15.08.2013 Views

(Redacted) - Responses 105 to 130 - Law Commission

(Redacted) - Responses 105 to 130 - Law Commission

(Redacted) - Responses 105 to 130 - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Consultation response 114 of <strong>130</strong><br />

10.6 Do consultees consider that code rights should generate obligations upon Code Opera<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

and, if so, what?<br />

Consultation Paper, Part 3, paragraph 3.19.<br />

Yes. In short, duties of honest disclosure and transparency. See paras 9, 10, 11.3, 11.4, 13, 14,<br />

15, 21 and 22 of the accompanying note.<br />

10.7 We ask consultees <strong>to</strong> tell us their views on the definition of electronic communications<br />

apparatus in paragraph 1(1) of the Code. Should it be amended, and if so should further<br />

equipment, or classes of equipment, be included within it?<br />

Consultation Paper, Part 3, paragraph 3.27.<br />

No observation save that agreements between landowners and opera<strong>to</strong>rs should be governed by<br />

the definition in force at the date of the agreement. See para 23 of the accompanying note.<br />

10.8 We ask consultees <strong>to</strong> tell us their views about who should be bound by code rights<br />

created by agreement, and <strong>to</strong> tell us their experience of the practical impact of the current<br />

position under the Code.<br />

Consultation Paper, Part 3, paragraph 3.40.<br />

As <strong>to</strong> who should be bound by Code rights - See para 21.2 of the accompanying note.<br />

As <strong>to</strong> experiences - See paras 13 - 15 of the accompanying note.<br />

Page 1640 of 1868

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!