13.08.2013 Views

The history of Waterbury, Connecticut - citizen hylbom blog

The history of Waterbury, Connecticut - citizen hylbom blog

The history of Waterbury, Connecticut - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

138 HISTORY OF WATERBURY.<br />

ton," who collected the rate for "j^Fort at Seahrook," in<br />

1652. May 10th, 1670, " Cherry and will the indian with<br />

three <strong>of</strong> the milford Indians were adjudged to pay to him for<br />

sider they stole from him twenty shillings." His name is on<br />

the list <strong>of</strong> freemen <strong>of</strong> Farmington in 1G69. He died JSTov. 28,<br />

1680.—Estate £312. His children were :—<br />

1. Jacob ; b. Jan. 1641, m. Mary ; left posterity, and d.<br />

170S. He lived in Farmington, in the society <strong>of</strong> Kensington.<br />

2. John; b. Jan. 16M. 3. Isaac; b. Nov. 1645, baptized<br />

Dec. 7, 1645, in Hartford, by Mr. Hooker. 4. Mary ; m. an<br />

Ellis or Allis. 5. Abraham ; baptized Nov. 28, 1647. He<br />

signed the Mattatuck articles, but declined the responsibilities<br />

<strong>of</strong> a planter. He removed to Lyme, and m. Hannah, d. <strong>of</strong><br />

Mathew Griswold, and d. at an advanced age, (Hinman says<br />

in 1647, which is probably a mistake,) leaving descendants.<br />

6. Dorcas ; m. Stephen Hopkins <strong>of</strong> Hartford, father <strong>of</strong> John <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Waterbury</strong>, and d. May 13, 1697. 7. Sarah; m. Ebenezer<br />

Kilbourn <strong>of</strong> Wethersfield.<br />

JOHN BRONSON.<br />

He was one <strong>of</strong> the thirty original subscribers, in 1674. <strong>The</strong><br />

name is written "John Bronson, Jr." <strong>The</strong> "Jr." on the<br />

Farmington records was usually applied to the son <strong>of</strong> Eich-<br />

ard; which fact has led to the conclusion that the settler in<br />

Mattatuck was the son <strong>of</strong> Kichard, and not <strong>of</strong> John. I believe,'<br />

however, but am not entirely confident, that John <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waterbury</strong><br />

was the son <strong>of</strong> John <strong>of</strong> Farmington. I find this language<br />

used on the Farmington records, under date <strong>of</strong> March 28,<br />

1695— " Land in Farmington belonging to John Browuson<br />

son <strong>of</strong> John Brownson, at Watterbury." John, the son <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Waterbury</strong> John, lived in Farmington. But John, the son<br />

<strong>of</strong> Richard, appears also have had a son John.<br />

John Bronson was an early settler <strong>of</strong> Mattatuck. He is not,<br />

however, named in the second division <strong>of</strong> fence, whicli fact in-<br />

dicates that he vacillated for a time. He lived on the north<br />

side <strong>of</strong> West Main street, where William R. Hitchcock now<br />

resides, having a lot <strong>of</strong> two acres; bounded north and south on<br />

highway, east on Lieut. Judd, west on Thomas Eichason. He<br />

m. Sarah Yentris and d. 1796. His widow d. Jan. 6, 1711-<br />

:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!