20.09.2013 Views

Update of the Legislators' Guide To Video Lottery Terminal Gambling

Update of the Legislators' Guide To Video Lottery Terminal Gambling

Update of the Legislators' Guide To Video Lottery Terminal Gambling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Estimating <strong>Video</strong> <strong>Lottery</strong> <strong>Terminal</strong> Revenues in Maryland 14<br />

Exhibit 3.2 details <strong>the</strong> estimated revenues that would be generated at each facility for<br />

fiscal 2011 through 2013.<br />

Exhibit 3.2<br />

Estimated VLT Revenues Generated by Location<br />

Fiscal 2011-2013<br />

($ in Millions)<br />

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013<br />

Anne Arundel $125.2 $477.9 $546.1<br />

Baltimore City 0.0 265.0 426.7<br />

Cecil 0.0 117.8 189.6<br />

Worcester 31.4 119.8 136.9<br />

Allegany (Rocky Gap) 0.0 38.7 62.3<br />

<strong>To</strong>tal $156.5 $1,019.1 $1,361.6<br />

Source: Department <strong>of</strong> Legislative Services<br />

WPD Comparisons: DLS and Industry Estimates<br />

As a point <strong>of</strong> reference, <strong>the</strong> Innovation Group, a research consulting firm specializing in<br />

gaming issues, was independently commissioned by VLT proponents to examine potential VLT<br />

facilities and revenues in Maryland. The Innovation Group issued a report in <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong> 2007<br />

that estimated <strong>the</strong> potential gross revenues at five specific site locations that had been identified<br />

in past legislation, assuming a total <strong>of</strong> 12,500 VLTs in permanent operation. Assumptions<br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> specific locations and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> VLTs were as follows: Laurel Park (5,000);<br />

Rocky Gap Resort (1,500); Ocean Downs (2,000); Pimlico (2,000); and Rosecr<strong>of</strong>t Raceway<br />

(2,000). The Innovation Group report estimated that overall revenues at those locations could<br />

have totaled over $1.53 billion in calendar 2011 with an overall average WPD <strong>of</strong> $337, and<br />

$1.65 billion in revenues in calendar 2012 with an average WPD <strong>of</strong> $370; <strong>the</strong>se estimates are<br />

well above DLS’ $250 average WPD estimate.<br />

Exhibit 3.3 presents <strong>the</strong> market segments that <strong>the</strong> Innovation Group projected would<br />

participate in <strong>the</strong> Maryland market. The research consulting group’s analysis suggests that <strong>the</strong><br />

installation <strong>of</strong> VLTs in Maryland by 2013 would result in a recapture <strong>of</strong> 61 percent<br />

($502 million) <strong>of</strong> revenues that would o<strong>the</strong>rwise flow out <strong>of</strong> State. According to <strong>the</strong> Innovation<br />

Group, this recapture would comprise approximately 30 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> projected gross Maryland<br />

VLT revenues. A more extensive discussion <strong>of</strong> this issue may be found in Chapter 6 <strong>of</strong> this<br />

report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!