15.10.2013 Views

Submission - Vietnam Veterans' Federation - Department of Finance ...

Submission - Vietnam Veterans' Federation - Department of Finance ...

Submission - Vietnam Veterans' Federation - Department of Finance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mr Trevor Matthews, MA, FIA, FIAA, ASA<br />

Pension Indexation Review Secretariat<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finance</strong> and Deregulation<br />

John Gorton Building<br />

King Edward Terrace<br />

PARKES ACT 2600<br />

15 July 2008<br />

Dear Mr Mathews,<br />

VIETNAM VETERANS’ FEDERATION<br />

8 Mary Street Granville PO Box 170 GRANVILLE NSW 2142,<br />

Phone (02) 9682 1788 Fax (02) 9682 6134<br />

Incorporating<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans Peacekeepers and Peacemakers Association NSW Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Queensland Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> ACT Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Victorian Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Peacekeepers Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tasmania<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans, Peacekeepers and Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia WA<br />

Branch<br />

Attached is our submission to the Review <strong>of</strong> Pension Indexation Arrangements in Australian<br />

Government Civilian and Military Superannuation Schemes.<br />

Yours sincerely,<br />

Tim McCombe<br />

President


<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia <strong>Submission</strong> to the<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Pension Indexation Arrangements in Australian Government Civilian and Military<br />

Superannuation Schemes<br />

CUMULATIVE % INCREASE<br />

140.0<br />

130.0<br />

120.0<br />

110.0<br />

100.0<br />

90.0<br />

80.0<br />

70.0<br />

60.0<br />

50.0<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0<br />

31-Dec-89.<br />

Dec-90<br />

CUMULATIVE % INCREASE IN: CPI, AGE PENSION, MTAWE, AWOTE & MP's SALARY & PENSION<br />

AWOTE (PS): Average Weekly Ordinary Time Earnings, Public Sector, All full time adult persons. (124.9%), [4.54%]<br />

M P's SALARY & PENSION: Linked to The Remuneration Tribunal's Principal Executive Officer<br />

Classification Band A. (131.0%), [4.69%]<br />

AGE PENSION: The Single Person Age Pension, linked to the greater <strong>of</strong> CPI or 25% <strong>of</strong> MTAWE. (104.6%), [4.32%]<br />

MTAWE: Male Total Average Weekly Earnings, All Male employees total earnings. (98.4%), [3.82%]<br />

CPI: Consumer Price Index. ( Used to Index ComSuper & Aust. Defence Force Pensions.) (63.54%), [2.73%]<br />

NB Cumulatiive indexation values over 18.25 years are indicated in brackets (--.-% )<br />

Average compound indexation values % per annum are indicated in brackets [-.--%]<br />

Dec-91<br />

Dec-92<br />

Dec-93<br />

Dec-94<br />

MP's SALARY & PENSION<br />

Dec-95<br />

Dec-96<br />

AWOTE (PS) MTAWE AGE PENSION CPI MP'S SALARY & PENSION<br />

Dec-97<br />

Dec-98<br />

Dec-99<br />

Dec-00<br />

Dec-01<br />

Dec-02<br />

Dec-03<br />

AWOTE(PS)<br />

Dec-04<br />

Dec-05<br />

Dec-06<br />

AGE<br />

PENSION<br />

MTAWE<br />

CPI,<br />

ComSuper & Australian Defence<br />

Force Pensions<br />

VER 15 31-03-08<br />

Dec-07<br />

140.0<br />

130.0<br />

120.0<br />

110.0<br />

100.0<br />

90.0<br />

80.0<br />

70.0<br />

60.0<br />

50.0<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0


14 July 2008<br />

VIETNAM VETERANS’ FEDERATION<br />

8 Mary Street Granville PO Box 170 GRANVILLE NSW 2142,<br />

Phone (02) 9682 1788 Fax (02) 9682 6134<br />

Incorporating<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans Peacekeepers and Peacemakers Association NSW Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Queensland Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> ACT Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Victorian Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Peacekeepers Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tasmania<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans, Peacekeepers and Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia WA<br />

Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia<br />

<strong>Submission</strong> to<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Pension Indexation Arrangements in Australian<br />

Government Civilian and Military Superannuation<br />

Schemes<br />

Paper No 1 – Indexation<br />

The graph on the front cover <strong>of</strong> this submission shows how poorly the indexation <strong>of</strong><br />

DFRB, DFRDB and MSBS military superannuation pensions has served retiring<br />

Australian Defence Force members compared with how the more generous indexation<br />

<strong>of</strong> other government pensions such as the Age, Disability and War Widows pensions has<br />

served their recipients and especially how the even more generous indexation <strong>of</strong><br />

parliamentary pensions has served members <strong>of</strong> parliament.<br />

Indeed, since 1989, the pensions <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> parliament have increased some 60%<br />

more than DFRB, DFRDB and MSBS pensions and other government pensions such as<br />

Age, Invalid, War Widow etc pensions have increased some 35% more.<br />

Far from there being an acceptable rational for this disparity, there is every reason that<br />

DFRB, DFRDB and MSBS pensions should be the most favourably indexed. Members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Australian Defence Force have suffered conditions <strong>of</strong> service far less favourable<br />

than civilians including:<br />

liability for compulsory high risk combat operations (in the life <strong>of</strong> the DFRB,<br />

DFRDB and MSBS pension schemes, Australia has been involved in many<br />

conflicts including the Malayan Emergency, Indonesian Confrontation, the<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> War, Timor, Iraq and Afghanistan);<br />

a restriction <strong>of</strong> liberty in a regimented way <strong>of</strong> life;<br />

compulsory long and irregular working hours;<br />

compulsory statutory retiring ages well below the community norms;


Page 2 July 18, 2008<br />

compulsory high standards <strong>of</strong> physical fitness;<br />

frequent compulsory relocation causing schooling and network dislocation; and<br />

long periods <strong>of</strong> compulsory separation from family.<br />

DFRDB, DFRB and MSBS military superannuation pensions were calculated as a certain<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> the wage <strong>of</strong> the rank at which the member left the service. Justice demands<br />

that each member’s DFRDB, DFRB and MSBS pension be restored to that percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the current wage <strong>of</strong> that rank, then indexed either to increases in the wage <strong>of</strong> that rank<br />

or to increases in the other government pensions such as the Age, Disability and War<br />

Widows pensions.<br />

Before 1997, other government pensions such as Age, Disability and War Widows<br />

pensions, were indexed to increases in the cost <strong>of</strong> living (CPI) only. But because these<br />

pensions were falling further and further behind community incomes, the government, in<br />

that year, re-indexed them so that they increased with increases in the cost <strong>of</strong> living<br />

(CPI) but established a minimum pension <strong>of</strong> 25% <strong>of</strong> the average wage (MTAWE).<br />

Military superannuation pensions, however, were left to languish, indexed only to<br />

changes in the cost <strong>of</strong> living (CPI) and so have continued to fall farther and farther<br />

behind community incomes. It is a sad fact that long standing military superannuants<br />

have lost many thousands <strong>of</strong> dollars each by military superannuation pensions being<br />

excluded from the 1997 changes.<br />

Tim McCombe<br />

President


15 July 2008<br />

VIETNAM VETERANS’ FEDERATION<br />

8 Mary Street Granville PO Box 170 GRANVILLE NSW 2142,<br />

Phone (02) 9682 1788 Fax (02) 9682 6134<br />

Incorporating<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans Peacekeepers and Peacemakers Association NSW Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Queensland Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> ACT Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Victorian Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Peacekeepers Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tasmania<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans, Peacekeepers and Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia WA<br />

Branch<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia<br />

<strong>Submission</strong> to<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Pension Indexation Arrangements in Australian<br />

Government Civilian and Military Superannuation<br />

Schemes<br />

Paper No 2 – Other Influences on the Value <strong>of</strong><br />

DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS pensions<br />

SOME DFRB/DFRBF/MSBS MILITARY SUPERANNUANTS have opted to receive<br />

a ‘commuted’ lump sum payment with a compensating reduction <strong>of</strong> their fortnightly<br />

pensions.<br />

The amount <strong>of</strong> this reduction was calculated by dividing the lump sum payment<br />

by how many years the recipient had to live according to government life expectancy<br />

tables. Other things being equal, the more years the recipient had to live, the less each<br />

pension payment had to be reduced to compensate for receiving the lump sum.<br />

But life expectancy has increased markedly in the last thirty years. This means<br />

that the amount <strong>of</strong> money deducted from fortnightly pensions to compensate for<br />

receiving the lump sum should be reducing.<br />

No such reduction has occurred, because the old, out <strong>of</strong> date, life expectancy<br />

tables are still being used.<br />

It is easy to see that current life expectancy tables should be applied to those who<br />

opted for lump sum payments; a change which would result in modestly increased<br />

fortnightly pension payments.<br />

We are at a loss to understand why out <strong>of</strong> date life expectancy tables should<br />

continue to be used.


Page 2 July 18, 2008<br />

WE NOTE THAT PENSIONS FROM ‘taxed’ superannuation funds are no longer<br />

subject to taxation but pensions from ‘untaxed’ superannuation funds, including<br />

DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS, receive only a minor tax concession.<br />

Contributions to DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS were compulsory. Contributors could<br />

not choose to pay or not pay tax on their contributions. There having been no choice it<br />

seems unfair to deny veterans tax-free pensions.<br />

This discrimination has imposed a double disadvantage on military<br />

superannuants. Firstly, as we have pointed out, they do not receive tax-free pensions.<br />

Secondly, unlike those whose pensions are not taxed, military superannuants pension<br />

income is added to any other income, the new total perhaps raising their marginal tax<br />

rate.<br />

DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS military superannuation pensions should cease being<br />

taxed. If this is not possible, then, at least, pension income should not be added to other<br />

income but taxed separately so as not to push the pensioner into a higher tax bracket.<br />

FINALLY, WE NOTE that, whilst the spouse <strong>of</strong> a deceased parliamentarian receives<br />

83% <strong>of</strong> the decease’s superannuation pension, the spouses <strong>of</strong> deceased<br />

DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS superannuants receive only 62.5%.<br />

Are the spouses <strong>of</strong> parliamentarians worth more that the spouses <strong>of</strong> war<br />

veterans?<br />

Tim McCombe<br />

President

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!