methodology - Forest and Bird

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Best Fish Guide 2012-2013 How it works? Criteria for Ecological Rankings of New Zealand Commercial Fisheries Produced and Published by Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand, Inc. PO Box 631, Level One, 90 Ghuznee Street, Wellington. www.forestandbird.org.nz January 2012
Acknowledgements Author / Technical Advisor: Barry Weeber Editing: Katrina Subedar The author and Forest & Bird thanks Michael Szabo, Kevin Hackwell, Dr. Liz Slooten, Cath Wallace, Alan Tennyson, Sue Yates, Carol Knutson, Karli Thomas, Kate Mitcalfe, Kirstie Knowles, New Zealand Marine Science Society Executive and anonymous reviewers for their peer review comments. Cover Design: Rob Deliver Cover shot (Kingfish): Colin Gans First published November 2004 Revised 2005, 2007, 2009, 2012 Recommended citation: Forest & Bird (2012). Best Fish Guide 2012-2013: Criteria for ecological rankings of New Zealand commercial fisheries. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc, January 2012. Disclaimer: Every effort has been made by Forest & Bird to ensure the accuracy of information contained in this guide. Forest & Bird welcomes any comments or further information on the text and images, but cannot accept any liability for any errors or omissions. Note: The rankings criteria were not applied to fish or seafood imported from other countries, such as tinned and frozen fish, or seafood from aquaculture. A set of critieria for aquaculture species is being developed. Nor did it assess regional variations in fisheries. It assessed average New Zealand fisheries based on methods, impacts and management.
Page 4 and 5: Contents: Criteria for Ecological R
Page 6 and 7: The UK based Marine Stewardship cou
Page 8 and 9: Article 7.5 of the Code of Conduct
Page 10 and 11: Table 1 Weighting of criteria Weigh
Page 12 and 13: Where fishing catches stay high, ef
Page 14 and 15: hypothesis is that these fish are e
Page 16 and 17: D Uncertain/ unknown yield or stock
Page 18 and 19: Forest & Bird has reviewed the resu
Page 20 and 21: eg snapper D Longlining D Drag net
Page 22 and 23: Table 5 Population resilience and p
Page 24 and 25: ycatch, and incidental catch) 15 .
Page 26 and 27: Table 8 IUCN and Department of Cons
Page 28 and 29: under the South Pacific Regional Fi
Page 30 and 31: Appendix II: Key Biological Indicat
Page 32 and 33: Patagonian Dissostichus eleginoides
Page 34 and 35: Appendix III: Marine Species Listed
Page 36 and 37: 3. Marine species listed by CITES I
Page 38 and 39: Cont. Appendix IV: Bird Species Rep
Page 40 and 41: 5. Threatened status of marine mamm
Page 42 and 43: Appendix VIII: Wildlife Act - Sched
Page 44 and 45: B. Glossary Aquaculture - aquatic s
Page 46 and 47: Mid-water trawl - a trawl designed
Page 48 and 49: Appendix X: Report References Abrah
Page 50 and 51: Dunn A (2003) Revised estimates of
Page 52 and 53:
Ministry of Fisheries Science Group
Page 54 and 55:
Thrush S F and Dayton P K (2002) Di
Page 56 and 57:
Hanchet S M, Coburn R P, Field K D,
Page 58 and 59:
Stevenson ML (1998) Inshore Trawl S
Page 60 and 61:
Elephantfish Elephantfish Callorhin
Page 62 and 63:
Kokowhaawhaa Anchovy Engraulis aust
Page 64 and 65:
symmetricus murphyi NZ littleneck c
Page 66 and 67:
Schnapper Snapper Pagrus auratus Sc
Page 68:
Tupa Scallops Pecten novaezealandia
show all

methodology - Forest and Bird

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?