Draft Minutes 13th Oct - Fingal County Council
Draft Minutes 13th Oct - Fingal County Council
Draft Minutes 13th Oct - Fingal County Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2024<br />
For: For: <strong>Council</strong>lors <strong>Council</strong>lors McKeon, McKeon, McKeon, O’Leary O’Leary. O’Leary<br />
Against: Against: <strong>Council</strong>lors <strong>Council</strong>lors Butler, Butler, Byrne, Byrne, Coppinger, Coppinger, Coyle, Coyle, Daly, Daly, Dennison, Dennison, Farrell<br />
Farrell<br />
A., Farrell Farrell Farrell KK.,<br />
K , , Hamill, Hamill, Hamill, Kelleher, Kelleher, Kelleher, Loftus, Loftus, Loftus, Maher, Maher, Maher, McGuinness,<br />
McGuinness,<br />
McGuinness,<br />
Murray, Murray, Nulty, Nulty, O’Brien, O’Brien, O’Callaghan, O’Callaghan, O’Connor, O’Connor, O’Donovan, O’Donovan, Waine.<br />
Waine.<br />
Abstain: Abstain: Abstain: <strong>Council</strong>lors<br />
<strong>Council</strong>lors <strong>Council</strong>lors Devitt, Devitt, McGuire. McGuire.<br />
The Mayor, <strong>Council</strong>lor K. Farrell declared the Motion LOST LOST. LOST LOST<br />
F/ F/1536/ F/<br />
1536/ 1536/10 1536/ 10 10<br />
LANDS LANDS AT AT BALLYMADUN<br />
BALLYMADUN<br />
MOTION MOTION D3.13<br />
D3.13<br />
It was proposed by <strong>Council</strong>lor T. O Leary, seconded by <strong>Council</strong>lor A. Devitt.<br />
“That <strong>Fingal</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolves that the following Local Objective be placed<br />
on the GE zoned lands at Ballymadun identified on the accompanying map<br />
outlined in red and signed for identification purposes by the proposer of this<br />
motion in the <strong>Fingal</strong> Development Plan 2011-2017. Applications for HT-High<br />
Technology uses on lands zoned general employment which would not<br />
compromise the overall vision for the GE zoning may be considered on their<br />
merits.”<br />
The following report by the Manager which had been circulated was considered:<br />
“The site was the subject of MD3.30 to rezone HT to GE which was passed.<br />
It would appear that the proposed motion is seeking by way of local objective to<br />
apply 2 zoning matrix to a single land parcel (I.e. HT and GE matrices). This is<br />
inappropriate at this location.<br />
The GE zoning is envisaged as providing for general opportunities for enterprise<br />
and employment whist the HT zoning is more focused to provide for office,<br />
research and development and high technology and advanced manufacturing type<br />
employment. While there are some uses common to both GE and HT zonings<br />
other land uses are not considered compatible. Uses identified for GE zoned land<br />
are more car and HGV based compared with HT lands. HT users seek high quality<br />
physical environments next to other similar high technology users and not more<br />
general industry.<br />
The GE zoning allows for a wider range of land uses and is considered the most<br />
appropriate zoning at this location.