15.08.2013 Views

(Redacted) - Responses 105 to 130 - Law Commission

(Redacted) - Responses 105 to 130 - Law Commission

(Redacted) - Responses 105 to 130 - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Consultation response 116 of <strong>130</strong><br />

10.54 We provisionally propose that a revised code should prescribe consistent notice<br />

procedures – with and without counter-notices where appropriate – and should set out<br />

rules for service.<br />

Yes<br />

Do consultees agree?<br />

Consultation Paper, Part 7, paragraph 7.52.<br />

10.55 Do consultees consider that the forms of notices available <strong>to</strong> Code Opera<strong>to</strong>rs could be<br />

improved? If so, how?<br />

Consultation Paper, Part 7, paragraph 7.53.<br />

A Counter Notice in respect of para 21 is often merely served as a delaying tactic, which should<br />

clearly not be permitted.<br />

10.56 Do consultees consider that more information is needed for landowners? If so, what is<br />

required and how should it be provided?<br />

Consultation Paper, Part 7, paragraph 7.54.<br />

Page 1691 of 1868

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!