The Use of Wetlands for Flood Attenuation FINAL REPORT - An Taisce
The Use of Wetlands for Flood Attenuation FINAL REPORT - An Taisce
The Use of Wetlands for Flood Attenuation FINAL REPORT - An Taisce
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wetlands</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Attenuation</strong> Aquatic Services Unit, UCC<br />
On the Weinfluss (River) near Vienna a test section <strong>of</strong> “wooded” “floodplain” was<br />
constructed. It was an outdoor flume with channel and floodplain into which artificial<br />
floods were released from an upstream reservoir. Experiments using tracer solutions<br />
showed that the flood wave becomes attenuated as it flows across the floodplain and<br />
moves downstream. <strong>The</strong> experiments also showed that wooded floodplain can have<br />
the effect <strong>of</strong> increasing flood water levels upstream <strong>of</strong> the reach (FLOBAR2, 2003).<br />
In a simulation modelling study conducted on Australian rivers, the additional resistence<br />
to flow provided by natural riparian vegetation was found to reduce peak discharge, so<br />
reducing the incidence <strong>of</strong> downstream flooding. Importantly, this effect is more marked<br />
during smaller floods, which are more sensitive to vegetation conditions than larger<br />
floods (<strong>An</strong>derson et al., 2005, 2006). Similarly, Thomas and Nisbet (2007) conducted<br />
hydrological simulation studies on the ability <strong>of</strong> a floodplain woodland to attenuate<br />
flooding. <strong>The</strong>y found that water velocities decreased within the woodland during floods,<br />
so leading to higher water levels and the creation <strong>of</strong> a backwater effect extending<br />
considerable distances upstream. <strong>Flood</strong> storage was increased and peak discharge<br />
downstream reduced. <strong>The</strong>y concluded that strategically placed floodplain woodland<br />
could potentially alleviate downstream flooding.<br />
3.2 Peatlands<br />
<strong>The</strong> hydrology <strong>of</strong> peatlands is very different to alluvial floodplains and they generally<br />
receive much <strong>of</strong> their water either as rainwater (particularly bogs) or groundwater and<br />
hillslope (fens) (Fig. 2). Very little water flows onto peatlands from channel-fed overland<br />
flow because <strong>of</strong> the small size <strong>of</strong> channels owing to their headwater nature. Critical to<br />
understanding the flood attenuation ability <strong>of</strong> peatlands is knowledge <strong>of</strong> how surface<br />
water in the wetland, derived from rainwater, hillslope or groundwater interacts with<br />
the peat soil and surface vegetation (Gibson, 2000).<br />
Within peatlands, water flow can include vertical and horizontal movement within the<br />
various layers and sheet flow and channel flow over the surface as well as water<br />
exchanges with upland systems (Kværner and Kløve, 2008). Whilst water retention by<br />
peatland surfaces may attenuate and delay run<strong>of</strong>f events, the flood mitigation role <strong>of</strong><br />
peatsoil wetlands is <strong>of</strong>ten overstated (Keddy, 2000; Bullock and Acreman, 2003) and it<br />
has been recognised <strong>for</strong> many years that not all peatlands reduce storm flows nor<br />
provide higher flows in summer (Kay, 1960). In contrast to the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />
hydrological properties <strong>of</strong> floodplains, the role <strong>of</strong> headwater peatlands in run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
generation and flood attenuation is still contentious (Kværner and Kløve, 2008).<br />
3.2.1 Raised and blanket bogs<br />
Raised- and blanket bog peatlands consist <strong>of</strong> two layers with distinctly different<br />
hydrological properties - the upper aerated ‘acrotelm’ and lower, anoxic ‘catotelm’<br />
(Holden and Burt, 2003). <strong>The</strong> catotelm is darker and more humified than acrotelm and<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> more well-decomposed and denser peat. <strong>The</strong> catotelm is also constantly<br />
saturated, whereas the water level in the acrotelm can fluctuate more. Water flow<br />
through peat is related to the pore size between particles <strong>of</strong> peat. In poorly<br />
decomposed peat, consisting <strong>of</strong> larger particles <strong>of</strong> woody vegetation or stems and leaves<br />
<strong>FINAL</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong>, February, 2012 24