15.10.2013 Views

FinCEN SAR Activity Review, Trends, Tips & Issues, Issue 10

FinCEN SAR Activity Review, Trends, Tips & Issues, Issue 10

FinCEN SAR Activity Review, Trends, Tips & Issues, Issue 10

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

transaction or transactions; is derived from illegal activity or intended to hide<br />

or disguise funds or assets derived from illegal activity; is designed to evade<br />

the requirements of the BSA, whether through structuring or other means;<br />

serves no business or apparent lawful purpose and the MSB knows of no<br />

reasonable explanation for the transaction after examining all available facts;<br />

or involves use of the MSB to facilitate criminal activity. 4<br />

Given the growth in number of MSBs, including the ancillary provision of<br />

such services, we are working to ensure that these businesses comply with<br />

federal registration, anti-money laundering program, and recordkeeping and<br />

reporting requirements. To that end, we have begun to study relevant <strong>SAR</strong>s<br />

so that we may understand how, and the extent to which, banks and other<br />

financial institutions identify potentially unregistered MSBs. The first phase<br />

of this study examined depository institution <strong>SAR</strong>s filed between January 1,<br />

2002 and April 30, 2005. The findings from that study, involving 1,214 <strong>SAR</strong>s,<br />

are presented herein.<br />

On April 26, 2005, <strong>FinCEN</strong>, along with the federal banking agencies, issued<br />

interagency interpretive guidance to depository institutions on providing<br />

banking services to MSBs operating in the United States 5 (Interagency<br />

Guidance). In that guidance, we specifically directed depository institutions<br />

to file <strong>SAR</strong>s on businesses that are unregistered or unlicensed MSBs. We<br />

also stated that the guidance was not “a directive to banking organizations<br />

to conduct immediately a review of existing accounts for known MSBs for the<br />

sole purpose of determining licensing or registration status.” <strong>FinCEN</strong> and<br />

the federal banking agencies’ expectations have not changed in this regard.<br />

The Interagency Guidance has been incorporated into the Federal Financial<br />

Institutions Examination Council’s (FFIEC’s) 2005 BSA/Anti-Money<br />

Laundering Examination Manual. 6<br />

Preliminary research reveals that between May 1, 2005 and February<br />

28, 2006, depository institutions filed an additional 2,934 <strong>SAR</strong>s related<br />

to suspected unregistered MSB activities. The filing volume during this<br />

ten-month period reflects a 142 percent increase over the more than three-<br />

4 See, generally 31 C.F.R. § <strong>10</strong>3.20. Special note concerning issuers of money orders and traveler’s<br />

checks: issuers are only required to report transactions or patterns of transactions that are suspicious<br />

and involve or aggregate funds or other assets of at least $5,000 if identification of those transactions<br />

is derived from a review of clearance records or other similar records in connection with items sold or<br />

processed. 31 C.F.R. § <strong>10</strong>3.20(a)(3).<br />

5 See “Interagency Interpretive Guidance on Providing Banking Services to Money Services Businesses<br />

Operating in the United States,” (April 26, 2005) available at<br />

http://www.fincen.gov/guidance04262005.pdf.<br />

6 An electronic version of the FFIEC BSA/AML Examination Manual may be found at http://www.ffiec.<br />

gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/manual_online.htm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!