21.08.2013 Views

Transverse waves on a string - People.fas.harvard.edu

Transverse waves on a string - People.fas.harvard.edu

Transverse waves on a string - People.fas.harvard.edu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3. IMPEDANCE 13<br />

In the case of uniform tensi<strong>on</strong> discussed in the previous secti<strong>on</strong>, we had T1 = T2, so this<br />

equati<strong>on</strong> r<strong>edu</strong>ced to the first equality in Eq. (24). With the tensi<strong>on</strong>s now distinct, the <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

modificati<strong>on</strong> to the sec<strong>on</strong>d equality in Eq. (24) is the extra factors of T1 and T2. So in terms<br />

of the f functi<strong>on</strong>s, Eq. (34) becomes<br />

− T1<br />

v1<br />

f ′ i (t) + T1<br />

v1<br />

f ′ r(t) = − T2<br />

f ′ t(t). (35)<br />

The other boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> (the c<strong>on</strong>tinuity of the <strong>string</strong>) is unchanged, so all of the<br />

results in the previous secti<strong>on</strong> can be carried over, with the <strong>on</strong>ly modificati<strong>on</strong> being that<br />

wherever we had a v1, we now have v1/T1. And likewise for v2. The quantity v/T can be<br />

written as<br />

where<br />

v<br />

T =<br />

T/µ<br />

T<br />

v2<br />

= 1<br />

√ ≡<br />

T µ 1<br />

, (36)<br />

Z<br />

Z ≡ T<br />

v = T µ (37)<br />

is called the impedance. We’ll discuss Z in depth below, but for now we’ll simply note that<br />

the results in the previous secti<strong>on</strong> are modified by replacing v1 with 1/ √ T1µ1 ≡ 1/Z1, and<br />

likewise for v2. The reflecti<strong>on</strong> and transmissi<strong>on</strong> coefficients in Eq. (31) therefore become<br />

R =<br />

1<br />

Z2<br />

1<br />

Z2<br />

− 1<br />

Z1<br />

+ 1<br />

Z1<br />

= Z1 − Z2<br />

Z1 + Z2<br />

Note that Z grows with both T and µ.<br />

Physical meaning of impedance<br />

and T =<br />

1<br />

Z2<br />

2<br />

Z2<br />

+ 1<br />

Z1<br />

=<br />

2Z1<br />

Z1 + Z2<br />

What is the meaning of the impedance? It makes our formulas look nice, but does it have<br />

any actual physical significance? Indeed it does. C<strong>on</strong>sider the transverse force that the ring<br />

applies to the <strong>string</strong> <strong>on</strong> its left. Since there is zero net force <strong>on</strong> the ring, this force also<br />

equals the transverse force that the right <strong>string</strong> applies to the ring, which is<br />

∂ψR(x, t)<br />

Fy = T2<br />

∂x<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

x=0<br />

∂ft(t − x/v2)<br />

= T2<br />

∂x<br />

(38)<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

, (39)<br />

x=0<br />

where we have labeled the transverse directi<strong>on</strong> as the y directi<strong>on</strong>. But the chain rule tells<br />

us that the x and t partial derivatives of ft are related by<br />

∂ft(t − x/v2)<br />

∂x<br />

= − 1<br />

v2<br />

· ∂ft(t − x/v2)<br />

∂t<br />

. (40)<br />

Substituting this into Eq. (39) and switching back to the ψR(x, t) notati<strong>on</strong> gives<br />

Fy = − T2<br />

·<br />

v2<br />

∂ψR(x,<br />

<br />

t) <br />

<br />

∂t = −<br />

x=0<br />

T2<br />

· vy ≡ −bvy, (41)<br />

v2<br />

where vy = ∂ψR(x, t)/∂t is the transverse velocity of the ring (at x = 0), and where b is<br />

defined to be T2/v2.<br />

This force Fy (which again, is the force that the ring applies to the <strong>string</strong> <strong>on</strong> its left) has<br />

the interesting property that it is proporti<strong>on</strong>al to the (negative of the) transverse velocity.<br />

It therefore acts exactly like a damping force. If we removed the right <strong>string</strong> and replaced<br />

the ring with a massless plate immersed in a fluid (in other words, a pist<strong>on</strong>), and if we

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!