19 MB PDF - GlobalSecurity.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AIR FORCE PROGRAMS The risk associated with the interdependency of these multiple Acquisition Category 1D programs (E-10A, MP-RTIP and Global Hawk) must not be underestimated. The E-10A is dependent on MP-RTIP to deliver its primary sensor. MP-RTIP is dependent on E-10A to provide a test platform for the sensor. Planned delivery of the two will have to be closely coordinated to ensure neither has to wait for the delivery of the other. Due to the scope and the long lead times required for both programs, neither will be able to tolerate delays without experiencing significantly increased costs. The same coordination issues exist for MP-RTIP and Global Hawk. 282
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS National Airspace System (NAS) The National Airspace System (NAS) program will replace three types of Air Traffic Control and Landing System equipment used to support the radar approach control mission. NAS includes voice switches, approach control and control tower automation, and airport surveillance radars. When fully fielded, the DoD NAS program upgrade will include four programs: • The Voice Communications Switching System (VCSS) is the communications component of the NAS modernization program. • The DoD Advanced Automation System (DAAS) is designed to receive and process primary and secondary radar data, flight plan information, weather, airport environmental data, and administrative information (such as notices to Airmen). • The Digital Airport Surveillance Radar (DASR) is designed to provide accurate target data to the local air traffic control facilities with improved target detection accuracy, clutter rejection, aircraft identification accuracy, altitude data, and weather capability. • The Military Airspace Management System (MAMS) schedules, tracks, and documents utilization of special use airspace in a non-real-time manner, and interoperates with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The Air Force moved MAMS from development to sustainment on October 1, 2000. Since then, three software versions have been released – one major release, and two minor releases. The FAA is the lead organization for VCSS and DAAS acquisition. The Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC) serves as the DoD lead for DAAS/DASR testing and sole test agency for MAMS. DoD is working with the FAA through an interagency agreement for all VCSS, DAAS, and DASR test activities. DOT&E will publish one beyond lowrate initial production report on NAS after all system-level testing is complete. AFOTEC found the VCSS operationally effective, but not operationally suitable as a result of the VCSS DoD multi-Service operational test and evaluation (MOT&E) in 1999. DOT&E reviewed corrective actions taken after the MOT&E and found them adequate to rectify the suitability shortcomings. The fullrate production decision was executed in November 1999. The MOT&E concept for DAAS and DASR included two phases of testing, Phase 1 (developmental test/operational test) and Phase 2 (dedicated operational testing). DAAS and DASR have been through two rounds of MOT&E, conducted from October 1999 through September 2002. In each round of operational testing, AFOTEC identified significant numbers of critical deficiencies, and while they eventually rated the DAAS operationally effective and operationally suitable in June 2001, the DASR was last rated by AFOTEC as not effective and not suitable in a February 2003 MOT&E 2 status report. Based upon Milestone Decision Authority direction in November 2002, the Air Force Acquisition Executive, the NAS Program Office, and AFOTEC developed a new way ahead for NAS, leveraging the results of FAA testing to the extent possible, and planning for another round of MOT&E with DoD production representative test articles in the DoD environment. DOT&E is concerned over the immaturity of configurations that have been repeatedly presented for operational testing. 283
Page 1:
Director, Operational Test and Eval
Page 4 and 5:
DIRECTOR’S INTRODUCTION Comparati
Page 6 and 7:
DIRECTOR’S INTRODUCTION iv
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Suite of Integrat
Page 10 and 11:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Unmanned Combat A
Page 12 and 13:
DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT TEST A
Page 14 and 15:
DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT 4
Page 16 and 17:
DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT PROGRA
Page 18 and 19:
DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT NAVY P
Page 20 and 21:
DOT&E ACTIVITY AND OVERSIGHT AIR FO
Page 22 and 23:
DOD PROGRAMS GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE
Page 24 and 25:
DOD PROGRAMS AEGIS BALLISTIC MISSIL
Page 26 and 27:
DOD PROGRAMS PATRIOT ADVANCED CAPAB
Page 28 and 29:
DOD PROGRAMS A thorough lethality t
Page 30 and 31:
DOD PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACTI
Page 32 and 33:
DOD PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASSE
Page 34 and 35:
DOD PROGRAMS effectiveness deficien
Page 36 and 37:
DOD PROGRAMS Solution experienced d
Page 38 and 39:
DOD PROGRAMS all users worldwide lo
Page 40 and 41:
DOD PROGRAMS Northwestern United St
Page 42 and 43:
DOD PROGRAMS Environment, and impro
Page 44 and 45:
DOD PROGRAMS with user traffic to e
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
DOD PROGRAMS Additional development
Page 50 and 51:
DOD PROGRAMS Test planning appears
Page 52 and 53:
DOD PROGRAMS suitability for aircra
Page 54 and 55:
DOD PROGRAMS Because the OA/LUT beg
Page 56 and 57:
DOD PROGRAMS of the current system
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
DOD PROGRAMS JITC will conduct a fo
Page 62 and 63:
DOD PROGRAMS aboard two ships of th
Page 64 and 65:
ARMY PROGRAMS Several issues will b
Page 66 and 67:
ARMY PROGRAMS suppression system (F
Page 68 and 69:
ARMY PROGRAMS The ASAS RWS risk ass
Page 70 and 71:
ARMY PROGRAMS The FBCB2 digital com
Page 72 and 73:
ARMY PROGRAMS ICH using ARL-develop
Page 74 and 75:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACT
Page 76 and 77:
ARMY PROGRAMS 66
Page 78 and 79:
ARMY PROGRAMS risk reduction ballis
Page 80 and 81:
ARMY PROGRAMS should make the techn
Page 82 and 83:
ARMY PROGRAMS 72
Page 84 and 85:
ARMY PROGRAMS Kingdom Armored Divis
Page 86 and 87:
ARMY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
Page 88 and 89:
ARMY PROGRAMS 78
Page 90 and 91:
ARMY PROGRAMS requirements. Four se
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
ARMY PROGRAMS ISYSCON(V)4 is deploy
Page 96 and 97:
ARMY PROGRAMS 86
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
ARMY PROGRAMS Warrior live fire tes
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
ARMY PROGRAMS Recently, the Army de
Page 108 and 109:
ARMY PROGRAMS The test unit, 4 th I
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
ARMY PROGRAMS Headquarters, Delawar
Page 114 and 115:
ARMY PROGRAMS During FY04, the Army
Page 116 and 117:
ARMY PROGRAMS IOT&E, the MC had a d
Page 118 and 119:
ARMY PROGRAMS 108
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
ARMY PROGRAMS The LFT&E strategy wi
Page 124 and 125:
ARMY PROGRAMS PM adopted a short-te
Page 126 and 127:
ARMY PROGRAMS MH-60R to reduce cost
Page 128 and 129:
ARMY PROGRAMS 118
Page 130 and 131:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ASS
Page 132 and 133:
NAVY PROGRAMS Plan. The Navy and DO
Page 134 and 135:
NAVY PROGRAMS 124
Page 136 and 137:
NAVY PROGRAMS While design problems
Page 138 and 139:
NAVY PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATION ACT
Page 140 and 141:
NAVY PROGRAMS 130
Page 142 and 143:
NAVY PROGRAMS LHD 8 will likely be
Page 144 and 145:
NAVY PROGRAMS test/operational test
Page 146 and 147:
NAVY PROGRAMS AN/USG-3 equipment, a
Page 148 and 149:
NAVY PROGRAMS grave responsibility
Page 150 and 151:
NAVY PROGRAMS The Navy tested the p
Page 152 and 153:
NAVY PROGRAMS 142
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
NAVY PROGRAMS their own development
Page 160 and 161:
NAVY PROGRAMS Due to its importance
Page 162 and 163:
NAVY PROGRAMS field-testing of the
Page 164 and 165:
NAVY PROGRAMS understanding the imp
Page 166 and 167:
NAVY PROGRAMS • The PDRR EFV(P)
Page 168 and 169:
NAVY PROGRAMS November 2003; Milest
Page 170 and 171:
NAVY PROGRAMS 160
Page 172 and 173:
NAVY PROGRAMS The F-35 JSF Air Syst
Page 174 and 175:
NAVY PROGRAMS Software Qualificatio
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
NAVY PROGRAMS and Navy later confir
Page 180 and 181:
NAVY PROGRAMS 170
Page 182 and 183:
NAVY PROGRAMS 172
Page 184 and 185:
NAVY PROGRAMS Operational effective
Page 186 and 187:
NAVY PROGRAMS vulnerable area becau
Page 188 and 189:
NAVY PROGRAMS performance as the le
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
NAVY PROGRAMS 184
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
NAVY PROGRAMS OT&E for the NESP ter
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
NAVY PROGRAMS parameter of 98 perce
Page 204 and 205:
NAVY PROGRAMS RAM HAS Mode. The pro
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
NAVY PROGRAMS Mark 2 must be combin
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
NAVY PROGRAMS DOT&E feels the model
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
NAVY PROGRAMS 206
Page 218 and 219:
NAVY PROGRAMS completed. This softw
Page 220 and 221:
NAVY PROGRAMS 210
Page 222 and 223:
NAVY PROGRAMS personnel in sea stat
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
NAVY PROGRAMS The AH-1Z attack heli
Page 228 and 229:
NAVY PROGRAMS On August 28, 2003, t
Page 230 and 231:
NAVY PROGRAMS 220
Page 232 and 233:
NAVY PROGRAMS 222
Page 234 and 235:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Test and Evaluat
Page 236 and 237:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Force as not per
Page 238 and 239:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS DOTE also has co
Page 240 and 241:
AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 16 percent decre
Page 242 and 243: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS The most promisi
Page 244 and 245: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS TEST & EVALUATIO
Page 246 and 247: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS changed to a com
Page 248 and 249: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS aircraft. Fleet
Page 252 and 253: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS • August 2003,
Page 256 and 257: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS 246
Page 260 and 261: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS and sea C2ISR su
Page 262 and 263: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS engine performan
Page 264 and 265: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Quarterly Defens
Page 268 and 269: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS MOT&E was postpo
Page 272 and 273: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS the Key Performa
Page 276 and 277: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS F-15C found the
Page 280 and 281: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS not operationall
Page 282 and 283: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Operational Test
Page 284 and 285: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS In FY03, the pri
Page 286 and 287: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS satellites indic
Page 288 and 289: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS complex dependen
Page 290 and 291: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS as a means to co
Page 298 and 299: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Defense Advanced
Page 300 and 301: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Operational Requ
Page 302 and 303: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS The first two pr
Page 306 and 307: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS Common Gyro Refe
Page 312 and 313: AIR FORCE PROGRAMS DSCS satellites
Page 314 and 315: LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION LIVE FI
Page 316 and 317: LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION In FY03
Page 318 and 319: LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION analyse
Page 320 and 321: LIVE FIRE TEST & EVALUATION 310
Page 322 and 323: JOINT TEST & EVALUATION • Joint U
Page 324 and 325: JOINT TEST & EVALUATION institution
Page 326 and 327: JOINT TEST & EVALUATION Combined JT
Page 328 and 329: JOINT TEST & EVALUATION TEST & EVAL
Page 332 and 333: JOINT TEST & EVALUATION • JGPSCE
Page 334 and 335: JOINT TEST & EVALUATION The JLOG/PE
Page 336 and 337: JOINT TEST & EVALUATION JMACA condu
Page 340 and 341: JOINT TEST & EVALUATION hand kits w
Page 342 and 343:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION UAV Operati
Page 344 and 345:
INFORMATION ASSURANCE • Participa
Page 346 and 347:
INFORMATION ASSURANCE both training
Page 348 and 349:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES The mode
Page 350 and 351:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES Issues i
Page 352 and 353:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES 40% 35%
Page 354 and 355:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES migratio
Page 356 and 357:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES In FY03,
Page 358 and 359:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES produced
Page 360 and 361:
SYSTEMS AND TEST RESOURCES 350
Page 362 and 363:
INDEX OF PROGRAMS Defense Medical L
Page 364:
INDEX OF PROGRAMS Navy Standard Int
show all

19 MB PDF - GlobalSecurity.org

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?