The Flynn effect in South Africa - CORA - University College Cork
The Flynn effect in South Africa - CORA - University College Cork
The Flynn effect in South Africa - CORA - University College Cork
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
them to test the <strong>Flynn</strong> <strong>effect</strong>, these data can be used to estimate the size of the <strong>Flynn</strong> <strong>effect</strong> for the<br />
Afrikaans-speak<strong>in</strong>g group. We use a three-step procedure: first, from people born <strong>in</strong> 1890 to people<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g born <strong>in</strong> 1985 the English-speak<strong>in</strong>g means are compared with the Afrikaans-speak<strong>in</strong>g means;<br />
second, us<strong>in</strong>g the results from the two estimation methods described above gives a clear estimate of<br />
the score ga<strong>in</strong>s for the English-speakers; third, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the ga<strong>in</strong>s from the first step and the<br />
second step results <strong>in</strong> an estimate of the score ga<strong>in</strong>s for the Afrikaans-speak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
So, <strong>in</strong> a sense the scores of the English-speak<strong>in</strong>g are used as a yardstick, albeit that the<br />
yardstick is not disconnected from the <strong>Flynn</strong> <strong>effect</strong>. Another way to look at it, is to th<strong>in</strong>k of how the<br />
Afrikaans-speak<strong>in</strong>g catch up, by compar<strong>in</strong>g their scores with the English-speak<strong>in</strong>g from people<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g born <strong>in</strong> 1890 to people be<strong>in</strong>g born <strong>in</strong> 1985.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Table 5 shows the studies where two different but comparable groups took the same test, with<br />
several years <strong>in</strong> between, us<strong>in</strong>g representative or comparable samples. <strong>The</strong> ga<strong>in</strong> per decade for<br />
Whites is on average 1.64 IQ po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
INSERT TABLE 5 HERE<br />
Table 6 lists the studies where the same group took two different test batteries at a specific<br />
time. <strong>The</strong> ga<strong>in</strong> per decade for Whites is on average 3.51 IQ po<strong>in</strong>ts. <strong>The</strong> ga<strong>in</strong> per decade for Indians<br />
is on average 1.57 IQ po<strong>in</strong>ts. <strong>The</strong>re is a difference <strong>in</strong> the ga<strong>in</strong>s between the two methods (Tables 5<br />
and 6). However, it does not seem to be a function of the method but rather of the tests compared<br />
(for example, the very large ga<strong>in</strong>s when the JSAIS is used). As can be seen from Table 6, a wider<br />
range of tests was used to calculate the ga<strong>in</strong> score and <strong>in</strong> comparison to Table 5, the time span is<br />
longer, and also more studies are used which should lead to more reliable results. High ga<strong>in</strong> scores<br />
are evidenced for the NB, JSAIS, SSAIS, and GSAT batteries. <strong>The</strong> time span covered by these<br />
batteries is however shorter than the correspond<strong>in</strong>g lower ga<strong>in</strong> scores evidenced for batteries<br />
cover<strong>in</strong>g a longer time span. When look<strong>in</strong>g at these results it should be borne <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that the<br />
methodology used, the test battery used, the number of studies and the time span covered all play a<br />
role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>al ga<strong>in</strong> score and hence putt<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to context. So, although we see<br />
relatively large ga<strong>in</strong> scores for some of the batteries, there is also a loss of score for a small numer<br />
10