24.08.2013 Views

Perception, Knowledge and Aesthetics of biodiversity - Etech-Center ...

Perception, Knowledge and Aesthetics of biodiversity - Etech-Center ...

Perception, Knowledge and Aesthetics of biodiversity - Etech-Center ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

International Year <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity


<strong>Perception</strong>, knowledge <strong>and</strong> aesthetics <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>biodiversity</strong><br />

International Greening Education Event 2010<br />

29. October 2010<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Petra Lindemann-Matthies <strong>and</strong> FSR Dorothee Benkowitz<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Education, Karlsruhe


Structure <strong>of</strong> the talk<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant diversity<br />

Aesthetic preferences for single species<br />

Relationship between perception <strong>and</strong> aesthetic preferences<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> education on aesthetic preferences<br />

Species richness <strong>and</strong> human aesthetic well-being<br />

Relationship between species richness <strong>of</strong> a plant community<br />

<strong>and</strong> its attractiveness to humans


Structure <strong>of</strong> the talk<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant diversity<br />

Aesthetic preferences for single species<br />

Relationship between perception <strong>and</strong> aesthetic preferences<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> education on aesthetic preferences<br />

Species richness <strong>and</strong> human aesthetic well-being<br />

Relationship between species richness <strong>of</strong> a plant community<br />

<strong>and</strong> its attractiveness to humans


How many species are there on Earth?<br />

Mean estimation Actual number Factor<br />

overestimation<br />

381 Mill. ± 1.3x10 9 1 - 50 Mill. > 7.6<br />

Dunning 1997. The missing awareness, part 2: teaching students what a billion people<br />

looks like. Conservation Biology 11


Estimates <strong>of</strong> 600 university students<br />

Mean estimation Actual number Factor<br />

overestimation<br />

381 Mill. ± 1.3x10 9 1 - 50 Mill. > 7.6<br />

Widely inaccurate ideas <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> species („many“)<br />

Dunning 1997. The missing awareness, part 2: teaching students what a billion people<br />

looks like. Conservation Biology 11


Estimates <strong>of</strong> 600 university students<br />

Mean estimation Actual number Factor<br />

overestimation<br />

381 Mill. ± 1.3x10 9 1 - 50 Mill. > 7.6<br />

Widely inaccurate ideas <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> species („many“)<br />

Assumption: Loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> might not be perceived<br />

as a serious problem<br />

Dunning 1997. The missing awareness, part 2: teaching students what a billion people<br />

looks like. Conservation Biology 11


Estimation <strong>of</strong> plant species richness<br />

World Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

Alpine<br />

meadow<br />

Lawn Spruce<br />

forest<br />

100 x 100 m<br />

Beech<br />

forest<br />

200 adults und 200 grammar school students in Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

Lindemann-Matthies & Bose 2008. How many species are there? Public underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

<strong>and</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. Human Ecology 36


Estimation <strong>of</strong> plant species richness<br />

World Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

Alpine<br />

meadow<br />

Lawn Spruce<br />

forest<br />

Beech<br />

forest<br />

Minimum 200 100 10 1 2 2<br />

Maximum 1 x 10 15 4 x 10 9 1 x 10 9 2 x 10 9 1 x 10 6 1 x 10 8<br />

Median 3000000 94000 120 20 50 70<br />

Actual number 285000 3000 < 100 < 10 < 20 < 40<br />

Overestimation<br />

(median/real)<br />

10.5 31.3 1.2 2.0 2.5 1.8<br />

Lindemann-Matthies & Bose 2008. How many species are there? Public underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

<strong>and</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. Human Ecology 36


Estimation <strong>of</strong> plant species richness<br />

World Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

Alpine<br />

meadow<br />

Lawn Spruce<br />

forest<br />

Beech<br />

forest<br />

Minimum 200 100 10 1 2 2<br />

Maximum 1 x 10 15 4 x 10 9 1 x 10 9 2 x 10 9 1 x 10 6 1 x 10 8<br />

Median 3000000 94000 120 20 50 70<br />

Actual number 285000 3000 < 100 < 10 < 20 < 40<br />

Overestimation<br />

(median/real)<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> very different from reality<br />

10.5 31.3 1.2 2.0 2.5 1.8<br />

Loss might not be perceived as a serious problem at all<br />

Lindemann-Matthies & Bose 2008. How many species are there? Public underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

<strong>and</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. Human Ecology 36


Responses to the loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong><br />

Conceptions <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> species present<br />

Awareness <strong>of</strong> the seriousness <strong>of</strong> the threat <strong>of</strong> extinction<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> about species<br />

Relationship with species


Responses to the loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong><br />

Conceptions <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> species present<br />

Awareness <strong>of</strong> the seriousness <strong>of</strong> the threat <strong>of</strong> extinction<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> about species<br />

Relationship with species


“Without knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> relationships with the<br />

fellow beings who share our home place, we simply<br />

do not notice what happens to them.”<br />

Weilbacher 1993. Renaissance <strong>of</strong> the naturalist. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />

Education 25


Why conservationists should heed Pokémon<br />

Test: 109 children from the UK (age 4 – 11 years)<br />

Raichu, Pikachu, Hitokage Zenigame, Pikachu, Mini Ryuu<br />

10 pictures each (at r<strong>and</strong>om from 150) 10 pictures each (at r<strong>and</strong>om from 150)<br />

Balmford et al. 2002. Why conservationists should heed Pokémon. Science 295


Why conservationists should heed Pokémon<br />

Result:<br />

Raichu, Pikachu, Hitokage Zenigame, Pikachu, Mini Ryuu<br />

78% recognized 53% recognized<br />

Balmford et al. 2002. Why conservationists should heed Pokémon. Science 295


Conclusions <strong>of</strong> authors<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>of</strong> local organisms is poor<br />

Children can remember species / species names<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> the 150 artifical „species“ correctly identified<br />

Complicated names <strong>of</strong> „species“ were remembered<br />

Producers <strong>of</strong> pokémons know much better than the<br />

educational system how to raise interest in „species“<br />

Balmford et al. 2002. Why conservationists should heed Pokémon. Science 295


Lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge about local organisms: new<br />

phenomenon or old lamentation?<br />

„The almost total ignorance about the most common<br />

plants <strong>and</strong> animals, especially among the ladies, would be<br />

ridiculous if it were not so annoying.“<br />

Guenther 1910. Der Naturschutz. Freibung i. Br.: Fehsenfeld


<strong>Knowledge</strong> about species is lost<br />

Pilgrim et al. 2007. Ecological knowledge is lost in wealthier communities <strong>and</strong><br />

countries. Environmental Science & Technology 42


<strong>Knowledge</strong> about species is lost<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> about species no longer necessary for survival<br />

Pilgrim et al. 2007. Ecological knowledge is lost in wealthier communities <strong>and</strong><br />

countries. Environmental Science & Technology 42


High signal value<br />

Urtica dioica<br />

Toxicodendron radicans<br />

> 90% <strong>of</strong> study participants


Reasons for loss <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

Increasing loss <strong>of</strong> 'wild' habitats for outdoor play <strong>and</strong><br />

nature investigation activities (Louv 2006)<br />

Increasing parental concern: traffic danger, violence<br />

(Hüttenmoser 1996; Valentine & McKendrick 1997; Prezza et al. 2005; Robertson 2006)<br />

Increasing TV-, video consumption; children spend more<br />

time in the house than outside (McKendrick et al. 2000; Aitken 2001)


Reasons for loss <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

Increasing loss <strong>of</strong> 'wild' habitats for outdoor play <strong>and</strong><br />

nature investigation activities (Louv 2006)<br />

Increasing parental concern: traffic danger, violence<br />

(Hüttenmoser 1996; Valentine & McKendrick 1997; Prezza et al. 2005; Robertson 2006)<br />

Increasing TV-, video consumption; children spend more<br />

time in the house than outside (McKendrick et al. 2000; Aitken 2001)<br />

US: Children watch more than 4 hours daily TV <strong>and</strong><br />

spend less than 1 hour outside (Orr 2002)


Reasons for loss <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

Increasing loss <strong>of</strong> 'wild' habitats for outdoor play <strong>and</strong><br />

nature investigation activities (Louv 2006)<br />

Increasing parental concern: traffic danger, violence<br />

(Hüttenmoser 1996; Valentine & McKendrick 1997; Prezza et al. 2005; Robertson 2006)<br />

Increasing TV-, video consumption; children spend more<br />

time in the house than outside (McKendrick et al. 2000; Aitken 2001)<br />

Decrease <strong>of</strong> nature-related activities <strong>and</strong> fieldwork in<br />

school (Barker et al. 2002)


Structure <strong>of</strong> the talk<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant diversity<br />

Aesthetic preferences for single species<br />

Relationship between perception <strong>and</strong> aesthetic preferences<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> education on aesthetic preferences<br />

Species richness <strong>and</strong> human aesthetic well-being<br />

Relationship between species richness <strong>of</strong> a plant community<br />

<strong>and</strong> its attractiveness to humans


Attractive plants<br />

Plants with large, bright-coloured flowers or leaves<br />

Japanese Maple (Acer palmatum) favourite garden tree<br />

Genetic predisposition:<br />

Colour might have signalled „ripe fruits“<br />

Heerwagen & Orians 1993. Humans, habitats <strong>and</strong> aesthetics. In Kellert & Wilson<br />

(eds.) The Biophilia Hypothesis


Top 5 in Switzerl<strong>and</strong> in view <strong>of</strong> 6700 children<br />

Cat<br />

Dog<br />

Horse<br />

Squirrel<br />

Rabbit<br />

Rose<br />

Tulip<br />

Daffodil<br />

D<strong>and</strong>elion<br />

Daisy<br />

Lindemann-Matthies 2005. ‘Loveable’ mammals <strong>and</strong> ‘lifeless’ plants. International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Science Education 27


Can aesthetic preferences be influenced?<br />

Attractiveness <strong>of</strong> an organism has been found to be the main<br />

reason for children <strong>and</strong> adults to protect a species!<br />

Ashworth et al. 1995. Conservation <strong>of</strong> endangered species: what do children think?<br />

Environmental Education <strong>and</strong> Information 14


Structure <strong>of</strong> the talk<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant diversity<br />

Aesthetic preferences for single species<br />

Relationship between perception <strong>and</strong> aesthetic preferences<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> education on aesthetic preferences<br />

Species richness <strong>and</strong> human aesthetic well-being<br />

Relationship between species richness <strong>of</strong> a plant community<br />

<strong>and</strong> its attractiveness to humans


6800 children (8-14 years old) were asked:<br />

Which plants do you recognize on your way to school?<br />

Write down as many as you can.<br />

Which animals do you recognize on your way to school?<br />

Write down as many as you can.


6800 children (8-14 years old) were asked:<br />

Which plants do you recognize on your way to school?<br />

Write down as many as you can.<br />

Which animals do you recognize on your way to school?<br />

Write down as many as you can.<br />

Write down the plant you think to be most attractive.<br />

Write down the animal you think to be most attractive.


<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>and</strong> preferences<br />

Relationship between<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

preferences for species<br />

Appreciation <strong>of</strong> the plant group<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong> children (%)<br />

Appreciation <strong>of</strong> the animal group<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong> children (%)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

(a) Wild plants <strong>of</strong> Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (b) Garden or decorative plants<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Mean number <strong>of</strong> taxa listed per class<br />

(c) Wild animals <strong>of</strong> Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (d) Pet or useful animals<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

r = 0.41*** r = 0.29***<br />

100<br />

r = 0.48*** r = 0.29***<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Mean number <strong>of</strong> taxa listed per class<br />

Lindemann-Matthies 2005. ‘Loveable’ mammals <strong>and</strong> ‘lifeless’ plants. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Science<br />

Education 27


Educational programme<br />

Aim: Increase perception <strong>of</strong> local<br />

wild plant <strong>and</strong> animal species<br />

Outdoor investigation activities<br />

Experience nature with all senses


Experience <strong>of</strong> nature with all senses


Learning in familiar environment is effective<br />

"I got to know lichens. In the<br />

beginning I thought they were<br />

all chewing gum.“<br />

12 year old boy after investigating a stone wall


Education can influence aesthetic preferences<br />

Change in appreciation <strong>of</strong> wild plants<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong> children (%)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

r = 0.32***<br />

-4 0 4 8 12<br />

Change in mean number <strong>of</strong> wild plants listed<br />

Aesthetic preferences for local wild plant (<strong>and</strong> animal) species increased with<br />

familiarity<br />

Lindemann-Matthies 2005. ‘Loveable’ mammals <strong>and</strong> ‘lifeless’ plants. International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Science Education 27


Efforts <strong>of</strong> teachers were rewarded<br />

Preferences for local wild<br />

plant <strong>and</strong> animal species<br />

increased with number<br />

<strong>of</strong> lessons taught<br />

Change in proportion <strong>of</strong> children<br />

favouring wild plants (%)<br />

Change in proportion <strong>of</strong> children<br />

favouring wild animals (%)<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

-25<br />

-50<br />

-75<br />

-100<br />

0.1 1 10 100<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

-25<br />

-50<br />

-75<br />

(a) Wild plants <strong>of</strong> Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (b) Decorative or garden plants<br />

100<br />

r = 0.46***<br />

(c) Wild animals <strong>of</strong> Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (d) Pet animals<br />

r = 0.20***<br />

-100<br />

0.1 1 10 100<br />

Change in proportion <strong>of</strong> children<br />

favouring decorative or garden plants (%)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> lessons taught (log-scale)<br />

Change in proportion <strong>of</strong> children<br />

favouring pet animals (%)<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

-25<br />

-50<br />

-75<br />

-100<br />

0.1 1 10 100<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

-25<br />

-50<br />

-75<br />

-100<br />

0.1 1 10 100<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> lessons taught (log-scale)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

r = 0.36***<br />

r = 0.22***<br />

Lindemann-Matthies 2006. Investigating nature on the way to school. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Science<br />

Education 28


Summary<br />

Widely inaccurate ideas <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> species<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>of</strong> local organisms is poor, at least in highly<br />

industrialized countries<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> is directed towards few<br />

„loveable“ organisms<br />

Outdoor investigation activities in near-by natural places<br />

can increase students' perception <strong>and</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> species<br />

Link between perception <strong>and</strong> preferences => foster interest<br />

in <strong>and</strong> relationship with inconspicuous wild species


Structure <strong>of</strong> the talk<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant diversity<br />

Aesthetic preferences for single species<br />

Relationship between perception <strong>and</strong> aesthetic preferences<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> education on aesthetic preferences<br />

Species richness <strong>and</strong> human aesthetic well-being<br />

Relationship between species richness <strong>of</strong> a plant community<br />

<strong>and</strong> its attractiveness to humans


Nature (green trees) influences well-being<br />

Two groups <strong>of</strong> patients after gall<br />

bladder surgery<br />

Recovering in comparable rooms, but<br />

(a) view to a brick wall <strong>and</strong> (b) view to<br />

green trees<br />

Information taken from records:<br />

- Number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>of</strong> hospitalization<br />

- Number <strong>and</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> medizine<br />

each day<br />

- Complications<br />

- Nurses notes (other information)<br />

Ulrich 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224


Nature (green trees) influences well-being<br />

Patients with tree view had shorter postoperative hospital stays<br />

Took fewer strong analgesic doses <strong>and</strong> showed fewer complications<br />

Could leave the hospital earlier<br />

Ulrich 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224


Species richness influences psychological wellbeing<br />

Perceived stress recovery<br />

Transect <strong>of</strong> greenspaces<br />

through city <strong>of</strong> Sheffield<br />

Estimation <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

richness in greenspaces<br />

300 interviews in situ<br />

Opinion on different statements<br />

(scale 1 – 4), e.g. recovery from<br />

stress when looking at a site<br />

Fuller et al. 2007. Psychological benefits <strong>of</strong> greenspace increase with <strong>biodiversity</strong>.<br />

Biology Letters 3


Species richness influences psychological wellbeing<br />

Perceived stress recovery<br />

Transect <strong>of</strong> greenspaces<br />

through city <strong>of</strong> Sheffield<br />

Estimation <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

richness in greenspaces<br />

300 interviews in situ<br />

Opinion on different statements<br />

(scale 1 – 4), e.g. recovery from<br />

stress when looking at a site<br />

Does plant species richness influence our aesthetic well-being?<br />

Fuller et al. 2007. Psychological benefits <strong>of</strong> greenspace increase with <strong>biodiversity</strong>.<br />

Biology Letters 3


Structure <strong>of</strong> the talk<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant diversity<br />

Aesthetic preferences for single species<br />

Relationship between perception <strong>and</strong> aesthetic preferences<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> education on aesthetic preferences<br />

Species richness <strong>and</strong> human aesthetic well-being<br />

Relationship between species richness <strong>of</strong> a plant community<br />

<strong>and</strong> its attractiveness to humans


Aesthetic responses <strong>of</strong> the public to different diversity<br />

Manipulative experiments<br />

Field studies<br />

Photo surveys<br />

Survey in private gardens


Aesthetic responses <strong>of</strong> the public to different diversity<br />

Manipulative experiments<br />

Field studies<br />

Photo surveys<br />

Survey in private gardens


Manipulative experiments<br />

Selected: 67 typical grassl<strong>and</strong> species<br />

52 herbs und 15 grasses<br />

1500 plants in pots<br />

Plants arranged as "meadows" <strong>of</strong> different diversity


Study design<br />

Presentation <strong>of</strong> 5 meadows at the same time<br />

Experiment 1: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 species<br />

Experiment 2: 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 species<br />

Same evenness<br />

4 species 32 species 16 species 64 species 8 species<br />

To differentiate between effects <strong>of</strong> species diversity <strong>and</strong><br />

species identity: each day a different combination <strong>of</strong> plants<br />

Design similar to <strong>biodiversity</strong> experiments: Hector et al. 1999. Plant diversity <strong>and</strong><br />

productivity in European grassl<strong>and</strong>s. Science 286


Example <strong>of</strong> a meadow arrangement


Correlative field studies<br />

Canton Zurich Canton Grisons<br />

2 x 2 m 1 x 25 m


Study participants (n = 1500) should:<br />

Estimate number <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

in each "meadow"<br />

Assess their attractiveness:<br />

Experiments: Ranking (1 - 5)<br />

Field studies: Rating (1 - 6)


<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant species richness<br />

Experiment 1 Experiment 2<br />

Field study Zurich Field study Grisons<br />

Lindemann-Matthies et al. 2010. Experimental evidence for human preference <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>biodiversity</strong> in grassl<strong>and</strong> ecosystems. Biological Conservation 143


<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant species richness<br />

Experiment 1 Experiment 2<br />

Field study Zurich Field study Grisons<br />

People are able to<br />

distinguish between<br />

species-poor <strong>and</strong><br />

species-rich plant<br />

communities<br />

They overestimate<br />

species richness in<br />

low-diversity plots<br />

With increasing<br />

true species richness,<br />

the deviation<br />

increases


Aesthetic preferences<br />

Experiment 1 Experiment 2<br />

Field study Zurich Field study Grisons<br />

Lindemann-Matthies et al. 2010. Experimental evidence for human preference <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>biodiversity</strong> in grassl<strong>and</strong> ecosystems. Biological Conservation 143


Aesthetic preferences<br />

Experiment 1 Experiment 2<br />

Field study Zurich Field study Grisons<br />

Aesthetic appreciation<br />

increases<br />

with increasing<br />

plant species<br />

richness


Aesthetic preferences children<br />

Appreciation (mean rank)<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Adults<br />

Children<br />

1 2 4 8 16<br />

True species richness (log-scale)<br />

Already 6-year old children like species-rich meadows best<br />

=> Inherent appreciation <strong>of</strong> species richness


Effect <strong>of</strong> perceived <strong>and</strong> true species richness<br />

Additional effect <strong>of</strong> true species richness => unconscious effect?<br />

Lindemann-Matthies et al. 2010. Experimental evidence for human preference <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>biodiversity</strong> in grassl<strong>and</strong> ecosystems. Biological Conservation 143


Influence <strong>of</strong> individual species on appreciation<br />

Leucanthemum vulgare (positiv)<br />

Papaver rhoeas (positiv)<br />

Linaria vulgaris (positiv)<br />

Lolium perenne (negativ)<br />

=> Species richness more important than species identity


Favourite meadows<br />

Presentation <strong>of</strong> all plants used in<br />

experiments (800 plants, 54<br />

species) in Botanical Garden<br />

Zurich<br />

150 visitors were invited to create<br />

an attractive meadow (25 pots)


Influence <strong>of</strong> individual species on appreciation<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Mean = 17.2 species<br />

1 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 21 - 25<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

Assemblages (%)<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Mean = 34.2%<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong> flowering plants per assembled meadow (%)<br />

Lindemann-Matthies & Bose 2007. Species richness, structural diversity <strong>and</strong> species composition in<br />

meadows created by visitors <strong>of</strong> a botanical garden in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. L<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> Urban Planning 79


Meadows were<br />

Species-rich <strong>and</strong> rich in<br />

structural diversity<br />

Green matrix ...<br />

With some colourful flowers<br />

Lindemann-Matthies & Bose 2007. Species richness, structural diversity <strong>and</strong> species composition in<br />

meadows created by visitors <strong>of</strong> a botanical garden in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. L<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> Urban Planning 79


Summary<br />

Species richness <strong>of</strong> a community is powerful indicator <strong>of</strong> its<br />

aesthetic appeal to people<br />

No influence <strong>of</strong> socio-demographic factors on people’s<br />

aesthetic valuation <strong>of</strong> plant communities<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> some species had slight additional influence<br />

Argument for the conservation <strong>of</strong> species-rich communities<br />

in agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> settlement areas


Summary


Summary


Summary


Question<br />

Does schoolgarden work increase children‘s perception <strong>and</strong><br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong>?


Outline<br />

1. School gardening <strong>and</strong> the CBD<br />

2. School gardening as an access to<br />

<strong>biodiversity</strong><br />

3. Issue <strong>of</strong> research<br />

4. Design<br />

5. Results<br />

6. Summary<br />

7. Conclusion


1. School gardening <strong>and</strong> CBD<br />

CBD – Education <strong>and</strong><br />

Information<br />

Better <strong>biodiversity</strong><br />

education would meet one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the goals set out in the<br />

Convention (UNEP 2000)


1. School gardening <strong>and</strong> CBD<br />

CBD – Education <strong>and</strong><br />

Information<br />

Better <strong>biodiversity</strong><br />

education would meet one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the goals set out in the<br />

Convention (UNEP 2000)<br />

Vision <strong>of</strong> the German<br />

national strategy: Raising<br />

people’s appreciation <strong>of</strong><br />

biological diversity (BMU 2008)


Integration in the Educational System<br />

Affiliation with the UN-Decade<br />

„Education for Sustainable<br />

Development“ (BMU 2008)


Integration in the Educational System<br />

Affiliation with the UN-Decade<br />

„Education for Sustainable<br />

Development“ (BMU 2008)<br />

One appropriate action:<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> school gardens (ib.)


Integration in the Educational System<br />

Affiliation with the UN-Decade<br />

„Education for Sustainable<br />

Development“ (BMU 2008)<br />

One appropriate action:<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> school gardens (ib.)<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>and</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> species-richness should be<br />

promoted in childhood (Kahn 2002, Lindemann-Matthies 1999)


Results <strong>of</strong> previous studies:<br />

H<strong>and</strong>s-on experience with nature …<br />

… fosters the readiness to act ecosensitive<br />

(Lude 2001, Bögeholz 1999)


Results <strong>of</strong> previous studies:<br />

H<strong>and</strong>s-on experience with nature …<br />

… fosters the readiness to act ecosensitive<br />

(Lude 2001, Bögeholz 1999)<br />

… raises the perception <strong>and</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

(Pohl & Schrenk 2005, Lindemann-Matthies 1999, 2010)


Results <strong>of</strong> previous studies:<br />

H<strong>and</strong>s-on experience with nature …<br />

… fosters the readiness to act ecosensitive<br />

(Lude 2001, Bögeholz 1999)<br />

… raises the perception <strong>and</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

(Pohl & Schrenk 2005, Lindemann-Matthies 1999, 2010)<br />

Without instruction knowledge <strong>of</strong> species is very limited<br />

(Jäkel & Schaer 2004, Hesse 2002)


Results <strong>of</strong> previous studies:<br />

H<strong>and</strong>s-on experience with nature …<br />

… fosters the readiness to act ecosensitive<br />

(Lude 2001, Bögeholz 1999)<br />

… raises the perception <strong>and</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

(Pohl & Schrenk 2005, Lindemann-Matthies 1999, 2010)<br />

Without instruction knowledge <strong>of</strong> species is very limited<br />

(Jäkel & Schaer 2004, Hesse 2002)<br />

After regular work in school gardens over a period <strong>of</strong> only<br />

four years children were able to specify up to 75 plants<br />

(Schwier 2001)


Consequences:<br />

Childhood is an appropriate<br />

starting point in the search<br />

for long-term solutions to<br />

species loss <strong>and</strong> habitat<br />

degradation (Kahn 2002)


Consequences:<br />

Childhood is an appropriate<br />

starting point in the search<br />

for long-term solutions to<br />

species loss <strong>and</strong> habitat<br />

degradation (Kahn 2002)<br />

Children need opportunities to assume responsibility for<br />

environmental areas where they can have a direct impact<br />

on it (Helldén 1997)


2. School gardening as an access to<br />

<strong>biodiversity</strong>


Number <strong>of</strong> plant species in school gardens<br />

School garden Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Species<br />

(Inngauer 2008)<br />

Area (m 2 ) Plant Family<br />

Garden A 76 214 35<br />

Garden B 111 136 43<br />

Garden C - flowerbed 90 421 37<br />

Garden C - herbary 52 212 27<br />

University Garden 336 1450 76<br />

Aggregated 406 / 83


School garden as authentic learning environment<br />

Learning as an…<br />

• active<br />

• self-regulated<br />

• constructive<br />

• emotional<br />

• situational<br />

•social<br />

…process<br />

(Reinmann & M<strong>and</strong>l 2006)


3. Issue <strong>of</strong> research<br />

Does school gardening produce an effect on the<br />

perception <strong>and</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> plant <strong>biodiversity</strong>?


Selected hypotheses:<br />

School gardening …<br />

1. … raises the perception <strong>of</strong> plant species


Selected hypotheses:<br />

School gardening …<br />

1. … raises the perception <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

2. … fosters the aesthetic valuation <strong>of</strong> species-richness


Selected hypotheses:<br />

School gardening …<br />

1. … raises the perception <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

2. … fosters the aesthetic valuation <strong>of</strong> species-richness<br />

3. … increases the knowledge <strong>of</strong> plant species


Selected hypotheses:<br />

School gardening …<br />

1. … raises the perception <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

2. … fosters the aesthetic valuation <strong>of</strong> species-richness<br />

3. … increases the knowledge <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

4. Factors other than school education are important to<br />

achieve knowledge <strong>of</strong> species (e.g. parents, media)


Selected hypotheses:<br />

School gardening …<br />

1. … raises the perception <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

2. … fosters the aesthetic valuation <strong>of</strong> species-richness<br />

3. … increases the knowledge <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

4. Factors other than school education are important to<br />

achieve knowledge <strong>of</strong> species (e.g. parents, media)<br />

5. Taxonomic knowledge positively influences the<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> plant species richness in a meadow


4. Design<br />

The „meadow experiment“<br />

Meadow-like arrays <strong>of</strong> different diversity:<br />

(49 flowerpots per box)<br />

8 2 16 4


8-species-meadow<br />

A 18 Alopecurus pratensis<br />

8 Dactylis glomerata<br />

4 Arrhenatherum elatius<br />

4 Veronica chamaedrys<br />

3 Trifolium pratense<br />

3 Leucanthemum vulgare<br />

5 Lychnis flos-cuculi<br />

4 Vicia cracca


Methods<br />

Structured one-to-one interviews<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ardised questionnaires with open <strong>and</strong> closed-ended<br />

questions<br />

Child-oriented activities (meadow experiment, sorting <strong>of</strong><br />

plants according to likeness or development stage)<br />

Videotaping<br />

Transcription (VIDEOGRAPH, IPN 2008)<br />

Data interpretation (SPSS 18)


Study participants<br />

n = 136 urban rural <br />

with* 66 55 11 37 29<br />

without* 70 56 14 43 27<br />

Primary school children with/without *school garden experience


Study design<br />

March / May 2007<br />

14 months<br />

May / July 2008<br />

Test group Control group<br />

Pretest<br />

+ teacher<br />

School gardening<br />

+ protocol<br />

Posttest<br />

+ teachers<br />

+ parents<br />

Pretest<br />

+ teacher<br />

Classroom instruction<br />

+ protocol<br />

Posttest<br />

+ teachers<br />

+ parents


The meadow experiment<br />

4 species<br />

11 species


5. Results<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> species (posttest)<br />

N = 136<br />

* school garden experience


St<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> the difference<br />

N = 136<br />

* school garden<br />

experience


Favourite meadow<br />

N = 136<br />

Effects: choice <strong>of</strong> pretest***, number <strong>of</strong> bloomers***, cv growth hight***, SG***<br />

r 2 = 0.5


Favourite meadow – without garden experience<br />

N = 70<br />

Effects: choice in the pretest***, number <strong>of</strong> bloomers***, cv growth height***, SG***<br />

r 2 = 0.5


Favourite meadow – with garden experience<br />

N = 66<br />

Effects: choice in pretest***, bloomers***, cv <strong>of</strong> growth height***, time spend<br />

in SG**, diversity in the SG*** r 2 = 0.87


Favourite meadow – boys <strong>and</strong> girls<br />

Children with school garden experience<br />

N = 66


Reasons for their choice<br />

Other: growth height, grass …<br />

N = 136


10.11.2010


Appreciation <strong>of</strong> the meadows<br />

☺<br />

<br />

<br />

N = 136<br />

Effects: number <strong>of</strong> species***, number <strong>of</strong> bloomers**, growth height***<br />

16-species-mark * SG: p < .035*<br />

*school garden<br />

experience


Reasons for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the 16 speciesmeadow<br />

SG * diversity p < .06<br />

* school garden experience<br />

N = 61


<strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant species (posttest)<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> * SG p < .015*<br />

N = 136<br />

* school<br />

garden<br />

experience<br />

Effects: precognition***, plant details***, parents*, SG**, books about plants*<br />

r 2 = 0.7


<strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>of</strong> plant species <strong>and</strong> estimate<br />

Estimate <strong>of</strong> the 16 species * knowledge <strong>of</strong> plants p < .025*<br />

N = 136


6. Summary<br />

1. School gardening has a slight positive influence on the<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> plant diversity


6. Summary<br />

1. School gardening has a slight positive influence on the<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> plant diversity<br />

2. School gardening fosters the aesthetic appreciation <strong>of</strong><br />

species richness (p < 0.001)


6. Summary<br />

1. School gardening has a slight positive influence on the<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> plant diversity<br />

2. School gardening fosters the aesthetic appreciation <strong>of</strong><br />

species richness (p < 0.001)<br />

Most children preferred species-rich arrangements<br />

Test group scored significantly higher in preference for<br />

the species-rich arrangements than control group<br />

Test group explained their preference with species<br />

richness


3. School gardening fosters taxonomic knowledge<br />

(significant difference between test <strong>and</strong> control<br />

group)


3. School gardening fosters taxonomic knowledge<br />

(significant difference between test <strong>and</strong> control<br />

group)<br />

4. Factors other than school play a significant role in<br />

fostering knowledge <strong>of</strong> plant names (parents, books<br />

about plants)


3. School gardening fosters taxonomic knowledge<br />

(significant difference between test <strong>and</strong> control<br />

group)<br />

4. Factors other than school play a significant role in<br />

fostering knowledge <strong>of</strong> plant names (parents, books<br />

about plants)<br />

5. With increasing taxonomic knowledge, deviation<br />

between real <strong>and</strong> estimated number <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

decreases (8 <strong>and</strong> 16 species-meadows)


7. Conclusion<br />

With time, school-garden work can foster the perception<br />

<strong>and</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> plant diversity.


7. Conclusion<br />

With time, school-garden work can foster the perception<br />

<strong>and</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> plant diversity.<br />

We need to engage<br />

children in constructivist<br />

environmental education to<br />

maximize their exploration<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> interaction with the<br />

nature that still exists within<br />

their purview.<br />

(Kahn 2002)


Thank you for your attention!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!