15.08.2013 Views

Benevolent Institutions - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

Benevolent Institutions - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

Benevolent Institutions - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16. Accordingly the 1871 Act provided that the Home should not form a hospital<br />

within the meaning <strong>of</strong> the Act <strong>of</strong> 1845 and so should not require registration as such.<br />

Rather it should be treated as being part <strong>of</strong> the Hospital. Patients whilst at the Home<br />

should continue to be subject to all enactments and regulations relating to patients at<br />

the Hospital. 47 The <strong>Commission</strong>ers <strong>of</strong> Lunacy were given the same powers <strong>of</strong> visiting<br />

and superintending the Home as if it had been a hospital registered under the Act <strong>of</strong><br />

1845. 48 The remaining provisions <strong>of</strong> the 1871 Act related to the Hospital Governor’s<br />

powers to maintain and alter the Home at Witley and to hold other land in the same<br />

parish 49 , the approval <strong>of</strong> the Charity <strong>Commission</strong>ers in relation to those powers 50 , the<br />

making and exhibition <strong>of</strong> regulations concerning the Home 51 , and ancillary<br />

provisions. 52<br />

The move to Beckenham<br />

17. All three Acts became unnecessary in 1930 when the Hospital moved from<br />

Southwark to its present site in Beckenham. 53 The buildings at the old site had<br />

become antiquated and not best suited for the needs <strong>of</strong> the Hospital. The Hospital<br />

Governors and the City <strong>of</strong> London disposed <strong>of</strong> their respective leasehold and<br />

freehold interests in the Southwark site. Because the new site at Beckenham already<br />

had convalescence facilities, the Hospital Governors also disposed <strong>of</strong> the Home.<br />

The Southwark site became vested in the London County Council as an open space<br />

under the Open Spaces Act 1906. Part <strong>of</strong> the site is today occupied by the Imperial<br />

War Museum. 54<br />

18. The Hospital’s move from Southwark in 1930 and the sale <strong>of</strong> the Home that<br />

year means that the 1810, 1839 and 1871 Acts are now unnecessary. Their repeal is<br />

proposed on that basis.<br />

47 The 1871 Act, s 7.<br />

48 The 1871 Act, s 8.<br />

49 The 1871 Act, ss 3, 4, 9.<br />

50 The 1871 Act, s 10.<br />

51 The 1871 Act, ss 5, 6.<br />

52 The 1871 Act, s 1 (short title), s 2 (interpretation), s 11 (expenses <strong>of</strong> Act).<br />

53 The Beckenham site was known as the Monks Orchard Estate. The Bethlem Hospital Act 1928 (18 &<br />

19 Geo.5 c.xli) empowered the Hospital Governors to sell or let part <strong>of</strong> the Estate not required for the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> the Hospital.<br />

54 Arrangements for the use <strong>of</strong> the Southwark site as an open space and for accommodating the<br />

Imperial War Museum were provided for by the Bethlem Hospital Act 1926 (16 & 17 Geo.5 c.xlviii) as<br />

amended by the Bethlem Hospital Act 1931 (21 & 22 Geo.5 c.lxiii).<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!