05.08.2013 Views

U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress - Foreign Press ...

U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress - Foreign Press ...

U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress - Foreign Press ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary<br />

<strong>Congress</strong>ional Research Service<br />

U.S.-<strong>China</strong> <strong>Military</strong> <strong>Contacts</strong>: <strong>Issues</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Congress</strong><br />

This CRS report, updated as warranted, discusses policy issues regarding military-to-military<br />

(mil-to-mil) contacts with the People’s Republic of <strong>China</strong> (PRC) and provides a record of major<br />

contacts and crises since 1993. The United States suspended military contacts with <strong>China</strong> and<br />

imposed sanctions on arms sales in response to the Tiananmen Crackdown in 1989. In 1993, the<br />

Clinton Administration re-engaged with the top PRC leadership, including <strong>China</strong>’s military, the<br />

People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Renewed military exchanges with the PLA have not regained<br />

the closeness reached in the 1980s, when U.S.-PRC strategic cooperation against the Soviet<br />

Union included U.S. arms sales to <strong>China</strong>. Improvements and deteriorations in overall bilateral<br />

relations have affected military contacts, which were close in 1997-1998 and 2000, but marred by<br />

the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, mistaken NATO bombing of a PRC embassy in 1999, the EP-<br />

3 aircraft collision crisis in 2001, and aggressive maritime confrontations (including in 2009).<br />

<strong>Issues</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> include whether the Obama Administration has complied with legislation<br />

overseeing dealings with the PLA and pursued contacts with the PLA that advance a prioritized<br />

set of U.S. security interests, especially the operational safety of U.S. military personnel.<br />

Oversight legislation includes the <strong>Foreign</strong> Relations Authorization Act <strong>for</strong> FY1990-FY1991 (P.L.<br />

101-246) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) <strong>for</strong> FY2000 (P.L. 106-65). Skeptics<br />

and proponents of military exchanges with the PRC have debated whether the contacts have<br />

achieved results in U.S. objectives and whether the contacts have contributed to the PLA’s<br />

warfighting capabilities that might harm U.S. security interests. Some have argued about whether<br />

the value that U.S. officials place on the contacts overly extends leverage to the PLA. Some<br />

believe talks can serve U.S. interests that include conflict avoidance/crisis management; militarycivilian<br />

coordination; transparency and reciprocity; tension reduction over Taiwan; weapons<br />

nonproliferation; nuclear/missile/space/cyber talks; counterterrorism; and POW/MIA accounting.<br />

In 2010 and 2011, the PLA criticized U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and claimed to “suspend” U.S.-<br />

PRC military contacts. Then, in 2011, the PLA hosted the Defense Secretary in January, and the<br />

PLA Chief of General Staff visited in May. In May 2012, General Liang Guanglie visited as the<br />

first PRC Defense Minister to do so since 2003. Defense Secretary Panetta visited in September<br />

and invited the PLA Navy to participate in the U.S.-led maritime exercise, RIMPAC, in 2014. The<br />

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, plans to visit in April.<br />

Policymakers could review the approach to mil-to-mil contacts, given concerns about crises. U.S.<br />

officials have faced challenges in cooperation from the PLA. The PLA has tried to use its<br />

suspensions of exchanges while blaming U.S. “obstacles” (including arms sales to Taiwan, legal<br />

restrictions on contacts, and the Pentagon’s reports to <strong>Congress</strong> on the PLA). The PRC’s<br />

harassment of U.S. surveillance ships (in 2009) and increasing assertiveness in maritime areas<br />

have shown the limits to mil-to-mil talks and PLA restraint. Still, at the Strategic and Economic<br />

Dialogue (S&ED) in July 2009, President Obama called <strong>for</strong> military contacts to diminish disputes<br />

with <strong>China</strong>. The U.S. military seeks to expand cooperation with the PLA. The NDAA <strong>for</strong> FY2010<br />

(P.L. 111-84) amended P.L. 106-65 <strong>for</strong> the annual report on PRC military power to expand the<br />

focus to security developments involving the PRC, add cooperative elements, and fold in another<br />

report on mil-to-mil contacts. However, the Administration was late in submitting this report in<br />

2010, 2011, and 2012. The NDAA <strong>for</strong> FY2013 (P.L. 112-239) adds additional requirements to<br />

strengthen the annual reporting on military and security challenges from <strong>China</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!