(Redacted) - Responses 105 to 130 - Law Commission

Consultation response 106 of 130
10.46 We provisionally propose that there should be no distinction in the basis of consideration
when apparatus is sited across a linear obstacle.
Do consultees agree?
No observations
Consultation Paper, Part 6, paragraph 6.78.
10.47 We provisionally propose that, where an order is made requiring alteration of a Code
Operator’s apparatus, the appropriate body should be entitled to consider whether any
portion of the payment originally made to the person seeking the alteration in relation to
the original installation of that apparatus should be repaid.
Yes.
Do consultees agree?
Consultation Paper, Part 6, paragraph 6.83.
Page 1374 of 1868