Submission - Vietnam Veterans' Federation - Department of Finance ...
Submission - Vietnam Veterans' Federation - Department of Finance ...
Submission - Vietnam Veterans' Federation - Department of Finance ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Mr Trevor Matthews, MA, FIA, FIAA, ASA<br />
Pension Indexation Review Secretariat<br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Finance</strong> and Deregulation<br />
John Gorton Building<br />
King Edward Terrace<br />
PARKES ACT 2600<br />
15 July 2008<br />
Dear Mr Mathews,<br />
VIETNAM VETERANS’ FEDERATION<br />
8 Mary Street Granville PO Box 170 GRANVILLE NSW 2142,<br />
Phone (02) 9682 1788 Fax (02) 9682 6134<br />
Incorporating<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans Peacekeepers and Peacemakers Association NSW Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Queensland Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> ACT Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Victorian Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Peacekeepers Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tasmania<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans, Peacekeepers and Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia WA<br />
Branch<br />
Attached is our submission to the Review <strong>of</strong> Pension Indexation Arrangements in Australian<br />
Government Civilian and Military Superannuation Schemes.<br />
Yours sincerely,<br />
Tim McCombe<br />
President
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia <strong>Submission</strong> to the<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Pension Indexation Arrangements in Australian Government Civilian and Military<br />
Superannuation Schemes<br />
CUMULATIVE % INCREASE<br />
140.0<br />
130.0<br />
120.0<br />
110.0<br />
100.0<br />
90.0<br />
80.0<br />
70.0<br />
60.0<br />
50.0<br />
40.0<br />
30.0<br />
20.0<br />
10.0<br />
0.0<br />
31-Dec-89.<br />
Dec-90<br />
CUMULATIVE % INCREASE IN: CPI, AGE PENSION, MTAWE, AWOTE & MP's SALARY & PENSION<br />
AWOTE (PS): Average Weekly Ordinary Time Earnings, Public Sector, All full time adult persons. (124.9%), [4.54%]<br />
M P's SALARY & PENSION: Linked to The Remuneration Tribunal's Principal Executive Officer<br />
Classification Band A. (131.0%), [4.69%]<br />
AGE PENSION: The Single Person Age Pension, linked to the greater <strong>of</strong> CPI or 25% <strong>of</strong> MTAWE. (104.6%), [4.32%]<br />
MTAWE: Male Total Average Weekly Earnings, All Male employees total earnings. (98.4%), [3.82%]<br />
CPI: Consumer Price Index. ( Used to Index ComSuper & Aust. Defence Force Pensions.) (63.54%), [2.73%]<br />
NB Cumulatiive indexation values over 18.25 years are indicated in brackets (--.-% )<br />
Average compound indexation values % per annum are indicated in brackets [-.--%]<br />
Dec-91<br />
Dec-92<br />
Dec-93<br />
Dec-94<br />
MP's SALARY & PENSION<br />
Dec-95<br />
Dec-96<br />
AWOTE (PS) MTAWE AGE PENSION CPI MP'S SALARY & PENSION<br />
Dec-97<br />
Dec-98<br />
Dec-99<br />
Dec-00<br />
Dec-01<br />
Dec-02<br />
Dec-03<br />
AWOTE(PS)<br />
Dec-04<br />
Dec-05<br />
Dec-06<br />
AGE<br />
PENSION<br />
MTAWE<br />
CPI,<br />
ComSuper & Australian Defence<br />
Force Pensions<br />
VER 15 31-03-08<br />
Dec-07<br />
140.0<br />
130.0<br />
120.0<br />
110.0<br />
100.0<br />
90.0<br />
80.0<br />
70.0<br />
60.0<br />
50.0<br />
40.0<br />
30.0<br />
20.0<br />
10.0<br />
0.0
14 July 2008<br />
VIETNAM VETERANS’ FEDERATION<br />
8 Mary Street Granville PO Box 170 GRANVILLE NSW 2142,<br />
Phone (02) 9682 1788 Fax (02) 9682 6134<br />
Incorporating<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans Peacekeepers and Peacemakers Association NSW Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Queensland Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> ACT Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Victorian Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Peacekeepers Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tasmania<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans, Peacekeepers and Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia WA<br />
Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia<br />
<strong>Submission</strong> to<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Pension Indexation Arrangements in Australian<br />
Government Civilian and Military Superannuation<br />
Schemes<br />
Paper No 1 – Indexation<br />
The graph on the front cover <strong>of</strong> this submission shows how poorly the indexation <strong>of</strong><br />
DFRB, DFRDB and MSBS military superannuation pensions has served retiring<br />
Australian Defence Force members compared with how the more generous indexation<br />
<strong>of</strong> other government pensions such as the Age, Disability and War Widows pensions has<br />
served their recipients and especially how the even more generous indexation <strong>of</strong><br />
parliamentary pensions has served members <strong>of</strong> parliament.<br />
Indeed, since 1989, the pensions <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> parliament have increased some 60%<br />
more than DFRB, DFRDB and MSBS pensions and other government pensions such as<br />
Age, Invalid, War Widow etc pensions have increased some 35% more.<br />
Far from there being an acceptable rational for this disparity, there is every reason that<br />
DFRB, DFRDB and MSBS pensions should be the most favourably indexed. Members<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Australian Defence Force have suffered conditions <strong>of</strong> service far less favourable<br />
than civilians including:<br />
liability for compulsory high risk combat operations (in the life <strong>of</strong> the DFRB,<br />
DFRDB and MSBS pension schemes, Australia has been involved in many<br />
conflicts including the Malayan Emergency, Indonesian Confrontation, the<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> War, Timor, Iraq and Afghanistan);<br />
a restriction <strong>of</strong> liberty in a regimented way <strong>of</strong> life;<br />
compulsory long and irregular working hours;<br />
compulsory statutory retiring ages well below the community norms;
Page 2 July 18, 2008<br />
compulsory high standards <strong>of</strong> physical fitness;<br />
frequent compulsory relocation causing schooling and network dislocation; and<br />
long periods <strong>of</strong> compulsory separation from family.<br />
DFRDB, DFRB and MSBS military superannuation pensions were calculated as a certain<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> the wage <strong>of</strong> the rank at which the member left the service. Justice demands<br />
that each member’s DFRDB, DFRB and MSBS pension be restored to that percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the current wage <strong>of</strong> that rank, then indexed either to increases in the wage <strong>of</strong> that rank<br />
or to increases in the other government pensions such as the Age, Disability and War<br />
Widows pensions.<br />
Before 1997, other government pensions such as Age, Disability and War Widows<br />
pensions, were indexed to increases in the cost <strong>of</strong> living (CPI) only. But because these<br />
pensions were falling further and further behind community incomes, the government, in<br />
that year, re-indexed them so that they increased with increases in the cost <strong>of</strong> living<br />
(CPI) but established a minimum pension <strong>of</strong> 25% <strong>of</strong> the average wage (MTAWE).<br />
Military superannuation pensions, however, were left to languish, indexed only to<br />
changes in the cost <strong>of</strong> living (CPI) and so have continued to fall farther and farther<br />
behind community incomes. It is a sad fact that long standing military superannuants<br />
have lost many thousands <strong>of</strong> dollars each by military superannuation pensions being<br />
excluded from the 1997 changes.<br />
Tim McCombe<br />
President
15 July 2008<br />
VIETNAM VETERANS’ FEDERATION<br />
8 Mary Street Granville PO Box 170 GRANVILLE NSW 2142,<br />
Phone (02) 9682 1788 Fax (02) 9682 6134<br />
Incorporating<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans Peacekeepers and Peacemakers Association NSW Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Queensland Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> ACT Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> Victorian Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Peacekeepers Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tasmania<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans, Peacekeepers and Peacemakers <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia WA<br />
Branch<br />
<strong>Vietnam</strong> Veterans <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australia<br />
<strong>Submission</strong> to<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> Pension Indexation Arrangements in Australian<br />
Government Civilian and Military Superannuation<br />
Schemes<br />
Paper No 2 – Other Influences on the Value <strong>of</strong><br />
DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS pensions<br />
SOME DFRB/DFRBF/MSBS MILITARY SUPERANNUANTS have opted to receive<br />
a ‘commuted’ lump sum payment with a compensating reduction <strong>of</strong> their fortnightly<br />
pensions.<br />
The amount <strong>of</strong> this reduction was calculated by dividing the lump sum payment<br />
by how many years the recipient had to live according to government life expectancy<br />
tables. Other things being equal, the more years the recipient had to live, the less each<br />
pension payment had to be reduced to compensate for receiving the lump sum.<br />
But life expectancy has increased markedly in the last thirty years. This means<br />
that the amount <strong>of</strong> money deducted from fortnightly pensions to compensate for<br />
receiving the lump sum should be reducing.<br />
No such reduction has occurred, because the old, out <strong>of</strong> date, life expectancy<br />
tables are still being used.<br />
It is easy to see that current life expectancy tables should be applied to those who<br />
opted for lump sum payments; a change which would result in modestly increased<br />
fortnightly pension payments.<br />
We are at a loss to understand why out <strong>of</strong> date life expectancy tables should<br />
continue to be used.
Page 2 July 18, 2008<br />
WE NOTE THAT PENSIONS FROM ‘taxed’ superannuation funds are no longer<br />
subject to taxation but pensions from ‘untaxed’ superannuation funds, including<br />
DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS, receive only a minor tax concession.<br />
Contributions to DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS were compulsory. Contributors could<br />
not choose to pay or not pay tax on their contributions. There having been no choice it<br />
seems unfair to deny veterans tax-free pensions.<br />
This discrimination has imposed a double disadvantage on military<br />
superannuants. Firstly, as we have pointed out, they do not receive tax-free pensions.<br />
Secondly, unlike those whose pensions are not taxed, military superannuants pension<br />
income is added to any other income, the new total perhaps raising their marginal tax<br />
rate.<br />
DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS military superannuation pensions should cease being<br />
taxed. If this is not possible, then, at least, pension income should not be added to other<br />
income but taxed separately so as not to push the pensioner into a higher tax bracket.<br />
FINALLY, WE NOTE that, whilst the spouse <strong>of</strong> a deceased parliamentarian receives<br />
83% <strong>of</strong> the decease’s superannuation pension, the spouses <strong>of</strong> deceased<br />
DFRB/DFRDB/MSBS superannuants receive only 62.5%.<br />
Are the spouses <strong>of</strong> parliamentarians worth more that the spouses <strong>of</strong> war<br />
veterans?<br />
Tim McCombe<br />
President