09.09.2013 Views

The Use of Wetlands for Flood Attenuation FINAL REPORT - An Taisce

The Use of Wetlands for Flood Attenuation FINAL REPORT - An Taisce

The Use of Wetlands for Flood Attenuation FINAL REPORT - An Taisce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wetlands</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Attenuation</strong> Aquatic Services Unit, UCC<br />

BEFORE AFTER<br />

Fig. 8: <strong>Flood</strong>plain storage and restoration <strong>of</strong> meanders on the Inde River, upstream <strong>of</strong>,<br />

Eschweiler, Germany (images from the JAF website 24 )<br />

6.4.5 Coastal Realignment: Hesketh Out Marshes, UK.<br />

<strong>The</strong> site is located on the south bank <strong>of</strong> the Ribble Estuary, Lancashire. <strong>The</strong> marshes had<br />

been reclaimed <strong>for</strong> 30 years by the time managed coastal realignment began. <strong>The</strong> dual<br />

driving <strong>for</strong>ces behind the project, undertaken by the UK Environment Agency (EA), were<br />

to (1) increase flood storage potential and defence standard, and (2) restore salt marsh<br />

habitat <strong>for</strong> wildlife. Breaching was completed <strong>for</strong> the first part <strong>of</strong> the project in 2009.<br />

15km <strong>of</strong> creeks were excavated (widths ranging from 17 to 2m), essentially reinstating<br />

historic creek system (most <strong>of</strong> which had been destroyed due to arable works); 11 saline<br />

lagoons were created and field boundary ditches were infilled.<br />

Partnership between agencies (including the Environment Agency, Natural England and<br />

RSPB) made the scheme possible. Funding sources included the EA’s flood risk<br />

management budget, and a contribution by Lancaster City Council – the latter to<br />

compensate <strong>for</strong> damage to another SPA in the region caused by defence works. Land<br />

purchase costs were higher than originally expected which was a problem on the<br />

scheme. Also, whilst the public were generally supportive <strong>of</strong> the project, concerns were<br />

raised about land drainage which the EA responded to by undertaking additional work to<br />

the land drainage system (a series <strong>of</strong> constructed upstream pools) (ABPmer web<br />

database 25 ). Tides first inundated the entire site in March/April 2009 and, beneficially,<br />

the observed tidal inundation exceeded modelling predictions. It covers a total <strong>of</strong> 180ha<br />

comprised <strong>of</strong> 40ha mudflat, c.110ha saltmarsh, 7ha saline lagoons and 23ha transitional<br />

and floodbank habitat. Figure 9 illustrates the scheme.<br />

24 http://www.jaf.nu/nieuw/eng/home/index.html<br />

25 http://www.abpmer.net/omreg/easycontrols/database/details1.asp?ID=93&lstType=Managed%20breach<br />

<strong>FINAL</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong>, February, 2012 50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!