05.08.2013 Views

Case.Study:.Sidmar.–.Arcelor

Case.Study:.Sidmar.–.Arcelor

Case.Study:.Sidmar.–.Arcelor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The IT function at <strong>Sidmar</strong> is centralised providing services to its own organisation,<br />

as well as to the group commercial department. The IT committee<br />

at corporate level and the IBO committees at business unit level play an<br />

important role in the IT governance process. An important mechanism in this<br />

context is the well defined prioritisation process scoring IT projects on the<br />

basis of their profitability, competitive advantage, operational excellence and<br />

decision support capacity. Another important mechanism is the specific role<br />

of the IT architects which primarily focuses on building a close relationship<br />

between IT and business people. Further, a start is made by development<br />

KPIs for IT.<br />

Conclusion.Pilot.Studies<br />

From these pilot case studies, different drivers for adopting IT governance<br />

were identified. An important one was certainly the need to comply with<br />

Sarbanes-Oxley requirements, which impacts heavily on the control environment<br />

in IT. Although this is in the first place a US regulation, some of the<br />

pilot companies studied, felt the need to comply because their US mother<br />

company needed to comply or because customers/suppliers were requiring<br />

it. Other important drivers for IT governance were the pressure to achieve<br />

economies of scales after mergers and acquisitions and budget pressure,<br />

resulting in a smaller IT budgets for new projects. The challenge, of course,<br />

is then to optimally assign the remaining budget to projects and activities<br />

that are delivering value to the business. Finally, some pilot case companies<br />

mentioned that the IT governance project was more an effort of formalizing<br />

and structuring existing structures and processes that were applied already.<br />

Although the aforementioned IT governance definitions stated that IT governance<br />

is a primary responsibility of the board of directors, it appeared from<br />

the pilot cases that IT governance efforts are mostly not driven by business<br />

strategic level management. The board was seldom involved in IT governance<br />

and as a result, IT governance often had a rather operational focus. In all<br />

cases, IT governance was mostly an initiative of the IT department.<br />

From these six pilot cases, it is tentatively concluded that organisations are<br />

indeed applying a mix of structures, practices, and relational mechanisms<br />

to build up an IT governance framework. The IT department of these case

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!