27.09.2013 Views

ERGONOMÍA OCUPACIONAL - SOCIEDAD DE ERGONOMISTAS ...

ERGONOMÍA OCUPACIONAL - SOCIEDAD DE ERGONOMISTAS ...

ERGONOMÍA OCUPACIONAL - SOCIEDAD DE ERGONOMISTAS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ERGONOMÍA</strong> <strong>OCUPACIONAL</strong><br />

INVESTIGACIONES Y APLICACIONES<br />

VOL. 3


<strong>SOCIEDAD</strong> <strong>DE</strong> <strong>ERGONOMISTAS</strong> <strong>DE</strong> MÉXICO A.C. (SEMAC)<br />

2010


<strong>ERGONOMÍA</strong> <strong>OCUPACIONAL</strong><br />

INVESTIGACIONES Y APLICACIONES<br />

VOL. 3<br />

EDITADO POR:<br />

CARLOS ESPEJO GUASCO<br />

Presidente Fundador SEMAC<br />

ENRIQUE <strong>DE</strong> LA VEGA BUSTILLOS<br />

Presidente SEMAC 2002-2004<br />

VICTORIO MARTINEZ CASTRO<br />

Presidente SEMAC 2008-2010


2010 Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México A.C. (SEMAC)<br />

ISBN 978-0-578-05757-6


Prefacio<br />

La Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México A.C. (SEMAC), como parte relevante de su<br />

actividad e interés en la difusión, promoción y apoyo a la ergonomía, ha organizado<br />

desde 1999 y de forma anual, su Congreso Internacional de Ergonomía. En Mayo de<br />

2010, el XII Congreso Internacional de Ergonomía tiene lugar en CD. Juárez, Chih., con<br />

la participación de ergonomistas profesionales e interesados en esta área.<br />

Aunque este último año ha sido, económicamente, muy difícil, eso no ha disminuido la<br />

calidad de los trabajos que se presentan este año. Se reúnen en este libro una selección<br />

de los trabajos, presentados en este congreso, más representativos de las diversas<br />

áreas que participan en la ergonomía, aportando diferentes investigaciones y soluciones<br />

a problemas específicos, con la finalidad de contribuir a la difusión, apoyo en la<br />

educación e investigación, de temas de interés para la ergonomía.<br />

Los editores, árbitros y comité académico, a nombre de la Sociedad de Ergonomistas de<br />

México, A.C., agradecemos a los autores de los trabajos aquí presentados su esfuerzo,<br />

e interés por participar y compartir su trabajo y conocimientos en el XII Congreso<br />

Internacional de Ergonomía de SEMAC. También agradecemos a los participantes y<br />

asistentes, provenientes de muy diversos lugares y formaciones, así como a todo el<br />

equipo de organización de este congreso, su valiosa aportación que estamos seguros<br />

derivará en el avance de la ergonomía en las Instituciones de Educación Superior y en<br />

la planta productiva nacional y mundial.<br />

Enrique de la Vega Bustillos<br />

Presidente SEMAC 2002 – 2004<br />

<strong>SOCIEDAD</strong> <strong>DE</strong> <strong>ERGONOMISTAS</strong> <strong>DE</strong> MÉXICO A.C.<br />

“Trabajo para optimizar el trabajo”<br />

Cd. Juárez, Chih. Mayo de 2010


ANTHROPOMETRY<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y aplicaciones:. Vol 3<br />

CONTENT<br />

ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA OF STU<strong>DE</strong>NTS OF THE UNIVERSITY<br />

OF SONORA, SONORA, MEXICO<br />

Martina Elisa Platt Borbón, Amina Marín Martínez, María Magdalena<br />

Ayala, Rafael Castillo Ortega and Félix Montaño Valle<br />

ANTHROPOMETRY AND FACILITIES <strong>DE</strong>SIGN VERIFICATION<br />

OF NEW <strong>DE</strong>VELOPED PRESCHOOL LEVEL BUILDINGS IN THE<br />

EDUCATIONAL SECTOR OF HERMOSILLO, SONORA.<br />

Hiram Jesús Higuera Valenzuela, Manuel Sandoval Delgado<br />

<strong>DE</strong>SIGN ANTHROPOMETRIC REFERENCED LETTERS TO THE<br />

LABOR POPULATION OF CABORCA CITY IN SONORA<br />

MEXICO.<br />

Joaquín Vásquez Quiroga, Jesús<br />

1<br />

Rodolfo Guzmán Hernández,<br />

Enrique Javier de la Vega Bustillos.<br />

BIOMECHANICAL<br />

BIOMECHANICAL MO<strong>DE</strong>L TO ESTIMATE RECOVERY TIME ON<br />

HIGHLY REPETITIVE WORK IN MAQUILA OPERATIONS<br />

Fco. Octavio López Millán, Enrique Javier de la Vega Bustillos,<br />

Manuel Arnoldo Rodríguez Medina, Armando Ayala Corona<br />

VERIFICATION OF MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE WEIGHT OF LIFT,<br />

TABULATED IN LIBERTY MUTUAL TABLES, IN WOMEN OF<br />

CABORCA<br />

Jesús Rodolfo Guzmán Hernández, Joaquín Vásquez Quiroga,<br />

Enrique Javier De La Vega Bustillos<br />

FORCE ANALYSIS IN HANDS ON HIGHLY REPETITIVE WORK<br />

IN MAQUILA OPERATIONS<br />

Fco. Octavio López Millán, Enrique Javier de la Vega Bustillos,<br />

MaríaJesúsTéllez Moroyoqui, LodevarPavlovichOviedo,<br />

Bertha Leticia Ortiz Navar<br />

<strong>DE</strong>SIGN AND WORK ANALYSIS<br />

ADVANTAGES OF THE ORTHOGONAL ARRANGEMENTS OF<br />

THE METHOD TAGUCHI IN THE <strong>DE</strong>SIGN OF EXPERIMENTS IN<br />

ERGONOMIC<br />

Alois Fabiani-Bello, Humberto García-Castellanos, Rosa Maria<br />

Reyes Martinez<br />

Page<br />

1<br />

14<br />

20<br />

35<br />

46<br />

55<br />

76


ERGONOMICS AND EDUCATION<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y aplicaciones:. Vol 3<br />

ACA<strong>DE</strong>MIC ASSAYS FOR ERGONOMICS.<br />

Zoe Madai Cruz Purata, María del Sagrario Medina Rodríguez, Julio<br />

Gerardo Lorenzo Palomera<br />

OCCUPATIONAL ERGONICS<br />

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE VARIABLES OF<br />

TEMPERATURE, STRENGTH AND CYCLES PER MINUTE TO<br />

PERFORM HORIZONTAL REPETITIVE MOVEMENTS OF THE<br />

WRIST<br />

Camargo Wilson Claudia, Rivera Valerio Abril A.,<br />

Rubio Martinez Jesus R., de la Vega Bustillos Enrique J.,<br />

López Bonilla Oscar R., Olguín Tiznado Jesús E.,<br />

Báez López Yolanda A.<br />

TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS ON WRIST SURFACE DUE<br />

REPETITIVE MOVEMENT TASKS USING SENSORIAL<br />

THERMOGRAPHY TO FIND OUT A POSSIBLE PATHOLOGY<br />

FOR A CTD<br />

Ordorica Villalvazo Javier, Camargo Wilson Claudia, De la Vega<br />

Bustillos Enrique, Olguín Tiznado Jesús E., López Bonilla Oscar R.,<br />

Limón Romero Jorge<br />

VIBRATION STUDY TO IMPROVE STRIPPING OPERATION<br />

IN A LITOGRAPHICS COMPANY<br />

Mario Ramírez Barrera, Jorge Valenzuela Corral, Athenea Núñez<br />

Sifuentes<br />

A <strong>DE</strong>SCRIPTIVE STUDY ABOUT THE INTEGRATION OF<br />

ERGONOMIC ATTRIBUTES ON THE SELECTION OF<br />

ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY -AMT-<br />

Aidé Maldonado Macías, Arturo Reallyvázquez, Guadalupe Ramírez,<br />

Jorge Garcia-Alcaraz, Salvador Noriega<br />

WORK EVALUATION<br />

REMOTE ERGONOMICS EVALUATIONS IN THE OFFICE<br />

Jeffrey E. Fernandez, Gabriel Ibarra-Mejia , and Brandy F. Ware<br />

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AN ERGONOMIC<br />

EVALUATION AND THE USERS' SATISFACTION OF NEW<br />

EDUCATIONAL CENTERS<br />

Martín Daniel Del Sol Rangel, Manuel Sandoval Delgado<br />

<strong>DE</strong>SIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MANUFACTURING CELL<br />

WITH ERGONOMIC SUPPORT ANALYSIS<br />

Rigoberto Zamora Alarcón, Manuel Enrique Alcaráz Ayala,<br />

Julio César Romero González<br />

86<br />

98<br />

114<br />

128<br />

137<br />

151<br />

156<br />

163


ROSA MARIA REYES<br />

MARTINEZ<br />

Instituto Tecnologico de Cd.<br />

Juarez<br />

AI<strong>DE</strong> ARACELY MALDONADO<br />

MACIAS<br />

Universidad Autonoma de Cd.<br />

Juarez<br />

MA. ANTONIA BARRAZA<br />

Createc Cd. Juarez<br />

JEAN PAUL BECKER<br />

Ergon, Guadalajara, Jal.<br />

GABRIEL IBARRA MEJIA<br />

Universidad Autonoma de Cd.<br />

Juarez<br />

MIGUEL BAL<strong>DE</strong>RRAMA<br />

CHACON<br />

Valeo, Cd. Juarez<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y aplicaciones:. Vol 3<br />

COMITÉ ACADÉMICO<br />

MONICA AI<strong>DE</strong> BARRERA<br />

Delphi, Cd. Juarez<br />

ELISA CHACON MARINEZ<br />

Nchmarketing, Cd. Juarez<br />

CARLOS ESPEJO GUASCO<br />

Visteon, Cd. Juarez<br />

FRANCISCO OCTAVIO<br />

LOPEZ MILLAN<br />

Instituto Tecnologico de<br />

Hermosillo<br />

VICTORIO MARTINEZ<br />

CASTRO<br />

MABE


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

"ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA OF STU<strong>DE</strong>NTS OF THE<br />

UNIVERSITY OF SONORA, SONORA, MEXICO"<br />

Martina Elisa Platt Borbón, Amina Marín Martínez, María Magdalena Ayala,<br />

Rafael Castillo Ortega and Félix Montaño Valle<br />

Industrial Engineering Department, Universidad de Sonora, Sonora, México<br />

1 mplatt@industrial.uson.mx, 2 amarin@industrial.uson.mx, 3 magdar@industrial.uson.mx, 4 rcastillo@industrial.<br />

RESUMEN<br />

uson.mx, 5 felixm@industrial.uson.mx<br />

Las cartas antropométricas dan la información acerca de las dimensiones de una población determinada y<br />

son muy utilizadas por los diseñadores. Los expertos en diseño afirman que una ayuda física diseñada<br />

para una población especifica, no es óptima para cualquier otra; ésto parece lógico, pero en nuestro país,<br />

no es posible ratificar o rectificar esta afirmación debido a que desconocemos las Cartas Antropométricas<br />

Mexicanas.<br />

La antropometría es la determinante de las condiciones ergonómicas; por tanto, los estudios<br />

antropométricos deben referirse a una población específica y de ahí nuestro interés por conocer las<br />

medidas de los estudiantes de la Universidad de Sonora.<br />

Se incluye un ejemplo de las tablas antropométricas por edad y por sexo de un estudio realizado a 227<br />

estudiantes de la Universidad de Sonora, Unidad regional Centro y se describe la metodología utilizada.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Anthropometric data gives information about the dimensions of a certain population and it is used by<br />

designers. Design experts affirm that physical equipment and facilities designed for a specific population,<br />

are not good for any other one; this seems logical, but, in our country, it is not possible to ratify or to rectify<br />

this statement because many of us ignore the Mexican Anthropometric data.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 1


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

In order to design ergonomic living and working conditions, anthropometric principles must be applied;<br />

therefore anthropometric studies should refer to a specific population and it is our interest to know the<br />

dimensions and some physical features of the students of the University of Sonora.<br />

This research contains data collected in a sample of 227 students of the University of Sonora, Sonora,<br />

Mexico, from January to December, 2009; their body dimensions by age and sex, are depicted in figures 1<br />

and 2, and the methodology used is also described.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Nowadays, men have reached an unusual development. Tools, equipment, machines and all kind of<br />

technology that are available aim for comfort and well-being in our daily life, as well as effectiveness,<br />

adaptability, prevention and for safety at work. These advances always arrive of the hand with new models<br />

of equipment, machines, tools or vehicles, which more dissimilar, force men to adapt themselves inside of<br />

or outside of them, implying possible risks, mainly at work places (McCormick, 1982).<br />

In all men’s activities, some or a lot of physical effort is needed, and they need and will continue needing<br />

physical assistance to reduce fatigue, to improve manufactured items or to produce them more quickly;<br />

some examples are: pincers or a hammer in a shop, a typewriter in an office, a pan in the kitchen or a<br />

stairway and its handrails in a building, etc.<br />

New scientific approaches and technological advances are key elements in designing to achieve higher<br />

productivity with almost perfect equipment and machinery. These items should eliminate the sources of<br />

risks and injuries. Designs should also take into account men’s physical characteristics, limitations and<br />

capabilities who will use them; designs must adapt physical tools to users and should avoid unnecessary<br />

efforts, tasks must be performed quickly, easily and safely, since individuals are more productive being<br />

comfortable at work.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 2


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Adapting tools to users or workers should not only be bounded to the operator, but to all persons that will<br />

work with them, such it is the case of the maintenance personnel. Any internal part of equipment or<br />

machine should be accessible and be able to provide the necessary space to make any repair (Flores,<br />

2001).<br />

Mexican workers also have to adapt themselves to working tools and conditions, mainly for three<br />

circumstances: there is a great quantity of equipment and machinery that were bought in foreign countries,<br />

which were not designed to be operated by the Mexican population; Mexican manufacturers produce their<br />

items erroneously, they design them as they were designed in other countries and the most dramatic<br />

situation is that they don't know the physical characteristics (anthropometric data) of the Mexican<br />

population, or perhaps they have not been published.<br />

The Mexican anthropometric data found in the literature, up to now, have little information and they were<br />

collected from certain regions.<br />

a. The Yucatan population's anthropometric data is a research carried out by George Dee Williams in<br />

1927 and published in 1931 by the Bureau of International Research of Harvard University and<br />

Radcliffe College under the name of "Mayan-Spanish Crosses in Yucatan".<br />

b. Anthropometric measurements of some selected world populations, were presented as a report by<br />

Robert M. White during the International Symposium of Engineering of Human Factors in 1972. This<br />

report presents the dimensions of the military Air Forces of eighteen (18) Latin American countries<br />

on the whole, but the reference of the source of information is not shown.<br />

c. Datos antropométricos de la población de Ciudad Juárez, is a study carried out in 1986 and 1987<br />

by the Center of Graduates of the Technological Institute of Ciudad Juárez. This investigation<br />

presents 50 anthropometric data of 987 adults, mainly from the maquiladora industry.<br />

d. “Estudio de ergonomía estática en una empresa textil Mexicana” was published in the journal<br />

Condiciones de Trabajo, in 1979.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 3


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

e. Anthropometry of female maquila workers, is a research published in the International Journal of<br />

Industrial Ergonomics in 1999 by Victor Liu, David Sanchez Monroy and Guillermo Parga. It<br />

presents twelve body dimensions of women workers in the maquiladora industry.<br />

f. Cartas antropométricas para la población laboral de la maquila de Ciudad Obregón, is a research<br />

conducted by Claudia Elena Mungarro Ibarra, in 2009.<br />

g. Cartas antropométricas de adultos con enanismo de 18 a 45 años de edad para el diseño de<br />

mobiliario, this survey was carried out in Mexico City, by Rubén Baptista Balderas, an Industrial<br />

Design graduate student at Centro Universitario UAEMéx Zumpango, who took body dimensions of<br />

adults with dwarfism among 18 to 45 years old to design different furniture.<br />

h. Cartas antropométricas de la población laboral del estado de Sonora, área serrana, this study<br />

gathered body dimensions of workers in the northeastern region of the state of Sonora, Mexico and<br />

it was performed by students of the Universidad de la Sierra in the state of Sonora in 2008.<br />

i. Cartas antropométricas de la población laboral de la República Mexicana, a research published by<br />

the Instituto Tecnológico of Hermosillo.<br />

Some employers may perceive that since tasks are designed or redesigned, whatever the operator will<br />

need may be, carefully, taken into account, but it may increase their investment, but in the long run,<br />

investment will be recovered and the gains will be financially enlarged.<br />

On the other hand, if an employee works comfortably when he/she is sitting down, he/she will not feel tired,<br />

will not feel any pain, and will be able to work easily and relaxed, and his/hers items quality will increase,<br />

as well as effectiveness and efficiency. In such scenario, health care costs will decrease and the<br />

employee’s moral will improve.<br />

Ergonomics principles can avoid injuries or painful illnesses that can handicap workers and make work<br />

places more comfortably safe in productive environments (McCormick, 1982).<br />

Anthropometric data`s main utilization is objects designed for human use, such as tools, furniture, work<br />

stations, facilities, etc. which optimize working and living conditions.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 4


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

As it can be seen, designing for human use is a wide objective, and to achieve good results it is necessary<br />

to keep in mind that who is or will be a product’s customer. That is the main reason that anthropometric<br />

data is necessary as another tool for work designers, and its gathering takes time and it is quite expensive.<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To gather anthropometric data of students of the University of Sonora, in Hermosillo, Sonora, México, for<br />

different population strata, for:<br />

a) Age range (3), and<br />

b) Sex (2)<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

A group of four trained people got the anthropometric data of 227 students. Three of the investigators (M.<br />

E. P. B. and A. M. M.) trained this group; they covered techniques, devices to use; and the required<br />

theoretical and practical knowledge to carry out the necessary activities.<br />

The trained group carried out the project with students of the University of Sonora in Hermosillo, Sonora,<br />

México. Students were asked to wear light clothing and to take off their shoes during the study.<br />

An anthropometer, a graduated scale in kilograms, and a survey of anthropometric data to register<br />

measurements were used.<br />

Measurements were taken by the students’ right side posture, when they were standing straight up, and<br />

also sitting down, in an erect position.<br />

1. Standing straight up. The individual remains standing straight, seeing toward the front, with the<br />

ankles together, the weight distributed equally in both feet and with his arms hanging naturally to his<br />

sides.<br />

2. Sitting down straight. The individual remains sitting down and straight, with his/her view toward the<br />

front, the arms relaxed and hanging, forearms and hands extended forward, thighs were horizontal,<br />

and his/her feet resting in an adjusted surface so that the knees were in an angle of 90 degrees.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 5


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Data were gathered and processed in Excel software, and percentiles were later determined.<br />

Data were grouped by sex, age and geographical regions, in the following way:<br />

a. for sex: women and men,<br />

b. for age, from 17 to 20, from 21 to 23 and from 24 years old and up.<br />

c. Birthplace, the Mexican Republic was divided by several areas:<br />

North zone, for the States of Chihuahua, Coahuila, Durango, New León and Zacatecas.<br />

Centered area that includes the States of Aguascalientes, Mexico, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Morelos, Puebla,<br />

Querétaro, San Luis Potosí', besides Mexico Federal District.<br />

Northern Pacific area: The states of the Northwestern area such as Sonora, Baja California, Sinaloa and<br />

Nayarit.<br />

Center Pacific area, for the states of Jalisco, Michoacán and Colima.<br />

South Pacific area: for the states of Guerrero, Oaxaca and Chiapas.<br />

Gulf of Mexico area, includes the states of Tamaulipas and Veracruz.<br />

The different areas were settled down, arbitrarily, following the approach of their geographical proximity.<br />

In figures 1 and 2, are shown the codes used, their description and the individual's position. This code was<br />

taken from a study carried out by the NASA.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 6


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

UNIVERSIDAD <strong>DE</strong> SONORA. Carta Antropométrica<br />

Edad: 15-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 Sexo: F M<br />

Lugar de Nacimiento (Estado): _______________________________________ Ocupación: ____________________________________<br />

Lugar de Nacimiento (Estado): Padre: _____________________________ Madre: ______________________________________<br />

Analista: _________________________________________________________ (Usar ropa ligera y ajustada al cuerpo)<br />

920 Peso (Kg) 122 Ancho de hombros<br />

805 Estatura 223 Ancho de pecho<br />

328 Altura al ojo 457 Ancho de cadera (parado)<br />

23 Altura al hombro 32 Largo de brazo<br />

309 Altura al codo 67 Profundidad del pecho<br />

949 Altura a la cintura (ombligo) 430 Circunferencia de la cabeza<br />

398 Altura al glúteo 639 Circunferencia del cuello<br />

973 Altura a la muñeca 230 Circunferencia del pecho<br />

66 Altura a los nudillos 931 Circunferencia de la cintura<br />

265 Altura al dedo medio 68 Circunferencia del brazo<br />

797 Ancho de brazos extendidos<br />

lateralmente<br />

798 Ancho de codos con las manos<br />

al centro del pecho<br />

178 Circunferencia de la cadera<br />

69 Circunferencia de la pantorrilla<br />

80 Distancia de la pared al dedo medio 144 Distancia de oído a oído sobre la<br />

cabeza<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 7


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

752 Distancia de la pared al nudillo 165 Ancho de la cara a la altura de las<br />

patillas<br />

Figure 1. Codes used, their description, and the individual's position.<br />

427 Ancho de la cabeza 912 Altura del asiento a los nudillos con los<br />

brazos extendidos hacia arriba<br />

595 Altura de la barbilla a la parte superior<br />

de la cabeza<br />

200 Longitud desde el respaldo del asiento a<br />

la parte posterior de la rodilla<br />

441 Longitud de la cabeza 194 Longitud desde el respaldo del asiento al<br />

frente de la rodilla<br />

420 Longitud de la mano 2fgm Altura desde el suelo a la cabeza<br />

(sentado)<br />

656 Longitud de la palma de la mano 4fgm Altura desde el suelo al asiento<br />

411 Ancho de la palma de la mano 529 Altura desde el suelo a la rodilla<br />

(sentado)<br />

859 Ancho de muslos con las rodillas juntas<br />

(sentado)<br />

678 Altura desde el suelo a la parte posterior<br />

de la rodilla (sentado)<br />

758 Altura del asiento a la cabeza 70 Longitud desde el codo al dedo medio<br />

330 Altura del asiento al ojo 507 Ancho de la espalda con los brazos<br />

extendidos hacia el frente<br />

25 Altura del asiento al hombro 459 Ancho de la cadera (sentado)<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 8<br />

Elaboró: GF y SM


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

312 Altura del asiento al codo a 90° 775 Longitud del pie<br />

856 Altura al muslo 776 Alto del pie<br />

914 Altura del asiento al dedo medio con<br />

brazos extendidos hacia arriba<br />

777 Ancho del pie<br />

Figure 2. Codes used, their description, and the individual's position.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 9<br />

Elaboró: GF y SM


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

RESULTS<br />

Six anthropometric data were obtained from a sample of 227 students, for women and men, for three group<br />

of ages from 17 to 20, from 21 to 23 and from 24 to 54 years old.<br />

Hereby are presented two anthropometric surveys where body dimensions are described, measurements are<br />

in centimeters and weight is shown in kilograms for 5 th , 50 th and 95 th percentiles of a women’s sample<br />

(figure 3) and for a masculine sample (figure 4), both, from 17 to 20 years old. In figure 5 data shows a<br />

sample size of 227 masculine and feminine students by age range and sex.<br />

Measurement’s Desription 5% 50% 95% Measurement’s Description 5% 50% 95%<br />

Weight 37.17 66.6 96.02 Length of head 17.042 19.241 21.441<br />

Stature 151.77 165.54 179.3 Length of hand 15.828 17.594 19.36<br />

Length of palm of hand 7.831 9.8366 11.842<br />

Height standing Width of palm of hand 4.5519 7.8598 11.168<br />

Eye 139.97 153.73 167.5 Diameter of grabs (interior) 36.064 45.146 54.228<br />

Shoulder 123.24 136.02 148.8<br />

Elbow 86.196 107.4 128.6 Heights sitting<br />

Waist 91.871 101.94 112 Height to head from seat 71.443 85.524 99.605<br />

Buttock 65.34 74.432 83.52 Height to eye from seat<br />

Height to shoulder from<br />

67.182 75.012 82.842<br />

Wrist 53.194 82.124 111.1 seat<br />

Height to elbow from seat,<br />

50.45 59.456 68.462<br />

Middle finger 54.842 63.695 72.55 90 degrees 20.364 24.951 29.538<br />

Width of extended arms 151.27 166.63 182 Height to thigh from seat 10.891 14.046 17.202<br />

Width of elbows to the<br />

Height to Middle finger<br />

center of chest 70.412 85.588 100.8 from seat, arms up 117.5 129.26 141.01<br />

Length of arm extended<br />

Height to center of fist, arms<br />

from the wall 64.072 81.687 99.3 up 100.41 122.3 144.2<br />

Length to the center of the<br />

Height to head from floor<br />

fist from the wall 51.492 73.712 95.93 sitting<br />

Hight to seat from floor<br />

121.12 131.11 141.1<br />

Width of shoulders standing 34.828 42.038 49.25 sitting 23.215 49.154 75.092<br />

Width of chest standing 24.719 30.34 35.96 Popliteal to buttocks<br />

Length from knees to<br />

39.537 47.641 55.746<br />

Width of hips standing<br />

Circumferencia of neck<br />

26.245 33.701 41.16 buttocks 48.308 59.027 69.745<br />

standing<br />

Circumferencia fo chest<br />

23.618 35.539 47.46 Height from floor to popliteal 35.818 43.388 50.958<br />

standing 73.352 90.66 108 Height from floor to knee 40.054 52.266 64.477<br />

Circumferencia of waist<br />

Length from elbow to<br />

standing 55.12 79.619 104.1 middle finger<br />

Width of back with arms<br />

40.634 44.907 49.18<br />

Circumference of hips<br />

extended forward –forward<br />

standing 81.893 99.361 116.8 reach 34.85 40.587 46.323<br />

Circumference of head 46.695 54.395 62.1 Width of hips, sitting 32.447 38.468 44.489<br />

Distance from ear to ear<br />

Width of thighs with knees<br />

over head<br />

Width of face to the height<br />

26.672 34.971 43.27 meeting 30.701 37.212 43.723<br />

of sideburns 11.977 13.563 15.15 Length of foot 21.381 24.137 26.892<br />

Width of head<br />

Height of chin to superior<br />

13.645 14.973 16.3 Width of foot 6.4972 8.4366 10.376<br />

part of head 18.517 22.146 25.78 Height of instep 4.3354 6.2829 8.2305<br />

Figure 3. Body dimensions for a femenine sample from 17 to 20 years old.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 10


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Measurement’s description 5% 50% 95% Measurement’s description 5% 50% 95%<br />

Weight 42.488 71.49375 100.49 Length of head 16.075 19.574 23.073<br />

Stature 159.93 171.5791 183.23 Length of hand 15.673 18.054 20.435<br />

Length of palm of hand 8.6763 10.373 12.07<br />

Height standing Width of palm of hand 6.6558 8.1094 9.5629<br />

Eye 146.22 158.5875 170.955 Diameter of grabs (interior) 41.309 47.465 53.621<br />

Shoulder 130.06 141.2395 152.41<br />

Elbow 92.509 109.3958 126.28 Heights sitting<br />

Waist 95.292 105.0958 114.9 Height to head from seat 68.123 86.91 105.7<br />

Buttock 54.349 79.39791 104.44 Height to eye from seat 67.85 77.194 86.538<br />

Wrist 59.077 85.08333 111.08 Height to shoulder from seat<br />

Height to elbow from seat,<br />

51.535 61.767 71.998<br />

Middle finger 57.349 65.675 74.000 90 degrees 20.315 25.654 30.993<br />

Width of extended arms 160.06 173.7833 187.50 Height to thigh from seat 11.199 14.198 17.196<br />

Width of elbows to the center<br />

Height to Middle finger from<br />

of chest 80.408 88.92812 97.448 seat, arms up 123.05 135.74 148.43<br />

Length of arm extended<br />

Height to center of fist, arms<br />

from the wall 74.883 84.65416 94.425 up 113.39 126.16 138.93<br />

Length to the center of the<br />

Height to head from floor<br />

fist from the wall 65.872 74.74166 83.6111 sitting<br />

Hight to seat from floor<br />

122.9 132.74 142.57<br />

Width of shoulders standing 35.141 44.8 54.458 sitting 25.36 49.129 72.899<br />

Width of chest standing 26.262 31.33333 36.4043 Popliteal to buttocks<br />

Length from knees to<br />

41.01 48.425 55.84<br />

Width of hips standing<br />

Circumferencia of neck<br />

29.324 35.1 40.876 buttocks 51.866 59.494 67.121<br />

standing<br />

Circumferencia fo chest<br />

18.107 38.59791 59.088 Height from floor to popliteal 37.174 43.798 50.422<br />

standing 75.157 92.11041 109.06 Height from floor to knee 45.236 52.631 60.026<br />

Circumferencia of waist<br />

Length from elbow to middle<br />

standing 62.925 84.41458 105.90 finger<br />

Width of back with arms<br />

40.184 46.278 52.372<br />

Circumference of hips<br />

extended forward –forward<br />

standing 81.922 97.05833 112.19 reach 38.252 43.581 48.911<br />

Circumference of head 46.276 56.28666 66.297 Width of hips, sitting 31.955 38.346 44.737<br />

Distance from ear to ear over<br />

Width of thighs with knees<br />

head<br />

Width of face to the height of<br />

25.215 35.57708 45.939 meeting 29.586 36.777 43.969<br />

sideburns 12.364 14.04375 15.723 Length of foot 22.467 25.502 28.537<br />

Width of head<br />

Height of chin to superior<br />

13.581 15.52604 17.471 Width of foot 6.2461 8.6625 11.079<br />

part of head 19.43 22.74375 26.057 Height of instep 4.812 6.5781 8.3443<br />

Figure 4. Body dimensions of a masculine sample from 17 to 20 years old.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 11


Estratum by age<br />

17-20<br />

21-23<br />

24-54<br />

TOTALS<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Masculine<br />

Feminine<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 12<br />

48<br />

85<br />

3<br />

136<br />

Figure 5. Sample size, grouped by age and sex of students of the Universidad de Sonora.<br />

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS<br />

Ergonomics emerged exclusively to increase worker's productivity, with time, it has become into a<br />

multidiscipline, it looks forward to make tools more functional and spaces habitable, to improve aspects like<br />

the men’s safe, comfort and health.<br />

At present times, muscular – skeletal problems are often found in workers, "in such situations applied<br />

Ergonomics is useful because it improves adaptability of physical persons’ limitations to environmental<br />

conditions and to work tools, avoiding the development of pathologies like tendinitis, cervical and lumbar<br />

injuries, among others."<br />

Products, tools, machines, work places and furniture should be designed thinking of the activity or activities<br />

that people will carry out on them. A work place can have more than one worker and its design should be<br />

adjustable, that is why sometimes, it is necessary to build products of several sizes in such a way that<br />

someone would have the possibility to choose the one that better adapts to the user's necessities, the other<br />

one, would be to create products that are adjustable in a certain range of body dimensions, making necessary<br />

to know the benefits and costs in such a way that decisions that are taken are the correct ones.<br />

41<br />

47<br />

3<br />

91


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

As it can be seen, everything that is manufactured, elaborated to interrelate with man should use their<br />

dimensions, it is necessary to know human anthropometry.<br />

The anthropometric data gathered in this research is one more effort added to those that were made<br />

previously in Mexico. Body dimensions of students of the University of Sonora, in Hermosillo, Sonora,<br />

Mexico includes male and female from 17 to 20, 21 and from 23 to 24 years old and older students; natives<br />

and non natives from Hermosillo. These sample is build of 60.87% men and 39.83% women, 100% belong<br />

to the North Pacific area and 93.52% were born in the state of Sonora.<br />

Suggestions that can be made are: to invite researchers, education institutions and companies to develop<br />

anthropometric data of Mexican populations, aiming to design production systems that will fulfill their main<br />

goals: to increase productivity and to produce high product quality, optimizing workers’ safe and comfort at<br />

the same time, so that they would allow them to compete in today’s global business.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. McCormick, Ernest and Sanders, Mark. (1982). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. United<br />

States of America. McGraw-Hill Book Company.<br />

2. Neufert, Ernest. (1977). The Art of Projecting in Architecture. Barcelona, Spain. Editorial Gustavo<br />

Gil, S. A.<br />

3. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (1982). Lecturas en materia de seguridad social. Ergonomía.<br />

México.<br />

4. Flores, Cecilia. (2001). Ergonomía para el diseño. Designio.<br />

5. Mondelo, Gregori, de Pedro Gómez. (2002). Ergonomía 4. El trabajo en oficinas. Editotial<br />

Alfaomega.<br />

6. Murrell, K. F. H. (1979). Ergonomics. London, England. Chapman & Hall.<br />

7. Konz, Stephan. (2004) Work Design. Columbus, Unites States. Grid Publishing.<br />

8. Unites States of America. NASA. (1987). Anthropometric Source Book, Vol 2: A Handbook of<br />

Anthropometric Dates.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 13


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

ANTHROPOMETRY AND FACILITIES <strong>DE</strong>SIGN VERIFICATION OF NEW<br />

<strong>DE</strong>VELOPED PRESCHOOL LEVEL BUILDINGS IN THE EDUCATIONAL<br />

SECTOR OF HERMOSILLO, SONORA.<br />

Hiram Jesús Higuera Valenzuela 1 , Manuel Sandoval Delgado 1<br />

1 Departamento de Investigación y Posgrado<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Hermosillo<br />

Ave. Tecnológico S/N Colonia Sahuaro<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora 83170<br />

Corresponding author’s e-mail: hiram.higuera@gmail.com, msandoval@ith.mx<br />

Resumen: Esta investigación nace de la problemática de la no existencia de tablas<br />

antropométricas de la población infantil principalmente en la edad de preescolar en México, las<br />

utilizadas por el Instituto Nacional de la Infraestructura Física Nacional no incluyen datos<br />

pertenecientes a infantes en edad de preescolar, las cuales se utilizan para la elaboración de<br />

mobiliario y dimensionamiento en el diseño de las instalaciones educativas (INIFED).<br />

Antropometría infantil.<br />

Abstract: This research comes from the lack of anthropometric charts for Mexican children in preschool<br />

level, the charts used by the Instituto Nacional de la Infraestructura Física Nacional<br />

(National Institute for Educational Facilities) do not include data from pre-school level children;<br />

those charts are used to build furnishing and to determine the right size of the facilities (INIFED).<br />

Children’s Anthropometry<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Current situation in developing countries and economic growth, lack of in-house technologies and<br />

economic and technological dependence favor the use of models designed by other cultures<br />

(Oborne, 2007).<br />

2. OBJETIVES<br />

Check if design is within measurements found in the anthropometry charts in new pre-school level<br />

buildings in Hermosillo, Sonora during 2007 and 2008, since previously built schools show a lot of<br />

mistakes regarding the facilities’ size and the furnishing causing a lot of discontents and troubles<br />

in teachers and family parents in pre-school level buildings.<br />

3. METHODOLOGY<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 14


3.1 Programming stage<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

a) The aim of this anthropometric research must be very clear, specifying if data collected will<br />

be used for a new design, redesign or to create a general purpose database.<br />

b) It is necessary to define the kind of anthropometric technique that will be applied, which can<br />

be “Static Anthropometry” or “Dynamic Anthropometry”. (Flores G., 1997).<br />

Static anthropometry measures the body still. It measures the skeleton between specific<br />

anatomic points. Dynamic or functional anthropometry it’s the one which measures the body in<br />

motion, acknowledging that the actual reach of a person’s arm it’s not equal to the length of the<br />

arm itself, but it takes into consideration the additional reach provided by the movement of the<br />

shoulder and torso when a person is working (Ergocupacional).<br />

c) Once that the kind of anthropometric technique has been chosen, all the measures that will<br />

be used need to be specified and for this we need to keep in mind our final goal. In order to<br />

choose the measures we need to take, we must refer to the general anthropometric set<br />

(static or dynamic), taking into account the name and standard reference points in order to<br />

keep the techniques systematization.<br />

d) Once that the measures to be taken have been defined, the anthropometric chart to be<br />

used needs to be designed. A copy of the chart for each subject needs to be built.<br />

e) Besides the good quality and accuracy of the measuring equipment, portability it’s<br />

important, since most of the time it will be necessary to go where people who will be<br />

measured is. The most basic equipment must include anthropometric chart, portable<br />

anthropometer, flexometer, and tape measure. (Flores G., 1997).<br />

Figure 1. Anthropometric chart and portable anthropometer.<br />

3.2 Sampling<br />

In this stage it’s when individuals in new facilities start to be measured in order to collect<br />

raw data; this is 32 measures by each individual.<br />

3.3 Statistics Analysis<br />

Once that the data is collected, it is analyzed and an anthropometric chart is built;<br />

percentiles 95, 50, 5 come from this chart, those are used to build facilities and furnishing.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 15


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The impossibility to make a design for the whole population forces us to pick a segment<br />

which includes the data in between. Thus, highest and lowest values are left out and focus on the<br />

90% of the population. As a norm, the practical totality of anthropometric data is expressed in<br />

percentiles. In order to make this research more effective, population is broken into percentages<br />

categories, sorted from lowest to highest according to a specific body measure. For example, the<br />

first height percentile indicates that 99% of the individuals measured would be above this<br />

dimension. In the same way, a percentile of 95% in height would state that only 5% of the<br />

individuals measured would be over it, since the remaining 95% would be just as tall or shorter.<br />

(Panero, 1993).<br />

3.4 Steps to get percentiles<br />

1. Summation of raw data is calculated In a spreadsheet (total of measures), mean or<br />

average is calculated using the following formula:<br />

= Data mean or average<br />

ΣX = Summation of the values of all the measures.<br />

n = Number of elements of the sample.<br />

2. Standard deviation it’s calculated, which defines the individual deviation of each<br />

measure regarding to the mean.<br />

s 2 = Variation of the sample.<br />

s = Standard variation of the sample.<br />

x = Value of the measures.<br />

= Mean of the sample.<br />

n - 1 = Number of measures of the sample -1<br />

3. Standard deviation of the unit it’s calculated, which is called “z”, where z equals to:<br />

x = Random variable value<br />

= Average distribution of the random variable.<br />

s = Standard variation of this distribution.<br />

z = Number of standard deviations of x regarding the mean of this distribution.<br />

(Navidi, 2006).<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 16<br />

(1)<br />

2<br />

3<br />

(4)


(DINBelg)<br />

4. Percentiles are calculated<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Since this is an ongoing research, some of the necessary measures are still missing in order to<br />

conduct a full test of the facilities and furnishing, however, there is an anthropometric chart with<br />

the data collected so far and it is possible to get preliminary results in order to get the dimensions<br />

for facilities and furnishing.<br />

In this example the dimensions of the sink and classroom chairs will be used.<br />

In order to calculate height and width for the sink measures 949 (height to the waist) and 752<br />

(distance from the wall to the center of the fist)<br />

Results for 949<br />

X = 61.55<br />

S = 4.88<br />

5 % = 61.55 – (4.88 x 1.65) = 53.498 cm (9)<br />

Results for 752<br />

X = 46.26<br />

S = 3.66<br />

5 % = 46.26 – (3.66 x 1.65) = 40.221 cm (10)<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 17<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

(8)


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 2. Sink dimensions<br />

In order for most of the children to be able to use the sink without any problems percentile 5<br />

from mean 949 and 752 was used.<br />

Measures 200 (length from the back of the knee to the back of the chair), 678 (height from<br />

the ground to the back side of the knee), 459 (width of hips, sitting down), 25 (height from the seat<br />

to the shoulder) are used in order to get the dimensions of the chair.<br />

Results for 200<br />

X = 28.82<br />

S = 2.13<br />

5 % = 28.82 – (2.13 x 1.65) = 25.3055 cm (11)<br />

Results for 678<br />

X = 28.98<br />

S = 2.38<br />

5 % = 28.98 – (2.38 x 1.65) = 25.053 cm (12)<br />

Results for 459<br />

X = 22.09<br />

S = 1.95<br />

5 % = 22.09 + (1.95 x 1.65) = 25.3075 cm (13)<br />

Results for 25<br />

X = 37.56<br />

S = 2.54<br />

5 % = 37.56 – (2.54 x 1.65) = 33.369 cm (14)<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 18


5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 3. Chair dimensions<br />

This research is extremely important since there are no anthropometric charts for pre-school level<br />

children in Mexico. These charts are used to build furnishing and determine the size of new<br />

schools buildings. This project aims to get the necessary information in order to build these charts.<br />

6. REFERENCES<br />

Flores G., Cecilia (1997) Antropometría Aplicada, Primer Encuentro Internacional de Ergonomía,<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Mérida, Mérida Yucatán.<br />

Oborne, David J. (1990 reimpresión 2001), Ergonomía en acción la adaptación del medio de<br />

trabajo al hombre. – 2ª edición – México: Trillas.<br />

INIFED (Instituto Nacional de la Infraestructura Física Educativa 2008), Normas y<br />

Especificaciones para Estudios, Proyectos, Construcción e Instalaciones, Volumen 3<br />

Habitabilidad y Funcionamiento, Tomo III Diseño de Mobiliario.<br />

http://www.inifed.gob.mx/templates/normas%20t%C3%A9cnicas.asp (Visited on May 15,<br />

2009).<br />

ERG<strong>OCUPACIONAL</strong> Uso de tablas antropométricas en ergonomía,<br />

http://www.ergocupacional.com/4910/35922.html (Visited on March 8, 2010).<br />

Panero Julios (1993) Las dimensiones humanas en los espacios interiores. Ed. G. Gili, S.A.<br />

México, D.F.<br />

Navidi William (2006) Estadística para ingenieros y científicos. McGraw-Hill Interamericana.<br />

México, D.F.<br />

DINBelg Body dimensions of the Belgian population Formulas,<br />

http://www.dinbelg.be/formulas.htm (Visited on March 8, 2010).<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 19


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

1<br />

M.C. Joaquín Vásquez Quiroga 1 , M.C. Jesús Rodolfo Guzmán Hernández 2 , Dr. Enrique Javier de<br />

la Vega Bustillos 3 .<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

<strong>DE</strong>SIGN ANTHROPOMETRIC REFERENCED LETTERS TO THE LABOR<br />

POPULATION OF CABORCA CITY IN SONORA MEXICO.<br />

Program Coordinator and Professor, Department of Physics, Mathematics and Engineering,<br />

Universidad de Sonora, Caborca Sonora, México.<br />

jovaqui@caborca.uson.mx<br />

Professor and Researcher at the Instituto Tecnológico de Hermosillo, Mexico<br />

e_delavega_mx@yahoo.com<br />

Professor, Department of Physics, Mathematics and Engineering<br />

Universidad de Sonora, Caborca, Sonora, México.<br />

rguz@caborca.uson.mx<br />

RESUMEN<br />

Esta investigación es el resultado de las mediciones de 50 variables antropométricas de 200<br />

personas en edad laboral de la Ciudad de Caborca Sonoro México, con el objetivo de poder<br />

hacer una aportación importante a la creación de cartas antropométricas para la población<br />

mexicana. En la actualidad son pocos los datos que se tienen de las medidas antropométricas de<br />

la población mexicana, haciéndose necesario utilizar las medidas de otros países en donde las<br />

condiciones y complexión física son diferentes.<br />

Las cartas antropométricas que aquí se obtuvieron están distribuidas por grupos de edad, sexo y<br />

lugar de origen. Este trabajo puede ser el inicio de investigaciones similares en otras poblaciones<br />

de México y llegar a tener un registro antropométrico del total de la población mexicana, para<br />

poder desarrollar estaciones o espacios de trabajo que se adapten a la población, herramientas,<br />

ropa, equipo de protección personal como cascos y guantes, calzado, lo mismo que lugares de<br />

descanso.<br />

Palabras claves: Cartas Antropométricas, Antropometría y Ergonomía.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This research is the result of 50 anthropometric measurements of 200 people of working age of<br />

Caborca Sonora Mexico City, in order to be able to make a significant contribution to creating<br />

cards for the Mexican population anthropometric. At present there are few data have<br />

anthropometric measurements of the Mexican population, making it necessary to use measures<br />

other countries where conditions and physique are different.<br />

The anthropometric letters were obtained here are divided by age, sex and place of origin. This<br />

work may be the beginning of similar investigations in other populations of Mexico and get to have<br />

a record of all anthropometric Mexican population, to develop stations or workspaces that are<br />

tailored to the people, tools, clothing, protective equipment personal as helmets and gloves,<br />

footwear, as well as resting places.<br />

Keywords: Anthropometric Letters, Anthropometry and Ergonomics.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 20


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

It is now of vital importance to take into account the design and the anatomic structure of<br />

individuals to understand and develop all those areas in which performance involves human<br />

beings, this is not new and has been studied before in different countries and not with measures<br />

aimed at the Mexicans. The purpose of a study of this type is able to physically help the worker in<br />

all areas where it is involved, such as designing work spaces suitable for each person, the design<br />

of tools, safety equipment and personal protection clothing, and have references dimensional<br />

population.<br />

With all the technological advances that have occurred, you can have a better life, as<br />

studies have been developed in several areas, one of them is the anthropometry, with which they<br />

determine the dimensions of the human body, in this area there are some studies in developed<br />

countries, but very few of the Mexican population. Hence the interest start recording<br />

anthropometric data, thinking about making a contribution to the creation of anthropometric cards<br />

to this population. The creation of these cards is essential to have a population register, in order<br />

to make designs of stations, the design of tools and equipment, etc.., Always trying the user is<br />

comfortable and without risk of injury by position not normal. This is important to understand their<br />

measurement and to determine the field of development or dimensional capabilities that people<br />

have. For this reason the study will focus to working anthropometric cards of population of H.<br />

Caborca, Sonora, and this is an important input to record anthropometric measurements of the<br />

Mexican population.<br />

Throughout history, many investigations that have been developed in the area of<br />

anthropometry. In more current times these investigations have risen to be an important support<br />

for ergonomics, this is the case:<br />

Annis (1996) did an analysis of anthropometric changes the size and body shapes as they<br />

get older people, to see the implications of these changes in the dimensions of workspaces.<br />

Gosseens (1998) studied the dimensions of the seats of five different types of civil aircraft.<br />

The results were compared with existing standards and biomechanical criteria. It was evident that<br />

these seats failed to meet requirements of depth, slope, height of lumbar support and armrests.<br />

Therefore, none of these seats allow the pilot was in a comfortable sitting posture. In comparison<br />

with aviation standards, the anthropometric dimensions were not satisfactory.<br />

Panagiotopoulou (2003) developed a study for the purpose of comparing the size of<br />

primary school students, with the dimensions of the desks, to determine if the dimensions of the<br />

furniture is well designed and see if they promote good posture sitting considering the dimensions<br />

of children.<br />

Jung (2005) developed a prototype of an adjustable chair for educational institutions, where<br />

they assess their suitability according to international standards. His research began with simple<br />

mechanisms for adjusting the height of chair legs and backrest height and seat depth.<br />

In Mexico, these investigations have increased due to the recommendations made in the<br />

Federal Regulation on Safety, Hygiene and Environment Working in Article 102 and as SEMAC<br />

associations (Society of ergonomic Mexicana AC), which organizes conferences in presented<br />

research papers such as:<br />

Ergonomic design for computer work stations, presented by Martinez (2000).<br />

Implementation of an ergonomic process for the industry for control musculoskeletal<br />

injuries, presented by Sánchez (2002).<br />

Research and Ergonomics in Mexico, presented by de la Vega (2004).<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 21


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

In developing this work is clearly important that represents the human resources within an<br />

organization, since this depends on the effectiveness of the production process. Therefore, the<br />

objective of the development of this research is the creation of letters of the anthropometric<br />

measurements of the working population of the City of Caborca, by age group, sex and place of<br />

origin.<br />

Obtaining anthropometric cards may be made designs for the population, helping<br />

businesses and people in general. Currently there are very few reliable records of the<br />

anthropometric dimensions of these people, so it is taken as the measures of other countries<br />

where physique is different and the conditions too.<br />

When designing industrial products is important to provide who are the users to succeed in<br />

the product, taking into account different body sizes, safety and human comfort, it is here that<br />

involves anthropometry (Reeder 2003).<br />

Hence the great importance of anthropometric data to researchers from the human factor,<br />

for practical use with these, such as would be the design of clothing, tools, to provide statistical<br />

guidelines for product design and build models biomechanical. (Park, Kim 1997).<br />

According Cavassa (2004) there are two types of anthropometrics: anthropometry static or<br />

structural, which refers to the dimensions in which the body is in static state, for example, height,<br />

weight, etc.<br />

The other type is the dynamic anthropometry: it refers to taking action where the body is<br />

operating, for example stretching one arm to reach something.<br />

At the time of wanting to design, there are some factors that influence the anatomical<br />

structure of the human body are: age (until maturity), sex (male, female), race, occupation,<br />

clothing (especially in cold weather ) and even the time of day (in the morning the people are<br />

measuring 6 mm more, because the spinal discs are not compressed (Konz 1999).<br />

When will develop designs for a group of people is important to take into account some<br />

principles such as:<br />

1. Design principle to extremes: this design takes the maximum and minimum value of the<br />

characteristics of user populations.<br />

2. Adjustable design principle: it is used for facilities and equipment that can be adapted to various<br />

individuals.<br />

3. Design principle for the average: this approach is less expensive but less used, since it is<br />

difficult to get the design that fits 50% of the population (Niebel 2001)<br />

The anthropometric cards is to develop a record of human body stockings for people to<br />

have a higher confidence level to develop a design such as a workstation, machinery, equipment,<br />

clothing, etc. such is the case study by Mohammad (2005) which record some measures of hand.<br />

There are an infinite number of steps you can take the human body as recommended by the<br />

manual of procedures (Secretariat 2002). For the case study of this work, selected 50 of them,<br />

according to the definitions used in similar anthropometric examinations conducted by the<br />

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA 1978).<br />

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

For the development of the research team used the following:<br />

• three anthropometer model 01140, 01290 and 01291 marks Lafayette.<br />

• One stadimeter marks Seca.<br />

• One analog scale marks Seca.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 22


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

• Two measuring tape marks Powerlock Stanley.<br />

• Two flexible tapes.<br />

• Two calibrators marks Chicago Brand.<br />

• Two chairs designed with a height adjustment system.<br />

• One calibrated cone diameter grip.<br />

• One computer for recording information.<br />

The methodology for taking the measures was as follows:<br />

It had a special area for training and standardization process of the four assistants in order to<br />

achieve uniformity in the way of measuring.<br />

The measurements were conducted in a private room and quiet, being present only the<br />

individual, the analyst and an assistant.<br />

People who were measured were treated with respect and care, trying to earn their trust.<br />

Before the measurement was given a brief explanation of the steps, procedures and<br />

requirements for measurement.<br />

Was prepared and calibrated all equipment necessary to make anthropometric measurements,<br />

ensuring that all necessary materials are available.<br />

To begin with the taking of measures, the person must wear few clothes, nothing in the head<br />

or feet, the surface of the floor, seat or platform must be flat, horizontal and non-compressible,<br />

measure the right side of the person. At the time of the measures breathing should be light.<br />

The 50 measures that were recorded for each person are:<br />

Code Name of the measure<br />

N920 Weight<br />

N805 Stature<br />

N328 Standing eye height to<br />

N23 Standing shoulder height<br />

N309 The standing elbow height<br />

N949 Standing waist height<br />

N398 Height standing gluteus<br />

N973 Standing tall on the wrist<br />

N265 Standing height to the middle finger<br />

N797 Width arms outstretched<br />

N798 Width at center chest elbows<br />

N80 Arm length from the wall<br />

N752 Distance from wall to the center of the fist<br />

N122 Standing shoulder width<br />

N223 Standing chest width<br />

N457 Standing Hip Width<br />

N639 Standing neck circumference<br />

N230 Standing chest circumference<br />

N931 Waist circumference stands<br />

N178 Standing hip circumference<br />

N430 Head circumference<br />

N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head<br />

N165 Face width to the height of the pins<br />

N427 Head width<br />

N595 Height of the chin to the top of head<br />

N441 Head length<br />

N420 Length of hand<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 23


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

N656 Length of the palm<br />

N411 Width of palm<br />

N402 Grip diameter<br />

N758 Seat height sitting at the head<br />

N330 Seat height sitting in the eye<br />

N25 Seat height sitting shoulder<br />

N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90<br />

N856 Sitting thigh-high<br />

N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting<br />

N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up<br />

N2FGM Height of sitting down<br />

N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit<br />

N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair<br />

N194 Length from knee to back of chair<br />

N678 Height from floor to knee back<br />

N529 Height from floor to knee<br />

N381 Length from elbow to middle finger<br />

N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front<br />

N459 Seated hip width<br />

N859 Width thighs with knees together<br />

N775 Leg length<br />

N777 Foot width<br />

N776 High instep<br />

Was measured at 200 and will be an analysis of data from the 200 people using the<br />

spreadsheet Excel, the result will reflect the percentiles 5%, 50% and 95%, the maximum and<br />

minimum of each measurements.<br />

3. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS<br />

The results of research carried out in each of the measurements are shown in the tables or charts<br />

anthropometric working population of Caborca, Sonora, as follows:<br />

Table 1 shows the total data by age group and sex in years, in tables 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8<br />

shows the results of the analysis of the 50 measures anthropometric research by age, sex and<br />

place of origin.<br />

The tables show the calculation of the percentiles 5, 50 and 95%, and the maximum and<br />

minimum measurements. The calculations were analyzed in the Excel spreadsheet. The weight<br />

calculation is given in kilograms, the other measures are in centimeters.<br />

Table 1 Distribution of data by age group and sex.<br />

SEX<br />

AGE MEN WOMEN TOTALS<br />

18-20 69 24 93<br />

21-23 49 26 75<br />

24-27 24 8 32<br />

TOTALS 142 58 200<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 24


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 2 Results of analysis of measures for the age ranges of 18-20 years.<br />

Percentile<br />

Code Name of the measure 5% 50% 95% MIN MAX<br />

N920 Weight 48.6 68 93.4 40 105<br />

N805 Stature 156.8 170.5 183.4 151.1 194<br />

N328 Standing eye height to 145.3 160.2 173.6 140.5 182.4<br />

N23 Standing shoulder height 130.6 142.8 153.3 126 167.5<br />

N309 The standing elbow height 98.8 108.2 117.3 95.6 129.2<br />

N949 Standing waist height 93.6 102.5 110.4 92 121.7<br />

N398 Height standing gluteus 68.1 74 86.1 62 96.4<br />

N973 Standing tall on the wrist 75.4 83.6 90.3 71 105<br />

N265 Standing height to the middle finger 59.1 64.9 71.1 56 78.1<br />

N797 Width arms outstretched 156.6 175.1 187.2 150.7 200.7<br />

N798 Width at center chest elbows 79.3 91.5 97.2 68.3 99.4<br />

N80 Arm length from the wall 76.9 89.3 115 68.5 118<br />

N752 Distance from wall to the center of the fist 66.5 75.7 106.5 64.8 111<br />

N122 Standing shoulder width 37 43.3 48.1 34.5 54<br />

N223 Standing chest width 26.4 30.4 35 24.3 38.4<br />

N457 Standing Hip Width 31 35.4 39.8 30.3 46.7<br />

N639 Standing neck circumference 31.3 37 41.6 29.7 44<br />

N230 Standing chest circumference 81 94.5 110.2 77 117<br />

N931 Waist circumference stands 67.1 85 105.2 64.5 115.2<br />

N178 Standing hip circumference 90.3 102 117.9 84.7 127<br />

N430 Head circumference 54 57 60.5 52.5 98.4<br />

N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head 34.5 37 39.8 32.3 55<br />

N165 Face width to the height of the pins 12.9 14.4 15.7 11.7 15.9<br />

N427 Head width 14.5 15.5 16.9 12 17.9<br />

N595 Height of the chin to the top of head 20 23 25.2 18.5 25.7<br />

N441 Head length 17.5 19 20.3 16.4 20.9<br />

N420 Length of hand 16.4 18.5 19.8 16.1 21.2<br />

N656 Length of the palm 9.4 10.6 11.4 9.2 12.3<br />

N411 Width of palm 7.3 8.4 9.3 6.9 9.8<br />

N402 Grip diameter 4.2 4.8 5.6 3.5 6.5<br />

N758 Seat height sitting at the head 82 88.8 95.5 79 100.5<br />

N330 Seat height sitting in the eye 71.5 78 84.2 64.6 90.2<br />

N25 Seat height sitting shoulder 57 61.5 66.6 54.3 68.5<br />

N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90 22 26 29 19.4 38<br />

N856 Sitting thigh-high 13.5 16 18.8 12 21<br />

N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting 119.5 132.3 145.7 114 148.5<br />

N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up 110.2 121.3 133.7 104.2 136.3<br />

N2FGM Height of sitting down 121.9 130 139.2 115.5 143.4<br />

N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit 37.8 42 45.6 36 47.2<br />

N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair 41 45.4 51 39.1 56.7<br />

N194 Length from knee to back of chair 53.2 59.2 66.5 48.4 72.3<br />

N678 Height from floor to knee back 37 42.3 45.4 33.5 49<br />

N529 Height from floor to knee 48.4 54.3 58.9 30.4 64.2<br />

N381 Length from elbow to middle finger 42.3 48 51.5 41.1 53<br />

N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front 37.2 42 46.9 32.7 49.9<br />

N459 Seated hip width 35.5 39.1 46.2 32 49.3<br />

N859 Width thighs with knees together 29.8 33.3 40 26.1 49.8<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 25


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

N775 Leg length 22.8 26 28.5 21.6 30.4<br />

N777 Foot width 8.6 9.7 10.7 8 11.2<br />

N776 High instep 6.2 8.3 10 5 12.3<br />

Table 3 Results of analysis of measures for the age ranges of 21-23 years.<br />

Percentile<br />

Code Name of the measure 5% 50% 95% MIN MAX<br />

N920 Weight 51.7 68 106.3 47 132<br />

N805 Stature 153.5 168 181.3 148 184<br />

N328 Standing eye height to 142.2 157.5 169.8 138 174.2<br />

N23 Standing shoulder height 128 140.6 152 126 185.5<br />

N309 The standing elbow height 97 106.3 116.2 90.8 123.8<br />

N949 Standing waist height 93 100 111.3 91 116<br />

N398 Height standing gluteus 64.4 74 82.7 59 106.8<br />

N973 Standing tall on the wrist 73.6 82 92.2 69 95.3<br />

N265 Standing height to the middle finger 56.9 65 72.4 55 75.8<br />

N797 Width arms outstretched 153.7 172 186.3 152 189.6<br />

N798 Width at center chest elbows 77.9 89.2 95.6 64 98.2<br />

N80 Arm length from the wall 77.5 98 115.7 73.3 128.7<br />

N752 Distance from wall to the center of the fist 68 92 105.4 61.7 112<br />

N122 Standing shoulder width 37.4 42.8 48.3 35.5 51.1<br />

N223 Standing chest width 27.1 30.2 35.9 25.5 40<br />

N457 Standing Hip Width 32.4 35.7 43.2 30.5 45.2<br />

N639 Standing neck circumference 31 36.9 41.7 29.5 46<br />

N230 Standing chest circumference 85.9 96 118.2 83 124.5<br />

N931 Waist circumference stands 70 85 115.3 56 125.4<br />

N178 Standing hip circumference 93.9 104 125.7 91 135.5<br />

N430 Head circumference 54 56.8 59.2 53.5 61<br />

N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head 34 37 39.6 33.5 41<br />

N165 Face width to the height of the pins 12.9 14 15.8 12 16.7<br />

N427 Head width 14.1 15.5 16.5 12 16.8<br />

N595 Height of the chin to the top of head 19.5 22.2 24.8 19 25.8<br />

N441 Head length 17.4 18.9 20.5 17 24.6<br />

N420 Length of hand 16.4 18.1 19.7 15.6 20.5<br />

N656 Length of the palm 9.1 10.4 11.4 7.8 19.2<br />

N411 Width of palm 7.2 8.4 9.3 6.5 9.5<br />

N402 Grip diameter 4 4.7 5.4 3.4 5.6<br />

N758 Seat height sitting at the head 80.6 88 93.8 79 95<br />

N330 Seat height sitting in the eye 70.9 77.2 82.4 66.7 84<br />

N25 Seat height sitting shoulder 56 60.9 70.3 53.5 83<br />

N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90 22 26 30.7 19.2 39<br />

N856 Sitting thigh-high 13.1 16 19.9 12 21.5<br />

N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting 118.3 132.2 141 113.4 145<br />

N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up 110 122.4 129.8 103.3 140.5<br />

N2FGM Height of sitting down 119 130 137 115.4 140<br />

N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit 37.3 41 45 36 46.5<br />

N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair 40.1 46 50.1 39.7 55<br />

N194 Length from knee to back of chair 52.7 59 64.4 51 70.5<br />

N678 Height from floor to knee back 36.6 42 46 35.5 50.9<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 26


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

N529 Height from floor to knee 47.3 54 58.6 43.4 65.5<br />

N381 Length from elbow to middle finger 40.9 46.6 51 40 54<br />

N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front 36.7 41.6 46.1 34 47.7<br />

N459 Seated hip width 35.5 39 46 29 54.7<br />

N859 Width thighs with knees together 30 33.5 40.2 28.4 46.8<br />

N775 Leg length 22.7 25.5 27.8 22 28.6<br />

N777 Foot width 8.4 9.8 11 8 12<br />

N776 High instep 5.9 8 9.2 5 10.5<br />

Table 4 Results of analysis of measures for the age ranges of 24-27 years.<br />

Percentile<br />

Code Name of the measure 5% 50% 95% MIN MAX<br />

N920 Weight 57.6 74.5 108.4 50 138<br />

N805 Stature 158.9 171 183.3 156 187<br />

N328 Standing eye height to 147.3 161 169.7 132 177.6<br />

N23 Standing shoulder height 132 142.5 153.8 131 159.3<br />

N309 The standing elbow height 102.3 107.5 117.5 100.5 119<br />

N949 Standing waist height 91.3 101 109 85 113<br />

N398 Height standing gluteus 65 73 80.7 62 89<br />

N973 Standing tall on the wrist 76.1 81 92.2 68.5 92.8<br />

N265 Standing height to the middle finger 59.8 65.1 72.9 58.5 74<br />

N797 Width arms outstretched 160 174 188.2 155 193<br />

N798 Width at center chest elbows 85 91 96.3 83 99<br />

N80 Arm length from the wall 81.3 95.2 116.3 77 122.5<br />

N752 Distance from wall to the center of the fist 62.8 87.2 106.7 60 107<br />

N122 Standing shoulder width 38 44.7 49.5 36.2 52.9<br />

N223 Standing chest width 27.6 32 37.3 26.2 41.4<br />

N457 Standing Hip Width 31.6 36 44.2 31.5 76.5<br />

N639 Standing neck circumference 32.6 38 44 31 44.8<br />

N230 Standing chest circumference 86.6 98.4 117.5 85.5 150<br />

N931 Waist circumference stands 74.8 90 120 70 151.8<br />

N178 Standing hip circumference 94.6 107.2 122.9 93 149.5<br />

N430 Head circumference 54.8 57.5 60 54 60<br />

N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head 34.6 36.8 40 34 40<br />

N165 Face width to the height of the pins 12.5 14.1 16.1 11.4 16.2<br />

N427 Head width 14.4 15.3 16.7 12.4 17<br />

N595 Height of the chin to the top of head 20.9 23 27.1 20 29<br />

N441 Head length 17 19 20.2 16 20.6<br />

N420 Length of hand 17 18.6 20 17 20.1<br />

N656 Length of the palm 9.6 10.7 11.3 9.5 22<br />

N411 Width of palm 7.3 8.7 9.1 7 9.3<br />

N402 Grip diameter 4 4.9 5.6 3.8 5.8<br />

N758 Seat height sitting at the head 84.3 88.2 93.2 83 98<br />

N330 Seat height sitting in the eye 72.9 77.1 83 70 84.5<br />

N25 Seat height sitting shoulder 58 61 68.1 57 83<br />

N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90 21.8 27.2 29.8 21 32<br />

N856 Sitting thigh-high 13.7 16.3 18.9 13 20<br />

N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting 122.4 131.8 140.8 117.4 150<br />

N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up 111.7 122 129.7 109.4 138<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 27


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

N2FGM Height of sitting down 123.6 130 137.8 121.5 139<br />

N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit 37.6 41.8 46.2 37 47<br />

N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair 41.4 45.3 49.1 40 53.5<br />

N194 Length from knee to back of chair 55.4 58.2 65 53 67.2<br />

N678 Height from floor to knee back 37.8 42.7 46.3 36 48.5<br />

N529 Height from floor to knee 50.4 55.3 61 49.5 63.2<br />

N381 Length from elbow to middle finger 43.6 47 49.5 41 50.3<br />

N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front 37.2 43 47.8 35 49.7<br />

N459 Seated hip width 36.3 39.5 48.4 36 56.4<br />

N859 Width thighs with knees together 29.3 34.6 43.8 27.5 52.6<br />

N775 Leg length 23.1 26 28.3 23 30<br />

N777 Foot width 9 9.7 11 8.7 11<br />

N776 High instep 6.1 8 10 6 10<br />

Table 5 Results of analysis of measures for female.<br />

Percentile<br />

Code Name of the measure 5% 50% 95% MIN MAX<br />

N920 Weight 46.9 57.5 95 40 138<br />

N805 Stature 151 160 172 148 172.8<br />

N328 Standing eye height to 140.9 149.4 159.7 138 161.6<br />

N23 Standing shoulder height 126.9 133 142.4 126 147<br />

N309 The standing elbow height 96.8 102.9 109.9 94 114<br />

N949 Standing waist height 92.6 98.5 106.5 85 109<br />

N398 Height standing gluteus 66.3 72.4 80.1 61.5 82.7<br />

N973 Standing tall on the wrist 73 79.4 85.8 71 87<br />

N265 Standing height to the middle finger 56.4 62.1 68.1 56 69.9<br />

N797 Width arms outstretched 152.4 160.4 176.5 150.7 177<br />

N798 Width at center chest elbows 73.9 83.5 89.6 64 93.7<br />

N80 Arm length from the wall 75.5 81.8 106.5 73.3 114<br />

N752 Distance from wall to the center of the fist 64.7 71.7 98.9 61.7 104.5<br />

N122 Standing shoulder width 35.5 39.6 46.6 34.5 52.9<br />

N223 Standing chest width 26 29 35.4 24.3 41.4<br />

N457 Standing Hip Width 32.6 35.6 45 30.3 46.7<br />

N639 Standing neck circumference 30 33 38.2 29.5 44.8<br />

N230 Standing chest circumference 82.8 92.5 118.5 79.8 150<br />

N931 Waist circumference stands 66 77.5 112.2 64.5 151.8<br />

N178 Standing hip circumference 92.7 99.2 127.2 84.7 149.5<br />

N430 Head circumference 53.5 56 58.2 53 98.4<br />

N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head 33.9 36 38.7 33 39<br />

N165 Face width to the height of the pins 12.3 13.5 15.1 11.4 15.8<br />

N427 Head width 14.2 15.1 16.2 12 17.9<br />

N595 Height of the chin to the top of head 19 22 24.2 18.5 29<br />

N441 Head length 17.1 18.5 20 16.4 20.3<br />

N420 Length of hand 16.1 17.5 18.9 15.6 19.4<br />

N656 Length of the palm 9 9.7 11.2 7.8 19.2<br />

N411 Width of palm 7 7.5 8.5 6.5 9.3<br />

N402 Grip diameter 3.9 4.5 5 3.5 5.6<br />

N758 Seat height sitting at the head 79.5 85 89.4 79 93<br />

N330 Seat height sitting in the eye 69.8 74.1 78.3 66.3 81.7<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 28


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

N25 Seat height sitting shoulder 55.8 59 63.5 53.5 69<br />

N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90 22 26.6 29.6 20.5 39<br />

N856 Sitting thigh-high 12.6 15.2 18.7 12 21.5<br />

N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting 114.9 123.7 133.1 113.4 135<br />

N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up 108 115 122.5 103.3 127.7<br />

N2FGM Height of sitting down 117 124.8 131.1 115.4 134.1<br />

N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit 37 39.2 44 36 45.1<br />

N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair 40 44 49 39.1 49.2<br />

N194 Length from knee to back of chair 51 56.9 61.4 48.4 65.4<br />

N678 Height from floor to knee back 36 38.9 43.1 35.5 44<br />

N529 Height from floor to knee 46.6 51.1 55.3 30.4 56<br />

N381 Length from elbow to middle finger 40.7 44 47 40 49.1<br />

N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front 35.5 39.9 43.6 33 48.6<br />

N459 Seated hip width 35.1 39 49.2 32.7 56.4<br />

N859 Width thighs with knees together 30 33.7 42.8 28.5 52.6<br />

N775 Leg length 22 23.8 25.1 21.6 27.2<br />

N777 Foot width 8.1 9 10 8 10.3<br />

N776 High instep 6 7.7 9 5 9.7<br />

Table 6 Results of analysis of measures for male.<br />

Percentile<br />

Code Name of the measure 5% 50% 95% MIN MAX<br />

N920 Weight 57.1 73 100.9 49 132<br />

N805 Stature 163 172 183.8 156.7 194<br />

N328 Standing eye height to 151 161.5 174 132 182.4<br />

N23 Standing shoulder height 135.2 144.2 153.5 132 185.5<br />

N309 The standing elbow height 102 109.7 118 90.8 129.2<br />

N949 Standing waist height 94.1 103 111.4 91 121.7<br />

N398 Height standing gluteus 65 74.7 88.6 59 106.8<br />

N973 Standing tall on the wrist 76 84 92.5 68.5 105<br />

N265 Standing height to the middle finger 59 66 73.4 55 78.1<br />

N797 Width arms outstretched 166 177.4 189.2 160.5 200.7<br />

N798 Width at center chest elbows 86.3 92.1 97.5 68.3 99.4<br />

N80 Arm length from the wall 84.2 93 116.6 68.5 128.7<br />

N752 Distance from wall to the center of the fist 72 79.8 107 60 112<br />

N122 Standing shoulder width 41 44.6 49.3 36.6 54<br />

N223 Standing chest width 28 31 36.4 25.7 40<br />

N457 Standing Hip Width 31.5 35.6 39.2 30.3 76.5<br />

N639 Standing neck circumference 34 37.9 42.5 32.8 46<br />

N230 Standing chest circumference 85.1 96.5 116.3 77 124.4<br />

N931 Waist circumference stands 73.1 87 111.4 56 126<br />

N178 Standing hip circumference 94 104 117.8 87 135.5<br />

N430 Head circumference 54 57 60 52.5 86.5<br />

N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head 34.5 37 40 32.3 55<br />

N165 Face width to the height of the pins 13 14.5 16 12.5 16.7<br />

N427 Head width 14.5 15.6 16.6 12.4 17.7<br />

N595 Height of the chin to the top of head 20.5 23 25.4 18.9 28.8<br />

N441 Head length 17.5 19 20.6 16 24.6<br />

N420 Length of hand 17.4 18.8 20 17 21.2<br />

N656 Length of the palm 10 10.7 11.4 9.5 22<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 29


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

N411 Width of palm 7.9 8.7 9.3 7.5 9.8<br />

N402 Grip diameter 4.1 4.9 5.6 3.4 6.5<br />

N758 Seat height sitting at the head 84 89.6 95.1 81 100.5<br />

N330 Seat height sitting in the eye 73 79 84 64.6 90.2<br />

N25 Seat height sitting shoulder 58 62 67.5 56 83<br />

N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90 22 26 29.5 19.2 32<br />

N856 Sitting thigh-high 14 16.4 19.4 12.4 21<br />

N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting 127.2 134.3 145 119 150<br />

N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up 117 124 134 111.5 140.5<br />

N2FGM Height of sitting down 123.6 131.5 139 120.4 143.4<br />

N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit 38.5 42.3 46 36.5 47.2<br />

N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair 42 46 51.2 40 56.7<br />

N194 Length from knee to back of chair 55.7 60 66 52 72.3<br />

N678 Height from floor to knee back 39.2 43 46.7 33.5 50.9<br />

N529 Height from floor to knee 52.4 55.5 60.2 50.4 65.5<br />

N381 Length from elbow to middle finger 45 48 51.5 41.6 54<br />

N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front 38.4 43 47.2 32.7 49.9<br />

N459 Seated hip width 35.7 39.2 46 29 54.7<br />

N859 Width thighs with knees together 29.7 33.6 41.5 26.1 49.8<br />

N775 Leg length 24.7 26.4 28.6 24 30.4<br />

N777 Foot width 9 10 11 8.5 12<br />

N776 High instep 6 8.3 10 5 12.3<br />

Table 7 Results of analysis of measures for Caborca people<br />

Percentile<br />

Code Name of the measure 5% 50% 95% MIN MAX<br />

N920 Weight 50 69 100.9 40 138<br />

N805 Stature 155.1 169.1 183 148 194<br />

N328 Standing eye height to 143.3 158.4 173.2 132 182.4<br />

N23 Standing shoulder height 130.1 141.6 152.9 126 185.5<br />

N309 The standing elbow height 98 107.1 117.4 90.8 129.2<br />

N949 Standing waist height 93 101.5 110.5 85 121.7<br />

N398 Height standing gluteus 65.1 74 85.5 59 106.8<br />

N973 Standing tall on the wrist 75 82.5 92 68.5 105<br />

N265 Standing height to the middle finger 58 64.9 72.6 55 78.1<br />

N797 Width arms outstretched 155.1 174 187.6 150.7 200.7<br />

N798 Width at center chest elbows 79 90.2 97.3 64 99.4<br />

N80 Arm length from the wall 77.3 91.3 115.2 68.5 128.7<br />

N752 Distance from wall to the center of the fist 66.2 78.9 106.7 60 112<br />

N122 Standing shoulder width 37 43.2 48.5 34.5 54<br />

N223 Standing chest width 26.8 30.7 36.8 24.3 41.4<br />

N457 Standing Hip Width 31.6 35.6 42.5 30.3 76.5<br />

N639 Standing neck circumference 31 37 42 29.5 46<br />

N230 Standing chest circumference 84 95.9 117 77 150<br />

N931 Waist circumference stands 68.1 85.2 112 56 151.8<br />

N178 Standing hip circumference 93 103.3 121 84.7 149.5<br />

N430 Head circumference 54 57 60 52.5 98.4<br />

N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head 34 37 40 32.3 55<br />

N165 Face width to the height of the pins 12.9 14.2 15.9 11.4 16.7<br />

N427 Head width 14.5 15.4 16.6 12 17.9<br />

N595 Height of the chin to the top of head 19.6 22.8 25.4 18.5 29<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 30


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

N441 Head length 17.3 19 20.4 16 24.6<br />

N420 Length of hand 16.5 18.4 19.8 15.6 21.2<br />

N656 Length of the palm 9.3 10.5 11.4 7.8 22<br />

N411 Width of palm 7.2 8.5 9.3 6.5 9.8<br />

N402 Grip diameter 4 4.7 5.5 3.4 6.5<br />

N758 Seat height sitting at the head 82 88.3 95 79 100.5<br />

N330 Seat height sitting in the eye 71 77.4 83.7 64.6 90.2<br />

N25 Seat height sitting shoulder 56.8 61 67.3 54.3 83<br />

N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90 22 26.3 29.5 19.2 39<br />

N856 Sitting thigh-high 13.1 16 19.4 12 21.5<br />

N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting 119 132 142.4 113.4 150<br />

N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up 110 121.8 131.9 103.3 140.5<br />

N2FGM Height of sitting down 121 130 138.9 115.4 143.4<br />

N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit 37.6 41.6 46 36 47.2<br />

N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair 40.5 45.3 51 39.1 56.7<br />

N194 Length from knee to back of chair 53 59 65.5 48.4 72.3<br />

N678 Height from floor to knee back 36.7 42.1 46 33.5 50.9<br />

N529 Height from floor to knee 48.5 54.5 59.9 30.4 65.5<br />

N381 Length from elbow to middle finger 42 47 51.4 40 54<br />

N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front 37 42 47.1 32.7 49.9<br />

N459 Seated hip width 35.5 39.1 46.5 29 56.4<br />

N859 Width thighs with knees together 29.8 33.6 42.1 26.1 52.6<br />

N775 Leg length 22.9 25.9 28.4 21.6 30.4<br />

N777 Foot width 8.5 9.8 11 8 12<br />

N776 High instep 6 8 10 5 12.3<br />

Table 8 Results of analysis of measures for Caborca not native people.<br />

Percentile<br />

Code Name of the measure 5% 50% 95% MIN MAX<br />

N920 Weight 50.3 68.0 89.7 46.0 105.0<br />

N805 Stature 154.2 171.7 180.2 150.6 184.2<br />

N328 Standing eye height to 144.3 161.0 170.8 143.0 175.0<br />

N23 Standing shoulder height 128.6 144.2 152.5 128.1 155.0<br />

N309 The standing elbow height 97.3 111.5 114.5 97.0 117.0<br />

N949 Standing waist height 92.6 101.8 111.5 92.4 114.0<br />

N398 Height standing gluteus 66.9 73.1 83.2 61.5 84.0<br />

N973 Standing tall on the wrist 75.0 84.7 89.2 73.0 90.0<br />

N265 Standing height to the middle finger 58.1 65.4 70.6 58.0 71.0<br />

N797 Width arms outstretched 153.7 174.3 186.2 152.0 187.0<br />

N798 Width at center chest elbows 77.0 91.3 94.7 74.3 95.0<br />

N80 Arm length from the wall 76.0 92.7 116.2 73.3 117.0<br />

N752 Distance from wall to the center of the fist 66.2 78.3 105.3 63.1 107.0<br />

N122 Standing shoulder width 37.5 43.8 48.3 35.7 49.8<br />

N223 Standing chest width 27.0 29.9 35.2 26.6 36.4<br />

N457 Standing Hip Width 31.8 35.6 37.2 30.5 38.1<br />

N639 Standing neck circumference 31.9 36.5 39.8 31.0 44.0<br />

N230 Standing chest circumference 86.6 95.0 113.6 84.0 117.0<br />

N931 Waist circumference stands 73.8 85.2 109.1 70.0 115.2<br />

N178 Standing hip circumference 94.4 101.8 112.9 91.0 117.8<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 31


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

N430 Head circumference 53.9 56.0 57.7 53.5 59.0<br />

N144 Distance from ear to ear on the head 33.9 36.0 39.2 33.5 40.0<br />

N165 Face width to the height of the pins 12.4 14.3 15.2 12.3 15.9<br />

N427 Head width 14.2 15.7 16.6 14.0 17.3<br />

N595 Height of the chin to the top of head 19.9 23.0 25.0 19.4 25.3<br />

N441 Head length 17.3 18.2 19.1 17.0 19.2<br />

N420 Length of hand 16.5 18.1 20.0 16.3 20.1<br />

N656 Length of the palm 9.4 10.5 12.7 9.4 19.2<br />

N411 Width of palm 7.4 8.5 9.3 7.3 9.3<br />

N402 Grip diameter 4.1 4.9 5.6 3.9 6.4<br />

N758 Seat height sitting at the head 82.0 89.0 92.7 79.0 95.2<br />

N330 Seat height sitting in the eye 72.7 78.5 82.1 69.0 82.6<br />

N25 Seat height sitting shoulder 57.3 61.7 68.6 53.5 83.0<br />

N312 Seat height to seated elbow to 90 22.2 25.5 28.7 22.0 29.6<br />

N856 Sitting thigh-high 14.2 16.2 18.3 13.7 19.8<br />

N914 Seat height to the middle finger sitting 119.5 132.6 141.0 116.6 146.5<br />

N912 Height to the center of the cuff arms up 112.9 122.8 130.1 107.8 136.3<br />

N2FGM Height of sitting down 120.5 130.0 137.7 117.5 141.4<br />

N4FGM Seat height from floor to sit 37.1 41.0 45.3 36.5 45.3<br />

N200 Back of the knee to the back of chair 41.9 46.1 49.0 41.0 49.2<br />

N194 Length from knee to back of chair 54.3 60.9 63.2 52.5 64.0<br />

N678 Height from floor to knee back 36.9 41.9 45.0 36.6 45.0<br />

N529 Height from floor to knee 47.3 54.2 58.2 47.0 58.5<br />

N381 Length from elbow to middle finger 41.5 46.5 49.7 40.7 50.6<br />

N507 Back Width arms outstretched in front 36.9 42.9 45.1 36.1 45.3<br />

N459 Seated hip width 36.9 38.2 45.2 36.6 46.2<br />

N859 Width thighs with knees together 30.9 33.6 37.9 30.0 42.8<br />

N775 Leg length 22.5 25.7 28.0 21.8 28.3<br />

N777 Foot width 8.4 9.8 10.7 8.3 11.0<br />

N776 High instep 6.9 8.1 9.4 6.3 9.9<br />

4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Working conditions are an important issue, so it should be taken into account when<br />

designing a workspace, thereby, the worker will feel more comfortable and secure and will result<br />

in higher productivity, lower absenteeism, fewer accidents, lower turnover, etc. To achieve this it is<br />

necessary to design each station or place of work according to the needs of the population that<br />

will occupy this space, this implies knowing the dimensions of the population, if not known, it can<br />

hardly meet the target, however when known, can have an assurance that the highest percentage<br />

of people who use the work area, will have no problems in terms of size and awkward postures.<br />

By creating a product would be recommended to be used without problem by the largest<br />

number of users. The reality is that many products do not have the ability to adapt to 100% of<br />

users. For this you can follow two paths, the first would make products of various sizes in such a<br />

way that takes the opportunity to choose the one that best suits the needs of the user, the other<br />

would be to create products that are adjustable over a range measures, making it necessary to<br />

know the cost-benefits so that decision making is correct. The selection of some of the<br />

alternatives mentioned above would be facilitated if known anthropometric dimensions of the<br />

population that is expected to address. From the above highlights the importance of the results of<br />

this research.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 32


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

From this research were obtained anthropometric records or letters of the working<br />

population of the city of Caborca, Sonora, Mexico, in the age ranges from 18 to 20, 21 to 23 and<br />

24 to 27 years, and the letter Anthropometric women and men, those from Caborca and not<br />

originating in Caborca. These letters reflect the measures of the population having an age range<br />

from 18 to 27 years, within which 71% are men and 29% are women, 91% are from Caborca and<br />

9% do not originate in Caborca.<br />

It is hoped that this research is another step towards the creation of anthropometric letters<br />

of the Mexican population, as currently there are very few records are.<br />

At the end of the investigation we can see the importance of the study of ergonomics<br />

and especially one of its branches which is the anthropometry, which is responsible for examining<br />

each of the different measures that make up the human body. Knowing these measures can be<br />

designed with a higher degree of reliability workstations, tools and equipment, safety equipment,<br />

clothing, etc. so we can give each user a more convenient and comfortable life.<br />

The recommendations can be made once this investigation is that it would be very<br />

interesting and important to continue to obtain anthropometric records of the total Mexican<br />

population, in order to develop equipment, workstations, tools and equipment as well as<br />

everything that needs dimensions of people, especially for the Mexican people and not have to<br />

take the actions of other countries and make adjustments later.<br />

5. BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

Annis 1996 James F. Annis. Aging effects on anthropometric dimensions important to workplace design.<br />

Annis Consulting, 503 Xenia Avenue, Yellow Springs, OH 45387, USA. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics<br />

18 (1996) 381 – 388.<br />

Baustista 2006 Ruben Bautista Balderas. Tablas antropométricas de adultos con enanismo de entre 18 a 45 años de<br />

edad para el diseño de mobiliario. Encuentro Universitario de Ergonomía. México, D.F., México 10 y 11 de Noviembre<br />

de 2006. Consultado en Diciembre del 2006. http://www.semac.org.mx/congreso/Encuentro5-4.pdf.<br />

Cavassa 2004 César Ramírez Cavassa. Ergonomía y Productividad. Editorial LIMUSA. ISBN 968-18-3797-5.<br />

Mexico, D.F. 2004.<br />

De la Vega 2004 Enrique de la Vega. La investigación de la Ergonomia en Mexico. VI CONGRESO<br />

INTERNACIONAL <strong>DE</strong> <strong>ERGONOMÍA</strong>. Guanajuato, Guanajuato, México 26 al 29 de Mayo de 2004. Consultado en<br />

Diciembre del 2006 http://www.semac.org.mx/congreso/6-6.pdf.<br />

Gosseens 1998 R.H.M. Goossens, C.J. Snijders, y T. Fransen. Biomechanical analysis of the dimensions of pilot<br />

seats in civil aircraft. Department of Product and Systems Ergonomics, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft<br />

University of Technology, Jawalaan 9, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands. Department of Biomedical Physics and<br />

Technology, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.<br />

Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 9-14. 1998.<br />

Jung 2005 Hwa S.Jung. A prototype of an adjustable table and an adjustable chair for schools.<br />

Department of Industrial Engineering, Dongshin University, 252 Daehodong, Naju, Chonnam 520-714, Republic of<br />

Korea. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 955–969.<br />

Konz 1999: Stephan Konz. Diseño de sistemas de trabajo. Editorial Limusa. 1999. ISBN 968-18-1653-6.<br />

Maldonado 2003 Araceli Maldonado, Gilberto Mota, Juan Carlos Cano, Humberto Ponce y Sergio Chávez.<br />

Rediseño de estaciones de trabajo “secado de arcilla”. V CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL <strong>DE</strong> <strong>ERGONOMÍA</strong>. Ciudad<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 33


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Juárez, Chihuahua, México. Mayo 2003. Consultado en Diciembre del 2006 http://www.semac.org.mx/congreso/5-<br />

12.pdf.<br />

Martínez 2000 Guillermo Martínez de la Teja. DISEÑO ERGONÓMICO PARA ESTACIONES <strong>DE</strong> TRABAJO CON<br />

COMPUTADORAS. II CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL <strong>DE</strong> <strong>ERGONOMÍA</strong>. Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México. Mayo<br />

2000. Consultado en Diciembre del 2006 http://www.semac.org.mx/congreso/2-4.pdf.<br />

Mohammad 2005: Yunis A.A. Mohammad. Anthropometric characteristics of the hand based on laterality and<br />

sex among Jordanian. Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha. Elsevier.<br />

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 747–754<br />

NASA 1978: NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), 1978. Anthropology Research Project 1978<br />

Anthropometric Source Book, Vol. I: Anthropometry for Designers, NASA Reference Publication 1024' Webb<br />

Associates (Ed.). National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Office,<br />

Houston, Texas, USA.<br />

Niebel 2001: Benjamín Niebel y Andris Freivalds. Ingeniería Industrial. Métodos, estándares y diseño de trabajo.<br />

Editorial Alfaomega. 2001. ISBN970-15-0597-2.<br />

Park, Kim 1997: Se Jin Park, Soo Chan Park, Jin Ho Kim, Chae-Bogk Kim. Biomechanical parameters on<br />

body segments of Korean adults. Ergonomics Research Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science.<br />

Department of Technology Education, Korea National University of Education. Elsevier. International Journal of<br />

Industrial Ergonomics 23 (1999) 23-31.<br />

Panagiotopoulou 2003 Georgia Panagiotopoulou, Kosmas Christoulas, Anthoula Papanckolaou, Konstantinos<br />

Mandroukas. Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school. Ergophysiology<br />

Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki<br />

62100, Greece. Applied Ergonomics 35 (2004) 121–128. 2004.<br />

Reeder 2003: Kevin Reeder. Addressing Anthropometrics through dimensional figure drawing. The Technology<br />

Teacher 63 no3 14-16 N 2003.<br />

Sánchez 2002 David Sánchez Monroy. Implantación de un proceso ergonómico para la industria para control de<br />

lesiones musculoesqueleticas. IV CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL <strong>DE</strong> <strong>ERGONOMÍA</strong>. Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua,<br />

México. Mayo 2002. Consultado en Diciembre del 2006 . http://www.semac.org.mx/congreso/4-5.pdf.<br />

Secretaria 2002: Secretaria de Salud. Manual de Procedimientos: Toma de Medidas Clínicas y<br />

Antropométricas En el Adulto y Adulto Mayor. Subsecretaría de Prevención y Protección de la Salud. Centro<br />

Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica Programa de Salud del Adulto y el Anciano. México 2002.<br />

Serrano 2004: Carlos Serrano Sánchez. La antropometría de Daniel Vergara Lope. Valorar con parámetros propios.<br />

Gaceta Médica Mexicana Vol. 140 No. 4, 2004.Academia Nacional de Medicina de México, A.C.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 34


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Biomechanical model to estimate recovery time on highly repetitive work in<br />

maquila operations<br />

Fco. Octavio López Millán 1 , Enrique Javier de la Vega Bustillos 1 ,<br />

Manuel Arnoldo Rodríguez Medina 2 , Armando Ayala Corona 3<br />

1 Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial.<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Hermosillo. Ave. Tecnológico S.N.<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mx. 83170<br />

Author’s e-mail: lopezoctavio@yahoo.com.mx<br />

2 Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial.<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Cd. Juárez. Ave. Tecnológico 1340<br />

Cd. JuárezChih, Sonora, Mx. 32500<br />

3 Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas<br />

Universidad del Valle de México. Blvd. Enrique Mazón No. 617.<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mx. 83165<br />

Resumen: El propósito de este trabajo es desarrollar un modelo biomecánico que permita hacer<br />

estimaciones de los tiempos de recuperación, basado en un número importante de variables<br />

obtenidas de condiciones de trabajo reales, donde, el mismo grupo de músculos está expuestoal<br />

trabajo repetitivo y a bajos esfuerzos. Las variables independientes están relacionadas con las<br />

características de los trabajadores y del trabajo. Las variables de respuesta son el tiempo de<br />

recuperación y la fatiga percibida. Los datos se obtuvieron de industrias maquiladoras del<br />

noroeste de México.<br />

Palabras clave: Modelo biomecánico, trabajo repetitivo, maquiladora<br />

Abstract: The purpose of this research is development a biomechanical model allowing<br />

estimating the recovery time based on an important number of variables, obtained from real work<br />

conditions, where the same muscle group is exposed to repetitive work and low efforts.<br />

Independent variables are related to personal characteristics and work characteristics. Response<br />

variable are recovery time and perceived fatigue. Data were obtained from workers and work<br />

stations from Maquila industries in northwest Mexico. The research is based on considerations<br />

about anthropometrics from a Mexican population, genre and hour of work.<br />

Keywords: Biomechanical modeling, repetitive work, cumulative effect of force, maquila<br />

1. Introduction.<br />

Assessment of human work has been a fundamental element on the ergonomics evolution,<br />

actually there is a wide variety of methods for the ergonomics assessment of work stations,<br />

however, at the moment that the ergonomist needs a tool, sometimes there is the constraint which<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 35


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

results usually shows the most risky condition, in terms of a work muscle skeletal disorder, it<br />

means that shows a value qualifying a single moment of work, while the work remains continuous<br />

along the journey.<br />

The work doing by the hands has been a very important factor on manufacturing industries,<br />

especially on development countries, but the human being and its physical characteristics at<br />

service of material transformation trough industrial process it is not an endless power supply,<br />

while time pass away, physical performance could be affected and modified.<br />

As a result of frequent exposure to work there is a risk of musculoskeletal injuries, Bernard et al<br />

(1997) refers that it´s “were recognized as having occupational etiologic factors as early as the<br />

beginning of the 18th century. However, it was not until the 1970s that occupational factors were<br />

examined using epidemiologic methods, and the work-relatedness of these conditions began<br />

appearing regularly in the international scientific literature. Since then the literature has increased<br />

dramatically; more than six thousand scientific articles addressing ergonomics in the workplace<br />

have been published. Yet, the relationship between MSDs and work-related factors remains the<br />

subject of considerable debate.”<br />

Continuous and repetitive tasks could lead to disorders on the soft tissues on joints. The tissues<br />

that frequently get injured as a result of exposure to occupational biomechanical hazards are<br />

ligaments, tendons and muscles. Other structures affected less frequently are cartilage and<br />

bones. All biological tissues are visco-elastic; hence, their mechanical properties are time- and<br />

strain rate-dependent. The tissue visco-elastic property determines the duration required for<br />

complete mechanical recovery, Kumar (2001).<br />

Disorders on the soft tissues are well known as cumulative trauma disorders (CTD´s), it´s<br />

basically a combination of factors or occupational activities that leads to these injuries, Keyserling<br />

et al (1993) includes repetitive motions, forceful exertions, and awkward postures. Bernard et al<br />

(1997) presents an evaluation and summary of the epidemiologic evidence focuses on disorders<br />

affecting the neck and the upper extremity; including tension neck syndrome, shoulder tendinitis,<br />

epicondylitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and hand-arm vibration syndrome, which have been the<br />

most extensivelystudied in the epidemiologic literature. Combination of these risk factors on the<br />

same activities increases the possibility of injuries in wrist and shoulder while neck disorders are<br />

related to awkward posture, for instance.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 36


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

CTD´s cost days and money so there are relevant, the BLS (2005) reports 1,234,700 workdays<br />

lost in USA. In the same year there were 270,890 reported injuries in low back. Bernard et al<br />

(1997) reports 32% of injuries were due to excessive efforts or repetitive tasks. In specific, 65% of<br />

cases were caused by effort to lifts objects or materials, affecting low back, 52% were caused by<br />

pushing or pulling. But it´s not only low back injuries, the report includes 47,681 shoulder injuries<br />

and 92,576 injuries associated to repetitive movements, 55% of that affected wrist.<br />

Muggleton et al (1999) refers to injuries related to work as typical injuries on XX century and<br />

consider it´s as the bigger of problems on occupational wealth. On United Kingdom, upper limb<br />

musculoskeletal disorders are the most frequent just below low back pain injuries. CTD external<br />

causes says, are related with the pressure on industry business for increasing productivity. In<br />

consequence, costs for; medical attention, incapacities days, lost workdays, employs rotation,<br />

absenteeism costs, have been increased too.<br />

Viikari-Juntura (1997), notes the need of programs and strategies to prevent occupational<br />

injurieswhile lost days increases on industrial countries, as well as development countries. The<br />

European Union is working on rules and laws about occupational injuries, focusing in harmonizing<br />

it´s legislation.<br />

In México, according to the IMSS (Mexican Institute for the Social Safety) in 2006 were reported<br />

138,700 work injuries in hand-wrist and low back area. The Mexican legislation and rules doesn´t<br />

make any difference between accident and occupational injuries.<br />

In northern México, in Border States the data are the follows:<br />

Table 1. Work related injuries in Nothern Mexico..<br />

State Injuries Hand-wrist Low back<br />

Nuevo León 29054 10425 3264<br />

Baja California 16308 6025 2041<br />

Sonora 12074 3678 2127<br />

Tamaulipas 11823 3691 1734<br />

Chihuahua 1762 453 239<br />

Coahuila 1425 358 149<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 37


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

1.1 Occupational injuries. The risk factors are related with injuries in joints and soft tissues.<br />

There are several terms to name it, Grieco et al (1998) defines as “Work Musculoskeletal<br />

Disorders; WMSD”, but frequently is used as a synonymous “Cumulative Trauma Disorders<br />

(CTD´s)” or “Repetitive Strain Injuries (RSI)”. Grieco et al (1998) associate as characteristics of<br />

these injuries the follows: Its origin is due to several factors (occupational and personal), it take<br />

long time to develop the disorder, recovery are used to be slow and probably never at 100%,<br />

frequently involves groups of tendons and muscles and that one’s caused by nerves pressed are<br />

de lesser frequents but the painful and costly.<br />

1.2 Ergonomic Risk Factors. To understand the musculoskeletal disorders problem, is required<br />

to identify the risk factors associated to these kinds of injuries. There is a wide literature about it<br />

and its don´t surprise, the problem has been studied for years and many point of views and results<br />

of research converge on the causes or risk factors, Colombini (1998) recognize mainly four risk<br />

factors; repetitive movements (frequency), force applied to the task, awkward postures and lack of<br />

enough recovery time on each work cycle. Muggleton (1999) includes vibration as a risk factor for<br />

the hand-wrist. McAtamney y Corlet (1973) refers to the risk factors as external factors, including<br />

a consideration for static work load on muscles. Furthermore, highly repetitive work may directly<br />

damage tendons through repeated stretching and elongation, as well as increase the likelihood of<br />

fatigue and decrease the opportunity for tissues to recover Keyserlin et al (1993).<br />

The focus of this project is on the repetitive effect on recovery time based on manufacturing<br />

activities at high level of repetition which is the most of the tasks that operators perform on<br />

maquila industries in basically all Northern of México.<br />

Is well known the wide ergonomics assessment techniques available in present, Liand Buckle<br />

(1999) mentioned that exposure to risks for potential work-related musculoskeletal injuries has<br />

been assessed using a variety of methods, including pen and paper based observation methods,<br />

videotaping and computer-aided analysis, direct or instrumental techniques, and various<br />

approaches to self-report assessment.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 38


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The purpose of this research is develop a model to describe the effect of repetitive task and<br />

predict the recovery time for continuous task and includes subjective factors as perceived fatigue,<br />

this last factor in order to explain the presence of tape on finger tips or wrist protections.<br />

2. Method.<br />

It is very relevant to the success of this project obtain the data from real conditions, that means<br />

going to the assembly production lines on maquilas and get the data. The first step consists<br />

tochoose the work stations, video recorder it, get data: anthropometric and operational and<br />

perceived fatigue.<br />

We appreciate the support from the maquila, they let Us to see the process, mostly of it is<br />

confidential, for the first step 23 workstations were analyzed, the variables included are; height,<br />

weight, angle on shoulder (RH) to perform a sustained effort and the time on that posture.<br />

Additionally, a perceived fatigue questionnaire was ask to answer for, it qualifies from 0 to 3<br />

presences of any symptoms like numbness, pain or stiffness, were 0 means no symptom at the<br />

end of the work shift, 1 means seldom times remember any symptom, 2 is related to occasionally<br />

feels any symptom and 3 are related to frequent symptoms. For each workstation were<br />

considered two activities involving shoulder posture.<br />

On second step data were analyzed using 3D SSPP© and Rohmert formula to estimate<br />

recuperation time for each operator. The third step involves the linear regression analysis and the<br />

Bayesian approach to optimize the time recuperation model. WinBUGS is the tool for Bayesian.<br />

3. Results<br />

All collected data are at the end, summarizing, 46 data were analyzed for the 23 operators; it’s<br />

due to the use of two different exertion times. On each job the angle on shoulder was measured<br />

and every workstation was modeled using the 3D SSPP© software to obtain the moment on the<br />

shoulder. Moment and sustained effort time on seconds were used to introduce as data to<br />

Rohmert formula, the result is the recovery time for the shoulder, expressed on seconds on<br />

different posture, for every 60 seconds of work.<br />

3.1 Statistical analysis. The analysis was made using SPSS© software. In the beginning, the<br />

moment on shoulder was considered as a variable, it’s give an excellent correlation r = .918 with<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 39


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

an adjust r = .819 which means a high explanation to the variability of the data, but moment on the<br />

practice is not an easy data to calculate, that´s why we optioned a less efficient model but easy to<br />

use and understand.<br />

Subtracting the moment the model summary is:<br />

The linear regression model obtained is shown as follows:<br />

Coefficients a<br />

Model<br />

UnstandardizedCoefficients<br />

B Std. Error Beta<br />

StandardizedCo<br />

efficients<br />

t Sig.<br />

1 (Constant) -28.025 29.563 -.948 .348<br />

Estatura .220 19.919 .001 .011 .991<br />

Peso -.115 .079 -.133 -1.454 .153<br />

Angulo .466 .082 .436 5.684 .000<br />

FatPer 1.068 1.097 .077 .974 .335<br />

TESF 1.208 .128 .716 9.451 .000<br />

a. Dependent Variable: TREC<br />

Expressed on the mathematical form, the model is:<br />

Recovery Time= -28.025 + .22*Height - .115*Weight + .466*Angle + 1.068*Perceived Fatigue<br />

+ 1.208*Sustained effort time<br />

3.2 Bayesian Analysis.The Bayesian analysis is included in order to optimize the linear<br />

regression model coefficients, on this approach; coefficients leave the parameter condition in the<br />

model becoming a variable on the model. WinBUGS is a tool developed to perform Bayesian,<br />

based on Markov Chain and Monte Carlo methods the software allows simulate a great number of<br />

repetitions.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 40


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

There are some additional considerations to made; variables fit a normal distribution. On every<br />

variable the software run more than 10,000 iterations.<br />

The linear regression model has change as follows:<br />

Recovery Time= -44.13+ 5.22*Height -0.1227*Weight + 0.5464*Angle -0.02*Perceived Fatigue<br />

+ 1.534*Sustained effort time<br />

The resulting model is based on the original linear regression model but coefficients become<br />

variables with its own statistical distribution.<br />

Bayesian analysis is a very useful tool when experiments are limited and especially when the data<br />

come from human characteristics and a cross functional approach are used on the research.<br />

4. Discussion<br />

The linear regression model optimized can now be used to estimate recovery times on repetitive<br />

operations but is necessary draw some limitations; to verify the accuracy of the model it was run<br />

with different exertion times, the model result on negative values for recovery time when the<br />

exertion timeis below 10 seconds and for exertion times higher than 30 seconds results are<br />

considerably greater that could made efficient on process get on low values, so it has and impact<br />

on costs.<br />

In test stage, when exertion times are below 10 seconds, recovery time calculated by Rohmert<br />

formula result on values around 2 seconds or lower, that could be interpreted like low risk<br />

operations due to repetitiveness and classifieds on green codes. On the other hand exertion time<br />

over 30 seconds results on high repetition rates having an effect on sustain effort and<br />

consequently on a high risk for an occurrence of occupational injuries.<br />

The application of the model is not complicated, the input variables are the predictors variables;<br />

the height is expressed on meters, the weight is in kilograms, the angle on the shoulder can be<br />

measured using a goniometer, perceived fatigue could be get asking to the operators for the<br />

presence of any symptom described before and exertion time can be measured by a chronometer<br />

or analyzing the video time counter. Once the data are collected, introduce it in the formula and<br />

the results are expressed on how many seconds per every 60 seconds cycle are needed to<br />

recover a group of muscles from fatigue due to the job.<br />

The application of the model could be extensive on a future to other groups of muscles, for<br />

instance low back muscles or wrist articulation, increasing the focus of the research, increasing<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 41


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

the analysis of different jobs when those are repetitive. At the end the final purpose is bringing a<br />

little more on safety on daily performance allowing to people return home with a little bit more<br />

energy to share with the family.<br />

References<br />

Bernard, B. (1997). “Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors; A Critical Review of<br />

Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper<br />

Extremity, and Low Back”.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for<br />

Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).<br />

Bureau of Labor Statistics (2007).“Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program”.www.bls.gov.<br />

Colombini, D. (1998) 'An observational method for classifying exposure to repetitive movements<br />

of the upper limbs', Ergonomics, 41:9, 1261 – 1289.<br />

Grieco, A. (1998). “Application of the concise exposure index (OCRA) to tasks involving repetitive<br />

movements of the upper limbs in a variety of manufacturing industries: preliminary validations”,<br />

Ergonomics, 41:9, 1347 - 1356<br />

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, (2006). “Información estadística en salud; accidentes de<br />

trabajo (1). www.imss.gob.mx<br />

Keyserling, W. M., Stetson, D. S., Silverstein, B. A. and Brouwer, M. L. (1993) “A checklist for<br />

evaluating ergonomic risk factors associated with upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders”,<br />

Ergonomics, 36:7, 807 – 831.<br />

Kumar, Shrawan (2001) 'Theories of musculoskeletal injury causation', Ergonomics, 44:1, 17 –<br />

47<br />

Li G., Buckle P. (1999).“ Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related<br />

musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods”. Ergonomics, 42; 5, 674 – 695.<br />

McAtamney, L. Corlet, N., (1973).“RULA; A survey method for the investigation of work-related<br />

upper limb disorders”. Applied Ergonomics; 24(2), 91-99.<br />

Muggleton, J. M., Allen, R. and Chappell, P. H.,(1999.) “Hand and arm injuries associated with<br />

repetitive manual work in industry: a review of disorders, risk factors and preventive measures”,<br />

Ergonomics, 42:5, 714 – 739.<br />

Rohmert Walter (1973). “Problems in determining rest allowances”. Applied Ergonomics, 4.2 91-<br />

95.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 42


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Viikari-Juntura, Eira R. A. (1997) 'The scientific basis for making guidelines and standards to<br />

prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders', Ergonomics, 40:10, 1097 – 1117<br />

DATA<br />

Height Weight<br />

Shoulder<br />

Angle<br />

Perceived<br />

Fatigue<br />

T exer T rec<br />

1.62 64 60 3 15 9.84<br />

1.61 59 45 2 14 5.23<br />

1.53 61 45 0 12 3.39<br />

1.56 60 40 1 18 7.72<br />

1.61 55 40 2 17 6.53<br />

1.61 65 45 3 10 2.73<br />

1.58 61 40 3 15 5.3<br />

1.54 58 35 2 20 7.19<br />

1.60 66 55 3 15 9.51<br />

1.65 58 35 3 19 8.35<br />

1.64 67 65 2 13 8.39<br />

1.56 57 55 3 16 8.01<br />

1.58 56 60 3 21 17.25<br />

1.62 65 40 2 18 9.99<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 43


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

1.61 67 46 2 15 1.33<br />

1.72 86 40 2 16 2.54<br />

1.62 74 40 2 14 0.91<br />

1.58 81 55 3 19 12.41<br />

1.58 54 30 3 21 6.82<br />

1.63 56 50 2 25 24.98<br />

1.62 64 60 3 21 22.05<br />

1.61 59 45 2 26 23.11<br />

1.53 61 45 0 24 17.88<br />

1.56 60 40 1 29 24.27<br />

1.61 55 40 2 27 19.82<br />

1.56 52 30 2 26 9.62<br />

1.61 65 45 3 24 35.11<br />

1.58 61 40 3 26 19.83<br />

1.54 58 35 2 29 17.54<br />

1.60 66 55 3 23 26.52<br />

1.60 53 35 2 22 9.04<br />

1.55 50 40 2 23 9.95<br />

1.65 58 35 3 27 19.4<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 44


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

1.64 67 65 2 21 26.51<br />

1.56 57 55 3 29 33.39<br />

1.58 56 60 3 25 26.22<br />

1.62 65 40 2 28 28.84<br />

1.68 102 45 3 22 14.33<br />

1.67 77 30 3 24 2.05<br />

1.72 86 40 2 28 9.75<br />

1.52 75 39 3 22 0.86<br />

1.62 74 40 2 21 2.42<br />

1.58 81 55 3 30 37.15<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 45


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

VERIFICATION OF MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE WEIGHT OF LIFT, TABULATED IN<br />

LIBERTY MUTUAL TABLES, IN WOMEN OF CABORCA<br />

Jesús Rodolfo Guzmán Hernández 1 , Joaquín Vásquez Quiroga 1 ,<br />

Enrique Javier De La Vega Bustillos 2<br />

1 Grupo disciplinar de Ergonomía, Programa de Ingeniería Industrial,<br />

Universidad de Sonora Unidad Regional Norte, campus Caborca.<br />

Caborca, Sonora, México,<br />

rguzman@caborca.uson.mx, jovaqui@caborca.uson.mx<br />

2Maestría en Sistemas Industriales<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Hermosillo<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora, México<br />

en_vega@ith.mx<br />

RESUMEN: Esta investigación se realizo con la intención de verificar la aplicación de los datos,<br />

de peso máximo de levantamiento (MLW), tabulados en las Tablas Liberty mutual, en la<br />

población laboral femenina de Caborca, Sonora, México. El experimento se limito a tareas de<br />

levantamiento vertical, frecuencia de uno por minuto, cajas de 34 cm de ancho (distancia desde el<br />

cuerpo), distancia de movimiento 51 cm, en tres niveles de levantamiento, bajo, que corresponde<br />

a levantamientos entre el suelo y la altura de nudillos, medio, de altura de nudillos a altura de<br />

hombros y alto, de altura de hombros a brazo extendido. Ésta fue realizada con alumnas<br />

estudiantes del programa de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas adoptando el supuesto de que<br />

ellas pudieran estar formando parte de la fuerza laboral de las empresas establecidas en la<br />

región. Como resultado de este experimento se observo que los peso máximos tabulados en la<br />

Tabla Liberty Mutual para tareas similares a las de este experimento, son cuantitativamente<br />

mayores y existe evidencia estadística suficiente para rechazar que se pueden aplicar a la<br />

población laboral bajo estudio.<br />

Palabra clave: levantamiento de carga mujeres, tareas de levantamiento mujeres, máxima<br />

peso aceptable<br />

ABSTACT: The intention of this investigation was verify the application of maximum lifting weight<br />

data tabulated in the Liberty Mutual Tables (MLW), on the female labor population of Caborca,<br />

Sonora, Mexico. The experiment was limited to vertical lifting tasks, frequency of one per minute,<br />

boxes of 34 cm of wide (distance since the body), distance of movement 51 cm, in three levels of<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 46


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

lifting, low, that corresponds to lifting among the floor and the height of knuckles, medium, of<br />

height of knuckles to height of shoulders and high, of height of shoulders to arm extended. This<br />

investigation was done with 14 students, female gender, of the program Industrial and Systems<br />

Engineering, with the assumption that they could be part of the workforce of firms established in<br />

the region. As a result of this experiment was observed that the information of maximum<br />

acceptable weight tabulated in liberty mutual tables for similar tasks this experiment are<br />

quantitatively greater and there is sufficient statistical evidence to reject that we can apply it to<br />

working population under study.<br />

Keyword: women lifting weight, women lifting tasks, maximum acceptable weight<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Webster et al (1994) suggest that low back pain, associated with manual handling of loads,<br />

has been recognized as a major problem worldwide is the most costly injury in the industrial world.<br />

De la Vega (2006), citing The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 1991,<br />

indicates the factors that directly influence the risk of lower back injuries are the weight and<br />

dimensions of the object, the distance is raised, lowered, pulled or pushed, and the repetition rate,<br />

as well as indirect factors such as age and physical condition of the worker. The consequences of<br />

ignoring the weight limit on the repetitive handling of loads can result in decreased performance at<br />

work and presents a risk of back pain that can become a cumulative trauma disorder (CTD) Putz-<br />

Anderson (1994). There are some studies about amount of weight that an individual is capable of<br />

lifting and about task design of the handling manual of loads with minimal risk of injury considering<br />

their characteristics and physical abilities. The reports of these studies represent guides to the<br />

industry which requires manually moving loads repeatedly. Among the most widely used guides<br />

include the NIOSH equation and the Liberty Mutual tables. The first is a tool through which,<br />

considering 7 factors involved in a lifting task, calculate the recommended weight limit (LPR) and,<br />

once known, is calculated the Lifting index that he is the ratio between the load weight and the<br />

recommended weight limit. The values that can take this index may fall into three risk zones,<br />

namely: limited risk (lifting index


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

3), this type of task is unacceptable from an ergonomic standpoint and should be changed.<br />

Moreover, the Liberty Mutual Company has developed the Liberty Mutual tables or tables of<br />

Snook which are a collection of tables which sets the maximum acceptable weight for help to<br />

control the risk of injury in the lower back in activities of manual handling of loads. In particular for<br />

lifting load, use the frequency of the task, the distance of movement of the load, the height at<br />

which the movement is placed, the size of the object and its grips and the horizontal distance<br />

(distance from the body) like parameters. With these parameters, the maximum acceptable weight<br />

it is tabulated in 10, 25, 50, 75 and 90 percentiles for male and female peoples. These studies<br />

and the respective conclusions were generated from the experimental data obtained of developed<br />

workers populations countries and the findings and their recommendations they are apply in<br />

Mexico without considering that data were obtained without including the characteristics and<br />

physical abilities of the Mexican population.<br />

In the Mexican Republic from 1992 to 2002 the Mexican Social Security Institute reported<br />

cases of 191.639 spine injuries, including back pain, accounting for 4.7% of total workplace<br />

injuries. Likewise, there is 42.422 dorsopatias with total disability in the period reported, including<br />

low back pain associated with lifting loads, representing 18.98% of total disability (Review IMSS<br />

2004), which indicates the relevance of the lesions of the spine. From the above, born the need to<br />

conduct this study which seeks to identify injury risks in applying the criteria of acceptable loads in<br />

the female population in Caborca, Sonora, Mexico, on grounds that it may be a cause for lower<br />

back pain that result of the manual materials handling, a problem that is occurring more often in<br />

companies. This raises the question "The maximum acceptable weight, reported by the Liberty<br />

Mutual tables for women, applies to women workers of Caborca? About this question the present<br />

investigation was made and it focuses only on tasks of vertical lift in frequency of one per minute,<br />

boxes width 34 cm, (distance from the body), movements 51 cm distance and three levels lifting:<br />

low , corresponding to uprisings between the ground and knuckle height, medium level, from<br />

height to knuckle to shoulder height and from shoulder height to arm's length.<br />

2. OBJETIVE<br />

The objective of this study is to identify risks in applying the criteria of maximum acceptable<br />

charges Liberty Mutual tabulated in Tables in the female working population Caborca, Sonora,<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 48


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Mexico, because it can be one of the causes of lower back pain , resulting from manual material<br />

handling, is a problem that is occurring more often in business. This led to pose the question "The<br />

maximum acceptable weight women, the tables set by Liberty Mutual, is applicable to workers in<br />

Caborca?<br />

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Details of the experiment, from where the Liberty Mutual Tables were made, it is found in the<br />

publications of Ciriello et al 1983, 1990 and 1991. The experiment was conducted using<br />

psychophysical approach. This approach requires that the subject is motivated by an incentive,<br />

and He,based on the perceived sensations, select the maximum load that it considers may sustain<br />

for a working day of 8 hr. According to Shoaf (1997), the major hypothesis of the psychophysical<br />

approach is that: at a given time, adjusted to 40 minutes, a person is able to predict the maximum<br />

weight or force that could be manipulated during a period of 8 hr; Mital (1983) states, people can<br />

estimate the amount of weight that can lift comfortably in 8 hr, based on experiencing fatigue in 25<br />

min and, hopefully, the weight selected by the subject is the same whether the person continues<br />

lifting it for 8 hr; Additionally, he states: there is no literature evidence to validate this claim.<br />

Under these criteria, basically, the subject is given control of the weight of the load, the participant<br />

monitors their own sensations of fatigue and adjusts the weight which he believes could bear. All<br />

other variables such as task frequency, load weight, distance of movement, etc.. are controlled by<br />

the experimenter. The participants in this experiment were 14 young female between 19 and 22<br />

years, they were university-level students they could be part of the workforce in the Caborca<br />

region. All signed in writing that they were free of lower back injury and had no cardiovascular<br />

disease. They used casual clothing and tennis shoes, jeans and loose shirts.<br />

To all participant in the experiment and for verify that the heights and distances of<br />

movement of loads in lifting tasks was be according to the experiment of Snook, were taken the<br />

anthropometric measures of weight, height, knuckle height, acromial height and extended arm<br />

height. Given the limited experience of the participants in manual handling of loads were given a<br />

belt to help keep your lower back straight. The participants were given training equal to the<br />

training done it in Ciriello et al (1983) experiment, to familiarize them with the activities to<br />

performed and gain experience in adjusting the load, increase or decrease according to their own<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 49


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

perceptions, they doing efforts themselves but without reaching a state of extreme tiredness,<br />

weakness, overheating or running out of breath, this, doing movements of vertically lifting , at a<br />

distance of 51 cm, with bending the knees and keeping your back straight, no turns or twists,<br />

without pull or push the load. For four consecutive days of tasks were performed lifting low (floor<br />

knuckle hight), increasing gradually the time. During first and second day were made a task for 10<br />

min with light load and heavy load respectively, the third day two tasks of 10 minutes each with<br />

light and heavy load respectively, without resting, the fourth day two tasks of 15 minutes with light<br />

load and heavy load respectively, without resting. The fifth, sixth and seventh days were for do the<br />

data collection. The daily tasks were made with duration of 40 minutes divided into two periods of<br />

20 minutes each one, without rest between periods, in the first period it gave them a heavy load<br />

and in the second light load, all randomly selected.<br />

Each day were made only the task for each level indicated for in the lifting Liberty Mutual<br />

tables, namely between floor level and knuckle height ( lifting low), between knuckle height and<br />

acromial height (lifting medium) and between airmail height and arm extended length (lifting<br />

height). For the experiment were used rigid polypropylene boxes with length of 55 cm (distance<br />

between hands), 34 cm wide (distance from the body) and 17 cm in height. The handgrips were<br />

located at half of the distance from the body and 15 cm from the floor of the box. The box<br />

contained a false bottom in which was placed a burden whose weight was randomly selected as in<br />

the experiment of Ciriello and Snook (1990). This hidden weight was not known by the participant<br />

in an attempt to minimize the visual effect. The load management was welding rods and it was<br />

used a balance T31P Ohaus, a decimal minute chronometer, a bell and shelves height-adjustable.<br />

For each level of uprising were select, at random, 14 heavy load values, between 32 and 45 kg,<br />

then was decreased in 3 kg each, which corresponds to the box weight, and the lid of the double<br />

bottom, the resulting value were divides random, to place the burden in the hidden compartment<br />

and the visible, subsequently the same procedure was performed for 14 light loads between 2 and<br />

18 kg, Snook (1990). These two procedures were repeated for each of the three levels of lifting<br />

the experiment. In the collection of field data were given in the first period a heavy load and the<br />

second period a light load., Participants adjusted the load in each period, they decreased or<br />

increased it according to their own perceptions until it represented the maximum they could lift in 8<br />

hr of task, if the load of the second period was between 15% of the first, the average of the two<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 50


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

loads is registered as the maximum acceptable load of the participant, otherwise the information is<br />

removed and a new test was performed.<br />

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

According to the working hypothesis raised in this investigation, if the maximum acceptable weight<br />

(MAW) of Table Liberty Mutual is applicable to the female population of the Caborca region, then<br />

the percentile distribution of the maximum load obtained from the participants, must statistically to<br />

exist a matching with the distribution of the liberty mutual table percentiles. Under this approach<br />

was performed the analysis for low level lifting. The results of the analysis are show in Table No 1<br />

Table 1 Analysis of field data, low level<br />

From the above table it is seen that for the 10th percentile there is not sufficient evidence to<br />

liberty mutual tabla data Hypotesis test<br />

MAW Null<br />

standard<br />

percentile (Kg) hypothesis statistical test desviation t α decisión<br />

90 11 P0 = 0.90 p= 0.79 0.08 -1.38 0.10 No rechazar Ho<br />

75 14 P0 = 0.75 p= 0.36 0.12 -3.25 0.00 Rechazar Ho<br />

50 16 P0 = 0.50 p= 0.21 0.13 -2.23 0.02 Rechazar Ho<br />

25 19 P0 = 0.25 p= 0.00 0.12 -2.08 0.03 Rechazar Ho<br />

10 22 P0 = 0.10 p= 0.00 0.08 -1.25 0.12 No rechazar Ho<br />

reject the null hypothesis. For 75, 50 and 25 percentile the significance levels of the test statistic<br />

permit reject the null hypothesis. The 10th percentile, has significance level to accept Ho but, is<br />

not feasible to accept the hypothesis that it applies the maximum load in the female working<br />

population Caborca because there is no real data to the percentiles 25 and 10, for what there is<br />

certainty to make the decision that both hypotheses may be rejected.<br />

For mid level lifting was performed an analysis similar to the previous data, the obtained<br />

information shown in Table No 2<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 51


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 2 Analysis of field data, medium level<br />

liberty mutual tabla<br />

data Hypotesis test<br />

MAW Null<br />

standard<br />

percentile (Kg) hypothesis statistical test desviation t α decisión<br />

90 10 P0 = 0.90 p= 0.64 0.08 -3.25 0.00 Rechazar Ho<br />

75 12 P0 = 0.75 p= 0.50 0.12 -2.08 0.03 Rechazar Ho<br />

50 14 P0 = 0.50 p= 0.07 0.13 -3.31 0.00 Rechazar Ho<br />

25 16 P0 = 0.25 p=0.00 0.12 -2.08 0.03 Rechazar Ho<br />

10 18 P0 = 0.10 p= 0.0 0.08 -1.25 0.12 No rechazar Ho<br />

In the analysis can be seen that, for the 90, 75, 50 and 25 percentiles, the levels of significance of<br />

the test statistic are able to reject the null hypothesis. The 10th percentile has a high significance<br />

level to not accept H0 but there is not feasible to accept it because, there is not real evidence.<br />

For high lifting, was performed the analysis data that it is show in table3.<br />

Table 3 Analysis of field data, hight level<br />

liberty mutual tabla Hypotesis test<br />

MAW Null<br />

standard<br />

percentile (Kg) hypothesis statistical test desviation t α decisión<br />

90 9 P0 = 0.90 p= 0.77 0.08 -1.63 0.06 No rechazar Ho<br />

75 11 P0 = 0.75 p= 0.31 0.12 -3.67 0.00 rechazar Ho<br />

50 12 P0 = 0.50 p= 0.08 0.14 -3.00 0.01 rechazar Ho<br />

25 14 P0 = 0.25 p= 0.00 0.12 -2.08 0.03 rechazar Ho<br />

10 15 P0 = 0.10 p= 0.00 0.08 -1.25 0.12 No rechazar Ho<br />

datos correspondientes a 13 participantes<br />

In this last analysis presents a situation similar to the results for lifting low, one can see that<br />

for the 90th percentile there is no sufficient evidence to reject that, at this level, we can apply the<br />

maximum weight indicated by the table, for the percentiles 75, 50 and 25 the level of significance<br />

of the test statistic is at able to reject the null hypothesis. For the 10th and 25th percentiles, same<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 52


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

that in previous analysis is not feasible to accept the hypothesis Ho because there is no real<br />

evidence.<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

With the results and analysis of the data above we can accept that, in general, there is not<br />

sufficient evidence to accept that the maximum weight recommended in Liberty Mutual Table for<br />

lifting in women, in vertical lifting for frequency of one per minute, boxes of 34 cm wide (distance<br />

from the body), movement distance of 51 cm, at the three levels of survey, can be applied to the<br />

female workforce of the Caborca region without running the risk of injury. Given this information<br />

we can conclude that, it is not appropriate to apply the recommendations in Table Liberty Mutual<br />

in the female working population in the Caborca region since it is possible that this population has<br />

a lower lifting capacity or possibly with a less dispersion in capacity lifting. As a result of this<br />

research we recommend that define the acceptable maximum weights in lifting burdens on women<br />

in different regions of our country since there are no recommendations in this regard and are a<br />

cause of interest public health<br />

6.REFERENCES<br />

Ciriello, VM and Snook, SH 1990., Ergonomy 1990, vol 33, no.3 ,187-200, "The effects of<br />

container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting<br />

for female industrial workers."<br />

Ciriello, VM and Snook, SH 1991, Ergonomy 1991, Vol 34, No 9,1194-1213, "The design of<br />

manual handing tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces".<br />

De La Vega Bustillos, Enrique 2005, "checklists, methods and mathematical models for ergonomic<br />

evaluation of work environments", Technological Institute of Hermosillo<br />

http://www.estrucplan.com.ar/articulos/verarticulo.asp?IDArticulo=982 visited in June 2009<br />

Mital, Anil (1983), Human Factors, 1983, 25 (5), 488-49, The Psychophysical approach in manual<br />

lifting, a verification study.<br />

National Institute for Occupational and healt (NIOSH), 1991, "Scientific support documentation for<br />

revised 1991 NIOSH lifting equation".<br />

Putz Anderson, V (1994) "Cumulative Trauma Disorders. A Manual for Musculoskeletal Diseases<br />

of the Upper Limbs. Taylor & Francis, London.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 53


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Snook, SH and Ciriello, VM 1983, Human Factors, 1983.25 (5), 473-483, "A study of size,<br />

distance, Height and Frequency Effects of manual handling tasks<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 54


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Force analysis in hands on highly repetitive work in maquila operations<br />

Fco. Octavio López Millán 1 , Enrique Javier de la Vega Bustillos 2 , MaríaJesúsTéllez Moroyoqui 1 ,<br />

LodevarPavlovichOviedo 2 , Bertha Leticia Ortiz Navar 3<br />

1 Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial.<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Hermosillo. Ave. Tecnológico S.N.<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mx. 83170<br />

Author’s e-mail: lopezoctavio@yahoo.com.mx<br />

2 División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación.<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Hermosillo. Ave. Tecnológico S.N.<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mx. 83170<br />

3 Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial.<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Nogales. Ave. Instituto Tecnológico #911.<br />

Nogales, Sonora, Mx. 84065<br />

Resumen: Esta investigación se enfoca a analizar la fuerza como una función de tiempo en datos<br />

obtenidos en condiciones reales, considerando trabajo altamente repetitivo, donde las manos y<br />

dedos están expuestos a trabajo repetitivo y bajos esfuerzos. Se utilizo el diseño genera de<br />

medidas repetidas para analizar el comportamiento de la fuerza para ambas manos y pulgares.<br />

La hora, el turno y el día de trabajo fueron considerados como factores. La fuerza fue medida de<br />

la sexta a la octava hora en un intervalo de una hora, mientras que la semana empezó el lunes;<br />

el monitoreo fue de una semana. Los datos fueron obtenidos de plantas maquiladoras de las<br />

ciudades de Hermosillo y Nogales Sonora.<br />

Palabras Calve: Fuerza en manos, fuerza en pulgares, trabajo repetitivo, efecto acumulado<br />

de la fuerza, maquila.<br />

Abstract: The focus of this research is analyze how force is going as a function of time in data<br />

obtained from real work conditions, considering highly repetitive work, where the hands and<br />

fingers are exposed to repetitive work and low efforts. The repetitive measurement general design<br />

was used to analyze force behavior for both hands and both thumbs. The hour on the shift and the<br />

day week are the factors. Force was measured from the sixth hour to the eight hour on one hour<br />

interval, while the week day starts on Monday; the monitor is for a week. Data were obtained on<br />

maquila plants in Hermosillo and Nogales Sonora.<br />

Keywords: Hands force, thumbs force, repetitive work, cumulative effect of force, maquila.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 55


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The work doing by the hands has been a very important factor on manufacturing industries,<br />

especially on development countries, but the human being and its physical characteristics at<br />

service of material transformation on industrial process it is not an endless power supply, while<br />

time passthrough the day, physical performance could be affected and modified.<br />

As a result of frequent exposure to work there is a risk of musculoskeletal injuries, Bernard et al<br />

(1997) refers that it´s “were recognized as having occupational etiologic factors as early as the<br />

beginning of the 18th century,however, it was not until the 1970s that occupational factors were<br />

examined using epidemiologic methods, and the work-relatedness of these conditions began<br />

appearing regularly in the international scientific literature. Since then the literature has increased<br />

dramatically; more than six thousand scientific articles addressing ergonomics in the workplace<br />

have been published. Yet, the relationship between MSDs and work-related factors remains the<br />

subject of considerable debate.”<br />

To understand the musculoskeletal disorders problem, is required to identify the risk factors<br />

associated to these kinds of injuries. There is a wide literature about it and its don´t surprise, the<br />

problem has been studied for years and many point of views and results of research converge on<br />

the causes or risk factors, Colombini (1998) recognize mainly four risk factors; repetitive<br />

movements (frequency), force applied to the task, awkward postures and lack of enough recovery<br />

time on each work cycle. Muggleton (1999) includes vibration as a risk factor for the hand-wrist.<br />

McAtamney y Corlet (1973) refers to the risk factors as external factors, including a consideration<br />

for static work load on muscles. Furthermore, highly repetitive work may directly damage tendons<br />

through repeated stretching and elongation, as well as increase the likelihood of fatigue and<br />

decrease the opportunity for tissues to recover Keyserlin et al (1993).<br />

This work is focused in finding the relationship between frequency and the force that people can<br />

exert as a function of time and some anthropometric characteristics, the approach is; on the latest<br />

hours of the shift work, force become to decrease significant, at least statistically and there is a<br />

relationship between force and anthropometrics.<br />

2. Method<br />

One objective was collect data in working conditions, so the “experiment” was planned as follows:<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 56


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

• Find a process with highly repetitive operations; it is more than 300 units per hour.<br />

• The job involves extensive use of the hands and the fingers.<br />

• The anthropometrics measurements are for the hands and some generals:<br />

o Length of the hand.<br />

o Width of the hand.<br />

o Height of the hand.<br />

o Width of the wrist<br />

o Height of the wrist<br />

o Height of the thumb<br />

o Width of the thumb<br />

o Height of the middle finger<br />

o Width of the middle finger<br />

• The force on handgrip and thumb grip is measure with a Jamar© hand dynamometer and<br />

finger dynamometer. Every day 3 measurements are made every half hour from the sixth<br />

hour for the handgrip and finger grip for each side of the hands.<br />

• All data is collected and analyzed on statistical software (SPSS©)<br />

• Multiple linear regression is the tool to analyze the relationship between force and<br />

anthropometrics.<br />

• The repetitive measurements general model is used to analyze the force within hours and<br />

within days.<br />

• The data are from maquilas on Hermosillo and Nogales, Sonora, Mex.<br />

3. Results<br />

Is relevant to mention, again, how important get data from working conditions is, there was about<br />

50 operators who they were asked for to participate with the measurements for anthropometrics<br />

and force exertions, we appreciate that very much as well the maquila support to achieve the<br />

purpose of the research. Once data were collected and organized on worksheets next step is<br />

proceed to statistical analysis.<br />

The first part is finding the relationship between anthropometrics and force for each side on the<br />

hands, before the linear regression analysis, principal components was run to discriminate and<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 57


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

group variables, the next tables show it:The first iteration includes all variables resulting on seven<br />

groups and .717 acceptable KMO value, results are:<br />

Table 1. Total variance explained<br />

.<br />

The first rotated component matrix shows how variables are grouped in the seven groups:<br />

Table 2 Rotated Component Matrix<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 58


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

After several iterations, the target is find two groups; this final rotated matrix is next:<br />

Table 3 Final Rotated Component Matrix<br />

As values are shown on the table 4.3 the groups are formed with the higher coefficients; a first<br />

group is for; gender, height, weight and hand force. The second group are formed with; hand<br />

length, hand width, thumb width, thumb length and wrist width.<br />

Once groups are formed the next is linear regression analysis, the purpose here is just to found<br />

some kind of statistical relationship between variables or personal and force, next table shows the<br />

better relationship:<br />

Table 4 Linear Regression Model<br />

Predictor variables were; height, weight, thumb width, wrist width and hand length. Response<br />

variable is hand force.<br />

Linear regression shows a relationship between variables and force, that in general conditions, so<br />

next step is the analysis of force as a function of time.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 59


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Force behavior was tested using repetitive measurements general model for each hand.<br />

Additionally some extra test was run in order to probe variances and differences between hours<br />

and days. Results are in next tables. The first test is for right hand and the hour of the shift, table 5<br />

shows descriptive and table 6 shows Mauchy´s sphericity test.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

Table 5.Descriptive statistics for right hand and hour<br />

Table 6.Mauchy´ssphericity test<br />

Significance on Mauchy´s test is 0.00 that means differences between variances are not equals,<br />

so is necessary run the Bonferronistest for multiple comparisons, this test shows in what hour are<br />

a difference in average exerted force on right hand, table 7 shows it.<br />

Same proceed is for the left hand and next tables shows results for descriptive statistics,<br />

significance on Mauchy´s test is 0.00 that means differences between variances are not equals,<br />

so is necessary again run the Bonferronis test for multiple comparisons, this test shows in what<br />

hour are a difference in average exerted force on left hand.<br />

All statistical tests are for a 95% confidence level.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 60


.<br />

.<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 7.Bonferroni´s pair comparisons for right hand<br />

Table 8.Descriptive for left hand<br />

Table 9.Mauchy´s test for left hand.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 61


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 10.Bonferroni´s pair comparison for left hand.<br />

Same proceed is for both hands but the analysis is now within week days. Next tables shows<br />

results for descriptive statistics, significance on Mauchy´s test is 0.00 that means differences<br />

between variances are not equals, so is necessary again run the Bonferronis test for multiple<br />

comparisons, this test shows in what day are a difference in average exerted force the hand.<br />

.<br />

Right hand force descriptive are:<br />

Table 11.Mauchy´s test for day and right hand<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 62


.<br />

Table 12.Descriptive statistics for right hand and day.<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 13.Bonferroni´s comparison pair test<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 63


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 14.Mauchy´s test for day and left hand<br />

Table 15. Descriptive statistics for left hand and day<br />

Table 15.Bonferroni´s comparison pair test for left hand and day.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 64


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

4. Discussion<br />

In an implicit form the purpose of this research was to show how force depend on anthropometric<br />

characteristics and how force is related with fatigue with a clear decrease pattern on force<br />

behavior trough hours and days.<br />

The first part tested by principal components and linear regression is positive; a statistical<br />

relationship does exist between hand and finger anthropometrics and force, in detail table 3 shows<br />

that, all values on above .600 on second group are related with the explanation of variance.<br />

In the second part the expected was that the greater values for hand forces were on the early hour<br />

and Monday, but results are not in that direction, for right hand force within hours, table 7 shows a<br />

difference only between the first hour of the test and 2.5 hours later. For left hand there is not<br />

statistical evidence that shows how force decrease in function of time.<br />

For hand force behavior related to day week, due to more than 90% of people are right-handed,<br />

the expected force behavior is that on Monday are the greater averages while on Friday should be<br />

the smaller averages. Table 12 shows that there is not any significative difference on right hand<br />

force average. For left hand force average, respect to Monday is valid a decreasing force behavior<br />

but statistically is valid only to Friday, on Tuesday the difference on average is only respect to<br />

Friday. The other days remain the same.<br />

As a final conclusion on this research the findings is that force has not a decreasing behavior due<br />

to hours or days, it makes necessary to increase the number of measurements and run a test for<br />

the thumb force.<br />

This fact, no decreasing force behavior should be not assumed as a fatigue free operations, while<br />

data were collected people says how at the end of the day they are with symptoms of pain and<br />

numbness on fingers, wrist, shoulder, neck and low back. Highly repetitive operations may have<br />

not an effect on force but that does not means that is an easy job.<br />

In maquilas, there is a lot of situations that should be improved, beyond manufacturing and quality<br />

is the human being, it is not only manpower, they are people and deserve a good place to<br />

workon.<br />

References<br />

Bernard, B. (1997). “Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors; A Critical Review of<br />

Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper<br />

Extremity, and Low Back”.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for<br />

Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 65


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Colombini, D. (1998) 'An observational method for classifying exposure to repetitive movements<br />

of the upper limbs', Ergonomics, 41:9, 1261 – 1289.<br />

McAtamney, L. Corlet, N., (1973).“RULA; A survey method for the investigation of work-related<br />

upper limb disorders”. Applied Ergonomics; 24(2), 91-99.<br />

Muggleton, J. M., Allen, R. and Chappell, P. H.,(1999.) “Hand and arm injuries associated with<br />

repetitive manual work in industry: a review of disorders, risk factors and preventive measures”,<br />

Ergonomics, 42:5, 714 – 739.<br />

Keyserling, W. M., Stetson, D. S., Silverstein, B. A. and Brouwer, M. L. (1993) “A checklist for<br />

evaluating ergonomic risk factors associated with upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders”,<br />

Ergonomics, 36:7, 807 – 831.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 66


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS VERIFICATION IN FACILITIES <strong>DE</strong>SIGNED<br />

FOR NEW <strong>DE</strong>VELOPED PRE-SCHOOL LEVEL BUILDINGS IN THE<br />

EDUCATIONAL SECTOR IN HERMOSILLO, SONORA DURING 2007-2008.<br />

Francis María Quintero Díaz 1 , Manuel Sandoval Delgado 1<br />

1 Departamento de Investigación y Posgrado<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Hermosillo.<br />

Ave. Tecnológico y Periférico Poniente S/N Colonia Sahuaro.<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora 83170<br />

Corresponding author’s e-mail: francis_mquinterod@hotmail.com, msandoval@ith.mx<br />

RESUMEN: Alrededor de todo el mundo, en el seno de toda clase de comunidades, con<br />

independencia de condiciones económicas, u otras características físicas, existen escuelas en<br />

condiciones precarias que se constituyen en barreras, a veces infranqueables, para que tanto los<br />

estudiantes, como profesores y personal técnico y administrativo desarrollen sus actividades<br />

normales dentro de los planteles con éxito. Tales condiciones pueden ser los niveles de ruido,<br />

iluminación, temperatura y ventilación a los que están expuestos diariamente, es por eso que<br />

hace dos años en la ciudad de Hermosillo sonora se empezaron a construir escuelas de nivel<br />

preescolar diseñadas para que estas condiciones no afecten las actividades de las personas que<br />

laboran en ellas.<br />

El propósito de esta investigación es realizar un estudio comparativo entre la normatividad<br />

correspondiente que rige el diseño y construcción del salón de clases donde laboran los niños y<br />

el personal de las instalaciones de los edificios de nueva creación del nivel preescolar en el<br />

sector educativo, en cuanto a medio ambiente se refiere; tales como ruido, iluminación y<br />

temperatura, con los parámetros realmente encontrados en dichas instalaciones.<br />

ABSTRACT: Around the world, within all kind of communities, regardless of the economic<br />

condition or any other physical characteristic there are schools in such poor conditions that create,<br />

sometimes insurmountable, barriers for students, teachers, as well as technical and administrative<br />

staff to successfully develop their diary activities within school. Such conditions are related with:<br />

noise level, lighting, temperature and ventilation which users are daily exposed to. As a response<br />

to this situation, the pre-school level facilities that were designed so that the environmental<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 67


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

conditions could not affect the daily activities of their users, started to be constructed two years<br />

ago in Hermosillo Sonora.<br />

The aim of this research is compare the corresponding regulations ruling the design and<br />

construction of classroom where children work and the personnel of pre-school level new facilities<br />

in the educational sector in terms of environment such as: noise, light and temperature with<br />

parameters actually found in these facilities.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

From the very moment of our birth we find ourselves immerse in a physical environment essential<br />

for life; however, if that environment degrades, it might become an enemy of our health that would<br />

chase us until the end (González, 1990).<br />

According to the Instituto de Infraestructura Física Educativa (INIFED) (Institute of Educational<br />

Physical Infrastructure), the classroom is where children and young people can reach through<br />

knowledge a great number of better opportunities; therefore, it is necessary that all Mexican<br />

students have access to quality education and schools that inspire and motivate the learning<br />

(INIFED, 2008).<br />

2. OBJECTIVE<br />

Decide if the design of facilities for new developed pre-school level buildings in the educational<br />

sector meets criteria established by the official standards regarding the design of the working<br />

environment (noise, lighting, temperature and ventilation).<br />

3. METHODOLOGY<br />

The methodology carried out in this research is accordance with the Official Standards ruling the<br />

design of working environment, such as:<br />

3.1 Federal Regulation of Security, Hygiene, and Working Environment.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 68


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

This regulation establishes the necessary measures to prevent accidents and illness of work,<br />

trying to get the work done under safe, health and appropriate environmental conditions for<br />

workers, in accordance with the Federal Labor Law and the International Trade held and ratified<br />

by the United Mexican States related to these matters (Federal Regulation of Security, Hygiene,<br />

and Working Environment), (1997)<br />

3.2 Mexican Official Standards.<br />

3.2.1 Mexican Official Standard NOM-011-STPS-2001, security and health conditions in<br />

workplaces where noise is produced.<br />

Data collected in Appendix B evaluation of the level of exposure to noise tells the following:<br />

To evaluate noise in a permanent workplace the previous rule recommends that measuring spot<br />

must be located in the place the worker usually takes (in this particular case, the child) otherwise,<br />

as close as possible to it without hinder his/her work. In the same way, when a person works<br />

seated, the microphone has to be placed at the workers head average level. Measurements were<br />

taken as recommended.<br />

Measurements were taken to the following conditions:<br />

Children singing.<br />

Children performing current activities (NOM-011-STPS-2001), (1994).<br />

3.2.2 Mexican Official Standard NOM-015-STPS-1994, regarding to the labor exposure of high or<br />

low thermal conditions in workplaces.<br />

This rule makes some recommendations to take measurements, among them:<br />

The position of the measuring spots depends on needs and characteristic of each area<br />

and/or workplace. In this case, measurements were taken in the classroom central spot.<br />

The height of the measurement equipment was set in accordance with the height of the<br />

children’s work area (table): 60 cm.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 69


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The evaluation must be made at least three times during the 8 hour working day. Since<br />

children work day lasts 3 hours, it was decided to take measurements every hour, starting<br />

from the time they get in until the time they get of (NOM-015-STPS-1994), (1994).<br />

3.2.3 The Mexican Official Standard NOM-025-STPS-1999, lighting conditions in workplaces.<br />

The following activities were carried out according to law recommendations mentioned before:<br />

Workplace reconnaissance.<br />

Since sunlight and electric light are used, both conditions’ measurements were taken. For<br />

the electric light, lamps were turned on 20 minutes before.<br />

Measurement spots were set in accordance with the working area by the following formula:<br />

Where:<br />

Working area index/rate.<br />

Working area dimensions (length and width) in meters.<br />

Lamps height regarding the working surface, in meters.<br />

In this case:<br />

The number above is placed in the following table:<br />

Index of<br />

area<br />

Table 1. Proportion between the working area index and the number of measurement areas<br />

Minimum number of areas Number of areas to be considered<br />

to be evaluated<br />

by the limitation<br />

4 6<br />

9 12<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 70


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

16 20<br />

25 30<br />

Therefore, 9 areas were evaluated. Once the measurements were obtained, the % of Reflection<br />

Factor was calculated (to compare information later on) by the following method:<br />

Measurement spots must be the same as those set in the previous item.<br />

Calculation of the surface’s reflection factor:<br />

1. A first measurement (E1) is taken, with the luxmeter’s photocell facing the surface, at 10<br />

cm ± 2 cm distance, until the reading remains constant;<br />

2. In order to measure the incident light, the second measurement (E2) is taken with the<br />

photocell on the surface facing the opposite direction;<br />

3. The surface Reflection Factor (Kf ) is calculated with the following equation:<br />

(NOM-025-STPS-1999), (1999).<br />

3.3 Instituto Nacional de la Infraestructura Física Educativa (INIFED). (Institute of Educational<br />

Physical Infrastructure) The INIFED (2009) is the organization of the Federal Public Administration<br />

responsible for the construction, restoration, maintenance and equipment of the national<br />

educational physical infrastructure. It is important to mention that this institution does not say how<br />

to take measurements, it only provides parameters that must be met regarding the working<br />

environment; in addition to that it is based on the Mexican Official Standards.<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

Results shown below were collected in three classrooms during summer time.<br />

4.1 Noise:<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 71<br />

(2<br />

)


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 2. Results of the Noise Factor’s (Lux) measurements.<br />

1 2 3<br />

Max Min Max Min Max Min<br />

Children singing 89 47.5 85 51.3 86.4 45.6<br />

Current activity 87.5 43.8 75.6 42.6 8 43.8<br />

4.2 Temperature.<br />

Table 3. Result of the Temperature Factor’s (Lux) measurements.<br />

1 2 3<br />

09:30 a.m.<br />

Min 24.5 22.8 24.7<br />

Average 25.9 24.8 26.6<br />

Max 27.3 26.7 28.4<br />

Min 28.9 28.4 29.8<br />

10:30 a.m. Average 29.5 29 29.7<br />

Max 30.2 29.7 29.7<br />

Min 33.3 32.4 34.2<br />

11:30 a.m. Average 33.7 33.2 34.7<br />

Max 34.1 34 35.2<br />

4.3 Lighting.<br />

Classroom<br />

Table 4. Results of the Lighting Factor’s measurements, classroom 1.<br />

LIGHTING (Lux) % REFLECTION FACTOR<br />

Natural Lighting Electric Lighting<br />

Natural<br />

Lighting<br />

Electric<br />

Lighting<br />

Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min<br />

Measurement #1 264.7 233.3 640 590 40.0075 30.7758 28.5762 27.5937<br />

Measurement #2 534 486 748 716 26.7790 27.8600 29.2647 28.3798<br />

Measurement #3 547 478 947 756 27.7879 30.9205 29.2647 28.8359<br />

Measurement #4 912 892 1285 1234 24.4517 24.0022 25.0405 24.7081<br />

Measurement #5 1113 1070 1389 1373 29.3800 22.6168 26.3570 24.4136<br />

Measurement #6 1181 1139 1439 1434 22.5402 22.8709 23.3009 21.9456<br />

Measurement #7 494 398 918 891 30.6072 26.4070 27.1132 23.1986<br />

Measurement # 8 632 483 980 726 30.8723 26.2456 25.5478 21.6591<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 72


Classroom<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 5. Results of the Lighting Factor’s measurements, classroom 2.<br />

LIGHTING (Lux) % REFLECTION FACTOR<br />

Natural Lighting Electric Lighting<br />

Natural<br />

Lighting<br />

Electric<br />

Lighting<br />

Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min<br />

Measurement #1 318 299 525 506 32.7044 33.7792 36.1904 36.5612<br />

Measurement #2 347 323 614 607 39.7694 41.7956 32.8990 32.1252<br />

Measurement #3 735 712 651 636 27.4829 26.1235 37.6344 27.9874<br />

Measurement #4 668 654 812 803 38.4730 36.5443 36.8226 33.7484<br />

Measurement #5 597 557 955 814 38.3584 39.1382 42.1989 39.9262<br />

Measurement #6 606 591 787 761 40.4290 32.4873 39.7712 40.3416<br />

Measurement #7 395 347 758 682 40.5063 44.6685 37.2031 39.8826<br />

Measurement # 8 465 446 872 832 38.9247 39.4618 37.2706 30.8894<br />

Classroom<br />

Table 6. Results of the Lighting Factor’s measurements, classroom 3.<br />

LIGHTING (Lux) % REFLECTION FACTOR<br />

Natural Lighting Electric Lighting<br />

Natural<br />

Lighting<br />

Electric<br />

Lighting<br />

Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min<br />

Measurement #1 290 276 535 518 35.5172 36.5942 35.3271 35.9073<br />

Measurement #2 325 305 624 607 39.3846 43.9344 32.0512 32.1252<br />

Measurement #3 680 677 635 628 29.5588 28.0649 36.2204 27.0700<br />

Measurement #4 670 655 821 807 29.5522 28.5496 35.3227 31.7224<br />

Measurement #5 620 598 859 851 28.8709 26.7558 46.5657 38.0728<br />

Measurement #6 586 580 789 771 29.0102 28.2758 39.5437 39.6887<br />

Measurement #7 405 398 759 682 35.3086 35.4271 36.8906 39.8826<br />

Measurement # 8 486 476 921 897 26.3374 25.8403 35.1791 28.6510<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 73


4.4 Ventilation.<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 1. Windows view.<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS.<br />

The Mexican Official Standard number 011 concerning to noise indicates that a hazardous<br />

situation occurs when dBs number surpasses 90. In this case the noise did not exceed the limit, at<br />

least not when children were there.<br />

The INIFED states that the advisable environmental conditions for working in a comfortable area,<br />

in the case of classrooms, are 18 to 25 Celsius, noticing that this condition is not fulfilled since<br />

most measurement exceeded 25 Celsius.<br />

According to the prevoiusly analized NOM 025, the lowest lighting level must be 300 (lux) for older<br />

people. As is noticed in the prevoius measurements, this parameter is not met, so that we can<br />

infer that light is not well distributed. The reflection on the furniture where kids work was another<br />

important issue that was evaluated and according to INIFED standards, the reflection highest<br />

value should be 50%, and as it is noticed in the previous measurements, does not exceed such<br />

level.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 74


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

6. REFERENCES.<br />

González Gallego Santiago (1990). La ergonomía y el ordenador. Primera edición, Editorial<br />

Marcombo, S. A. Barcelona España.<br />

Instituto Nacional de la Infraestructura Física Educativa (INIFED), (2008).<br />

http://www.inifed.gob.mx/templates/objetivos.asp. Página visitada el 13 de agosto de 2009.<br />

INIFED, (2009). Volumen 3. Habitabilidad y funcionamiento. Tomo I. Diseño Arquitectónico.<br />

http://www.inifed.gob.mx/templates/normas%20t%C3%A9cnicas.asp. Página visitada el 12 de<br />

marzo de 2009.<br />

(NOM-011-STPS-2001), (1994). Publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 06 de julio de<br />

1994. México, D.F. http://www.stps.gob.mx/DGSST/normatividad/noms/Nom-011.pdf. Recopilada<br />

en la página el 6 de mayo de 2009.<br />

(NOM-015-STPS-1994), (1994). Publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 19 de julio de<br />

1993. México D.F. http://www.stps.gob.mx/DGSST/normatividad/noms/NOM-015.pdf. Recopilada<br />

en pagina el 6 de mayo de 2009.<br />

(NOM-025-STPS-1999), (1999). Publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 27 de<br />

septiembre de 2005, México, D.F.<br />

http://www.stps.gob.mx/DGSST/normatividad/noms/Nom-025.pdf. Recopilada en la página el 6 de<br />

mayo de 2009.<br />

(Reglamento Federal de seguridad, higiene y medio ambiente de trabajo), (1997). Publicado<br />

en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 21 de enero de 1997. México, D.F.<br />

http://www.stps.gob.mx/marcojuridico/vinculos_juridico/reglamentos_marco/r_seguridad.pdf.<br />

Recopilada en la página el 6 de mayo de 2009.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 75


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

ADVANTAGES OF THE ORTHOGONAL ARRANGEMENTS OF THE METHOD<br />

TAGUCHI IN THE <strong>DE</strong>SIGN OF EXPERIMENTS IN ERGONOMIC<br />

Alois Fabiani-Bello 1 , Humberto García-Castellanos 2 , and Rosa M. Reyes 2<br />

1 Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias de la Ingeniería (DOCI)<br />

Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez<br />

Ave. Del Charro 450N, C.P. 32190<br />

Cd. Juárez, Chihuahua, México.<br />

e-mail: fides.sde@gmail.com<br />

2 Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Juárez<br />

Av. Tecnológico Nro. 1340<br />

Cd. Juárez, Chihuahua, México.<br />

Resumen: Los métodos estadísticos basados en la función Chi-Cuadrada son frecuentemente<br />

utilizados por los ergónomos y estas técnicas por su naturaleza no paramétrica usualmente<br />

requieren de una gran cantidad de datos experimentales con el correspondiente uso de recursos<br />

y contienen una importante dosis de subjetividad basada en la experiencia del experimentador.<br />

Las metodologías de experimentación podrían ser más rápidas y más económicas para tomar<br />

decisiones con la mejor información estadística posible utilizando técnicas apropiadas del Diseño<br />

de Experimentos. El autor Fabiani-Bello et.al. (Conergo, 2008) expone un método conceptual<br />

basado en simulación Monte Carlo y experimentos sin réplicas que fueron utilizados para planear<br />

la experimentación en ergonomía al categorizar la fatiga visual o astenopia. En base a la misma<br />

línea de trabajo Reyes-Martínez et.al. (Conergo, 2009) muestra los primeros resultados del<br />

método caracterizando la fatiga visual según publicaciones recientes dando a lugar la<br />

identificación clara de los factores que influyen en la astenopia y pone a prueba los métodos<br />

estadísticos tradicionales. Después de dos años de investigar las ventajas y limitaciones del<br />

método Taguchi en varias aplicaciones experimentales se propone en este artículo el método<br />

validado del diseño experimental basado en arreglos ortogonales del Método Taguchi que podría<br />

ser usado en los experimentos de la ergonomía donde, según el ajuste de niveles factoriales de<br />

diseño, es posible medir el impacto de estos arreglos en alguna variable de interés retomando las<br />

conclusiones obtenidas hasta la fecha sobre el tema.<br />

Palabras Clave: Metodo Taguchi, Arreglos Ortogonales, Diseño de Experimentos<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 76


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

2<br />

Abstract: The statistical methods based on the Chi-square of test ( χ ) are much used by the<br />

ergonomics and these need from a significant and big size of the sample with the corresponding<br />

use of resources and it contains an important dose of the subjectivity. Due to the cost of<br />

opportunity the methodologies must be more rapid in the treatment of the information, must be<br />

more economic and to take decisions with the best statistical information. Fabiani (2008) proposes<br />

a conceptual method based on simulation Monte Carlo that was used to plan the experimentation<br />

in ergonomics to the categorizer the visual fatigue. Based on the same line of work Reyes-<br />

Martínez et.al. (2009) it shows the first results of the method characterizing the visual fatigue as<br />

recent publications. The authoress identifies in a clear way the factors that influence the astenopia<br />

and it puts to test the statistical traditional methods. After two years of investigating the<br />

advantages and limitations of the method Taguchi in several experimental applications there is<br />

proposed in this article the validated method of the experimental design based on orthogonal<br />

arrangements of the Method Taguchi. The method that might be used in the experiments of the<br />

ergonomics where according to the level adjustment factorials of design it is possible to measure<br />

the impact of these arrangements in some variable of interest recapturing the conclusions<br />

obtained up to the date on the topic.<br />

.<br />

Key words: Taguchi Methods, Orthogonal Array, Experimental Design.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The visual system is one of the principal organs of the human being since 80% of the emotions<br />

are perceived across the sight. The sciences that study the system of the sight begin to be<br />

interested in the labor matters at the end of the XIXth century turning into a more and more<br />

specializing professional activity and into a world more industrialized (Reyes-Martinez et.al, 2005).<br />

The new places and forms of work, the beginning of the automation and the systems of industrial<br />

production based on the competition for the quality (De la Vara, 2002) give place to a symptom<br />

that starts attracting attention of some specialists and especially of the companies because they<br />

realize that sometimes his workpeople can suffer a serious damage: The most common<br />

complaint, as for visual inconveniences, is vaguely described as " tired sight ". Other symptoms<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 77


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

indicate blurry sight or the difficulty to focus objects closely or of far, the unsteady vision and the<br />

double image. The headache is the most common general symptom, but not always it must be<br />

related to the visual weariness. Specifically, the symptoms of weariness or visual fatigue can be<br />

aggravated by diverse factors. On the other hand, the sight deteriorates gradually in the adults<br />

and this decrease is marked especially between 30 and 50 years (Reyes-Martinez et.al. 2005).<br />

The system of vision of the human being perceives the reality across the eyes, by means of these<br />

the brain perceives the signs and processes them; these signs are received in an environment<br />

with lighting, the color, the moisture between others they generate changeability in the system of<br />

vision. With the time, the visual system deteriorates for the rhythm of industrial repetitive work.<br />

The signs of Visual Fatigue as the frequency of blinking might be abstracted as exits of the effort<br />

of the system to face his fatigue (Okada, 2002).<br />

The relation between the Engineering of Quality and the Ergonomics is real because both want to<br />

improve the yield of a system, in the first case the experimentation has an important role in new<br />

products design, in developing manufacturing processes and in the improvement of processes<br />

and in the second case the characterization of factors so that the health is not damaged in the<br />

persons. With regard to the experimentation one of the most used methodologies and recognized<br />

for its efficiency is the one proposed by Dr. Genichi Taguchi. In Quality Engineering, it is<br />

mandatory to select the operative levels of the control factors that affect to critical characteristic of<br />

quality, and then abstracting the Visual Fatigue as a "characteristic of quality" it is necessary to<br />

minimize it.<br />

2. METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING THE PARAMETERS<br />

To understand and to talk about the interaction between the persons and his environment implies<br />

respecting many methodological, statistical restrictions and even of anthropology; the experience<br />

says to us that these models that to the moment can be only theoretical, help to understand the<br />

behavior of the system more they do not allow to manipulate it. Our methodology is designed only<br />

for knowledge of relations cause - effect between the factors and the variable of exit of the<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 78


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

system. In this sense the method Taguchi for the prophecy of the output variable in the process is<br />

most adapted for our case; the process can be divided into five stages summarized in Table 1.<br />

N<br />

o.<br />

1 Preparation<br />

2.<br />

Table 1. Stages for the experimental design<br />

Stage Activity Content<br />

Determination of<br />

factors and levels<br />

1.1 Determine the experimental objective and targetcharacteristic<br />

values.<br />

1.2 Determine whether it is worthwhile to carry out the<br />

experiment under the current conditions.<br />

2.1 List all factors that relate to the objective (more<br />

than 50) with a Focus Group<br />

2.2 Select and determine factors and levels to be<br />

tested.<br />

3. Assignment 3.1 Assign factors and levels to the orthogonal array.<br />

4. Experiment<br />

5. Data analysis<br />

4.1 Eliminate the obstacles hindering the experiment.<br />

4.2 To continued the process of randomized<br />

experimentation generating only an experimental reply.<br />

4.3 With the simulation Monte Carlo all the possible<br />

outputs will be obtained<br />

5.1 To construct the correlogram and to interpret the<br />

coefficient of Pearson to characterize the incidental<br />

factors.<br />

5.3 Determine the optimum condition and to confirm<br />

them with the existing norms in the legal environment<br />

of Occupational Health.<br />

The sequence of the methodology and the recommendations of his application are based on the<br />

interpretation that the Dr. Teuro Mori does to the method Taguchi in his work titled originally "<br />

Taguchi Mesoddo or tsukatta yasashii shinjikken keikakuho nyumon " (1946).<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 79


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

2.1. Experimental Design Application: First and Second Stage – Preparation and<br />

Determination of factors y levels.<br />

The target of the experimentation applied to the ergonomics will have to maximize or minimize an<br />

effect and it is clear that to maximize a variable sometimes implies minimizing his complement.<br />

The clear identification of the variable of exit of the interaction between the man and the system is<br />

important. The scope of the experiment is to know the factors that they affect in the awaited result<br />

and to arrange them according to his contribution to the changeability of the system.<br />

At first more than 50 potential factors must be put in a list and to obtain this number it is necessary<br />

to ask medical specialists that have worked with the topic, it is key to confirm points of view of the<br />

participants and to assume a position based on the nature of the industry at which one is<br />

employed. The information will be better if it is investigated in the arbitrated publications,<br />

catalogues and tests previous.<br />

Another key of the ergonomic experimental process is to classify the factors and to define the<br />

levels of the experimentation, for this activity it is necessary to identify clearly the class of factor<br />

(Mori, 1946). As well as to classify to the factors in the function to his relation with the studied<br />

effect and to avoid the strong interaction between them, this is important for the complexity of the<br />

system in study. We cannot experiment with all the factors but the target here is to consider all the<br />

important factors. In this stage of the experimentation the people can have different opinions, in<br />

such a situation, we do not have to classify rigorously the factors and that's why we make use of<br />

orthogonal series to confirm his effect.<br />

After defining the factors, we determine his levels. The number of levels should be two, three, or<br />

four. The use of three levels is recommended in particular (G.Taguchi, 1986). The works of the<br />

theoretical investigation demonstrated that this type of level determination they generate<br />

quadratic’s terms in the model (Fabiani-Bello, 2008).<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 80


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

2.2. Experimental Design Application: Third Stage – Assignment.<br />

It is known that the most usual criterion to select the experimental design is the reduction of the<br />

variance of the regression coefficients. The key element to select a design that diminishes the<br />

variance is the orthogonality concept used by Taguchi in experimental designs. In fact, the<br />

complete factorial designs of two levels and the fractions of resolution III are orthogonal.<br />

In the ergonomic experimentation is possible to separate main effects and interactions using<br />

either of the following methods: (1) assign the main effect to the points to the linear graph<br />

assuming that interactions between three factors does not exist; (2) use a special orthogonal array<br />

where interactions confound equally with every level of the main effects. The first method uses the<br />

columns corresponding to the points on the linear graph en orthogonal arrays L 8 , L16,<br />

L32,<br />

L9<br />

and L 27 . For the second method L 12, L18<br />

and 36<br />

L orthogonal arrays are used which are of practical<br />

use in the industry for their effectiveness and reduction of costs (Wu, 1992).<br />

If we cannot anticipate possible interactions between factors, we can obtain quite a lot of<br />

information from past experience. But, if we cannot anticipate interactions, we can take any of the<br />

following approaches: (1) Assign the interaction between two factors. (2) Use orthogonal arrays<br />

12 , L18<br />

L or 36<br />

assign factors.<br />

L that does not generate interaction information. (3)Ignore interactions when you<br />

For experiments in ergonomics it is of interest principally to know the principal effects of factors,<br />

from what the second option is most recommended since it uses three levels and does not need<br />

to stop in the study of interactions that might be subjective in this stage of the process although<br />

the ability to anticipate is a part of technological know-how (G.Taguchi, 1986). For this reason the<br />

Taguchi methods for the case of study have been programmed in spreadsheets because these<br />

allow flexibility of programming for this type of algorithms. In fact, it contains statistical tools.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 81


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

2.3. Experimental Design Application: Fourth Stage – Experimentation.<br />

In the industry the resources are in general limited it is very probable that the number of<br />

experiments is limited to the available budget, in this case a design factorial finished and with only<br />

one experimental response can be used, nevertheless the principal effects can contain an error<br />

generated by the external noise (Montgomery, 2006). The principal disability of this method<br />

consists of the fact that is known that to certain number of factors this process is expensive.<br />

The methodology Taguchi usually guarantees less experimental tests and makes use of the big<br />

advantage of the orthogonal arrangements then to construct a reliable model to know the value of<br />

the average of the process with the following equation:<br />

ˆ = y + ( A − y)<br />

+ ( B − y)<br />

+ ... + ( N − y)<br />

(1)<br />

y k<br />

r<br />

s<br />

Where:<br />

yˆ = theoretical average of the process.<br />

y = real average of the process.<br />

A , B,...<br />

N Are the experimental factors.<br />

k , r,...<br />

s Are the levels of the experimental factors.<br />

In this way, the Monte Carlo method is used to simulate all possible iterations in a predictive<br />

model of values of the average. This means that in our methodology there will be randomized the<br />

order of the capture of information to only one reply and later to obtain the theoretical model of the<br />

average based on the contribution of the principal effects, with the equation (1) there will be<br />

generated all the possible values of the average making use of the Simulation Monte Carlo. In<br />

studies realized with regard to the MAPE of the theoretical model his value is usually 4 %<br />

(Fabiani, 2008).<br />

With regard to the person chosen for the experiment, the International Organization of the Work<br />

tells that the "average" worker does not exist in the reality, but based on the requests of the<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 82


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

industrial work for which is experienced it is known that the profile of the person who executes the<br />

task and the Ergonomist jointly with the Engineer can suggest the conditions of an operator<br />

qualified for the position, this is that person who has necessary fitness, with required intelligence<br />

and instruction and who has acquired the workmanship and necessary knowledge to carry out the<br />

current work as norms of quality, quantity, health and safety (OIT, 1986).<br />

2.4 Application of experimental Design: Fifth Stage – Analysis of the information.<br />

Changing the levels of the factors, it is possible to know the interrelation between variables of<br />

entry and variables of exit to the system, the distributions of frequency for every variable and to<br />

the simulation of the experiment. Finally, the simulated population is validated comparing the<br />

levels of interrelation between variables and the percentage of obtained contribution of the<br />

ANOVA.<br />

The method allows to obtain a graphic report of different iterations to select the best combination<br />

of parameters. The relationship between the response variable and the independent variables is<br />

obtained based on the experience in previous investigations, which has found a narrow relation<br />

between coefficient of Pearson with the ANOVA (García-Castellanos and Fabiani-Bello, 2007).<br />

The following step is to verify the law with regard to the important factors in the response of the<br />

model and if norms do not exist on this matter it is necessary to choose the most appropriate<br />

levels of operation that maximize or minimize the response.<br />

3. CONCLUSIONS<br />

It has been demonstrated that Taguchi methods are an important tool. Due to its simplicity, the<br />

use of these methods has become frequent in different areas and different productive processes.<br />

After the statistical experimentation, the Taguchi methodology allows to predict the performance of<br />

a process by means. The implementation of this methodology is simple and practical and it does<br />

not require of advanced statistical knowledge. Also, the validation of the method presented here<br />

could be by means of a case of study.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 83


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

4. REFERENCES<br />

Ross, Phillip J. (1996). Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. McGraw-Hill Co., United<br />

States of America.<br />

Wu, Yuin, and Wu Alan (1997) Diseño Robusto utilizando los métodos Taguchi. Díaz de Santos<br />

S.A. Ed, Madrid, Spain.<br />

Suart P. Glen (1993), Taguchi Methods: a hands-on approach Addison-Wesley Co, Inc., United<br />

States of America.<br />

American Supplier Institute, Inc. (1987) Introduction to Quality Engineering: Course Manual.<br />

Center for Taguchi Methods, United States of America.<br />

Terou Mori (1946). The New Experimental Design, ASI Press, United States of America.<br />

Nelson Rodríguez (1999), Aplicación del Diseño de Experimentos para determinar el máximo<br />

peso aceptable en el manejo manual de materiales, Departamento de Ingeniería<br />

Industrial, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia.<br />

Tames Gonzalez S, Mart'nez-Alcántara S., Use of personal computers and health damages in<br />

newspaper industry workers. Salud Publica Mex 1993;35:177-185, Mexico.<br />

Rosa María Reyes Martínez M.C et al. (2005), Ergoftalmología: Análisis de los Factores que<br />

Inciden Astenopía de los Trabajadores de Inspección Visual Industria Electrónica de<br />

Ciudad Juárez, Memorias del VII Congreso Internacional de Ergonomía, Nuevo León,<br />

México, 3 al 5 de noviembre del 2005.<br />

Akira Okada (2001), Medición de la "Fatiga Visual", Universidad de Osaka, Panasonic Services<br />

(Central), Sancho de Ávila, 54, 1ª planta, Barcelona, Spain.<br />

Guillermo Martínez de la Teja, Diseño ergonómico para estaciones de trabajo con<br />

computadoras, Memorias del II Congreso Internacional de Ergonomía, Ciudad Juárez,<br />

México, Mayo 2000.<br />

Victor García-Castellanos, Alois C. Fabiani-Bello, and Humberto Hijar-Rivera (2007), A<br />

Computing Approach Based On The Taguchi Methods To Optimize The Selection Of<br />

Factors For The Nominal-The-Best Characteristics, Proceedings Of The 12th Annual,<br />

International Conference On Industrial Engineering, Theory, Applications and Practice,<br />

Cancun, Mexico, November 4-7, 2007.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 84


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Fabiani-Bello, Alois (2008), Aportación Metodológica al Diseño de Productos Robustos según la<br />

filosofía de Genichi Taguchi, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Instituto<br />

Tecnológico de Ciudad Juárez, México.<br />

Reyes-Martinez, Rosa (2009), Categorization of factors causing asthenopia en research<br />

professors at the itcj by Reading wit vdt: a shared experience, SEMAC 2009, pp. 154-166<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 85


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

ACA<strong>DE</strong>MIC ASSAYS FOR ERGONOMICS.<br />

LDI Zoe Madai Cruz Purata 1 , LDI María del Sagrario Medina Rodríguez 2 , Arq. Julio Gerardo<br />

Lorenzo Palomera 3<br />

1 Coordinadora de la Carrera de Diseño de Interiores.<br />

2 3 Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo.<br />

Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas.<br />

Campus Tampico – Madero.<br />

zoemadai@hotmail.com<br />

RESUMEN. Se presentan dos ensayos realizados en la Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y<br />

Urbanismo (FADU). En el contexto interactivo de las carreras de Arquitectura y Diseño de<br />

Interiores, se desarrolló un estudio básico del ambiente acústico que incide en el aula, por otro<br />

lado se hace una aproximación de análisis antropométrico de nuevo mobiliario para los talleres de<br />

diseño.<br />

El estudio acústico tiene como finalidad que el alumno se sensibilice con la noción ergonómica y<br />

se familiarice con herramientas elementales, como el decibelímetro, para diagnosticar y controlar<br />

el ambiente sonoro, ahora a nivel escolar, pensando en su aplicación en entornos reales. Se<br />

sigue un método de medición simple, en una secuencia predeterminada de espacios. Se<br />

obtienen indicadores no del todo adecuados para un óptimo ambiente de aprendizaje.<br />

El diagnóstico de mobiliario se aplica en un juego de restiradores “gemelos”, con dimensiones<br />

establecidas por el fabricante. Se aplica una técnica de observación de postura relacionada con<br />

el alcance y la holgura, de usuarios en interacción con el mueble, de una muestra de la población<br />

estudiantil en la FADU. Los resultados llevan a la reflexión de cómo la aparente comodidad puede<br />

ser realmente una lastimosa costumbre, a ser cultivada en los años de carrera universitaria.<br />

Palabras clave: Interiorismo. Bienestar. Ergonomía. Acústica. Antropometría.<br />

ABSTRACT. We present two tests conducted at the Faculty of Architecture, Design and Urbanism<br />

(FADU). In the interactive context of careers in Architecture and Interior Design, it was developed<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 86


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

a basic study of acoustic environment impact in the classroom. Then it was applied an simple<br />

anthropometric analysis on new design workshops furniture.<br />

The acoustic study aim was to sensitize students about ergonomic notion and become familiar<br />

with basic tools such as decibelímetro, diagnose and control the sound environment, now at<br />

school, thinking about its application in real environments. It was followed a simple measurement<br />

method, in a predetermined sequence of spaces. Obtained indicators were not entirely<br />

appropriate for optimum learning environment.<br />

The diagnosis of furniture applies drawing board in a game of "twins", with dimensions specified<br />

by the manufacturer. It was applied an observational technique of scope and slack related<br />

posture. User - furniture interaction was observed of a sample of the student population. The<br />

results lead to the reflection of how the apparent comfort can be really a pitiful habit to be<br />

cultivated in the years of college.<br />

Keywords: Interiorism. Welfare. Ergonomics. Acoustics. Anthropometry.<br />

PROLOGUE.<br />

We present two academic assays conducted at the Faculty of Architecture, Design and Urbanism<br />

(FADU)<br />

In the interactive context of Architecture and Interior Design careers, it was developed a basic<br />

study of acoustic environment impact in the classroom, besides an approximation of<br />

anthropometric analysis of new furniture for the design workshops. Both exercises are strategies<br />

to reduce the gap between design activities and ergonomics, as well as linking quality as a daily<br />

practice.<br />

Ergonomics as inherent quality factor should be fully present in the field of design. In practice it is<br />

found that various educational trends, not necessarily provide consumers welfare in their models.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 87


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The environmental experience as part of the learning process is student-way reference in its<br />

professional life. Hence the need to reorient educational objectives in design.<br />

Exercise 1: Acoustic study of a learning environment.<br />

1.1. INTRODUCTION. Conceptual Framework.<br />

As part of the exercise was revised conceptual framework based on Mapfre Foundation<br />

Ergonomics Handbook<br />

Ergonomics deals with the study of any physical environment from three sources: the<br />

measurable factors of the environment that are susceptible to modification, the physiological<br />

effects produced by these factors and also how the employee feels that environment. The sound<br />

from the physical point of view is a mechanical vibration transmitted through the air, capable of<br />

being perceived by the auditory organ.<br />

1.1.1. Sound effects in people.<br />

The sound effects can occur in people from three aspects: perception, extra-auditory effects,<br />

auditory effects.<br />

Perception.<br />

The inner ear acts as a transducer, transforming the physical signal (mechanical) in<br />

physiological signal (nervous), which is transmitted through the auditory nerve to auditory cortex,<br />

which produces the integration and interpretation of those signals.<br />

Extra-auditory effects.<br />

The fact that noise can cause physiological reactions of "stress" seems widely accepted, but has<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 88


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

not yet established that these reactions can produce pathological effects. However, an analysis of<br />

more than one hundred relevant literature indicates that the most important are:<br />

Modification of the cardiovascular system: blood and heart rate.<br />

Influence on muscle tone.<br />

Digestive disorders.<br />

Visual function alterations.<br />

Alterations on metabolism.<br />

Auditory effects.<br />

The auditory effects are: injury to the ear and difficulty in language comprehension. For the scope<br />

of the study, was only considered the first. In an environment where understanding of the word<br />

difficult, is very likely that there are difficulties that will lead to discomfort for the worker and work<br />

impairment. The spoken word is a sonic element with high information content, so the process of<br />

perception is determined by various acoustic phenomena and the special interpretation of the<br />

message conveyed by the word.<br />

1.1.2. Acoustic comfort.<br />

The type of noise that bothers more in an office environment, is produced by the talks. Each<br />

type of activity will be treated differently. Can be generalized in terms of noise levels, noise in<br />

manual labor began to be troublesome from 80-90 dB, matching the levels from which they can<br />

and assume the risk of deafness.<br />

1.1.3. Effectiveness.<br />

Noise can alter a person's efficiency decreased performance and increased errors and<br />

accidents. Rates were determined for intellectual work discomfort, for example Beranek (1969)<br />

and Wisner, setting graphic curves correlated noise level in decibels and octaves center<br />

frequencies. The scope of this assay was limited to a simple sequence of measurement, but<br />

checking on the charts for better understanding by students. (Mapfre Ergonomics Manual)<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 89


1.2. OBJECTIVES.<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Sensitize Interior Design students on the need to adapt the environmental conditions for human<br />

activity, in this case, learning. To learn the use of simple measuring sound tools, to diagnose and<br />

monitor a sound environment.<br />

1.3. METHOD.<br />

It was simplified to an academic exercise, the procedure established in the Mexican Official Norm<br />

for the security about noise sources. So, establishing six significant locations in the FADU<br />

campus, the sound pressure was measured. It was used a type 1 sound level meter, with a range<br />

of 50 to 120 dB, for capturing only the sound pressure.<br />

The group of 15 students made measurements in the selected areas thus obtained 90<br />

different indicators. For practical reasons the group was subdivided into two: seven people were<br />

devoted to three sites, and 8 to the other three areas. It was registered measurements taken in<br />

each area for a period of five minutes, for each student.<br />

1.4. RESULTS.<br />

The entire series averages were obtained, performing a table summarizing the average of the<br />

measurements (see Table 1). The teacher previously presented in the classroom as an<br />

introduction to the exercise and how to do it, including a concise explanation of the sound level<br />

meter use.<br />

Table 1. Sound Pressure measurementes.<br />

Site. Sound Pressure. dB<br />

Exterior environment (far away site) 40<br />

Class room 67<br />

Library. 64<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 90


We compare the results:<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Laboratories (under construction) 71<br />

Patio. 66<br />

Cafeteria. 73<br />

a) With the recommended values in the corresponding official Mexican standard, which is 68 dB<br />

from 6:00 to 22:00 and 65 dB from 22:00 to 6:00.<br />

b) With the levels recommended by the ILO (OIT).<br />

c) It was showed the graph produced by Beranek. Although not conducted a detailed acoustic<br />

study to develop positions on the curves plotted, the models allow students to view individual<br />

cases.<br />

It is noted that approximately 55-90 dB levels for intellectual labor, it is extremely painful,<br />

depending on sound frequency.<br />

Table 2. Sound Pressure levels. OIT (ILO).<br />

Effect on humans Sound Level dB. Sound source.<br />

Extremely harmful.<br />

Harmful.<br />

140 Jet engine unit.<br />

130 Riveter.<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100 Truck.<br />

90<br />

Pain threshold.<br />

Propeller aircraft.<br />

Rock drill.<br />

Chainsaw.<br />

Metalworking shop.<br />

dangerous. 80 Busy street (car traffic)<br />

Prevents talk. 70 Passenger car.<br />

60 Normal conversation.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 91


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Irritant. 50 Talk quietly.<br />

1.5. CONCLUSIONS.<br />

40<br />

30 Whispers.<br />

Music played on radio at low<br />

volume.<br />

20 City quiet floor.<br />

10<br />

Whisper<br />

(vegetation).<br />

of leaves<br />

0 Hearing threshold.<br />

It was expressed by the group the distinction of sounds within the classroom and outside, the<br />

habit of perceiving external sounds as part of the learning environment, like a sound<br />

accompaniment. Especially noticed some discomfort because the dominant noise abroad, is to<br />

talk out loud.<br />

Regarding the Library, a combination of whispers, voices, noise from air conditioning<br />

equipment, produce anxiety and stress in the interior. Inside the cafeteria, conversation is difficult<br />

because of the noise.<br />

It was found that the materials used in buildings are not insulated or sound-absorbing. They<br />

are generally flat surfaces finished in painted cement, windows aluminum bearing. Also it was<br />

noted the classrooms air conditioners, as sources of noise.<br />

The exercise participants were sensitized on to consider ergonomics to achieve acoustic<br />

comfort in the spaces.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 92


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

2. ANALYSIS OF NEW <strong>DE</strong>SIGN WORKSHOPS FUNITURE.<br />

2.1. INTRODUCTION.<br />

In Design learning, we consider the experience as a key factor. Since the products generated will<br />

be used by users, which we seeks to satisfy. Considering as example the model of Kolb (1984),<br />

the traditional tendency is to exercise the conceptualization phase mostly in institutions. Taking a<br />

side step, we invited a group of students to think about their academic work. Leaving aside the<br />

conceptualization only about ergonomics, was experienced and observed the use of furniture for<br />

design: a drawing desk prototype.<br />

2.2. OBJECTIVES.<br />

The student through observation, conceptualization and experimentation known anthropometric<br />

parameters.<br />

2.3. METHOD.<br />

Concepts were presented using anthropometry concepts and anthropometric tables, considering<br />

the scope and parameters of clearance,<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 93


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

It was conducted a simple anthropometric prototype drawing board "Twins." Continued as a<br />

methodology: analytical observation of the furniture in situ and photographs, analysis of simulated<br />

activity in furniture-user interaction, considering heights from 1.65 to 1.83 meters, in both sexes.<br />

The positions were static. It took anthropometric reference tables published by Prado-Ávila (2007).<br />

Observations were made of the furniture itself and users interacting with the furniture. There were<br />

registered users feelings about.<br />

It was made a physical survey of the furniture. It consists of two drawing tables linked by a metal<br />

structure made with angles of different caliber and length. Among these was placed additional<br />

shelf. The seat is circular, wood, supported on a rotating structure, a wheel support flange at the<br />

base, allows translation moves, subject to a pivot (see Figure 1). At first glance it seemed<br />

interesting.<br />

Figure 1. “Twins” Drawing Board Prototype<br />

They were invited to use the furniture first requesting suit as they liked it. Later they went in static<br />

postures leading to experience and visualize the scope and clearance parameters, comparing<br />

dimensions between the object and the person.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 94


2.4. RESULTS.<br />

Discoveries:<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The table surface measures 70 x 80 cm which is insufficient to work in a drawing paper sheet, in<br />

addition, there is no support for the drawing tools on the table and they could slip. Other coating is<br />

also recommended as this would prevent the tape off the ground especially because the climate<br />

humidity.<br />

It is needed an convenient adjustable board angle; it was fixed. Since the scope distances ratio<br />

from the user's fingertips on the furniture, creates an awkward bend in the lower back and also<br />

high tension in the shoulders and neck. Raise the height floor-edge of the table (0.91 mts.) would<br />

help to correct posture, facilitating work with the spine erect. For 95th percentile person said he<br />

felt comfortable until he was told to straighten the back (see Figure 2).<br />

Figure 2. Working posture: "comfortable" and erect. Percentile 95.<br />

It is suggested that in addition to the intermediate table support, useful for holding backpacks or<br />

bags, adding a drawer along the front edge of the table in each module for drawing and painting<br />

tools at hand. It is recommended to add a table with pen holders, whose support is articulated, at<br />

least one of the vertical bars of the support desk, and free rotation adaptable to the scope of the<br />

user. This little shelf complement the user's work when to laptop use is needed.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 95


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Regarding the seat, it was noted the absence of lumbar support (lower back), plus the hard, flat<br />

surface is uncomfortable after a while of use, is proposed to be padded, in a broader measure<br />

even for obese people, as default timber is still important to be configured curves of the buttocks<br />

and knee. It would be advisable to consider a footrest support tube in the bank, and the swivel<br />

seat is height adjustment screw. People in 5th percentile needed to rely on tip toes on the ground<br />

(see Figure 3).<br />

2.5. CONCLUSIONS.<br />

Figure 3. Sitting posture Percentile 5.<br />

Continuing the efforts to sensitize the academic population at the Faculty of Architecture, Design<br />

and Urbanism of the UAT, to update the application of ergonomics, we believe these tests<br />

successful. The training process needs to adapt to the dynamic professional. In the field of design,<br />

experience is gained from learning in workshops and classrooms.<br />

In the second exercise, underwent an apparent "comfort" in the use of furniture design from the<br />

anthropometric point of view, and recognized awkward postures. The experience generated<br />

improvement ideas.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 96


5. REFERENCES.<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Ávila Ch. R.- Prado L., L. – González M., L (2007). Dimensiones antropométricas. Población<br />

Latinoamericana. Universidad de Guadalajara. Centro Universitario de Arte, Arquitectura y<br />

Diseño. Centro de Investigaciones en Ergonomía. México.<br />

Beranek, Leo L. (1969). Acústica. Editorial Hispanoamericana. Buenos Aires.<br />

Fundación Mapfre (1997). Manual de Ergonomía. Editorial Mapfre. Madrd.<br />

NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-081-ECOL-1994. Límites máximos permisibles de emisión de<br />

ruido de las fuentes fijas y su método de medición.<br />

http://www.sma.df.gob.mx/tsai/archivos/pdf/12nom-081-ecol-1994.pdf<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 97


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE VARIABLES OF<br />

TEMPERATURE, STRENGTH AND CYCLES PER MINUTE TO<br />

PERFORM HORIZONTAL REPETITIVE MOVEMENTS OF THE WRIST<br />

Camargo Wilson Claudia 1, 2 , Rivera Valerio Abril A. 1 ,<br />

Rubio Martinez Jesus R. 1 , de la Vega Bustillos Enrique J. 3 ,<br />

López Bonilla Oscar R. 2 , Olguín Tiznado Jesús E. 1, 2 ,<br />

1, 2<br />

Báez López Yolanda A.<br />

1 Department of Industrial Engineering - Engineering Faculty Ensenada.<br />

Autonomous University of Baja California.<br />

Km. 103 Highway Tijuana-Ensenada S/N<br />

Ensenada, Baja California. Zip code 22760<br />

ccamargo@uabc.edu.mx, abrilriva@hotmail.com, rodolforubio@yahoo.com<br />

2 Division of Posgrade and Research MyDCI- Engineering Faculty Ensenada.<br />

Autonomous University of Baja California.<br />

Km. 103 Highway Tijuana-Ensenada S/N<br />

Ensenada, Baja California. 22760<br />

olopez@uabc.edu.mx, jeol79@uabc.edu.mx, yolanda@uabc.edu.mx<br />

3 Division of Postgraduate Studies and Research<br />

Technological Institute of Hermosillo<br />

Technological Avenue S/N<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora. 83170<br />

e_delavega_mx@yahoo.com<br />

RESUMEN. La necesidad de proteger a los trabajadores contra las causas que provocan tanto<br />

enfermedades profesionales como accidentes de trabajo es una cuestión indudable. De ahí el<br />

interés de analizar el comportamiento que tienen las variables de temperatura en el área de la<br />

muñeca, la fuerza y los ciclos por minuto ello al llevar a cabo movimientos repetitivos horizontales<br />

de la muñeca, los cuales son comúnmente encontrados en los lugares de trabajo. Objetivos:<br />

Correlacionar las variables de temperatura, fuerza y cantidad de movimientos por minuto cuando<br />

se trabaja con el movimiento repetitivo horizontal en el área de la muñeca. Delimitación del<br />

problema: Se simuló la jornada laboral de ocho horas con dos operadores (hombre y mujer)<br />

ejerciendo los movimientos horizontales, en las instalaciones de la Facultad de Ingeniería<br />

Ensenada de la Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Metodología: Se simuló la jornada<br />

laboral con dos operadores ejerciendo los movimientos horizontales, para ello se realizó el<br />

registro de la temperatura en el área de la muñeca derecha (termógrafo sensorial Sköll), la fuerza<br />

del individuo (dinamómetro de torsión de muñeca Baseline) y los ciclos por minuto, los tres<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 98


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

registros mencionados anteriormente se realizaban cada diez minutos. Resultados: Los<br />

resultados obtenidos fueron los siguientes: en el operador 1, se encontró correlación en los ciclos<br />

por minuto contra temperatura y contra fuerza; además el máximo en: la temperatura fue<br />

35.93°C, la fuerza 82 kg y los ciclos por minuto fue de 138 movimientos y el mínimo en: la<br />

temperatura fue 28.11°C, la fuerza 36 kg y los ciclos por minuto fue de 93 movimientos; en el<br />

operador 2 la correlación que se manifestó fue la de ciclos por minuto contra temperatura;<br />

además el máximo en: la temperatura fue 34.87°C, la fuerza 63 kg y los ciclos por minuto fue de<br />

140 movimientos; y el mínimo en: la temperatura fue 29.38°C, la fuerza 32 kg y los ciclos por<br />

minuto fue de 100 movimientos. Conclusiones: En base a este estudio se concluye que: existe<br />

correlación entre temperatura contra los ciclos por minuto y entre la fuerza contra ciclos por<br />

minuto; asimismo que no existe correlación entre temperatura y fuerza.<br />

Palabras clave: Temperatura, Fuerza, Ciclos por minuto.<br />

ABSTRACT. The need to protect workers against the causes of occupational diseases and accidents<br />

is a no doubt question. Hence the interest to analyze the behavior with variables in temperature in<br />

the area of the wrist, strength and cycles per minute, that to perform horizontal repetitive<br />

movements of the wrist, which are commonly found in workplaces. Objective: The objective was to<br />

correlate the variables of temperature, strength and number of movements per minute when working<br />

with horizontal repetitive movement of the right hand wrist area. Delimitation of the problem: It was<br />

simulated a working day of 8 hours with 2 operators (man and women) exerting horizontal<br />

movements, on the installations of the Faculty of Engineering Ensenada of the Autonomous<br />

University of Baja California. Methodology: It was simulated a working day with two operators<br />

exerting horizontal movements, and for this making the temperature recorder in the area of the<br />

right hand wrist (sensorial thermograph Sköll), the strength of the operator (dynamometer wrist-<br />

twisting Baseline) and cycles per minute, the three mentioned records were made every ten<br />

minutes. Results: The obtained results were: in the operator 1 ,there was a correlation in cycles<br />

per minute against temperature and against strength, besides the maximum in: temperature was<br />

35.93°C, strength was 82 kg and cycles per minute was 138 movements and the minimum in:<br />

temperature was 28.11°C, strength was 36 kg and cycles per minute was 93 movements; in the<br />

operator 2: there was a correlation in cycles per minute, besides the maximum in: temperature<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 99


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

was 34.87°C, strength was 63 kg and cycles per minute was 140 movements and the minimum in:<br />

temperature was 29.38°C, strength was 32 kg and cycles per minute was 100 movements.<br />

Conclusion: On based on this study the conclusion was: correlation exists between temperature<br />

against cycles per minute and strength against cycles per minute; and there is no correlation<br />

between temperature and strength.<br />

Keywords: Temperature, Strength, Cycles per minute.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The need to protect workers against the causes of occupational diseases and accidents is a<br />

question no doubt. All sources of work should carry out activities aimed at the prevention of<br />

occupational hazards, with consequent advantages in production and productivity, achieving<br />

greater social welfare, which is reflected in the economy of the company. The ergonomic<br />

approach is to design products and work to adapt them to the people and not vice versa. The logic<br />

that uses the ergonomics is based on the principle that people are more important than the<br />

objects or production processes; and therefore, cases where it arises any conflict of interest<br />

between people and things, should prevail people (Tortosa et al., 1999).<br />

Ergonomic hazards have been an issue to consider, for injuries caused to workers in work areas.<br />

For industry it is always important the health of the workers, because by avoiding the DTA's in it<br />

reduces their costs for disabilities, absenteeism and more importantly for investors.<br />

Musculoskeletal injuries are disorders characterized by an abnormal condition of muscle, tendons,<br />

nerves, vessels, joints, bones or ligaments, which results in impairment of motor or sensory<br />

function caused by exposure to risk factors: repetition, strength, inappropriate postures, contact<br />

stress and vibration (Sinclair, 2001). For example, some of the injuries and illnesses common in<br />

the wrist area causing repetitive or poorly designed work are:<br />

• Tenosynovitis: is an inflammation of the synovial capsule, this is the sheath that covers<br />

tendons. Tenosynovitis can occur in any tendon with a synovial sheath. However, most often<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 100


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

occurs in the hand, wrist or foot. Most cases of tenosynovitis are caused by injury, infection,<br />

twisting, repetitive movement as: operate a computer, working on an assembly line, the cashier of<br />

a bank, sewing, playing musical instruments like violin or guitar<br />

(http://nlmnih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001242.htm)<br />

• Ganglia: it is a cyst in a joint or tendon sheath, usually in the back of the hand or wrist.<br />

(http://www.itcilo.it/actrav/osh_es/módulos/ergo/ergoa.htm)<br />

• Epicondylitis: is an inflammation of muscle attachments at the epicondyle of the elbow, the<br />

pain may appear in the muscles of the forearm and wrist. The causes that provoke are: Task force<br />

loading and repeatability, often in stressful jobs such as carpentry, plastering or bricklaying.<br />

(http://www.tiroriojano.com/lesiones/EPICONDILITIS.htm)<br />

• Crimping finger: is an inflammation of the tendons and / or tendon sheaths of the fingers.<br />

By use of air guns or staplers (International Labor Organization, 2004).<br />

• Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: presented by the type of horizontal repetitive movement and the<br />

disease that affects people. It is a Repetitive Strain Injury better documented, currently classified<br />

as compensable occupational disease in many countries. This syndrome affects the median nerve<br />

(one of the principal nerve in the wrist). Extreme cases can lead to permanent disability due to the<br />

absolute inability to flex the wrist to perform tasks as simple as operating a computer or holding an<br />

object in the hand. Affects workers who process meat or poultry, supermarket cashiers who use<br />

electronic scanners, the use of vibrating hand tools.<br />

In the United States with this syndrome each worker loses more than 30 working days, a figure<br />

higher than absenteeism from amputations and fractures. It has been estimated annual cost of<br />

these lesions in more than 100 million dollars (International Labor Organization, 2004).<br />

These injuries and illnesses caused by workplace tools and poorly designed or inappropriate<br />

usually develop slowly over months or years. However, a worker wills usually signs and symptoms<br />

for a long time to indicate that something is wrong. For example, the worker will be uncomfortable<br />

while doing their work or feel pain in muscles or joints once home after work. You can also have<br />

small muscle twitches for some time. It is important to investigate the problems of this kind,<br />

because what may begin with a mere inconvenience in some cases can end in injury or disease<br />

that severely incapacitated workers.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 101


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Employees often have no choice and are forced to adapt to poorly designed work conditions that<br />

can seriously injure the hands, wrists, joints, back or other body parts. In particular, injuries can<br />

occur due to:<br />

• The repeated use over time vibrating tools and equipment,<br />

• Tools and tasks that require turning the hand movements of the joints, for example the work<br />

performed by many mechanics;<br />

• The application of strength in a forced position;<br />

• The application of excessive pressure on parts of the hand, back, wrists or joints.<br />

All of them will generate absenteeism and each day of absenteeism for health reasons is a cost. A<br />

day lost disability implies a direct cost and indirect. (Beevis, 2003; Derango, 2002; Hendrick,<br />

2003).<br />

This study aims to correlate the variables of temperature, strength and cycles per minute all this<br />

by repetitive horizontal movements, applied to a man and a woman which are commonly found in<br />

workplaces.<br />

The benefit of this study is that it will have social impact, economic and scientific:<br />

• The social impact, achieving avoid injury to the worker and it will be productive in your work area<br />

and have better social welfare.<br />

• The economic impact, because if the DTA's are avoided in work areas will reduce annual costs<br />

by the company.<br />

• The scientific impact, because it is a sensorial thermography technique actually not used.<br />

1.1 Related Articles<br />

Gold et. al., (2004) in the article entitled "Infrared Thermography for Examination of skin<br />

temperature in the dorsal hand office workers", identified differences between skin temperatures<br />

between 3 groups of office workers through dynamic thermography, we have the experiment when<br />

writing computer keyboard for 9 minutes at a time. It highlights the temperature of testing room as<br />

an important factor.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 102


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Ming, et. al., (2005) in the article entitled "Sympathetic pathology evidence by hand thermal<br />

anomalies in carpal tunnel syndrome", the aim of this study was to classify the pathology<br />

compassionate in carpal tunnel syndrome and the use of infrared thermography. Exercise was<br />

conducted in which subjects were kept at room temperature between 22 and 25˚C for 15 minutes<br />

at room temperature are highlighted in the testing room as an important factor.<br />

Zontak, et. al., (1998) in the article entitled "Dynamic Thermography: Analysis of hand<br />

temperature During exercise", the aim of this study was to characterize the effect of exercise and<br />

responses in the skin temperatures due to controlled levels of exercise temperature conditions,<br />

making a ergonomics bicycle.<br />

Tchou, et. al., (1991) in the article entitled "Thermographic observations in unilateral carpal tunnel<br />

syndrome: Report of 61 cases", its purpose was to characterize the effect of exercise and<br />

responses in the skin temperatures, as an exercise the balance of hands for 15.<br />

Kyeong-Seop, et. al., (2006) in the article entitled "Infrared Thermography in Human Hand"<br />

estimated temperature conditions that could cause mental stress. Dipping both hands in a<br />

container of water at a temperature of 3˚C.<br />

Ferreira, et. al., (2007) in the article titled "Exercise-Associated Thermographic Changes in Young<br />

and Elderly Subjects", determined thermographic temperature changes associated in elderly and<br />

young people, doing knee bends with a weight of 1 kilogram added to the same for 3 minutes.<br />

This study presents the following objectives:<br />

2. OBJECTIVE<br />

• To correlate the variables of temperature, strength and number of movements per minute when<br />

working with horizontal repetitive movement of the right hand wrist area.<br />

• To show the application of sensorial thermography.<br />

• To develop preliminary test emulating a manufacturing industry repetitive operation.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 103


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

3. METHODOLOGY<br />

This study was performed at the facilities of the Autonomous University of Baja California from 5<br />

to September 11, 2009. The study involved a man and a woman using the dominant hand (both<br />

being right-handed), which are healthy people with age 24 being the average age of the<br />

economically active population, students in undergraduate and in unskilled industrial manual<br />

material handling.<br />

To achieve the objective of this study, was simulated eight-hour workday to exercise horizontal<br />

repetitive movements as shown in Figure 1.<br />

Figure 1: Horizontal repetitive movement<br />

The record was made to register the temperature in the area of the wrist with a sensorial<br />

thermograph Sköll for each operator placed at the height of the wrist in the right hand figure 2, the<br />

strength of the individual with a dynamometer wrist-twisting Baseline (Figure 3) and cycles per<br />

minute.<br />

Figure 2: Sensorial Thermograph Sköll<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 104


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 3: Dynamometer wrist-twisting Baseline<br />

It is noteworthy that the three records mentioned above were made with a timer (Figure 4) every<br />

ten minutes.<br />

Figure 4: Timer<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

The table 1 and 2 are shown in the data from the experiment with horizontal repetitive movement<br />

of the operator 1 and the operator 2 within 7 days. In the second line of the both tables: 1 means<br />

cycles per minute, 2 means strength and 3 means temperature.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 105


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 1. Data concentrate of the operator 1 in the 7 days.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 106


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 2. Data Concentrate of the operator 2 in the 7 days.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 107


4.1 Analysis of correlation.<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

In the figure 1 is shown the correlation between temperature and strength in the 7 days, where r is<br />

0.041. As r is 0.041 and 0.119 which is lower than the critical value we conclude that H0 is not<br />

rejected as there is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear correlation.<br />

Figure 1: Correlation between Temperature (°C) and<br />

Strength (Kg) of the operator 1 in the 7 days.<br />

In the figure 2 is shown the correlation between cycles per minute and temperature in the 7<br />

days, where r is 0.292. As r is 0.292 and 0.119 which is greater than the critical value we conclude<br />

that there is a significant linear correlation, and H0 is rejected.<br />

Figure 2: Correlation between cycles per minute and<br />

temperature (°C) of the operator 1 in the 7 days.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 108


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

In the figure 3 is shown the correlation between cycles per minute and Power in the 7 days, with r<br />

of 0.266. As r is 0.266 and 0.119 which is greater than the critical value we conclude that there is<br />

a significant linear correlation, and H0 is rejected.<br />

Figure 3: Correlation between cycles per minute and<br />

strength (Kg) of the operator 1 in the 7 days.<br />

The table 3 is shown the results obtained from the variables of the operator 1 in the 7 days.<br />

Table 3: Results of the Operator 1 variables in the 7 days.<br />

The table 4 is shown the maximum and minimum values of the variables of temperature, strength<br />

and cycles per minute generated by day to perform horizontal repetitive movement of the operator<br />

1.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 109


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 4: Results of the operation range of the operator 1 per day.<br />

In the figure 4 is shown the correlation between temperature and strength in the 7 days, being r -<br />

0.072. As r is -0.072 and 0.119 which is lower than the critical value we conclude that H0 is not<br />

rejected as there is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear correlation.<br />

Figure 4: Correlation between Temperature (°C) and<br />

Strength (Kg) of the operator 2 in the 7days.<br />

In the figure 5 is shown the correlation between cycles per minute and temperature in the 7 days,<br />

with r -0.172. As r is -0.172 and its absolute value is 0.172 and 0.119 which is greater than the<br />

critical value we conclude that there is a significant linear correlation, and H0 is rejected.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 110


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 5: Correlation between cycles per minute and<br />

temperature (°C) of the operator 2 in the 7 days.<br />

In the figure 6 is shown the correlation between cycles per minute and Strength in the 7 days,<br />

being r -0.002 As r -0.002. and 0.119 which is lower than the critical value we conclude that H0 is<br />

not rejected as there is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear<br />

correlation.<br />

Figure 6: Correlation between cycles per minute and<br />

Strength (Kg) of the operator 2 in the 7 days.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 111


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The table 5 is shown the results obtained from the operator 2 variables in the 7 days.<br />

Table 5: Results of the operator 2 variables in the 7 days.<br />

The table 6 is shown the maximum and minimum values of the variables of temperature, strength and<br />

cycles per minute generated by day to perform horizontal repetitive movement in the operator 2.<br />

Table 6: Results of the operating range of the operator 2 per day.<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

In the present study fulfilled the objective of correlating the variables temperature, strength, and<br />

cycles per minute that are manifested in the wrist area of the dominant hand (in this case the<br />

operators was the right hand) with horizontal repetitive movements during working day within a<br />

week.<br />

On based on this study the results were as follows: the operator 1 ,there was a correlation in<br />

cycles per minute against temperature and against strength, besides the maximum in:<br />

temperature was 35.93°C, strength was 82 kg and cycles per minute was 138 movements and the<br />

minimum in: temperature was 28.11°C, strength was 36 kg and cycles per minute was 93<br />

movements; the operator 2: there was a correlation in cycles per minute, besides the maximum in:<br />

temperature was 34.87°C, strength was 63 kg and cycles per minute was 140 movements and the<br />

minimum in: temperature was 29.38°C, strength was 32 kg and cycles per minute was 100<br />

movements.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 112


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The conclusion was: correlation exists between temperature against cycles per minute and<br />

strength against cycles per minute; and there is no correlation between temperature and strength.<br />

6. REFERENCES<br />

Beevis, D., (2003). Ergonomics-Costs and Benefits Revisited. Applied Ergonomics 34: 491-496.<br />

Derango, K. and Franzini, L., (2002). Economic Evaluations of Workplace Health Interventions:<br />

Theory and Literature Review. In Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology, Ed<br />

Washington D.C. American Psychological Association.<br />

Ferreira, J., Mendonça, L.C., Nunez, L.A., Andrade, A.C., Rebelatto J.R., and Salvini, T. (2007).<br />

Exercise-Associated Thermographic Changes in Young and Elderly Subjects, Federal<br />

University of Saint Carlos. Physics’ Institute of Saint Carlos, Sao Paulo University, Brazil.<br />

Gold E. J., Cherniack M., Buchholz B., (2004). Infrared Thermography for examination of skin<br />

temperature in the dorsal hand office workers, Eur J. Apply Physiol 93: 245-251.<br />

Hendrick, H.W., (2003). Determining the Cost-Benefits of Ergonomics Projects and Factors that<br />

lead to their Success. Applied Ergonomics 34: 419-427.<br />

International Training Center of the International Labor Organization. ITCILO: Home page.<br />

http://www.itcilo.it/actrav/osh_es/módulos/ergo/ergoa.htm<br />

Kyeong-Seop, K., Shin, S.W., Yoon, T.H., Kim, E.J., Lee, J.W. and Kim, I.Y. (2006). Infrared<br />

Thermography in Human Hand”, School of Biomedical Engineering, Chungju, Korea.<br />

Ming, Z., Zaproudina, N., Siivola, J., Nousiainen, U., Pietikainen S., (2005). Sympathetic<br />

pathology evidenced by hand thermal anomalies in carpal tunnel syndrome, ISP<br />

Pathophysiology: 137-141.<br />

International Labor Organization (2004). Labor Productivity in Latin America, is the same as 20 years<br />

ago, Magazine of occupational panorama of the OIT.<br />

Sinclair, D.T. and Graves, R.J. (2001). Feasibility of Developing a Simple Prototype Decision Aid<br />

for the Initial Medical Assessment of Work Related Upper Limb Disorders. University of<br />

Aberdeen. Department of Environmental & Occupational Medicine. Hse Books.<br />

Shooting Sport Club La Rioja, Shooting Sport Club La Rioja Home page:<br />

http://www.tiroriojano.com/lesiones/EPICONDILITIS.htm<br />

Tchou, S.F., Costich, J.C. Burguess, R., Lexington, K.Y. and Wexler C. (1992). Thermographic<br />

observations in unilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Report of 61 cases, The Journal of the<br />

hand surgery 17A: 631-637.<br />

Tortosa, L. and Garcia, C., Page, A. and Ferreras, A. (1999). Ergonomics and disability. Institute<br />

of Biomechanics of Valencia (IBV), Valencia. ISBN 84-923974-8-9.<br />

U.S. National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health. Medical Encyclopedia: Home<br />

page. http://nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001242.htm<br />

Zontak, A., Sideman, S, Verbitsky, O. and Beyar, R., (1998). Dynamic Thermography: Analysis of<br />

hand temperature, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 26, 988-993.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 113


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Temperature analysis on wrist surface due repetitive movement tasks using<br />

Sensorial Thermography to find out a possible pathology for a CTD<br />

Ordorica Villalvazo Javier 1,2 , Camargo Wilson Claudia 1,2 , De la Vega Bustillos Enrique 3 ,<br />

Olguín Tiznado Jesús E. 1, 2 , López Bonilla Oscar R. 2 , Limón Romero Jorge 1, 2 .<br />

1 Department of Industrial Engineering - Engineering Faculty Ensenada.<br />

Autonomous University of Baja California.<br />

Km. 103 Highway Tijuana-Ensenada S/N<br />

Ensenada, Baja California. 22760<br />

villalvazo@uabc.edu.mx, ccamargo@uabc.edu.mx<br />

2 Division of Posgrade and Research MyDCI- Engineering Faculty Ensenada.<br />

Autonomous University of Baja California.<br />

Km. 103 Highway Tijuana-Ensenada S/N<br />

Ensenada, Baja California. 22760<br />

jeol79@uabc.edu.mx, olopez@uabc.edu.mx, j.limon@uabc.edu.mx<br />

3 Division of Postgraduate Studies and Research.<br />

Technological Institute of Hermosillo.<br />

Technological Avenue S/N<br />

Hermosillo, Sonora. 83170<br />

e_delavega_mx@yahoo.com<br />

Resumen: A través de la historia se puede observar como la temperatura ha sido un indicador<br />

importante para determinar cambios importantes en los ecosistemas del planeta, en la resistencia<br />

de materiales para el diseño de nuevos productos, y también en el campo de la medicina<br />

analizando por ejemplo, fiebres ocasionadas por infecciones provocadas por nuevas<br />

enfermedades. A través de este estudio de las variaciones de temperatura corporales provocadas<br />

en los nervios del área de la muñeca generando la reducción en la habilidad muscular para<br />

realizar el trabajo debido a movimientos repetitivos, lo cual nos puede llevar a entender la<br />

patología de un Desorden de Trauma Acumulado (DTA), tomando en cuenta la termografía<br />

sensorial, ya que no es invasiva para el ser humano, que facilita la recolección y manipulación de<br />

los datos. Objetivos: Analizar cambios en los patrones de temperatura generados en el área de la<br />

muñeca. Mostrar la factibilidad de la aplicación de la termografía sensorial. Recabar información<br />

acerca de las variables no laborales (edad, género, peso, entre otras) y laborales (repetitividad,<br />

temperatura del área de trabajo). Desarrollar las pruebas preliminares emulando la operación<br />

ejecutada en la industria y que involucra los movimientos repetitivos. Identificar los puntos de<br />

estrés máximo alcanzados durante un periodo de operación describiendo síntomas detectados.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 114


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Delimitación del problema: Este estudio se realizó con sólo un estudiante de la Facultad de<br />

Ingeniería Ensenada de la UABC. Metodología: Se seleccionó a un estudiante en condiciones<br />

físicas normales, quien realizó pruebas en un laboratorio aplicando el protocolo para el<br />

experimento haciendo uso de la termografía sensorial. Resultados: Las temperaturas máximas<br />

alcanzadas en ambas muñecas fueron en periodos de operación en tiempos muy similares. Se<br />

detectaron molestias en el hombro derecho en el rango donde se identifican las temperaturas<br />

más altas durante el proceso de la operación para ambas muñecas. A través del ajuste de una<br />

ecuación de tercer orden fue posible explicar el comportamiento de las temperaturas.<br />

Conclusiones: Por medio de la termografía sensorial es posible analizar patrones de temperatura,<br />

ligarlos a una estadística creando la posible patología de un DTA y que pudieran servir en futuras<br />

investigaciones.<br />

Palabras clave: Termografía sensorial, DTA, temperatura.<br />

Abstract: Through history we have observed how temperature has been an important factor to<br />

take in account in order to detect many several climatic changes in planet. This factor has been<br />

deeply studied in weather changes, material resistance for the designing of new products, and<br />

also, in the medicine field obtaining remarkable results studying fiber causes in multiple diseases,<br />

most of them related to infections. This research aimed at evaluating body temperature variations<br />

on wrist surface that can cause muscle disability and weakness due repetitive movement tasks.<br />

The work contributes to discover a possible Cumulative Trauma Disorder (CTD) pathology using<br />

sensorial Thermography as an innovative and dynamic tool, since this is not a non-invasive<br />

technique it means that can not cause any damage on humans. It is a powerful tool also, because<br />

allow investigators to manipulate data and import or export them to statistics programs.<br />

Objectives: Analyze temperature pattern changes and show up the feasibility of the sensorial<br />

thermography. Collect information about different kind of variables that may affect the study, like<br />

age, gender, weight, height, and others like repetitiveness and work area temperature. Perform<br />

preliminary test emulating an operation highly repetitive in the textile industry. Identify maximum<br />

stress points while preliminary test is taking place, and at the same moment detect key symptoms.<br />

Methodology: An Industrial engineering student in good shape was selected to perform the<br />

repetitive task in a lab by following the experiment protocol and using sensorial thermography.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 115


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Results: Maximum temperatures in both wrists were detected in similar periods of time. The<br />

student showed pain symptoms in right shoulder while doing the task. It was detected while the<br />

maximum temperature range was reached in both wrists. By adjusting a third order equation it<br />

was possible to explain the temperature behavior. Conclusions: Through sensorial thermography<br />

is possible to analyze temperature pattern and link them to statistics creating a possible CTD<br />

pathology that could help in future researches.<br />

Keywords: Sensorial thermography, CTD, temperature.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The highly repetitive activities are a disease that in nowadays affect thousands of people<br />

developing several cumulative trauma disorders. In many times this kind of disorders are confused<br />

with other kind of diseases. The cumulative trauma disorders cause damages on body tissues due<br />

to excess motion periods. It can be developed through pass of the time. Furthermore, today, the<br />

DTA’S are well known as an industrial epidemic causing a periodic disability. The experimentation<br />

was based on temperature analysis generated on wrist area of one subject, which is the area<br />

where the carpal tunnel syndrome begins. A repetitive movement simulation consisted in an<br />

operation emulated from a local textile industry. The study was taken using sensorial<br />

thermography.<br />

The thermography is a non invasive technique without biologic hazard. It detects, measures, and<br />

converts invisible, surface body heat into visible display which is the photographed or videotaped<br />

as a permanent record. This type of thermography it is the one we call infrared thermography<br />

(Feldman al., 1991). The digital sensorial thermography it is different from the infrared one,<br />

because it is widely used to look for temperature patterns on skin surface through sensor contact<br />

(Zontak et al., 1998).<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 116


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

This technology was born while the submarine thermographs a long time ago were developed to<br />

measure underwater temperatures. It has many applications such as oceanography, marine<br />

ecology, industry, and many others (Lopez, 1992).<br />

This study arose from three important questions, what is the subject temperature behavior during<br />

the motion? What is the relationship between pain symptoms and temperature data? What are the<br />

max stress points? A close examination of the literature shoes that no study has been devoted to<br />

these problems emulating a motion executed in the textile industry in order to analyze cutaneous<br />

temperatures.<br />

However a swimming study was carried out with a professional swimmer in a pool where the<br />

swimmer practiced several swimming styles, so researchers could analyze the temperatures after<br />

each swimming style (Zaidi et al., 2007).<br />

The Study was carried out in a closed room where the temperature was a relevant parameter. We<br />

use a home heater to try to control the temperature, because according with the literature, the<br />

most useful temperature parameter in experimentations of this kind is between 20 and 25 degrees<br />

(E.Y.K, N.G. et al., 2005).<br />

It is advisable to specify that the present work is not a statistical study. The results obtained in this<br />

study cannot be considered to have a universal character since only one subject was taken into<br />

account for our experimentation. However we are doing many test with more subjects at the<br />

campus to make temperature behavior inferences. The objectives in this preliminary<br />

experimentation were to show the applications of the sensorial thermography on one hand, and on<br />

the other hand, to show the maximum temperature stress points.<br />

This Study presents the following objectives:<br />

2. OBJETIVES<br />

• To analyze temperature pattern changes generated on wrist area.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 117


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

• To show the application of sensorial thermography.<br />

• To collect information about subject gender, age, mass and others.<br />

• To collect information about repetitive cycles and temperature working area.<br />

• To develop preliminary test emulating a textile industry repetitive operation.<br />

• To identify maximum stress points during the operation period and to describe symptoms<br />

detected.<br />

3.1 The subject<br />

3. METHODOLOGHY<br />

The subject taking in part in this study is a subject in good shape. The principal anthropometric<br />

characteristics of the subject are summarized in table 1.<br />

Table 1. Anthropometric data for the subject<br />

Age Height<br />

Mass<br />

(m)<br />

(Kg)<br />

Subject 29 1.63 60<br />

3.2 Equipment and data analysis<br />

All the cutaneous temperatures were taken using a sensorial thermograph Sköll with a<br />

temperature range of 0˚C – 40˚C, a precision of ±.3˚C, and a resolution of 1 degree, a<br />

microporous tape (Lopez, 1992), a laptop (COMPAQ Intel Pentium Dual Core), a home heater.<br />

Programming the thermographs was possible using a program called Akela. Also a statistical<br />

program was used for data analysis (Minitab 15) and Microsoft Excel 2007.<br />

3.3 Protocol<br />

Subjects were asked to refrain from intense exercise, caffeine, smoking, alcohol and smoking for<br />

20 minutes prior to the experiment (Gold et al., 2004) and (Gold et al., 2009) because smoking<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 118


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

could produce a massive reduction of body temperature and alcohol a raise of body temperature.<br />

Previous studies have demonstrated that the corporal temperature stabilization takes about 20<br />

minutes due to a reduction on body metabolism (E.Y.K NG y Sim en E.Y.NG et al., 2008).<br />

Having the opportunity to use a home heater we warmed up the room temperature for the<br />

experiment between 20-25 degrees (E.Y.K NG et al., 2005), Once we warmed up the room, the<br />

participant was seated in an ergonomic chair with arm rest and then stick the sensorial<br />

thermographs in both wrist, close to the median nerve region. After that, the subject was asked to<br />

rest both arms in a flatbed at the ribs height (Kroemer et al., 2001) for about twenty minutes. The<br />

next step in the experiment protocol was to simulate a highly repetitive operation executed in the<br />

textile industry for about 3.5 hours, this period of time representing the longest period of the<br />

workday. The operation involved several movements like reach, take, place and many others.<br />

Several pain symptoms were identified during the experiment. Finally, the sensor thermographs<br />

were removed from both wrist and then analyze the results.<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

The results of all pain symptoms detected during the experiment developed are shown in table 2.<br />

These anomalies were given off by the subject while he was doing the repetitive task. It was so<br />

important to write down the hour, minute and second, so we could link this info to the<br />

temperatures.<br />

Preliminary<br />

1<br />

Preliminary<br />

2<br />

Preliminary<br />

3<br />

Preliminary<br />

4<br />

Table 2. Anomalies detected in the operator<br />

Right<br />

shoulder<br />

pain<br />

x<br />

Left<br />

shoulder<br />

pain<br />

Lower<br />

back<br />

pain<br />

Upper<br />

back<br />

pain<br />

Right<br />

wrist<br />

pain<br />

x x x x x<br />

x x<br />

x x x x<br />

Right<br />

palm<br />

pain<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 119


4.1 Preliminary test 1<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The corresponding temperature behavior is shown in Figure 1 and 2. If we compare both figures<br />

we can see that both temperature behaviors in both wrists are very but very similar. Three similar<br />

characteristics were identified as a result:<br />

• The temperatures in both writs (maximum stress points) were 33.44˚C and 32.921˚C, and were<br />

reached at similar periods of time, 11:41:14 and 11:49:28 (h:m:s).<br />

• The anomalies in right shoulder started to being shown by the person at the range where were<br />

the highest temperature levels, while doing the operation using both wrists.<br />

• The most aggressive projection of the temperature was approximately at 11:30 and 12:00 in<br />

both wrists.<br />

In both cases the subject beated the pain symptoms on right shoulder, this happened when the<br />

most aggressive projection began to appear, approximately at 11:40. Then at the same time the<br />

temperature projection became less aggressive and began a tendency of decrease.<br />

On the other hand, by adjusting a third order equation it was possible to explain the temperatures<br />

of the person with a coefficient of determination of 91.1% for the left hand wrist and 87.7% for the<br />

right hand wrist.<br />

Figure 1. Adjustment of the curve of left hand wrist<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 120


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 2. Adjustment of the curve of right hand wrist<br />

4.2 Preliminary test 2<br />

The corresponding temperature behavior is shown in Figure 3 and 4. If we compare both figures<br />

we can see that both temperature behaviors in both wrists are very similar has shown in the<br />

previous preliminary test. The maximum time of stress of the hands was to similar one from each<br />

other, and based on this we could say the following important points:<br />

The maximum stress points were reached in similar times in both wrists. On left hand wrist at<br />

12:48:24 and the temperature was 34.276˚C and on right hand wrist was 12:48:39 and the<br />

temperature was 34.154˚C. Factors like temperature and time were similar.<br />

Many anomalies were detected on right wrist around 12:33:30 and after one hour on right<br />

palm, and at the same time on lower back.<br />

Anomalies on right shoulder were detected when the maximum temperature stress point was<br />

reached.<br />

On the other hand it was possible to adjust a polinomial third order equation that represents the<br />

subject temperature behavior and as a result a coefficient of determination of 80.5% for the left<br />

hand wrist and 86.8% for right hand wrist.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 121


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 3. Adjustment of the curve of left hand wrist<br />

Figure 4. Adjustment of the curve of right hand wrist<br />

4.3 Preliminary test 3<br />

The corresponding temperature behavior is shown in Figure 5 and 6. If we compare both figures<br />

we can see that both temperature behaviors in both wrists are very similar has shown in the<br />

previous preliminary test and. The maximum time of stress of the hands was similar one from<br />

each other, and based on this we could say the following important points:<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 122


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The maximum stress points were reached in similar times in both wrists. On left hand wrist<br />

at 14:11:40 and the temperature was 33.481˚C and on right hand wrist was 14:13:22 and<br />

the temperature was 33.313 ˚C. Factors like temperature and time were similar.<br />

A lower back pain was identified around 12:55:35 and close to the end of the<br />

experimentation a pain on right hand wrist around 14:54:10.<br />

Anomalies on right shoulder were detected when the maximum temperature stress point<br />

was reached.<br />

On the other hand it was possible to adjust a polinomial third order equation that represents the<br />

subject temperature behavior and as a result a coefficient of determination of 90.8% for the left<br />

hand wrist and 94.5% for right hand wrist.<br />

Figure 5. Adjustment of the curve of left hand wrist<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 123


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 6. Adjustment of the curve of right hand wrist<br />

4.4 Preliminary test 4<br />

The corresponding temperature behavior is shown in Figure 7 and 8. If we compare both figures<br />

we can see that both temperature behaviors in both wrists are similar has shown in the previous<br />

preliminary test and. The maximum time of stress of the hands was to similar one from each other,<br />

and based on this we could say the following important points:<br />

The maximum stress points were reached in similar times in both wrists. On left hand wrist<br />

at 12:52:14 and the temperature was 33.686˚C and on right hand wrist was 13:03:53 and<br />

the temperature was 33.114˚C. Factors like temperature and time were similar.<br />

A lower back pain was identified around 12:55:35 and close to the end of the<br />

experimentation a pain on right hand wrist around 14:54:10.<br />

Anomalies on right shoulder were detected during the period when the temperature began<br />

to decrease around 13:42:52. Also a pain on right palm was identified around 14:13:43.<br />

At the end of the test a pain on left shoulder was identified around 3:52:40 and also the<br />

pain on right shoulder increased in a several way, this occurred around 3:56:36.<br />

On the other hand it was possible to adjust a polinomial third order equation that represents<br />

the subject temperature behavior and as a result a coefficient of determination of 97.3% for<br />

the left hand wrist and 95.6% for right hand wrist.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 124


4.5 Averages<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 7. Adjustment of the curve of left hand wrist<br />

Figure 8. Adjustment of the curve of right hand wrist<br />

Taking in account the maximum temperatures reached in the experiment stress points of all the<br />

preliminary test of both hand wrists, we obtained averages for each hand wrist, and the equation 1<br />

shows how to calculate the averages:<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 125


y<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

i=<br />

= 1<br />

n<br />

y<br />

i<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

We found out, and based on having similar temperature patterns and stress point periods that<br />

averages were similar too. The average temperature for left hand wrist was y = 33.<br />

72 ˚C and<br />

y = 33.<br />

38˚C<br />

for the right hand wrist.<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

A preliminary experimental test was undertaken on one hand, for studying the feasibility of using<br />

sensorial thermography on the analysis of repetitive tasks, and on the other hand to identify the<br />

maximum stress point, behavior and temperature patterns as a result of the activity. In particular,<br />

this study shows that the use of the sensorial thermography is appropriate in order to detect<br />

temperature patterns. It is remarkable to mention that in all the test the temperature patterns were<br />

very similar in both hand wrists, independently of the dominant hand of the subject. The<br />

temperature patters were similar for all the tests, but changing its behavior during the days. The<br />

same conditions were taking in account for the entire tests, including the room temperature as the<br />

main element.<br />

On the other hand it was possible to adjust a polinomial third order equation for each test that<br />

represents the subject temperature data behavior and as a result a coefficient of determination to<br />

represent the level of the curve adjustment to data.<br />

6. RECOMENDATIONS<br />

One should recall to this conclusions cannot be considered as universal as far as only one<br />

subject, a subject in good shape, took part in this study. Nevertheless, the conclusions make us<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 126<br />

(1)


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

think of considering a statistical study taking in part more subjects (men and women), to verify if<br />

the temperature patters of several subjects are linked in same way.<br />

7. REFERENCES<br />

E.Y.K, N.G. and E.C., K.E.E., (2008). Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer<br />

Thermography, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, Vol. 32, 103-114.<br />

Feldman, F., (1991). Thermography of the hand and wrist: Practical applications, Hand Clinics,<br />

Vol. 7, No.1.<br />

Gold, J., Cherniack, M., Hanlon, A., Dennerlein, T., Dropkin, J., (2009). Skin temperature in<br />

dorsal hand of office workers and severity of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders, Int.<br />

Arch. Occup. Envior. Health, 82: 1281-1292.<br />

Gold, J., Cherniack, M., Buchholz, B., (2004). Infrared Thermography for examination of skin<br />

temperature in the dorsal hand office workers, Eur J. Apply Physiol 93: 245-251.<br />

Kroemer, E., Kroemer, H., Kroemer. K., (2001). “Ergonomics: How to design for ease and<br />

efficiency”, second edition, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-725478-1, 97-113.<br />

Lopez, R., (1992). Oceanologic Research Institute, Autonomous University of Baja California.<br />

Submarine digital thermograph, Develop and instrumentation, Vol. 3 No.2, 1992<br />

Puig A.A., (1993). Smoking influence in the variations of biochemical, physiological and<br />

performance parameters, Barcelona, Spain.<br />

Zaidi H., TaÏar R., Fohanno S., Polidori G., (2007). The influence of swimming type on the skintemperature<br />

maps of a competitive swimmer from infrared Thermography, Acta of<br />

Bioengineering and Biomechanics, Vol. 9, No.1.<br />

Zontak Alla, Sideman Samuel, Verbitsky Oleg, Beyar Rafael, (1998). Dynamic Thermography:<br />

Analysis of hand temperature, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 26, 988-993.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 127


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

VIBRATION STUDY TO IMPROVE STRIPPING OPERATION<br />

IN A LITOGRAPHICS COMPANY<br />

Mario Ramírez Barrera ¹, Jorge Valenzuela Corral ¹<br />

Athenea Núñez Sifuentes ˚<br />

¹ Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Department<br />

˚ Student from Institute of Engineering and Technology<br />

Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez<br />

mramirez@uacj.mx , jvalenzu@uacj.mx<br />

vain8109@gmail.com<br />

RESUMEN: En una empresa dedicada a la impresión y elaboración de cajas y precisamente en<br />

la operación de striping. o desbarbe que es donde se cortan los excesos o sobrantes de las cajas<br />

después del proceso de sauje (marcado o preformando por medio de prensas), nos encontramos<br />

que en esta operación los trabajadores se encuentran expuestos a los mas importantes factores<br />

de riesgo ocupacional como son frecuencia, esfuerzo energético y mala postura, pero sobre todo<br />

a una sobreexposición de vibración producida por un roto martillo neumático utilizado para quitar<br />

el cartón sobrante o la rebaba de las cajas durante la operación de striping, y es por esto que en<br />

esta investigación se analizo el uso de dicha herramienta y se vio que al utilizar un aislante<br />

adecuado en el mango del roto martillo neumático y los guantes ergonómicos anitimpacto y<br />

antivibración en vez de los de algodón que actualmente proporciona la empresa se reduce al<br />

máximo el estrés de trabajo producido por la vibración, así como también al utilizar el equipo de<br />

protección personal consistente en tapones auditivos, mascarillas y zapatos de seguridad se<br />

mejora considerablemente el entorno del operador y así se podrá reducir considerablemente el<br />

riesgo de adquirir una enfermedad profesional generada por el tipo de trabajo requerido por el<br />

proceso de fabricación del producto.<br />

Palabras Clave: Vibracion, Equipo de protecion personal.<br />

ABSTRACT:The comparative study was made in a company dedicated to fabricate and print<br />

carton boxes. After the carton press forming process there is an operation that removes carton<br />

excess and leftovers which was found that workers are exposed to an occupational risk<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 128


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

conditions like frequency, body stress and bad postures besides of an overexposure vibrations<br />

condition originated from a pneumatic roto-hammer utilized to remove carton leftovers during the<br />

stripping operation , and that is why this investigation was focused in the use of this pneumatic<br />

tool. After a close analisys of the situation it was found that by adding the proper insulation to the<br />

tool handle and by using anti-impact / anti-vibration ergonomic gloves instead of the normal cotton<br />

gloves provided by the company, the stress condition due to the tool vibrations was drastically<br />

reduced, in addition to this the personal protection equipment was improved by utilizing ear plugs,<br />

mask and safety shoes, and as a result of these actions the work environment conditions were<br />

improved thus reducing the probability of getting a body trauma due to the fabrication process<br />

needs.<br />

Key words: Vibrations, Personnel Protection Equipment.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

After the carton Fabrication and Printing process there is a stripping operation which consists of<br />

two steps: carton preforming by utilizing a pneumatic roto-hammer and manual removal of<br />

leftovers from cartons located on pallets, figures 1.1 and 1.2 below show the fabrication process<br />

sequence.<br />

Figure 1.1 Preforming of boxes using Figure 1.2 Manual carton leftovers<br />

the pneumatic roto- hammer removal.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 129


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

In the operation mentioned above it was found that the workers were exposed to significant<br />

occupational risk conditions such as frequency, body stress and anti-ergonomic postures and also<br />

an overexposure to vibrations for extended periods of time affecting arms and hands due to the<br />

use of this roto-hammer tool, the workers were just using normal cotton gloves, also a survey was<br />

made finding that workers suffer from chronic back ache, weakness sensation of hand grasping<br />

ability known as Accumulative Trauma Disorder (ATD) in tendons and nerves which was<br />

developed due to this working condition for an extended period of time.<br />

2. INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY<br />

Investigating carefully to get the proper analyzing data in order to improve this workstation, a<br />

Vibrations meter was used ( Bruel & kkjaer”s model vibrotest 60 shown in figure 2.1 ). Vibrations<br />

readings were taken using just regular cotton gloves as shown in figure 2.2 to make the<br />

comparisson against utilizing anti-impact / anti-vibrations ergonomic gloves and also an insulator<br />

material was installed on the roto-hammer handle to help improving this situation. Finally the<br />

readings were taken on both conditions and they are shown on the following tables .<br />

Figure 2.1 Vibrations Analyzer Figure 2.2 Vibrations readings taken at<br />

Utilized in the study Stripping work station.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 130


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The data was carefully analyzed and charts were obtained to compare before and after conditions<br />

(1 µm = .001 mm = 1 x 10 ¯³ mm measuring units were used ) , without cotton gloves, with cotton<br />

gloves, with anti-impact / anti-vibtations gloves and last the insulation on the tool handle.was<br />

added. Chart figure 2.3 shows this data.<br />

Figure 2.3 This chart shows the average of vibration readings using this analyzer . without gloves<br />

(blue), with cotton gloves (purple), With ergonomic gloves (green), with both ergonomic gloves<br />

and handle insulation (red).<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 131


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 132


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 133


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

3. RESULTS<br />

Based on the detailed ergonomic analysis made and considering the vibrations condition that the<br />

regular worker is exposed to during extended periods of time , It is strongly recommended to redesign<br />

and relocate this work station to make it safer and easier to handle the material used , and<br />

also it is suggested to break-down this operation in two steps physically separated from each<br />

other (pre forming and manual leftovers removal as shown in figure 3.1) in order to rotate<br />

operators every two hours in each step of the operation , place an anti-fatigue floor mat and at the<br />

same time insulating the handle of the roto-hammer pneumatic tool ( figure 3.2) and also utilizing<br />

anti-vibrations / anti-impact ergonomic cotton gloves / spandex and with akton material on the<br />

hand palm area to reduce the vibrations impact (figure 3.3), in addition to that , safety shoes with<br />

steel must be used at all times , as well ear plugs, and mouth mask to avoid contact with the<br />

carton dusts.<br />

. BEFORE AFTER<br />

ANTES<br />

<strong>DE</strong>SPUES<br />

Figure 3.1 Layout of the stripping operation before and after the improvement showing the<br />

operation separated in two steps and physically separated also.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 134


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 3.2 Insulation of tool handle Figure 3.3 Anti-vibration/impact gloves<br />

4. CONCLUSIONS<br />

The level of vibration due to the use of certain tools can be reduced to avoid a higher<br />

damage to the human body by taking several actions like rotation of workers (Administrative<br />

controls) more often , proper maintenance of tools to prevent malfunctioning, Installation of<br />

anti fatigue floor mats to isolate vibrations from human body,Anti-vibration devices like<br />

plastics or foams adapted to the tools or machines (Engineering controls). And also the use<br />

of personnel protection equipment like anti-vibration / anti-impact gloves. The lesson learned<br />

from this study , most important from all this, is to change or improve Company’s safety<br />

practices culture to protect workers by meeting Official Mexican Safety Norms (nom 017 and<br />

nom 024) at the workplace, and to train , and implement awareness programs aim to<br />

employees through visual and verbal communications medias to make them aware of the<br />

possible body damage due to long exposure of vibration conditions resulting in possible<br />

traumas. (Human administrative controls).*<br />

* Mario Ramirez Barrera (UACJ 2010)<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 135


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

5. BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

• Asfahl C ,R. Industrial Safety and Health managment ( 1995) 3ª Edition<br />

editorial Prentice Hall.<br />

• Bailey R. Human Performance Engineering. ( 1989) Prentice Hall.<br />

• International Organization for Standarization (2004) ISO 2631.5.2004 Mechanical vibration<br />

- Evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration. ISO Switzerland<br />

• Normas Oficiales Mexicanas ( nom 017 y nom 024)<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 136


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

A Descriptive Study about the Integration of Ergonomic Attributes on the<br />

Selection of Advanced Manufacturing Technology -AMT-<br />

Aidé Maldonado Macías 1, 2 , Arturo Reallyvázquez 1 , Guadalupe Ramírez 1 , Jorge Garcia-<br />

Alcaraz 1 , Salvador Noriega 1<br />

1 Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering<br />

Ciudad Juárez Autonomous University<br />

Ave. del Charro 450 Norte, C.P. 32310<br />

Cd. Juárez, Chihuahua, México<br />

amaldona@uacj.mx<br />

2 Division of Graduate Studies and Research<br />

Ciudad Juárez Institute of Technology<br />

Ave. Tecnológico No. 4090<br />

Cd. Juárez, Chihuahua, México<br />

Resumen: Este artículo presenta un estudio descriptivo sobre la integración de la Ergonomía de<br />

compatibilidad de atributos (ECA) en la selección de la Tecnologia de Manufactura Avanzada<br />

(TMA) entre 30 personas que toman decisiones (TD) de las empresas del sector metal-mecánico<br />

situado en la zona fronteriza de Ciudad Juárez, México. La intención es aumentar el conocimiento<br />

sobre la consideración e importancia de los atributos ergonómicos en la adquisición de TMA.<br />

Además, fueron investigadas algunas de las características del personal que participa en su<br />

funcionamiento, la gestión y la toma de decisiones. Adicionalmente, se identificaron los<br />

procedimientos comunes de evaluación y selección de TMA; se da una clasificación de los<br />

equipos utilizados en estas empresas de acuerdo con el propósito de manufactura.<br />

La metodología expone la ECA en un modelo de atributos múltiples y describe la ECA aplicada<br />

para recabar información sobre las características de la selección de la TMA, selección de<br />

proocesos utilizados en estas empresas. Los resultados muestran que la mayoría de las<br />

empresas realizan algún tipo de diagnóstico para la selección de AMT, pero frecuentemente se<br />

omiten o descuidan los atributos ergonómicos. Sin embargo, los TM reconocen que al tomar en<br />

consideracion los atributos ergonomicos en la selección de TMA puede proporcionar una ventaja<br />

estratégica al facilitar y promover condiciones operativas más seguras en estos lugares de trabajo<br />

y lograr una mejor aplicación de esta tecnología también. Asimismo, los resultados indican que es<br />

casi tan frecuente encontrar en estas empresas la tecnología CNC como la tecnología tradicional<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 137


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

y una tendencia cada vez mayor para incrementar las inversiones en tecnología de robots y<br />

prototipado rápido. Además, el genero masculino es predominante en el personal operativo y<br />

administrativo relacionado con TMA y el personal operativo promedia una antigüedad en un rango<br />

de 4-7 años.<br />

Palabras clave: Ergonomia de Compativilidad de Atributos, Tecnología de Manufactura<br />

Avanzada, Toma de Decisiones, Encuesta de compatibilidad ergonómico para TMA<br />

Abstract: This paper presents a descriptive study about the integration of Ergonomic<br />

Compatibility Attributes (ECA) on the selection of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT)<br />

among 30 Decision Makers (DM) from enterprises of the metal-mechanical sector located in the<br />

borderland of Juarez City, Mexico. It is meant to increase knowledge about the consideration and<br />

importance of ergonomic attributes on the acquisition of Advanced Manufacturing Technology<br />

(AMT). Also, some characteristics of the personnel involved in its operation, management and the<br />

decision making processes were investigated. Additionally, common procedures for evaluation<br />

and selection of AMT were identified; a classification of the equipment used in these companies is<br />

provided according to the manufacturing purpose.<br />

The methodology exposes the ECA in a multi-attribute model and describes the Ergonomic<br />

Compatibility Survey (ECS) applied for gather information about the characteristics of the AMT<br />

selection processes used in these companies. The results show that most of the companies do<br />

perform some kind of diagnosis for AMT selection, but ergonomic attributes are often omitted or<br />

neglected among them. However, DM recognize that ergonomic attributes consideration in AMT<br />

selection may provide a strategic advantage in the way it would facilitate and promote safer<br />

operative conditions in these workplaces, and a more successful implementation of this<br />

technology as well. Also, results explain that CNC technology is almost as frequent to find in these<br />

companies as traditional technology and a growing trend to increment the investments in rapid<br />

prototyping technology and robots can be observed. Additionally, male gender is predominant in<br />

the operative and management personnel related with AMT and operative personnel average<br />

seniority is in a range of 4-7years.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 138


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Keywords: Ergonomic Compatibility Attributes, Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Decision<br />

Making Processes, Ergonomic Compatibility Survey for AMT.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

This section presents the problem description, the objectives of this investigation and finally the<br />

justification and the scope.<br />

1.1 Problem Description<br />

According to the Metal-Mechanic Industry Directory 2008 (Directorio de la Industria Metal-<br />

Mecánica, DIMM, by its initials in Spanish) in Juarez City, there are approximately 200 companies<br />

in the field of Metal-Mechanic Industry, which represents an important source of jobs for the city.<br />

Thus, it is believed that there is substantial amount of workers engaged in the use of AMT.<br />

However, studies about the characteristics of the personnel and employees related with the<br />

operation and management of AMT and the integration of safety and ergonomic attributes in the<br />

decision making processes are scarce locally.<br />

It is well known that managers and DM face the problem of selection of many AMT<br />

alternatives; and there are multiple attributes involved in making a good decision, so it is difficult to<br />

consider all in their totality. In this way, this research pretends to explore the integration of ECA on<br />

the selection of AMT among 30 DM in local industries and to promote the consciousness about<br />

the benefits of ergonomics’ implementation.<br />

1.1.1 Objectives<br />

The objectives that arise in this work are divided into three specific and one general goal, which<br />

are explained below:<br />

1.1.1.1 General Objective<br />

Increase knowledge about the consideration of ergonomic attributes on the acquisition of<br />

Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) by means of a descriptive study and the application<br />

of the ECS to 30 DM in local companies.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 139


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

1.1.1.2 Specific Objectives<br />

Describe some important characteristics of the personnel involved in its operation, management<br />

and in the decision making processes for AMT acquisition.<br />

Identify common procedures for evaluation and selection of AMT.<br />

Provide a classification of the equipment used in these companies according to the manufacturing<br />

purpose.<br />

Increase knowledge about the reasons they may or may not include ergonomic and safety<br />

attributes on their decision making processes.<br />

1.1.2 Justification and Scope<br />

This research will provide information to managers and investors of the Metal Mechanic Industry<br />

about the integration of ergonomic attributes on the selection of AMT, which may have been<br />

previously obviated. According to Helander (2006), companies that take into account the<br />

ergonomic attributes on the selection process of AMT will result in safety, productivity and<br />

satisfaction of their workers.<br />

This work was made in the Metal Mechanic Industry in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, where an ECS<br />

was applied to DM to know some characteristics of their planning and selection processes of AMT<br />

and the personnel involved in such processes.<br />

2. LITERATURE REVIEW<br />

Ergonomic and safety aspects are significant for the design and operation of complex<br />

manufacturing systems like the ones related with AMT. These are being under estimated for the<br />

control of injuries and safety problems in the Manufacturing Industry (Karwowski, 1990, 2005).<br />

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States, the Mexican Social Security<br />

Institute (IMSS), the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, and the Report of Labor<br />

and Social Trends in Asia 2006 nowadays the Manufacturing Industry occupies one of the top five<br />

industries with the highest number of injuries, illnesses, days away from work, along with other<br />

important statistics worldwide. Additionally, in Mexico the operation of tools and machines is one<br />

of the top five occupations that report the highest numbers of these events also. However, there<br />

are difficulties to relate these events with the operation of AMT, due to insufficient information and<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 140


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

lack of attention to this topic (Maldonado, 2009). Important authors recognize that even when AMT<br />

was introduced among others reasons to reduce safety risks and hazards for humans, new and<br />

more critical ergonomic and safety risks have been detected since its introduction in<br />

manufacturing processes (Nicolaisen, 1995; Karwowski et. al., 1988; Karwowski and Salvendy,<br />

2006; Sugimoto et. al., 1985).<br />

In this way, managers and DM may have underestimated Human Factors and Ergonomics<br />

attributes in their decision in the way priority is given to other factors. Also they are unaware of<br />

these attributes and their benefits. Such ignorance has serious consequences for companies and<br />

their workers, since the operators work under physical and mental stress, eventually develop<br />

musculoskeletal trauma disorders and injuries for life, which represents large losses for jobs and<br />

businesses (Prado, 2001).<br />

3. METHODOLOGY<br />

The methodology presents the description of ECA and the ECS.<br />

3.1 Ergonomic Compatibility Attributes<br />

Ergonomic Evaluation of AMT is not an easy topic since ergonomic requirements (attributes) are<br />

not clearly determined in the literature and disperse, also it implies quantitative and qualitative<br />

aspects and its complexity and vagueness make an even harder problem to resolve. For<br />

Karwowski (2005), advanced technologies with which human interaction constitute complex<br />

systems that require a high level of integration, he considers that Ergonomic Compatibility<br />

Attributes of AMT have to focus in the design integration of the interactions between hardware<br />

(computer-based technology), organization (organizational structure), information system, and<br />

people (human skills and training). This was the foundation of the literature search, but also<br />

Corlett and Clark (1996) ergonomic guide for machine design was used. In this way, ergonomic<br />

compatibility evaluation main attributes (ECMA) for AMT, were divided into five parts: human skills<br />

and training compatibility (A11), physical work space compatibility (A12), usability (A13),<br />

equipment emissions (A14) and organizational requirements (A15). The main attribute A11<br />

includes two sub-attributes: skill level compatibility (A111) and training compatibility (A121). The<br />

main attribute A12 includes five sub-attributes: access to machine and clearances (A121),<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 141


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

horizontal and vertical reaches (A122), adjustability of design (A123), postural comfort of design<br />

(A124), physical work and endurance of design (A125). The main attribute A13 includes seven<br />

sub-attributes: controls design compatibility (A131), controls’ physical distribution (A132), visual<br />

work space design (A133), information load (A134), error tolerance (A135), man machine<br />

functional allocation (A136), design for maintainability (A137). The main attribute (A14) includes<br />

four sub-attributes: temperature (A141), vibration (A142), noise (A143), residual materials (A144).<br />

The main attribute (A15) includes two sub-attributes: rate of work machine compatibility (A151)<br />

and job content machine compatibility (A152).<br />

3.2 Ergonomic Compatibility Survey<br />

An Ergonomic Compatibility Survey (ECS) was designed for collect the information of the<br />

evaluation of AMT alternatives. The ECS has two versions; one of these versions was designed to<br />

be answered by experts and the other one to be answered by DM. For this work it will be analyzed<br />

the second version (DM). DM’ subjective opinions were needed. The ECS consists on 72<br />

questions but for the effects of this work only the first 22 questions were analyzed covering the<br />

sufficient information to make a descriptive study.<br />

3.2.1 Companies’ General Data<br />

The general data of the companies is requested in the first section of the ECS. Information<br />

includes average occupation and the respective gender. Also the workers’ average age for each<br />

gender is requested and workers’ average seniority to each gender. Finally, the kind of AMT used<br />

in the company is inquired.<br />

3.2.2 Characteristics of the Planning and Selection Process of Advanced Manufacturing<br />

Technology (AMT)<br />

This part includes 17 questions. This section aims to know some characteristics of the planning<br />

process for the acquisition of ATM in the company and who participate in the decision making.<br />

The first 3 questions refer to who makes the final purchasing decision of AMT. The next 3<br />

questions refer to how the AMT is identified and how the selection process is carried out. Finally,<br />

through the last 13 questions the integration of ergonomic and safety attributes on the selection<br />

process of AMT can be observed.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 142


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

This section presents the results obtained of the ECS described above.<br />

4.1 Results of Companies’ General Data<br />

This section shows the results of general data company.<br />

4.1.1 Gender and average occupation<br />

Companies of the survey occupy mainly male workers in all positions. According to the survey,<br />

male gender is preferable due to the nature of the work and the applied force that is required in<br />

some activities. The majority of female personnel found in these companies usually have<br />

administrative positions. Figure 1 shows these results. Additionally, average occupation is of 46<br />

workers among the participating companies.<br />

Number of Employees<br />

female<br />

14 %<br />

Figure 1. Gender of employees in the Metal Mechanical Sector<br />

4.1.2 Average age of employees<br />

Figure 2 shows that male workers employed have on average 29.76 years of age and female<br />

workers have on average of 30.80 years of age.<br />

female<br />

30.80<br />

Figure 2. Employees’ average age in the Metal Mechanic Sector<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 143<br />

male<br />

86 %<br />

Average Age<br />

male<br />

29.76


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

4.1.3 Average Seniority of employees<br />

Figure 3 shows that the average seniority of male workers is 6.79 years while female workers<br />

have average seniority of 4.03 years. This results show also that male gender is still being<br />

preferable above female gender in these companies.<br />

Figure 3. Average seniority in the Metal Mechanical Sector<br />

4.1.4 Equipment Used in the Metal Mechanical Sector Companies<br />

Participating companies present a variety of equipment. Equipment was classified into seven<br />

categories according to the manufacturing purpose: CNC Technology, Cutting Technology,<br />

Traditional Technology, Molding of Plastic Technology, Cleaning and Treatment of Metals<br />

Technology, Welding Technology, and Others.<br />

As it is shown in Figure 4, actually CNC Technology is almost as frequent to find as<br />

traditional Technology. Finally, a growing trend can be observed on equipment such as electrical<br />

discharge machines, flexible manufacturing cells, robots, robo-drills, and progressive die press<br />

found in the Others classification.<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

160<br />

female<br />

4.03<br />

12<br />

Average Seniority<br />

161<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 144<br />

21<br />

male<br />

6.79<br />

CNC Cutting Traditional Molding of Cleaning Welding<br />

Technology Technology Technology Plastics and Technology<br />

Technology Treatment<br />

of Metals<br />

Technology<br />

Figure 4. Classification of the Equipment Used in the companies<br />

27<br />

25<br />

64<br />

Others


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

4.2 Important Characteristics of the Selection Processes for AMT acquisition.<br />

This section shows the results of some characteristics of the planning and selection processes<br />

found in these companies.<br />

4.2.1 Planning Processes for the acquisition of AMT in the Industry<br />

Figure 5 shows that 77 % of the companies surveyed do perform some kind of planning processes<br />

for the acquisition of AMT; this indicates the relevance of a good decision making about AMT.<br />

Companies that do perform Planning<br />

Processes for AMT<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 145<br />

77 %<br />

YES<br />

Figure 5. Percentage of Companies that do perform Planning Processes for AMT acquisition<br />

In these companies, the planning processes performed for AMT acquisition are mainly part of<br />

engineering projects; this means that projects play an important role due to the specifications<br />

accomplishment on the selection of AMT. Also, in most of these companies the planning<br />

processes are executed only by the high management. Figure 6 shows the kind of personnel<br />

involved in the planning process for the acquisition of AMT.<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

4<br />

Management<br />

Group<br />

Sessions<br />

10<br />

E ngineering<br />

Project<br />

P lanning<br />

4<br />

23 %<br />

NO<br />

Upgrade of<br />

E quipment<br />

R equirements<br />

2<br />

Process<br />

E xecuted by<br />

Corporative<br />

Personnel<br />

7<br />

Process<br />

E xecuted by<br />

High<br />

Managemet<br />

Figure 6. Planning Process Execution for AMT acquisition<br />

Figure 7 shows that Executive and Administrative Personnel are mainly involved in the planning<br />

and selection processes; also in 35 % of the companies a group composed by executive,<br />

administrative and operative personnel conduct the decision for AMT acquisition.


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

35 %<br />

7 %<br />

17 %<br />

41 %<br />

E xecutive personnel<br />

Adminis trative pers onnel<br />

Operative pers onnel<br />

A group of the three<br />

Figure 7. Personnel who participate on the Planning Process for AMT acquisition<br />

Companies have different search methods for acquiring AMT. Some companies use two or three<br />

of this methods at the same time. Figure 8 shows that the use of internet web service and vendors<br />

casting are the most extended ways for search and acquire AMT, followed by benchmarking and<br />

equipment’s exhibit. Also the use empirical knowledge is included in the Others category.<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

13<br />

Vendors<br />

Casting<br />

7<br />

Equipment's<br />

E xhibit<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 146<br />

18<br />

Internet W eb<br />

Service<br />

8<br />

B enchmarking Others<br />

Figure 8. Searching Methods for AMT acquisition<br />

4.2.2 Application of Evaluation Processes for the selection of AMT<br />

Once the AMT has been identified, it is recommended to perform some kind of diagnosis<br />

processes to ensure that company’s expectations are met and avoid high costs. Figure 9 shows<br />

most of the companies do perform some kind of evaluation or diagnosis processes for AMT<br />

selection.<br />

Companies that perform some kind<br />

of evaluation<br />

20 %<br />

NO<br />

Figure 9. Companies that perform some kind of evaluation<br />

Among these companies, the processes are supported by experts in the first place; then by the<br />

use of checklists and standardized corporative formats, only a few use some specialized software;<br />

and one company uses only the experience (Figure 10). Companies that omit evaluation<br />

processes assume that the requirements are included by default in the equipment.<br />

80 %<br />

YES<br />

9


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

13<br />

Vendors<br />

Casting<br />

7<br />

Equipment's<br />

E xhibit<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 147<br />

18<br />

Internet W eb<br />

Service<br />

8<br />

B enchmarking Others<br />

Figure 10. Diagnosis Methods for the selection of AMT in the Metal Mechanic Sector<br />

These results show that most companies recur to experts to enhance their decisions.<br />

4.2.3 Ergonomic Attributes on the Planning Process<br />

Figure 11 shows that slightly more than a half of the surveyed companies that do apply some kind<br />

of evaluation process also consider ergonomic attributes on the selection of AMT. It is inferred by<br />

the attitude shown by managers and DM during interviews that 45% of them are unaware of the<br />

ergonomic attributes that may be involved in the evaluation, even some of them had not even<br />

heard about the topic.<br />

Ergonomic Attributes on the Planning<br />

Process<br />

45%<br />

NO<br />

55%<br />

YES<br />

Figure 11. Ergonomic Attributes on the Planning Process<br />

Ergonomic attributes included in the diagnoses of the equipment were diverse, but it was<br />

emphasized that all managers are looking for comfort for their operative personnel through proper<br />

postures and less effort. It was also important for managers the adjustability of the equipment.<br />

Additionally, usability of the equipment is required since they look for easiness of use in<br />

equipment and tools, also, Compatibility with Human Skills and Training seems to be the most<br />

important ergonomic attributes for DM on the selection of AMT according to Maldonado (2009).<br />

About DM who do not consider ergonomic attributes in the diagnoses, they argue that the priority<br />

on AMT must be on the technical aspects, costs and lead times. Also the main reason to do so is<br />

the lack of knowledge about Ergonomics and the need of a pragmatic model or method that<br />

facilitates their integration in decision making.<br />

9


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

On the other hand, safety attributes are included in the evaluation processes in almost all<br />

companies. Among the 30 companies surveyed, only one refused to include safety attributes in<br />

the diagnosis. Figure 12 shows this fact. It is deduced that safety attributes are much better known<br />

than Ergonomic Attributes among DM.<br />

Safety Attributes on the Planning Process<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 148<br />

3%<br />

NO<br />

97%<br />

YES<br />

Figure 12. Safety Attributes on the Planning Process<br />

In this research, most of the companies recognized that the integration of ergonomic attributes<br />

can become a strategic advantage for competitiveness; and for DM the combination of<br />

ergonomics and safety attributes would enhance the implementation of AMT, therefore it is easier<br />

to derive the benefits that both aspects generate. Figure 13 shows this fact.<br />

Companies that consider Ergonomics<br />

and Safety attributes help to a best<br />

implementation of AMT<br />

17 %<br />

NO<br />

Figure 13. Companies that find a strategic advantage of Ergonomics<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

It can be concluded that most companies surveyed do perform some kind of planning and<br />

selection processes for AMT acquisition. However, the integration of ergonomic and safety<br />

attributes are usually neglected in the diagnosis and selection processes for acquiring AMT. The<br />

final decision about AMT acquisition is lead by the high management personnel and is strongly<br />

supported by experts. It was found appropriate by DM to increase their knowledge about the<br />

ergonomics aspects that can be taken into account to support their decision due to they consider<br />

Ergonomic and Safety attribute as a strategic advantage. The AMT which predominate in the<br />

83 %<br />

YES


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Metal Mechanic Sector in Juarez, Mexico has gradually been replacing traditional technology.<br />

Different practices for decision making about AMT among companies were studied, making clear<br />

that engineering projects are one of the most important reasons to replace or acquire equipment.<br />

Finally, it was analyzed the methods used by companies to identify and search AMT, where the<br />

internet web service was the method preferred by DM due to its convenience.<br />

It is recommended to extend this study among macro enterprises which have higher occupation<br />

and may have records of accidents, injuries, days away from work and other events related with<br />

the operation of AMT. This may help to obtain more accurate results of the importance of the<br />

integration of ergonomic attributes on the selection of AMT.<br />

6. REFERENCES<br />

Corlett E. N. y Clark T.S. (1995). The Ergonomics of Workspaces and Machines, 2a. Edición,<br />

Taylor and Francis.<br />

European Agency for Safety and Health. 2007. “Work ILO Facts European Agency for Safety and<br />

Health at Work”,<br />

http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc90/pdf/rep-v-1.pdf.<br />

Helander, M. (2006). A guide to human factors and ergonomics, 2 nd Edition, Taylor & Francis<br />

Group, pp. 8.<br />

IMSS. 2007. “Estadísticas laborales del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social”,<br />

http://www.siicyt.gob.mx/siicyt/Principal.do?urlc=4,14.<br />

Karwowski W. 1990. “Injury control and worker safety in integrated manufacturing systems”,<br />

Unpublished Technical Report, Center for Industrial Ergonomics, University of Louisville,<br />

Louisville, Kentucky, United Sates of America.<br />

Karwowski W. 2005. “Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering,<br />

design, technology and management of human-compatible systems 1 ”, Ergonomics, Vol.48, No.<br />

5, Pgs. 436-463.<br />

Karwowski, W., Parsaei, H.R., Nash, D.L., and Rahimi, M. (1988). Human perception of the work<br />

envelope of an industrial robot, in Ergonomics of Hybrid Automated Systems, W. Karwowski, H.<br />

R. Parsaei, and M. R. Wilhem, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 421-428.<br />

Karwowski, W. and Salvendy, G. (2006). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, John Wiley<br />

& Sons Inc., United States of America.<br />

Labour and Social trends in Asean. 2007. “Labour and Social trends in Asean<br />

countries”,http://www.ilo.org/public/english/region/asro/bangkok/library/download/pub07-04.pdf.<br />

Maldonado Macías Aide Aracely, (2009). Tesis Doctoral, Instituto Tecnológico de Cd. Juárez.<br />

Diciembre 2009.<br />

Maldonado Aide, Noriega Salvador, Díaz Juan J., (2009). Ergonomic Compatibility Survey for the<br />

Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Proceedings of the International Safety and<br />

Occupational Ergonomics Conference.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 149


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Nicolaisen. P. (1985). Occupational safety and industrial robots-present stage of discussion within<br />

the tripartite Group on robotic safety, in Robot Technology and Applications,-Proceedings of the<br />

1 st Robotics Europe Conference, Brussels June 27-28, 1984, K. Rathmill, P. MacConaill, S.<br />

O’Leary, and J. Brown, Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 74-89.<br />

Prado León, L. (2001). Ergonomía y Lumbalgias ocupacionales.<br />

Sugimoto, N., and Kawaguchi, K. (1985). Fault-tree analysis of hazards created by robots, in<br />

Robot Safety, M. C. Bonney and Y.F. Yong, Eds, Spreinger-Verlag, KFS, Berlin, pgs.83-98.<br />

U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2005. “Survey Occupational Injuries and Illnesse Summary<br />

Estimates Package (Appendix B)”.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 150


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Remote Ergonomics Evaluations in the Office<br />

Jeffrey E. Fernandez 1 , Gabriel Ibarra-Mejia 2 , and Brandy F. Ware 1<br />

1 JFAssociates, Inc<br />

Vienna, VA 22181<br />

Corresponding author’s email: jf@jfa-inc.com<br />

2 University of Texas at El Paso<br />

Department of Public Health Sciences<br />

College of Health Sciences<br />

El Paso, TX<br />

Resumen: Existe una prevalencia de trastornos musculo-esqueléticos, tales como el Síndrome<br />

del Túnel de Carpo en el medio ambiente de oficinas, debido a la presencia de factores de riesgo<br />

de lesión. Muy a menudo, los factores causales de incomodidad pueden ser detectados a través<br />

de una evaluación del lugar de trabajo realizada por un individuo calificado, como lo es un<br />

ergonomista. Gran cantidad de compañía y empresas no cuentan el personal con la experiencia<br />

para realizar estas evaluaciones en forma interna, de tal manera que recurren a contratar<br />

ergonomistas calificados. El creciente uso de la tecnología disponible en los lugares de trabajo y<br />

la disminución de tiempos de entrega al realizar evaluaciones de lugares de trabajo, ha producido<br />

que el ergonomista adopte nuevos abordajes para la solución de problemas relacionados con la<br />

ergonomía. Este documento plantea la aplicación de evaluaciones ergonómicas de oficina<br />

realizada a distancia (remotas) a través de un ergonomista virtual.<br />

Abstract: In the office environment, musculoskeletal disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome<br />

are prevalent due the presence of injury risk factors. More often than not, the factors causing<br />

discomfort can be accessed through a workplace evaluation performed by a qualified individual,<br />

such as an ergonomist. Many companies do not have the expertise to conduct evaluations inhouse<br />

and hire a qualified ergonomist. The increasing use of enabling technology in the workplace<br />

and shrinking delivery times for workplace evaluations has necessitated that ergonomists adopt<br />

new approach to solving ergonomics related problems. This paper discusses the application of<br />

remote ergonomic evaluations of office workstations through a virtual ergonomist.<br />

Keywords: ergonomic evaluation, remote, office ergonomics<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 151


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

1. BACKGROUND<br />

The repetitive nature of office work (long term keyboard and mouse use) or inappropriately<br />

adjusted office equipment (i.e. chair and desk) could cause discomfort or injuries. Injuries often<br />

begin as discomfort and are caused by exposure over a period of time to the repetitive nature of<br />

work (long term keyboard and mouse use) or inappropriately adjusted equipment (i.e. chair and<br />

desk). More often than not, the factors causing discomfort can be accessed through a workplace<br />

evaluation performed by a qualified individual, such as an ergonomist.<br />

When the ergonomist visits the workplace, he/she interviews the client, collects<br />

measurements of the client and workplace, and makes recommendations. During the on-site<br />

evaluation, the client must host the ergonomist by meeting them, escorting them to their work<br />

area, and spending undivided attention while the ergonomist is there. This time away from their<br />

work decreases productivity. From the ergonomist’s perspective, there is time spent commuting,<br />

and collecting measurements at the workplace. In both of these cases, the cost is transferred to<br />

the client. The speed of business today leads clients to expect a shorter delivery time for the<br />

evaluations. Due to these factors, there is a need for a cost effective approach to solving office<br />

ergonomics related problems.<br />

One approach is to provide ergonomic evaluations through a virtual ergonomist (i.e. not onsite).<br />

The evaluation is initiated by client contacting the service provider and concludes with the<br />

virtual ergonomist following up with the client after recommending the necessary modifications.<br />

This paper outlines the process employed by a virtual ergonomist for conducting an ergonomic<br />

evaluation of an office workstation.<br />

2. PROCESS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The evaluation of the workstation includes all of the same basic elements of an in-person<br />

evaluation along with the same deliverables. This process was initially implemented in paper /<br />

electronic form using email for data transfer. The evaluation process flow is shown in Figure 1.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 152


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The first stage of the process is the initial contact with the client. The assessment sequence<br />

is generally triggered an employee or other individual (e.g. health services, management)<br />

requesting an evaluation of the workstation in response to a perceived issue such as discomfort or<br />

pain (reactive).<br />

The next stage includes obtaining background information, workstation and anthropometric<br />

measurements (as shown in a pictorial diagram that is provided), body part discomfort rating, and<br />

digital data from the client. The still photos and /or video clips of the work area and the activities<br />

being performed is the additional piece of data that is critical to the successful completion of a<br />

remote ergonomics evaluation. The still images should be of the client in their work environment<br />

simulating work tasks from different angles and locations to adequately demonstrate the postures<br />

obtained during work. When possible, video footage should also be obtained of the real-time<br />

performance of work (or simulated work) to demonstrate frequency information. A good rule of<br />

thumb is that video data should be 5-10 minutes in length and include all significant tasks<br />

performed by the client.<br />

During the time the ergonomist reviews the data provided by the client, there might be a need<br />

to contact the client to clarify or obtain more information about the discomfort, tasks, or<br />

workstation setup. During the evaluation, at least three opportunities for information exchange via<br />

phone call or video conference should be provided. The initial interaction should be to clarify the<br />

initial background information provided and educate the client on proper ergonomic setup. The<br />

second interaction should be to review the work related risk factors identified through the<br />

evaluation. At this time, the ergonomist will review the recommendations and discuss possible<br />

options for modification to a setup. The third interaction should occur after the workstation<br />

modifications have been made by the client. This interaction may be visual (e.g. include photos or<br />

video) in addition to verbal. This final stage of the evaluation is a very important element of the<br />

process. A follow-up is essential to ensure that the end-user neither experiences any discomforts<br />

similar to the ones before the workstation modification nor does he/she develop any additional<br />

discomforts. At this time, the virtual ergonomist reviews the worksite for completeness of the<br />

recommendations and to ensure that no other risk factors are present. Additional follows may be<br />

scheduled as per need.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 153


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The output of a remote ergonomic evaluation will be very similar to those generated with a<br />

traditional, on-site evaluation. The output in a written report should include a review of the current<br />

status, a listing of the observed risk factors, and a list of recommended changes both short term<br />

and long term.<br />

Figure 1. Process Flow for an Ergonomic Office Evaluation through Virtual Ergonomist (Fernandez<br />

et. al, 2009)<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 154


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

A remote system requires an understanding of the information needed, comprehensive<br />

mastery of the fundamental office ergonomics principles and their application, and an appropriate<br />

interpretation of the data provided by client. In most cases, only a certified and qualified<br />

ergonomist(s) is an appropriate choice for these evaluations. The affect of such remote<br />

evaluations could save clients money, decrease carbon footprint, and improve the transfer of<br />

ergonomic information to remote locations.<br />

The most advanced application of a virtual ergonomist involves the use of the internet as a<br />

platform for providing the aforementioned services. A website with interactive screens is required<br />

to solicit information. Additionally, the website should provide the user with the capability to upload<br />

pictures and videos for review. The interactive screens of the web site should parallel the flow of<br />

the remote evaluation.<br />

3. TESTING AND IMPLEMENTATION<br />

This process has been tested in the U.S. A. and Mexico. The testing involved the<br />

participation of clients in the same manner as the end product was intended. Throughout the<br />

testing, input was received on the nature of the questions that were asked and the<br />

appropriateness of the directions given. As a result of the testing, refinements were made to the<br />

processes and checklists to improve usability and ensure comprehensive collection of relevant<br />

data.<br />

4. REFERENCES<br />

Fernandez, J.E., Ware, B.F., Kumar, A., and Subramanian, A. (2009). Office Ergonomics<br />

Assessment Through Virtual Ergonomist. Proceedings of the 14 th International Conference<br />

on Industrial Engineering, Theory, Applications and Practice. Anaheim, CA.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 155


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AN ERGONOMIC EVALUATION AND THE USERS'<br />

SATISFACTION OF NEW EDUCATIONAL CENTERS<br />

B.Eng. Martín Daniel Del Sol Rangel 1 , M.Eng. Manuel Sandoval Delgado 2<br />

POSTGRADUATE <strong>DE</strong>PARTMENT AND INVESTIGATION<br />

INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO <strong>DE</strong> HERMOSILLO<br />

Tecnológico Ave. And Periférico Poniente Blvd, Sahuaro<br />

HERMOSILLO, SONORA, 83170<br />

Daniel-delsol@hotmail.com, msandoval@ith.mx<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Globalization is transforming all the products in comfort, while clients, current or potential, are<br />

constantly increasing demands and expectations, products seemed fine yesterday, today may not<br />

be satisfactory, it is then that to win and retain customers, organizations need to find something to<br />

turn into a competitive advantage, that element is the quality. All organization looking to be more<br />

competent and always at the forefront, offering the best to its customers and users, resulting in a<br />

successful project.<br />

The managing a project involves the application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to<br />

project activities so that they meet or exceed the needs and expectations of the stakeholders of a<br />

project. The factors for the success of the project are the set of circumstances, facts, or influences<br />

which contribute to the project results. The success of the projects we perceive from two<br />

approaches, one micro which is represented by the cost, delivery time and meet customer<br />

specifications, the other is the macro that represents the total satisfaction of the user who uses it.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 156


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

The present work of investigation is a comparative analysis between studies of "Verification of the<br />

environmental conditions in the facilities design of new buildings at the preschool level creation in<br />

the education sector in Hermosillo, Sonora" and "Anthropometry and verification of facilities design<br />

buildings at the preschool level ups in the education sector in Hermosillo, Sonora”, against the<br />

results of the study “Factors influencing the satisfaction of user of schools newly created basic<br />

level in Hermosillo, Sonora ", There are no studies that serve as background or base for departure<br />

because it is a recent project of the Sonora Institute for Educational Infrastructure, which reports<br />

to the State Government and which has never measured the satisfaction of users of such works<br />

public.<br />

2 OBJECTIVES<br />

Making a comparison between the perceptions of the user against the measurements obtained in<br />

the two studies mentioned above, concurrent, and find out if its result compared with the official<br />

standards and anthropometric measures for installations in schools, have a value of significance<br />

in user satisfaction. Be conducted only in the municipality of Hermosillo, Sonora, in the four<br />

schools of this type found in the city.<br />

3 METHODS<br />

Was determined primarily based sample, in this case 32 which is the total of people working in<br />

these institutions, being interviewed teachers, administrative and support, were interviewed by<br />

school staff, as direct users , to hear his perspective from the macro environment, as well as<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 157


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

some people working in the Sonora Institute of Educational Infrastructure to meet their<br />

expectations of the quality they deliver these works, that is, from the micro environment, with<br />

this design A pilot survey to discover the needs or problems that arose within those premises<br />

was a validation of the survey was applied in only one school, and was designed to be<br />

analyzed a survey based on certain items required for research using the method Servqual,<br />

which defines service quality as the difference between actual perceptions by users and is a<br />

multi-scale instrument that has a high level of reliability and validity, that any organization can<br />

use to better understand the expectations and perceptions about service users. The model<br />

includes two dimensions of expectations: expectations desired (which I'd like in ideal terms)<br />

and appropriate expectations (the acceptable level of service expected). Besides this is divided<br />

into headings such as, visual perception and environmental design, ambient conditions, safety,<br />

and responsiveness in terms of failures and complaints in the facility.<br />

Thus, a survey was designed to apply well-defined in the entire field of study, ie, universal primary<br />

education schools and kindergartens in the newly created municipality of Hermosillo.<br />

Respondents were only administrative and teaching staff, these being the ability to direct users to<br />

answer the survey because students are also users but do not have the maturity to respond<br />

coherently to the research questions.<br />

4 RESULTS<br />

In implementing the surveys, we will realize the factors that influence the level of satisfaction of<br />

users of each of these schools, we can compare each of them, finding differences and similarities<br />

between themselves and in turn, and by type of primary or preschool, and thus may provide<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 158


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

feedback to those implementing this project, and be able to carry not only the success of the micro<br />

environment but also from the macro. As well as we can compare these plots obtained in the<br />

surveys carried out against the measurements obtained in the other two parallel research this and<br />

see whether they comply with official standards, and then be detected if it affects the user<br />

satisfaction.<br />

Figure 1. Results obtained in the survey research, “Factors are<br />

influencing the satisfaction of users of schools newly created basic<br />

level in Hermosillo, Sonora”, in the Kindergarten “Los Arroyos”.<br />

Figure 2. Results obtained in the survey research, “Factors are<br />

influencing the satisfaction of users of schools newly created basic<br />

level in Hermosillo, Sonora”, in the Elementary School “Los Arroyos”.<br />

The question 6, is related to the lighting of the classroom, if considered appropriate for the proper<br />

performance of students and teachers, including the cataloged in the case of kindergarten as<br />

excellent and as good in the Elementary School, giving it a rating 10 and 8 respectively. Here we<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 159


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

see the data in the study of "Verification of environmental conditions in the facility design of the<br />

buildings at the preschool level ups in the education sector in Hermosillo, Sonora."<br />

Table 1. Results obtained in the ergonomic study research “Verification of<br />

environmental conditions in the facility design of the buildings at the preschool<br />

level ups in the education sector in Hermosillo, Sonora” in Kindergarten “Los<br />

Arroyos”.<br />

The minimum level of lighting according to the NOM 025 analyzed, the minimum standard of this<br />

factor must be 300 (lux) for the elderly, it is important to note that the measurement gives us a<br />

number below this value. This result gives justification to change the lighting to classify it as only<br />

good with an 8 on a scale of 5-10. The questioning in July, is related to the temperature of the<br />

room, if it is deemed for the good performance of pupils and teachers, cataloged them both in<br />

Kindergarten and Primary School under 8, or Regular. Here we see the data in the study of<br />

“Verification of environmental conditions in the facility design of the buildings at the preschool level<br />

ups in the education sector in Hermosillo, Sonora”.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 160


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 2. Results obtained in the ergonomic study research “Verification of environmental conditions<br />

in the facility design of the buildings at the preschool level ups in the education sector in Hermosillo,<br />

Sonora” in Kindergarten “Los Arroyos”.<br />

The INIFED says that the environmental conditions that are suitable for work in comfort in the<br />

case of classrooms are 18 to 25 degrees Celsius and can see that this condition is not met, most<br />

of the measurements exceeds 25 degrees Celsius. Therefore, find out why the temperature is<br />

listed as fair, although the results reflected rather as bad. As for the results of the investigation<br />

"Anthropometry and verification of plant design of the buildings at the preschool level ups in the<br />

education sector in Hermosillo, Sonora" was against a comparative study and survey of the results<br />

were similar furnishings and facilities and equipment not designed for the good performance of<br />

students mainly, not based on anthropometric tables according to your needs.<br />

Thus, these results will support this project to strengthen Sonora School, offer these areas of<br />

opportunity for improvement in those who develop, ie, the Sonora Institute of Educational<br />

Infrastructure and also propose a concurrent engineering work, where without participation of all<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 161


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

stakeholders, including of course, users who guarantee from a macro perspective, the success of<br />

our project.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Cavassa Cesar Ramirez, Ergonomics and Productivity (2006), Cesar Ramirez Cavassa. - 2nd.<br />

Ed - Mexico: Limusa, Chapter 8 Ergonomics and working environment.<br />

2. Evan Lindsay (2000), Management and Quality Control, Ed Thompson 2000.<br />

3. Evaluación.pdf<br />

http://www.inifed.gob.mx/NORMASTÉCNICAS/VOLUMENTomo20PlaneaciónProgramaci<br />

óny<br />

4. Francis Quintero (2010) "Verification of environmental conditions in the facility design of the<br />

buildings at the preschool level ups in the education sector in Hermosillo, Sonora."<br />

5. Hiram Higuera (2010) Anthropometry and verification of plant design of the buildings at the<br />

preschool level ups in the education sector in Hermosillo, Sonora. "<br />

6. Julius Panero (1993), The human dimensions indoors, Ed G. Gili, SA., Mexico, D.F., pp. 23.<br />

7. C. S. Lim and M. Mohamed Zain (1999) "Criteria of project success: an Exploratory re-<br />

examination", International Journal of Project Management Vol 17, No. 4, Great Britain,<br />

pp. 243-248.<br />

8. O terminal, David J. (1990), Ergonomics in action: adaptation in the working environment of<br />

man. - 2nd edition - Mexico: Trillas, (reprint 2007).<br />

9. Roberto Hernandez Sampieri (1998) Research Methodology, Ed McGraw-Hill.<br />

10. Standardization of the STPS, www.stps.gob.mx<br />

11. Ted Klastorin (2008) Project management. Alfaomega Group Editor. Mexico City, Mexico. 242<br />

pages.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 162


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

<strong>DE</strong>SIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MANUFACTURING CELL<br />

WITH ERGONOMIC SUPPORT ANALYSIS<br />

MC. Rigoberto Zamora Alarcón 1 , Ing. Manuel Enrique Alcaráz Ayala 2 ,<br />

MC. Julio César Romero González 3<br />

1 Ingenieria Mecánica-Industrial<br />

Universidad Autónoma de Baja California-Instituto Tecnológico de Mexicali<br />

Blvd. Benito Juárez S/N<br />

Mexicali, Baja California 21100<br />

mczamora02@yahoo.com.mx<br />

2 Ingeniero de Manufactura ambiental<br />

Consultor Independiente<br />

Mexicali, Baja California<br />

enrique.alcaraz@hotmail.com<br />

3 Ingeniero de manufactura y proyectos<br />

Instituto Tecnológico de Mexicali<br />

Mexicali, Baja California<br />

mc.julio.romero@gmail.com<br />

Resumen: Este estudio muestra el desarrollo del proyecto desde la perspectiva general del<br />

análisis de riesgo ergonómico utilizando el método RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment). El<br />

análisis arrojo información para mejorar el ambiente de trabajo. Se desarrollo el Proyecto de<br />

evaluación ergonómica en una compañía metalmecánica con más de 16 años en Mexicali, con el<br />

propósito de enfocar esfuerzos en la prevención de riesgos ergonómicos.<br />

El proyecto se apoyo en las características retrospectivas (5 años) de los registros médicos,<br />

evidenciando lesiones músculo tendinosas en muñecas en las áreas de trabajo de ensamble,<br />

específicamente en una estación en particular; los cuales fueron determinantes para definir el<br />

proyecto en las celdas de manufactura.<br />

Objetivo: Reconocer evaluar y controlar los riesgos laborales por actividades repetitivas,<br />

posturas, y agentes del medio que por sus características puedan causar daños a la salud,<br />

considerado el análisis ergonómico aplicado al concepto de celdas de manufactura<br />

Metodología empleada: Normas oficiales Mexicanas de STPS (Secretaria de Trabajo y<br />

Previsión Social) vigentes, Evaluación RULA/BRIEF, Mediciones antropométricas, Principios de<br />

celdas de manufactura<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 163


Resultados<br />

Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Tabla 1 Resultados del proyecto<br />

Mejora en Índice de frecuencia<br />

Tendinitis 95%<br />

Dolor de cuello 100%<br />

Espalda 90%<br />

Beneficio<br />

Rotación de personal 0%<br />

Desperdicio -33%<br />

Optimización de espacio 40%<br />

Productividad 40%<br />

Condiciones ambientales<br />

Iluminación 100%<br />

Ruido 100%<br />

Conclusiones: Con base a los datos obtenidos:<br />

Disminuyo el índice de frecuencia de lesiones por tendinitis, dolor de cuello y espalda;<br />

impactando de manera favorable la rotación<br />

Se considerarán para el diseño de las estaciones de trabajo, la media poblacional del estudio<br />

antropométrico<br />

Se comprobó que el costo beneficio de la aplicación de la ergonomía generó mejoras<br />

significativas en las condiciones laborales beneficiando a casi 500 empleados<br />

Palabras Clave: Celdas de manufactura, RULA, Análisis Ergonómico<br />

Abstract: This study shows the project's general perspective for ergonomic hazards using the<br />

RULA’s (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment) method. Analysis shows information to improve the work<br />

environment. Project ergonomics was developed in a metalworking company with over 16 years in<br />

Mexicali, with the proposed of focusing efforts on preventing ergonomic risk.<br />

The project was supported in retrospective characteristics (5 year) medical records, which showed<br />

muscle lesions in wrist tendon (CTD: Cumulative Trauma Disorder) areas specifically assembly<br />

work at a particular station, were decisive in defining the project in manufacturing cell.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 164


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Objectives: Recognize asses and control the labor risks for repetitive activities, postures, and<br />

environmental agents that have certain characteristics may cause damage to health, considered<br />

the ergonomic analysis applied to the concept of manufacturing cells.<br />

Used methodology: Mexican official standards of existing STPS (Secretaria de Trabajo y<br />

Previsión Social), RULA Assessment, Anthropometric measurements and Principles of<br />

manufacturing cells.<br />

Results:<br />

Table 1 Project results<br />

Improved Frequency index<br />

Tendinitis 95%<br />

Neck pain 100%<br />

Back and shoulders 90%<br />

Benefits<br />

Absenteeism 0%<br />

Waste -33%<br />

Space optimization 40%<br />

Productivity 40%<br />

Environmental conditions<br />

Ilumination 100%<br />

Noise 100%<br />

Conclusions: Based on the data:<br />

Reduce the frequency index of tendinitis injuries, neck and back pain, favorably impacting the<br />

absenteeism.<br />

Will be considered for the design of workstations, the population mean anthropometric study.<br />

It was found that the cost benefit of the application of ergonomics to yield significant<br />

improvements in working conditions, benefiting nearly 500 employees.<br />

keywords. Manufacturing cells, RULA and Ergonomic Analysis<br />

1.- INTRODUCTION<br />

This study shows some of the environmental factors of process redesign in a metalworking<br />

company with over 16 years in Mexicali, initiating the development of the project from the overall<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 165


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

perspective of ergonomic risk analysis methods using RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment) /<br />

BRIEF. The analysis yields information to improve the working environment, in order to focus<br />

efforts on preventing ergonomic hazards.<br />

The project will support the features retrospectives (five years) of medical records, showing<br />

muscle tendon in wrist injuries in the assembly work areas, specifically in a particular season,<br />

which were crucial in defining the project in the cells manufacturing.<br />

Later it was necessary to implement each of the principles of manufacturing cells, which had as<br />

one of its aims to cut down injuries sustained when production lines were used and the<br />

advantages that the implementation of this system of manufacturing production in its approach .<br />

It was remarkable to observe that first applied the standards and principles Japanese and<br />

Mexican Americans than the standards established by federal labor law.<br />

2.- Objective<br />

Recognize evaluate and control occupational hazards by repetitive activities, postures, and<br />

environmental agents which by its nature could cause damage to health, considered the<br />

ergonomic analysis applied to the concept of manufacturing cells<br />

3. Methodology<br />

3.1. Factors and Design Techniques<br />

To develop improvements as a project in newly created department was required to first<br />

determine the factors necessary in a process or product improvement, further weighting. Factors<br />

that were discussed and were weighted were: packaging, ergonomics, reliability, maintenance,<br />

manufacturing, environment, performance and safety. Of the above factors stood out in his group,<br />

ergonomics and manufacturing, which were diagnosed as other such systems and subsystems as<br />

corresponded in the following items on this article.<br />

3.1.1 Weight and diagnostic medical. To be able to support the weight of the plant physician, was<br />

necessary to make a diagnosis of injuries in the last 5 years behavior which is shown in Figure 1.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 166


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 1. Injury graphic in the last five years in the production line<br />

As can be seen from the graph in Figure 1, tendinitis injuries were the most frequently expressed,<br />

in analyzing the documents supporting the physician receives a particular station as the main<br />

carrier of the injury. It was decided to take a more precise analysis of the case which had<br />

previously been tested ergonomically down significantly, however, the cases have involved the<br />

previous year that operators avoid working in the station. The weighting is determined whether<br />

one could know if our proposals were significant in their environment, it was necessary for the<br />

same thermal analysis on a ship operated blade in a municipality that maintains extreme<br />

temperatures in the year. Realising the study as shown in Figure 2, the tendinitis was found<br />

increased in the months where the heat is great in Mexicali.<br />

Figure 2. Tendinitis injury in the last five years<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 167


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

3.2. Mexican Official Standards of STPS (Secretary of Labor and Social Welfare) in force Federal<br />

Labor Law art. 132 Obligations of Employers Cap. X, Ergonomics art. 102. (Federal Regulation on<br />

Safety, Hygiene and Working Environment 1997)<br />

The official Mexican standards determined by the Secretary of Labor and Social Welfare in effect<br />

allowed us to measure each of the parameters set by physical and chemical conditions, however,<br />

to labor issues in the area we focus on the chemical physics but also evaluated<br />

3.2.1 Physical<br />

Vibrations (NOM-024-STPS-2001),<br />

Noise (NOM-011 - STPS-2001). Concentration equivalent dB (A): continuous, intermittent,<br />

fluctuating and Impact,<br />

Lighting (NOM-025-STPS-1999)<br />

a) Disposition: General, located, and auxiliary<br />

b) Artificial: Incandescent, fluorescent, vapor and H<br />

c) Natural<br />

d) Combined<br />

Radiation<br />

a) Ionizing (NOM-012-STPS-1999) x-rays, radioisotope and other<br />

b) Non-ionizing (NOM-013-STPS-1993), ultraviolet, infrared, radio frequency and other static<br />

Electricity (NOM-022-STPS-1999)<br />

Thermal conditions (NOM-015-STPS-2001)<br />

3.2.2 Chemicals<br />

Substance (NOM-010 - 1999 STPS-)<br />

3.3. Anthropometric measurements<br />

Some anthropometric measurements of operators are working in the plant are shown in Table 1<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 168


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Table 1 Some anthropometric measurements of line operators<br />

3.4. RULA Assessment / BRIEF<br />

Poor posture is considered one that moves away from a neutral position or physiological, where<br />

they play an important role while maintaining the posture and the handling of heavy objects.<br />

(Kroemer 2000). Since the results were assessed at the station representing more problems in<br />

production lines using the method as the main tool right RULA showed results that could be<br />

considered in the design of new stations. First results were deciphered on the right of operators to<br />

both women and men as shown in Figure 3 where we obtained the results of urgent change of<br />

season.<br />

3.5 Principles of manufacturing cells (Villaseñor 2009)<br />

1. Place machines and workstations as close as possible to minimize the distance to be walking<br />

2. Free from obstructions routes and install comfortable floor worker<br />

Increase the safety of workers<br />

Improved productivity<br />

Greater flexibility of work for each operator<br />

2. Keep the cell width of 4 feet to allow flexibility, relocation and redistribution of work among team<br />

members<br />

Minimize distances of each operator<br />

Operators have access to both sides of the cell<br />

Increases the flexibility of the work cycle, so there may be operating on both sides of the<br />

cell U<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 169


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 3. RULA Evaluation for production line (belt)<br />

4. Heights consistently maintain places of work and materials at the point of use<br />

5. Locate the end of the line as close as possible to the next line.<br />

6. Avoid carrying a piece of top-down and front-back<br />

Always avoid placing the parts manufactured in shelves, racks, boxes or any container that is<br />

out of the process<br />

7. Where possible, use gravity to assist the operator in the placement and movement of materials<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 170


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

8. Design a system of two containers refill<br />

9. Install flexible and movable equipment in the cell distribution to fit easily<br />

Facilitates continuous improvement efforts, reduce time and costs for the relocation of<br />

production in cells<br />

Improve response times to changes in products or processes<br />

8. Manufacturing cell design for flexibility of volume<br />

a. Flexibility:<br />

b. Design assembly line layout to cellular manufacturing in a "U" or "U" open.<br />

c. Eliminate communication barriers and increase teamwork<br />

9. Minimize the distance between operations transfer<br />

10. Cycle times operator must be at or below the target time / takt<br />

a. Ensure that the cell meets the customer demand time<br />

b. Ensures that meets the capacity requirements<br />

13. Design routes operating within the cell, making sure not cross<br />

a. Increases operator safety<br />

b. Facilitates flow of material<br />

c. Optimize productivity by removing obstacles from the path<br />

d. Ensures follow-up sequence of work<br />

14. Design the cells for operators to work within it.<br />

a. Promotes communication and teamwork<br />

b. Improved response time and operating in several machines or workstations<br />

c. Optimize production space<br />

d. Reduce travel distances<br />

15. Design the cells so that the rotation of the work is against clockwise<br />

a. Improved ergonomic design<br />

b. Facilitates milestone<br />

c. Standardize more material flow<br />

d. Eliminate wasted movement when moving the product of the hand that receives the<br />

working<br />

16. Design the cells so that the operations are more than one piece among stations<br />

a. Minimize WIP<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 171


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

b. Pull Production System or milestone<br />

17. Design the cells to ensure that all parties go through all seasons<br />

18. Design the cells so that the operator can easily perform various operations.<br />

a. Helps to improve the ergonomic design by reducing repetitive movements<br />

b. Improves mobility and versatility of workers<br />

c. Allows greater flexibility<br />

d. Promotes "system thinking", continuous improvement<br />

e. Eliminate each operation specialists<br />

f. Improved response time<br />

g. Improved communication<br />

h. Improved teamwork<br />

i. Improving the skills of each to rotate the cell operations<br />

19. Design the cells so that the operator never trapped<br />

20. Better handling of material<br />

a. Improving the response time<br />

4. Results<br />

4.1 Medical conditions for improved stations applied in manufacturing cells<br />

Measurements after the improvements implemented in the stations of the manufacturing cells<br />

reduce injuries allowed as shown in Figure 4<br />

4.2. RULA assessment implemented in manufacturing cells. Improvements in manufacturing<br />

cell stations were significant as shown below. First results on the right of operators to both<br />

women and men shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9 where we obtained the results to changes in<br />

tasks<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 172


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 4 raph of injuries sustained in the first year of cells<br />

5. Conclusions:<br />

6.<br />

1. We complied with the standards prescribed by the current Mexican<br />

2. Engineering controls were implemented through:<br />

a) were improved work areas with more light,<br />

b) decreased redesign of machinery noise<br />

c) the use of workstations in the corresponding cells that fulfilled the relevant principles<br />

d) Development of tools to reduce ergonomic hazards<br />

e) Improved handling containers and material moving<br />

3. Administrative Controls<br />

• Work was rescheduled through the seasons in the manufacturing cell<br />

• were established relaxation breaks that allow staff<br />

4. Work practice controls<br />

• is looking to keep the body in neutral positions<br />

5. Based on the data obtained from the RULA ergonomic evaluation and implementation of<br />

manufacturing cells<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 173


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

Figure 5 RULA evaluation in cell<br />

a. Reduce the frequency rate of tendinitis injuries, neck and back pain, impacting favorably<br />

rotation<br />

b. be considered for the design of workstations, the population mean anthropometric study<br />

c. It was found that the cost benefit of the application of ergonomics led to significant<br />

improvements in working conditions, benefiting nearly 500 employees<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 174


Ergonomía Ocupacional. Investigaciones y Aplicaciones. Vol 3 2010<br />

5. REFERENCES<br />

Kromer, Grand Jean E (2000) Fitting the task to the human. Taylor & Francis<br />

Villaseñor, Contreras Alberto (2009) Lean Manufacturing ed. Limusa Mexico, D.F.<br />

Ley Federeal del Trabajo y Leyes de Seguridad Social 2009 Tax Editores unidos, S.A de<br />

C.V. Mexico, D.F.<br />

Zandin, Manual del Ingeniero Industrial quinta edición, ed. McGraw-Hill<br />

Niebel/Frievalds (2006) Ingenieria Industrial, Métodos, Estándares y Diseño del Trabajo,<br />

11ª Edición. (ed. Alfaomega)<br />

Mondelo, Pedro R, Gregori, Enrique, Blasco, Joan, Barran, Pedro (2004) Ergonomía 3<br />

Diseño de puestos de Trabajo, Ed. Alfaomega<br />

Baudin, Michel (2001), Design of Manufacturing Cells.<br />

Sociedad de Ergonomistas de México, A.C. 175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!