EVIDENCE OF ACCRETION-GENERATED X-RAYS IN THE YOUNG ...
EVIDENCE OF ACCRETION-GENERATED X-RAYS IN THE YOUNG ...
EVIDENCE OF ACCRETION-GENERATED X-RAYS IN THE YOUNG ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.1.3 X-ray Production & Accretion<br />
One of the possible X-ray generation mechanisms is accretion of material from a<br />
circumstellar disk. Calvet & Gullbring (1998) determined that material near free-fall<br />
velocity can be shock-heated due to the large velocity gradient. They find that the<br />
plasma temperature, according to strong-shock theory, is given by<br />
TS ⇡ 3.5 M<br />
M<br />
✓ R<br />
R<br />
◆ 1<br />
[MK]. (3.1)<br />
Substituting values for the radius and mass of typical TTSs (M = 0.1–1 M and R<br />
=0.5–2R ) into Equation 3.1, the expected shock temperature is TS ⇡ 0.4–4 MK,<br />
which corresponds to an X-ray temperature of kTX ⇡ 0.035–0.35 keV.<br />
Stassun et al. (2006) searched for a possible link between X-ray production and<br />
accretion using COUP data and time-correlated BVRI photometry of young stars<br />
in the ONC. With accretion known to produce increases in optical flux, variability<br />
in optical flux (due to accretion) that is correlated with variability in X-ray flux<br />
would suggest that both flux variations are the result of accretion. Stassun et al.<br />
(2006) found that only 5% of their sample showed any correlation/anti-correlation<br />
between X-ray and optical variations, suggesting that accretion hotspots in the stellar<br />
photosphere are not dominant sites of X-ray production. However, it is still unclear<br />
as to why there is sometimes a correlation between optical and X-ray flux in some<br />
objects and not others when there are no observable characteristics that distinguish<br />
the stars in the 95% group from those in the 5% group.<br />
29