24.08.2013 Views

Hydro Intag – A case of green project finance in Ecuador

Hydro Intag – A case of green project finance in Ecuador

Hydro Intag – A case of green project finance in Ecuador

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E C OE N E R G I A<br />

CorporaciónToisán<br />

Sept 2011


Contents:<br />

1. <strong>Intag</strong>’s socio-environmental context<br />

2. Susta<strong>in</strong>able economic alternatives for the<br />

management and development <strong>of</strong> the river <strong>Intag</strong>’s<br />

bas<strong>in</strong><br />

3. The <strong>project</strong> Hidro<strong>in</strong>tag<br />

4. Proposal for implementation 2011 - 2015


Orig<strong>in</strong>al vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ecuador</strong> Remnant vegetation <strong>in</strong><br />

1996<br />

<strong>Intag</strong><br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Environmental importance:<br />

600 Km2 <strong>of</strong> primary forest.<br />

420 Km2 under protection<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


<strong>Hydro</strong>logical importance:<br />

25 water bas<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Biological importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Intag</strong>. Ecoregion “Choco<strong>–</strong>Tropical Andes”<br />

• “Hot Spot”: one <strong>of</strong> the places with the<br />

highest biodiversity and endemism on<br />

earth<br />

• Refuge <strong>of</strong> many animals <strong>in</strong> danger <strong>of</strong><br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction (Andean bear, spider monkey,<br />

jaguar)<br />

• Highly endangered<br />

INTAG


Socio-economic importance<br />

• 17.000 Inhabitants<br />

• Agricultural economy:<br />

• Gra<strong>in</strong>s: corn and beans<br />

• Livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Sugar Cane<br />

à Food sovereignty<br />

Unsatisfied needs<br />

- Communications - Roads<br />

- Education <strong>–</strong> Health care


Threats<br />

- degradation <strong>of</strong> ecosystems<br />

- erosion, loss <strong>of</strong> soil fertility<br />

- loss <strong>of</strong> biodiversity<br />

- ext<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>of</strong> species<br />

- low agricultural productivity<br />

- migration and poverty<br />

- expansion <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

border<br />

- conventional agriculture<br />

- Slash and burn practices /<br />

high usage <strong>of</strong><br />

agrochemicals<br />

- <strong>in</strong>vasions on forest heritage<br />

and protected forests<br />

- deforestation


large-scale m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

1980-1985: first explorations by<br />

the Belgium cooperation CTB<br />

1990-1997: exploration by the<br />

Japanese cooperation JICA<br />

1996: Environmental Impact<br />

Assessment (EIA)<br />

1.997 expulsion <strong>of</strong> Mitsubishi<br />

2003: illegal concession for<br />

Ascendant Copper Canada<br />

2008: M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g mandate - National<br />

Assembly<br />

Retreat <strong>of</strong> Ascendant Copper


The m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>project</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g to the EIA <strong>of</strong> JICA<br />

• 318 million tons <strong>of</strong> low-grade ore<br />

• 0.7% copper (2.2 million tons <strong>of</strong> pure copper)<br />

• per each metric ton <strong>of</strong> extracted material, 7 Kg copper will be obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

• residues: 315 million tons <strong>of</strong> material


Achievements <strong>of</strong> the social resistance process<br />

• Pacific resistance aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

human rights violations<br />

• Regional environmental<br />

conscience<br />

• Retreat <strong>of</strong> 2 mult<strong>in</strong>ational<br />

m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g companies<br />

• withdrawal <strong>of</strong> 23 illegal<br />

m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g concessions<br />

• Legal actions aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

TSX<br />

• National debate about<br />

extractive <strong>in</strong>dustries


From resistance to suggestions <strong>–</strong> social organizational process<br />

CorporaciónToisán • Asociación de Caficultores Río <strong>Intag</strong> -<br />

AACRI<br />

• Defensa y Conservación Ecológica de<br />

<strong>Intag</strong> - DECOIN<br />

• Cord<strong>in</strong>adora de Mujeres de <strong>Intag</strong> - CMI<br />

• Corporación de Talleres del Gran Valle de<br />

Manduriacos - CTGV<br />

• Red Ecoturística de <strong>Intag</strong> - REI<br />

• Corporación de productores de granos<br />

<strong>Intag</strong> Sustentable - CORPAIS<br />

• Corporación de productores de lácteos <strong>Intag</strong> Leche - CORPIL<br />

• Asociación de Campes<strong>in</strong>os Agroecológicos de <strong>Intag</strong> - ACAI<br />

• Cooperativa de crédito asociativo - CORDESPRO - INTAG<br />

• Red de Bosques Comunitarios de <strong>Intag</strong><br />

• Casa Palabra y Pueblo


Answers and proposals <strong>of</strong> the organized civil society<br />

• Agro forestry organic<br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

• Dairy production <strong>in</strong> silvo<br />

pastures<br />

• Production <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

local gra<strong>in</strong><br />

• Agro <strong>in</strong>dustries &<br />

handicrafts<br />

150 ton/year<br />

4.000 lit/day<br />

200 ton /year<br />

180.000 $/year<br />

• Ecotourism 4.000 pas/year<br />

• Local micr<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>ance<br />

• Watershed conservation<br />

150.000 $/year<br />

45 reserves<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Projects<br />

10 year goals<br />

Amount Employment Incomes $/year<br />

Organic c<strong>of</strong>fee 3.375 ton/year 3.000 11.250.000<br />

Dairy production 45.000 lit/day 1.000 4.106.250<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

local gra<strong>in</strong><br />

Agro <strong>in</strong>dustries and<br />

handicrafts<br />

1.350 ton/year 3.500 1.050.000<br />

450.000 $/year 200 450.000<br />

Ecotourism 30.000 pass/year 250 1.350.000<br />

Local micr<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>ance 5.000.000 $/year 25 600.000<br />

Watershed conservation 78 reserves 234 --<br />

Forest corridors 1.000 Km2 145 ---<br />

8.354 18.806.250


Hidro<strong>Intag</strong> Project<br />

Communitarian management and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intag</strong>´s watershed<br />

through micro hydroelectric generation,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to environmental and social<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> the local communities and<br />

their organizations


Conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> forests<br />

Watershedmanagement<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

Generation<br />

<strong>of</strong> electricity<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>vestment:<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure,<br />

economic<br />

development,<br />

conservation<br />

Sell<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the<br />

national<br />

system<br />

Fiduciary<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Investors<br />

Enterprise Management Model<br />

Public Sector:<br />

Local governments:<br />

• Juntas Parroquiales <strong>of</strong> <strong>Intag</strong> (7)<br />

• Prov<strong>in</strong>cial gvnt <strong>of</strong> Imbabura<br />

Mixed Economy<br />

Company<br />

Consortium<br />

public - communitarian<br />

Communitarian Sector :<br />

Corporación Toisán:<br />

- 9 organizations from 46<br />

communities and 1700 families<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Steps taken until the actualitty<br />

• 2006: identification and design<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>project</strong>, <strong>in</strong>stitutional approvals<br />

• 2007: 1 st technical mission from cuba solar à<br />

watershed diagnosis <strong>–</strong> 30 potential location<br />

• 2008 <strong>–</strong> 2012: national and French technical<br />

team à 3 prefeasibility studies, local people<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, watershed monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• 2011 Redef<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g management model


Cuba Solar -<br />

Cuba<br />

• Renewable<br />

Energy<br />

• Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Technical<br />

evaluation<br />

The technical team <strong>of</strong> Hidro<strong>Intag</strong>:<br />

National team <strong>of</strong><br />

Hidro<strong>Intag</strong><br />

• Technical studies<br />

• Environmental studies<br />

• eng<strong>in</strong>eer Ricardo<br />

Buitrón (ex INECEL)<br />

• 8 national experts<br />

CCAS - ESF -<br />

France<br />

• Expert studies<br />

<strong>–</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Selection Criteria<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> the precautionary pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>in</strong>to<br />

environmental, cultural and economical aspects<br />

Rejection <strong>of</strong> one <strong>project</strong> to avoid the possible change <strong>of</strong> a<br />

natural thermal stream<br />

Reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stalled potency to<br />

keep the ecological<br />

caudal over 20% <strong>in</strong><br />

Toabuchi <strong>project</strong><br />

Modification <strong>of</strong> many<br />

<strong>project</strong>s accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

cultural criteria<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Selection Criteria<br />

To prioritize harmony with<br />

touristic and agricultural<br />

activities from the region :<br />

Priority was given to the scenic<br />

waterfall <strong>in</strong> order not to alter a<br />

possible tourism <strong>project</strong><br />

We ruled out a microhydro to<br />

avoid opposition to tourist<br />

development model l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />

the river<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g program for access to skilled employment<br />

• 94 students graduated <strong>in</strong><br />

2010<br />

• 25 students <strong>in</strong> 2011 studies<br />

• $ 35,000 <strong>in</strong>vested<br />

• Topography<br />

• <strong>Hydro</strong>logy<br />

• SIG<br />

• Civil Construcciones<br />

• Cater<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

restaurant


Energy System Hidro<strong>in</strong>tag - Cotacachi<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intag</strong> watersheds<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


E C OE N E R G I A<br />

Total <strong>project</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment budget<br />

ITEM DESCRIPTION VALUE<br />

1 Civil works 53.901.496<br />

2 Mechanical equipments 3.630.000<br />

3 Electrical and comunicational equipment 11.187.500<br />

4 Generation equipment 55.353.150<br />

5 Transmission l<strong>in</strong>e 11.385.000<br />

6 Environmental mitigation 2.018.450<br />

7 Community improvemnt works 300.000<br />

Total Construction Works 137.775.596<br />

8 Studies and designs 2.187.000<br />

9 Permits and licencess 675.000<br />

10 Environmental costs 1.155.000<br />

Pre-<strong>in</strong>vestment costs 4.017.000<br />

11 Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and adm<strong>in</strong>istration 8.248.525<br />

12 Prog. Qulified local employment access 890.550<br />

13 Cont<strong>in</strong>gency 5.998.229<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and management<br />

15.137.30<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> the <strong>project</strong> 156.929.900


E C OE N E R G I A<br />

Replac<strong>in</strong>g fossil fuels


PRINCIPLE PROJECT DATA<br />

<strong>Hydro</strong>logy:<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> river<br />

Bas<strong>in</strong> area (Km2)<br />

Average flow (m3/s)<br />

Design flow(m3/s)<br />

Project swell<strong>in</strong>g flow (Tr 100 years<br />

(m3/s):<br />

Reservoir<br />

Type<br />

Maxium normal level (masl)<br />

Chalguayacu<br />

88<br />

4,5<br />

9<br />

180<br />

Daily<br />

regulation<br />

807<br />

Maxium normal level (masl) 795<br />

Available volume 100


Dam<br />

Type<br />

arc and gravity<br />

concrete<br />

Crown<strong>in</strong>g elevation 810<br />

Length (m) 120<br />

Maxium heght (m) 10 -- 12<br />

Elevation top <strong>of</strong> spilway 807<br />

Lenght (m) top <strong>of</strong> spillway 50<br />

Bottom dra<strong>in</strong>s 2<br />

Radial floodgates BxH (m) 2+2,5<br />

Conduction tunnel<br />

Diameter (m) 2,5<br />

Lenght (m) 200<br />

Equilibrium Chimney<br />

Underground<br />

Height (m) 35<br />

Pressure Pippes<br />

Surface <strong>in</strong> PRV<br />

Diameter (m) 2<br />

Length (m) 300<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>e room<br />

Above ground<br />

Installed powe (mw) 7<br />

Turb<strong>in</strong>e 2 Francis<br />

Net fall <strong>of</strong> design (m) 107<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


E C OE N E R G I A


E C OE N E R G I A


E C OE N E R G I A


1st Phase Process<br />

1 small hydroelectric<br />

Chalguayacu 7 Mw<br />

1. Completion <strong>of</strong> feasibility and detailed<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g studies <strong>of</strong> the Chalguayacu 7 Mw<br />

hydroelectric<br />

2. Construction and commission<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

central<br />

3. Completion <strong>of</strong> feasibility studies <strong>of</strong> next 3 small<br />

hydroelectric:<br />

• Nangulví 7 Mw<br />

• Pamplona 8 Mw<br />

• Manduriaco grande 6 Mw<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


1st phase <strong>in</strong>vestment required<br />

Chalguayacu 7 Mw<br />

Estimated time: 18 month<br />

Total Consortium <strong>in</strong>vestment required: $ 8.500.000<br />

Investors<br />

6.500.000 2.000.000<br />

• loan from State bank: 1.500.000<br />

• loan from ethic bank: 4.500.000<br />

• own from CT: 500.000<br />

Estimated pr<strong>of</strong>its: $ 2.800.000 /year<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> Return on Investment (ROI): 21%<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


2nd Phase Process<br />

1. Detailed eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, construction and<br />

commission<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> next three hydroelectric<br />

21 Mw power:<br />

• Nangulví 7 Mw<br />

• Pamplona 8 Mw<br />

• Manduriaco grande 6 Mw<br />

2. Feasibility studies <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intag</strong> 60 Mw<br />

hydroelectric<br />

3. Design and detailed eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>Intag</strong> 60<br />

Mw<br />

E C OE N E R G I A


1st phase<br />

2nd phase<br />

3th phase<br />

E C OE N E R G I A<br />

Central & works<br />

Río Chlaguayacu 7 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

Commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Río Nangulví 7 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

Commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Río Pamplona 8 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

Commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Río Manduriaco grande 6 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

Commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Río <strong>Intag</strong> 60 Mw<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al designs<br />

Procurement <strong>of</strong> Works<br />

Construction<br />

años 1 años 2 años 3 años 4 años 5<br />

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4


E C OE N E R G I A<br />

Muchas Gracias

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!