logistics comb<strong>in</strong>ed together for the purpose of study. The<br />

objective of this part of the work was to study the processes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>bound<br />

logistics, and to analyse them for weaknesses and problems. Important tools used<br />

for the above were work study techniques study of documents and manuals, and<br />

discussion with managers and workers.<br />

6.3.1 Issues <strong>in</strong> logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, supply cha<strong>in</strong> is very important s<strong>in</strong>ce, this is a material<br />

movement <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>dustry. A block diagram show<strong>in</strong>g the supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Oil and petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry is shown <strong>in</strong> figure 6.1. The upstream sector faces the<br />

problem of decid<strong>in</strong>g which wells to tap for how much crude, so that over<br />

production does not have adverse impact on world oil prices. It also has to<br />

manage the logistics of storage of crude produced and arrange for sale and<br />

shipment of the same. Therefore crude tanker load<strong>in</strong>g operations form a critical<br />

operation for them. For a downstream operator, the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, key supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

issuesare as given under:<br />

Crude oil Procurement: The major issues here be<strong>in</strong>g decisions<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g when to purchase? How much of what crude to purchase? And From<br />

whomto purchase?<br />

Crude oil shipp<strong>in</strong>g: This decision has to be exam<strong>in</strong>ed along with the<br />

Crude procurement decision. Here one has to decide when to ship from which<br />

load port <strong>in</strong> what capacity of ship. That is decid<strong>in</strong>g on the carriers for mov<strong>in</strong>gthe<br />

crude from the load port to the unload<strong>in</strong>g port.<br />

Unload<strong>in</strong>g port operations: When the crude carriers and ships for<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g products come, they have to be received, berthed and crude unloaded or<br />

product loaded as required. The ma<strong>in</strong> problem that occurs here is restrictions put<br />

198


on vessel size due to draft limitations due to which more economical and larger<br />

vessels cannot be used for br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> crude. Delay<strong>in</strong> berth<strong>in</strong>g of vessels or <strong>in</strong> their<br />

sail<strong>in</strong>g out also occur at times due to lack of night navigation facilities (night<br />

pilotage). The ma<strong>in</strong> problem <strong>in</strong> relation to operation plann<strong>in</strong>g occurs due to the<br />

bunch<strong>in</strong>g of vessel arrivals creat<strong>in</strong>g a situation when there are many vessels<br />

wait<strong>in</strong>gfor berth<strong>in</strong>g, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> demurrage payment. There are also times when<br />

the berth is unoccupied and the crude handl<strong>in</strong>g facilities are idl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Crude Oil Storage: This area of ref<strong>in</strong>ery logistics has its special<br />

problems. The allocation of storage tanks to different types of crude is one such<br />

problem. This should be done <strong>in</strong> such a way that required ullage is available for<br />

the required crude at the time required. Also, enough storage capacity to act as an<br />

effective buffer between supply fluctuations on one hand and production demand<br />

variations on the other is essential. S<strong>in</strong>ce crude is an expensive commodity excess<br />

storage of the same should as far as possible avoided.<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery operations: The configuration of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery Le. the different<br />

units <strong>in</strong> it and their capacities and its range of operability should have be<br />

balanced. Bythis, it means that as far as possible there should be no need to build<br />

up <strong>in</strong>terstage buffers <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The ref<strong>in</strong>ery should also be flexible <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

of its ability to ref<strong>in</strong>e a wide variety of crude. Its operat<strong>in</strong>g characteristics should<br />

be such that more of distillates hav<strong>in</strong>g higher demand and giv<strong>in</strong>g more returns<br />

should be produced. The products produced should be requir<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ished product storage and blend<strong>in</strong>g: As <strong>in</strong> the case of crude oil<br />

tankage, a crucial decision here also is which tanks to allot to which products.<br />

Both offl<strong>in</strong>e and on l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g options are available. The former is the<br />

traditional method, and requires less <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> mach<strong>in</strong>ery, but requires more<br />

product storage tankage. On-l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g is a more recent addition to ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

operations; it is <strong>in</strong>strumentation and automation <strong>in</strong>tensive option that<br />

significantly reduces the product tankage requirement and product <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

carried by the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.


parcel size is around a few thousand tons, the transportation is done by road <strong>in</strong><br />

Tanker lorries. This offers the greatest flexibility <strong>in</strong> route and parcel size and mix<br />

and is the only means of deliver<strong>in</strong>g products to retail outlets directly.<br />

Annual plans for crude and Product movement<br />

OEB<br />

•<br />

Monthly Crude Procurement Plan, ICM Monthly Product Sale plan and its movement, SPM<br />

'"<br />

Crude Shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Schedule CSM<br />

+<br />

/<br />

Crude Ship Arrival and Unload<strong>in</strong>g atKochi Port<br />

Storage ofcrude and settl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Charg<strong>in</strong>g to CDU 1 or 2 and other<br />

Plants<br />

Storage ofOutput and blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Sales and Transfer<br />

Storage Depots<br />

Tankers<br />

Figure 6.1 <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery limited<br />

200<br />

Issues: Crude Quantity Discrepancies,<br />

Terms ofCharter, Demurrage, Ocean and<br />

Unload<strong>in</strong>g losses.<br />

Issues: Storage capacities, tank allotments,<br />

Insufficient settl<strong>in</strong>g time, storage losses.<br />

Issues: Actual quantity charged, Process<br />

Optimization, Fuel and loss,<br />

Actual quantities produced.<br />

Issues: Actual quantity received, blend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Optimization, tank allocation to products,<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g storage losses.<br />

Issues: Measurement ofquantity,<br />

Payment verification Bill<strong>in</strong>g and dispatch,<br />

Excise duty and sales tax account<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

payment,<br />

Reconciliation ofSales with stocks <strong>in</strong> tanks,<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g handl<strong>in</strong>g losses.<br />

I Wagon Load<strong>in</strong>g


The railway wagon rake is used to transport products to big storage depots<br />

of market<strong>in</strong>g companies located at railway sid<strong>in</strong>gs. The third means of transport<br />

is the pipel<strong>in</strong>e; this is only economical if bulk movement is required. The only<br />

problem with this is its very high <strong>in</strong>itial cost, but the operation cost ofthis is very<br />

low. The rigidity of route and fixed source and dest<strong>in</strong>ation is another problem<br />

with this means of transport. This is used for short distance transport of bulk<br />

products to market<strong>in</strong>g company depots and large users nearby. The nextmode of<br />

movement is by ships. This becomes economical only with large parcels and to<br />

greater distances. This is used for movement of products from one port location<br />

to another. It is also the only means many a time, for exports.<br />

The value addition that takes place <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is due to the separation of<br />

crude oil <strong>in</strong>to distillates and heavy ends that each have separate demands and<br />

uses. It is the total amount of crude that is processed that will ultimately <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

the bottom l<strong>in</strong>e. The supply cha<strong>in</strong> of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries Ltd. can be divided <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

conventional three parts, of Inbound, Internal and outbound logistics. Inbound<br />

logisticsis discussed <strong>in</strong> the sections below.<br />

The Inbound logistics consists of all activities done to plan and implement<br />

procurement and delivery of crude necessary for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The movement of<br />

crude oil <strong>in</strong> the case of KRL is <strong>in</strong> discrete parcel form, unlike some ref<strong>in</strong>eries that<br />

have pipel<strong>in</strong>es from the oil fields. The only means of br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude to the<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery is by sea route. The ma<strong>in</strong> decision problems that are encountered <strong>in</strong> the<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g stage are discussed below.<br />

6.3.2 Monthly plans<br />

The monthly plann<strong>in</strong>g for crude supply and product movement is done<br />

through three important meet<strong>in</strong>g called the Industry Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation Meet<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />

Crude Slate Meet<strong>in</strong>g and the <strong>Supply</strong> Plan Meet<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

6.3.2.1 Industry Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation Meet<strong>in</strong>g (ICM)<br />

This is the monthly meet<strong>in</strong>g held to achieve the follow<strong>in</strong>g objectives:<br />

• To create a platform to br<strong>in</strong>g together all members of the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

for shar<strong>in</strong>g of the <strong>in</strong>dustry news and to plan for the future<br />

201


ahead<br />

• To discuss and review status of the short and medium term projects<br />

undertaken by the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

• Totake stock of the previous month performance for the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

• To discuss the current month's performance till date and plan changes<br />

required<br />

• To present the problems envisaged In the next month and discuss<br />

possible solutions<br />

• Discussand f<strong>in</strong>alize crude requirements for the month after next<br />

• To f<strong>in</strong>alize next month's crude requirements for the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

• To f<strong>in</strong>alize and match next month's production and requirements for the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

• To review <strong>in</strong>ventory status of crude and products<br />

This is the <strong>in</strong>dustry meet<strong>in</strong>g to make a roll<strong>in</strong>g plan for the three moths<br />

6.3.2.2 Crude Slate Meet<strong>in</strong>g (CSM)<br />

This meet<strong>in</strong>g is held after the ICM every month with OCC, IOC(Shipp<strong>in</strong>g),<br />

Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Corporation of India and the representatives from each ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

attend<strong>in</strong>g it. The aim of this meet<strong>in</strong>g is to f<strong>in</strong>alize the crude allocation to each<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery by decid<strong>in</strong>g the crude type and parcel size for different tankers, allott<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them to different ref<strong>in</strong>eries and schedul<strong>in</strong>g their arrivals at discharge ports. The<br />

crude requirement for next month of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery projected <strong>in</strong> the ICM is after<br />

consolidation by OCC(Technical) given to IOC(IT). They obta<strong>in</strong> quotes for crude.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial crude shipp<strong>in</strong>g schedule is then made <strong>in</strong> consultation with IOC<br />

(Shipp<strong>in</strong>g). Here, a model that takes as <strong>in</strong>put, data regard<strong>in</strong>g crude and crude<br />

tanker availability from load ports, crude requirement of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery and<br />

laydays available at load and discharge ports and gives as output and optimum<br />

crude allotment schedule is used. This schedule gives the type and quantity of<br />

crude allotted the tanker schedule to reach the discharge port for the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

This crude allocation, and tanker schedule forms the basis for the CSM. The<br />

purpose of the CSM is to provide opportunities for the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

202


• Exchange two crude between two ref<strong>in</strong>eries<br />

• Move one tanker scheduled for one ref<strong>in</strong>ery to another to take care of<br />

emergencies<br />

• To cancel or postpone certa<strong>in</strong> tanker schedules<br />

• To allot certa<strong>in</strong> unallotted crude available to the ref<strong>in</strong>eries that can process<br />

them<br />

• The result is the allotment and tanker schedule of crude<br />

• The Bill of Lad<strong>in</strong>g holder for all parcels for the month is also f<strong>in</strong>alized<br />

6.3.2.3 <strong>Supply</strong> Plan Meet<strong>in</strong>g (SPM)<br />

This meet<strong>in</strong>g is usually held on the day after the Crude Slate Meet<strong>in</strong>g. This<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g is held to plan for the movement of petroleum products from the<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>eries to the depots and from there to the sales outlets. This has to be done at<br />

least cost to meet the demand subject to constra<strong>in</strong>ts such as load<strong>in</strong>g capacity,<br />

rake availability, and ullage availability. As far as possible no ref<strong>in</strong>ery should<br />

have problem of excess products <strong>in</strong> store and therefore no ullage to keep newly<br />

produced product forc<strong>in</strong>g it to slow down throughput. The Production figures,<br />

and demand projections by the oil market<strong>in</strong>g companies dur<strong>in</strong>g the ICMare used<br />

by acc to prepare the <strong>in</strong>itial product allocation plan for different oil market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies. This serves as the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for discussions dur<strong>in</strong>g the SPM.<br />

The <strong>Supply</strong> Plan Meet<strong>in</strong>g is held <strong>in</strong> two parts the first part held <strong>in</strong> the<br />

morn<strong>in</strong>g has participants from OCC(Operations), OCC(Technical), Oil market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies and the representatives of each ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The objective ofthis meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is to f<strong>in</strong>alize the production numbers and off-takes from each ref<strong>in</strong>ery. This is<br />

then used by acc (Logistics) to do an LP run to get the plan for product<br />

evacuation from all ref<strong>in</strong>eries dur<strong>in</strong>g the next month. General issues regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g and distribution and the problems faced there are also discussed here.<br />

<strong>Indian</strong> Railways will jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the second half of the meet<strong>in</strong>g. This meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

deliberates on and f<strong>in</strong>alizes the rake allotment and wagon movement plan for the<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g month. This is a meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> which the oil market<strong>in</strong>g companies and the<br />

<strong>Indian</strong> railways play the major role <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. KRL's role is limited <strong>in</strong><br />

safe guard<strong>in</strong>g its <strong>in</strong>terest of see<strong>in</strong>g that the f<strong>in</strong>ished product <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>in</strong> its stock<br />

203


ema<strong>in</strong> as low as possible, and on no occasion chok<strong>in</strong>g of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery occurs<br />

because of non-movement of products.<br />

The process units <strong>in</strong> KRL have flexibility to process different types of crude<br />

oil. However, <strong>in</strong> order to facilitate production of Benzene and Toluene, the<br />

company has to process approximately 3.5 MMTPA of Bombay High or<br />

equivalent high aromatic type of crude oil. Presently, the crude mix to be<br />

processed <strong>in</strong> a particular year is broadly decided dur<strong>in</strong>g negotiations with the<br />

Government for f<strong>in</strong>alization of the MoD document for the Year. The monthly<br />

allocation is generally <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the agreed crude oil mix <strong>in</strong> the MoD and is<br />

decided dur<strong>in</strong>g the monthly crude slate meet<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Government has now permitted the private sector ref<strong>in</strong>eries and jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

venture ref<strong>in</strong>eries to source their own crude oil directly. However, pure ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies <strong>in</strong> the public sector viz. KRL, MRL and BRPL and the Oil Ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gand<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g companies viz. HPCL and BPCL cannot directly import crude oil. The<br />

crude oil requirement for these companies is still be<strong>in</strong>g canalised by IOCL.<br />

However, after complete deregulation of the petroleum sector slated after 2002,<br />

procurement of crude oil would be decanalised and hence KRL has to make its<br />

own arrangements for sourc<strong>in</strong>g and procurement of crude oil.<br />

It is imperative that KRL acquire adequate expertise <strong>in</strong> sourc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

procurement of crude oil <strong>in</strong> advance to maximize the profits of the company<br />

under deregulated scenario. About 95% of the total operat<strong>in</strong>g cost of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

usually are represented by cost of crude oil. The decision on crude selection<br />

shouldbe based on net back analysis and product supply commitments.<br />

6.3.3 Inbound Logistics Operations<br />

Inbound logistics starts with the selection of crude and its procurement<br />

function for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The current practice is to evaluate the crude proposed by<br />

acc and if found suitable to ask for the same <strong>in</strong> the OEB and the ICM<br />

submissions. Firm figures of when and how much of what crude KRL will get<br />

comes only after the crude slate meet<strong>in</strong>g. These are only plan figures and actual<br />

figures, specially the date of tanker arrival at Kochi varies much from slated<br />

dates. The type of crude rarely varies but the quantity varies by about plus or<br />

m<strong>in</strong>us 5 percentage and the date of discharge varies by about 2 to 3 days.<br />

204


With reference to shipp<strong>in</strong>g also the expertise and <strong>in</strong>volvement of KRL is<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imal. It is the OCC that through the Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Corporation of India (SC!)<br />

arranges for all petroleum product related shipp<strong>in</strong>g. Therefore one is not sure<br />

whether the optimal size vessels are be<strong>in</strong>g used to transport crude at the most<br />

appropriate dates. There are chances that crude movement is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by SCI<br />

ship availability. This if true, will shift the burden of this <strong>in</strong>efficiency <strong>in</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

onto the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Thus KRL should build expertise <strong>in</strong> these two important areas<br />

on a priority basis.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>bound logistics operations consists of three important parts (i) the<br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g, berth<strong>in</strong>g and unload<strong>in</strong>g of the tankers (ii) the storage of crude oil <strong>in</strong><br />

Tank farm (iii) the account<strong>in</strong>g of crude receipts, shipp<strong>in</strong>g and related charges and<br />

their payment and settlement of disputes. All these functions are discussed <strong>in</strong><br />

separate sections below.<br />

6.3.3.1 Shipp<strong>in</strong>g and Jetty Operations for Crude<br />

Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>eries uses Kochi port for gett<strong>in</strong>g all its crude. The ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

which has a process<strong>in</strong>g capacity of 7.5 million metric tons of crude per annum,<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>es 4.26 MT of Bombay high crude, 2.08 MT of imported Lowsulfur crude and<br />

1MTof imported high sulfur Persian Gulf crude dur<strong>in</strong>g 1999-2000. This results <strong>in</strong><br />

the requirement to handle on an average of about 17 crude tankers per month<br />

(m<strong>in</strong>imum of 4 tankers <strong>in</strong> May to maximum of 24 tankers <strong>in</strong> December). The<br />

parcel size of these tankers varied from 24,918 MT to 59,932 MT with the mean at<br />

38,927 MT (April 98 to March 99 data).<br />

The Kochi Port has three jetties for oil handl<strong>in</strong>g called South Tanker berth<br />

(STB), North tanker berth (NTB) and the Coch<strong>in</strong> Oil term<strong>in</strong>al (COT). Some more<br />

details regard<strong>in</strong>g these are given <strong>in</strong> table 6.1. It may be noted that though the<br />

maximum pump<strong>in</strong>g rate is shown at 2500 MT per hour this is not achieved <strong>in</strong><br />

practice. From the data for 1998-99 it can be seen that the actual pump<strong>in</strong>g rates<br />

for the ships range from about 1000 to 2000 with the average be<strong>in</strong>g 1500MT per<br />

Hour. This be<strong>in</strong>g the case, a simple calculation shown below reveals that about<br />

57% of the year crude pump<strong>in</strong>g should be work<strong>in</strong>g to meet the ref<strong>in</strong>ery's<br />

requirement. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the fact that monsoon limits operations to 50% of<br />

205


normal levels dur<strong>in</strong>g four months of the year the pump<strong>in</strong>g requirement for the<br />

rest of the year becomes 68 %. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the fact that about 204 crude tankers<br />

have to be handled per year, and that pump<strong>in</strong>g of crude cannot take place dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the 12 hours gap that comes between pump<strong>in</strong>g from successive tankers the crude<br />

pipel<strong>in</strong>e utilization goes up to 103 percentage. This creates an impossible<br />

situation. Thus there is urgent need to <strong>in</strong>crease the average pump<strong>in</strong>g capacity of<br />

the crude from the ships.<br />

Hours ofpump<strong>in</strong>g required per year = Le. Ref<strong>in</strong>ery capacity/pump<strong>in</strong>g rate = 7500000/1500 =5000<br />

hrs.<br />

A.<br />

B.<br />

Pump<strong>in</strong>g time required = (Hours ofpump<strong>in</strong>g/ Hours <strong>in</strong> a year)*1 00=(5000/8760)*1 00=57 %<br />

Pump<strong>in</strong>g time with monsoon = (5000/(24*30.4*8+12*30.4*4))*100<br />

=68%<br />

C. Percentage ofpump<strong>in</strong>g time with monsoon and berth<strong>in</strong>g time allowance of 12 hours<br />

between a ship departure and a berth<strong>in</strong>g =(5000/{(24*30.4*8+12*30.4*4)-204*12})*100<br />

=103 %<br />

D. The same calculation as C. but with <strong>in</strong>ter ship time 18 hours <strong>in</strong>stead of 12<br />

=(5000/{(24*30.4*8+12*30.4*4)-204*18})*1 00=137 %<br />

E. The same calculation as C. but with <strong>in</strong>ter ship time 24 hours <strong>in</strong>stead of 12<br />

=(5000/{(24*30.4*8+12*30.4*4)-204*24})*100= 208 %<br />

Based on the above calculations results are presented <strong>in</strong> table 6.4. It shows<br />

the effect of change <strong>in</strong> average pump<strong>in</strong>g rate, and <strong>in</strong>ter ship gap <strong>in</strong> berth<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

the need for utilization of crude l<strong>in</strong>es from jettyto KRL.<br />

Table 6.3 Details of Berths available atKochi fortforoil handl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Name of Jetty Draft <strong>in</strong> Feet below Pump<strong>in</strong>g rate <strong>in</strong><br />

Chart datum MT per Hr.<br />

Kochi Oil Term<strong>in</strong>al (COT) 38 2500 Crude<br />

Oil handled<br />

North Tanker berth (NTB) 30 2500 Crude and Products<br />

South Tanker berth (STB) 29 2500 Products<br />

Table 6.4 Analysis show<strong>in</strong>g thecrude handl<strong>in</strong>g bottleneck atKochi port<br />

Average pump<strong>in</strong>g Rate MTper Hr. 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500<br />

A. Normal Crude pump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> % 68.49 57.08 48.92 42.80 38.05 34.25<br />

B. with monsoon allowance <strong>in</strong> % 82.24 68.53 58.74 51.40 45.69 41.12<br />

C. with monsoon allowance+12hrs% 123.76 103.14 88.40 77.35 68.76 61.88<br />

D.with monsoon allowance+18hrs% 165.56 137.97 118.26 103.48 91.98 82.78<br />

E. with monsoon allowance+24hrs% 250 208.33 178.57 156.25 138.89 125<br />

206


Recommendations<br />

It has been proved beyond doubt that the crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations at<br />

Kochi Port is a major bottleneck. Therefore means of augment<strong>in</strong>g this facility has<br />

to be planned and implemented at the earliest. As a very temporary measure one<br />

has to ensure that pump<strong>in</strong>g of crude from tankers is at near maximum allowable<br />

pressures. Ships that are not capable of meet<strong>in</strong>g this pump<strong>in</strong>g requirement<br />

should be avoided, especially <strong>in</strong> months when above 16 ships have to be received.<br />

It is seen that soon after monsoon there is a crude <strong>in</strong>ventory build-up. Ifthis is<br />

not for strategic and defense related reasons (KRL crude stock be<strong>in</strong>g a part of<br />

India's strategic oil reserves) then the crude <strong>in</strong>ventory need not be built up <strong>in</strong> the<br />

months of October to December. It can be built to sufficiently high levels dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the period from January to mid-May, just before the onset of the monsoon; this<br />

strategy will result <strong>in</strong> reduced <strong>in</strong>ventory carry<strong>in</strong>g charges for crude. It may<br />

however be noted that, the crude pipel<strong>in</strong>e discharge constra<strong>in</strong>t will come <strong>in</strong> the<br />

way of implement<strong>in</strong>g the above suggestion fully. It was also be noted that one of<br />

the four chicksuns at COT is not be<strong>in</strong>g used for some time now, this disuse of a<br />

very expensive piece of equipment will render it useless after some time.<br />

Therefore the recommendation is that arrangements to use three of the four<br />

chicksuns by rotation should be done.<br />

6.3.3.3 Short Term Solutions Recommended<br />

A. As a short-term measure, the use of drag reducers to improve discharge<br />

rates of crude from the tankers may be considered. However the ma<strong>in</strong> problems<br />

withits use are the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

There will be some capital <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong>itially to have the necessary<br />

equipment for the <strong>in</strong>jection of GEL Flow improvers <strong>in</strong>to the crude l<strong>in</strong>es. The<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g cost with this type of solution is comparatively high because of high<br />

cost of the GEL used. There are fears that its use might affect the quality of<br />

distillates especially the ATF and JP-5. KRL pipel<strong>in</strong>e is old and if corroded, the<br />

greater pipe roughness will adversely affect the performance of the drag reducer.<br />

As compared to smooth flat terra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> most parts where pipel<strong>in</strong>es are laid, KRL<br />

crude pipel<strong>in</strong>es have sharper bends, which have adverse affect on drag reducer<br />

211


performance. The use of these has proven economical for long distance pipel<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

It is not much <strong>in</strong> use <strong>in</strong> short distance pipel<strong>in</strong>es, such as KRL's crudepipel<strong>in</strong>e. At<br />

best also it can only be a short-term solution because of the above limitations,<br />

and not a permanent one.<br />

B. Another short-term solution is to make arrangements for br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Suez­<br />

max tankers to COT. These tankers could be used just before monsoonsto build<br />

up the crude <strong>in</strong>ventory. These tankers may br<strong>in</strong>g crude parcels of about80,000<br />

MT. The major issues that have to be catered to make this possible are the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

A draft survey of the channel and COT area has to be undertaken to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

the patches where ma<strong>in</strong>tenance dredg<strong>in</strong>g will have to be done to meet the draft<br />

requirement of Suez-max vessels. The capacity of the fenders at COT has to be<br />

checked to f<strong>in</strong>d if it is capable of tak<strong>in</strong>g the shock of impact by the Suez-max<br />

vesselwith the crude parcel. Ifnot sufficient augmentation of fender capacity has<br />

to be made. Another way of handl<strong>in</strong>g this problem is with the <strong>in</strong>stallation of a<br />

velocity meter at COTthat will call out the velocity of the tanker as it approaches<br />

the berth. This will be known to the pilot, and the tugs help<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> berth<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> better control of the approach<strong>in</strong>g velocity, so that the impact on the<br />

fenders is reduced. Arrangement for moor<strong>in</strong>g of the longer Suez-max vessel. The<br />

fore and aft moor<strong>in</strong>gs of the tanker will require, <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g more bollards. A cost­<br />

effective solution <strong>in</strong> this matter could be us<strong>in</strong>g float<strong>in</strong>g dolph<strong>in</strong> buoys with<br />

pelican hooks to moor the Suez-max tankers. The breast l<strong>in</strong>es from the Suez-max<br />

tankers could be tied to the exist<strong>in</strong>g bollards. The next problem that could be<br />

encountered is when the vessel has to be turned before sail<strong>in</strong>g off. From the<br />

discussions with some CPT personnel <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a pilot, it was noticed that the<br />

present turn<strong>in</strong>g circle is large enough for a Suez-max vessel to turn. This was also<br />

demonstrated when one suez-max tanker was brought to CPT<br />

C. The best short term solution appears to be to make arrangements for<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the pipel<strong>in</strong>e now be<strong>in</strong>g used for Blackoil movement from plant to jetty for<br />

the purpose of crude pump<strong>in</strong>g when it is free and not be<strong>in</strong>g used for product<br />

movement. This is made possible will considerably decrease the ship unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />

212


times associated demurrage and will help remove the crude pipel<strong>in</strong>e capacity<br />

bottleneck to a very great extent.<br />

6.3.3.4 Permanent Solution-S<strong>in</strong>gle Po<strong>in</strong>t Moor<strong>in</strong>g (SPM)<br />

The Proposal for the S<strong>in</strong>gle Po<strong>in</strong>t Moor<strong>in</strong>g system be<strong>in</strong>g exam<strong>in</strong>ed by KRL<br />

appears to be the only stable and permanent solution to this problem. It is the<br />

type of solution that is required for this press<strong>in</strong>g need for more crude unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />

facility. It was noticed that KRL is exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two alternative proposals, one <strong>in</strong><br />

which the SPM will be located nearer to the shore at a site where only vessels of<br />

up to LR-2 make or Suez-max can be accommodated. The second proposal is to<br />

locate the SPM at a site further off the coast at a site where the draft is enough for<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g VLCC vessels also.<br />

At this po<strong>in</strong>t it is important to make two observations regard<strong>in</strong>g project<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g and implementation that were observed dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of this study.<br />

The first relates to the time horizon of strategic plans of KRL. Most plans<br />

implemented by KRL were with the present and medium time <strong>in</strong> view. A long­<br />

term perspective to project selection and implementation, when deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

facility creation, will be more desirable now with the open<strong>in</strong>g up of the oil sector.<br />

At this po<strong>in</strong>t it is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that the <strong>in</strong>itial crude pipel<strong>in</strong>e laid for the 2.75 MT<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery laid at the time of <strong>in</strong>itial commission<strong>in</strong>g of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, has enough<br />

surplus capacity to more or less cater to the current requirement of the expanded<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery with 7.5 MMTPA capacity. This foresight has to be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed especially<br />

when creat<strong>in</strong>g key facilities, where <strong>in</strong>cremental addition of facility later make it<br />

difficult and prohibitively expensive once the project is over.<br />

The second observation is regard<strong>in</strong>g project implementation. KRL's<br />

strengths are <strong>in</strong> selection equipment and of partners for project implementation.<br />

However, one important th<strong>in</strong>g that is often overlooked is the way the facility will<br />

be operated after commission<strong>in</strong>g (that is the operability po<strong>in</strong>t of view). It is worth<br />

not<strong>in</strong>g here that small changes and facilities if <strong>in</strong>corporated to facilitate<br />

operations will go a long way is improv<strong>in</strong>g system performance. The<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ability aspects are also underplayed at design and commission<strong>in</strong>g stage,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> permanent problems for the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance staff. This problem is not<br />

213


unique of KRL; it is also the problem of most other project organizations. When<br />

evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the benefits of SPM proposal it is important to consider at least the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>gbenefits that KRL will get from it:<br />

• Inventory carry<strong>in</strong>g cost released from reduced need for <strong>in</strong>ventory carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Netback from utilization of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity that was unutilized due to<br />

lack of crude supplies<br />

• Sav<strong>in</strong>gs from reduced demurrage paid to crude tankers<br />

• Sav<strong>in</strong>gs from crude transportation charges occurr<strong>in</strong>g due to use of larger<br />

tankers for crude transport<br />

• Crude handl<strong>in</strong>g charges that can be apportioned from ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g charges of<br />

future expansion<br />

• Money released from cancellation of the need of some new crude storage<br />

tanks that are planned for the capacity addition project, because of release<br />

of some crude storage tanks from the current set as a result of reduced<br />

crude storage requirement with SPM.<br />

• Sav<strong>in</strong>gs from reduction <strong>in</strong> charges to be paid to Kochi port trust for crude<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

6.3.3.5 Tankers com<strong>in</strong>g to Kochi and their performance<br />

In the days of APM costs were not much of a concern especially s<strong>in</strong>ce, the<br />

shipp<strong>in</strong>g costs that were paid from a common pool account. The post APM<br />

conditions make it necessary to monitor this important cost closely. It is but<br />

natural that different ships have different features that make some more cost<br />

effective <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> routes compared to others. The important features of a crude<br />

tanker from KRL po<strong>in</strong>t of view are the follow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• The flag of the ship, this is important s<strong>in</strong>ce port charges are less for <strong>Indian</strong><br />

ships.<br />

• The hire charges per day and other charges such as fuel etc. for the tanker.<br />

• Familiarity of the master and crew with CPT and KRL.<br />

• The carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the vessel. The nearer the carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the<br />

vessel to the parcel size planned the more economical would it be.<br />

• The loaded draft requirement of the vessel. This should be with<strong>in</strong> what is<br />

available at COT.<br />

• The number of pumps on board and theirdischarge capacity. This should<br />

be at least the maximum KRL can allow.<br />

214


In order to understand which tankers have comparatively lower freights, it<br />

was collected and analyzed the freight data for some ships that have come to CPT<br />

with crude for KRL <strong>in</strong> the past, this data was collected from the crude cell. The<br />

tankers have been classified <strong>in</strong>to those that came with imported crude, and those<br />

that come with BH crude. The classifications of tankers that come with crude for<br />

KRL are given <strong>in</strong> the table 6.5.<br />

Table 6.5 Ships and theirdetails<br />

TYPE OWlCapacity<br />

Max pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rate<br />

OWl Load for<br />

KRL<br />

Draft Reqmt<br />

(full)<br />

MR 40,000 2040 Vhr 37,000 10M<br />

LR 1 63,000 2720Vhr 49,000 12 M<br />

LR2 87,000 4080Vhr 58,000 14 M<br />

Suez max 1,47,000 6125Vhr 80,000 16 M<br />

The study of ship-wise performance has not been a practice at KRL<br />

because the crude shipp<strong>in</strong>g costs were met from a common pool account dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

APM. This situation is slowly chang<strong>in</strong>g; therefore ship-wise performance track<strong>in</strong>g<br />

has become important now. As a beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to this exercise the data was collected<br />

for all crude tanker arrivals dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998-1999 and analyzed for ship wise<br />

performance. The summary of the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs is presented <strong>in</strong> Table 6.5. The<br />

important parameters shown <strong>in</strong> the table and their significance will now be<br />

discussed. The tanker names are used to identify them. The total crude brought<br />

by each tanker dur<strong>in</strong>g the period of 1998-99 and the number of trips made by<br />

each are used to calculate the average parcel size brought by the tanker to CPT.<br />

This data gives <strong>in</strong>formation about how regular a tanker is <strong>in</strong> the KRL circuit and<br />

the amount of part load<strong>in</strong>g that is done for it. The next column gives the mean<br />

NOR to berth<strong>in</strong>g time this is the measure of the average time the tanker spends<br />

outside CPT wait<strong>in</strong>g to be berthed and this is ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to bunch<strong>in</strong>g of ship<br />

arrivals or due to longer berth occupancy by the previous tanker due to slow<br />

discharge.<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> the next column is regard<strong>in</strong>g the mean time from berth<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

start of discharge. This time should be around two hours and is someth<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

has to be controlled if it is consistently high for some vessel the reasons for the<br />

same have to be looked <strong>in</strong>to.<br />

215


Table 6.6 Performance of tankers that brought KRL crude <strong>in</strong> 1998-99<br />

Tanker Name Total No Averag Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean<br />

(1) Crude of e NOR Berth pump<strong>in</strong> End Hrs of Demurrage Discha<br />

(2) Trip Parcel to to gtime pump over stay atRs. rge<br />

s size Berth pump Hrs to excess 20,000 Per rate <strong>in</strong><br />

(3) (4) Hrs. Hrs. (7). sail of36 hrs Hr TI Hr.<br />

(5) (6) Hrs. (9) (10) (11)<br />

(8)<br />

ABTarapore 315708 8 39463 42.66 5.59 24.84 3.31 40.91 818125 1598<br />

AFriendshi 50084 1 50084 7.25 2.25 36.00 0.50 10.00 200000 1391<br />

Abdul Hamid 88430 2 44215 51.00 2.13 26.88 1.25 45.25 905000 1640<br />

Addai 43274 1 43274 3.50 4.50 42.00 0.75 14.75 295000 1030<br />

AJex 24918 1 24918 107.3 7.50 17.75 0.50 97.00 1940000 1404<br />

AJ<strong>in</strong>a 55566 1 55566 60.25 3.25 40.50 1.00 69.00 1380000 1372<br />

BCChattergi 377251 12 31438 28.90 7.17 21.77 1.46 25.46 509167 1453<br />

BRAmbedkar 444657 9 49406 82.33 6.42 31.72 2.33 86.80 1736000 1574<br />

CPShivaji 571567 12 47631 35.81 4.81 36.05 2.92 43.60 871917 1399<br />

CVRaman 680654 23 29594 36.39 4.45 18.80 3.02 27.83 556522 1616<br />

GB SSalaria 260881 6 43480 56.08 2.04 26.75 2.88 52.13 1042500 1631<br />

Homi Bhaba 550963 19 28998 36.78 3.45 19.87 1.96 27.66 553105 1484<br />

JNS<strong>in</strong>gh 79152 2 39576 28.63 2.00 18.50 6.00 19.13 382500 2260<br />

JNehru 142954 3 47651 17.50 4.75 25.25 0.67 16.25 325000 1899<br />

Jadu S<strong>in</strong>gh 46333 1 46333 2.25 2.00 23.00 0.75 0.00 0 2014<br />

Jadunath S<strong>in</strong>gh 40681 1 40681 6.50 2.00 22.25 4.75 0.00 0 '1828<br />

Jog<strong>in</strong>der S<strong>in</strong>gh 40406 1 40406 114.0 4.00 24.00 8.75 114.75 2295000 1684<br />

LMTilak 205236 4 51309 61.31 1.94 57.94 8.44 93.63 1872500 943<br />

MD SThapa 429279 11 39025 57.18 2.23 24.75 1.36 49.89 997727 1591<br />

MJNS<strong>in</strong>gh 152248 4 38062 53.50 2.06 21.25 2.56 43.38 867500 1791<br />

Mkarve 44553 1 44553 20.50 5.25 39.75 0.50 30.00 600000 1121<br />

Motilal Nehru 235226 5 47045 43.75 4.10 27.25 3.15 43.15 862920 1719<br />

NSBose 265514 6 44252 24.67 3.33 30.42 2.54 25.13 502500 1501<br />

NShivChand 94524 2 47262 101.0 1.75 23.00 3.00 92.75 1855000 2059<br />

Piru S<strong>in</strong>gh 317921 8 39740 54.34 3.63 24.25 2.31 49.56 991250 1641<br />

RN Tagore 245309 8 30664 56.84 1.94 20.43 2.63 47.49 949875 1497<br />

RRRane 315597 8 39450 49.09 2.63 24.28 3.41 43.41 868125 1642<br />

RatnaAbha 243489 6 40582 82.13 3.38 21.77 0.71 72.18 1443667 1881<br />

SSarma 342843 9 38094 45.53 5.03 22.60 0.83 39.43 788667 1684<br />

Saitan S<strong>in</strong>gh 269795 7 38542 33.32 2.21 25.93 1.32 28.39 567857 1485<br />

Satya Moorty 153235 3 51078 59.25 2.58 38.33 1.92 66.08 1321667 1346<br />

Vivekananda 239897 5 47979 48.20 3.30 39.25 0.81 55.56 1111200 1231<br />

216


6.3.3.6 The Simulation Model Experiments<br />

The computer simulation based model for model<strong>in</strong>g the crude tanker<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g operations at Kochi Port discussed <strong>in</strong> chapter 4 section 4.6.4 . This<br />

model forms the base of the Decision Support System (DSS) that provides for the<br />

"What if Analysis' for crude slate meet<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This model has been modified and used to study the effect of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the number of tankers that are brought to Kochi Port on the cost per ton for<br />

crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations. The performance measure called 'Cost per Ton for<br />

crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations', was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the formula given below:<br />

Cost per tone for crude unload<strong>in</strong>g = (Total Days spent by all<br />

ships that came to unload crude at Kochi port) x (24) x (Rs20000) /<br />

Total tonnage of crude unloaded<br />

Table 4.5 Relationship between ship hire costper ton and number ofships per month<br />

Number ofships Total ship hire cost Total ofCrude Cost pertonfor crude<br />

permonth for unload<strong>in</strong>g days tonnage unloaded unload<strong>in</strong>g<br />

8 7200000 360000 20<br />

9 8160000 405001 20.15<br />

10 8160000 450001 18.13<br />

11 9120000 495000 18.42<br />

12 11040000 540000 20.44<br />

13 12000000 540000 22.22<br />

14 16320000 585001 27.9<br />

15 24480000 585000 41.85<br />

16 32160000 585000 54.97<br />

17 39840000 585000 68.1<br />

18 47520000 585000 81.23<br />

19 55200000 585000 94.36<br />

20 62880000 585000 107.49<br />

21 69120000 585001 118.15<br />

22 75840000 585001 129.64<br />

23 85920000 585000 146.87<br />

24 93600000 585000 160<br />

25 99840000 585000 170.67<br />

26 108480000 585000 185.44<br />

27 109440000 630000 190.71<br />

28 118080000 585001 201.85<br />

29 125760000 585000 214.97<br />

30 137280000 585000 234.67<br />

218


6.3.3.7 Storage of Crude<br />

KRL has two tank farms for the storage of crude. The first is the old tank<br />

farm, which has 7 tanks for crude storage. The second and later addition is the<br />

Additional Crude Tankage Project (ACTP) that has 6 crude tanks. There is a 30<br />

<strong>in</strong>ches (<strong>in</strong>ternal dia 29.5 <strong>in</strong>ches) pipel<strong>in</strong>e from the Jetty to the Old tank farm. This<br />

crude l<strong>in</strong>e now extends to the ACTP. Therefore there is facility to receive crude<br />

from one tanker each berthed at either COT or NTB at a time. The other could<br />

meanwhile prepare for discharg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Crude from a vessel is usually received <strong>in</strong>to one tank and when it is full the<br />

connection is slowly switched over to another tank. The pipel<strong>in</strong>e connections <strong>in</strong><br />

the crude tank farms is <strong>in</strong> such a way that at any given time crude from two tanks<br />

with different crude can be separately charged to different units i.e., CDU 1 or<br />

CDU 2. But LSPG and BH from Group 2 cannot be separately charged to CDU 1<br />

and CDU 2 at the same time s<strong>in</strong>ce there is only one l<strong>in</strong>e for charg<strong>in</strong>g from Group<br />

2. One tank from each group can be <strong>in</strong>dependently charged to CDU 1 and CDU 2.<br />

Similarlyone tank form both the groups can be charged to both CDUl and CDU2<br />

simultaneously. At KRL, CDU 1 is usually run on Imported High Sulfur crude<br />

almost 40 % of the time. Rest of the time it runs on Imported Low Sulfur crude or<br />

on Bombay High crude depend<strong>in</strong>g on the requirements of heavy ends. Whereas,<br />

CDU 2 always runs on imported low sulfur crude or on Bombay High crude.<br />

6.3.3.8 Crude Arrival and Consumption<br />

The current pattern of crude arrival and consumption at KRL is discussed<br />

here. The data used is of 1998-99. A look at the figure 6.10 shows the monthly<br />

crude arrival pattern. It can be seen that crude arrivals were low <strong>in</strong> April, May<br />

and June. The low arrival from April to mid-May should not be allowed, that is<br />

the month when maximum pre-monsoon build up of stock should be done. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory hold<strong>in</strong>g cost can be reduced by postpon<strong>in</strong>g the crude stock build up to<br />

the last month, rather that build<strong>in</strong>g it up <strong>in</strong> February and March itself. Itcan also<br />

be seen that it is BH crude arrivals that undergo greater fluctuations.<br />

221


• Plant ma<strong>in</strong>tenance or shutdowns<br />

• Net back for different options<br />

Automation <strong>in</strong> the plant has been achieved to a great extent at KRL. The<br />

problem however is that these plant automation systems operate as separate<br />

islands and they do not have any l<strong>in</strong>k with the management <strong>in</strong>formation system.<br />

The management <strong>in</strong>formation system has to still rely on the figures reported from<br />

each unit on paper or by phone. This results <strong>in</strong> different versions of the same fact<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g reported, the authentication of which is a major trouble. It also gives<br />

opportunities for temporarily hid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>efficiencies. An Information system based<br />

on data collected from the <strong>in</strong>struments directly would serve the purpose of<br />

management better.<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g verified the sales to the market<strong>in</strong>g companies now the production<br />

and sales of different products <strong>in</strong> different months of a year can be studied and<br />

understand the seasonality <strong>in</strong> demand. The difference between production and<br />

sale are also noted to determ<strong>in</strong>e periods <strong>in</strong> which there are stock buildups and<br />

stock erosions. The figures 6.13 to 6.23 shows the variation of stock and sales<br />

40000<br />

30000 +-+ -<br />

:E 20000<br />

.S<br />

B 10000<br />

o<br />

·10000<br />

Figure 6.13 LPG Production and sales<br />

LPG Production and Sales<br />

_ Prod" _ Sale Difference<br />

6 7<br />

Month<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 1998-99. The l<strong>in</strong>e is used to show the difference between<br />

production and sales to represent stock build-up or erosion. The figure 6.13<br />

shows the Production and Sales of LPG dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 1998-99. It shows that<br />

the production and sale of LPG rema<strong>in</strong>s nearly equal <strong>in</strong> most months. Only <strong>in</strong><br />

March the sale was significantly more that production. The months of May and;<br />

June had low overall production that reflects <strong>in</strong> the production of LPG too. The<br />

production and sale of MS is shown <strong>in</strong> figure 6.14. The production <strong>in</strong> the month<br />

224


JP-5. the aviation fuel used by the defense also shows higher demand<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g monsoon. In its case the stock builds up and slow depletion can be clearly<br />

seen <strong>in</strong> figure 6.19.<br />

!i<br />

14 00<br />

120 0<br />

100 0 ... eoo<br />

-li<br />

S<br />

400<br />

200<br />

•<br />

· 200<br />

. 400<br />

· 60 0<br />

Figure 6.19 JP·5 Produ ction and sales<br />

Monlhtr JP ·5 Production 1"1S SII,<br />

The production and sale of LOO also varies very much from month to<br />

month. It is more <strong>in</strong> demand dur<strong>in</strong>g monsoon and w<strong>in</strong>ter. The high demand<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g February could be <strong>in</strong> anticipation of Price rise. In this case also stock is<br />

built up <strong>in</strong> a month and this is carried till it is consumed <strong>in</strong> a later month by<br />

excess demand.<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

41)00<br />

S • 2000<br />

5<br />

0<br />

·2000<br />

·4000<br />

Figure 6.20 LOO productIon andsales<br />

Monthly LOO Production In d Sail<br />

_ Prodn<br />

Month<br />

Figure 6.21 shows monthly production and demand of LSHS are unequal<br />

<strong>in</strong> most months lead<strong>in</strong>g to a build up or depletion of stock. The last quarter<br />

buy<strong>in</strong>g before the budget or <strong>in</strong>creased production for push<strong>in</strong>g the product <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the market before budget. The production and sale of Furnace Oil is much more<br />

stable. For this product the strategy seems to be to produce only what is required<br />

andthe requirement be<strong>in</strong>g stable this is easier. Whenever stock depletes due to<br />

over demand it is topped up <strong>in</strong> the next period by more production.<br />

227


25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

s 10000<br />


6.3.4.3 Despatch of Products<br />

Products are dispatched from the ref<strong>in</strong>ery by Pipel<strong>in</strong>es, Rail Wagons or<br />

Trucks. Products are also dispatched by sea <strong>in</strong> Tankers. In the sections below<br />

each one of these are separately presented.<br />

6.3.4.4 Despatch by coastal tankers<br />

KRL is located at a port town <strong>in</strong> the south of India. The location of KRL is<br />

ideal for gett<strong>in</strong>g crude supplies and for dispatch<strong>in</strong>g products by sea. The product<br />

demands are distributed throughout the country. For <strong>in</strong>land and local movement<br />

other means of transport have to be used. S<strong>in</strong>ce ship transport is most<br />

economical for bulk cargo movement, coastal tankers are used to move products<br />

to areas where there is greater demand. The major disadvantages associated with<br />

coastaltanker transfer of products are (i) tankers carry large parcel size rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from 25,000 T to 45,000 T of product. This necessitates build-up of more<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventories of products for mak<strong>in</strong>g use of this facility. There fore it may be noted<br />

that the amount of storage facility required for products moved by tankers willbe<br />

comparatively higher. (ii) The flexibility of cargo movement is severely<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ed by ports and the facilities they can provide.<br />

KRL has three product pipel<strong>in</strong>es from the Tank farm at the plant to the<br />

Jetty at Kochi Port. One of these l<strong>in</strong>es is used for black oil and the other two are<br />

used for white oil pump<strong>in</strong>g. The major products that are dispatched via tankers<br />

are HSD, Naphtha, MS, SKO, FO and LDO. Data was collected for monthly<br />

transfer of these products for 1998-99 and made separate graphs for each product.<br />

The purpose of this is to study the pattern of different product movement by this<br />

route. The graph below shows transfer of MS by tankers. From the figure 6.24 it<br />

was evident that around 20,000 to 30,000 Metric Tons (MT) of MS was sent every<br />

month by tankers. The graph regularly shows a zigzag shape mean<strong>in</strong>g that a<br />

30,000 month will be followed by a 20,000 parcel month, which will be followed<br />

by a 30,000 Tons MS parcel month and so on. The exception to this general rule is<br />

months that have very low production (possiblydue to shutdown). The graph that<br />

is presented <strong>in</strong> figure 6.24 is on monthly dispatch of Naphtha by tanker. The<br />

graph shows that Naphtha shipp<strong>in</strong>g by tanker is a regular affair with quantity<br />

231


In figure 6.24 shows the monthly dispatch of HSD by coastal tankers. The<br />

parcel size is seen to vary between 40,000 to 80,000 tons. However <strong>in</strong> some<br />

monsoon months this movement is nil. It was seen earlier that the storage<br />

capacity for HSD at KRL is low. Ifcoastal tanker movement is planned and there<br />

islate arrival of tanker KRL will have ullage problems. Therefore, monitor<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

tanker movement is very critical for operations. The next figure depicts the<br />

monthly dispatch of SKO by sea. Transfer can be seen to be higher dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

first half of the year. There is no SKO movement by sea dur<strong>in</strong>g monsoon months.<br />

The typical parcel sizes are 5,000 10,000 and 15,000 Tons. S<strong>in</strong>ce these parcel<br />

sizes are uneconomical for sea transport if done alone, product tankers com<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

takeother products should take this also.<br />

Figure 6.24 shows the monthly transfer of FO by sea. This can be seen to<br />

be more regular. Quantities between 20,000 tons and 30,000 tons are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

shipped <strong>in</strong> most months. This graph also shows monsoon does not have any<br />

effect of this pattern of shipp<strong>in</strong>g and also that <strong>in</strong> the second half of the year more<br />

quantity is shipped. The graph of LDO shipped given below shows that, small<br />

quantities of LDO rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1000 tons to 4000 tons is shipped this is to meet<br />

the bunker fuel requirements of tankers. The last graph <strong>in</strong> this series shows the<br />

total monthly product movement by sea. From this graph it is clear that <strong>in</strong> the<br />

first quarter of the year movement is much higher. April, May and June were<br />

months with very low transfer of products by sea. A maximum of 200,000 tons of<br />

products was dispatched by sea dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998-99. There is evidence of unutilized<br />

capacity for product movement from berth occupancy at STB and NTB.<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g this route of product movement though less expensive <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

freight will necessitate the augmentation of product storage facility to take care of<br />

slips <strong>in</strong> the large parcels that are planned by tankers.<br />

Recommendations<br />

Currently KRL does not <strong>in</strong>volveitself much with product tanker movement<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce OMCs take care of it. Tanker schedules for movement of products have to<br />

be watched closely s<strong>in</strong>ce, KRL does not have enough tankage to hold the large<br />

tanker parcels <strong>in</strong> stock for too long <strong>in</strong> case tankers do not come on time.<br />

233


6.3.4.5 Despatch by Wagons<br />

The largest share of the products produced is dispatched from KRL by<br />

railway wagons. At KRL the wagon load<strong>in</strong>g facility consists of four gantries where<br />

about 37 wagons each can be placed. Wagon load<strong>in</strong>g facility is used for the<br />

dispatch of MS, SKO, HSD, FO and LSHS only. The important steps <strong>in</strong> load<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

wagons are listed below.<br />

1. Vacancyposition of the wagon-load<strong>in</strong>g gantry is reported to lrumbanam yard,<br />

from where halfthe rake (nearly 37 wagons) is pushed <strong>in</strong>to the load<strong>in</strong>g gantry.<br />

The railways are given about 40 m<strong>in</strong>utes for this.<br />

2. The wagons brought have to be shunted properly with additional gaps<br />

between every three of four wagons, so that the fill<strong>in</strong>g arms are <strong>in</strong> correct<br />

position. This is required because the gantry was designed for a rake with the<br />

old type of coupl<strong>in</strong>g, which has been replaced by a new shorter one by the<br />

railways. This requires about 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes.<br />

3. After the wagons are placed IOC gives KRL the wagon load<strong>in</strong>g memo<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the wagon numbers, their capacity, the product to be loaded <strong>in</strong><br />

each with the quantity and dip required noted for each wagon.<br />

4. Based on this the KRL supervisor of wagon load<strong>in</strong>g prepares wagon-load<strong>in</strong>g<br />

lists to be given to the workers for fill<strong>in</strong>gof wagons.<br />

5. The workers then close the bottom and master valves of all wagons and start<br />

to fillthe wagons to the dip read<strong>in</strong>gs required, care is taken not to overfill.<br />

6. Once fill<strong>in</strong>g is over, the IOC and KRL personnel jo<strong>in</strong>tly <strong>in</strong>spect the wagons.<br />

Dip read<strong>in</strong>gs are taken and topp<strong>in</strong>g up is done wherever necessary. The fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pipes and bridges will then be removed and the wagons sealed.<br />

7. The railways are now <strong>in</strong>formed that wagons have been filled and are advised<br />

to remove the filled wagons. For this they are given 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes. The time<br />

allowed between placement of wagons and report<strong>in</strong>g to railways about fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

over is 300 m<strong>in</strong>utes. If KRL exceeds this an hourly demurrage of Rs.200 per<br />

wagon has to be paid by KRL to the railways.<br />

Recommendations<br />

There is need to <strong>in</strong>crease load<strong>in</strong>g of wagons. It was noted dur<strong>in</strong>g the study,<br />

that the operations at the wagon load<strong>in</strong>g yard has s<strong>in</strong>ce long fallen <strong>in</strong>to a very set<br />

pattern of work division between various shifts. Almost everyday operations take<br />

place <strong>in</strong> the same cycle; this convenient arrangement has resulted <strong>in</strong> a situation<br />

that it becomes difficult to improve s<strong>in</strong>ce, all have adapted to this system and<br />

therefore f<strong>in</strong>d the present system better. An <strong>in</strong>centive scheme to motivate<br />

personnel to break the old set pattern is one of the options that could be thought<br />

234


In order to understand the product portfolio dispatched by wagon and its<br />

seasonal variation, wagon dispatch data for 1998-99 was collected and analysed.<br />

The figure 6.25 shows the quantity of MS dispatched by wagons dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998-99.<br />

From the graph it can be seen that around 20,000 to 25,000 tons of MS is<br />

dispatched by railway wagons every month. These figures become lower only <strong>in</strong><br />

months when the production is lesser. The next graph presents the tonnage of<br />

SKO dispatched every month by wagons. This shows clear seasonal variation with<br />

two cycles. The quantity dispatched varies from 12,000 tons to 40,000 tons per<br />

month with highs around March and <strong>in</strong> July the lows are <strong>in</strong> June and November.<br />

The graph that is presented next is about the dispatch of HSD by wagons. This is<br />

without doubt the product that is handled <strong>in</strong> the largest quantity. The monthly<br />

dispatch of HSD ranges from 1,00,000 tons to 2,00,000 tons per month. There is<br />

seasonality to be seen here also with peaks <strong>in</strong> April and July. The graphs for<br />

transfer of FO and LSHS by wagons are given bellow. The quantity of FO<br />

dispatched varies from 2,000 to 6,000 tons while that of LSHS dispatched is<br />

higher and is between 2,000 and 10,000 tons.<br />

In order to show the total load of dispatch at wagon-load<strong>in</strong>g the graph<br />

show<strong>in</strong>g the total monthly product dispatch by rail from KRL is given. This<br />

clearly shows a tendency of peak<strong>in</strong>g towards mid year except that <strong>in</strong> May and<br />

June of 1998 when production was low the dispatch of products were also<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>gly lower.<br />

6.3.4.6 Despatch of Products by Road<br />

Almost all products produced at KRL are dispatched by the road route<br />

though <strong>in</strong> smaller quantities. The graphs show<strong>in</strong>g the dispatch of different<br />

products by road <strong>in</strong> 12 months of a year are shown <strong>in</strong> figure 6.26.<br />

236


Recommendations<br />

From the above study no bottle necks were identified at the truck load<strong>in</strong>g<br />

facility. This is shown by the low load<strong>in</strong>g bay occupancy and utilization figures.<br />

The bottleneck therefore, should be <strong>in</strong> the transaction part before or after<br />

load<strong>in</strong>g. KRL has already made most of the <strong>in</strong>vestment required <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up the<br />

new truck load<strong>in</strong>g facility. This has to be utilized well to <strong>in</strong>crease the return on<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments. The utilization of this facility is currently low because of procedural<br />

bottlenecks before and after load<strong>in</strong>g. Locat<strong>in</strong>g these bottlenecks and remov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them will be a challeng<strong>in</strong>g task for a manager. This will not require much <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of <strong>in</strong>vestment. Different agencies such as IOC, KRL security, and people at<br />

truck load<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>in</strong>volved. The complete process from natural arrivals of trucks<br />

<strong>in</strong> the park<strong>in</strong>g area to their fill<strong>in</strong>g and departure has to be studied <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong><br />

collaboration with IOC and the transaction process<strong>in</strong>g bottlenecks found and<br />

removed.<br />

In projects such as truck load<strong>in</strong>g the importance of facility design for<br />

better new operations is important. Designers concentrate on f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out what<br />

facilities will be required and <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g them available. The fact that these<br />

facilities are not <strong>in</strong>dependent of each other and that they will have to be str<strong>in</strong>ged<br />

together for smooth operations is many a time forgotten. The result be<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

the <strong>in</strong>creased difficulty <strong>in</strong> operation so created has to be borne throughout the life<br />

ofthe facility. Thus the operation cost that is recurr<strong>in</strong>g goes up or efficiency goes<br />

down do<strong>in</strong>g permanent damage. KRL is good at project selection evaluation and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>alization of contractors. But, then it seems people loose <strong>in</strong>terest and project<br />

implementation attracts less attention. The test<strong>in</strong>g and commission<strong>in</strong>g though a<br />

very important activity is not that well planned and executed. To highlight the<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t it can be discussed some issues related to the truck load<strong>in</strong>g facility that<br />

should have been solved at design stage itself.<br />

• The truck load<strong>in</strong>g control room is on the first floor requir<strong>in</strong>g truck drivers to<br />

come up and supervisors to go down often. The wait<strong>in</strong>g space on the first floor<br />

is also limited. The air condition<strong>in</strong>g requirement on the first floor is more. The<br />

view to the truck top from the first floor is obstructed s<strong>in</strong>ce the truck load<strong>in</strong>g<br />

244


gantry roof and other construction comes <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>e of sight. The view of the<br />

personnel on truck top is better from the ground floor. Hence locat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

control room <strong>in</strong> first floor does not help much.<br />

• The layout of the control room is such that the officers work<strong>in</strong>g there have to<br />

be constantly move around from one end of the room to the other result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

higher transaction time, fatigue and confusion. This could have been reduced<br />

bybetter facility design tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the operations <strong>in</strong>volved.<br />

The possibility of a new separate entrance for truck load<strong>in</strong>g is to be<br />

probed. This new entrance could be made, break<strong>in</strong>g the wall opposite the present<br />

truck park<strong>in</strong>g area. At present the number of trucks loaded every hour changes<br />

very much with time. If this is due to the non-availability of trucks that have<br />

come for load<strong>in</strong>g it is understandable, but this is not the case here. This uneven<br />

pattern is the result of the complex <strong>in</strong>teraction of IOC issu<strong>in</strong>g the load<strong>in</strong>g memo,<br />

security regulat<strong>in</strong>g the traffic and truck entry to KRL, familiarity of the drivers<br />

and helpers with the new truck load<strong>in</strong>g system, and the work<strong>in</strong>g pattern of<br />

personnel and officers at Truck load<strong>in</strong>g. Efforts have to be taken to have a more<br />

regular product load<strong>in</strong>g and dispatch pattern <strong>in</strong> place. Work-study will be helpful<br />

<strong>in</strong>identify<strong>in</strong>gthe bottleneck operation <strong>in</strong>volved here. The shift change over times<br />

can also be reduced with the new system. An attempt has been made to compare<br />

the handl<strong>in</strong>g loss figures or the periods previous to <strong>in</strong>stallation of mass flow<br />

meters and post <strong>in</strong>stallation to f<strong>in</strong>d if handl<strong>in</strong>g losses had reduced because of<br />

better measurement by mass flow meters. However, the comparison gave no<br />

conclusive evidence. This is believed to be so because of the lack of correctness of<br />

the reported figures.<br />

6.3.4.7 Pipel<strong>in</strong>e transfers<br />

Products such as LPG, MS, SKO, HSD, Naphtha, LSHS, FO and LDO are<br />

transferred to HOC and the depots of the OMCs by pipel<strong>in</strong>e. The volume of<br />

productstransferred by pipel<strong>in</strong>e is about one fourth of the total dispatch. In order<br />

to understand the product dispatch pattern. The product-wise monthly dispatch<br />

graphspresented below, for the year 1998-99 shall be looked <strong>in</strong>to next.<br />

245


tankers it was seen that R N Tagore, Iswari, Sravanan, BC Chattergi, and S Sarma<br />

are relatively more expensive and hence they should be avoided. A peculiar th<strong>in</strong>g<br />

noticedwas that all foreign crude tankers had lower than average discharge rates,<br />

this should be looked <strong>in</strong>to. Other SCI vessels with low discharge rates should also<br />

be avoided. The simulation experiments of crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations show that<br />

the cost of unload<strong>in</strong>g operations goes up l<strong>in</strong>early if more than sixteen tankers<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g crude every month.<br />

Crude tank <strong>in</strong>spection and repair takes a very long time lead<strong>in</strong>g to loss of<br />

tankage. The loss of tankage on this count is from one third to one fourth the total<br />

built up tankage. This will have to be reduced to improve tankage availability.<br />

The arrival of crude was such <strong>in</strong> most months, that one type of crude was there <strong>in</strong><br />

veryhigh quantity at a given time. A comfortable stock of BH, PG-HS and PG-LS<br />

crude was not steadily available throughout most months, limit<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

flexibility. The crude stock build up for monsoon was done too early, the months<br />

of March, April and Mayshould be used for it.<br />

It was found that ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is the strong po<strong>in</strong>t of KRL. Production and<br />

dispatch of most products are well aligned therefore <strong>in</strong>ventory build-up was not<br />

very high (this could be because KRL is forced to align production and dispatch<br />

because of low product storage facility available). The product tankage<br />

requirements for KRL are not sufficient for most products this is most critical for<br />

HSD. There is automatic tank gaug<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> place, now that was be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

utilized to a great extent. However, procedures many a time requires manual<br />

gaug<strong>in</strong>g to be still done, this should be reduced and manual gaug<strong>in</strong>g should only<br />

be done for calibration and accuracy check<strong>in</strong>g of tank gauges periodically. It was<br />

seen that wherever manual blend<strong>in</strong>g was done as <strong>in</strong> KRL only a few regular<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g options were tried out. This limits the ga<strong>in</strong> that could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g operations. Manual blend<strong>in</strong>g offl<strong>in</strong>e also requires more tankage for<br />

storage. The plan of KRL to go for on l<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g systems is a good step <strong>in</strong><br />

overcom<strong>in</strong>gthis problem.<br />

Product dispatch by tankers is crucial for KRL, late tanker arrivals will<br />

result <strong>in</strong> ullage problems, and forced reduction of ref<strong>in</strong>ery throughput. Hence<br />

KRL should more closely monitor product movement by tanker. A system of<br />

249


shar<strong>in</strong>g data regard<strong>in</strong>g product tank positions between OMCs and KRL can go a<br />

long way <strong>in</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g KRL to lessen the problems it has due to limited product<br />

tankage.<br />

The operations at wagon load<strong>in</strong>g need to be improved. With some<br />

streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g done the amount of products dispatched by this route can be<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased. The problem <strong>in</strong> this area are ma<strong>in</strong>ly Human Resource related. There is<br />

also the problem of bad wagons com<strong>in</strong>g for load<strong>in</strong>g that has to be sorted with the<br />

railwaysand a solution to the same found.<br />

The new truck load<strong>in</strong>g facility is currently underutilized because of process<br />

bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> the procedures before and after load<strong>in</strong>g. This has to be studied <strong>in</strong><br />

detail and measures to remove the bottlenecks found and implemented.<br />

The account<strong>in</strong>g departments face problems because they have to rely on<br />

figures of stock and sales reported by Stock and Oil Movement and Computer and<br />

Automation departments. These figures are often <strong>in</strong>consistent and require<br />

modification later. The need to re-key this data <strong>in</strong> different computers because of<br />

lack of an <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation system is a serious problem here. With changes<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g place so fast people need to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> areas such as International<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ance, Oil market operations and shipp<strong>in</strong>g and related rules to handle problems<br />

<strong>in</strong> these areas effectively.<br />

250


7.1 Introduction<br />

CH A PT ER VII<br />

Summary, Conclusion, and<br />

Scope for Further Work<br />

Objective of the research was to make a detailed study of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

management problems for a typical <strong>Indian</strong> ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Methodology used for the<br />

study was splitt<strong>in</strong>g the problem <strong>in</strong> to small modules of structured, semi<br />

structured, and unstructured parts and then f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g suitable solutions for the<br />

problem. All those solutions were implemented together with suitable l<strong>in</strong>kages to<br />

get the f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>tegrated supply cha<strong>in</strong> for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The methodology was suitable<br />

for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the solutions and it was established by the application to an exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Logistics of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is a complicated subsystem <strong>in</strong> its supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

This was studied <strong>in</strong> detail. The study was started at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of Government<br />

decontrol of petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustry. Complete decontrol is not yet over. So its impact<br />

is not yet completely clear to the <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

7.2 Summary<br />

Exist<strong>in</strong>g literature on SCM related to the present work was reviewed and is<br />

given <strong>in</strong> chapter two. It revealed the scope for SCM application for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Though many works had been carried out, an <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach was not found.<br />

Efficiency of SCM is on the <strong>in</strong>tegration of supply cha<strong>in</strong> operations. Present work<br />

is <strong>in</strong> the direction of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g all the operations us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.<br />

As per the literature, location is the most important factor for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery logistics.<br />

To identify a location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the knowledge on the petroleum ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g,<br />

quantity of crude oil available, transportation of crude oil, trade practices, place<br />

of availability of crude oil, place of consumption of crude oil and products, mode<br />

of transportation, pric<strong>in</strong>g mechanism, and methods of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g are essential. So<br />

the relevant practices and data were presented <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of chapter three.<br />

This gives an <strong>in</strong>sight to the supply cha<strong>in</strong> practices of petroleum ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

251


The data presented reveals the potential for further addition of ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g capacity.<br />

For add<strong>in</strong>g capacity the first step is identification of location for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. With<br />

that knowledge <strong>in</strong> trade practices, some locations could be identified all over the<br />

world for sett<strong>in</strong>g up a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The procedure for selection of location is given<br />

below. A method for select<strong>in</strong>g location for a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery was identified. All the<br />

locations identified were analysed for the suitability us<strong>in</strong>g a pass/fail criteria. At<br />

this stage, places which are evidently unsuitable were elim<strong>in</strong>ated. Then the<br />

logistic cost for each location was calculated for elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g with very high<br />

logistic cost. Then factors for selection of location were identified. A weightage<br />

table was developed for reduc<strong>in</strong>g the number of factors. Those selected factors<br />

were compared each other and relative score was awarded. Then a preference<br />

matrix was developed to f<strong>in</strong>d out weightages for each factor. Those weightages<br />

were used to compare the locations short listed. From the comparison a weighted<br />

score for each location was calculated and location with highest score was<br />

selected for start<strong>in</strong>g a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Once location is f<strong>in</strong>alized, flexibility and<br />

configuration plays important role <strong>in</strong> the performance of supply cha<strong>in</strong>. Flexibility<br />

is important because demand pattern changes among products, new products,<br />

etc. Areas that require flexibility were identified and the importance of each area<br />

was discussed. This is used while sett<strong>in</strong>g up a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery because flexibility<br />

gives more freedom <strong>in</strong> product pattern and product specifications. Product<br />

specification could be made flexible only through proper selection of technology.<br />

So the technologies available were analyzed along with their relative cost. A<br />

decision on location of ref<strong>in</strong>ery, flexibly required, and technology needed to give<br />

the required flexibilitycan f<strong>in</strong>alize the design of a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Major problem <strong>in</strong><br />

an exist<strong>in</strong>g ref<strong>in</strong>ery is related to plann<strong>in</strong>g. Next section discusses logistic<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g required for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Logisticproblem was divided <strong>in</strong> to two stages namely design and plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Areas, which can not be improved after <strong>in</strong>stallation, are design stage problems.<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g is done for both facility design and operation. For improv<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

effectiveness of plann<strong>in</strong>g, it was aga<strong>in</strong> sub-classified <strong>in</strong> to annual plan, roll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

plan, and daily plan. Decisions to be taken at each level were identified <strong>in</strong> the<br />

252


plan zone with respect to <strong>in</strong>bound logistics, <strong>in</strong>ternal logistics, and outbound<br />

logistics. A hierarchical plann<strong>in</strong>g model was developed for giv<strong>in</strong>g a clear picture<br />

of decisions to be taken at each stage. This will also give an idea about the source<br />

of <strong>in</strong>put data for plann<strong>in</strong>g. Source of <strong>in</strong>formation can be either from previous<br />

plan period or from outside the plann<strong>in</strong>g system. Model developed was helpful <strong>in</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the sequence <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g. Tools required for plann<strong>in</strong>g at each stage<br />

were identified and separated <strong>in</strong> to annual plann<strong>in</strong>g, short term plann<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

daily plann<strong>in</strong>g. These were given <strong>in</strong> table form for the easy reference. Demand<br />

forecast<strong>in</strong>g was the first stage <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g. Demand for ref<strong>in</strong>ed products was not<br />

the same every month. It was chang<strong>in</strong>g with seasons and socio-economic<br />

conditions. So a model was developed to make the forecast<strong>in</strong>g better and more<br />

reliable. In the model, consumption of products <strong>in</strong> the previous years was taken<br />

as the <strong>in</strong>put data. A six-step mode of demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g was developed for the<br />

implementation <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>gof forecast with all plann<strong>in</strong>g areas of supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> was essential for better plann<strong>in</strong>g. This six-step approach was help<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g it. Crude selection and purchase was another important function <strong>in</strong> a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Crude selection was made on the basis of product demand and facility<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> and outside the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Due to the l<strong>in</strong>ear nature of the problem a<br />

L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g Problem was formulated to solve the problem. Maximiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

netback is the objective function. Each ref<strong>in</strong>ery will have different set of<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts. An example of Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited (KRL) was taken for verify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the application and ga<strong>in</strong> of the models. Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude oil to the ref<strong>in</strong>ery was the<br />

next important function. This function had a number of variables like tide <strong>in</strong> the<br />

port, seasons, etc. A simulation model was developed for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g. The<br />

model gives the number of ships to be brought and their cost for br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude<br />

oil. This model was used as DSS for ship selection with m<strong>in</strong>imum demurrage<br />

payment to the shipp<strong>in</strong>g company. Internal logistics plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure was also<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> this section to reduce starv<strong>in</strong>g and block<strong>in</strong>g of facilities <strong>in</strong> the<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In a ref<strong>in</strong>ery, the facilities were tightly coupled so the freedom for<br />

flexibility was limited for logistic purposes. Modes of transport for product <strong>in</strong><br />

outbound logistics were also analyzed and a model was developed for select<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

mode of transport to a particular place for def<strong>in</strong>ite quantity and variety of<br />

253


products. These models will help <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g systematic plann<strong>in</strong>g procedure <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>bound, <strong>in</strong>ternal, and outbound logistics. Exponential smooth<strong>in</strong>g method used<br />

for calculat<strong>in</strong>g demand was found very appropriate and six-step method of<br />

demand forecast<strong>in</strong>g was useful for the <strong>in</strong>dustry. LPP used for crude oil selection<br />

was also found to be very useful for a stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Simulation model<br />

used for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g can be used as DSS. Allthese together make the <strong>in</strong>bound<br />

logistic activity of a ref<strong>in</strong>ery very strong. Application of <strong>in</strong>formation technology<br />

<strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery for the performance improvement <strong>in</strong> SCM is discussed <strong>in</strong> the next<br />

section.<br />

In a supply cha<strong>in</strong> management system there are three key components.<br />

They are <strong>in</strong>formation flow, material flow, and cash flow. Success of SCM is the<br />

systematic control of all these flows. Standard methods are there for improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

material flow. Better technologies are there for faster <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

use. Effective bank<strong>in</strong>g systems are there for faster transactions. But better<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g and control is required to reap the benefits of SCM systems. Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and control functions performed by logistic managers rely on quick and accurate<br />

relevant data. Build<strong>in</strong>g an Information System for data capture, storage, and use<br />

is the pre requisite of a good modern <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> System.<br />

Information technology is the backbone of <strong>in</strong>tegration of <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

Information shar<strong>in</strong>g can improve the productivity and reduce level of <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

at all stages. An efficient software system is required to support a well-designed<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> management system. The software system must have a very good<br />

data collection facility from the source of data as much as possible. S<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

data entry is the next stage if direct collection is not possible. Software system<br />

model must support all the functions <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery. The ma<strong>in</strong> functions <strong>in</strong> a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery are process control and monitor<strong>in</strong>g, operations management, and<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess management. Identified key features of software system must be there<br />

<strong>in</strong> the software to be f<strong>in</strong>alized. The strength and utility of any software system is<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tegration of all functions <strong>in</strong> a ref<strong>in</strong>ery. In other words dispens<strong>in</strong>g retail<br />

outlet to crude oil and chemical suppliers must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated through<br />

communication systems to improve the quality of service and reduce the work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

254


capital requirement. This will improve the profitability and competitiveness of a<br />

ref<strong>in</strong>ery. All the processes were subdivided <strong>in</strong> to small subgroups and<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation required and generated was analyzed. All those sub groups were<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>ed together to form an <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation flow model. This will provide<br />

reliable and fast <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g as well as for operations.<br />

Software available <strong>in</strong> the market was analyzed and a comparative study was<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded for tak<strong>in</strong>g a decision on selection of <strong>in</strong>formation system if a ref<strong>in</strong>ery is<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> buy<strong>in</strong>g one. All those tools developed and selected were used <strong>in</strong> a<br />

stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Results of the applications are given <strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />

All the logistics operations performed by Kochi Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Limited were<br />

analyzed and suggestions were given for improvement. It was started with the<br />

selection of crude oil and f<strong>in</strong>ished with the retailer out let. It was proved beyond<br />

doubt that crude handl<strong>in</strong>g operations, especially the limited crude pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

capacity was the most serious bottleneck at KRL. Four temporary solutions were<br />

suggested (i) use of drag reducers (ii) gett<strong>in</strong>g Suez-max tankers to br<strong>in</strong>g crude<br />

(iii) us<strong>in</strong>g the black oil pipel<strong>in</strong>e available to pump <strong>in</strong> crude when it is not <strong>in</strong> use<br />

for product movement. (iv) Install a booster pump <strong>in</strong> the crude l<strong>in</strong>e at the pit­<br />

head at the KRL tank farm. This will boost pressures from there and will take up<br />

the pressure needed to pump the crude <strong>in</strong>to the tanks. The permanent solution to<br />

this problem is the S<strong>in</strong>gle Po<strong>in</strong>t Moor<strong>in</strong>g system that KRL is currently exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />

From the past freight data for crude tankers it could be seen that R N Tagore,<br />

Iswari, Sravanan, BC Chattergi, and S Sarma were relatively more expensive<br />

ships and hence they should be avoided. A peculiar th<strong>in</strong>g noticed was that all<br />

foreign crude tankers had lower than average discharge rates, and this should be<br />

looked <strong>in</strong>to. Other SCI vessels with low discharge rates should also be avoided.<br />

The simulation experiments of crude unload<strong>in</strong>g operations show that the cost of<br />

unload<strong>in</strong>g operations goes up l<strong>in</strong>early if more than sixteen tankers br<strong>in</strong>g crude<br />

every month. Crude tank <strong>in</strong>spection and repair takes a very long time lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

loss of tankage. The loss of tankage on this account was from one third to one<br />

fourth of the total built up tankage. This have to be reduced to improve tankage<br />

availability. The arrival of crude was vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> most months, that one type of<br />

255


crude was there <strong>in</strong> very high quantity at a given time. A comfortable stock of BH,<br />

PG-HS and PG-LS crude was not steadily available throughout most of the<br />

months, limit<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>in</strong>g flexibility. The crude stock build up for monsoon was<br />

done too early, <strong>in</strong> the months of March, April and May. It was found that ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

was the strong po<strong>in</strong>t of KRL. The production and dispatch of most products were<br />

wellaligned that <strong>in</strong>ventory build-up was not very high (this could be because KRL<br />

was forced to align production and dispatch because of low product storage<br />

facility available). The product tankage requirements for KRL were not sufficient<br />

for most products. This was most critical for HSD. There was automatic tank<br />

gaug<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> place, which was be<strong>in</strong>g utilized to a great extent. However,<br />

procedures many a time requires manual gaug<strong>in</strong>g to be still done, this should be<br />

reduced and manual gaug<strong>in</strong>g should only be done for calibration and accuracy<br />

check<strong>in</strong>g of tank gauges periodically. It was known that wherever manual<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g was done as <strong>in</strong> KRL only a few regular blend<strong>in</strong>g options were tried out.<br />

This limits the ga<strong>in</strong> that could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from blend<strong>in</strong>g operations. Manual<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g offl<strong>in</strong>e also requires more tankage for storage. KRL must go for on l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> overcom<strong>in</strong>gthis problem.<br />

Product dispatch by tankers is crucial for KRL, late tanker arrivals result<br />

<strong>in</strong> ullage problems, and forced reduction of ref<strong>in</strong>ery throughput. Hence KRL<br />

should more closely monitor product movement by tanker. A system of shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data regard<strong>in</strong>g product tank positions between oil market<strong>in</strong>g companies and KRL<br />

can go a long way <strong>in</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g KRL to lessen the problems it has due to limited<br />

product tankage. The operations at wagon load<strong>in</strong>g need to be improved. With<br />

some streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, the amount of products dispatched by this route can be<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased. The problem <strong>in</strong> this area will be ma<strong>in</strong>ly HR. There is also the problem<br />

of bad wagons com<strong>in</strong>g for load<strong>in</strong>g that has to be sorted with the railways and a<br />

solution to the same must be found out. The new truck load<strong>in</strong>g facility is<br />

currently underutilized because of process bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> the procedures before<br />

and after load<strong>in</strong>g. This has to be studied <strong>in</strong> detail and measures to remove the<br />

bottlenecks must be found and implemented. The account<strong>in</strong>g department faces<br />

problems because they have to rely on figures of stock and sales reported by Stock<br />

256


and Oil Movement, and Computer and Automation departments. These figures<br />

are often <strong>in</strong>consistent and require modification later. The need to re-key this data<br />

<strong>in</strong> different computers because of lack of an <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation system, is a<br />

serious problem here. With changes tak<strong>in</strong>g place so fast people need to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> areas such as <strong>in</strong>ternational f<strong>in</strong>ance, Oil market operations, and shipp<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

related rules, to handle problems <strong>in</strong> these areas effectively.<br />

7.3 Limitations of the Work<br />

Data collection for the case study was ma<strong>in</strong>ly done <strong>in</strong> the time of<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism scenario. Changes can be expected <strong>in</strong> post<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istered Price Mechanism scenario. This will change the supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

system. Distillation process is automated <strong>in</strong> the ref<strong>in</strong>ery under study. So<br />

optimization of distillation is not attempted. In the ref<strong>in</strong>ery, blend<strong>in</strong>g of products<br />

is done <strong>in</strong> the storage tank. Onl<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g at the time of product delivery is<br />

suggested for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g product flexibility. In blend<strong>in</strong>g a lot of research had been<br />

carried out and standard practices are evolved. So no attempt is made to optimize<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g process. Method for solution to the location problem is derived through<br />

a sequence of calculations. The whole problem can be solved us<strong>in</strong>g a computer<br />

programme and it can be converted to a Decision Support System. It is not tried<br />

<strong>in</strong> this research. Flexibility for ref<strong>in</strong>ery is solved as sub-systems of the ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

Even though it is possible to quantify flexibility, it is not attempted <strong>in</strong> this<br />

research work and is one of the limitations of this work. Attempt to make it an<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated solution was also not done. Technologyoptions for a ref<strong>in</strong>ery are taken<br />

from the published literature only. A detailed survey of technology may give a<br />

better result and the cost for adopt<strong>in</strong>g technology also will be more realistic.<br />

Crude oil selection problem was solved by us<strong>in</strong>g data from a stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>ery.<br />

The ref<strong>in</strong>ery was not permitt<strong>in</strong>g to publish the actual data so realistic data is used<br />

to solve the problem. Multiple ref<strong>in</strong>eries also can be studied for formulat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

problem. In the simulation problem discrete arrival of ships were considered but<br />

<strong>in</strong> real life there can be cluster of ship arrival. Seasonality factors like monsoon<br />

are not considered <strong>in</strong> the simulation problem. <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> operations related<br />

257


studies have been related to a s<strong>in</strong>gle ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Market<strong>in</strong>g and distribution<br />

networks have not been studied.<br />

7.4 Conclusions of the Study<br />

Location of ref<strong>in</strong>ery has great importance <strong>in</strong> the SCM problem. Selection<br />

of location must consider many factors. So a model was developed for f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

the suitability of location with respect to a few other similar locations. This model<br />

will help <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>aliz<strong>in</strong>g the decision on location. Flexibility must be maximum to<br />

compete <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational market. Areas which require flexibility were<br />

identified and methods for provid<strong>in</strong>g flexibility were suggested to compete <strong>in</strong> the<br />

post APM scenario. Process selection was identified as one of the important<br />

factors <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up of a new ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Selection procedure and options available<br />

for selection as well as suitability of each process <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Indian</strong> context were also<br />

discussed.<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g was divided <strong>in</strong> to four time periods for improv<strong>in</strong>g the efficiency<br />

of plann<strong>in</strong>g. Plann<strong>in</strong>g started with the forecast of demand for products. A<br />

mathematical model was developed to improve the accuracy of forecast<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Product demand has bear<strong>in</strong>g on selection of crude oil and crude oil selection is<br />

based on many factors. So an LPP was developed for select<strong>in</strong>g crude oil so as to<br />

maximize netbacks. Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g crude oil to the port of unload<strong>in</strong>g is the next major<br />

bottleneck. A simulation based DSS was developed for ship schedul<strong>in</strong>g. The DSS<br />

will provide comparison of different ship schedules. Separate plann<strong>in</strong>g models<br />

for <strong>in</strong>bound logistic, <strong>in</strong>ternal logistic, and external logistics are also developed.<br />

Information technology be<strong>in</strong>g the backbone of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management,<br />

tools available for use <strong>in</strong> SCM as well as the suitability of each tool was discussed.<br />

An <strong>in</strong>formation system model for <strong>in</strong>tegrated ref<strong>in</strong>ery supply cha<strong>in</strong> management<br />

was presented. The whole system was divided <strong>in</strong> to small operational sub<br />

modules and <strong>in</strong>formation system for each sub module was developed. F<strong>in</strong>ally all<br />

the sub modules were jo<strong>in</strong>ed together to get the <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation model for<br />

258


SCM. A stand-alone ref<strong>in</strong>ery was selected for collect<strong>in</strong>g data for analyz<strong>in</strong>g each<br />

proposed model. A SWOT analysis was done <strong>in</strong> KRL to identify the strengths,<br />

weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for KRL. Important weaknesses were<br />

analyzed <strong>in</strong> detail. Inbound logistics and outbound logistics were found as week<br />

areas and suggestions for improvements were given. Information flow and cash<br />

flow were analyzed and some suggestions were given <strong>in</strong> this thesis. Results of<br />

analysis was very encourag<strong>in</strong>g and suggestions for improvement of operations of<br />

the ref<strong>in</strong>ery is also added <strong>in</strong> this research.<br />

7.5 Scope for Further Work<br />

The study was conducted <strong>in</strong> the time of APM dismantl<strong>in</strong>g. APM<br />

dismantl<strong>in</strong>g could not cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> the pace at which it was designed. So the full<br />

effect could not be taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> this study. When the APM is completely<br />

removed, similar study can be done <strong>in</strong> the future. Export possibility for products<br />

can be analyzed <strong>in</strong> detail after full APM dismantl<strong>in</strong>g. Development of software<br />

package can be made for the <strong>in</strong>tegrated model on SCM and it could be developed<br />

as a commercial package, which will be of great use to the petroleum ref<strong>in</strong>eries <strong>in</strong><br />

future for better performance. Scope of strategic supply cha<strong>in</strong> partnerships<br />

between crude oil suppliers, ref<strong>in</strong>ers, and marketers can all be studied s<strong>in</strong>ce they<br />

are possible <strong>in</strong> future. Exclusive studies related to possibilities and profits from<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> partnerships and profit shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such partnerships are very<br />

relevant. Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g type of study to improve supply cha<strong>in</strong> performance can<br />

also be done.<br />

259


References<br />

1. Agost<strong>in</strong>o Villa, 2001, Introduc<strong>in</strong>g Some <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Problems.<br />

International Journal of Production Economics, 73.<br />

2. Amundson S., 1998, Relationship Between Theory-Driven Empirical<br />

Research In Operations <strong>Management</strong> And Other Discipl<strong>in</strong>e. Journal of<br />

Operations <strong>Management</strong>, 16.<br />

3. Andrew Campbell, Maxcus Alexander, 1997, What Is Wrong With Strategy.<br />

Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, (November-December).<br />

4. Apple J.M., 1977, Plant Layout and Material Handl<strong>in</strong>g. John WHey & Sons,<br />

NewYork.<br />

5. Av<strong>in</strong> Y.A, Federgrues, 1998, The Operational Benefits Of Information<br />

Shar<strong>in</strong>g And Vendor Managed Inventory By Program. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

University.<br />

6. Back W. Edward, Laneford C. Bell,1996, Re-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Materials<br />

<strong>Management</strong>: Opportunities For Electronics Technology Implementation.<br />

Cost Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 38(2).<br />

7. Baker Y, S.A. Lippman, 1984, Technological Expectations AndAdoption Of<br />

Improve Technology. Journal of Economic Theory, 34.<br />

8. Ball<strong>in</strong>tg<strong>in</strong> K., 1993, Optimization In Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Schedul<strong>in</strong>g: Model<strong>in</strong>g And<br />

Solution. Optimization <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, 3, John WHey, New York.<br />

9. Barker K.R., 1974,Introduction ofSequenc<strong>in</strong>g and Schedul<strong>in</strong>g, John WHey,<br />

NewYork.<br />

10. Barney J.B., 1991, Firm ResourcesAnd Susta<strong>in</strong>ed Competitive Advantage.<br />

Journal of <strong>Management</strong>, 17(1).<br />

11. Beaman B.M., 1999, Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Performance. International<br />

Journal Of Operations and Production <strong>Management</strong>, 19(3).<br />

12. Bechtel, 1993, PIMS (Process Industry Model<strong>in</strong>g System). Users Manual<br />

260


Version, Housfon, TX Bechtel Corporation.<br />

13. Beckman M., 1968, Location Theory. Random house, New York.<br />

14. Beigel, 1974, Production control,A Quantitative Approach. Prentice Hall of<br />

India, Delhi.<br />

15. Bell E.L, and Stuckhart G., 1998, Attributes Of Material <strong>Management</strong><br />

System. Journal of Construction Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>Management</strong>, 112(1)<br />

16. Beth Schwartz., 2000. If You Th<strong>in</strong>k Gas Prices Are Bad, You Should See<br />

The Marg<strong>in</strong>s. Transportation and Distribution, 41(8).<br />

17. Bhasi M., Acharya D., 1997, Optimisation Of Large Mix For Ship<br />

Lighter<strong>in</strong>g Operations. Bulk Solids Handl<strong>in</strong>g, 17(2).<br />

18. Bhattacharya P., 1998, Clear<strong>in</strong>g The <strong>Supply</strong> Bottleneck. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess world,<br />

November-December.<br />

19. Blois KJ., 1980, The Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Orientations and Its Information<br />

Needs. European Journal of Market<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

20. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton C.E., Shobrys D.E., 1996, Optimize the <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>.<br />

Hydrocarbon process<strong>in</strong>g, 75(9).<br />

21. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton C.E., 1992, Inventory <strong>Management</strong> <strong>in</strong> Blend<strong>in</strong>g Optimization,<br />

Use Of Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear Optimization For Gasol<strong>in</strong>e Blend Plann<strong>in</strong>g And<br />

Schedul<strong>in</strong>g. In ORSA/TIMS Natural Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Sanfranscisco (CA).<br />

22. Bod<strong>in</strong>gton C.E., 1995, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Schedul<strong>in</strong>g and Control Integration <strong>in</strong> the<br />

ProcessIndustries. MC Graw thill, New york.<br />

23. Boulden James B., 1975, Computer-Assisted Plann<strong>in</strong>g System. Mc Graw<br />

Hill, New York.<br />

24. Bour Land K, S. Powell, D. Pyke., 1996, Exploit<strong>in</strong>g Timely Demand<br />

Information to Reduce Inventories. European Journal of Operations<br />

Research, 92.<br />

25. Bowersox D.J, Daugherty P.J., 1995, Logistics Paradigm: The Impact of<br />

Information Technology. Journal of bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 16(1).<br />

26. Bowersox D.J., 1997, Integrated <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>: A Strategic<br />

Imperative. In proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of Logistics management 1997<br />

261


annual conference, Chicago, IL, 5-8.<br />

27· Bowersox D.J., 1997, Lessons Learned from World Class Leaders. <strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Review, 1(1).<br />

28. Box G.E.P., Jank<strong>in</strong>s G.M., 1976, Time Series Analysis, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

Control. Golden-day, San Franscisco.<br />

29. Brately P, Fex RL., schrage., 1987, A Guide to Simulation, 2 nd Edition,<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-verlag, NewYork.<br />

30. Bridleman., 1997, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Make- To-Order World.<br />

Apics-The performance advantage, March.<br />

31. Broniarczyk S.M., J.W, Alba, 1994, The Role ofConsumers Institutions <strong>in</strong><br />

Interface Mak<strong>in</strong>g. Journal of Consumer Research, 21.<br />

32. Burbidge J.L., 1984, Automated Production Control with a Simulation<br />

Capability. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs oflFIP conference, WG 5-7, Copen Lage.<br />

33. Burges Rachel.,1998, Avoid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> failure: Lesson<br />

from Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Process Re-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. International Journal of Logistic<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, 9(2).<br />

34. Butfa KS, Sav<strong>in</strong> RK., 1993,Modern Production/Operations <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

John WHey and Sons, NewYork.<br />

35. C.Zipk<strong>in</strong>, 1999. Competitive and Co-Operative Inventory Policies <strong>in</strong> Three<br />

Stage <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>. <strong>Management</strong> Science,January.<br />

36. Cachon G., M. Fisher, 2000, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Inventory <strong>Management</strong> And<br />

The Value OfShared Information. <strong>Management</strong> of Science, 46.<br />

37. Carter J.R, Narasimhan R, 1996, Is Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Really Strategic?<br />

International Journal of Purchas<strong>in</strong>g and materials <strong>Management</strong>, 32.<br />

38. Cav<strong>in</strong>ato J.L.,1999, Total Cost Volume Model for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Competitiveness. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess logistics, 13(2).<br />

39. Chambers J.E, S.K. Mullick, D.D. Smith, 1974, An Executives Guide to<br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g. John WHey, NewYork.<br />

40. Chan Y.K, Huff S.C., 1998, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Strategies Orientation, Information<br />

System Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment.<br />

262


Information System Research, 8.<br />

41. Chen F, Dregner Z, Ryan J.K, Simchi-Levi D., 2000, Quantify<strong>in</strong>g The<br />

Bullwhip Effect <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>, The Impact ofRorecast<strong>in</strong>gs, Lead Time,<br />

and Information <strong>Management</strong>. <strong>Management</strong> Science, 46(3).<br />

42. Chen F., 1998, Echelon Reorder Po<strong>in</strong>t, Installation Reorder Po<strong>in</strong>tt.<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Science, 44.<br />

43. Chow G., Heaver T.D, Henriksson L.E., 1995, Strategy, Structure, and<br />

Performance: A Framework for Logistics Research. The logistics and<br />

Transportation Review.gifa),<br />

44. Christy D.P., H.J. Waston., 1983, The Application OfSimulation: A Survey<br />

OfIndustrial Practices. Interfaces.ig (5).<br />

45. Clark Wallace., 1992, The Gantt Chart, a Work<strong>in</strong>g Tool of<strong>Management</strong>.<br />

Ronald Press, New York.<br />

46. Cochan G., M. Fisher, 2002, SC Inventory <strong>Management</strong> And The Value Of<br />

Shared Information. <strong>Management</strong> Science, 42(6).<br />

47. Cochon G.P, Fisher M., 2000, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Inventory <strong>Management</strong> And<br />

The Value OfShared Information. <strong>Management</strong> Science, 40(8).<br />

48. Cooper M.C, Eliram L.M., 1993, Characteristics of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> and Implication for Purchas<strong>in</strong>g and Logistics Strategy.<br />

International Journal of Logistic <strong>Management</strong>, 4(2).<br />

49. Cooper M.C., lambert D.M., Paugh J.D., 1997, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>,<br />

More Than A New Ma<strong>in</strong> To Logistics. International Journal of Logistic<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, 8(1).<br />

50. Cox J., Adam F., 1980, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g An Integrated<br />

DSS. Simulation, (September).<br />

51. Cox Jt. T., 1989, Toward the Measurement ofManufactur<strong>in</strong>g Flexibility.<br />

Productions and <strong>in</strong>ventory management Journal, 2.<br />

52. Crawlord J.L, S<strong>in</strong>dair G.B., 1997, Computer Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Of Beer Tanker<br />

Deliveries. International Journal of Physical Distribution, 7(5).<br />

53. Davis Otto A, Frederick H. Rurter., 1973, A Simulation Of Municipal<br />

263


Zon<strong>in</strong>g Decisions. <strong>Management</strong> Science, 19(4).<br />

54. De Toni A, Tonchia A, 1998, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Flexibility, A Literature<br />

Review. International Journal of Production Research, 36.<br />

55. Decter Schneiz AR., 1997, Apply<strong>in</strong>g Team To Logistic Processes:<br />

Information Acquisition And The Impact Of Term Role Clarity And<br />

Norms. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 18(1).<br />

56. Devenport .H., Short J.E., 1990, The New Industrial Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Information Technology and Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Process Redesign. Sloan<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Review, 31<br />

57. Dewitt C.W, Lasdon L.S, Waren AD, Brenner D.A, Melhem S.A., 1989,<br />

OMEGA: An improved gasol<strong>in</strong>e blend<strong>in</strong>g systemfor Texaco. Interfaces, 19.<br />

58. Dieasli R., 1984, Functional Integration Is The Key To The Factory OfThe<br />

Future. Industrial Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, (September).<br />

59. Drezner Z., 1995, Facility Location - A survey ofApplication & Methods.<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, Berl<strong>in</strong>.<br />

60. Eiichi Tamguchi, Michihiko Noritake, Tadashs yamada, Fo ru Iznmifaus,<br />

1999, Optimal Size and Location, Plann<strong>in</strong>g ofPublic Logistic Term<strong>in</strong>als.<br />

Transportation research Part E, 35.<br />

61. Eisenhurdt K., 1989, Build<strong>in</strong>g Theories From Case Study Research.<br />

Academy of management review, 14(4), 532 - 550.<br />

62. Eliram L.M, Cooper M.C., 1990, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Partnership<br />

and the Shipper - Third Party Relationship. International Journal of<br />

Logistics <strong>Management</strong>, 1(2).<br />

63. Elizondo C., 1996, Network<strong>in</strong>g Your Firms Knowledge. Chemical<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, (April).<br />

64. Eric P. Jack, Amitabh Raturi, 2002, Sources of Volume Flexibility and<br />

Their Impact on Performance. Journal of Operations <strong>Management</strong>, 20.<br />

65. Eric P. Tack, Amitabh Ratur., 2002, Sources of Volume Flexibility and<br />

Their Impact on Performance. Journal of operations management, 20(5),<br />

519-548.<br />

264


66. Evans G.N., Na<strong>in</strong> M.M, Towill D.R., 1993, Assess<strong>in</strong>g the Impact of<br />

Information Systems on the Dynamics of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Performance.<br />

Logistics<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>Management</strong>. 6(25)<br />

67. Federgruen A, P. Zipk<strong>in</strong>, 1986, An Inventory Model With Limited<br />

Production Capacity and <strong>in</strong> Certa<strong>in</strong> Demands. Mathematics Operations<br />

Research, 11(2).<br />

68. Feitz<strong>in</strong>ger K, H.K. Lee, 1997, Mass Customization at Hewlett Packard The<br />

Power ofPostponement. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review 75(1).<br />

69. Fiegembanm A, Karnani A, 1991, Output Flexibility - A Competitive<br />

Advantage For Small Firms. Strategic <strong>Management</strong> of Journal, 12.<br />

70. Firth M., 1977, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Methods <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>Management</strong>. Edward<br />

Arnold, London.<br />

71. Fisher M., 1997, What is the Right SCfor Your Product. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Review 75(2)<br />

72. Fisher, Marshall L., 1997, What is Right <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>for Your Customer.<br />

Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, Mar-April, 1997.<br />

73. Ha<strong>in</strong>eken, 1997The <strong>in</strong>ternet, Forbes ,March 24, 58.<br />

74. Fordows, Kasra. 1997. Mak<strong>in</strong>g the Most of Forgive Factories Fortune.<br />

Mar-April.<br />

75. Foster RA, Ryan D.M., 1976, An Integer Programm<strong>in</strong>g Approach to the<br />

Vehicle Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Problem, Operation Research Quarterly, 27.<br />

76. Fourre James P., 1970, Quantitative Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Plann<strong>in</strong>g Technique.<br />

American <strong>Management</strong> Association INC, NewYork.<br />

77. Francis R.L, J.A White., 1974, Facility Layout and Location, AnAnalytical<br />

Approach. Prentice Hall Inc: Englewood- cliffs.<br />

78. Fredrickson J.W., 1986, The Strategic Decision Process and<br />

Organizational Structure, Academyof management Review, 11(2).<br />

79. Gallorna J.L., Norman H., and Day A., 1991, Pathway to Customers,<br />

Reduc<strong>in</strong>g Complexity <strong>in</strong> Logistics Pipel<strong>in</strong>e. International Journal of<br />

Physical distribution and Logistics <strong>Management</strong>, 21(8).<br />

265


80. Gallorna J.L., 1998, Strategic <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Alignment, Best Practives In<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>. Grower publish<strong>in</strong>g, Hamsphire, England.<br />

81. Ganble R.H., 1994, Curse of Consignment Sales: Carry<strong>in</strong>g Customers<br />

Inventory Weighs Down Cash Flow. Corporate cash Flow, 15(10).<br />

82. Garges X., 1994, The Flexibility OfProduction Processes, A General Frame<br />

Work. <strong>Management</strong> of Science,40.<br />

83. Garrod P, Miklirs W., 1985, The Optimal Ship Size, A Comment. Journal of<br />

Transport Economics Policy, 19(1).<br />

84. Gavirneni, 2002, Information Flows In Capasitated <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> With<br />

Fixed Order Cost. <strong>Management</strong> Science, March.<br />

85. Geoffro<strong>in</strong>, Arthur M., 1976, Better Distribution Plann<strong>in</strong>g With Computer<br />

Models. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, July - August.<br />

86. Gibbs G.!., 1974, Handbook Of Games And Simulation Exercises. Sage<br />

Publications, BeverlyHills, Calif.<br />

87. Gilmour P., 1999, Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Operations. International<br />

Journal of Physical distribution and Logistics<strong>Management</strong>, 5(4).<br />

88. Gurnani H, Tang C.S., 1999, Optimal Order<strong>in</strong>g Decisions With In Certa<strong>in</strong><br />

CostAndDemand Forecast Updat<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Management</strong> of Science, 45.<br />

89. Gust<strong>in</strong> C.M, Danghesty P.J, Stank T.P., 1995, The Effects OfInformation<br />

Availability On Logistics Integration. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics,16(1).<br />

90. Hamel, (1985), Do You Really Have A Global Strategy. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Review, July-August.<br />

91. Hanke J., 1989, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g In Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Schools: A follow-up Survey.<br />

International Journal of Forecast<strong>in</strong>g, 5(2).<br />

92. Hans H. H<strong>in</strong>terhuber, Woltgang Popp, 1992,Are You A Strategist Or JustA<br />

Manager? Hardward Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, Jan-February<br />

93. Harf Veld M., 1996, The Chemical Industry By Country-Brazil.<br />

Hydrocarbon process<strong>in</strong>g, 75(9).<br />

94. Harwick Tom, 1997, Optimal Decision Mak<strong>in</strong>g for the <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>.<br />

266


APICS-Performance Advantage, January.<br />

95. Hayuth Y., Pollatschek M.A., Rolley Y., 1994, Build<strong>in</strong>g A Port Simulator.<br />

Simulation, 63(3).<br />

96. Honlihan, John B., (1985), International <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

International Journal of physical Distribution and materials management,<br />

15(1).<br />

97. Houlihan J.B., 988, International <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>, A New Approach.<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Decisions, 23(3).<br />

98. Houlihan J.B., 1987, International <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Decisions 17(2).<br />

99. Huchzeraseier A., M.A. Cohen, 1998, Valu<strong>in</strong>g Operational Flexibility<br />

Under Exchange Rate Risk. Operations Research, 44(1).<br />

100. Humburg Morris, 1970,Statistical Analysisfor DecisionMak<strong>in</strong>g. Harcourt,<br />

Brace, New York.<br />

101. Immer J.R., 1950, Layout Plann<strong>in</strong>g Technique, M.C. Graw Hill Book<br />

Company, NewYork.<br />

102. Ioannis A. Papazoglon, Gerasims S. Bonanos, Zoe S. Nivolianiton, Niys Jan<br />

Dnijm, Brigitte Rasmussen., 2000, Support<strong>in</strong>g Decision Makers In Land<br />

Use Plann<strong>in</strong>g Around Chemical Sites Case Study Expansion Of An Oil<br />

Ref<strong>in</strong>ery. Journal of Hazardons Material, 71.<br />

103. J.Gorden Murray, 1998, Effect OfA Green Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Strategy. <strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 5(1).<br />

104. Jansen B., De Jong J.J., Roos C., Terlaky T., 1997, Sensitivity Analysis In<br />

L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g Just Be Careful, European Journal of Operations<br />

Research,101.<br />

105. Jansson J.O., Shneerson D., 1982, The Optimal Ship Size. Journal of<br />

Transport Economic Policy, 16(3).<br />

106. Johnson, (1995). Gam<strong>in</strong>g an Edge with <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

APICS-The performance advantage, December.<br />

107. Jones C., Clarke J., 1990, effectiveness Framework for <strong>Supply</strong>-<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

267


<strong>Management</strong>. Computer <strong>in</strong>tegrated manufactur<strong>in</strong>g systems. 3(4). 196­<br />

206.<br />

108. Jones T. C., Riley D.W., 1985, Us<strong>in</strong>g Inventory For Competitive Advantage<br />

Through <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>. International Journal of Physical<br />

Distribution and <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 15(5).<br />

109. Joseph B. Fuller, Ja<strong>in</strong>es O. Conor, Richard Rawl<strong>in</strong>son, 1993, Hired<br />

Logistics, The Next Advantage. Harward Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, (May - June).<br />

110. Karacapilidis N., Pappis C.P., 1997, A Framework For Group Decision<br />

Support Systems, Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g All Tools of OR Techniques, European<br />

Journal Operational Research, 103.<br />

111. Kefeng Xn, yau Dong, Philip T. Eves, 2001, Towards Better Co-Ord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

OfThe <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>,Transportation Research part E, 37.<br />

112. Khumawala, 1971, A Comparison Of Some Recent Warehouse Location<br />

Techniques. Logistics Review, 7(3).<br />

113. Klassen, 1994, Barriers To The <strong>Management</strong> OfInternational Operations.<br />

Journal of operations <strong>Management</strong>, 11(4).<br />

114. Kogut B., 1985, Design<strong>in</strong>g Global Strategies, Comparative And<br />

Competitive ValueAdded <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>s. Solon <strong>Management</strong> review.<br />

115. Konhdili E, Pantelides C.C., Sargent RW.H., 1993, A General Algorithm<br />

For Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Batch Operations. Computers & Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 17.<br />

116. Kopicld, RJ. 1999, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Investments In Develop<strong>in</strong>g Countries.<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Review, Sp<strong>in</strong>g 11(13)<br />

117. Kuchn, 1963, A Heuristics Program for Locat<strong>in</strong>g Warehouses.<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Science. 9(4)<br />

118. La Londe B.J., Masters J.M., 1994, Emerg<strong>in</strong>g Logistics Strategies:<br />

Bluepr<strong>in</strong>ts for the Next Century. International Journal of Physical<br />

Distribution and Logistics <strong>Management</strong>, 24(7).<br />

119. La Londe B.J., 1997, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, The Myth or Reality.<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> Review.<br />

120. Lambert D.M., Robeson J.F., Stork J.R, 1979, An Appraisal Of The<br />

268


Integrated Physical Distribution Manager Concept. International Journal<br />

of Physical Distribution And Material <strong>Management</strong>, 9(1).<br />

121. Lambert Douglas M.,1998, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Implementation<br />

Issues and Research Opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics<br />

Managemen, 9(2).<br />

122. Langley C.J., Jr. E. Halcomb M.C.,1992, Creat<strong>in</strong>g Logistic Customer value.<br />

Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics.igfz).<br />

123. Lamm<strong>in</strong>g R.S., Johsen T., Zheng J., Harland C., 2000, An Initial<br />

Classification Of<strong>Supply</strong> Networks. International Journal of Operations &<br />

Production <strong>Management</strong>, 20(6), 675 - 691.<br />

124. Law A.M., W.D. Ketton., 1991, Simulation Model<strong>in</strong>g and Analysis. 2 nd<br />

Edition, Mc Graw Hill, New York.<br />

125. Law A.M., Keton., 1990, Introduction to Discrete Event Simulation. Mc<br />

Graw Hill, Toronto, Canada., 1990.<br />

126. Lee H., P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., Forssmann LE., Park S., 1996, Mixed Integer L<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

Programm<strong>in</strong>g Model For Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Short Term Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Of Crude Oil<br />

Unload<strong>in</strong>g With Inventory <strong>Management</strong>. Industrial & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Chemistry Research, 35.<br />

127. Lee H.L., K. Monizader, 1987, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Re-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Through<br />

Information Shar<strong>in</strong>g. Work<strong>in</strong>g paper, Stanford University.<br />

128. Lee H.L., Bill<strong>in</strong>gton C., 1993, Material <strong>Management</strong> In Decentralized<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>s. Operations Research.<br />

129. Lee H.L., Bill<strong>in</strong>gton C., 1995, The evolution of<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

ModelsAndPracticeatHewlett - Packard. Interface 25(5), 42-63.<br />

130. Lee H.L., S. Whang, 2002, Information Shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>.<br />

International Journal of Technical <strong>Management</strong>, 20.<br />

131. Lee J. Kragewski, Larry P. Ritzman, 2002, Operations <strong>Management</strong><br />

Strategy &Analysis. Pearson Education, India.<br />

132. Lee L. Hau, V.Padmanabhan, Seunj<strong>in</strong> Whang, 1997, The Bullwhip Effect In<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>s. Solan <strong>Management</strong> Review (Spr<strong>in</strong>g), 93-110.<br />

269


133. Lee T.S., Adam E.E. (Jr)., 1986, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g Error Evaluation <strong>in</strong> MRP.<br />

Production Inventory System <strong>Management</strong> Science, 32(9).<br />

134. LeeT.S., (1992), Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Inventory: Pitfalls and<br />

Opportunities. Solan <strong>Management</strong> Review, Spr<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

135. Lenz RT., 1981, Determ<strong>in</strong>ants of Organizational Performance an<br />

Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary Review. Strategic <strong>Management</strong> Journal, 2.<br />

136. Lewis J.C., Na<strong>in</strong> M.M., Towill D.R., 1977, An Integrated Approach To<br />

Reeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Material And Logistics Control. International Journal of<br />

Physical distribution and logistics <strong>Management</strong>, 57(3-4)<br />

137. Lewis T., Talalayevsky A., 1997, Logistics And Information Technology A<br />

Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Perspective. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 18(1).<br />

138. Li-Hs<strong>in</strong>g Shih, 1997, Plann<strong>in</strong>g OfFuel CoalImports Us<strong>in</strong>g A Mixed Integer<br />

Programm<strong>in</strong>g Method. International Journal of production economics.<br />

139. L<strong>in</strong> Fu-Ren, Slaw M.J., 1998, Re-Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g The Order Fulfillment<br />

Process In <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Network. International Journal of flexible<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g systems, 10, 197-229.<br />

140. McCormek, 1994, The New Dynamics Of Global Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Site<br />

Location. Solan <strong>Management</strong> Reviewsummer.<br />

141. Macbeth D.K., Ferguson N., 1991, Strategic Aspects Of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong>. Integrated Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g System, 2(1), 8-12.<br />

142. Mand Gothe- Lundgren, Jan T. Lmdgren, Jan A pecsson., 2002, A<br />

Optimization Model For Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Production Schedul<strong>in</strong>g. International<br />

Journal of Production Economics, 78.<br />

143. Mansfield K.W., Maphet J.G., Ba<strong>in</strong> M.L., Boster W.H., Kennedy J.P., 1993,<br />

Gasol<strong>in</strong>e Blend<strong>in</strong>g With An Integrated On L<strong>in</strong>e Optimization, Schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

And Control System. Paper 406, AICHE, National spr<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Houston, Tx.<br />

144. Marien E.J., 2000, The F<strong>in</strong>er <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Enables. <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Review, 1(2).<br />

145. Mason-Jones R, Towill D.R, 1998, Time Compression In The <strong>Supply</strong><br />

270


<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Information <strong>Management</strong> In The Vital Ingredient. Logistics<br />

Information <strong>Management</strong>, 11(2).<br />

146. Mechmet Burnt, Wolfgang Faisst, John J. Kanet., 2002, Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Coupl<strong>in</strong>g And Information System Perspective. European Journal of<br />

Purchas<strong>in</strong>g & <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 8.<br />

147. Melters R., 1997, Quantify<strong>in</strong>g The Bullwip Effect In <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>. Journal<br />

ofOperations <strong>Management</strong>, 15.<br />

148. Mentzer J.T., 1993, Manag<strong>in</strong>g Channel Relations In The 21 st Century.<br />

Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 14(1).<br />

149. Meredith J., 1998, Build<strong>in</strong>g Operations <strong>Management</strong> Theory Through<br />

Case Studies And Field Research. Journal of Operations <strong>Management</strong>, 16,<br />

441-454·<br />

150. Michael E. Porter, 1996, What is strategy? Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review,<br />

(November-December)<br />

151. Miller D., 1987, Strategy Mak<strong>in</strong>g And Structure : Analysis And<br />

Implications For Performance. Academy of <strong>Management</strong> Journal, 30(1).<br />

152. Miller D., 1992, The Generic Strategy Trap. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Strategy,<br />

(January).<br />

153. Miller T.e., 2001, Hierarchical Operations And <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, London, U.K.<br />

154. M<strong>in</strong> H., Melachr<strong>in</strong>oudis E., 1999, The Relocation Of A Hybrid<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g/Distribution Facility From <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Perspective: A<br />

CaseStudy. International Journal of <strong>Management</strong> Science, 27.<br />

155. M<strong>in</strong> H., Mentzer J.T., 2000, The Role of Market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong>. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, 30(9).<br />

156. Mohan, 2000. E-commerce: An Imperative for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>. Industrial<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer Journal.<br />

157. Mo<strong>in</strong>zadeb K., P.K. Aggarwal, 1997, An Information Based Multi Echelon<br />

Inventory System With Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Orders. Operation Research, 3.<br />

271


158. Monfgomery J.P., 1972, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g and Time Series Analysis, Mc Graw<br />

Hill, New York.<br />

159. Morash E.A, Droge C., Vickery S.K., 1996, Strategic Logistics Capabilities<br />

For Competitive Advantage. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 13(2).<br />

160. Moro L.F.L., P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., 1998, A Mixed Integer Model For Short-Term<br />

Crude Schedul<strong>in</strong>g. AICHE Annual National meet<strong>in</strong>g, Paper 241 c, Miami<br />

Beach, FC.<br />

161. Moro L.F.L, Zan<strong>in</strong> AC, P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., 1998, A Plann<strong>in</strong>g Model For Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

Diesel Production. Computer &Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 22.<br />

162. Morten T. Hansen, 1999, What Is Your Strategy For Manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Knowledge? Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, March-April.<br />

163. Muller W., 1991, Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g competitive advantage through customer<br />

satisfaction. European <strong>Management</strong> Journal, 9(2).<br />

164. Narasimhan R, Curter J.R., 1998, L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Unit And Material<br />

Sourc<strong>in</strong>g Strategies. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Logistics, 19.<br />

165. Naylor T.H., 1966, Computer Simulation Techniques. John Wiley & Sons,<br />

New York.<br />

166. Nemetz P.C., Fry L.W., 1998, Flexible Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Organs. Academy of<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Review, 13.<br />

167. Noritake M., Kimura S., 1990, Optimum Allocation And Size OfSea Ports.<br />

Journal of water way, port, costal, and ocean Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, AS CE 116(2).<br />

168. Oral M., Dom<strong>in</strong>ique R.C., 1989, An Analytical Approach To Competitive<br />

Strategy Formulation In Nature Industries. lIE Transport, 21(3).<br />

169. Pagh J.D., Cooper M.C., 1998, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Postponement and Spemlation<br />

Strategies, How to Choose the Right Strategy. Journal of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Logistics, 19 (2).<br />

170. Papazolou LA, Briasonllis H., Bonanos G., 1999, Risk Informed Decision<br />

Mak<strong>in</strong>g In Land UsePlann<strong>in</strong>g. Journal of Risk Research.<br />

171. Parker K., 2000, Surviv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Web Based World. <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

management Review4(1).<br />

272


172. Pasqale Legato, R<strong>in</strong>a M. Mazza., 2001, Best Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Resources<br />

Optimization At A Conta<strong>in</strong>er Term<strong>in</strong>al Via Discrete Event Simulation.<br />

Simulation.igg,<br />

173. Patterson P., 1999, E-commerce. The busies wall streetjournal, 20.<br />

174. Paul D. Larson, Dale S. Rogers, 1998, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Def<strong>in</strong>ition Growth, and approaches. Journal of Market<strong>in</strong>g Theory and<br />

Practices, 6(4).<br />

175. Pelham R, Pharris C., 1996, Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Operation And Control, A Future<br />

Vision. Hydrocarbon process<strong>in</strong>g, 75(7).<br />

176. Peter Lorange, Richard F. Vannue., 1976, How To Design A Strategic<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g System. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, (September-October)<br />

177. Petri A. Jok<strong>in</strong>en, 1996, A Life-CycleApproach To Automation Information<br />

<strong>Management</strong> In The Process Industries. ISATransactions, 35.<br />

178. P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., Grossmann I.C., 1998, AssignmentAnd Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g Models For<br />

The Schedul<strong>in</strong>g OfChemical Process. Annals of operations Research, 81.<br />

179. P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., Grossmann I.C., 1994, Optimal Cycle Schedul<strong>in</strong>g OfMultistage<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Multi Product Plants. Computers and Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

18(9)·<br />

180. P<strong>in</strong>to J.M., Joly M., Moro L.F.L., 2000, Plann<strong>in</strong>g And Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Models<br />

For Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Operations. Computer and Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 24.<br />

181. Pope J.A., Talley W.K., 1988, Inventory Costs And Optimal Ship Size. The<br />

Logistic Transportation Review, (24).<br />

182. Porok S. Clang, Noh., 1987, Yong Doek: A Simulation Model For Bulk<br />

Cargo Operations. Simulation, 48(6).<br />

183. Porter M.E., 1980, Competitive Strategy, Techniques For Analyz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Industries And Competitors. Free Press, New York.<br />

184. Porter Michael E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage OfNations. Harvard<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, March-April.<br />

185. Raghuram. G., 1999, Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Materialfor Top management Programme<br />

for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Restructur<strong>in</strong>g. IIM, Ahemadabad<br />

273


186. Ram Ganeshan, Terry P. Harrison, 2001, An Introduction to <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong>. Rxy 112@silmaril. Smeal. Psu.edu.<br />

187. Ram narasimhan., S.O. Wook m<strong>in</strong>s, 2002, Effect of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Integration on the Relationship Between Diversification and Performance.<br />

Journal of Operations <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

188. Ravi V., Reddy P.J., 1998, Fuzzy L<strong>in</strong>ear Fractional Goal Programm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Applied To Ref<strong>in</strong>ery Operations Plann<strong>in</strong>g. Fuzzy sets and systems, 96.<br />

189. Rigby B., Lasdon L.S., Waren A.D., 1995, The Evolution Of Tex Aco's<br />

Blend<strong>in</strong>g System: From OMEGA To Star Blond. Interfaces, 25(5).<br />

190. Robert S. Kaplan, Dvaid P. Norton, 2000, Hav<strong>in</strong>g Trouble with Your<br />

Strategy? Then Map It. Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, September - October.<br />

191. Ronen D., 1986, Short Term Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Of Vessels For Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Bulk Or<br />

Semi-Bulk Commodities Orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g In A S<strong>in</strong>gle Area. Operations<br />

Research, 21.<br />

192. Ronen D., 1983, Cargo Ship Rout<strong>in</strong>g And Schedul<strong>in</strong>g Survey OfModels<br />

AndProblems. International Journal of Operations Research, 12.<br />

193. Ronen D., 1993, Ship Schedul<strong>in</strong>g The Last Decade. European Journal of<br />

Operations Research, 71.<br />

194. Ross, David F., (1996), Meet<strong>in</strong>g the Challenges of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong>. APICS-The Performance Advantage, September 1996.<br />

195. Rub<strong>in</strong> D.S., Wagner H.M., 1990, Shadow Prices: Tips And Traps For<br />

Managers AndInstructors. Interfaces, 20.<br />

196. S. Whand, 1998, Information Shar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>, work<strong>in</strong>g paper,<br />

Stanford University.<br />

197. Sahay B.S, V<strong>in</strong>ita S<strong>in</strong>gh, A.K. Gupta., 2001, Manag<strong>in</strong>g Customer<br />

Relationship, A framework for <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong> & CRM<br />

Integration. Productivity, 42(1).<br />

198. Sahay B.S. (Ed)., 1999, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, Mac Millan, India.<br />

199. Sahay B.S., 2001, Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> for Global Challenges:<br />

Strategies for Success. <strong>Management</strong> and Change, 5(1)<br />

274


200. Sah<strong>in</strong>idis N.V., Grossmann I.E., 1991, MINLP Model For Cyclic Multi<br />

Product Schedul<strong>in</strong>g on Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Parallel L<strong>in</strong>es. Computers & Chemical<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 15.<br />

201. Savoie, B.J., 1998, The Last World On <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Improvement. lIE solutions, October, 29-32.<br />

202. Schiber Thomas J., 1974, Simulation Us<strong>in</strong>g GPSS, Wiley, New York.<br />

203. Schruben, Lee W., 1995, Graphical Simulation AndModel<strong>in</strong>g AndAnalysis<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g SIGMA Or W<strong>in</strong>dows. International Thompson Publication, Toronto,<br />

Canada.<br />

204. Scott W.O., Leary-Kelly, Benito E. Flora, 2002, The Integration Of<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g And Market<strong>in</strong>g/Sales Decisions, Impact On Orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Performance. Journal of Operation <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

205. Shah N., 1996, Mathematical Programm<strong>in</strong>g Technique For Crude Oil<br />

Schedul<strong>in</strong>g. Computer & Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 20.<br />

206. Sr<strong>in</strong>ivasan K., Kekre S., Mukhopodhyay T., 1995, The Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Values Of<br />

Information Technology. A study of EDI, MIS quarterly, (June).<br />

207. Stevens G., 1989, Integrat<strong>in</strong>g The <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>. International Journal of<br />

Physical Distribution and Materials <strong>Management</strong>, 19(8), 3-8.<br />

208. Stock J.R., Lambert D.M., 1992, Becom<strong>in</strong>g A World Class Company With<br />

Logistics Service Quantity. The International Journal of Logistics<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, 3(1).<br />

209. Stuart I., Deckert P., Me Centchen D.M., Kunst R., 1998, Case Study A<br />

Leveraged Learn<strong>in</strong>g Network. Solan <strong>Management</strong> Review 39(4),81-93.<br />

210. Symonds G.H., 1995, L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g: The Solution Of Ref<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

Problems. ESSO standard oil company, New York.<br />

211. Theodore P. Stank, Patrick A. Traichal, 1998, Logistics Strategy,<br />

Organizational Design And Performance In A Cross-Border Environment.<br />

Logistics and Transportation Review, 34(1).<br />

212. Thomas Y. Choi, Ynnsook Hong, 2002, Unveil<strong>in</strong>g The Structure Of<strong>Supply</strong><br />

Network: Case Studies In Honda, Aaura, And Daimles Cheyster. Jim, 20<br />

275


213. Thonemann U.W., 2002, Improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong>-<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Performance By<br />

Shar<strong>in</strong>g Advance Demand Information. European Journal of Operational<br />

Research, 142.<br />

214. Towill, D.R, Del Vecchiw, A., 1994, The Application OfFilter Theory To<br />

The Study Of<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Dynamics. Production Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Control,<br />

5(1).<br />

215. Towill, D.R, 1991, <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Dynamics. International Journal of<br />

Computer Integrated Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, 4, 197-208.<br />

216. Tyndall G., Gopal C., Partsch W., Kamuff J., 1998, Super Charg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>s, New Ways Of Increas<strong>in</strong>g Value Through Global Operational<br />

Excellence. John WHey and Sons, New York.<br />

217. Tyndall, G.R, 2000, The Global <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> Challenge. <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Review, 13(15)<br />

218. Vau Hec K.M., WHbrands RJ., 1988, Decision Support System For<br />

Conta<strong>in</strong>er Term<strong>in</strong>al Plann<strong>in</strong>g. European Journal of Operations Research,<br />

34·<br />

219. Ward J.E., Wendell R.E., 1990, Approaches To Sensitivity Analysis In<br />

L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g. Operations Research, 27.<br />

220. Walton H.J., 1981, Computer Simulation <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess. John WHey & SODS,<br />

New York.<br />

221. Weber A., 1929, On The Location Of Industries. University of Chicago<br />

press, Chicago.<br />

222. Wheel Wright S.C., Makridakis S., 1985, Forecast<strong>in</strong>g methods for<br />

management, 4 th Edition, John WHey and sons, New York.<br />

223. WHekes M.J., Edema S., 1995, Select<strong>in</strong>g ship unloaders for <strong>Indian</strong> ports.<br />

Bulk Solids Handl<strong>in</strong>g, 16(4).<br />

224. Wisner J.D., Stanley L.L., 1999, Internal Relationship And Activities<br />

Associated With High Level Of Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Service Quality. The Journal of<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 35.<br />

276


225. Woglodekar P.H., and S. Sahu, 1986, A Critique Of Some Current Plant<br />

Layout Techniques. International Journal of Operations and Production<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, 6(1).<br />

226. Wu S.D., R.H. Storer, L.A. Mart<strong>in</strong>-Vega, 1999, Special Issue On<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Logistics: An Overview. lIE Transactions, 31(ii), 4-6.<br />

227. Xiande zhao, J<strong>in</strong>x<strong>in</strong>g Xie, Janny Leung, 2002, The Impact OfForecast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Models Selection On The Value OfInformation Shar<strong>in</strong>g In A <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Cha<strong>in</strong></strong>.<br />

European Journal of Operational Research, 142.<br />

228. Xucya Z., Sargent R.W.H., 1996, The Optimal Operation Of Mixed<br />

Production Facilities. Computer & Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 20(6).<br />

229. Yonng S., 1991, Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Strategy As A Competitive Weapon.<br />

International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics management,<br />

21 (8).<br />

230. Yum W.Y., Choi Y.S., 1999, A Simulation Model For Conta<strong>in</strong>er Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Operation. Journal of Production Economics, 59.<br />

231. Zahara S.A., Cov<strong>in</strong> J.G., 1993, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Strategy, Technology Policy And<br />

Firm Performance. Strategic <strong>Management</strong> Journal.<br />

Web sites referred<br />

1. Alan Greenspan, The grow<strong>in</strong>g role of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management III the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated enterprise, www.rmg.se/pages/RMD<br />

2. Lisa A. Robert, Understand<strong>in</strong>g your supply cha<strong>in</strong>, www.iipuk.co.uk<br />

3. Charles X. Wang, A taxonomic review of supply cha<strong>in</strong> management research,<br />

www.l<strong>in</strong>do.com<br />

4. Erik Manley, <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management and ERP, www.unstats.com<br />

5. Bill Helm<strong>in</strong>g, Jan Paul Zonnenberg, The five fulcrum po<strong>in</strong>ts of a supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

strategy, www.petroleum.com<br />

6. Gartner, <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> management software, www.kluweracademic.com<br />

7. www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil/petroleurn/analysispublication/oilmarketbasics.This<br />

site was extensively used for the preparation of basic material <strong>in</strong> chapter Ill.<br />

277


List of Publications<br />

Kemthose P.Paul, M.Bhasi, 2001. A simulation based DSS for selection ofcrude<br />

oil, International conference on logistics and SCM.<br />

Kemthose P.Paul, M.Bhasi, 2002. Inbound logistic strategy for an oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery,<br />

VI annual conference of the society of Operations <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

Kemthose P.Paul, M.Bhasi,2003. Improv<strong>in</strong>g truck load<strong>in</strong>g yard operations <strong>in</strong> an<br />

oil ref<strong>in</strong>ery, National Conference on World Class Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

RSasikumar, Kemthose P Paul.M'Bhasi.zoog. Crude Tanker Selectionfor<br />

Efficient UseofOil Term<strong>in</strong>al Us<strong>in</strong>g Simulation, VI Conference of the Association<br />

of Asian-Pacific Operational Research Societies (APORS) on "Operations<br />

Research: Emerg<strong>in</strong>g Paradigms for Information Technology"(Accepted paper)<br />

278

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!