15.10.2013 Views

Draft Minutes 13th Oct - Fingal County Council

Draft Minutes 13th Oct - Fingal County Council

Draft Minutes 13th Oct - Fingal County Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2024<br />

For: For: <strong>Council</strong>lors <strong>Council</strong>lors McKeon, McKeon, McKeon, O’Leary O’Leary. O’Leary<br />

Against: Against: <strong>Council</strong>lors <strong>Council</strong>lors Butler, Butler, Byrne, Byrne, Coppinger, Coppinger, Coyle, Coyle, Daly, Daly, Dennison, Dennison, Farrell<br />

Farrell<br />

A., Farrell Farrell Farrell KK.,<br />

K , , Hamill, Hamill, Hamill, Kelleher, Kelleher, Kelleher, Loftus, Loftus, Loftus, Maher, Maher, Maher, McGuinness,<br />

McGuinness,<br />

McGuinness,<br />

Murray, Murray, Nulty, Nulty, O’Brien, O’Brien, O’Callaghan, O’Callaghan, O’Connor, O’Connor, O’Donovan, O’Donovan, Waine.<br />

Waine.<br />

Abstain: Abstain: Abstain: <strong>Council</strong>lors<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lors <strong>Council</strong>lors Devitt, Devitt, McGuire. McGuire.<br />

The Mayor, <strong>Council</strong>lor K. Farrell declared the Motion LOST LOST. LOST LOST<br />

F/ F/1536/ F/<br />

1536/ 1536/10 1536/ 10 10<br />

LANDS LANDS AT AT BALLYMADUN<br />

BALLYMADUN<br />

MOTION MOTION D3.13<br />

D3.13<br />

It was proposed by <strong>Council</strong>lor T. O Leary, seconded by <strong>Council</strong>lor A. Devitt.<br />

“That <strong>Fingal</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolves that the following Local Objective be placed<br />

on the GE zoned lands at Ballymadun identified on the accompanying map<br />

outlined in red and signed for identification purposes by the proposer of this<br />

motion in the <strong>Fingal</strong> Development Plan 2011-2017. Applications for HT-High<br />

Technology uses on lands zoned general employment which would not<br />

compromise the overall vision for the GE zoning may be considered on their<br />

merits.”<br />

The following report by the Manager which had been circulated was considered:<br />

“The site was the subject of MD3.30 to rezone HT to GE which was passed.<br />

It would appear that the proposed motion is seeking by way of local objective to<br />

apply 2 zoning matrix to a single land parcel (I.e. HT and GE matrices). This is<br />

inappropriate at this location.<br />

The GE zoning is envisaged as providing for general opportunities for enterprise<br />

and employment whist the HT zoning is more focused to provide for office,<br />

research and development and high technology and advanced manufacturing type<br />

employment. While there are some uses common to both GE and HT zonings<br />

other land uses are not considered compatible. Uses identified for GE zoned land<br />

are more car and HGV based compared with HT lands. HT users seek high quality<br />

physical environments next to other similar high technology users and not more<br />

general industry.<br />

The GE zoning allows for a wider range of land uses and is considered the most<br />

appropriate zoning at this location.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!