09.08.2013 Views

here - CD8 T cells - The Body

here - CD8 T cells - The Body

here - CD8 T cells - The Body

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PHOTO: CHERyl MAnn<br />

WhOLISTIC PICTuRE<br />

SUE SaLTmaRSH<br />

Battle of the sexes?<br />

with all the evideNce that t<strong>here</strong> is iNdeed<br />

a “war on women” being waged by “conservatives,”<br />

it’s hard not to feel a “feministic” response. I am not a<br />

feminist. But I am also not in favor of any woman being<br />

forced to have a child she cannot support financially,<br />

emotionally, physically, or spiritually, just as no man<br />

should be forced into fatherhood that he doesn’t want<br />

and can’t do well.<br />

But I digress. Some feminists have been heard to<br />

say that no man would be <strong>here</strong> without his mother’s<br />

body having created him. I have to wonder how they<br />

could have missed the fact that a man (the sperm had<br />

to come from one of them, after all) was also involved<br />

in that creation. But then, I thought, couldn’t such<br />

biological criteria be used to argue the case for the<br />

opposite side of every agenda? Women have testosterone<br />

too and yet the number of female-only causes<br />

far outweighs male-only ones. At this stage of human<br />

history, I doubt that t<strong>here</strong> is any black or white person<br />

who doesn’t carry a gene inherited from an ancestor of<br />

the other color and yet we have racism from both sides.<br />

And, as I’ve said before, aren’t people who develop<br />

cancer after years of chain smoking just as deserving of<br />

the medical care and treatment they need to survive as<br />

people who acquire HIV after years of unprotected sex<br />

with multiple partners?<br />

When feminists angrily accuse me of misogyny, I<br />

stand by my belief that BOTH sexes are as valuable and<br />

as worthy of living as the other. And yet, if a man published<br />

a calendar called “How is a jar of Vaseline better<br />

than a woman?” I’ve no doubt he would be verbally castrated<br />

by the very women who publish “How is a cucumber<br />

better than a man?” And, by the way, the word for<br />

the female equivalent of misogyny, misandry, rarely sees<br />

the light of day, though both obviously exist in full force.<br />

I have frequently been amazed by the number of<br />

commercials on PBS and other progressive media<br />

sources that tout the urgent need to get more girls to<br />

become scientists, engineers, and mathematicians.<br />

What about the boys who are truly, innately passionate<br />

about math and science? And w<strong>here</strong> are the commercials<br />

urging more boys to become nurses, teachers, and<br />

dancers? Fact is that each sex has natural tendencies<br />

and the problem is not in getting<br />

people to go against those natural<br />

leanings, but in the rest of us<br />

accepting whatever choices they<br />

make. As a former girl, I can tell you<br />

that t<strong>here</strong> is nothing on Earth that<br />

could’ve induced me to become a<br />

scientist, engineer, or mathematician.<br />

Why should I have been forced<br />

into a field I had no interest in? Why<br />

should any boy be forced to take<br />

Home Ec over Shop, to play the flute instead of football,<br />

or vice versa against his own interest?<br />

Throughout history, t<strong>here</strong> have been courageous<br />

activists of both sexes fighting for things that were<br />

good for everybody. Without Elizabeth Cady Stanton<br />

and Susan B. Anthony, the issue of women voting might<br />

never have come to the forefront, but it took 56 men in<br />

Congress to pass the amendment that gave women the<br />

right to vote. Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King were<br />

both crucial to the civil rights movement, but it was<br />

Lyndon Johnson, a white guy from Texas, who made it<br />

the law of the land.<br />

We need to stop putting each other in neat little<br />

boxes. People—every sex, every race, every religion,<br />

every size, every age, with every illness—have to decide<br />

for themselves what’s worth fighting for in this lifetime.<br />

Since 2009, we’ve had a lot of people, many who call<br />

themselves Christians and/or Republicans, deciding<br />

that the only thing worth fighting for is whatever goes<br />

against everyone who doesn’t look, believe, or act<br />

like them. But now we also have more, including some<br />

Christians/Republicans, waking up, shaking off complacency,<br />

and standing together in all their glorious varieties<br />

to fight for justice, equality, and the things that are<br />

best for the Whole.<br />

“Men should be advocates for all and not just their<br />

own gender!” feminists stridently shout. Shouldn’t<br />

women? Shouldn’t we all? Regardless of the composition<br />

of our chromosomes, we are all human. None of us<br />

would be <strong>here</strong> without the contributions of both male<br />

and female. So I propose we stop being “feminists” or<br />

“masculinists” (See? not even a word for it!) and do our<br />

best to become humanists.<br />

Breathe deep. Live Long.<br />

we need to<br />

stop putting<br />

each<br />

other in neat<br />

little boxes.<br />

regardless<br />

of the composition<br />

of<br />

our chromosomes,<br />

we are all<br />

human.<br />

POSiTivElyAwARE.COM SEPTEMBER+OCTOBER 2012 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!