10.08.2013 Views

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

answers. Any method <strong>of</strong> construction suggested, to date, for this pyramid does not satisfy the<br />

accepted standards <strong>of</strong> technology.‖<br />

The Great Pyramid‘s northern face is aligned almost perfectly to true north; its southern face almost<br />

perfectly aligned to true south; the same with its eastern and western faces. Astonishing also is that the<br />

Great Pyramid possesses almost perfect 90⁰ right angles. Very few modern buildings possess corners with<br />

perfect 90⁰ right angles. Because it makes no difference structurally and most observers are oblivious, the<br />

norm is for corners to be out <strong>of</strong> true by a whole degree or more. However, in the Great Pyramid the<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> error is almost nill: SE corner 89⁰ 56‘ 27‖, NE corner 90⁰ 3‘ 2‖, SW corner 90⁰ 0‘ 33‖, NW<br />

corner 89⁰ 59‘ 58‖. But showing an even more astounding level <strong>of</strong> advanced mathematics is the hard-todeny<br />

suggestion that the Great Pyramid is actually a model and map-projection <strong>of</strong> the northern<br />

hemisphere <strong>of</strong> the earth on a scale <strong>of</strong> 1:43, 200. The mathematics supporting this suggestion is persuasive.<br />

This means that the ancient builders, probably working anywhere from 11-7, 000 years ago, had an<br />

accurate knowledge <strong>of</strong> the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the planet.<br />

The alignments to true north, south, east and west; the near-perfect 90⁰ right angles; the incredible<br />

symmetry <strong>of</strong> the four enormous sides; the engineering logistics <strong>of</strong> raising millions <strong>of</strong> huge stones hundreds<br />

<strong>of</strong> feet in the air; all <strong>of</strong> these are ‗almost impossible‘. Just how supra-modern the Ancient Egyptian culture<br />

is was aptly stated by Jean-François Champollian, founder <strong>of</strong> modern Egyptology: beside the Egyptians <strong>of</strong><br />

old, he said, ―we in Europe are but Lilliputians.‖<br />

Why did I spend this time talking about the scientific advancement <strong>of</strong> the ancient Egyptians? First,<br />

because it demonstrates clearly that Bro Mubaashir‘s Darwinian view <strong>of</strong> human intellectual history is<br />

simply out-dated and wrong. <strong>Dr</strong>. Charles Fince expresses this fact well when he remarks:<br />

―as history dawns in the Nile Valley at the end <strong>of</strong> the 5 th millennium B.C., medicine is already at<br />

a very advanced state and…in fact, it underwent a decline in later ages which was not reversed<br />

until the scientific breakthroughs <strong>of</strong> the 18 th and 19 th centuries. It is the conceit <strong>of</strong> modern<br />

historiography that human culture has evolved in linear fashion from the simple to the complex,<br />

from the primitive to the advanced, from the lower to the higher, reaching its pinnacle in the<br />

post-Renaissance civilization <strong>of</strong> Western Europe. A more clear-sighted perception <strong>of</strong> history<br />

would show us that this flies in the face <strong>of</strong> the true facts; the progression <strong>of</strong> human civilization<br />

might be more accurately described as a sinusoidal wave, in which the ebb and flow <strong>of</strong> civilized<br />

progress is represented by peaks and valleys. From every pinnacle there is a regression and every<br />

succeeding civilization is faced with having to re-discover old truths. The Greek ‗miracle‘ is but<br />

the detritus <strong>of</strong> ancient Egyptian thought and many <strong>of</strong> the ‗marvels‘ <strong>of</strong> the modern age are the<br />

fruit <strong>of</strong> recovering older ideas (―Science and Symbol in Egyptian Medicine: Commentaries on<br />

the Edwin Smith Papyrus,‖ 349).‖<br />

Secondly, this evidence demonstrates the error <strong>of</strong> Bro Mubaashir‘s claim that belief in an<br />

anthropomorphic God belongs to the ‗pre-scientific‘ stage <strong>of</strong> human evolution. The scientifically and<br />

mathematically advanced culture responsible for this scientific and mathematical Wonder <strong>of</strong> the Ancient<br />

World, the Great Pyramid, was also a culture committed to the true, anthropomorphic Black God! The<br />

theological wisdom that complemented the scientific and mathematical knowledge was: ―men are mortal<br />

gods, and God is an immortal man.‖ Egyptian Sacred Science (not paganism or superstition!) was rooted<br />

in the acknowledgment <strong>of</strong> the same Self-Created Black God that the Most Honorable Elijah <strong>Muhammad</strong><br />

taught us about here in America. Here me well: that scientific wonder standing in the sands <strong>of</strong> Egypt was<br />

raised by a culture that affirmed and was committed to the self-created Black God! With the knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

that same God, the Honorable Elijah <strong>Muhammad</strong> raised in the ‗sands‘ <strong>of</strong> America a mighty Black Nation,<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!