Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad
Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad
Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
answers. Any method <strong>of</strong> construction suggested, to date, for this pyramid does not satisfy the<br />
accepted standards <strong>of</strong> technology.‖<br />
The Great Pyramid‘s northern face is aligned almost perfectly to true north; its southern face almost<br />
perfectly aligned to true south; the same with its eastern and western faces. Astonishing also is that the<br />
Great Pyramid possesses almost perfect 90⁰ right angles. Very few modern buildings possess corners with<br />
perfect 90⁰ right angles. Because it makes no difference structurally and most observers are oblivious, the<br />
norm is for corners to be out <strong>of</strong> true by a whole degree or more. However, in the Great Pyramid the<br />
margin <strong>of</strong> error is almost nill: SE corner 89⁰ 56‘ 27‖, NE corner 90⁰ 3‘ 2‖, SW corner 90⁰ 0‘ 33‖, NW<br />
corner 89⁰ 59‘ 58‖. But showing an even more astounding level <strong>of</strong> advanced mathematics is the hard-todeny<br />
suggestion that the Great Pyramid is actually a model and map-projection <strong>of</strong> the northern<br />
hemisphere <strong>of</strong> the earth on a scale <strong>of</strong> 1:43, 200. The mathematics supporting this suggestion is persuasive.<br />
This means that the ancient builders, probably working anywhere from 11-7, 000 years ago, had an<br />
accurate knowledge <strong>of</strong> the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the planet.<br />
The alignments to true north, south, east and west; the near-perfect 90⁰ right angles; the incredible<br />
symmetry <strong>of</strong> the four enormous sides; the engineering logistics <strong>of</strong> raising millions <strong>of</strong> huge stones hundreds<br />
<strong>of</strong> feet in the air; all <strong>of</strong> these are ‗almost impossible‘. Just how supra-modern the Ancient Egyptian culture<br />
is was aptly stated by Jean-François Champollian, founder <strong>of</strong> modern Egyptology: beside the Egyptians <strong>of</strong><br />
old, he said, ―we in Europe are but Lilliputians.‖<br />
Why did I spend this time talking about the scientific advancement <strong>of</strong> the ancient Egyptians? First,<br />
because it demonstrates clearly that Bro Mubaashir‘s Darwinian view <strong>of</strong> human intellectual history is<br />
simply out-dated and wrong. <strong>Dr</strong>. Charles Fince expresses this fact well when he remarks:<br />
―as history dawns in the Nile Valley at the end <strong>of</strong> the 5 th millennium B.C., medicine is already at<br />
a very advanced state and…in fact, it underwent a decline in later ages which was not reversed<br />
until the scientific breakthroughs <strong>of</strong> the 18 th and 19 th centuries. It is the conceit <strong>of</strong> modern<br />
historiography that human culture has evolved in linear fashion from the simple to the complex,<br />
from the primitive to the advanced, from the lower to the higher, reaching its pinnacle in the<br />
post-Renaissance civilization <strong>of</strong> Western Europe. A more clear-sighted perception <strong>of</strong> history<br />
would show us that this flies in the face <strong>of</strong> the true facts; the progression <strong>of</strong> human civilization<br />
might be more accurately described as a sinusoidal wave, in which the ebb and flow <strong>of</strong> civilized<br />
progress is represented by peaks and valleys. From every pinnacle there is a regression and every<br />
succeeding civilization is faced with having to re-discover old truths. The Greek ‗miracle‘ is but<br />
the detritus <strong>of</strong> ancient Egyptian thought and many <strong>of</strong> the ‗marvels‘ <strong>of</strong> the modern age are the<br />
fruit <strong>of</strong> recovering older ideas (―Science and Symbol in Egyptian Medicine: Commentaries on<br />
the Edwin Smith Papyrus,‖ 349).‖<br />
Secondly, this evidence demonstrates the error <strong>of</strong> Bro Mubaashir‘s claim that belief in an<br />
anthropomorphic God belongs to the ‗pre-scientific‘ stage <strong>of</strong> human evolution. The scientifically and<br />
mathematically advanced culture responsible for this scientific and mathematical Wonder <strong>of</strong> the Ancient<br />
World, the Great Pyramid, was also a culture committed to the true, anthropomorphic Black God! The<br />
theological wisdom that complemented the scientific and mathematical knowledge was: ―men are mortal<br />
gods, and God is an immortal man.‖ Egyptian Sacred Science (not paganism or superstition!) was rooted<br />
in the acknowledgment <strong>of</strong> the same Self-Created Black God that the Most Honorable Elijah <strong>Muhammad</strong><br />
taught us about here in America. Here me well: that scientific wonder standing in the sands <strong>of</strong> Egypt was<br />
raised by a culture that affirmed and was committed to the self-created Black God! With the knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
that same God, the Honorable Elijah <strong>Muhammad</strong> raised in the ‗sands‘ <strong>of</strong> America a mighty Black Nation,<br />
68