Functionalism

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Possible Response to the Complexity Reply 1) See Response to the Systems Reply 2) Where would be the quantitative-qualitative transition? Counter-response to that response What would happen if Searle’s Chinese-speaking subsystem would become as complex as the English-speaking rest of his linguistic mind?
Searle’s criticism of strong AI’s mind-program analogy Searle’s criticism of strong AI’s analogy mind is to brain as program is to computer seems justified since “mental states and events are literally a product of the operation of the brain, but the program is not in that way a product of the computer”.
Page 1 and 2: Functionalism Some context from: St
Page 3 and 4: Functionalism defined as inputs and
Page 5 and 6: No matter if you interpret function
Page 7 and 8: The Chinese Room Argument
Page 9 and 10: The Turing Test In 1950, a computer
Page 11 and 12: Searle’s Chinese Room Argument Jo
Page 13 and 14: Summary of Searle’s Chinese Room
Page 15 and 16: Grailog: Classes, Instances, Relati
Page 17 and 18: • Searle concludes that symbol ma
Page 19 and 20: The Systems Reply Objections Searle
Page 21 and 22: The Robot Reply What if the whole s
Page 23 and 24: Searle’s response to the Robot Re
Page 25: Complexity changes everything. Our
Page 29 and 30: animate inanimate Instances tangibl
Page 31 and 32: A theory claiming two assertions ov
Page 33 and 34: 2) Functionalism Functionalists can
Page 35 and 36: 4) Syntax vs. Semantics • How can
Page 37 and 38: 6) Searle claims that only biologic
Page 39: On the Chinese Room: More optional

Functionalism

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?