Lithostratigraphical framework for Carboniferous successions of ...
Lithostratigraphical framework for Carboniferous successions of ...
Lithostratigraphical framework for Carboniferous successions of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The group is thickest, up to 1350 m, within the central<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the Northumberland Trough. Here, the Lyne<br />
Formation is at least 890 m thick. The Fell sandstone<br />
Formation ranges from 130 to 300 m in the north-east <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Northumberland Trough and from 300 to 450 m thick in the<br />
central part <strong>of</strong> the trough.<br />
The base <strong>of</strong> the group is not proved within the central part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Northumberland Trough. in the north-east <strong>of</strong> the<br />
trough, where the Lyne Formation is absent, the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />
group is an uncon<strong>for</strong>mity at the base <strong>of</strong> the Fell sandstone.<br />
within the central part <strong>of</strong> the trough, the base <strong>of</strong> the Fell<br />
sandstone is con<strong>for</strong>mable, defined at the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />
whitberry Band. Here, the top <strong>of</strong> the group is defined at the<br />
base <strong>of</strong> the Clattering Band.<br />
The Lyne Formation comprises cyclical sequences <strong>of</strong><br />
fine-grained subarkosic sandstone, siltstone, mudstone and<br />
thin limestone. The limestones commonly contain<br />
stromatolites and vermetid gastropod bioherms and<br />
biostromes.<br />
The Fell sandstone Formation present in the north-east <strong>of</strong><br />
the Northumberland Trough comprises fine- to mediumgrained,<br />
mica-poor, subarkosic sandstone with sparse<br />
interbeds <strong>of</strong> red mudstone (smith, 1967). This passes,<br />
toward the central part <strong>of</strong> the trough, into a continuation <strong>of</strong><br />
the cyclical succession present in the underlying Lyne<br />
Formation, although in the Fell sandstone the sandstones<br />
are thicker and limestones thinner (day et al., 1970).<br />
seatearths are common, but are associated with thin coals<br />
only in the upper part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation.<br />
The Lyne Formation limestones are typically peritidal,<br />
with the first incoming <strong>of</strong> marine limestones occurring later<br />
and towards the north-east <strong>of</strong> the Northumberland Trough.<br />
The Lyne Formation sandstones were deposited from lobate<br />
deltas that migrated periodically along the basin axis from<br />
north-east to south-west (Leeder, 1974). a second source <strong>of</strong><br />
clastics within the <strong>for</strong>mation is associated with the whita<br />
sandstone, present in the northern part <strong>of</strong> the trough and<br />
associated with a local source from the southern uplands<br />
High. The Fell sandstone is interpreted as deposits from<br />
both low-gradient meandering rivers and high-gradient<br />
braided perennial rivers, which occupied channel belts<br />
several kilometres wide along the axial part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Northumberland Trough (Hodgson, 1978). The Fell<br />
sandstone succession in the central part <strong>of</strong> the trough<br />
represents deposition in a mixed fluviodeltaic and shallow<br />
marine environment.<br />
The Lyne Formation contains strata <strong>of</strong> late Tournaisian to<br />
Chadian age. deposition <strong>of</strong> the Fell sandstone Formation<br />
occurred earliest in the north-east <strong>of</strong> the Northumberland<br />
Trough (Chadian to Holkerian). in the central part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
trough, the equivalent strata are <strong>of</strong> arundian to Holkerian<br />
age.<br />
5.4 GREAT SCAR LIMESTONE GROUP<br />
The Great scar Limestone Group (Plat<strong>for</strong>m and ramp<br />
carbonate facies) has a widespread distribution that includes<br />
south Cumbria, askrigg Block (the type area), stainmore<br />
Trough, alston Block and Lake district Block (Figure 6).<br />
Historically, the thick limestone succession has been<br />
named, at least in part, as Great scar Limestone. This name<br />
was <strong>for</strong>malised as a group on the askrigg Block by George<br />
et al. (1976). These authors recognised the equivalent strata<br />
in stainmore as the Orton Group and overlying alston<br />
Group. in west Cumbria, the limestone succession was<br />
known as the Chief Limestone Group. The stratigraphical<br />
18<br />
Framework Committee considered that a unified group name<br />
<strong>for</strong> the lith<strong>of</strong>acies across northern england would improve<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the relationships <strong>of</strong> these carbonate<br />
plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>successions</strong>. Historical precedent, and continued<br />
common use <strong>of</strong> the term, suggested that Great scar Limestone<br />
Group was most suitable.<br />
The Great scar Limestone Group includes many<br />
<strong>for</strong>mations, with a distinct <strong>for</strong>mational nomenclature <strong>for</strong> the<br />
isolated horst and tilt-block highs.<br />
Alston Block melmerby scar Limestone Formation<br />
(dunham, 1990).<br />
stAinmore trough Coldbeck Limestone, scandal Beck<br />
Limestone, Brownber, Breakyneck scar Limestone, ashfell<br />
sandstone, ashfell Limestone, potts Beck Limestone and<br />
Knipe scar Limestone <strong>for</strong>mations (dunham and wilson,<br />
1985).<br />
Askrigg Block Tom Cr<strong>of</strong>t Limestone, ashfell sandstone,<br />
Fawes wood Limestone, Garsdale Limestone, danny Bridge<br />
Limestone, Kilnsey Limestone and malham <strong>for</strong>mations<br />
(dunham and wilson, 1985).<br />
south cumBriA martin Limestone, Red Hill Limestone,<br />
dalton, park Limestone and urswick Limestone <strong>for</strong>mations<br />
(Rose and dunham, 1977; Johnson et al., 2001).<br />
north cumBriA Frizington Limestone and eskett<br />
Limestone <strong>for</strong>mations.<br />
The Great scar Limestone Group is thickest, about 800 m,<br />
in the stainmore Trough. in south Cumbria it is about 740 m<br />
thick and in west Cumbria about 190 m. The group is about<br />
400 m thick on the askrigg Block and up to 107 m thick on<br />
the alston Block.<br />
in the stainmore Trough the base <strong>of</strong> the group, taken at<br />
the top <strong>of</strong> the algal Nodular Beds, is con<strong>for</strong>mable upon the<br />
Ravenstonedale Group. a discon<strong>for</strong>mity occurs at the base<br />
<strong>of</strong> the group on the askrigg Block, marking a low sea-level<br />
stand at the base <strong>of</strong> the arundian Tom Cr<strong>of</strong>t Limestone<br />
Formation. This is also evident as an uncon<strong>for</strong>mity present<br />
at the base <strong>of</strong> the Breakyneck scar Limestone Formation,<br />
within stainmore Trough, and the base <strong>of</strong> the Red Hill<br />
Formation in south Cumbria. On the alston Block, the<br />
uncon<strong>for</strong>mable base <strong>of</strong> the group rests upon conglomerates<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Ravenstonedale Group. in west Cumbria, the base <strong>of</strong><br />
the Great scar Limestone Group rests discon<strong>for</strong>mably upon<br />
Tournaisian conglomerates <strong>of</strong> the marsett Formation. in<br />
north and west Cumbria, the bases <strong>of</strong> the Frizington<br />
Limestone and eskett Limestone <strong>for</strong>mations are marked by<br />
discon<strong>for</strong>maties with non-deposition during Chadian to<br />
arundian and late Holkerian to early asbian times,<br />
respectively.<br />
The succession comprises limestone, typically well<br />
washed, bioclastic, highly bioturbated with crinoid banks,<br />
shelly or coral biostromes and algal (Girvanella) bands. The<br />
group, common with other visean plat<strong>for</strong>m areas in the<br />
British isles, shows a trend from dark grey carbonates <strong>of</strong><br />
arundian to Holkerian age to pale grey limestones <strong>of</strong> asbian<br />
to Brigantian age, with eight major palaeokarstic bedding<br />
surfaces overlain by thin mudstones (waltham, 1971). in the<br />
stainmore Trough the limestone succession includes<br />
numerous intercalated sandstone beds. From late Holkerian<br />
to early Brigantian times, apron knoll reefs developed along<br />
the southern margin <strong>of</strong> the askrigg Block.<br />
The lower, mostly Tournaisian to Chadian, part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
group present in the stainmore Trough (Coldbeck Limestone)<br />
and south Cumbria (martin Limestone Formation) were<br />
deposited in a carbonate-dominated, nearshore to peritidal,<br />
restricted marine environment with common stromatolites<br />
and oncolites. Younger strata, dominated by thick bioclastic<br />
limestones, were deposited in an open, shallow marine