- Page 1 and 2: EVIDENCE OF ACCRETION-GENERATED X-R
- Page 3 and 4: 4.3.2. Spectral Modeling . . . . .
- Page 5 and 6: the first time through a telescope,
- Page 7 and 8: List of Tables Table Page 1. 2002-2
- Page 9 and 10: 19. Correlation Between Changes in
- Page 11 and 12: on Earth, nay, the entire solar sys
- Page 13 and 14: known as a molecular cloud. These s
- Page 15 and 16: internal pressure will be overcome.
- Page 17 and 18: With advancements in telescope and
- Page 19 and 20: the circumstellar disk, such as the
- Page 21: perturbations or disk instabilities
- Page 25 and 26: (1997). Once the TTS spectral class
- Page 27 and 28: Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. 1996.3
- Page 29 and 30: FUors have typical accretion rates
- Page 31 and 32: and radiative equilibrium and that
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER III X-RAY ASTRONOMY: A TOOL
- Page 35 and 36: of the X-ray luminosity (LX) totheb
- Page 37 and 38: filtered light curves (which had la
- Page 39 and 40: 3.1.4 Gleaning Other Information fr
- Page 41 and 42: Fig. 9a ~6.4 keV ~6.7 keV Figure 8:
- Page 43 and 44: 34 Figure 9: Schematic of the Chand
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 10: Schematic of the Chandra
- Page 47 and 48: Top View Rowland Circle Grating fac
- Page 49 and 50: electrons eventually exits the outp
- Page 51 and 52: one to e↵ectively determine the e
- Page 53 and 54: pixels or pixel columns. • Parame
- Page 55 and 56: deal of built-in flexibility in how
- Page 57 and 58: accrete most of their mass (Hartman
- Page 59 and 60: 4.2 Observations & Data Reduction O
- Page 61 and 62: were grouped into energy bins with
- Page 63 and 64: Since V1647 Ori was imaged with bot
- Page 65 and 66: 4.3 Results 4.3.1 Short-Term and Lo
- Page 67 and 68: overall X-ray light curve, the soft
- Page 69 and 70: Count Rate (cts/s) Count Rate (cts/
- Page 71 and 72: Count Rate (cts/s) Count Rate (cts/
- Page 73 and 74:
Count Rate (cts/s) Count Rate (cts/
- Page 75 and 76:
The highest measured X-ray mean cou
- Page 77 and 78:
during short-term variability, howe
- Page 79 and 80:
Change in Mean Hardness Ratio 1 0.5
- Page 81 and 82:
These results suggest that we can i
- Page 83 and 84:
Table 3. Model Fits for 2008-2009 C
- Page 85 and 86:
For the CXO observations of V1647 O
- Page 87 and 88:
normalized counts s −1 keV −1
- Page 89 and 90:
Determining a robust model for the
- Page 91 and 92:
April 4 XMM observation (109 eV) an
- Page 93 and 94:
s −1 ) Log Observed Flux (ergs cm
- Page 95 and 96:
tures of a few million Kelvin (kTX
- Page 97 and 98:
2004 March, especially if the large
- Page 99 and 100:
and AK =0.5on2004Feburary18,allofwh
- Page 101 and 102:
In order to test whether CXO would
- Page 103 and 104:
• and X-ray luminosities that are
- Page 105 and 106:
With V1647 Ori being observed inten
- Page 107 and 108:
level approximately one year after
- Page 109 and 110:
of an object in which this process
- Page 111 and 112:
eduction. In §3, we discuss the re
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 5. Chandra ACIS Observations
- Page 115 and 116:
5.3 Results from X-ray Observations
- Page 117 and 118:
y an intervening column of hydrogen
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 6. Best-Fit Models for EX Lup
- Page 121 and 122:
component plasma, subject to a sing
- Page 123 and 124:
does require a third, heavily-absor
- Page 125 and 126:
5.3.3 The Temporal Evolution of the
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 29 shows the three CXO spect
- Page 129 and 130:
From 2008 June to August, the plasm
- Page 131 and 132:
June, however, the X-ray flux from
- Page 133 and 134:
to test this light curve for possib
- Page 135 and 136:
We note that in the above analysis,
- Page 137 and 138:
5.5 Discussion & Conclusions The op
- Page 139 and 140:
CHAPTER VI DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIO
- Page 141 and 142:
sensitive line diagnostics that wou
- Page 143 and 144:
Bell, K. R., Lin, D. N. C., & Ruden
- Page 145 and 146:
Hartmann, L. & Kenyon, S. J. 1996,
- Page 147 and 148:
Orlando, S., Peres, G., & Reale, F.
- Page 149:
Venkat, V. & Anandarao, B. G. 2011,