Study 3: Ecodestruction and the Right to Food: The Cases of Water ...
Study 3: Ecodestruction and the Right to Food: The Cases of Water ...
Study 3: Ecodestruction and the Right to Food: The Cases of Water ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Starving <strong>the</strong> Future <strong>Study</strong> 3<br />
32<strong>The</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal figure <strong>and</strong> urban/rural figures are from FAO, <strong>the</strong> internal differentiation <strong>of</strong> rural figures are crude extrapolations <strong>of</strong><br />
data from rural Bangladesh, World Bank 1985.<br />
33 GMO – Genetically Modified Organisms<br />
34 Report <strong>and</strong> Recommendations on Organic Farming. U.S.Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, 1980<br />
35 <strong>Food</strong> First Institute, Oakl<strong>and</strong>, California 1999<br />
36 Pretty / Generating Agriculture, Earthscan London 1995<br />
37 <strong>The</strong> absolute poverty line (indicating malnutrition) is generally set at 1 US$ per day or 365 US$ per year. Roughly 75% go<br />
for food. For <strong>the</strong> 300 million non-agricultural malnourished, this would mean 82 billion US$. <strong>The</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal OECD producer<br />
subsidies equivalent (PSE: <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> tansfers from consumers <strong>to</strong> producers that result from agricultural policies) was at<br />
an average <strong>of</strong> 179 billion US$ in 1902-3 (J.Pretty / op.cit). <strong>The</strong> South Centre in Geneva puts it for 1998 even 274 billion US$<br />
(www.twnsite/org/title/modalities.htm). Most <strong>of</strong> it was pocketed by agribusiness. <strong>The</strong> subsidies for agribusiness are <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
more than sufficient <strong>to</strong> carry most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> this massive programme for an immediate eradication <strong>of</strong> malnutrition among<br />
300 million malnourished non-agriculturists – along with lavish support for a thorough agrarian reform <strong>to</strong>wards productive<br />
sustainable agriculture for <strong>the</strong> 500 million malnourished peasants <strong>and</strong> agricultural workers in <strong>the</strong> South.<br />
38 H.Geist, E. Lambin / Proximate Causes <strong>and</strong> Underlying Driving Forces <strong>of</strong> Tropical Deforestation, BioScience, February<br />
2002 / Vol.52 No.2, p.143 ff<br />
39 Umweltbundesamt, Daten zur Umwelt, 1988/1989, Berli,n according <strong>to</strong><br />
E.U.von Weizsäcker / Erdpolitik; Darmstadt1992<br />
40 Due <strong>to</strong> multiple causation, figures don’t add up <strong>to</strong> 711.<br />
41 (1999), Tuxill, John : "Plant Losses threaten Future <strong>Food</strong> Supplies <strong>and</strong> Health Care", News Release, World Watch Institute<br />
www.worldwatch.org/alerts/990916.html<br />
42 all data: J.Pretty, op.cit<br />
43 (1977), Kendrick Jr., J.B. : Preserving Our Genetic Resources. In California Agriculture, September 1977, S.2<br />
44 (1978), Omang, J. : Plants with Alien Names Hold Promise <strong>of</strong> a Brave New World. In <strong>The</strong> Washing<strong>to</strong>n Post, 28th September 1978<br />
45 FAO / <strong>Food</strong> for All, Rome 1996, p.30<br />
46 Commission on Human <strong>Right</strong>s; Subcommission on <strong>the</strong> Promotion <strong>and</strong> Protection <strong>of</strong> Human <strong>Right</strong>s E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/7<br />
47 http://www.rafi.org/article.asp?newsid=133 or www.sacredearth.com/ethnobotany/biotech1.html<br />
48 See Greenpeace Press releases. www.greenpeace.org. 16 May 2002.<br />
49 Certain “<strong>the</strong>rapeutical” genetic manipulations even turned out <strong>to</strong> result in leukaemia, as was recently discovered at<br />
Hannover University’s Medical School. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 99, Heft 17, 26.April 2002<br />
50 <strong>The</strong> precautionary principle states that ra<strong>the</strong>r than await certainty, regula<strong>to</strong>rs should act in anticipation <strong>of</strong> any potential<br />
environmental harm in order <strong>to</strong> prevent it. This principle is so frequently invoked in international environmental resolutions<br />
that it can be seen as a basic normative principle <strong>of</strong> international environmental law.<br />
51 To read more, www.megalink.com/fobomade. Foro boliviano sobre medio ambiente y desarollo.<br />
52 See Greenpeace Press releases, http://www.greenpeace.org/~geneng/highlights/gmo/april24_monsan<strong>to</strong>.html<br />
53 Ens.lycos.com/ens/aug99/1999L-08-02-06.html<br />
54 A.Alonso, Francisco Dallmeier, Working for Biodiversity, Smithsonian Institution, Washing<strong>to</strong>n D.C.2000<br />
55 Moreover ecological footprint provides an indica<strong>to</strong>r for sustainability: <strong>The</strong> footprint indicates a sustainable way <strong>of</strong> life, if it<br />
stays with in <strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bioproductive area available. <strong>The</strong> bioproductive area per capita in 2000 was 2.1 ha on a global<br />
average, 5.5 ha in <strong>the</strong> USA, 0.6 ha in China, with an overshoot (dem<strong>and</strong>-supply) <strong>of</strong> –0.3 ha globally, -4.1 ha in <strong>the</strong> USA, -0.8<br />
ha in China)<br />
56 <strong>The</strong> USA also shows <strong>the</strong> largest fertility rate (2.0 births per woman) <strong>of</strong> all OECD countries (average: 1.7).World<br />
Development Report 2000/2001<br />
57 N.Chambers, C.Simmons, M.Wackernagel / Sharing Nature’s Interest. London 2000<br />
58 N.Chambers, C.Simmons, M.Wackernagel, op.cit.p.125 ff<br />
59 „Da brennt es überall“ (DIE ZEIT, May 8, 2002, translation FIAN)<br />
FIAN International 142<br />
June 2002