04.08.2013 Views

Betti numbers of modules over Noetherian rings with ... - IPM

Betti numbers of modules over Noetherian rings with ... - IPM

Betti numbers of modules over Noetherian rings with ... - IPM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3: Growth <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Betti</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> the canonical module 50<br />

Lemma 3.4.1. Let J be an ideal <strong>of</strong> R generated by a regular sequence f1, · · · , fn and<br />

let I be an ideal containing J. Then for j ≥ 0<br />

1. Ext j<br />

R (R/J, R/I) ∼ = (R/I) (nj)<br />

.<br />

2. Tor R j (R/J, R/I) ∼ = (R/I) (nj)<br />

.<br />

3. More generally, Ext j<br />

R (R/J, N) ∼ = N (nj)<br />

R<br />

and Torj (R/J, N) ∼ = N (nj)<br />

for each R-<br />

module N which is killed by J.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. (1) & (2) Since J is generated by a regular sequence we may use the Koszul<br />

complex K•(f1, · · · , fn; R) as a free resolution <strong>of</strong> R/J : if U1, · · · , Un is a basis for the<br />

free module in degree one such that Uj maps to fj, then the elements Ui1∧· · ·∧Uij such<br />

that i1 < · · · < ij are a free basis for the free R-module Kj = Kj(f1, · · · , fn; R). Since<br />

I contains J, when we apply HomR(−, R/I) (resp. − ⊗R R/I) to K•, the maps in the<br />

complex all become 0, and the jth module may be identified <strong>with</strong> HomR(Kj, R/I) ∼ =<br />

HomR(Kj, R/J) ⊗R R/I (resp. Kj ⊗R R/I ∼ = (Kj ⊗R R/J) ⊗R R/I). We may take as<br />

an (R/I)-free basis the image <strong>of</strong> the basis for HomR(Kj, R/I) (resp. (Kj ⊗R R/I)). In<br />

particular, Ext 1 R(R/J, R/I) ∼ = (R/I) n (resp. Tor R 1 (R/J, R/I) ∼ = (R/I) n ). The same<br />

idea works for higher Ext and Tor <strong>modules</strong>.<br />

(3) The idea is essentially the same. Replace R/I by any R-module N which<br />

is killed by J. Then we get Ext j<br />

R (R/J, N) ∼ = N (nj)<br />

∼ j<br />

= ExtR (R/J, R/J) ⊗R N and<br />

Tor R j (R/J, N) ∼ = N (nj)<br />

∼ R<br />

= Torj (R/J, R/J) ⊗R N as well.<br />

The formulation <strong>of</strong> case (‡†) is given in the following:<br />

Theorem 3.4.2. Let R be a local ring and let M be a non zero R-module for which<br />

0 → (R/I) a → M → (R/J) b → 0 is an exact sequence where J is an ideal <strong>of</strong> R<br />

generated by a regular sequence f1, · · · , fn and let I ⊇ J. Let t be an integer.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!