24.10.2013 Views

Pro-Environmental Behavior and Rational Consumer Choice

Pro-Environmental Behavior and Rational Consumer Choice

Pro-Environmental Behavior and Rational Consumer Choice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pro</strong>-<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Behavior</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Rational</strong> <strong>Consumer</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> 20<br />

We thus find that pro-environment behaviors are associated with greater subjective wellbeing,<br />

even when we control for differences concerning attitudes towards the environment.<br />

The coefficients are of sizeable magnitude. Using the coefficient of (un)employment as a<br />

benchmark, the coefficients of the pro-environment behaviors amount to about one fourth.<br />

The coefficient is largest in the case of consuming green products <strong>and</strong> smallest in the case<br />

of water conservation.<br />

Against the background of our theoretical framework, significant positive coefficients<br />

suggest that pro-environment consumption is less than individually rational. This applies<br />

particularly with respect to green products <strong>and</strong> less so with respect to recycling <strong>and</strong> water<br />

conservation. The latter finding is consistent with the idea that intrinsic motives may be<br />

more important in the case of buying green products than with respect to recycling <strong>and</strong><br />

water conservation, as financial considerations may play a role in these latter cases.<br />

4.3 Distorted <strong>Choice</strong> <strong>and</strong> Materialistic Values<br />

One of the propositions discussed in section 2 states that more materialistically oriented<br />

individuals may be subject to greater choice distortions <strong>and</strong> utility losses than less<br />

materialistically oriented persons. We check this proposition by means of the following<br />

attitude question from the World Value Surveys:<br />

“People sometimes talk about what the aims of this country should be for the next ten<br />

years. On this card are listed some of the goals which different people would give top<br />

priority. Would you please say which one of these you, yourself, consider the most<br />

important? First choice:<br />

• A high level of economic growth<br />

• Strong defence forces<br />

• People have more say about how things are done<br />

• Trying to make our cities <strong>and</strong> countryside more beautiful”<br />

We call this item Materialism <strong>and</strong> code it as follows: Materialism = 1 if “A high level of<br />

economic growth” is the respondent’s first choice <strong>and</strong> Materialism = 0 if it is not the first<br />

choice.<br />

We include Materialism in the life satisfaction equation both as a separate explanatory<br />

variable <strong>and</strong> as an interaction term with our pro-environment behaviors. In doing so, we<br />

continue to include the attitude variables from Table 2. The results are displayed in Table<br />

3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!