Lexical variation in aggregate perspective
Lexical variation in aggregate perspective
Lexical variation in aggregate perspective
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
qnp.be.e.0<br />
qnp.be.e.1<br />
qnp.be.p.0<br />
qnp.be.p.1<br />
qnp.nl.e.0<br />
<strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>variation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>aggregate</strong> <strong>perspective</strong> 115<br />
qnp.nl.e.1<br />
qnp.nl.p.0<br />
rechtbank 122 112 61 70 15 27 9 13 1 4 11 21 2 2 52 64<br />
prof 1 2 3 3 1 2 0 0 1 1 5 5 0 3 8 6<br />
professor 39 33 70 72 3 8 6 6 0 0 9 3 7 3 27 36<br />
fout 74 84 154 158 51 65 25 43 38 17 92 74 87 75 326 299<br />
overtred<strong>in</strong>g 15 14 25 40 6 8 4 9 1 0 9 10 2 2 12 26<br />
publiciteit 9 6 5 6 16 18 9 11 0 0 4 5 2 1 17 14<br />
reclame 60 45 17 32 21 21 15 12 11 5 18 11 30 43 46 51<br />
proper 8 10 14 20 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 3 2 2 1 4<br />
schoon 7 10 10 12 29 21 13 11 0 2 7 3 2 4 66 85<br />
fier 1 4 15 13 1 4 0 1 3 0 5 6 0 0 1 1<br />
trots 15 19 25 25 22 32 11 16 2 0 9 9 2 3 69 63<br />
schepen 11 14 49 24 7 4 2 1 0 0 11 3 0 0 4 1<br />
wethouder 0 0 1 4 9 13 11 14 0 0 2 2 0 0 22 22<br />
schrijvelaar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Rekenhof 12 15 6 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Rekenkamer 6 7 10 3 17 33 4 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />
References<br />
Auer, Peter. 2005. Europe’s sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard<br />
constellations. In Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds.), Perspectives<br />
on <strong>variation</strong>, 7–42. Berl<strong>in</strong> and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.<br />
Baeza-Yates, Ricardo and Berthier Ribeiro-Neto. 1999. Modern <strong>in</strong>formation retrieval. New York:<br />
ACM Press & Addison-Wesley.<br />
Bickerton, Derek.1971. Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language and Cognitive<br />
Processes 7(4). 457–492.<br />
Bouma, Gerlof, Gertjan van Noord, and Rob Malouf. 2001. Alp<strong>in</strong>o: wide-coverage computational<br />
analysis of Dutch. In Walter Daelemans, K. Sima’an, J.Veenstra & J. Zavrel (eds.), Computational<br />
L<strong>in</strong>guistics <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands 2000, 45–59. Amsterdam: Rodopi.<br />
Clyne, Michael. 1992. Pluricentric languages: Differ<strong>in</strong>g norms <strong>in</strong> different nations. Berl<strong>in</strong>andNew<br />
York: Mouton de Gruyter.<br />
Cox, Trevor and Michael Cox. 2001. Multidimensional scal<strong>in</strong>g. London and New York: Chapman<br />
and Hall.<br />
Edmonds, Philip and Graeme Hirst. 2002. Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational L<strong>in</strong>guistics<br />
28(2). 105–144.<br />
Fillmore, Charles.1994. Start<strong>in</strong>g where dictionaries stop: the challenge of corpus lexicography.<br />
In Beryl T. Sue Atk<strong>in</strong>s & Antonio Zampolli (eds.), Computational approaches to the lexicon,<br />
349–393. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2009. <strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>variation</strong> <strong>in</strong> space. In Jürgen Erich Schmidt & Peter Auer (eds.),<br />
Language and space I: Theories and methods, 821–837. Berl<strong>in</strong> and New York: Mouton de<br />
Gruyter.<br />
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Schmidt redux: How systematic is the l<strong>in</strong>guistic system if <strong>variation</strong> is rampant?<br />
In Kasper Boye & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds.), Language usage and language<br />
structure, 237–262. Berl<strong>in</strong> & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.<br />
qnp.nl.p.1<br />
use.be.e.0<br />
use.be.e.1<br />
use.be.p.0<br />
use.be.p.1<br />
use.nl.e.0<br />
use.nl.e.1<br />
use.nl.p.0<br />
use.nl.p.1
Change language