Functionalism

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Searle inside the robot
Searle’s response to the Robot Reply 1) The robot reply admits that there is more to understanding than mere symbol manipulation. 2) The robot reply still doesn’t work. Imagine that I am in the head of the robot. I have no contact with the perceptions or actions of the robot. I still only manipulate symbols. I still have no understanding. Counter-response to Searle’s response Combine the robot reply with the systems reply. The robot as a whole understands Chinese, even though Searle does not.
Page 1 and 2: Functionalism Some context from: St
Page 3 and 4: Functionalism defined as inputs and
Page 5 and 6: No matter if you interpret function
Page 7 and 8: The Chinese Room Argument
Page 9 and 10: The Turing Test In 1950, a computer
Page 11 and 12: Searle’s Chinese Room Argument Jo
Page 13 and 14: Summary of Searle’s Chinese Room
Page 15 and 16: Grailog: Classes, Instances, Relati
Page 17 and 18: • Searle concludes that symbol ma
Page 19 and 20: The Systems Reply Objections Searle
Page 21: The Robot Reply What if the whole s
Page 25 and 26: Complexity changes everything. Our
Page 27 and 28: Searle’s criticism of strong AI
Page 29 and 30: animate inanimate Instances tangibl
Page 31 and 32: A theory claiming two assertions ov
Page 33 and 34: 2) Functionalism Functionalists can
Page 35 and 36: 4) Syntax vs. Semantics • How can
Page 37 and 38: 6) Searle claims that only biologic
Page 39: On the Chinese Room: More optional

Functionalism

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?