ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Town of Essex, Vermont

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES
January 3, 2013
ZONING BOARD MEMBERS: Hubert Norton, Chair, Michael Plageman, Vice-Chair;
Edith Klimoski; and Mitch Lefevre.
OTHERS PRESENT: Sharon Kelley, Zoning Administrator; Mark & Suzanne Perkell;
William & Irene Keithcart; Hollie Heil; Lyn Nash; Robert Groleau; R. (illegible); Alan
Tsefrekas; Pam Alexander; Dan Liguori; Lydia P. Wisloski; Susan & Steven Lackey;
Chris & Candice Hosmir; John Flannigan; Matt Ryan; Aubrey DePaul; Doreen Giannelli;
Robert Snapp; Cathy Hurst; Jay & Joanie Kagan; Christine & Ben Gilliam; Brian
Marcotte; Leo & Joan Sheporaitis; Holly Fenster; Henri de Marne; Bob Desrosiers; Andy
Stricker; Nancy Pratt; Victoria Brown; Marie Sadler; Mary A. Thomas; Leslie D.
Desrosiers; Randall R. Pratt; and Denis Dees, Jason Starr, Essex Reporter.
Chairman Hubert Norton called the meeting to order at 6:06 p.m. The Board heard
Agenda Item 2 first.
AGENDA ITEM 2: Alan Tsefrekas is requesting an appeal of the Zoning Administrator‟s
decision for the removal of pigs located at 8 Valleyview Drive in the Medium Density
Residential (R2) Zoning District. Tax Map 24, Parcel 23.
Hubert Norton administered the oath and opened the fact finding/public hearing portion
of the meeting.
The Zoning Administrator, Sharon Kelley, noted additional e-mails and the applicant‟s
narrative submitted on behalf of the application was distributed at the start of the
meeting. The Zoning Administrator read through comments listed in a General
Information document dated 1/3/13 and noted the following attachments or additional
information:
Under 6: Reply e-mail to the Zoning Administrator from Ms. Alayna Howard
from the Vermont Environmental Compliance & Enforcement Division and a
copy of the VT State Standards Chapter 117, T.24 section 4413. Limitations on
municipal bylaws;
Under 23: Added language that some of the pigs were currently pregnant;
Under 25: Added language to includ that at any time there was a glitch, Ms.
Susan Magidson from Pig Placement would pull her offer;
Under 26: Reference to an e-mail dated 1/3/13 to the Zoning Administrator from
Ms. Tammie Hartshorn of New Hampshire;
Attachment: Pictures taken of Mr. Tsefrekas‟ home.
Attachment: Mr. Marcotte‟s letter;
Attachment: Section 4.2 of Zoning Regulations;
Attachment: Various e-mails.
Attachment: Excerpts of police report; and

47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
Attachment: CutiePigs website information.
Florence Cheryl Gruber spoke on behalf of the application and pointed out the following:
She and Mr. Tsefrekas never intended to have this many pigs and piglets, but that
it was an emergency situation in order to save the lives of the pigs.
She was a breeder, but her website, CutiePigs.com, has not been used for months,
and it was not her intention to set up a business.
She and Mr. Tsefrekas have been constantly cleaning the house to care for the
pigs and as a result get very little sleep.
The chickens had belonged to Nancy Tsefrekas, who currently resides in
California, but they are no longer on the premises.
Pig feces doesn‟t smell half as bad as dog and cat feces and is good manure.
The pig manure on the yard was removed and they now discard the pig manure as
waste in the same manner as dog and cat feces.
She did not feel the neighborhood smell could be attributed to their pigs because
there has been a smell for a long time due to a farm nearby and the pigs are not
outside. Therefore, she stated that the pigs have not had any impact outside Mr.
Tsefrekas‟ house.
The pigs are miniature, household pigs, hypoallergenic, are the 4 th most intelligent
animal on the planet and are good companions.
The pigs are quieter, safer and have less odor than dogs and are not large farm
swines.
Pigs have only been bred over the last 30 years and many towns are bringing
ordinances up-to-speed to allow these pigs as household pets.
She and Mr. Tsefrekas were asking to be treated fairly as they would like to be
able to keep 2 or 3 pigs on their premises and because pigs were smaller, safer
and more hypoallergenic than dogs and cats.
She stated that there was a big prejudice against pigs because of misinformation
or lack of knowledge about pigs.
The visit from the Humane Society showed that their house was clean, safe and
sanitary.
Norton asked Ms. Gruber about the definition of “miniature”. Ms. Gruber explained that
her largest pig was knee high and weighed 100 pounds and was the best, calmest and
most social pig she had. Other sizes of pigs started at 14 ½ inches and at 45 pounds. In
comparison, farm pigs can get to 7 feet long and can weigh 300 to 700 pounds.
Klimoski asked if there was a written plan to get all the pigs removed by January 7, 2013.
Ms. Gruber replied that the plan was in action now with pigs being removed. Plageman
did not think the deadline was all inclusive and that there was a more adaptive schedule
for some of the pigs. He asked how many pigs would remain because they were adopted
already, and Ms. Gruber replied 6 or 7 and that it was best if they waited for Pig
Placement in Pennsylvania to get the pigs. Mr. Plageman asked why? Ms. Gruber replied
because it allowed the pigs to get into good homes through Pig Placement and would
avoid emotional damage to the pigs.
Approved 3/7/13
2

93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
Norton opened up comments from the public.
Ms. Doreen Giannelli, 18 Valleyview Drive stated that 47 animals in a home was not
acceptable nor were pets running loose in the neighborhood as she has seen happen with
these pigs. She was not confident that if the applicant was allowed to have 3 pigs that it
would remain just 3. She was also opposed to there being an RV parked in their yard.
Mr. Brian Marcotte, Pinewood Manor, Inc., 32 Hillside Circle, stated that Mr. Tsefrekas
was in direct violation of the neighborhood covenant and read paragraphs 5 and 8 from
the covenant. He stated that he spoke with Mr. Tsefrekas via the phone in the fall and was
told that there were no pigs at the residence. He was strongly opposed to having pigs in
Pinewood Manor and he felt it was a disgrace to the neighbors. He requested that there
also be some follow-up by the Town to ensure that there would be no pigs at the
residence.
Norton clarified that the ZBA had no jurisdiction with neighborhood covenants.
Ms. Holly Fenster, 36 Valleyview Drive, was in her car and saw pigs grazing. She pulled
her car over to speak with Mr. Tsefrekas and was told by him that her idling car was
scaring the pigs.
Mr. Leo Sheporaidis, 28 Skyline Drive, encouraged the applicant to buy some
agricultural land where he could keep pigs and noted that the neighbors didn‟t trust Mr.
Tsefrekas.
Ms. Lydia Wisloski, 40 Wildwood Drive, referenced the protective neighborhood
covenant that were linked to the Town of Essex Land Records. As a Real Estate Agent,
she gives directions to people looking at a house in the area so that it avoids passing by
Mr. Tsefrekas‟ property. She suspected more of a business happening at the residence.
Ms. Pam Alexander, St. Alban‟s Animal Control Officer, gave her perspective of the
situation. She stated that there were many people involved trying to address this situation,
and she recognized that there were deeper issues that added to the discomfort, particularly
for those that choose not to live with animals. However, she reassured the public that
there were many organizations involved to try to resolve this issue.
Ms. Marie Sadler, 15 Skyline Drive, felt that the applicant should give some
consideration to the people in the neighborhood. She stated that there was one mess after
the other that has been going on at the residence for 10 years and that she has tried to
respect the owners in the past.
Ms. Victoria Brown, 17 Skyline Drive, stated that she has been in Mr. Tsefrekas‟ house
and stated that it had an overpowering smell, that there were piles of stuff, pigs and
excrement everywhere and that the floors were sticky from pig urine. She stated that
there had to be an odor because she knew that Mr. Tsefrekas has been sent home from
Approved 3/7/13
3

138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
work to get cleaned up from the smell. She added that after she was at Mr. Tsefreka‟s
home, her dogs went crazy from the smell on her clothes.
Ms. Susan Lackey, 9 Ridge Road, understood both sides. However, she felt that the ZBA
needed to look at the law on the books and needed to support those laws or work towards
changing them. Either way, the law needs to be enforced.
Sharon Kelley added that there can be some agricultural livestock in an R2 District, but
that an applicant needed to go through the permitting process, which included
considering the size and/or number of animals. She encouraged the public to visit the
Town‟s website to read Section 4.2 of the Essex Zoning Regulations, which relates to this
issue.
Mr. Bob Derosier, 9 Valleyview Drive, wanted to make sure that the Town would build
in some follow up to this issue. He asked if the plan was to get rid of the animals and
whether the ZBA can rule on that issue. Norton replied yes and that there were
regulations for Mr. Tsefrekas and Ms. Gruber to follow. Changes to the regulations need
to be requested through the Planning Commission as the ZBA was a quasi-judicial board
and did not write zoning regulations.
Mr. Randy Pratt, 54 Forest Drive, asked what is going to happen with the pigs and what
is the follow up? It sounded to him that the applicant was not allowed to have pigs and
that it was a different process to get that approved.
Mr. Derosier wondered what would happen with breeding if 2 or 3 pigs were allowed.
Sharon Kelley responded that any conditional use approval would be conditioned so that
inspections occurred and that a determined number of livestock would be allowed on the
premises.
Ms. Mary Thomas, 4 Valleyview Drive, asked whether she could have a cow at her
house. Sharon Kelley reiterated that depending on the zoning district the property was in
and/or the size of the lot, a landowner could go through the conditional use review
process to request that an agricultural animal be allowed on the premises. Kelley
encouraged the public to read Section 4.2 of the Zoning Regulations that speaks to
agricultural animals.
Mr. Leo Shephoraidis, 28 Skyline Drive, felt that the history of this issue surrounding the
appearance of the property was relevant to the issue.
Ms. Aubrey DePaul, 4 Forest Road, was opposed to having pigs in the neighborhood
because she felt that pigs didn‟t belong there.
One public member was opposed to allowing pigs because once the line is crossed, it
starts to happen more and more.
Approved 3/7/13
4

183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
Ms. Irene Keithcart, 11 Creek Road, was strongly in favor of the removal of all the pigs
by Monday, January 7, 2013.
Mr. William Keithcart, 11 Creek Road, agreed with Ms. Larkey that the ZBA needs to
follow the law and agreed with Ms. Keefe that the deadline for removal of all the pigs
should be Monday, January 7, 2013. If the applicant wants pigs, then he should go
through the process of changing the ordinance.
Ms. Gruber, in response to the public comments, stated that the pigs were not in the
location before November 12, 2012 and that this issue has only been happening the last
few weeks. Gruber stated that they were getting close to the end. With regards to pigs
not belonging in the neighborhood, she argued that dogs were originally for working on
the farm and in the 1800s were brought inside as pets. Gruber emphasized that her pigs
were house pets, not livestock, as they were bred to be house pets. They were also in the
process of getting the pigs neutered and spayed. Gruber stated that the pigs are small,
calm and safe house-sized pets.
Mr. Marcotte felt that this issue was common sense. He has never seen a problem to this
extent in this neighborhood and stated that it was not called for. He added that the RV
was not a pretty sight.
Norton commented that some of the discussion was off point and the issue before them
was to determine if the ZBA should uphold the Zoning Administrator‟s decision which
requires the removal of pigs from the premises.
Ms. Brown added that when she was in Mr. Tsfrekas‟ house, some of the pigs didn‟t get
along with others, and she noticed the damage to the house the pigs had caused. She
disagreed that pigs were gentle and resented the comparison to dogs. She gave an
example of a pig trying to eat her pants when she was in the house.
Mr. Mark Perkell, 45 Windridge Road, has never been more embarrassed and felt this
issue was sad. He agreed with Ms. Lackey and asked the ZBA to look at the law and
interpret it in a way that is just.
Mr. Denis Dees, 20 Valleyview Drive, was in favor of allowing one week for the
applicants to address this issue and for the ZBA to set a firm deadline.
Ms. Gruber stated that the main complaint was related to impacts, and she did not hear
any comments on impacts to the neighbors. Gruber stated that the appeal was to give
them the needed time to get all the pigs re-homed in the most humane manner.
Sharon Kelley expressed that Ms. Gruber and Mr. Tsefrekas have worked with her
cooperatively on this issue and were welcoming the help from various organizations.
Ms. Christine Gilliam, 29 Wildwood Drive, wanted to know if there was a plan in place
for the removal of all of the pigs and was concerned about the fact that there was a
Approved 3/7/13
5

229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
pregnant pig. She asked if there were adoption papers for the ones to be adopted.
Additionally, with regards to the applicant‟s request to keep 3 pigs, she was concerned
that there were so many unknowns. Sharon Kelley noted that Ms. Gruber is actively
working with a number of people, some of which were rescues.
Ms. Gruber added that there needed to be careful, heated transportation for the safety and
health of the pigs and piglets.
Ms. Leslie Derosier, 9 Valleyview Drive, was in favor of the removal of all of the pigs
and to let the applicant go before the Planning Commission for a zoning request change
to allow for 2 or 3 pigs.
Norton stated that the Zoning Administration‟s citation was for the removal of all the
pigs.
Mr. Keithcart asked about a follow-up inspection.
Ms. Thomas wanted to know why Mr. Tsefrekas had pigs if he knew the rules.
Klimoski asked the Zoning Administrator about the notification process. Sharon Kelley
explained that a Notice of Violation was sent to the applicants on November 20, 2012
informing them that they were in violation of State Statute by having pigs on the
premises without town approval and that the applicants had 7 days to cure the violation.
If they failed to do so, the Zoning Administrator would file a complaint in the Vermont
Environmental Court seeking enforcement of the notice of violation and the applicant
could be charged penalty fees. Currently, nothing has been filed with the Environmental
Court. The applicants were also told in the final notice that they had the right to appeal
this action by filing an appeal for a hearing before the Zoning Board of Adjustment
within 15 days of the notice, which is the action that was taken by Mr. Tsefrekas.
Hubert Norton MOVED and Edith Klimoski SECONDED a MOTION to close the
fact finding/public hearing portion of the meeting. The MOTION passed 4-0-0.
During its deliberations, the Board discussed the findings, any additional findings and the
conditions. The Board made the following motion:
Michael Plageman MOVED and Edith Klimoski SECONDED a MOTION to uphold the
Zoning Administrator’s Notice of Violation dated 11/20/12, relative to the Tsefrekas
residence on 8 Valleyview Drive, Essex Jct., Vt., requiring that all pigs and piglets be
removed from the premises, according to the following Findings and Conditions:
FINDINGS:
1. The Town of Essex records list the landowners of 8 Valleyview Drive, Essex
Junction, Vermont as:
Approved 3/7/13
6

275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
Alan M. Tsefrekas
Nancy S. Droze-Tsefrekas
2. The property is a 1.27-acre lot located in the Medium Density Residential (R2)
Zoning District. The development is known as Pinewood Manor and has a
Homeowner‟s Association.
3. Currently Mr. Tsefrekas lives on the premises, Mrs. Trefrekas lives out-of-state.
4. The Zoning Administrator was copied on a letter (attached) sent to Alan Tsefrekas
from Brian Marcotte, Executive Vice-President of Pinewood Manor, Inc., dated
September 26, 2012, requesting that the pigs be removed from the premises. The
Zoning Administrator followed up with Mr. Marcotte, and was told that Mr.
Tsefrekas informed him that the pigs were no longer on the premises. Mr.
Marcotte provided the Zoning Administrator with the Association‟s Protective
Covenants. (see attached)
5. On 11/19/12, the police were called to the premises. Mrs. Tsefrekas was in
Vermont to obtain some of her possessions.
6. On 11/19/12, a voice message was left for the Zoning Administrator from Nancy
Tsefrekas, stating that her husband has brought a woman into the house and she
brought a massive amount of pigs onto the premises. Ms. Tsefrekas stated that
she witnessed seeing “at least 20 or 30 breeding pigs.” The Zoning Administrator
returned her call and Ms. Tseferkas reported that the tenant staying in the
homestead had several alias, namely: Cheryl Gruber, Florence C. Gruber and is
known in Arizona as Cheryl Whipple. Ms. Tsefrekas also complained that
chickens were back on the premises.
7. On 11/20/12, Lt. Douglas Babcock informed the Zoning Administrator that he
observed “at least 30 pigs” living inside the premises at 8 Valleyview Drive and
he provided her a copy of the incident report. The Zoning Administrator
confirmed that the incident report was a public document however she only
provided sections of the report that pertained to the pigs.
8. On 11/20/12, the Zoning Administrator issued a Notice of Violation by 1 st class
mail and certified mail. The certified mail card has not been returned to the
Community Development Department. The Notice of Violation was issued
pursuant to Article IV, Section 4.2 of the Town of Essex Zoning Regulations,
which does not allow for the raising or harboring of livestock unless the lot is a
certain size and town approvals have been obtained. Several pigs were on the
premises and living inside the dwelling.
9. On 11/27/12, the Zoning Administrator received a voice message from Alan
Tsefrekas informing her that he received the Notice of Violation regarding pigs
being on his property. Mr. Tsefrekas reported that the pigs were pot-bellied pigs
and considered domestic animals.
10. On 11/27/12, the Zoning Administrator received a call from Susan Magidson of
Pig Placement located in Pennsylvania. Ms. Magidson informed the Zoning
Administrator that she placed two of her pot-bellied pigs on the property in
July/August, 2012. Ms. Magidson wants her two pigs back and stated that they
could be identified as they had chips placed on them. Ms. Magidson was
Approved 3/7/13
7

320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
concerned for all of the pigs located on the premises and said that she is trying to
reach out to Mr. Tsefrekas to help him place the pigs.
11. On 11/28/12, Nancy Tsefrekas called to inform me that on 11/26/12 she witnessed
Mr. Tsefrekas taking waste out of the house and dumping it onto the back of their
lot which eventually leads to a ravine.
12. On 11/28/12, Susan Magidson called the Zoning Administrator to inform her that
she spoke with the tenant to report that a local vet was willing to neuter all the
male pigs at no charge, however, the tenant needed to consult with Mr. Tsefreskas
before agreeing to this arrangement.
13. On 11/28/12, the Zoning Administrator phoned Mr. Tsefrekas. Mr. Tsefrekas
said he was embarrassed by the situation – that the police came to his house and
that all this would be documented in the Essex Reporter. Mr. Tsefrekas informed
the Zoning Administrator that he planned to appeal the Notice of Violation on the
basis of pot-bellied pigs being domestic animals. The Zoning Administrator
explained the process and provided Mr. Tsefrekas with the Town‟s website
address and instructed him on downloading the application form as well as
referring him to the Zoning Regulations.
14. On 11/29/12, Mr. Tsefrekas stopped in to pick up the appeal paperwork. The
Zoning Administrator provided him the appeal form and a copy of Section 7.4,
Appeals of the Zoning Regs. Mr. Tsefrekas informed the Zoning Administrator
that his tenant owned most of the pigs and that she was selling them. The Zoning
Administrator asked Mr. Tsefrekas if his tenant was using his name to sell the
pigs. Mr. Tsefrekas replied that she was not.
15. On 11/30/12, the Zoning Administrator downloaded materials from a website
named CutiePigs.com. The literature shows that they are charging adoption fees
for the pigs. The literature states, under „Market Values‟, the lowest cost range
and high cost range for the pigs.
16. On 12/3/12 & 12/31/12, the Zoning Administrator emailed the State of Vermont
Environmental Compliance & Enforcement Division advising them of the
situation. In a reply email from Alayna Howard, she reported that the complaint
was still “open”.
17. On 12/6/12, an abutter called the Zoning Administrator to report that she has
observed her neighbor dumping litter boxes down the gully. In addition, the
caller reported that miscellaneous junk, including furniture has been placed
outside in the front yard and it continues to grow in collection, and that she has
seen about 6 or 7 chickens in the recent past but thought that a dog killed them.
18. In an email dated 12/7/12, to the Vermont Agricultural Department from the
Zoning Administrator, the question was posed if pot-bellied pigs were considered
an agricultural animal. In a reply email on the same date, Abbey Willard, Local
Foods Administrator, verified that pigs (including pot-bellied pigs) were defined
as „swine‟ and considered an agricultural animal. (Copy attached.)
19. On 12/10/12, the Zoning Administrator made telephone contact with Mr.
Tsefrekas. The Zoning Administrator relayed the additional concerns of items in
the front of the house; possible chickens on the site; and pig feces being dumped.
On this telephone call Mr. Tsefrekas informed the Zoning Administrator of the
following:
Approved 3/7/13
8

366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
Approved 3/7/13
He just returned from Court and was granted temporary custody of
the house and its belongings. The items on the front lawn
belonged to his estranged wife however he planned to move them
out of the front of the house and into a shed in the back of the
house.
He reported that he use to have chickens but there are no chickens
on the premises today.
He would clean up the area where litter box dumping occurred.
He is trying to get the pigs adopted so that the situation will
resolve itself.
20. On 12/19/12, the Zoning Administrator reached out to Kathee Ludwig of Green
Mountain Animal Defense. At this time, they were not sure what they could do,
but offered information if needed. See attached emails.
21. On 12/20/12, the Zoning Administrator emailed the State Department of Fire &
Safety notifying them of the situation and that the premise was being used as a
rental property. In a reply email to the Zoning Administrator dated 12/20/12, Joe
Benard, State Fire Marshall replied that they did not have jurisdiction because
they were informed that the tenant was the landowner‟s girlfriend. (see attached
emails)
22. On 12/20/12, the Zoning Administrator reached out to Joann Nichols of the
Chittenden County Human Society for any information or assistance that may be
given. The Zoning Administrator was informed that inhumane conditions would
need to be in place.
23. On 12/21/12, the Zoning Administrator & Town Planner inspected the premises
with Mr. Tsefrekas and Ms. Florence Gruber. Approximately 47 pigs (including
piglets) were on the premises. Substantial clean-up was in the process. See
attached pictures. There was no evidence of chickens on the site; the majority of
belongings outside of the front of the house had been removed and relocated to
inside a shed in the backyard; an uninspected vehicle was observed; an RV that
did not appear to be registered or inspected was on the site, however the owner is
working on providing documentation on its registration. Ms. Gruber stated that
some of the pigs on the premises were pregnant.
24. On 12/26/12, on a follow-up telephone discussion with Joann Nichols (CC
Human Society), the Zoning Administrator was informed that Ms. Nichols visited
the site and determined that no inhumane conditions existed; that she was working
with the tenant by placing an ad on the humane society face book page asking for
help with food, neutering, fostering and adopting the pigs. Ms. Nichols stated that
the Human Society did not have accommodations to take the pigs.
25. On 1/3/13, the Zoning Administrator spoke via telephone with Susan Magidson
(Pig Placement, Pennsylvania) and was advised that she is actively working with
Ms. Gruber to place the pigs. The Zoning Administrator reported that Ms.
Magidson advised her that she will continue to work with Ms. Gruber as long as
Ms. Gruber continues with neutering and spading the animals.
26. On 1/3/13, the Zoning Administrator spoke via telephone with Tammie Hartshorn
of New Hampshire. She stated that she has found placement for all of the pigs in
9

412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
New Hampshire. She stated that she could have them all removed from the
premises by Monday, January 7, 2013. She followed up with an email.
27. For the record, the Zoning Administrator listed the attachments that were
provided to the Zoning Board.
28. The Zoning Administrator advised the Board that the Town Attorney informed
her that the Board could grant a reasonable amount of time to remove the pigs
from the premises in a humane manner.
29. Testimony was received from Mr. Tsefrekas and Ms. Gruber that described the
circumstances on livestock versus pets.
30. The landowner and tenant is in the process of having the pigs and piglets removed
from the premises in an expedient and humanely manner.
31. The Board heard testimony from numerous neighbors and Brian Marcotte,
Executive Vice-President of Pinewood Manor, Inc., regarding the presence of
livestock on the property.
CONDITIONS:
1. By 12:01 a.m., January 22, 2013, all pigs and piglets must be removed from the
premises.
2. The Zoning Administrator shall inspect the premises on the morning of Tuesday,
January, 22, 2013 to ensure that all the pigs and piglets have been removed.
The MOTION passed 4-0-0.
AGENDA ITEM 1: ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
Edith Klimoski MOVED and Michael Plageman SECONDED a MOTION to
approve Hubert Norton as Chair; Michael Plageman as Vice-Chair; and Edith
Klimoski as Clerk. The MOTION passed 4-0-0.
AGENDA ITEM 3: MINUTES (12-6-12)
Edith Klimoski MOVED and Mitch Lefevre SECONDED a MOTION to approve
the 12/6/12 minutes with the following changes:
Line 40: Change “that what” to “then what.”
Line 50: Change “was located” to “is located.”
Line 52: Change “was a” to “is a.”
Line 87: Change “as one-bedrooms” to “as a one-bedroom unit.”
Line 118: Change “12‟ x 8‟” to “12‟ x 18‟.”
Line 120: Change “Any” to “An.”
Line 121: After “installed” add “on the westerly side of the parking lot.”
The MOTION passed 4-0-0.
AGENDA ITEM 4: Re-adoption of Operating Procedures:
Approved 3/7/13
10

458
459
460
461
462
463
464
ZBA Minutes January 3, 2013
The Board instructed the Zoning Administrator to make some edits to the document so
that it could be reviewed at its next meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
_______________________________
Hubert Norton, Chair
Approved 3/7/13
11