24.08.2013 Views

Vermillion Notch After Millard Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip - ESPRS

Vermillion Notch After Millard Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip - ESPRS

Vermillion Notch After Millard Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip - ESPRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

280 Vol. 33, No. 2 / <strong>Vermillion</strong> <strong>Notch</strong> <strong>After</strong> <strong>Millard</strong> <strong>Repair</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Unilateral</strong> <strong>Cleft</strong> <strong>Lip</strong><br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this article is to analyze different<br />

factors responsible for vermillion notching<br />

and assess the results <strong>of</strong> labial revisions addressing<br />

these factors.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Twenty children with vermillion notching after<br />

<strong>Millard</strong> repair <strong>of</strong> unilateral cleft lip were included<br />

in this study. Age <strong>of</strong> the patients ranged from 2-<br />

12 years with a mean <strong>of</strong> 4.3 years. Six patients<br />

were males while 14 were females. They were<br />

operated upon for their secondary lip deformity<br />

by the authors at the Children’s Hospital, Cairo<br />

University (Aboul Reesh), during the period from<br />

January 2006 till December 2008.<br />

All patients had had their previous lip repair<br />

performed using the classic <strong>Millard</strong> rotationadvancement<br />

flap technique. Preoperative assessment<br />

was performed clinically together with preoperative<br />

standard photography. Assessment included<br />

lip length as compared to the non-cleft side<br />

(short/equal), integrity <strong>of</strong> Cupid’s bow (smooth/<br />

tented), vermillion fullness on either side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

notch (near normal fullness/deficient), the severity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the notch (mild/severe) and the quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

scar (masked/obvious) (Table 1).<br />

Table (1): Results <strong>of</strong> preoperative assessment.<br />

Item<br />

Short <strong>Lip</strong><br />

Tented Cupid’s Bow<br />

Deficient <strong>Vermillion</strong><br />

Severe <strong>Notch</strong>ing<br />

Obvious Scar<br />

Number<br />

Percentage<br />

All corrective procedures were performed under<br />

general anesthesia. The technique was tailored<br />

according to pre and intra-operative findings. Intraoperative<br />

assessment included the bulk <strong>of</strong> muscle<br />

fibers at the lower lip margin. Surgical techniques<br />

used included muscle re-approximation, revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> medial segment rotation and modification <strong>of</strong><br />

the paring point on the lateral lip segment. Scar<br />

revision was done in cases with obvious scars.<br />

Patients were followed-up weekly during the<br />

first month, then monthly thereafter. Postoperative<br />

assessment using both clinical and photographic<br />

documentation was performed after a minimal <strong>of</strong><br />

15<br />

15<br />

11<br />

6<br />

8<br />

75<br />

75<br />

55<br />

30<br />

40<br />

3 months <strong>of</strong> corrective surgery. Follow-up period<br />

ranged from 3 to 34 months with a median <strong>of</strong> 16<br />

months.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Preoperative assessment revealed short lip with<br />

tented Cupid’s bow in 15 cases (75%), deficient<br />

vermillion in 11 cases (55%), severe notching in<br />

6 cases (30%) and obvious scar in 8 cases (40%)<br />

(Table 1). Intra-operative assessment showed deficient<br />

muscle fibers at the lower lip border in all<br />

20 cases (100%) (Fig. 1). Patients with deficient<br />

vermillion (n=11) included two different groups,<br />

those with hypoplastic medial segments (n=2) and<br />

those with medially placed paring point on the<br />

lateral lip segment (n=9). This latter group retained<br />

cleft tissue in their previous repairs that accounted<br />

for the hypoplastic appearance <strong>of</strong> the vermillion<br />

at the site <strong>of</strong> notching.<br />

Surgical technique included dissection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

muscle bulk and re-approximation at the lower lip<br />

border in all cases. In 15 cases (75%), total revision<br />

was performed to increase the rotation <strong>of</strong> the medial<br />

lip segment. Back cuts were used in these cases to<br />

gain enough length. In 9 cases (45%), lateral displacement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the paring point was done on the<br />

lateral lip segment with excision <strong>of</strong> excess cleft<br />

tissue available at the lateral aspect <strong>of</strong> the vermillion<br />

notch (Fig. 2). Too medial placement <strong>of</strong> the paring<br />

point was the only case in 5 cases, while 4 cases<br />

had both inadequate rotation in addition to lateral<br />

paring point displacement. These 4 cases therefore<br />

needed total lip revision to improve rotation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

medial segment, in addition to lateral displacement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the paring point on the lateral segment. Although<br />

the old scar was obvious only in 8 cases, however,<br />

a total <strong>of</strong> 17 cases (85%) had their scar revised.<br />

Those included the 15 total lip revisions in addition<br />

to 2 cases with obvious scars that did not need<br />

total revision (Table 2).<br />

Table (2): Surgical techniques.<br />

Technique<br />

Re-approximation <strong>of</strong> muscle at the<br />

lower lip margin<br />

Total <strong>Lip</strong> Revision with adequate<br />

rotation <strong>of</strong> the medial segment<br />

Lateral Displacement <strong>of</strong> the paring<br />

point on the lateral segment<br />

Scar revision (including total lip<br />

revisions)<br />

Number<br />

20<br />

15<br />

9<br />

17<br />

Percentage<br />

100<br />

75<br />

45<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!