Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and ... - Law Commission
Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and ... - Law Commission
Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and ... - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PART 3<br />
REFORM OF THE LAW OF EASEMENTS AND<br />
PROFITS<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
3.1 In this Part we are concerned with reform to, <strong>and</strong> refinement of, the current law<br />
relating to easements <strong>and</strong> profits. Of the three interests with which our project is<br />
concerned, these are the ones that can at present exist as legal interests in l<strong>and</strong>,<br />
title to which can be registered. They are of great antiquity, <strong>and</strong> for the most part<br />
our recommendations would simplify law which has become too complex over<br />
decades <strong>and</strong> even centuries.<br />
3.2 This Part addresses the following topics:<br />
(1) the creation of profits;<br />
(2) the implication of easements;<br />
(3) section 62 of the <strong>Law</strong> of Property Act 1925;<br />
(4) the acquisition of easements by prescription;<br />
(5) easements that confer the right to extensive use (in particular, parking);<br />
(6) the extinguishment of easements <strong>and</strong> profits by ab<strong>and</strong>onment; <strong>and</strong><br />
(7) the termination of the estate to which an interest is appurtenant.<br />
(1) THE CREATION OF PROFITS<br />
3.3 As we noted in Part 2, ideally (for the sake of clarity) interests in l<strong>and</strong> are created<br />
expressly. Express words are the most reliable indicator of precisely what the<br />
parties were creating. However, both easements <strong>and</strong> profits can also be created<br />
by implication <strong>and</strong> prescription.<br />
3.4 An easement or profit may be implied in a transaction where there is no express<br />
grant or reservation, but there is some other basis – rooted in the existing use of<br />
the l<strong>and</strong>, the parties’ intentions, or some degree of necessity – on which it can be<br />
said that in some sense there must or should have been a grant or reservation. 1<br />
3.5 Prescription is the acquisition of a right by long use. 2 A claimant who behaves,<br />
over a long period, as if he or she had an easement or profit – in circumstances<br />
where the owner of the relevant l<strong>and</strong> is aware of what is happening <strong>and</strong> does not<br />
take action – acquires an easement or profit, the scope of which is determined by<br />
the behaviour by which it was acquired. For example, if X walks across Y’s l<strong>and</strong><br />
over a long period, <strong>and</strong> Y is aware of that behaviour <strong>and</strong> does nothing, X will<br />
acquire an easement giving him the legal right to walk across Y’s l<strong>and</strong> but nothing<br />
1 See Gale on <strong>Easements</strong>, para 3-17 <strong>and</strong> following.<br />
2 See Gale on <strong>Easements</strong>, ch 4.<br />
27