05.08.2013 Views

Madness in English-Canadian Fiction - ub-dok - Universität Trier

Madness in English-Canadian Fiction - ub-dok - Universität Trier

Madness in English-Canadian Fiction - ub-dok - Universität Trier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Extend<strong>in</strong>g Freud's theories now by <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g his former mentioned <strong>in</strong>sight on the<br />

signifier, Lacan suggests some rather provocative ratios <strong>in</strong> which "the unconscious is<br />

the whole structure of language"89 and its "dream-work follows the laws of the<br />

signifier"90. So where Freud sees the general dynamic of psychic "distortion", Lacan<br />

sights the float<strong>in</strong>g signifier. Examples for Freud of such distortions formed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

unconscious <strong>in</strong>clude dream s<strong>ub</strong>stitutions, reversals, <strong>in</strong>versions, associations, and<br />

identifications.91 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Freud, these distortions ultimately disguise the<br />

signified beyond recognition. In other words, the formative processes of the<br />

dreamwork <strong>in</strong> the unconscious distort and thereby create float<strong>in</strong>g signifiers. Just here<br />

Lacan revises Freud, observ<strong>in</strong>g that all signifiers float s<strong>in</strong>ce they are always already<br />

productions of the human psyche. To the extent that signifiers have psychological<br />

values and associations, they have undergone some degree of distortion. All signifiers<br />

are distorted from the start. While Freud implies an orig<strong>in</strong>ally undistorted signifier<br />

that unfortunately undergoes later distortion, Lacan posits distortion at the source, so<br />

that no uncontam<strong>in</strong>ated signifier exists to start with.<br />

One of Lacan's major aims <strong>in</strong> his analysis throughout has been to persuade us to<br />

abandon whatever belief we cl<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong> the autonomy of the ego, not as an agent <strong>in</strong><br />

society, but as an agent controll<strong>in</strong>g our own words and actions. Lacan, after Freud,<br />

dwells on the function of the Id, those disruptive impulses of the s<strong>ub</strong>conscious which<br />

refuse all authority and stability to the Ego. The Ego, <strong>in</strong> Lacan's scheme is a false<br />

construct which we are <strong>in</strong>duced to make after our earliest experiences as an <strong>in</strong>fant on<br />

see<strong>in</strong>g ourselves <strong>in</strong> the mirror and so assum<strong>in</strong>g that we possess a permanent and<br />

unchang<strong>in</strong>g identity. This fictional Ego soon engages the Other, society and language,<br />

whereupon the pure s<strong>ub</strong>ject encounters the whole human world of knowledge and<br />

experience: the world of signifiers quickly comes <strong>in</strong>to play. It is here that Lacan's<br />

favourite objections to psychoanalysis as traditionally practised is located, for even<br />

though this imag<strong>in</strong>ary "I" created <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fancy rema<strong>in</strong>s important life-long psychic<br />

material for psychoanalysis, it is still no more than an imag<strong>in</strong>ary precipate and it thus<br />

seems rather absurd for proponents of "ego psychology" to appo<strong>in</strong>t themselves to the<br />

task of stabiliz<strong>in</strong>g that ghostly entity.<br />

It is largely due to Lacan's <strong>in</strong>fluence that the traditional sense of s<strong>ub</strong>ject as an<br />

abbreviation of the conscious or th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>ub</strong>ject, mean<strong>in</strong>g the self or ego, or<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual cogito, has become a target of attack for the belief that the <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

89 Ibid., p. 147<br />

90 Ibid., p. 161<br />

91 cf Freud, Sigmund: The Interpretations of Dreams.- In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud:<br />

Vol. IV / ed. by James Strachey.- London: Hogarth Press, 1966-74.- Chapter 4 and 6<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!