Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies
Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies
Indirect Expropriation - LL.M. in International Legal Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
No enrichment of the State required<br />
• “[ “[…] ] the h fact f that h the h expropriation i i was not<br />
directly y for the benefit of the State but for<br />
the benefit of Telecom Invest does not<br />
affect this conclusion, s<strong>in</strong>ce, as the parties<br />
agree, expropriation can exist despite<br />
there be<strong>in</strong>g no obvious benefit to the State<br />
concerned.”<br />
• Rumeli Telekom A.S. v. Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No.<br />
ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008, para. 707.<br />
<strong>LL</strong>.M.<br />
IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STUDIES
Change language