16.10.2013 Views

Contents - FIP

Contents - FIP

Contents - FIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Health service development<br />

In the two decades after World War I industrialised countries like the US, France, the UK<br />

and Canada typically spent in the order of 3 per cent of their annual GDPs on health care.<br />

Today the equivalent figure for ‘developed’ nations across the world is about 10 per cent,<br />

although in the case of the US approaching 17 per cent of that country’s relatively high<br />

national income is presently accounted for by health sector outlays. Public spending on<br />

health care in America has for some decades been – at about 8 per cent of GDP – comparable<br />

as a proportion of national wealth with that recorded in, say, the UK, Sweden, Australia<br />

or Japan. It is the additional spending made via private insurance schemes and direct<br />

out-of-pocket payments which is atypically high in the US.<br />

Within these totals 1-2 per cent of GDP (that is, in the order of 15 per cent of all health<br />

spending) is currently devoted to medicines, vaccines and allied product costs and<br />

pharmaceutical service provision. In regions such as Europe there have been historically<br />

stable contrasts between the relatively high overall pharmaceutical sector costs seen<br />

in ‘Mediterranean’ model countries like Greece and Spain (which have had low prices<br />

for patent protected medicines, balanced by relatively expensive generic/off patented<br />

branded products) and the lower overall (despite higher unit prices for newer medicines)<br />

spending observed in North Western Europe.<br />

These differences may now be reducing, in part because of the impacts of the ‘Euro crisis’<br />

and the impacts of global economic restructuring. Yet the fact that they endured for<br />

approaching half a century serves as a reminder that efficiency in the pharmaceutical<br />

sector and health care generally is a function of far more than securing low average drug<br />

prices and labour costs. It is still the case across the world that combinations of low prices<br />

for innovative medicines coupled with relatively high (if still comparatively affordable)<br />

off-patent medicine costs and lower wages for groups such as nurses compared to higher<br />

rewards for successful doctors and pharmacy business owners can be indicative of health<br />

system failings.<br />

Health spending in regions like western Europe and north America began to accelerate<br />

after World War II, when many more advanced nations consolidated their health<br />

insurance and allied schemes to in effect provide universal coverage. The principles<br />

upon which systems such as the UK NHS (which was functionally established in 1948) are<br />

founded differ from, for instance, those characteristic of the Bismarckian thinking underlying<br />

German health care funding or the national and private insurance based models<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!