19.09.2013 Views

Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies

Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies

Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jalapa Railroad Case<br />

• “In the circumstances circumstances, the issue for determ<strong>in</strong>ation is<br />

whether the breach of contract alleged to have resulted<br />

from the nullification of clause twelfth of the contract was an<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary one <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g no <strong>in</strong>ternational responsibility or<br />

whether said breach was effected arbitrarily by means of a<br />

governmental power illegal under <strong>in</strong>ternational law [...] the<br />

1931 decree of the same Legislature Legislature, [ [...] ] was clearly not<br />

an ord<strong>in</strong>ary breach of contract. Here the Government of<br />

Veracruz stepped out of the role of contract<strong>in</strong>g party and<br />

sought to escape vital obligations under its contract by<br />

exercis<strong>in</strong>g its superior governmental power. Such action<br />

under <strong>in</strong>ternational law has been held to be a confiscatory<br />

breach of contract [ [...]. ] ”<br />

• Jalapa Railroad and Power Co., American-Mexican Claims Commission, 1948.<br />

<strong>LL</strong>.M.<br />

IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STUDIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!