14.10.2013 Views

Study 3: Ecodestruction and the Right to Food: The Cases of Water ...

Study 3: Ecodestruction and the Right to Food: The Cases of Water ...

Study 3: Ecodestruction and the Right to Food: The Cases of Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Starving <strong>the</strong> Future <strong>Study</strong> 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dublin Declaration on “<strong>Water</strong> in a perspective <strong>of</strong> sustainable development” originating from <strong>the</strong><br />

International Conference on <strong>Water</strong> <strong>and</strong> Environment in 1992 in preparation <strong>of</strong> UNCED had noted that:<br />

“[I]t is especially crucial <strong>to</strong> recognize <strong>the</strong> basic right <strong>of</strong> all human beings <strong>to</strong> have access <strong>to</strong> drinking water<br />

<strong>and</strong> sanitation at affordable price.”<br />

“Blue Gold”, <strong>the</strong> 1999 special report on “<strong>The</strong> global water crisis <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> commodification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world’s<br />

water supply” published by <strong>the</strong> International Forum on Globalization (IFG), advocates that access <strong>to</strong><br />

clean water for basic needs is a fundamental human right. This is echoed in one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ten principles<br />

formulated in <strong>the</strong> report: “An adequate supply <strong>of</strong> clean water is a human right.” 17 This may sound<br />

elemental, but at <strong>the</strong> Second World <strong>Water</strong> Forum in <strong>the</strong> Hague in March 2000, it was <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> a<br />

heated debate. <strong>The</strong> World Bank <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> water companies reportedly tried <strong>to</strong> declare it merely a “human<br />

need” in order <strong>to</strong> avoid states obligations <strong>to</strong> protect <strong>and</strong> fulfil access <strong>to</strong> water. Such states obligations<br />

would not necessarily rule out private sec<strong>to</strong>r activities in <strong>the</strong> water system, but would exclude h<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

over <strong>the</strong> water system <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> private sec<strong>to</strong>r. Human rights are by nature inalienable: <strong>The</strong>y cannot be<br />

signed away even by <strong>the</strong> beneficiary <strong>of</strong> this right – let alone by her state.<br />

In recent years Riccardo Petrella (former president <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>of</strong> Lisbon) <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs have advocated a<br />

“World <strong>Water</strong> Contract”. Part <strong>of</strong> that initiative is <strong>to</strong> streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> water as a human right. In his<br />

new book “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Manifes<strong>to</strong>” 18 Petrella suggests “<strong>the</strong> drafting <strong>and</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> a legally binding<br />

world water convention which integrates <strong>the</strong> political, economic <strong>and</strong> social right <strong>of</strong> individual <strong>and</strong><br />

collective access <strong>to</strong> water in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Universal Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human <strong>Right</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> same approach will have<br />

<strong>to</strong> be applied <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r charters <strong>and</strong> conventions bearing upon human rights, national rights <strong>and</strong> minority<br />

rights.”<br />

A right <strong>to</strong> water, in fact, has not been explicitely referred <strong>to</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> 1948 Universal Declaration <strong>of</strong><br />

Human <strong>Right</strong>s (UDHR) nor in <strong>the</strong> 1966 International Covenant on Economic, Social <strong>and</strong> Cultural <strong>Right</strong>s<br />

(ICESCR) – <strong>the</strong> main sources <strong>of</strong> livelihood rights in international law. <strong>The</strong>re may be some speculation<br />

why a right <strong>to</strong> water had not been spelled out. At <strong>the</strong> time when <strong>the</strong> Declaration <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Covenants were<br />

drafted (between 1946 <strong>and</strong> 1966) water related oppression was already well-known: Never<strong>the</strong>less <strong>the</strong><br />

full scarcity dimension <strong>of</strong> water became clear only after <strong>the</strong> 1970s with <strong>the</strong> enormous importance which<br />

irrigation developped for food production in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “Green Revolution” <strong>and</strong> with <strong>the</strong> stark<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> human consumption <strong>and</strong> population pressures.<br />

v. <strong>The</strong> right <strong>to</strong> drinking water – a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> food?<br />

In <strong>the</strong> UN human rights system so far <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> water has been dealt with in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rights<br />

<strong>to</strong> health, <strong>to</strong> housing – <strong>and</strong> most recently – <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> food. Its natural place is in <strong>the</strong> ambit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> right<br />

<strong>to</strong> an adequate st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> living. Article 25 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UDHR proclaims that “Everyone has <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> living adequate for <strong>the</strong> health <strong>and</strong> well-being <strong>of</strong> himself <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> his family, including food,<br />

clothing , housing, medical care <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> necessary social services …” It should be clear that access <strong>to</strong><br />

drinking water is a basic element <strong>of</strong> any definition <strong>of</strong> “st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> living adequate for <strong>the</strong> health <strong>and</strong> wellbeing”.<br />

UDHR art. 25 <strong>the</strong>n gave rise <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> an adequate st<strong>and</strong>ard living including food, clothing<br />

<strong>and</strong> housing (ICESCR art.11) <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> health (ICESCR art.12) <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r rights. ICESCR was<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore seen <strong>to</strong> contain a right <strong>to</strong> food <strong>and</strong> a right <strong>to</strong> housing as well. <strong>Water</strong> was taken up explicitely in<br />

<strong>the</strong> General Comments on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Right</strong>s <strong>to</strong> Housing <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> Health. General Comment No.4 (1991) on <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Right</strong> <strong>to</strong> Housing notes (in para 8.b) …”All beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> adequate housing should have<br />

sustainable access <strong>to</strong> natural <strong>and</strong> common resources, safe drinking water, …” General Comment 14<br />

(2000) on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Right</strong> <strong>to</strong> Health stipulates as a core obligation “<strong>to</strong> ensure access <strong>to</strong> basic shelter, housing<br />

<strong>and</strong> sanitation, <strong>and</strong> an adequate supply <strong>of</strong> safe <strong>and</strong> potable water.”(para 43(3)). Curiously enough<br />

General Comment 12 (1999) on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Right</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> does not make explicite mention <strong>of</strong> water. In <strong>the</strong><br />

sense that water is just a special type <strong>of</strong> food – this may not have been deemed necessary.<br />

FIAN International 116<br />

June 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!