5th Annual Conference Nice - European-microfinance.org
5th Annual Conference Nice - European-microfinance.org
5th Annual Conference Nice - European-microfinance.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
34<br />
5 th <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Nice</strong><br />
(i.e. interest rates charged, current loan officer productivity) and product mix (i.e. a high<br />
reliance on contractual income negatively affects the operational sustainability ratio).<br />
So far we have assumed that the MFIs have access to interest free capital for on-lending.<br />
However, a potentially very important barrier for the expansion and future sustainability of<br />
the sector may be the availability of lending capital. Currently the MFI sector is not able to<br />
offer deposit services, except on an agency basis, and even if they were, it is questionable the<br />
extent to which the funds raised through medium and long-term savings products would be<br />
able to significantly contribute towards loan capital.<br />
Chart 4 displays the size of the gap in funding (expressed in £‘000) to support a 10% annual<br />
growth in their personal loan portfolio using best-practice approaches (e.g. in terms of<br />
interest rates, productivity and home improvement loans), once the MFIs have recycled their<br />
existing loan capital (i.e. the opening balance at the beginning of 2007/2008). Here we<br />
exclude the capital requirements for the home improvement loan given that there are<br />
particular funding arrangement in which it is given that the MFI borrows to on-lend part of<br />
the home improvement loans.<br />
£'000<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
Chart 4: Future capital requirements<br />
07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14<br />
MFI A MFI B MFI C MFI D<br />
The chart reveals that even if the MFIs were to implement best practice there would still be a<br />
considerable funding gap. Already in Year 1 (2007/2008), MFI A experiences a six-digit<br />
funding gap, whilst MFI C has a shortfall of £75,000. The figures for MFI B are similar to<br />
MFI C, whilst MFI D first experiences funding shortages in year 2011/2012 because of its<br />
slower projected volume growth in personal loans and considerable reserves.<br />
The future capital requirements for MFI A are considerably greater than those of the other<br />
MFIs, because of the much greater scale of its operation. For example, according to our<br />
projections, MFI A will lend out more than £1 million in personal loans alone in year 1<br />
(2007/2008) and over £3.5 million in year 7 (2013/2014). In comparison, MFI C will make<br />
loans (business and personal loans) for less than £350,000 in year 1 and less than £900,000<br />
in year 7. This would suggest that a recapitalisation strategy based exclusively on recycling<br />
existing loan capital is not a viable means of supporting the expansion of the sector. The<br />
sector remains dependent on raising funds through grants, contract income and through<br />
borrowing loan capital.