Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies
Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies
Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Impregilo Case<br />
• “[i] “[i]n order d th that t th the alleged ll d bbreach h of f contract t t<br />
may constitute a violation of the BIT, it must be<br />
the result of behaviour go<strong>in</strong>g beyond that which<br />
an ord<strong>in</strong>ary contract<strong>in</strong>g party could adopt. Only<br />
the State <strong>in</strong> the exercise of its sovereign<br />
authority (“puissance publique”), and not as a<br />
contract<strong>in</strong>g gpparty, y, may ybreach the obligations g<br />
assumed under the BIT.”<br />
• Impregilo S.p.A. v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/3,<br />
Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 April 200 2005, para. 260 260.<br />
<strong>LL</strong>.M.<br />
IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STUDIES
Change language